(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
|---|
Category:Agreement States
MONTHYEARML23065A1562023-03-0101 March 2023
Sunsetted Management Directive 5.3 NRC and Agreement State Working Groups
ML23065A1002023-03-0101 March 2023
Active Management Directive 5.3 NRC and Agreement State Working Groups
ML21306A1152021-12-17017 December 2021
STC-21-085 Agreement State Letter Northstar Revision 2 of Licensing Guidance
ML21223A4072021-08-17017 August 2021
Addendum to Fc and Materials Decommissioning Inspection Program Wg Charter
ML20156A1162020-06-0808 June 2020
STC-20-044 -STC Letter - Inspection Guidance During Transition from COVID-19 Mandatory Telework
ML20161A1012020-06-0505 June 2020
STC-20-029 Questions and Answers Regarding the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency
ML19364A1402020-03-0505 March 2020
OMB-3150-0029 Supporting Statement for Requests to Agreement States
ML20196L5182020-01-0909 January 2020
Comment Resolution Document SA-105
ML20189A0072019-12-18018 December 2019
Comment Resolution Document SA-102
ML19140A2742019-05-22022 May 2019
STC-19-027-Direct Final Rule-Advance Power 1400 (Apr 1400) Design Certification
ML19127A2252019-05-0909 May 2019
STC-19-025, Results of the Annual Count of Radioactive Material Licensees in the National Materials Program
ML19031C9692019-01-31031 January 2019
Revised Draft Vermont Agreement Application Sections 4.3 and 4.4 Package Contents
ML18107A7202018-08-0808 August 2018
OMB 3150-0029, Draft Supporting Statement, Requests to Agreement States for Information.
ML18095A5332018-04-0505 April 2018
Vermont Draft Agreement - NRC Comments
ML23062A6982000-10-0404 October 2000
OAS 2000 - October 4th Transcription Organization of Agreement States Meeting, October 2-4, 2000, Charleston, South Carolina
ML23062A7082000-10-0303 October 2000
OAS 2000 Medical Issues Donald Cool
ML23062A7002000-10-0303 October 2000
OAS 2000 - October 3rd Transcript Organization of Agreement States Meeting, October 2-4, 2000 Charleston South Carolina
ML23062A7012000-10-0303 October 2000
Orc 2000 NRC Decommissioning Guidance Feedback Larry Camper
ML23062A7052000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 Decommissioning Issues John Greeves
ML23062A7042000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 Radioactivity in Solid Waster Regulations and Guidance - Allard
ML23062A7032000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 Interagency Steering Committee on Radiation Standards Iscors Steve Collins
ML23062A7022000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 - October 2nd Transcript Organization of Agreement States Meeting, October 2-4, 2000, Charleston, South Carolina
ML23062A7062000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 the Tritium Guy Joe Klinger
ML23062A7072000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 Getting to the Root Causes of Non-Compliance: a Prescription for Prevention, Robert Emery
ML23062A6992000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 Financial Security Three Texas Case Studies - Ruth Mcburney
ML23062A7092000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 the NCRP Strategic Plan: the Council'S Role in the 21st Century Michael Ryan
ML23062A6972000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 State Representation on the Interagency Steering Committee on Radiation Standards Iscors Steve Collins
ML23062A6962000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 Organization of Agreement States Presentation Edgar D Bailey
ML23062A6952000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 Low-Level Radioactive Waster Disposal Issues Alice Rogers
ML23062A6942000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 What Is the National Materials Program Paperiello Presentation
ML23062A6922000-10-0202 October 2000
OAS 2000 National Materials Program Working Group Presentation Kathy Allen and Jim Myers
2023-03-01
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
Comment Resolution Document Summary of Comments for Interim SA-102, Reviewing the Common Performance Indicator, Technical Quality of Inspections Sent to the Agreement States, NRC NMSS, NRC Regions I, III, and IV for Comment in STC-19-079, December 18, 2019 Comment Source Location Comment Accepted Remarks No.
1 Colorado Applies to While we understand that the revision and Yes Efforts have been taken to address all Interim authoring of these procedures is a multi- these differences.
SA organization process involving many procedures individuals, when looking at the collection there seems to be a multitude of different voices and writing styles and as a result it lacks uniformity.
2 Colorado Applies to Specifically, it appears that many of the Yes Please note that most of the all Interim appendices address common items and it appendices in the interim SA would be appropriate to use common titles procedures (i.e., the Examples of procedures for the appendices and to keep them in a Less than Satisfactory Findings of common order if possible. Program Performance from the common and non-common IMPEP performance indicators; the casework summary sheets, and inspector accompaniment summary sheets, will be posted on the IMPEP toolbox at:
https://scp.nrc.gov/impeptools.html) have been removed and will be
placed on the SCP Web site to allow for dynamic revisions.
3 Colorado Applies to Additionally, during the drafting process Yes Change made.
all Interim the idea of consistency within these SA procedures regarding the procedures phrase "Agreement State or NRC..."
vs. "NRC or Agreement State..." was discussed. This should be made uniform throughout the procedures.
4 NJ General: Follow-up should be hyphenated. Yes Change made.
Applies to all Interim SA procedures ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBERS PACKAGE: ML20183A152 COMMENT RESOLUTION DOCUMENT: ML20189A007