ML20274A160
| ML20274A160 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/07/2020 |
| From: | Roldan L NRC/NMSS/DMSST |
| To: | |
| Roldan-Otero L | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20183A152 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20274A160 (1) | |
Text
Comment Resolution Document - External Summary of Comments for Interim SA-100, Integrated Materials Implementation Program (IMPEP)
Sent to the Agreement States, NRC NMSS, NRC Regions I, III, and IV for Comment in STC letter 20-004, dated January 7, 2020 Comment No.
Source Location Comment Accepted Remarks 1
Colorado SA-100 Section V.E.2 Section V.E.2 lists Compatibility Requirements as an item, but this item has changed names in SA-107.
Yes Change made.
2 Wisconsin V.C.4.b.
Can the NRC clarify when should the MRB be scheduled? Page 12 says no later than 90 days after the IMPEP exit meeting and page 26 says approximately 90-105 days from the last day of the IMPEP review.
Yes The MRB should be scheduled between 90-105 days. Language was added on page 12 to be consistent with page 26.
3 New Jersey Introduction To be consistent with SA-102. Others need changing if this is the protocol.
Yes Changes made to be consistent with other SA procedures.
4 New Jersey V.M Are there any timeframes that the EDO must follow? 90 days after appeal, or some other timeframe?
NA SA-106 outlines the appeal process and timeframes. The SA-100 points to that procedure in Section V.5 where it references MRBs.