ML20127A186

Requests Lists of Type A,B & C Test Repts to Assist ORNL in Gathering Data for Containment Leak Test.Info Requested by 820611

ML20127A186
Person / Time
Issue date:	06/03/1982
From:	Arndt G NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
To:	Shapaker J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20126E434	List: ML20126E431 ML20126E750 ML20126E798 ML20126E831 ML20126E994 ML20126F139 ML20126F221 ML20126F254 ML20126F479 ML20126F615 ML20126F644 ML20126F659 ML20126F946 ML20126F970 ML20126F977 ML20126G018 ML20126G093 ML20127A186 ML20127A289 ML20127A368 ML20127A386 ML20127A395 ML20127B180 ML20127B286
References
CON-FIN-B-0489-2, CON-FIN-B-489-2, FOIA-85-143 NUDOCS 8206210067
Download: ML20127A186 (35)

Text

, _ _ - _ __. _. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _

i .

d Q JUN 3 $82 MEMORANDUM FOR: Jim Shapaker, NRR:CSB John Huang, NRR:CSB Don Kirkpatrick, IE Walt Rekito. IE:RI Herb Whitener IE:RII Fred Maura, IE:RIII Joe Tapia. IE:RIV Harvey Canter, IE:RV FROM: Gunter Arndt, MSEB, DET, RES

SUBJECT:

AVAILABILITY OF TYPE A, B & C TEST REPORTS ORNL is starting to gather the essential data for the containment leak test contract. What they need most right now are the licensee test reports. Please furnish me with lists of:

1. What Type A, B & C test reports you have at hand that can be made available to ORNL on short notice, noting:

a. Type test

b. Plant name and type (Mk I, II, III, PWR, ice condenser)

c. Whether a summary report, or whether backup field data is included

d. How thick a package (for copying and mailing information).

2. Other Type A, B, or C reports that you are aware of, and know location of, even if not at hand, that can be made available to ORNL.

3. Which plants' (by type, name, or both) test reports (complete or summary only) you would like to have ORNL review for:

a. Type A tests

b. Type B tests ,

c. Type C tests. .

po ip-8 5 -I 43 r' k

()

1 Multiple Addressoas 2 I need this information in order that ORNL can get from, or through, the NRC the reports and field data essential to the performance of this contract.

This is not, at this time, a request for the actual reports, just for a list of which ORNL should review, their availability, and how to get those not on hand.

Please refer to the Work Description of Task A of the enclosed Work Statement for the context of this request. I would appreciate the above information by Friday, June 11, 1982, or sooner if possible.

i I

lanter Arndt dechanical/ Structural Engineering Branch 4

Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research i

I i

l I

e

+ - - - - - - - -- - - -.- . - - . - . - . - - , . - - . - . -, . - - . _ , .

. ~

' ' s (7

o Multiple Addressees 2 I need this information in order that ORNL can get from, or through, the NRC the reports and field data essential to the performance of this contract.

This is not, at this time, a request for the actual reports, just for a list of which ORNL should review, their availability, and how to get those not on hand.

Please refer to the Work Description of Task A of the enclosed Work Statement for the context of this request. I would appreciate the above information by Friday, June 11, 1982, or sooner if possible.

Gunter Arndt Mechanical / Structural Engineering Branch Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research DISTRIBUTION GAARLOTTO LCSHA0 WFAN?ERSON JRICHAROSON GARNOT MSE9 READING MSE8 SUBJECT 8 T .

G ne: sp 6/1/82

a .I g

NRC CONTACTS FOR ORNL ON CONTAINMENT LEAK TESTING l

. NRR:CS8 Jim Shapaker 492-9416 l John Huang 492-9424 IE Ndqtrs Don Kirkpatrick 492-7746 l (Gene Gallagher, formerly involved) 492-4792 (Roger Woodruff, on MSIV test study) 492-4794 RI Walt Rekito (FTS) 488-1292 II Herb Whitener (FTS) 242-4193

!!! Fred Maura (FTS) 384 2696 IV Joe Tapia (FTS) 728-8158 V Harvey Canter (209) 748-2791 (Rancho Seco) i I

o

--_..r. _ . - - - . -. - _ . . . - ,- - .- . - ~ - - . - , - - _._ . - _ _ -

... 4, ,

• O l ' ,. . '

h FIN #: 8044g -1. l l

project

Title:

Containment Leak Rate Testing .. . : m, m ,

};* STATEMENT OF WORK 4

BACKGROUNO j l

Appendix J to 10 CFR 50 was issued in 1973. Changes in testing procedures.

l j questions on interpretation, and numerous plant-specific exemptica requests have generated a need to update and streamline this rule. In addition, in 1981 a national standard was issued providing detailed re:o.mendations on the test procedures and analyses. Some of the positions in the prof.osed revision should be reviewed in depth against the field and licensing experiences of the past decade. Observations and recommendations resulting from such .

j a review would either validate the positions in the proposed revision, or  !

would provide a basis for modifying such positions.

l 08JECTIVE f

! Evaluate the practicality of the containment leak testing program, and i campatibility of regulatory requirements and industry testing standards. l'

i, SCopt l A. Review existing containment leak rate testing regulatory requirements, and

the programs conducted in compliance with these requirements, using field ,

{

and licensing experience. ,

S. Review the proposed Appendix J revision. provide recossendations and l l ~

bases for specific proposed Appendix J revisions, and comment on the remainder 1 of the proposed revision as appropriate.

1 C. Review AN5!/AM5 54.81981," Containment system Leakage Testing Requirements".*..*

1 for campatibility with the proposed Appendix J revision. j l

0. provide a value-impact analysis for the entire proposed Appendix J revision, i as prepared for public comment issue, addressing the value and impact on i

the licensees, the licensing process, and the public. Revise the value-impact l

analysis as necessary following the public comment period, reflecting any 1 r

j changes made for the final rule.

WORK OESCRIPTION l TASK A Review the existing Appendix J test requirements, including: (

1. Relevant licensing exemption requests and exemptions granted.

! 2. Relevant Licensee Event Reports (LERs).

3. See also #g A minimum of 3 Type A test reports, complete with field data.

• * * " * * * *

• i

4. 3 *

! * * * * * * * * * * * *

• i i 5. . C

6. * *

• A minimum of 7 additional susmary reports each for Type A, 8,

! & C tests.

! 7. ( * * * ) If not previously done, witness at leist one test each of Type ,

) A, 8, and C tests. .

J

8. Interview, directly if necessary.or via correspondence to the maximum  !

! practical extent, at least 5 licensees, 2 non-utility organizations that t

perform these tests under contract to utilities, and 3 architect-engineer 1 firms that design containments and plant systems that are subjected to Type A. O, a C tests.

i i

@e l

i_________-.___ _ - _ , _ _ - - _ _ _ _

• \ g

' g. Interview directly representattves f rom the following MC groups:

MR - Containment Systems tranen; IE - Division of Reactor Programs; RES - Mechanical / Structural Engineering tranch. At this time, selection of plants from which data is to be reviewed and tests witnessed will be discussed. Selections are subject to approval by NAC Technical Monitor.

Items 1 - 7 will provide data for evaluation, while items 8 & g will provide information on field and Itcensing experiences with the existing Appendix J.

l Time allocated: Approximately 6 months.

TASK I

• With the background on the existing Appendix J gained from Task A. review the proposed revision to Appendia J.

• provide cossent on the proposed revision in general.

• In particular, provide recosmondations, and supporting bases, for the following specific aspects of the proposed revision:

. 1. Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (CILAT) pressure

2. CILAT frequency

3. CILRT duration 4.' CILAT reporting requirements

5. Local leak testing g 4. Verification testing 7.Testtemperaturefora)purgevalves,b)M51V's, orc)other containment isolation valves

8. Waiting period following valve closure before leak testing.

Further details are as follow:

1. Containment Inteersted Leak Rate Test (CILRT) Pressure Containment tests have been conducted at the design btsis accident pressure or at a reduced pressure. At issue is whether reduced pressure testing provides adequate assurance of containment integrity. Otfficulties have been encountered in defining the correlation of results at peak pressure with results at reduced pressure. There is a need to resolve the pros and cons of testing at peak pressure or reduced pressure.

1.1 Review and analyse plant leak-rate data from Test A to identify the problems associated with low-pressure testing.

1.2 To the eatent that the information is readily retrievable from the available literaure, review the foreign experience and data, and provide conclusions regarding their experience and philosophy of low-pressure testing. This is to be considered as supplementary to the domestic testing experience.

1.3 Assess validity and methods for extrapolation of low-pressure test results to accident pressure.

1.4 Discuss the advantages and disac antages of the htgh- and low-pressure tests and provide recommendations to MC regarding changes to Appendia J.

i . , .,

l .

o- t  ;

4

) 3-O '

2. CILRT Frecuency i

) '

!* The frequency of performing containment integrated leak rate tests is j based on the 10-year service perios. Any delay in the licensing of a plant j

following the performance of the preoperational CILRT would extend the time  !

i interval for the first periodic CILRT. The time interval between successive

CILRTs is subject to interpretation. perhaps a CILRT should not have to be i

performed in conjenction with the 10-year inservice inspection outage. Under consideration is a frequency for performing CILRTs withest refernce to the 10-year service period. [

2.1 Review the test emperience and recommend acceptable test frequency with j t

j technical support.

2.2 Evaluate the impact on the test conclusions of the different methods of f l data analysis and test techniques. l j '

3 j 3. CILRT Duration . ,

1 Develop and provide a method of analysis and guidelines for determining i acceptable duration of CILRT test. f j  ;

j 4. CILRT Reportine Reevirements i 1 provide recommendations on reporting requirements with respect to format i and test results for integrated and local leak rate tests (V.8.). j

. t

5. Local Leak Testine (

1 5.1 Examine the feasibility and practicality of conducting local leak rate i j (Types 8 4 C) tests during plant operation.  ;

I 5.2 Explore regulatory criteria and techniques to encourage continuous l l

1eak testing.  !

. l, l 4. Verification Testine Appendix J requires that a supplemental leak rate test be performed to l verify the measurements of a containment leak rate. In one such test, the i

CILRT test is repeated after completion of the initial CILRT by introeucing  !

a known leak rate from the containment by direct leakage through an orifice l to atmosphers. The new measurements of leakage from containment should not  ;

i l

very more than 255 from the initial test leakage rate for adeguate verification. i i

At issue is whether such a test is either directly or indirectly useful, and l i

whether the criteria are adequate.

! 6.1 Reassess the acceptability of the supplemental CILRT vertf tcation <

test and test acceptance criteria.

J j'

,- i

7. T_q11 Tampartig_rg Most valves test more leak tight when hot than when cold. Evaluate tne [

, practicality of requiring a valve temperature test conettion, and make '

i appropriate suggestions.

I i 8. Waiting period L

Soft-seated valves seal better after being pressed against the seat for a <

' while. Evaluate the practicality of establishing a waiting period following valve closure before leak testing. Make appropriate recossendations. ,

) l I

e ,

i .

! l l

L -- . - -

G- .I 9

. Time allocated: Approximately 3 months past Task A.

TASK C Review AM51/ANS 54.8-1981. Considering it as a detailed adjunct to the ,

regulation, containing test procedures and analytic metnoes as compared with test criteria in the regulation, i (a) highlight conflicts between the two documents, and '

(b) note if any Appendix J contents belong instead in AN5!/ANS 66.8, or the reverse.

Time allocated: Approximately 2 months past Task A.

TASK 0

1) Develop an initial value-impact statement for the proposed Appendix J revision, using guidance to be provided by the MC. Following the public comment period, revise as necessary to reflect any changes aide for the final rule.

Time allocated: Approximately 3 months past Task A for initial statement.

Approximately 2 separate, additional months for final statement.

i MEETINGS AND TRAVEL Task A will require, for up to two contractor employees per trip, at least:

1 two-day meeting with NRC staff under Task A.

f 2 two-day site visits to witness tests under Task A, if not done j prior to this contract.

i 1 one-day visit to a data source in connection with Task D.

1 two-day meeting with MC staff to discuss Draft Report.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS The contractor will submit the following reports:

1. Monthly progress report

2. Draft Report

3. Final Report 4

i e

a

~'-

. .". 5.

. g y )

o CONTRACT SCHEDULE Task A

. 6 mo .

(Review existing rule)

Task 8 3 mo .

1 (Review Proposed rule)

Task C . 2 mo .

(Review ANSI /ANS 56.8)  ;

. 3 mo . 2 mo .

Task D (Prepare value-impact statement)

O e

itggj PI'.'1 JECT AND DVDGET PHUPUSAL FulliJi;G VlHK IX "'W .

i G ncvistOrs No. /}

F IN N Vf.18 0 R g PROJECT TITLE:

CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE TESTIllG B0489

• NRC D & R NUMDER NRC OrricC Nuclear Regulatory Research 60 19 21 000 CONT RACTOR

• PATENT STATUS Titis proposalis bein: transnriorr<lin advance of rerent AC S U %' iv"Y9 UNION CARBIDE CORPOR ATION s,,e retiew for trainanon purposes only. b'o furtlier Dsv. {)6)

OAK RIDGE NATlONAL LABORATORY #',,#'"["#','","

f, , 7f ff 8

',' #l'f[##j,"),'l,,,#l#$,, , /f "'l,[ dot at.nravueER I 7l'/#((,,l,'#l#

OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE 37830 rasents, poli. 40 10 01 06 ORGANIZATION FTS PHONE NUMBER PE RIOD OF PE R F OR*.1 ANCE COGNIZANT PERSONNEL STARTING DATC NRC PROJECT MANAGER MSEB 443-5860 06-01-82 E. G. Arndt COMPLCTION DATE OTHER NRC T ECHNIC AL ST arf 09-30-83 DOE PROJECT M ANAGER W. R. Bibb DOE-0RO 626-0742 CONT R ACTOR /O HNL

PROG. DIR.

A. L. Lotts rMn 624-0422 PROG. MG R.: F. J. Homan idC Division 624-5169 PROJ. M G R.: D. J. Naus ET Division 624-0657 PRIN. lNVESTIG ATOR(S)0.R. Dougan ET Division 624-0650 G. C. Robinson ET Division 624-0649 STAFF YE ARS OF EFFORT (Round tonearcsttenthotayear) FY 1992 FY 19 8 3 F Y 19 84 FY 1985 F Y 19 86 Direct Scientific / Technical Q,] ],Q Q Q Q Other oirect 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL DIRECT STAFF YEARS 0.1 1.0 0 0 0 COST PROPOSAL (OBLIGATIONS) ( S in Thousands )

oncci Sataries (Cosi Ccniersi 7 80 0 0 0 Material and Services (Exclud ng AOP) 15 0 0 0 0

ADP Support 0 3 0 0 0 Subcontracii and Consuitanis 0 0 0 0 0

' '*"'" O O O O O Travel E apenses Domestic q 7 0 0 0 Indirect Labor Costs (Cost Centers)

'"" ($necie v i 0 0 0 GS0 Change 137 (137) l General and Anninisuative (G& AiGPS) 3 32 0 0 0 TOTAL OPER ATING COST (Obhgations) 150 0 0 0 0 C APIT AL Lf 2VIPMENT rm CH AncEo: 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PROJECT COST (Obhgations) 150 0 0 0 0 OC106LR NOVLMULH DEC[r.1HE R JANU AHY FEDRUARY M A RCH I bb.)

" 12 13 10 10 10 12 MONT t *LY FO REC AST gp g , L gay j g.* t. JULY AUGUST SL P T L*.1 BL H

'"'"5' 13 14 13 10 10 10 7

vu. r m r.;e 1 o.

UC N -14 ? c h 13 e- eit

['a lh

'# ~ OA s t PROJECT AND r }GET PROPOSAL FOR NRC WOllK O 05-m -P9 PROJEC T T IT LE:

CONTAINMEt1T LEAK RATE TESTING .

oot PaoPoslNG ORG ANIZ ATION: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE 37830 FORECAST MILESTONE CHART; Schedule to Start- 5 a ~ Completed (Shown in Qu.irter Year)

PROvlDF FSTIN1 ATED DOLL AR COST FOR F ACH T A Sg ron F ArH FiSr^t YEAR FY 1982 FY 19 83 FY 1984 FY 1085 TY 19 36 1st l>dl3rd l4th 1st l2ndl 3rd l4th 1st l2nd l 3rd l 4th 1st l2ndl 3rd l4th 1st 12ndl ed }4th A. Review existing scatoute t A containment leak rate testing requirements. cost 13 37 B. Review proposed scscoute L a Appendix J revisions.

cost 20 C. Review ANSI /ANS scsc oute L A 56.8-1981 for..compati-

'bility with Appendix J cost 20 D. Provide value-impact scseoute A A analysis for Appendix J proposed revision. cost 30 E. Provide final sentoute da report.

cost 30 13 137 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST PROJtCT DCsCRIPTeoN. (Psovide narratne descriptions on NitC Form 169 page 3 of 3 for the f ollowing topics in the onder listco.

Check applicable block, if an item is not applicable,so state.)

b 1.0BJECTIVE OR PROPOSED WORK 9. 0ESCRIBE SPECI AL FACILITIES REQUIRED

2.

SUMMARY

OF PRIOR EFFORTS 10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST INFORMATION b 3. WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND EXPECTED RESULTS Il. 0BLIGATION ESTIM ATES

12. 0THER (SPEC /FY);

b 4.0ESCRIPTl0N OF ANY FOLLOW ON EFFORTS b 5. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTS b G. REPORTING SCHEDULE

7. SUCCONT RACTO R INF O RMATION

8. LIST NEW CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED APPROV AL AU THO hit Y.StGN ATU H t'. DATE Page F tN Page of UCN*l4505 A (3 9 89 )

3 a y PnOJECT AND r ]GET PROPOSAL FOn NnC WOnK PHOJEC1 TITLL:

CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE TESTING ITEM NO.

1. OBJECTIVE,0F PROPOSED WORK:

Summary The program objective is to evaluate the practicability of the containment leak testing program, and the compatibility of regulatory requirements and industry testing standards. Existing containment leak rate testing regulatory require-ments will be reviewed as well as programs which have been conducted in com-pliance with these requirements. Field and licensing experience will be utilized.

ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 and the proposed revision to Appendix J of 10 CFR 50 will be reviewed. A value-impact analysis will be provided for the entire proposed Appendix J revision. .

Additional Information In 1981 a national standard was issued providing detailed recommendations on the test procedures and analyses. Some of the positions ir the proposed

~

revisions should be reviewed in depth against field and licensing experiences of the past decade. Observations and recommendations resulting from such a -

review would either validate the positions in the proposed revision, or would -

provide a basis for modifying such positions.

2.

SUMMARY

OF PRIOR EFFORTS:

Not applicable.

3. WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND EXPECTED' RESULTS:

Summary Existing contaiment leak rate testing regulatory requirements will be reviewed, as well as the programs conducted in compliance with these requirements, using field and licensing experience. The proposed revision to Appendix J will be reviewed and recommendations provided. ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981, " Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements," will be reviewed for compatibility with the proposed Appendix J revision. A value-impact analysis will be provided for the entire proposed Appendix J revision, as prepared for public comment issue ~,

addressing the value and impact on thelicensees. the licensing process, and the public. After the public comment period, the value-impact analysis will be revised, as required.

FY-1983 <

Work will be completed on all tasks. Task A includes a review of the following:

(1) relevant licensing exemption reports and exemptions granted; (2) relevant license event reports; (3) types A, B and C test reports complete with field data; (4) witnessing of at least one of each of the three type tests; (5) inter-views withlicensees, non-utility organizations that perform leak rate tests, and architectural-engineering firms that design containments and plant systems; and (6) discussions with appropriate NRC groups. Task B includes a review of the proposed revision to Appendix J, a general commentary on the proposed revision, and recomendations on specific aspects of the proposed revision P6ge F IN Pa ge of UCN-14$0b8 (3 9 89 )

'[o t PROJECT AND r PET PnOPOSAL FOn NRC WORK ,

g PROJEC1 TITLC:

CONTAINMEilT LEAK RATE TESTING ,

• ITEM NO.

[ containment integrated leak rate test (CILRT) pressure, CILRT frequency, CILRT duration, CILRT reporting requirements, local leak testing, verification testing, test temperature for valves, and waiting period following valve closure before leak testing]. Task C includes a review of ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 with respect to potential conflicts with the proposed revision to Appendix J, and a determination if any of the Appendix J contents belong instead in ANSI /ANS 56.8--1981. Task D includes development and revision, after public corrent, of a value-imnact statement for the proposed Appendix J revision. Task E includes devefopment of a final report summarizing results of the study.

FY-1984 Work under this study will be completed in FY-1983.

4. DESCRIPTION OF ANY FOLLOW-0N EFFORTS:

A potential follcw-on effort of this study would be a probabilistic risk assessment.

The assessment would include an evaluation of the consequences of a change in the present leakage rate limitations. .

5. RELATIONSHIPS TO OTHER PROJECTS:

The work described herein has a relationship to work and personnel of project No.

A9044 Greased Tendon Evaluations. There is an interchange of information and personnel as needed between the two programs.

6. REPORTING SCHEDULE:

Publications in FY-1982.

Not applicable.

Expected future reports

" Evaluation of Containment Leak Rate Testing Criteria" (Draft to be submitted to NRC September,1983).

7. SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION:

Not applicable.

l 8. LIST NEW CAPITAL EQUI-PMENT REQUIRED:

Not applicable.

9. DESCRIBE SPECIAL FACILITIES REQUIRED:

Not applicable.

4 7 ex. r m e. .. e UCN t abotu

() 9 ei !

PROJECT AND DUDGET PROPOSAL FOR NRCWORK

, B0489 () {

PH0JL CT TIT LL.

C0flTAlf!MEi!T LEAK RATE TESTIliG v

. ITEM NO.

10. CONFLICT 0F INTEREST INFOR!GTI0ft:

There are' no known relationships between this organization or its employees with industries related to the NRC and suppliers thereof that might give rise to an apparent or actual conflict of interest regarding the work described in this proposal.

11. OBLIGATION EXPEliSES:

Obligation Estimates Operating Expenses FY-1982 FY-1983 FY-1984 FY-1985

~

13 1 37 0 0 (1) Cost Estimates (2) Goods and Services on 137 0 Order-G50 Estimate 0 0 Less: Uncosted Balance 0 1 37 0 0 9/30 GS0 Change 137 (137) 0 0 150 0 0 0 (3) TOTAL OBLIGATIONS-CHANGE

12. OTHER (Specify):

12(a). QUALITY ASSURAliCE AfiD CONTROL:

Hot applicable.

12(b). COST AND MILESTONE CHARTS A. PROJECT COST SCHEDULE Total Prior Estimated Costs Years 1982 1983 1984 .1985 1986 Cost Task A 0 13 37 0 0 0 50 Task B 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 Task"C.~ 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 Task D 0 0 30 0 0 0 30 Task E 0 0 30 0 0 0 30 B. 189 SUBTASK / MILESTONE CHARTS PASe FIN Page of U[/.SI l.

, i  ;

?:: -N 2wb . x g o # e C.E 1f8

. . o oC' .-sS A r.

S

- 0

?j g-D

- N O

YY EE B ,

. y p

y p

y .

p y  :

p y

p 4

4 8 3 Y 2

. F 1

E 4 L

U 3 8

3 ' r F D Y  ? p p F E F 2 F_.

H v C

S 1

v_

p E

N 4 r_.

O 23 T

s 8 E Y 2 L F I

M

/

1 K , x s s d i A n d e od s T l o e s t n m B a i s o e ee s o p t p tb U k c no cp

. S e

a t n

i p

i v

d e

p o

r orp r eA p

i.fl d L a y e s J ou v t h R o p s o sh t e t p . . ne f x et o n . f i J oJ nJ ohJ i ri nh e s l

e o w r o it 1 d w os m t r x px x t x 8 n h n n g s . i i yi afi 9 e t s i t 'h e n ws d fd rd dod 1 p it ac i

a m f

o i ee n on an n ese n -

8 A p wc ih ni e s e e t e i E

t n r w s ii vt p wp np ep mtp mcp wl ef mw r

N o i g e rr p ep 6 h eJ O C u i n ea A iA mA oeA 5 t in T q v t t p v m cp i vo t ex S g e e i n d eo oo eso S w ec E

n R r w id e rt ct rat N r di L

e s A y l d .

I M

i t g e ". e et o en en ecn / t ea ti end t ee

/

s n ts t t s p t o t o ti o I i e pd K e ee o ei ei efi S l et s i i et .

N l n l pu A x t l r l s l r r l s l s li s i pe pal E s po pt pe P pi pi pci A b T

B e mp ms mt mv mv mev ope i mt oo m

onn c

U w T oe oe on w oe oe w a t .

S e Cr Ct Ci e C r C r Csr e p C pJ Cii i

i e i v v m v t e . e o . .

e a . . .

a c R c a b R R a b c R b A B C

)

b k k k

( s s s 2 a a a 1 T T T

o. . . .

N 1 2 3 n "

i$,,:

i , c J' , , 51 ,i

, ,' l ij; l

1 . 4 4 1 , .

5ii *:

5 0 $ g.ao5 uh. -

,e, +ro g N 1d8.

% O 358 D

N O

YY EF B

y y

y p

- y p

y ,

. p 4

4 3

.

• 3 Y 2

. F 1

r 3 .

E 4 v.. .

L

. U 3

83 r.

D Y E 2 ..

F H

C 1 S

E 4 N

O 23 T 8 s

E Y 2 L F IM

/

1 K

. S A t T t

. B r n f U o e a S f m e r

ne

. s at u d in a l f

so ft a

- yi os v o

- l s ai tt f t nv nc o n .

Ae ea e R mp n . m t pm ot t p E cd oi i n r o N ae l - se o l O ps ee im p e .

. T mo vu ve e vt S I p el et R er E - o da ra do p

L er v t l ee I

M uP e~ es a

/ l tl t n t r K aJ ea et i e S l c F ll A V li pa pa T x pt mp e mn ei mi B

U dd on om Ci d

i oi Cf S i n Ci ve v op o rp . . r .

. PA a b P a D E

)

b k k

( s s 2 a a

. 1 T T O. .

N 4 5 g i g,'d f4 1 O. N

, 4 .

? i

] - , jj 1

ELEMENTS OF COST SCHEDULE ) For Oceratina Excense:

. t. ,WPAS-FIELD TASX PROPOSAL /AGPEEMENT5 Budnet Outlay AND WORK FOR OTHERS ESTIMATES

~ (B/0) O (Dollars in 'Ihousa xis)

WOtystIrr '

41 10 01 06 Rt50Lett psots AM Activ!TV N0. ,. , , , p o CH ECK: ae SE*'t 'rore'ai ii'8 8 eset '* ores i ET (16) pat r aag g e, cat E pmEpanE D D. J. Naus J. R.

peswcas e s sesbE 5 7 83 A 'C an ougaii 5/1R/R2 tocaa u (FTP/A #' "E B0489 Containment Leak Rate Testing FISC AL YE AR ESTIMATES F Y 19 8 2 F Y 19 8 3 FY 19 %

511MM ARY BY M A JOR E LE ME NTS 5 PY $ PY S PY C COST CENTERS .

7 0.1 80 1.0 0 0 E

i N INTRA OlVISION COST CENTERS 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 E INTER Divt!!C'l CCST CENTERS 0 0 0 0 0 0

- R 3

5 TOT AL - COST CENTERS 7 0.1 80 1.0 0 0 A

4 M

TRAVEL 3 "D M.b 7 I I f"8 4

5 A T

MAJOR MATERIALS NON EXEMPT h k* .&

Jf 5&$

6 E MAJOR MATERIALS . EXEMPT f[e> f,c

'hx

[N3*;;

R f y.3 i 40 3 i f' 3yj 7

A L

COMPUTER & PROGRAMMING 5ERvlCES

$.g I

gg h

8 HOT CELLS SERVICES 5 ]up.R ,gj

,- $y,,pf -@3 sp 9 REACTCR SERvtCES .

$@,{ $yfg

,.d.rgy b&

ww fb r pl 10 5

UTILITY PURCHASED POWER EXEMPT O! LY

.}fk ;i  %.y y.it;

.y E

SPECIALCOST DISTRIBUTIONS Eye.'PT 11 g l. ,,.> %,f;$ -.

,+. . a av{.

12 Y

SUFPLIE!. 20P5 & MAINTENANCE '.iATERIAL .$IJ MM  %,

.hme l .w -

C ORNL SUPPORT SERVICES:

13 E

P&l:: DIVISION I&C DI'/ISION INSPECTION ENGINEERING OTHER DIld'CT 14 OTHER UC-ND P!. ANT SUPPORT (.fyl5[ I 2M M

&.3a-r.3

-  ;<  ; *f .T 15 GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 'd[5?i  ?> M .fi E5 Item E CM' ITAL EQUIPMENT ($3000 or less) f .% a l >.w.,

l.kkb%@'h 16 fi i' In%];

@ 'l$.

i; OTHER COSTS Tis HP. WASTE DISP.UTIL.& OlV DISTR

. 15 IEW 19 TOTAL- MATERIALS AND SERVICES 3 0 25 0 0 0

';i.Q s .

.i:'

19 C R10 50BCONTRACTS & CONSULTANTS NCN EXE' APT .M Q r<j i ,

g; ,

. x,q

.ao :h o

, s. *

.g W 2:?

N R& D SUBCCNTRACT$ . EXEMPT l -J.gv0

.1.yg :

g-be[,j T i -

pjy,

(  ?! TOTAL . R & D 5UBCONTRACT5 & CCNS ULTANTS 0 0

[Q{ 0 g a SusT0TAL 10 0.1 105 1.0 0 0

-&  ?. @

U . coEC' Cc5TS c t a A',o CPS 3 dN 32 $y.. ..> d 0 3

GR A.',D T C T AL 13 - - - -

0.1 137 l 1.0 l 0 l0

i : ) Appendix "D"

'f OR!iL TEC:I:lICAL / FIN ANCI A L INFORn ATION SYST EM (FY 1984) Q PTP N O. PPOD TTTLE (SHO RT) DATE B r.R NO.

. (,' 40 10 01 06 B0489 1 Containr6ent Leat Rate Testina 5 /2_0_/ 82 TITLE: c o.n_tains.tt.. Lea t_hte_ hitina. __ __ _____ -=_______ ___ _

A D: _D__B. Jraugnr _

FUNDIHG AGENCY: ((gc f rt ______ __ __ ____

TcoDE: ____ DI S ECT ION : W id Mochnnics PC (s) : _ h us .D_ d ____ -

PI(s) : 10D3_Daug;ul._J _2 =_ _ _ ___ _ _ _ = _ ---_____ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ABSTRACT: _lE _Echimm - n ral space is needed please use the back of this fors)

(If addition The program objective is to evaluate the practicability of the containment leak testing program, and the compatibility of regulatory requirements and industry testing standards.

Existing containment leak, rate testing regulatory requirements will be reviewed as well as programs which have been conducted in compliance with these requirements. Af!SI/ANS 56.8-1981 and the proposed revision to Appendix J will be reviewed. A value-impact analysis will be provided for the entire proposed Appendix J. revision.

KEYWORDS: (CIRCLE on attached keyword list)

TYPE OF ACTIVITY: (Indicate t - must add to 100%) 5. Engineering Dev (7 10 __

f0 _

1. Basic Fesearch

2. Applied Research

3. Exploratory Dev

4. Advanced Dev TECH'! OLOGY: (Indicate % - must add to 10 0'.)

1. Coal 7. LMFBR ___ 13. Geothermal

8. LWR 14 Conse rv atio n

___ 2. Oil and Gas JDO.

9. Gas cooled React

15. Apply to all Tech

__ _ 3 . Oil Shale ___

10. Other Fission

16. Long Range /

___ 4 Radiation Damage . , _ _

5. Nuclear Waste 11. Fusion Tech Related

6. Puel Cycle ___

12. S ola r INITIATTVES: (T ndicate T - need notBiotechnology add to 100Y) Dev .

11. Acid Pain

1. Water 6.

2. Combustion 7 Biomass ___ 12. Risk Assessment

1. Natorials 9. Eastern Shales ___ 13. Toxicology .

4. Lif e Sci /Sy n Fuel ___

9. Environ Geosci ___ 14 Biogeochemical Cyc

__ S . 'nviron Control

10. Hazardous Waste RFSERVES B0 ,

DTVISION: j 6 __E_ngi neeriita_ Techn_ojpgy_______

FY 19 32 FY 1983 FY 1994 FTE REV EST FTE SUBMIT FTE DESCRIPTION REV EST Financial Plan 13 P ro s Bu d g e t _1_3_7_

Total '10 r. FIE 13 0 .1 137 ___L.D _ _ ___._

S ubcon tr.ict _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____

Maior Materials ______ ______

3

< CSD Service _

k Engr Service ______ _ _ _ _ ____

PCE and OD PY . ______ ______

IT.C an 1 OD PY . . _ _ _ _ _ ____._

Capital ?qu.ip. ______ ______ _ _ _ _

Bn and SsT 0 .1 1. 0 .

tdiC Page D1 of 8

• l

.i O ORNL TECll'11C AL / FIN A NCIAL INFOR!1 ATION SYSTEM (FY 1984) o KEYWORDS 1 ACCELERATOR 45 C O GE !1E R ATIO N 2 ACID R AIN 46 COLLISIONS 3 ACTINIDES 47 COMBUSTION 4 ACTIVE SOL AR 48 COMMUNITY ENERGY SYSTE!!S 5 AEROSOLS 44 COMPATIBILITY 6 AFDC MATERIALS 50 COMPOSITES 270 AGING .

51 C09PUTER CODES 7 AIR CONDITIONING 52 COMPUTER GRAPHICS 8 AIR QUALITY 53 CONCENTRATION FACTORS 4 A LCOH OLS 54 COOLING TOWERS 10 ALLOYS 55 CORROSION 11 ALTERN ATE CYCLES 56 CROP RESIDUES 12 ALTERN ATIVE ENERGY SO URCE 57 CROSS SECTIONS

. 13 AMORPH 0!!S ROC 5*. 58 CRYOGENICS 14 ANNEALING 59 CPYSTALS 16 ARCilITECTUPE 60 DATA DASES 27 1 ASSESSMENT 61 DECOMMISSIONING 18 A r1 Gelt 62 DECONTAMINATION 19 BARYONS 63 DEFECTS 20 BASE TECHNOLOGY 64 DEFENSE 21 BATTERIES 65 DEPOBMATION 22 BIOC11E MIST RY 66 DEMAND

(., 23 BIO *iASS ENERGY 67 D E PO SI TIO N 24 DIOPH OTOT.YSI S 6 DESIG,D

?S BIOTECH!!OLOG7 69 DEVELOPMENT 272 BLOOD 70 DIELECTRICS 6 BU ILD IN r7S) 71 DIESEL Q'7 2 CARDIDES 72 DIFFRACTION 28 C A RD0!! DIOTTDE 73 DIFFUSION 29 C ARCINOGE NES IS 74 DT SPER SIO N 273 CARDIOVASCULAR DISEA S E 75 DISTRICT HEATING TO C AT ALYSIS 76 DNA 31 CELLULOSE 77 DNA REPAIR 32 CERAMICS 78 DOSIMETRY ,

13 C I! AN N ELIN G 79 ECOSYSTEMS .

34 CHATTANOOG4 SHALE 90 EIS 15 CilEMIC AT. DEV ELOPMENT R1 Ei.ECTRICITY 36 CilE!!ISTRY 82 EL ECTR 001!EMIST R Y 37 CHP01 ATOGR APitY 83 ELECTRONS 10 CH R01050:1E' D AM AGE 04- ELMO DU5PY TORUS 39 CO AL CONV ER*iION 85 E MIS SI ON S

'40 CO AL FLUIDIZED BED 86 EN GI N E ER I NG EYPERIMENTS 41 CO AL G ASIFIC ATION R7 ENTRAINMEllT 42 COAL LIQUEFACTION 8 '1 ENVIRON CONTROL TECII 41 COAL PREP AR ATION 89 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 44 COAL VASTES 90 ENSYMES

(

NRC Page D3 of 8

, O

.l ORNL TEC!!NIC AL / FIN A NCI AL IMPORM ATIO!I SY ST Et1 (FY 1904) c .

KEYWORDS continued 274 EPIDEMIOLOGY 135 INTERN ATION AL COOPER ATION 91 EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT 136 ION 92 F AULT TREES 137 ION EX CH AllG E 93 FIBER OPTICS 138 ION IMPLANTATION 94 FILTR ATIO N 139 IONIZATION 95 FINITE ELEMENT NETHODS 140 IONIZING RADIATION 96 FISH -

141 19 RADIATION 97 FISSION PRODUCTS 142 ISOTOPES 98 FLOW 143 KINETICS 99 PLUIDIZATION 144 LAND USE 100 FLUIDS 145 LANTHANIDES 101 FLn0RESCENCE 146 LASERS 102 FORESTS 147 L ATTICE DYN AMICS

. 103 FRACTURE 148 LEACHING

, 104 PUEL CELLS 149 LOW LEVEL W ASTE 105 GENERATORS 150 MASS SPECTROMETRY 106 GENETICS 151 MATERIALS ENGINEERING 107 GERM CELLS 152 M ATERI ALS SCIENCE 100 G R AP!!ITE 153 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES 109 G R EEN!!Of!S ES 154 M EMB RA NES 110 Il CO A T. 155 METALS HADRONS 156 M ETH AN E

( ', 111 112  !!E ALTl! EFFECTS 157 METHANOL 113 IIEAT EXCHANGERS 153 METHODS DEVELOPMENT 114 IIE AT PUMP 159 M ICR OD RG A llIS MS 115 HE AT R ECD VER Y 160 1ICROSCOPY 116 HEAT TRANSFER 161 MIGRATION 117 IIEAVY IONS 162 MODEL AN ALYSIS 1 111 llE LIll M 163 MODELING 119 HFIR 164 MODULAR STRUCTURES 120  !!!!IDF 16 5_ M O L,T_EN SALTS 121 H IGli EN".RGY 6 I10NITORING)

~

122 IIIGli VOLT AGE @F7'Mbi15GBOUNDARIES 1

123 HY D90C ARBON S 16R M11TA G E NES IS 124 IlY DRO EL ECTRI C 169 NATIONAL EN ERGY PL ANNING 125 ItYD90 GEN 170 NEUTRINOS 126 H Y ORO LOF.V 171 N EUTRO NICS 127 'iY DP 0 TR E A TIN G 172 NEUTRONS 129 IGNEOUS RO,CK 173, NITROGEN DIDXIDES 129 T M MU N O LOG Y. , 174 NGMDESTPUCTIVE TESTI!IG 110 TMPINGEMENT 175 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS 131 INDUSTRIAL CONSERV ATION 176 OPERATIONS 275 INDUSTRIAL FYGIENE 177 OTEC STPUCTURES 178 OXIDATION W)33 2---IMO.Y1T T V ETNSTRUMENYW 170 OYYGEN 180 OZONE NT 134 INST 1LATTON 1

(

MC Pace N of 8

OR'iL TECH .iCAL / FIN A NCI AL INPOR N?.TIO:I ST E!' {YY 1984)

'T

• p KE YWORDS continuerl A.

181 P ARTICULA TES 225 SI LICATES 192 PASSIVE SOLAR 226 SKIN 193 PERMEATION 227 SOLID 1ECHANICS 184 P H AR M ACOLOGY 22R SOLID WASTES 195 P l! AS ES 229 SOLI DI FIC ATION 186 P110 Spit ATES 230 SOLUBILITY 187 PHOT 0 CHEMISTRY 231 SOLVENT EXTR ACTION 190 PHOT 0 ELECTRON 232 SORPTION 199 P!10T3'IS 231 SPECTROP!!OTOMET RY 234 "

190 Pl!OTOVOLTT ACS ROS_OPY 19 1 P HYSICS 5 STA NDA RDS 192 PL ASM A 236 STsan 193 PLUTONIUM 237 STEELS 194 POLICY AN ALYSIS 230 STORAGE 19 5 POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARDO NS 239 STRUCTURE

. 196 POLYMERS 240 SULFUS 197 POSITRON 241 SilPERCON D UCTORS 194 POWER PLANT) 242 SURF ACE 9 PRDUTUTI. T TT 243 SII RP AC TA !!TS 200 PROCESS DEVELOPMENT 244 S Y NC HR OT R ON 201 P RO C ES S I'.S 245 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 202 DROTEINS 246 TEMPERATURE 203 PYROLYSIS 247 TERAT 0 GENESIS C_' 204 RADIOACTIVE 248 T ilER M0 DY N A MICS 276 R A DI0P H ARM A C EUTIC ALS 249 T!!ORIU M 205 RCRA 250 TilREE MILE ISL AND 206 REACTOS POEL DEVELOPMENT 251 TOSCA

!M7 RE ACTOR S AFETY) 252 TO XICO LO GY

20 8' RECOVElif 253 TR AN SFOR t4 AT IOM 209 DEPPACTORY 254 TRANSP0FT 210 PEGIO NA L _ Ati& LYSIS 255 TH A N SPORT ATIO'l 11 R EGilL ATIO'$,T 256 TRANSURANICS '

[712 -

R EPRO C ESS I!iG 257 259 TRANSURANIUM TRITIUM

'177 D E PRO D UC? T09 *

(213 H TSr ASSESS!!E!!TD 259 HLTRAVIOLET RADIATION

• 215 hNA 260 UP ANItti 21" SAFEGitARDS 261 W ASTE ENEEGY llTILIZATION

.d16 S AFETY) 262 WASTE ISOLATION 217 S A LT REPOSITORY 261 WASTE MANAGE'tSNT 210 SC ATT ER IN G, 264, W ASTEW ATER TRE ATMENT 270 S C4 EEN IN G 265 WATER AVAILADILITY 270 SEDIMENTS 266 WATER CllEMISTRY 221 SEPAR ATION PROCESSES 267 W ATE R QtJ A LITY 222 S ERVICES 263 W ELD ING 223 S il A L E 269 X-EAY 224 SilIELDING N.

NRC Pace D5 of 8 i

l

insi sa' ~ f" T -

06-01-82

(-

' 8 "

. l ) JECT AND BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR NRL JRK q NEw

• - O REV1310N NO.

PROJECT TITLE: FIN NUMBER CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE TESTING B0489 NRC OFFICE NRC B & R NUMBER Nuclear Regulatory Research 60-82-248 DOE CONT R AC TO R U" "^ U""'

PATENT STATUS UNION CARBIDE CORPOR ATION This proposalis being transmitted in advaner of paten, ACT. M M s s M site review for erotuation purposes only. No further osv. {l6)

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY h!,',"j"p',h ",forfpu

,ht""js s'ia en ro ou //

DOE B & R NUMBER OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE 37830 Patents. DOE. 40 10 01 06 COGNIZANT PERSONNEL ORGANIZATION FTS PHONE NUMBER PERIOD OF PERFORM ANCE NRC PROJECT MANAGER STARTING DATE E. G. Arndt MSEB 443-5860 06-01-82 OTHER NRC TECHNICAL STAFF g COMPLETION DATE 09-30-83 DOE PROJECT M ANAGER W. R. Bibb D0E-0R0 626-0742 CONT R ACTOR /O RNL PROG. DIR.: A. L. Lotts cMn 624-0422 PROG. MG R.: F. J. Homan MAC Division 624-5169 PROJ. MG R.: D. J. Naus ET Division 624-0657 PRIN. INVESTIGATOR (S)d.R. Dougan ET Division 624-0650 G. C. Robinson ET Division 624-0649 STAFF YE ARS OF EFFORT (Round tonearesttenthofayear) FY 1982 FY 19 8 3 FY 1984 FY 19 8 5 F Y 19 86 Direct Scientific /Technica' O.1 1.0 0 0 0 Oiner Direc' 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL DIRECT STAFF YEARS 0.1 1.0 0 0 0 COST PROPOSAL (OBLIGATIONS) { $ in Thousands ) ,

Direct Salaries (Cost Centers) 7 80 0 0 0 Material and Services (Excluding ADP) 0 0 15 0 0 ADP Support 0 3 0 0 0 Sukontracts and Consultants 0 0 0 0 0

Travel Expenses

*" O O O O O comestic t 7 n n n Indirect Labor Costs (Cost Centers) ther (Specify) 0 0 GS0 N g 0 0 0 Generat and Administrative (G&A/ GPS) 0 0 0 3 32 TOTAL OPERATING COST (Obligations) 137 0 0 0 13 _

C APIT AL EQUIPMENT fin CH ARGED: 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PROJECT COST (Obligations) 13 1 37 0 0 0

" l9dd OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY M A RCH 12 12 13 10 10 10 MONTHLY FORECAST APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER

'"'"5' 10 10 10 13 14 13 Page FIN Page of

~

UCN ta50S is e sit r f)

- lg .

*** B0489

[3 s . 3 DATE

- PROJECT AND .JDGET PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 06-01-82 b PROJECT TITLCr

. CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE TESTING 000 PROPOS*NG ORG ANIZ ATION: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY OAK RIDGE. TENNESSEE 37830 FORECAST MILESTONE CHART; Schedute to Start- L . -Completed (shown in Quarter Year)

PROVIDE ESTtM ATED oOLL AR COST FOR E ACH TASK FOR F ACH FtSC AL YE AR FY 1982 FY 19 83 FY 1984 FY 1985 FY 19 86 1st l2nd l3rd l4th 1st l 2ndl 3rd l 4th 1st l2nd l 3rd l 4th 1st l2ndl 3rd l4th 1st l2nd l 3rd l4th A. Review existing sessoute L 1.

containment leak rate '

testing requirements. cost 13 37 B. Review proposed seseOute H Appendix .' revisions.

. COST 20 C. Review ANSI /ANS sessoute M 56.8-1981 for compati-bility with Appendix J cost 20 D. Provide value-impact scueouts M analysis for Appendix J proposed revision. cost 30 E. Provide final sessoutt ML report.

cost 30 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 13 137 0 0 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (Provide narrative descriptions on N RC Form 189 page 3 of 3 for the f ollowing topics in the order listed.

Check applicable block. If an item is not apolicable, so state.)

b 1. OBJECTIVE OR PROPOSED WORK 9. DESCRIBE SPECIAL FACILITIES REQUIRED

2.

SUMMARY

0F PRIOR EFFORTS 10. CONFLICT 0F INTEREST INFORMATION

3. WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND EXPECTED RESULTS Il.0BLIGATION ESTIMATES

4. DESCRIPTION OF ANY FOLLOW-ON EFFORTS 12. 0TH E R (SPECIFY/:

b 5. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PRbJECTS b 6. REPORTING SCHEDULE

7. SUBCONTR ACTO R INFO RMATIOR

8. LIST NEW CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED APPROVAL AUTHORITY SIGN ATU RE DATE l

Page FIN Page of UCN tetos A (s 9-89 )

unc eo- - . ...-__

• 3 8 PROJECT AND; PGET PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK ) O l PROJECT TITLE:

CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE TESTING 4 TEM NO.

1. OBJECTIVE OF PROPOSED WORK:

Summary The program objective is to evaluate the practicability of the containment leak testing program, and the compatibility of regulatory requirements and industry testing standards. Existing containment leak rate testing regulatory require-ments will be reviewed as well as programs which have been conducted in com-pliance with these requirements. Field and licensing experience will be utilized.

ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 and the proposed revision to Appendix J of 10 CFR 50 will be reviewed. A valte-impact analysis will be provided for the entire proposed Appendix J revision.

Additional Information In 1981 a national standard was issued providing detailed recommendations on the test procedures and analyses. Some of the positions in the proposed revisions should be reviewed in depth against field and licensing experiences of the past decade. Observations and recommendations resulting from such a review would either validate the positions in the proposed revision, or would provide a basis for modifying such positions.

2.

SUMMARY

OF PRIOR EFFORTS:

Not applicable.

3. WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND EXPECTED RESULTS:

Summary Existing contaiment leak rate testing regulatory requirements will be reviewed, as well as the programs conducted in compliance with these requirements, using field and licensing experience. The proposed revision to Appendix J will be reviewed and recomendations provided. ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981, " Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements," will be reviewed for compatibility with the proposed Appendix J revision. A value-impact analysis will be provided for the entire proposed Appendix J revision, as prepared for public comment issue, addressing the value and impact on thelicensees, the licensing process, and the public. After the public comment period, the value-impact analysis will l

be revised, as required.

l '

l FY-1983 Work will be completed on all tasks. Task A includes a review of the following:

(1) relevant licensing exemption reports and exemptions granted; (2) relevant

- license event reports; (3) types A, B and C test reports complete with field data; (4) witnessing of at least one of each of the three type tests; (5) inter-views withlicensees, non-utility organizations that perform leak rate tests, and architectural-engineering firms that design containments and plant systems; and (6) discussions with appropriate NRC groups. Task B includes a review of the proposed revision to Appendix J, a general commentary on the proposed revision, and recomendations on specific aspects of the proposed revision FIN Page of 7 Page UCN t 45058 (3 9 81 l

NRC F OnM 189 U.S. t<UCLE A R HLGULAl uw v L0r.twdStuN i 1:4 a dv...ut u a PROJECT ANC DGET PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK B0489 g PROJECT TITLE:

CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE TESTING tTEM NO.

[ containment integrated leak rate test (CILRT) pressure, CILRT frequency, CILRT duration, CILRT reporting requirements, local leak testing, verification testing, test temperature for valves, and waiting period following valve closure before leak testing]. Task C includes a review of ANSI /ANS 56.8,-1981. wit.h respect to potential conflicts with the proposed revision to Appendir J, and a determination if any of the Appendix J contents belong instead in ANSI /ANS 56.8--1981. Task D includes development and revision, after public comment, of a value-impact statement for the proposed Appendix J revision. Task E includes development of a final report summarizing results of the study.

FY-1984 s Work under this study ,ill be completed in FY-1983.

4. DESCRIPTION OF ANY F0LLuW-0N EFFORTS:

A potential follow-on effort of this study would be a probabilistic risk assessment.

The assessment would include an evaluation of the consequences of a change in the present leakage rate limitations.

5. RELATIONSHIPS TO OTHER PROJECTS:

The work described herein has a relationship to work and personnel of project No.

A9044 Greased Tendon Evaluations. There is an interchange of information and personnel as needed between the two programs.

6. REPORTING SCHEDULE:

Publications in FY-1982.

Not applicable.

Expected future reports

" Evaluation of Containment Leak Rate Testing Criteria" (Draft to be submitted to NRC September,1983).

7. SUBCONTRACTOR INFORMATION:

Not applicable.

8. LIST NEW CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED:

Not applicable.

9. DESCRIBE SPECIAL FACILITIES REQUIRED: -

Not applicable.

4 7 p... n N p. .. or UCN 145095 (3 9 89 l

• U.5. NUC LL.4H H LL,UL Al utt Y COf.1!aidssvra e lh I su...ULit N'sC F ORM 189

[a***s$ f' PROJECT AND, DGET PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK I B0489 o PROJECT TITLE:

CONTAINMENT LEAK RATE TESTING l ITEM NO.

10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST INFORMATION:

There are no known relationships between this organization or its employees with industries related to the NRC and suppliers thereof that might give rise to an apparent or actual conflict of interest regarding the work described in this proposal.

11. OBLIGATION EXPENSES:

Obligation Estimates Operating Expenses FY-1982 FY-1983 FY-1984 FY-1985 13 137 0 0 (1) Cost Estimates (2) Goods and Services on 0 Order-GS0 Estimate 0 0 0 Less: Uncosted Balance 0 0 0 0 9/30 GS0 Change 0 0 0 0 13 137 0 0 (3) TOTAL OBLIGATIONS-CHANGE

12. OTHER (Specify):

12(a). QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL: .

Not applicable. ,

12(b). COST AND MILESTONE CHARTS A. PROJECT COST SCHEDULE Total Prior Estimated Costs Years 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 Cost Task A 0 13 37 0 0 0 50 Task B 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 Task C 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 Task D 0 0 30 0 0 0 30 Task E O O 30 0 0+ 0 30 B. 189 SUBTASK / MILESTONE CHARTS P.,. FIN Page of UC N-t e SOS S (3 9 St )

fig , .!

.x 5' T 4

eAh r3sye .

E $". s u I 5.

" 3g g

O

. D N

O YY EF B

y .

p y

p y

p y

p y

p

. 4 4

8 3 Y 2 F

1 E 4 L 3 U 8 3 r r F D

E Y F 2 7-p' p s..

F H v C 1 S ' F..

E 4 I p -'

N .

O 2 3 T 8 s

E Y 2 L F .

MI

/

1 K , x s s d i s

A n d e od T l o e s tn m B a i s o e ee U k c s o p tp tb S d p no cp i a t i p

i v e o orp eA d e n y e s r r J p fl L a p s o sh ouo v t h R o x t e t p . . ne f et ri nh n . l f i J oJ nJ ohJ i e s e o w r o i t 1 d w os m t r x px x t x 8 n h i n n g s . i i yi afi 9 e ts th e f n ws d fd rd d od p it ac i

a m o i ee n on an n n 1- p wci ni t e s ii e e te ese 8 A ih E n r w s vt p wp np mtp wl ef mw r

N o i e e rr p ep ep mcp 6 h eJ O C u i n ea A iA mA oeA cp 5 t in vo T q v t t p v m i ec t

ex S g e e i n d eo oo eso S w E

L n R r w id e rt ct rat N y

r di i - e s A l d .

I M t g e . e et o en en ecn / t ea end t ee

/

s n ts t ts p to t o ti o I i ti K ee o efi S et e pd S i i et e . r ei ei li s N l

i l n l pu A x t l r l s l r pe P l s pi l s pi pci A b pe pal T E s po pt B e mp ms mt mv mv mev ope i mt oo .

m onn c

U w T oe oe on w oe oe w e a t

C pJ Cii S e Cr Ct Ci e Cr Cr Csr p

i e i v

' i v m v t e o e a . . . e . . .

a R R a b c R a b c R c b A B C

)

b k k k

( s s s 2 a a a 1 T T T O. . . .

N 1 2 3 8 5

,5 y% m "

U $

'l il r1 5 i5 $. c5!

. 2 nS g s8A r~ - EE g l9 e 0 i 8.

D N

. O YY EF B

y .

p y

p y

y p

y

. p 4

4 3 8

Y 2

F 1

P E 4 y. J.

L U

3 3

v .

8 .

D Y E F 2 ...

H C 1 S -

E 4 w

N O 23 T 3 S

E Y 2 L F I .

M

/

1 K

s A .

T t B r n f

t U o e S f m - a ne e r s at u d i n a l f

so ft a yi os v o l s ai tt f t

- o n nv nc e Ae ea mp R n . m t pm ot t p E cd oi i n r o N ae l - se o l O ps ee i m p e .

T S

mo I p vu el ve et R e vt er E - o d,a ra do p

L er v t l I

M uP e es a ee

/ l tl t n t r K

S aJ ea et i e V li l c F ll A x pt pa pa T

B ei mi mp e mn U dd on Ci om d Cf oi

. S in Ci i ve v .

op rp . .

o r .

PA a b P a D E

')

b k k

( s s

. 2 a a 1 T T O. . .

N 4 5 E ,2 ~ 9 N

c D  ?

j! i1 .  ; i

PROGRAM AND BUDGET PROPOSAL

. ELEMENTS OF COST SCHEDULE ' For Operating Expenses WR WPAS-FIELD TASK PROPOSAL /AGREEMENI) Budget Outlay AND WORK FOR OTHERS ESTIMATES (B/0) A (Dollars in Thousards) U wowsarr Y 41 10 01 06 t!53LtCf PACK.8AM Attivite no, e. . .s.o CH ECK: Ca+= Ideet 'consal O '$ee e.eget Processi ET (16) ,

"'D'."'I."N a u s " U .dougan 5/18/R2 l i

Y L E '

CONTa:'t no. (FTP/A # :

B0489 Containment Leak Rate Testing FISC AL YE AR ESTIMATES l F Y 19 82 F Y 19 8 3 FY 19 814

$UMM ARY BY M AJOR E LEMENTS 5 l PY $ l PY $ l PY C

E COST CENTERS .. 7 l 0.1 80 l 1.0 0 l0 g l g 1

N INTRA O! VISION COST CENTERS 0 10 0 10 0 10 2 E R

INTER OlVislCN COSTCENTERS 0 l0 0 l0 0 l0 3

5 TOTAL - COST CENTERS 7 0.1 80 1.0 0 l

4 TRAVEL 3 7 M

5 A uAJOR MATERIALS NON EXEMPT ,

T 6 E uAJOR MATERIALS EXEMPT llh ,

COMPUTER & PROGRAMMING SERVICES E 3 8 L HOT CELLS SERVICES f

(.

\..

9 5

REACTOR SERvlCES l g' l

- & g 10 UTILITY PURCHASED P0nER EXEVPT ONLY l E

ll R SPECIALCOST 015TRIBUT10NS EXEVPT Y

17 SUPPLIES. SHOPS & MAINTENANCE MATERIAL I

[ C ORNL SUPPORT SERVICES:

l P&E DIVISION l l I&C DIVISION l l l INSPECTION ENGINEERING l l l OTHER DIRECT l l l g

OTHER UC-ND PLANT SUPPORT GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 16 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ($300uMess) p OTHER COSTS Tis. HP WASTE DISP.UTIL.& OlV DisiR Mf TOTAL MATERIALS AND $ERVICES 3 l0 25 l0 0 l0 19 C R&D SUBCONTRACT 5 & CONSULTANTS NON EXEMPT EL'd 5 MI N R & D SUBCONTR ACTS - EX E? APT 0 2

- 0 s 0 V

{ 21 TOTAL R10 SUBCONTRACTS & CONSULTANTS 27 SUBTOTAL 10 l 0. 1 105 1.0 0 l0 M 1N0! RECT COSTS . C & A AND GPS 3 EM 32 M 0 E8d d '

CRANO TOTAL 13 l 0. 1 137 1.0 0 l0 ma'. _

unnu 4 u e.. m o , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . ,

BER N O ., FTP h .' PPOB TTTLE o dORT) DATE h 40 10 01 06 B0489 Containment Leak Rate Testjnq 5 /2_0_/ 82

.( - . TITLE: Cg.n_t3 i_qmerit.,J,gd_8,q,t_e Tes ti_rtg___

1 AD: _D. R. T.raugo,- __ FUNDING AGENCY: NRC/MRP _ _ _ _____

TCODE: ___ DI SECTION: Rnlid Mnchanics PC(s) : __Han s D . 1 ,___ ___ __ ______ _ _ _ =

PI(s) : ],QQ3_Daugan _d__B __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

_1D3 _Rohinenn n r ABSTRACT: (If additional space is needed please use the back of this form)

The program objective is to evaluate the practicability of the containment leak testing program, and the compatibility of regulatory requirements and industry testing standards.

Existing containment leak rate testing regulatory requirements will be reviewed as well as programs which have been conducted in compliance with these requirements. ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 and the proposed revision to Appendix J will be reviewed. A value-impact analysis will be provi,ded for the entire proposed Appendix J. revision.

KEYWORDS: (CIRCLE on attached keyword list)

TYPE OF ACTIVITY: (Indicate 1 - must add to 100%) 5. Engineering Dev C~.

10 _

1. Basic Pesearch ___

3. Exploratory Dev __

{0__ 2. Applied Research __

4. Advanced Dev TECHNnLOGY: (In d ica te % - must add to 10 0'.)

___ 1. Coal 7. LMFBR ___ 13. Geothermal

__ 2. Oil and Gas JDQ 8. LWR __ 14. Conse rvatio n

___ 3. Oil Shale ___

9. Gas Cooled React ___

15. Apply to all Tech 4 Radiation Damage 10. Other Fission ___

16. Long Range / .

. 5. Nuclear Waste 11. Fusion Tech Related

___ 6. Fuel Cycle ___

12. S ola r INITIATIVES: (indicate T - need notBiotechnology add to 100') Dev Acid Pain

1. Water __

6. __11.

7 Biomass 12. Risk Assessment

___ 2. Combustion ___

8. Eastern shales

13. Toxicology

't . Materials __ __

Biogeochemical Cyc 4 Life Sci / Syn Fuel _ _ 9. Environ Geosci ___

14

___ 5. Environ con trol 10. Hazardous Waste R YS ERV ES BD __ __

DIVISION: 16 Engineering _ Technol og_____

FY 19 32 FY 1983 FY 1984

,.REV EST FTE REV EST FTZ SUBMIT FTE DESC3IPTION Financial Plan 13 Pres Budget 137 Total 30 n FTE __l_3_ 0 .1 137 _ __], . D _ _ _ _ ____._

Subcontract ___ ______ _ _ _ _ _

• Maior Materials __ ______

CSD Service 3__

" Enq r Service _ _

PSE and OD PY . ____._ ______ ____._

ISC ani OD PY . . ______ ____._

Capital equip. _ _ _ _ _____ ______

B A and SCT 0 .1 1.O ____ ____._

HRC Page D1 of 8

'n ' - -w mmw ps wwpr;ypwwxm >mmmuem.~.mmmm. -r.mvav .y ,rvis- ~

.-~. 2.

ORNL TECHNIC AL / FIN A NCI AL INFORQ ATION SYSTEM (TY 1984)

. O

{. .

KEYWORDS 1 ACCELERATOR 45 COGE NE R ATION 2 ACID R AIN 46 COLLISIONS 3 ACTIN IDES 47 COMBUSTION 4 ACTIVE SOLAR 48 COMMUNITY ENERGY SYSTEMS 5 AEROSOLS 49 COMPATIBILITY 6 AFBC MATERIALS 50 C09POSITES 270 AGING 51 C09PUTER CODES 7 AIR CONDITIONING 57 COMPUTER GRAPHICS 8 AIR QUALITY 53 CONCENTRATION FACTORS 9 ALCOHOLS 54 COOLING TOWERS 10 ALLOYS 55 CORROSION 11 ALTERNATE CYCLES 56 CROP RESIDUES 12 ALTERN ATIVE ENERGY SOURCE 57 CROSS SECTIONS 11 AMORPHOUS ROCE 58 CRYOGENICS 14 ANNEALING 59 CRYSTALS 16 ARCHITECTUPE 60 DATA DASES 271 ASSESSMENT 61 DECOMMISSIONING 18 AUGER 62 DECONTAMINATION 19 BARYONS 63 DEFECTS 20 B ASE TECHNOLOGY 64 DEFENSE 21 BATTERIES 65 DEF0BMATION 22 BIOCH EMIS TRY 66 D EM A NLs (n~

23 24 BIO 9 ASS EN9RGY BIOPHOTOLYSIS 67 (TI5 D E PO SI TIO N DESIGD 15 BIOT ECHNO LOG Y 69 DEVELOPMENT 272 BLOOD _

70 DIELECTRICS C6 BUILDINGS) 71 DIESEL

, 27 C ARDIDES 72 DIFFRACTION

?8 CARBON DIOXIDE 73 DIFFUSION .

29 CARCINOGENESIS 74 DT SP ER SI O N 273 CARDIOV ASCUL AR DISEAS E 75 DISTRICT HEATING 10 CATALYSIS 76 DNA 11 CELLULOSE 77 DNA REPAIR 32 CERAMICS 78 DOSIMETRY 13 C H AN N ELIN G 79 ECOSYSTEMS 34 CHATTANOOGA SHALE 80 EIS 15 CHEMICAT. DEVELOPMENT R1 ELECTRICITY 16 CHEMISTRY 82 EL ECTR OC HEMIST R Y 17 CHRO1 ATOGR APHY 83 ELECTRONS 18 CHROMOSOME DAMAGE 84 ELMO BU5PY TORUS 19 COAL CONVERSION 85 E MIS SI ON S 40 COAL FLUIDIZED BED 86 ENGINEERING EXP ERIMENTS 41 COAL G ASIFIC ATION 87 ENTRAINMENT 42 COAL LIQUEFACTION 89 ENVIRON CONTROL TECH 41 COAL PREP AR ATION 89 ENVI RONME NT AL EFFECTS 44 CO AL W AST ES 90 ENSYMES k

NRC Page D3 of 8

- - . . . ..e,.._..-,._r.,u.,.,..,,,,

,,y.,_,, ,g , ,... , . ,_ . _ , , , , _ _ .

• ~

1 3gg ATIOy SYSTEM y

n"tinund 1 COOPERATION i -

~ -..." '

5-135 INTERN ATION A L ...

'7-M*~ .

136 TON

/

137 TON EXCHANGE 138 ION IMPL ANT ATION 139 IONIZATION m. M - 3 . . .. ,c ,-~-

'~"#

140 IONIZING RADIATION

- . j '

141 I9R ADI ATION l

142 ISOTOPES

- D N'wwd:IYWty's gjM%rn f 143 KINETICS 4 ' ' ^ :- ~~ m '~"

144 LAND USE _

14S L ANTHANIDES  ;

- . ~ ~" ~~" " -- ,

J.. q 146 LASERS c

..,,,',,_ [ ,'^- 9 _.

'?-

147 L ATTICE DYNAMICS E J d i.J.;' , , , ' ,

. - wl -

i -

' ' N. -

148 LEACHING W ASTE '-' ' .- '

149 LOW LEVEL 7

. . - ;,^

150 MASS SPECTROMETRY * , ' - .

151 M ATERI ALS ENGINEERING ' . -

~

152 153 M ATEBI ALS SCIENCEMECHANICAL PROPERTIE '

i

- .:[ g :, '

154 MEMBRANES - - . y. . ' '-~ - '

155 METALS

,- ['"'

156 METH AN E -

_, ' 7d'~~ ,

e1

. .c ,

157 METH ANOL METHODS DEVELOP,1ENT

^4 '

158 159 MICROORGANISMS

. .-'- ~i ' .

160 MICROSCOPY - - - '

'~.- - - - .

"', w-161 MIGR ATION 162 MODEL AN ALYSIS s- i, 163 MODELING "T-~~...__

164 MODULAR N TS STRUCTt1RES 16r 90L 166 MONITORING MOVING BOUNDARIES ';yq" .

' C_ TMiR4;qq %NM 168 169 MitTAGENESISNATION AL EN ERGY PLANNING '

17 0 MEtIT RINOS s " ' "'" '+ns. ,

',',.'"--- 3..? '

J ~

c . [~

yg7p0g3 DIDYIDES _.

~ -. . .

173 174 NITROGENNONDESTRUCTIVE '*ESTING ' '

175 NUMERICAL AN ALYSIS

~ ' ' ' R- . . .

176 OPER ATIONS JN 177 OTEC 178 OXIDATION e

. i 170 OYYGEN 180 OZONE 4

• .T.,

g .g 8'

%. *y - ,4 e em 4 . M ,@ .g m. 6 - N.

. . . . , , .~ . . .

. , G;. . - , --. .  : ;-'

. s . . -> ..

NRC Page D4 of 8 , . ; . 7 . v p W p -* -- . e. 3 FN . - *.--'

. ,,-+ mw2N.3:s::!=C.::::21-i.e.@;;;impey,@;.~2.Wy;agp%'p,ygyg.rtf e

,N w m e,, m , . ,

i -

)

O

)

ORNL TECliNIC AL / FIN ANCI AL INFORM ATION SYSTEM (FY 1984)

. .I KEYWORDS continued 274 EPIDEMIOLOGY 135 INTERN ATIONA L COOPER ATION 91 EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT 136 ION 92 FAULT TREES 137 ION EXCHANGE 93 FIBER OPTICS 138 ION IMPL ANT ATION 94 FILTR ATION 139 IONIZATION 95 FINITE ELEMENT METHODS 140 IONIZING RADIATION 96 FISH 141 IRR ADI ATION 97 FISSION PRODUCTS 142 ISOTOPES

, 98 FLOW 143 KINETICS I

99 FLUIDIZATION 144 LAND USE 100 FLUIDS 145 LANTHANIDES 101 FLUORESCENCE 146 LASERS 102 FORESTS 147 L ATTICE DYNA 9ICS 103 FR ACTUR E 148 LEACHING 104 FUEL CELLS 149 LOW LEVEL WASTE 105 GENERATORS 150 MASS SPECTROMETRY 106 GENETICS 151 M ATERI ALS ENGINEERING 107 GERM CELLS 152 M ATERT ALS SCIENCE 106 GRAP!!ITE 153 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES 109 GREENHOUSES 154 MEMBRANES 110 H COAL 155 M ET A LS 111 HADRONS 156 METH AN E

(.}-

112 HE ALTil EFFECTS 157 METHANOL 113 HEAT EXCH ANGERS 158 METHODS DEVELOP.1ENT 114 HEAT PUMP 159 MICROORGANISMS .

115 HE AT R EC3 VER Y 160 1ICROSCOPY 116 HEAT TRANSFER 161 MIGRATION 117 HEAVY IONS 162 MODEL ANALYSIS 118 HE LIU M 163 MODELING 119 H FIR 164 MODULA R STRUCTURES 120 HHIRF 165 MOLTEN SALTS 121 HIGH EN3RGY 166 MONITORING) 122 IIIGH VOLT AGE MOVING BOUNDARIES 123 HYDROCARBONS 168 MHTAGENESIS 124 HYDROELECTRIC 169 NATIONAL EN ERGY PL ANNING 125 HYDROGEN 170 NE t!T RI NOS 126 HYOROLOGY 171 NEUTRONICS 127 HYDPOTREATI9G 172 NEUTRONS 128 IGNE0!!S ROCK 173 NITROGEN DIOXIDES 129 T9MUNOLOGY 174 NONDESTPUCTIVE TESTING 110 IMPINGE 9ENT 175 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS 131 INDUSTRIAL CONSERVATION 176 OPERATIONS l 275 INDUSTRIAL RYGIENE 177 OTEC l 1

M EQV.RT_VE STPUCTURES 178 OIIDATICC W.3 INSTRUMS[TATIOD 170 OXYGEN 134 IN S!!L A T TO N 100 OZONE

(

NRC Page D4 of 8

] .

sl  !

ORNL TECHNICAL / FIN ANCI AL INFORGATION SYSTEM (FY 1984)

O

[ KEYWORDS continued 181 P ARTICULATES 225 SI LIC ATES 192 PASSIVE SOLAR 226 SKIN 193 PERMEATION 227 SOLID MECHANICS 1G4 P H ARM ACOLOGY 22R SOLID WASTES 195 P H AS ES 229 SOLIDI FIC ATION 186 PHOSPHATES 230 SOLU BILITY 187 PHOTOCHEMISTRY 231 SOLVENT EXTR ACTION 198 PHOT 0 ELECTRON 232 SORPTION 189 PHOTONS 233 SPECTP0 PHOTOMETRY 190 PllOTOVOLTI ACS 234 ' FOS OPY 19 1 PHYSICS S ST A NDA RDS 192 PL ASM A 236 ST5AM 193 PLUTONIUM 237 STEELS 194 POLICY AN ALYSIS 230 STORAGE 19 5 POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARDO WS 239 STRUCTURE 196 POLYMERS 240 SULFUE 197 POSITRON 241 SUPERCONDUCTORS 98 POWER PLANTh 242 SURFACE

(}69 rounau1LITY' 243 SIIRF AC TA NTS 200 PROCESS DEVELOPMENT 244 SYNCHROTRON 201 PROCESSES 245 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 202 PROTEINS 246 TEMPERATURE 203 PYROLYSIS 247 TERATOGENFSIS

{}- 204 RADIOACTIVE 248 T H ER MO DY N A M ICS 276 R A DIOP H AR M AC EHTIC ALS 249 THORIUM 205 RCRA 250 THREE MILE ISL AND 206 REACTOR Pn?L DEVELOPMENT 251 TOSCA 67 RE ACTOR S AFETY) 252 TOXICOLOGY IVB RECOVEYY 253 TRANSFORMATION 209 RFFPACTORY 254 TRANSPOPT 210 P_EGIONAL. ANALYSIS 255 TR A N SPORT ATIO*!

211 REGULATIONS 3 256 TRANSURANICS

. 2 R EP'RO C ESS ING 257 T R AN SUR A N IUM 277 REPRODUCTION 258 TRITIUM Ci213 RIST ASSESSMENTj[) 259 ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION 214 RNA 260 UP ANIlf M 215.. S A FEGU ARDS 261 WASTE ENERGY UTILIZATION

("216 SAPETY) 262 WASTE ISOLATION 217 S A LT REPOSITORY 261 WASTE MANAGE 93NT 218 SC ATT ER IN G 264 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 278 SC#EENING 265 WATER AVAILADILITY 220 SEDIMENTS 266 WATER CHEMISTRY 221 SEPAR ATION PROCESSES 267 W A TE R QU A LI TY 222 S ERVICES 263 WELDING 223 SHALE 269 X-EAY

• 224 SHIELDING NRC Page D5 of 8

7/E9/ 87 l

Fin i B0489 WORK STATEMENT ADDENDUM Appendix J Requirements / Site Source Terms Draft NUREG - 0773, " Reactor Accident Source Terms: Design and Siting Perspectives", dated March 1982, presents current information on reactor accidents that have been analyzed for various reactor designs, and develops a set of radioactive releases (source terms) in categories 1 though 5 which represent the spectrum of accidents.

Using ' release fractions to the containment which correspono to these source terms in categories 1 through 5:

A. Perform a sensitivity analysis ( include also test costs vs. confidence level) in which the containment design leak rate is assumed to be 0.1%,

0.5%,1.0%, 5.0%,10%, 25%, 50%, and 100% (wt.%/ day).

B. Determine the off-site risk, in terms of dose, to the public from each of these potential containment source terms, and C. Evaluate the desirability and practicality of establishing, explicitly in Appendix J, a single leakage limiting criterion for containment systems that would apply equally well to:

a) Large, dry PWR containments, b) Type I, II, and III BWR containments, c)Icecondensercontainments,and d) Negative pressure containments.

l This analysis will provide a basis for judging whether the present Appendix J containment integrated leak rate test criteria are realistic in terms of their effect on public risk and operational costs, and should include the following:

l

1) Whether there is a correlation between leakage test values / test intervals and estimated actual leakage during intervals beween tests (based on LERs, as-found tests, etc.).

2) Review the current 0.25L safety margin to see whether it provides reasonable assurance that actual leakage does not exceed design value.

Other References NUREG - 0771, Regulatory Impact of Nuclear Reactor Accident Source Term Assumptions, l

June 1981. Under extensive revision, estimated 9/82 publishing.

, NUREG - 0772, Technical Basis for Estimating Fission Product Behavior During LWR Accidents, June 1981.

NUREG/CR - 2239 (Draft), Technical Guidance for Siting Criteria Development (2.3).

Describes, in part, accident source terms, release characteristics, and uncertainties in source term magnitudes.

(!)I s

-. _ _ . . . _ . - . . _ .