ML20126F977
| ML20126F977 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/18/1982 |
| From: | Arlotto G NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES) |
| To: | Hart R ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126E434 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-B-0489, CON-FIN-B-489, FOIA-85-143 NUDOCS 8506180030 | |
| Download: ML20126F977 (6) | |
Text
. . '
D NOV 181982 Mr. R. J. Hart. Manager Oak Ridge Operations Office U. S. Department of Energy P. O. Box E Oak Ridge. Tennessee 37830
Dear Mr. Hart:
FY 1983 NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH ORDER NO. 60-83-065 FOR QAK RIDGE NATIONAL LA80RATORY l Please authorize Oak Ridge National Laboratory to execute the program described in the enclosed NRC Order.
i If this meets with your approval it is requested that acceptance be .
indicated on the enclosed form and the original be returned to the NRC i Office of Resource ManaJement and a copy to this office.
Sincerely.
Original signed by G. A. Arnouc Guy A. Arlotto, Director Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
Enclosures:
Distribution
- 1. NRC 0*
- 2. Program Briefs hD{ r Chron cc w/ enclosures: Riggs:rdg R. W. Barber. DOE /NSC A. Puglise, ORM G. Flanagan. ORNL J. Mate. ORM RES:D Wylbur FIN File FOIg.15- I 43
<G. Arndt. DET
' A. Eiss, DET i.' 8506180030 850325 58 PDR FOIA REYTDLA85-143 PDR RECORD NOTE: 1102 s. tnt 11/1/82 pj j ma> ..E..:MB ,,,,,
,RM( ,
l,. T RES:DET R
,,,,,, ,,, ,ggf,,,,, ,,p . ARGS.
- > dn.,,,,, ., .,C, , , , ., ., ..,,..,,..,,. ,s ban . . . . . 1.oAtp. . . . . ..... .u .ie i .( . . . . . fk?and/ . M.?an ...uu.<82.
e
-"* Jw.uet..... .....
1 ..
w.../.M.2..... . i.v. u.. . /.82... .. .. . ..).v$.82. .... .. .).v.g<82.. .. ..x.t. .f.82 wxc reau sie no soi wncu omeo q_.. . . . . . . .
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY I
@f
NOV 181982 DIV. L. ET CHANGE CONTROL FORM #
DATE: //[i/ss "
0 (06) CONTRACTOR d#Al C ORIGINATOR is*44.5 Ji (01) NEW FIN OLD FIN 3d/#9 (14) LEAD NAME Arad 8
, (03) TITLE Oonfehmanf IAdN h / & nglllM k $kg$ff
- f CHANGES AND COMMENTS:
B AR NO. _ FIN NO. FY FROM K$ ,TO K$ d KS AdhWill 80949 _th. J $O ffD 895.$1 J-- so s - .so
' 'Yt-l9 2 A & fin ikFA ll4-92.
'Date [B[anchC ef Date Proj ect Officd A APPROV .
A ott' rg( (
A. Eiss. Technical Assistant [
(02)B&R (08)CONTN0' (07) CONT ABBREV U EQ (22) TE M DAT (04) RRG-NO (29)OPER-BY 109)CONTMETH (15) BASE-CY (30) CM-BY (10) STATE (26)OPER-CY (47) ES M (11) ORG-CODE (27)COM-CY (32) E ST-PY (12) CONT-TYP (28)COMTH-CY (39) E VEST)
(13) CITY _ (23)OPER-PY
~
(20)PERF-DAT '(21) CONT-END (IO} ~ ^$
(46) CON-LEAD (43)SUBCON1 (57)TMITAP# (17)CYSUPPL (19)CYTMISUPPL BY = NEXT YEAR CY = CURRENT YEAR PY = PREVIOUS YEAR ,
OTHER COMMENTS:
SUSPENSE COPY TO MARIANNE RIGGS m/s 1130-S5 COPY TO
o ul*** t . .a' C'
- C * *w 55 'es cou o Avvei s 1 NRC somw 173
'"' 60-83-065 STANDARD ORDER FOR DOE WORK NOV 181982 l l
WWED ev. pont O'f.c0 ACCOUNTtNG clTATs0N MUED TO 4 DOE O'lical asemosa nataos svwoog 31X0200.603 Oak Ridge Operations Office Division of Engir.eering es = = vw u m Technninov 60190101 esRFORuiNo oRcANizATiON AND LOCATION e i= =vw u n Oak Ridge National Laboratory B0489-3 WORK PERiDD TMit ORDER FINED D ESTsu ATED @
FIN TIT LE Containment Leak Test Sensitivity Study 'a$/1/82 *~2/1/83 08 LIGATION AVAILABILITY PROVIDED SY:
s 10,000 A TwisORDER
" " ^*
lR s 2,390.000
- IPNDYRTu?"E'"d'ANE'od"A?lDe'.
w ssR =Uweia CITED AsovE sU'e'OS*' ANNE'*' ETE"$cifs"Os'E'E trOTAt A a si s 2,400,000
- c. TOTAL ORDERS TO oATE D. AMOUNT INCLUDED IN *C" APPLIC ASLE TO THE " FIN NUMBER" CITED IN THIS ORDER.
8 10,000 FINANCI AL PLEKiBILITY:
D FUNDS wiLL NOT SE REPROGRAMMED BETWEEN FINS UNE D CONSTITUTis A LIMITATION O AUTHORIZ E D .
Q FUNDS MAY BE REPROGR AMMED NOT TO EXCE ED 110% OF FIN LEVEL UP TO SBOK. LI ON OeLiGATIONS AUTMDRIZED.
STANDARD TERh5 AND CONDITIONS PROVIDED DOE ARE CONSIDERED PART OF TMi$ ORDER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
ATTACMMENTS:
SE CURITY:
THE POLLOWING ATTACHMENTE ARE MEREBY MADE A PART OF THIS ORDER; D WORK ON TMil ORDER IS NOT CLASSIFIED.
DSTATEMENT OF WOR K D work ON TMll ORDER INVOLVES CLAS$1FIED INFORMATION. NRC FORM 187 IS ATTACHED.
D ADDITIONALT1RMS AND CONDIT60NS
- D OTHER
- REMARKS:
A final work package (189) reflecting approved FY 1983 resources and scope should be furnished within 90 days. Six copies should be sent to the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research and one copy to the NRC Office of Resource Management.
FY 83 THIS BUDGET OBLIG FIN NO. TITLE
$ 50K $ 10K B0489-3 Dontainmen.t Leak Test Sensitivity Study l
]
// ISS D p IIN) AUTHORl1Yf a A ACCEPflNG ORG ANIZATION sio=AT uas i sioNaTuft/ UL @irector]P { ""::;,,
- GM_ A. Arlot '"
visio of Engineering Technology -
Ifficeo Nuclear Reculatorv Research **"
NRC F'ORM 17 a.ish em.
. ;- i
, FY 1983 PROGRAM BRIEF DIVISION: DET TITLE: CONTAINMENT LEAK TEST SENSITIVITY STUDY FIN NO.: B0489 CONTRACTOR: ORNL SITE: OAK RIDGE STATE: TN NRC TECHNICAL MONITOR: E. G. ARNDT A
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: G. FLAlpfGAN ,,
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 60190101- FY 83 BUDGET: $50K FY 1983 WORK PERIOD: 11/1/82 - 2/1/83 A'. '
=
OBJECTIVE:
DETERMINE WHETHER CURRENTLY SPECIFIED CONTAINMENT ALLOWABLE LEAK RATES SHOULD BE REVISED, AND, IF S0, HOW MUCH AND ON WHAT BASIS. .
EVALUATE THE DESIRABILITY AND PRACTICALITY OF ESTABLISHING, EXPLICITLY IN APPENDIX J. A SINGLE LEAKAGE LIMITING CRITERION FOR ALL CONTAINMENT TYPES.
SCOPE:
DRAFT NUREG-0773, " REACTOR ACCIDENT SOURCE TERMS: DESIGN AND SITING PERSPECTIVES."
DATED MARCH 1982 PRESENTS CURRENT INFORMATION ON REACTOR ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE BEEN ANALYZED FOR VARIOUS REACTOR DESIGNS, AND DEVELOPS A SET OF RADI0 ACTIVE RELEASES (SOURCE TERMS) IN CATEGORIES 1 THROUGH 5 WHICH REPRESENT THE SPECTRUM OF ACCIDENTS.
USING RELEASE FRACTIONS TO THE C9NTAINMENT WHICH CORRESPONDS TO THESE SOURCE TERMS IN CATEGORIES 1 THROUGH 5:
A. PERFORMASENSITIVITYANALYSIS(INCLUDEALSOTESTCOSTSVSCONFIDENCELEVEL)
IN WHICH THE CONTAINMENT DESIGN LEAK RATE IS ASSUMED TO BE 0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0%,
5.0%,10%, 25%, 50%, and 100% (WT.5/ DAY).
B. DETERMINE THE OFFSITE RISK IN TERMS OF DOSE TO THE PUBLIC FROM EACH OF 1 THESE POTENTIAL CONTAINMENT SOURCE TERMS, C. COMPARE RISK REDUCTION OF A SIMPLE GROSS CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY CHECK WITH THESE APPENDIX J LEAK RATE TESTS, AND D. EVALUATE THE DESIRABILITY AND PRACTICALITY OF ESTABLISHING, EXPLICITLY IN APPENDIX J. A SINGLE LEAKAGE LIMITING CRITERION FOR CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS THAT WOULD APPLY EQUALLY WELL T0:
a) LARGE, DRY PWR CONTAINMENTS, b TYPE I, II, AND III BWR CONTAINMENTS, c ICE CONDENSER CONTAINMENTS, AND d NEGATIVE PRESSURE CONTAINMENTS.
THIS ANALYSIS WILL PROVIDE A BASIS FOR JUDGING WHETHER THE PRESENT APPENDIX J CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST CRITERIA ARE REALISTIC IN TERMS OF THEIR EFFECT ON PUBLIC RISK AND OPERATIONAL COSTS, AND SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
O
- 1) WHETHER THERE IS A CORRELATION BETWEEN LEAKAGE INTERVALS AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL LEAKAGE DURING I TESTS (BASED ON LERS. AS-FOUND TESTS, ETC.).
I REVIEW THE CURRENT 0.25La SAFETY MARGIN TO SEE WHETHER IT PROVIDES 2)
REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT ACTUAL LEAKAGE DOES NO VALUE.
OTHER REFERENCES NUREG - 0771, (FOR COMMENT) REGULATORY IMPACT OF NUCL ASSUMPTIONS, JUNE 1981.
NUREG - 0772, TECHNICAL BASIS FOR ESTIMATING ' A.
FISSION PRODUCT LWR ACCIDENTS, JUNE 1981.
NUREG/CR - 2239 DESCRIBES (DRAFT).
IN PART, ACCIDENTTECHNICAL SOURCE TERMS, GUIDANCE RELEASE CHA AND UNCERTAINTIES IN SOURCE TERM MAGNITUDES.
I For work conducted for the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES), contacts with NRC licensees require the advanced written approval of the RES project officer.
e
. , l F m Pt_ Imc4j n j z j,,.
O ODNL ,
TITLE: C o n rA igsga r L. go. 7tS y 3g3,. .,,,, c, FY 83 FY 84 OPER 'OPER FIN (S) RES LEAD PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR MANAGER
~ bo+t9 d5. Arash To r b ross
- o. o 5 Geo,3c Fic ,y A d iendun,
]
I. 0B3ECTIVES n) p e h< , ,r,;n e clu; , p lo ri.S le cwhlId% by Wa cm Icek ,,u,A lui rde c 4 up , L . e., ], o w i4er W sylVe-on b, ew k: a ur. b t ab-.*y ? a Th 2
}< d n d e p ia.ho>rof dJa f, gL &) fu acy v4 7,4 h a my,a. e L 0t;/,6 S em)ln .,ya,., J., %, k h. .
II. HOW ARE OBJECTIVES RELATED TO SAFETY? '/L o6jee.d b r e. [a l e b [ %
e d ey a c., viz. c r<5.Jed,% e, lealap , el} % aclegua, m,, la.i ., uud, ej m /< 44;/A inky.y III. WHAT WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED 50 FAR? M (Drt M L / /J e c. e= d!"<'I' o " ene'*d j lw bee., b e lcl, c (ce rl lq o fj e c b'm c+,, d /,'m old1% f M' S , e..e so u > < es 4<.%2NL.
, % +.lg i,$ ;v4..., & n a.,J c/aJc.
IV. WHAT ARE THE EXPECTED ACHIEVEMENTS OF THIS WO
, afps;h rist a +~~ g das< k p t, lie (e,- un<u I<a ra&es.
C In ct<a wih g g,t,. << Ja u% cco -;w is en 4 f-ce.,+a
)'m, ..,,,ua.& iJe5r:. pe,T lere,;nh% 4
.T lec.L rde + esfs i .
/qp/ <. les Lsy. linsiko.
31.,3 cri ler;% fer e.Lf epsh . .,u d f.,I,,a, V. HOWWILLTHERESULTSBEAhPLICABLETOLICENSINGPROCESS?
, , L u. r eA n bs tocraso L ru.J 4s A ,. ..
fr-t> si /ptu g
/qp . n d; < T , us %. pa('ou & 2.C, cederrs,,.3 S'G . ? - I 9 ? 1.
%lA 85-143 go
-.