ML20127K799
| ML20127K799 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1984 |
| From: | Mcdonald R ALABAMA POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8505220192 | |
| Download: ML20127K799 (45) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:, _,P( .- , ALABAMA POWER COMPANY ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT PART B: RADIOLOGICAL'
-JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT NO. 1 LICENSE NO. NPF-2 AND UNIT NO. 2 LICENSE NO. NPF-8 PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1984 r
8505220192 841231 I ( PDR ADOCK 05000348 I' R PDR
7- -
-{ -
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title P,aje I- Introduction ~ 1 II Radiological Sampling and Analysis 1 III' Results and Discussion 5
'IV Land Use Census and Interlaboratory Comparison 8
. Program 8
- V - Data Trends and Conclusions e
i
1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT - LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page 3.12-1 _ Indicator Sampling Locations for Airborne 9
. Environmental Radioactivity in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area s
3.12-2 . Community (Indicator'II) Sampling Locations for- 10 Airborne Radioactivity in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area 3.12-3 Control-Sampling Locations-for Airborne _ 11 Environmental Radioactivity in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area 3.12-4 Indicator-and Control Sampling Locations for 12 Waterborne Environmental Radioactivity in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area b ii
^"
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT LIST OF TABLES -
. Table Title Page 1 Scope of Operational Radiological Environmental 13 Monitoring Program at the Farley Nuclear Plant During 1984 2 Outline of. 0perational Radiological Environmental 14 Monitoring Program for Farley Nuclear Plant During 1984 3 Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample 19 Analysis _ for Farley Nuclear Plant 4 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations 21 in Environmental Samples 5 Sampling and Analysis Deviations During 1984 22 6 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Locations 26 F08-1 Airborne: Particulates and Iodine - Operational 30 Radioactivity Summary F08-2 External Radiation - Operational Radioactivity 31 Summa ry F08 Milk - Operational Radioactivity Summary 32 F08-4 Vegetation: Forage, Vegetables and Fruits - 33 Operational Radioactivity Summary F08-5 Soil - Operational Radioactivity Summary 34 F08-6 Waterborne: Surface and Ground Water - Operational 35 Radioactivity Summary F08-7 Sediment: _ River - Operational Radioactivity 36 Summa ry F08-8 Fish: River - Operational Radioactivity Summary 37 iii
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment Title pg 1 Land Use Survey for Radiological Environmental 38~ Monitoring Program, Farley Nuclear Plant, July 1984 i i -- l iv
OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 I.- Introduction . The Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, owned and operated by Alabama Power Company (APCo), located in Houston County, Alabama is approximately fifteen miles east of Dothan, Alabama on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River. Unit 1, a Westinghouse Electric Corporation Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) with a rated power output of 860 megawatts electrical (MWe) achieved initial criticality on August-9, 1977. The unit was declared " commercial" on December 1, 1977. Unit No. 2, also a 860 MWe Westinghouse PWR, achieved initial criticality on May 8, 1981 and was declared " commercial" on July 30, 1981. During 1984, Unit No. I was shut down for a scheduled refueling outage from February 10 to April 22. Unit No. 2 was not shut.down for a scheduled refueling outage during 1984. Unit 2 was shut down from August 31 to September 15 for steam generator tube plugging. The sample collection and analysis schedule for the operational off-site radiological environmental monitoring program implemented in May 1977 and as modified on July 1, 1980 with the addition of 141TLD stations was continued during 1984 for both Units No. I and
- 2. The program was further modified effective April 1982 to reflect Amendment No. 26 to the Unit 1 Technical Specifications issued March'1, 1982. This program was designed to monitor any radioactivity contribution to the environs from the plant through either the airborne or waterborne pathways. The type of samples monitored, and number and type of sampling stations are shown in Table 1. Indicator sampling stations are located, where practical, at locations where detection of the radiological effects of the plant's operation is thought to be most likely, where the samples collected should provide a significant indication of potential dose to man, and where an adequate comparison of predicted radiological levels might be made with measured levels. The control stations are placed at locations where radiological levels are not expected to be significantly influenced by plant operation, i.e., at background locations. For some airborne radioactivity samples, community 3
stations are located at the principal population centers between the indicator and the control stations (3-8 miles). These in i normal operation could be used, if desired, as additional control stations, and alternatively, as indicator stations in the nearest population centers in the event of a major airborne release of radioactivity from the plant. II. Radiological Sampling and Analysis A detailed outline of the operational radiological sampling and analysis activities for the off-site environmental program to meet the requirements of the Unit I and 2 Technical Specifications is given in Table 2. For each parameter only one sample was collected 1
y c. -t j n e. h. _hr E and:one analysis performed to meet the specifications for both
' Units No. 1 and 2.
t
. The samples were collected by APCo's. technical staff except for 3 the in situ HP(Ge) gamma-ray spectroscopy ~ measurements of soil.
The liitter were made by staff members of the University _of ~ -i
-Georgia (UGA), Center for Applied Isotope Studies. All sample- l analyses ~were contracted to UGA. The minimum detectable concentration '
(MDC), specified for the various samples and their respective analyses are given in Table 3. A number of sampling problems and/or deviations from the sampling j schedule were encountered during 1984. These-are listed in' Table
- 5. The deviations were chiefly mechanical problems such as failure 1 of the air or water samplers. During the winter months, grazing ,
by deer.and rabbits resulted in inadequate forage at' established ! forage-sampling plots, thus samples were taken at alternate locations :i on several occasions. Several TLD's were lost but only at station 1215 was the number lost excessive compared to prior years. Vandalism was so severe at station 1215 that allsdata was lost except for second quarter 1984.. Tentative plans have been made to ; protect'it from future vandalism. New air monitoring stations were ; installed during August of 1984 to replace the existing stations.. This installation resulted in some 6-Day.and-8-Day air sampling periods. Lightning struck the underground cable supplying power _ , to' station.0701. As a result, the cable was-so badly damaged that repair was_ impossible._ Design changes have been submitted.to provide power to the station. Station 0501 was turned on to compensate for 0701. Also iodine collection was started at station 0703, Great Southern Paper Co., in Cedar Springs, GA, at.the i request.of Georgia Department of Natural Resources for the NRC Comparative Program. ; A. Airborne Particulates and Iodine All airborne particulate.and iodine monitoring stations shown
'in Figure 3, 12-1 and 3.12-3 and the community stations ,
listed in Table 2 were equipped with Bell and Gossett vacuum pumps which operated continuously at a flow rate of approximately , 0.04/m8 / min (1.5 ft 3/ min) from January to August. During the month of August new Roots vaccum pump systems were installed. i The new systems also operate continuously at a flow rate-of' ( s approximately 0.04/m8 / min (1.5ft 8/ min). The particulates l were collected on Gelman Metricel 47mm (or equivalent) filters. ~l
.In series with, but downstream of the particulate filters F&J 50 mm (or equivalent) activated charcoal cartridges were used !
c for collection of iodine. In the Bell and Gossett system the particulate filter paper and charcoal cartridge were mounted horizontally to the ground with a Rockwell Gas Meter measuring i the cumulative air flow. The Roots system has the samplc ' collector mounted on the outside of the cabinet horizontally to the ground with a Singer gas meter measuring the cumulative . air-flow. Both types of gas meters were calibrated against a i 2 _,..-Z
. certified. flow meter. Both the-particulate. filters and charcoal l cartridges were collected weekly and'sent to UGA for radioactivity -
analysis. i-
' Gross beta radioactivity measurements were performed on each ,
air particulate -filter using a Tennelec ' low background alpha-beta counting _ system. The filters from each station, composited and at the end of each guarter, were analyzed for gamma emitters using a fifteen percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based multichannel analyzer (MCA).
.All air monitoring station locations shown in Figures 3.12-1 i and 3.12-3 have the capability of monitoring airborne iodine.
-Weekly routine samples were analyzed for I-131-by UGA using.a Canberra 1024~ channel MCA'and counter, specially designed and built by UGA for counting I-131 activity in charcoal cartridges, using two 1" x 3" NaI detectors and matched photomultiplier :
tubes. i B. External Radiation For the continuous measurement of environmental gamma radiation, natural LiF (TLD-700) chips were supplied by Harshaw-Filtrol-Chemical Company. TLD packets each containing four annealed
-LiF chips were supplied on both a quarterly and an annual ;
basis. The chips were first sealed in opaque sylar.to give a l packet that was light-tight, weather proof, and which had a ' low mass attenuation for radiation (approximately 50mg/cm2 ), . On the plant site, all TLD packets were kept in a' lead safe with 2-inch walls except for those receiving field exposure or those in the p'rocess of being exchanged. At each external radiation monitoring station, shown in Figures 3.12-1, 3.12-2, and 3.12-3, two TLD packets,-one changed and read quarterly and one changed and read annually, ; were exposed side-by-side on metal stakes at n' height of one ' meter above the ground. For the computation of the net field doses, a log of all exposure periods was maintained for each TLD packet.- C. Milk An indicator milk supply was located in Cedar Springs, GA ' (four miles from the plant in sector 6). The supply consisted of 1 milk cow owned by Mr. Walter Mills. This location was ; added to the milk sampling scheduled from January I until ;
-March 12 when FNP was notified that milking had been terminated, -
and if milking was to resume FNP would be contacted. The i background sample location remained as indicated on Figure 3.12-3. All milk samples, collected bi-weekly, were analyzed by UGA for I-131 and gamma emitters. As a preservative for shipment, 1 al of 25 percent (by weight) merthiolate (Thimerasol) solution was added to each 1.0 gallon sample. v 3
E, .'
.The'I-131' concentration in each_ sample was determined by collection on anion exchange resin, elution with sodium e
hypochlorite, followed by organic estractioniand counting, by
. beta samma coincidence,_the resultant toluene-iodine solution-in a low levelyliquid scintillation. counter specially designed by UGA. ' Stable iodine carrier was added to each sample for
. determination of the radiochemical yield.
A 1 liter quantity of each sample was placed in a marinelli' beaker;and then analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA.
. D. Vegetation:: . Forage Once e'ach month, forage was collected from indicator grass plots. located near the air monitoring stations at the plant site perimeter.in sectors 7 (SSE) and 16'(N), and from_a control grass. plot located near the air monitoring station in Dothan.. After, drying and pulverizing,,the samples were analyzed by UGA for gamma emitters using a 15'per cent relative
' efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer based MCA.
E. Soil Annual in situ gamma-ray spectroscopy measurements were made by UGA iiiing a 10 per cent relative efficiency high purity
. germanium detector and gasma-ray spectroscopy system specially L designed for field use. Measurements.were taken at the 7
~
indicator locations and at the 5 community and control (background). locations listed in Table 2. A 1024 channel Canberra MCA was interfaced to a Hewlett-Packard 9825A calculator.for data storage and' analysis. F. Surface Water: River Water Samples of water from the Chattahoochee River, above and below the plant site at the locations shown in Figure 3.12-4 were collected on a semi-continuous basis with. Instrumentation Specialties Company (ISCO) samplers. Monthly composites were L sent to UGA for radioactivity analysis. Two liter aliquots from each monthly composite were placed in trays lined with plastic film and evaporated to dryness at 100 0C. The residue and plastic film was folded to fit a petri-dish and analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 per cent relative efficiency L Ge(Li) low background detector and a Canberra 4096 channel L computer-based MCA. At the end of.each quarter, for each sampling location, the l balance of the three monthly composites were combined to give j a quarterly composite sample. Approximately 50 m1 from each
- quarterly composite sample was distilled and a 25 al aliquot taken for tritium _analyis using a large volume (100 ml) low 4
,k 4
1 background liquid scintillation _ counter specially designed and built byLUniversity of Georgia.
- G. Groundwater: Well Water In'the Farley Plant area, there are no indicator sources of groundwater in the true sense of the definition. A well.
which . serves Great Southern Paper Company as a source of potable. water, located on the east bank of the Chattahoochee River about four miles' south-southeast of the plant, was-
' sampled.on a quarterly basis and designated as an indicator
^ station. A deep well which supplies water to the Whatley Residence located about 1.2 miles southwest of the center of' the plant was sampled on a quarterly basis and designated as a control (background) station. Samples from both were sent to UGA for radioactivity analysis. An aliquot from each sample was taken for tritium analysis. After distillation, 25 al samples were analyzed using a large volume (100 ml) low background liquid scintillation counter. From the remainder of each sample, a0 two liter aliquot was taken and evaporated to dryness at 100 C in a tray lined with plastic film. .The residue and film was folded to fit a petri dish and analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA. H. Fish: River On a semi-annual basis two types of fish, game and bottom feeding, were collected from the Chattahoochee River at the locations shown in Figure 3.12-4, and were sent to UGA for samma-ray spectroscopy analysis. The edible tissue was removed and coarsely chopped then analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15.per cent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li)
-detector and 4096 channel Canberra computer-based MCA.
I. Sediment: River On a semi-annual basis sediment samples were collected from the Chattahoochee River below the plant site at the location shown in Figure 3.12-4. Approximately I kg was sent to UGA for gamma-ray spectroscopy analysis. The' samples were dried, mixed, and analyzed using a 15 per cent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel
, computer-based MCA.
III. Results and Discussion During the operational period, no known atmospheric nuclear tests were conducted. Identifiable radioactivity effects from the last test conducted by the Peoples Republic of China on October 16,
, 1980 were essentially non-existent during 1984.
5
.I(
c j m T . For measurements involving radioactivity concentrations by volume or 'asss the designated minimum detectable concentration.is defined-
'in Table 3.
2Formeasurementsinvolvingaquantityofradioactivdyorradiation that is independent;of ~.the sample volume or mass the designation
" lower limit of detection" (LLD) is used to denote the limit of
, detection applicable at the 95 per cent confidence level. The LLD is defined as "the smallest amounts' of sample activity that will
.. yield a net count fot which there is confidence at a predetermined
, level that activity is present". Its applications are limited to measurement systems which denote a' limiting detection capability without respect to the size of, sample.and/or radiochemical yield and to measurments which by their nature do not involve concentrations, such as radiation dose rates (arad/hr., arad/qtr., etc.)
A. Airborne Particulates and Iodine , The results of the radioactivity analyses of airborne particulate t filters and iodine charcoal cartridges are shown in Table i F08-1. The mean gross beta activity value for the indicator i ' sampling locations was. lower than the_ community and control sampling locations. The average mean gross beta values for all sampling locations-were slightly lower than the respective 1983 values and lower by a factor of eight-to the pre-operational
; values.
The gamma-ray spectroscopy-data for the air particulate t. i filter composites showed traces of Cs-134 and Cs-137 in a few samples. All iodine-131. values were below the measured MDC-o as was found in 1983'and during the preoperational period.
-B. External Radiation L The results of the external radiation measurements using TLD packets, each containing four LiF chips, are shown in Table F08-2. As found during the preoperational measurement period and.during 1983, the data reflects the' differences in site L specific soil radioactivity, with the average: indicator
! values higher than for the community and control values. All the averages were lower than found in 1983, and higher than
- the averages found during the preoperational period. The U
suas for.the four quarterly measurements were higher than the averages for the annual TLD's as was found in 1983. During
- the preoperational period it was found that the average values for the annual TLD's was slightly higher than the .
respective suas of the four quarterly measurements which is the reverse of that found in 1984 and 1983. C. Milk The results from the analyses of milk for radioactivity are shown'in Table F08-3. Milk from the Brooks-Silcox Dairy was sampled as the control. An indicator milk location was 6
b sampled for the months of January and February. Only naturally occurring radioactive isotopes were detected in the samples. D. Vegetation The vegetation sampled during this operational period included forage only. The radioactivity analysis results for this operational period are shown in Table F08-4. Forage, as during the preoperational period, continued to be a very effective and sensitive indicator of airborne radioactivity. The specific activity values for the various gamma emitting radionuclides were not signifcantly different for the indicator locations and the control location. Traces of Cs-134 and Cs-137 were found'in some samples. However the data for 1984 indicated fewer fission product radionuclides than the data for the preoperational period. E. Soil The results of the one in situ'HP(Ge) gamma-ray spectroscopy analysis of soil during This operational period are shown in Table F08-5. The only man-made radioactivity found at low levels in all measurments was Cesium-137. During the preoperational period, the fission products Zr-95, Nb-95 and Cs-134 were seen at most of the locations in addition to Cs-137. The levels of Cs-137 were lower than the 1983 and preoperational periods. F. Waterborne: Surface and Ground Water The results of radioactivity analysis of surface and ground water are shown in Table F08-6. Traces of Cs-134 and Cs-137 were found in a few river water control and indicator samples. The values were close to those found in 1983 and lower than those observed during the pre-operational period. The average indicator tritium level was higher than the control sample but was lower than'that found in 1983 and the pre-operational period. Two ground water indicator samples contained detectable Cs-137 at very low levels. All indicator and control sample tritium levels were less than the MDC values. G. Sediment: River The results of radioactivity analysis of sediment samples from the Chattahoochee River are shown in Table F08-7. Manmade radioactivity was not found at detectable levels during 1984 which is in agreement with that found during 1981 and during the preoperational period. 7 r
rs - H. Fish: River The results of gamma-ray spectroscopy analysis of the edible portions of two types of fish taken from the Chattahoochee River are shown in Table F08-8. Cs-137 was found at low levels in both the indicator and control samples. The average Cs-137 values were slightly lower than that found in 1983 and during the preoperational period. IV. Land Use Cenus and Interlaboratory Comparison Program
-A. Land Use Census The results of the July 1984 Land Use Census are given in Attachment I to this report.
B. Interlaboratory Comparison Program During 1984, the University of Georgia Center for Applied Isotope Studies (UGA) was a participant in the EPA Crosscheck Program. The UGA EPA Program code designation is EA. Although Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP) also participates in the EPA Crosscheck Program under code designation FU, none of the environmental analyses reported herein were performed by FNP. V. Data Trends and Conclusion Review of the 1984 analytical results showed radioactivity levels lower than those found in 1983 and during the preoperational period. In conclusion no significant trends indicating changes in the radioactivity levels in the environs of the Farley Nuclear
~ Plant as a result of its operation were found.
8
L Ii t .*". 3 --
, . le i 7t.75 WLKE l N J i T-NORMAL lis NNW NNEj) i -
X/Q =SEC/ 1.OM16'3 i4 *
- 2 NW , ,, NE i
t
.- 4 T: :
,, ~
.s s "l
- i 13 3 WNWi W ENE .
- z. w xs]&M.~ m .
i 1
)
[
"-' % &N G ;s. e '
N ir.'s[ . . g i .br-l
, * * * . : ~j f p .., ,-
t.' n 'R'
. , \
' s, sw */ . -
.- e sE u
,, 7' , . , , ., , , s
'-)4-- " #'"
[ , 7 A g ssw a ssE , I
\
-l 1,.s)
')
w ,
, j
___ - m A_ _ _ Yb _ /
$ FOR AGE S AMPLIN G A TLD SAMPLING
@ TLD, PARTICULATES S ICOINE SAMPLING EAn.& a 7&&T FIGURE 3.12-1 INDICATOR S AMPLING LOC ATIONS FCR tlR80RNE ENVIRONMENTAL R ADIO ACTIVIT Y AT THE FARLEY NUCL E A R PL ANT.
9
OLAstLY
\gg N /
le ai . NNw l NNC 14 1
'g 02 Nw NE j
cet wesa i ff webrom 13 \ M WNw ENE na l I = m:=P' Y [4 , f 4 N ' C1044 speenSS gg ASMFORO , h OS wsw ESE e f , q g 00800m 10 06 Sw , SE JAA82
't 09 07 Ik uw ur j 8
SCALE na WW FIGURE 3.12-2 CCuuunirY uNDICATOR El SAuNING LOCATICNS FOR AIRECRNC A AOlO ACilVITY IN THE FAALEY NUCLEAR PLANT ARCA. l 10
. A I
/ 1 *g
! ;,j!r e .
.1 s ;
- *.... g ,
-s .
y, _n ,g ,1 N , / w 4
.........e...*
, /
8.. 5g o5 ~, e.g, . . ..- ' ,, ! s
%g ...
.aw ; g *.
' M:$,
Eg. e J' 0
;yi
*g 1
l 'e
). . *
/
. N [$$.
- eg
.g gg i
. *gE.
e p f . h u.
~
?
. ,t .. ..
- t lli s y
.. * * . . . . ........ ...........- y
~f
~ t* ; d' en
~
c
\ i l&
/ -
N!}
'd*=us ~
. . .v -
i
~ii? ~
, ,g ,. ~.'l \ \ n.w
; O
- .. ? ( 6 f i . .... ..
'y sig !!i 11
COLUM BIA e s2 , 1
-S2 ANDREWS LOCK & OAM
;FARLEY 10 MILES / Y#
~~~
EARLY COUNTY l D f (6 h GEORGIA ASHFORD l I ._u 4 s. D GORDON' ~%. ta l HOUSTON COUNTY 1 ALABAMA T ,* INDICATOR STATIONS CONTROL STATIONS E SURFACE AND GROUND WATETt -@ SURFACE WATER AND FISH E FISH AND SEDIMENT @ GROUND WATER FIGURE 3.12-4 INDICATOR AND CONTROL SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR WATERBORNE ENVIRONMENTAL RA0lOACTIVITY IN THE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AREA. O
TABLE 1 SCOPE OF OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMEf4TAL MONITORING PROGRAM AT THE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT DURING 1984 Principal Type of Number of Sampling Stations Pathway Samples Indicator Community Control Airborne Particulates 3 3 2 Airborne Iodine 3 1 2 External Radiation 16 17 4 Airborne Milk la , 3 D Forage 2 - 1 Vegetables and Fruits' 1 - 1 Soil d 7 3 2 River Water 1 - 1 Groundwater 1 - 1 Waterborne River Fish 1 - 1 River Sediment 1 - -
*Available for January and February of 1984 only.
Forage sampling in lieu of vegetable and fruit. C Vegetable and fruit sampling discontinued with implementation of Unit 1 Technical Specification Upgrade (Amendment No. 26, issued March 1,1982). Annual I_n Situ Gamma Measurements continued by choice of licensee during 1984. 13
TABLE 2 OLTTLINE OF OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM FOR FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT DURING 1984 Types of Samples and Sampling Type and Frequency Sampling Locations and of (Distances Given in Miles) Collection. Frequency Analysis AIRBORNE Continuous operation of sampler with Particulate sampler. sample collection as required by dust Particulates loading but at least once per 7 days. Analyze.for gross beta radioactivity > 24 hours Indicator Stations: following filter change. Peform gamma isotopic North Perimeter (N-0.8) analysis .cni cach sample South Perimeter (SSE-1.0) when gross beta activity Plant Entrance - Nearest Residence (WSE-0.9) is >10 times the yearly River Intake Structure (ESE-0.8) mean of. control samples. . Perform gamma isotopic analysis on composite Community Stations: (by location) sample at 5 least once per 92 days. Columbia, AL. (N-5) ~ Great Southern Paper Co., (SSE-3) Ashford, AL. (WSW-8) Control Stations: Blakely, Ga. (NE-15) Dothan, AL (W-18) Iodine Continuous Sampler operation Radioiodine canister. with charcoal canister Analyze at least once Indicator Stations: collection weekly. per 7 days for I-131. North Perimeter (N-0.8) South Perimeter (SSE-1.0) Plant Entrance - Nearest Residence (WSW -0.9) River Intake Structure (ESE-0.8) Page 1 of 5
1 TABLE 2'~(com'd) Types ef Samples .~~ and Sampling Type and Frequency' - 3 Sampling Locations . and of
~'
(Distances Given in Miles) Collection Frequency' . Analysis Community Stations: Great Southern Paper Co., (SSE-3)- Control Stations. <
'Blakely,'GA (NE-15)
Dothan, AL. (W-18) Soil Annual in situ Ge(Li) gamma-ray Gamma Isotopic -: annually., . spectroscopy measurements. Indicator Stations: Seven Stations along the plant perimeter (N-0.8, NE-1.0, E-0.8, SSE-1.0, SSW-1.0, WSW-0.9, and NNW-0.8) Community Stations: Columbia, AL (N-5) Great Southern Paper Co., Ga. (SSE-3) Ashford, AL (WSW-8) Control Stations: Blakely, Ga. (NE-15) Dothan, A1. (W-18) DIRECT RADIATION At least once per 92 days Gamma dose. Readout at least once per 92 days Page 2 of 5
TABLE 2 (con'd). . Types of' Samples' .. and Sampling- Type and Frequency Sampling Locations and of. J^ (Distances Given in Miles) Collection Frequency. Analysis Indicator I Stations: Sixteen stations, one in each meteorological , -- , sector, along the plant permiter. (N-0.8, ., NNE-0.9, NE-1.0, ENE-0.9, E-0.8, ESE-0.8, SE-1.1, SSE-1.0, S-1.0, SSW-1.0, SW-0.9, WSW-0.9, W-0.8, WNW-0.8, NW-1.1, and NNW-0.9). .
~ '
Indicator II (Community) Stations: Sixteen stations, one in each meteorological , :f 1- sector at a distance- of 4-5 miles. (NNE-4, ' i NE-4, ENE-4, E-5, ESE-5, SE-5, SSE-3,.S-5, '!-
- - SSW-4, SW-5, WSW-4, W-4, WNW-4, NW-4, NNW-4, /
and N-5) Additional station at Ashford, AL. (WSW-8). I J Control Stations: i
- Blakely, Ga. (NE-15) -
Neals Landing, F1. (SSE-18) ,' Dothan,-AL. (W-18) ~ Dothan, AL. (W-15) ' i
- i WATERBORNE :
4 Surface Water
. Indicator Station: Composite taken with propor- Gamma isotopic' analysis i
tional semi-continuous sampler, of each composite sample. Great Southern Paper Co. , having a minimum sampling fre-- Tritium analysis of composite > (3 miles below plant- quency not exceeding two hours sample at least once per 92 ' discharge) collected over a period 5 31 days. days. ! Control Station: i Upstream of Andrews Lock and Dam (* 3 miles above plant intake) Page 3 of 5 i - - l
TABLE 2.(con'd) Types of Samples- . . and Sampling Type and Frequency
~ Sampling Locations and of (Distances Given in Miles) Collection Frequency: Analysis Ground Water Indicator Station:
~
Grab sample taken at least Gamma is'otopic and tritium once per 92 days, analyses of each sample. Great Southern Paper Co., Well (SSE-4) Control Station: " Whatley Residence, Well (SW-1) , River Sediment Indicator Station: Grab sample taken at least Gamma isotopic. analysis - l, once per 184 days. of each sample. T' . Downstream of plant discharges at Smith's Bend (s 2 miles) INGESTION Milk Indicator Stations: At least once per 16 days Gamma isotopic and I-131 when animals are on pasture; analysis of each sample. Mr. Mills at least once.per 31 days at Cedar Springs, Ga(SE-4) other times. Control Station: Brooks-Silcox Dairy, Ashford, AL. (WSW-10) Page 4 of 5
-c:w s. .e
~
LTABLEL 2 (c:n'd):
. Types of Samples-and- Sampling- Type and, Frequency ,
' Sampling ~ Locations and gof-(Distances Given in Miles)- . Collection Frequency-. . Analysis Fish Indicator Station: One sample of the'following Gamma isotopic analysis species at least once per 184 on edible' portions. i Downstream of plant discharge days:
~
in vicinity of Smith's Bend .
.(* 2 miles)
Control Station: 1. Game Fish
- 2. Bottom Feeding Fish Upstream of Andrews Lock and-Dam Forage 5 Indicator Station: Grab sample cut from green Gamma ~ isotopic analysis-forage at least once per 31 which includes I-131 North Perimeter (N-0.8) days. analyses of each sample.
South Perimeter (SSE-1.0) Control Station: - Dothan, AL. (W-18) Page 5'of 5
q
*r TABLE 3.
DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT-VALUES FOR THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE CONCENTRATION (MDC)" Airborne Particulate ~ Water or Gas Fish Milk Food Products Sediment
' Analysis (pCi/1) (pCi/m3 )- (pCi/kg. wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/kg. wet) (pCi/kg. dry) gross beta 4 1 x 102 NA NA NA NA H-3 2000 NA NA NA- NA NA Mn-54 15 NA 130 NA NA NA Fe-59 30 NA 260 'NA NA- NA G Co-58, 60 15 NA 130 NA NA NA Zn-65 30 NA 260 NA NA NA ,
Er-95 30 NA NA NA NA. NA Nb-95 15 NA NA NA NA NA-b I-131 l 7 x 102 NA NA NA NA Cs-134 15 5 x 102 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 6 x 102 150 18 60 . . 180 Ba-140 60 NA NA 60 NA NA La-140 15 NA NA 15 NA NA Page 1 of 2
TABLE 3 (con'd)
"The iE)C is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will_be detected with 95% probability with 5% probability of. falsely concluding that-a blank observation represents a "real" signal. .
For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):
-MDC = 4.66 s b E -
V - 2.22 - Y - exp (-AAt) Where: MDC is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above
-(as picoeurie per unit mass or volume).
s b is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or
.of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as .
counts per minute). E is the counting efficiency (as counts per transformation). V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume). 2.22 is the number of transformations per minute per picocurie. Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable). A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide. At is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting (for environmental samples, not plant effluent samples). The value_of sb used in the calculation of the MDC for a detection system shall be used on the actual observed variance of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of the blank samples (as appropriate) rather than on an unverified theoretically predicted variance. In calculating the MDC for a radionuclide determined by gamma-ray spectrometry, the background shall include the typical contributions of other radionuclides normally present in the samples (e.g., potassium-40 in milk samples). Typical values of E, V, Y and At shall be used in the calculations.
'b MDC for drinking water.
20 Page 2 of 2 Lf
~~
j TABLE 4: . REPORTING LEVELS.FOR RADI0 ACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS I'N ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES Reporting Levels Airborne Particulate Water or Gas Fish Milk' Food Products Anslysis (pCi/1) (pCi/m3 ) (pCi/kg. wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/kg.. wet) i H-3 2 x-104a NA NA NA NA Mn-54 1 x 103 NA 3 x 104 NA NA , Fe-59 4 x 102 NA 1 x 104 NA NA Co-58 1 x 103 NA 3 x 10 4 NA NA Co-60 3 x 102 NA 1 x 104 NA NA Zn-65 3 x 102 NA 2 x 104 'NA NA O Zr/Nb-95 4 x 102 NA NA NA NA I-131 2 0.9 NA' 3' 1 x 103 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 103 60 1 x 103 Cs-137 50 20 2 x 103 70 2 x 103 Ba/La-140 2 x 102 NA NA 3 x 102 NA-
"For drinking water samples.
E
, , TABLE 5- . ,
t
, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DEVIATIONS DURING 1984 Date- Location and Nature of Deviation
.1-5-84 Andrews Das Water Sampling Station: Low sample volume for 12-29-83 to 1-5-84; New battery was installed.
6 -Direct Radiation Monitoring Station: First Quarter and
, Annual 1984 TLD's destroyed by vandalism at RC-1605.
1-10-84 North.and South Perimeter Forage sampling locations:
~
Cold. weather damaged plots 0701 and 1601 so badly that 1101 and 1501 were used as substitutes. 1-12 Air Sampling Stations 0701, 1101 and 1218: Low volume for week 1-5-84 to.1-12-84. Flow rate was increased at all stations. 1-17-84 Started sampling indicator milk sample at Cedar Springs, Ga. Supply consists of 1 milk cow. 2-2-84 Dothan Air Sampling Station: Low volume for period 1-26-84 to 2-2-84 due to mechanical failure of the pump. A new pump was installed on 2-8-84.
~2-7-84 North and South Permiter Forage Plots: Deer ate forage at plots 1601 and 0701, substituted 1101 and 1501 for forage samples.
2-9-84 Air Sampling Stations 1601, 0701, 1101 and 1218: Low volume for week 2-2-84 to 2-9-84. Station 1218 pump ~was out of service and not repaired until-2-8-84. Flow
. rates increased at other stations.
2-10-84 Air Sampling Station at 1108: During the semi-annual calibration of the Rockwell Gas Meters the meter at the above-station was found to be in excess of the allowed 10% error. The meter's error was 15.68%. The meter was in service from 7-11-83 to 1-5-84. 3-1-84 Dothan Air Sampling Station. Low volume for period 2-16-84 to 3-1-84 due to mechanical failure of the pump.
'3-6-84 North and South Perimeter Forage Plots: Substituted forage at 1101 and 1501 for plots 1601 and 0701'due to no forage available at 1601 and 0701.
3-8-84 Air Sampling Stations 0701, 0215, 0703 and 1218: Low volume for period 3-1-84 to 3-8-84. Work request written on pumps at 0701, 0215 and 1218. No sample from 0703 for the above period due to broken sample line. It was repaired on 3-12-84. 3-12-84 Milk Indicator Station: Milking terminated. 22
4-5-84: (AirSamplingStations 0701, 1218 and 1101: . Low flow for 10701:for period 3-29-84.to 4-5-84 due to no. electrical'.
' power. . Lightning damaged underground cable. PCR written and station 0501 turned on to compensate. Low volume.
for station:1218 due to mechanical problems with the pump from-3-29-84 to 4-5-84. Lightning damaged ~the-power supply for .1101 resulting-in low volume for 3-29-84 to 4-5-84 4-26-84 .Ashford Air Sampling'-Station:. No sample for period 14-19-84 to-4-26-84:due'to filter holder screen breaking
~ causing-filter paper to' crumble. New filter holder was -
installed.
.4-27-84 Direct Radiation Monitoring Stations. First quarter TLD at station RB-1215, annual TLD at station 1601, first
. quarter TLD.at station ~0901.and annual TLD at station-1304 were lost.
5-24 G.S.P.C. Air Sampling Station: -Low volume for period 5-17-84 to 5-24-84 due to mechanical failure of the
-pump. A new pump was installed on 5-25-84. Started I co11ectionatthisstationatrequestofGa.D.N.R.f$r the NRC Comparison Program.
.5-31-84 Dothan Air Sampling Station: -Low volume for period 5-24-84 to 5-31-84 due to mechanical failure of the pump. A new pump was installed on 6-6-84.
6-7-84 Dothan' Air Sampling Station: Low volume for period 5-31-84 to 6-7-84 due' to mechanical failure of the pump. A new' pump was installed on 6-6-84 6-14-84 Air Sampling ' Stations 1605, 0215 and 1218. Low volume occurred for the above stations for the period 6-7-84 to 6-14-84. Pump.at 1605'was down due to mechanical probleas'. It was repaired on 6-20-84. Flow rates at the other two stations increased. l 6-28-84 Andrews Dam Water Sampling Station: Low volume for 6-21-84 to 6-28-84. New battery installed. This' low
- volume caused monthly composite samples to be' low by 0.5
- gal. '
7-5-84 G.S.P.C. Air Sampling Station: No sample for period 6-28-84 to 7-5-84 due to wasp nest in the intake line. p The line was cleaned. 7-12-84 .Andrews Das Water Sampling Station: No sample for period 7-5-84 due to 7-12-84 due to failure of the
, sampler. A new sampler was installed on 7-13-84.
4 7-17-84 -Air Sampling Stations.0501 and 0215. During the Semi-annual , Calibration of the Rockwell Gas Meters the 0501 meter 23 L V
rx - - error was found to be 21% and the 0215 meter error.was 15%. The meter at 0501 was in service from 1-12-84 to 6-21-84. The meter at 0215 was in service from 1-5-84 to 6-21-84
~
.7-18-84 Direct Radiation Monitoring Station: TLD at station 0401' destroyed by allawn mower.
7-19-84 Ashford Air Sampling Station: No sample for period 7-12-84 to 7-19-84 -due to filter holder screen breaking. A new filter holder was installed. 8-1-84 All Air Sampling Stations: New environmental cabinets were installed to replace old cabinets at all existing air sampling stations. This-installation caused some 5 or 6 day sample periods. The stations affected were
-1101, 1218, 1601, 0501 and 0215 8-16-84 Columbia Air Sampling Station: Low volume for period 8-9-84 to 8-16-84. The flow rate was increased.
8-23-84 Dothan Air Sanpling Station: Low volume for 8-9-84 to 8-23-84 due to mechanical failure of the pump. Pump repaired on 8-20-84 8-30-84 Dothan Air Sampling Station: Low volume for period 8-23-84 to 8-30-84 Flow rate was ' increased.
' 9-6-84 Columbia Air Sampling Station: Low volume for ' period 8-30-84 to 9-6-84 Flow rate was increased.
9-11-84 Direct Radiation Monitoring Station: All TLD's at RB-1215 lost. 9-13-84 Indicator River Water Sanpling Station: No sample for period 9-6-84 to 9-13-84 due to sampler, blowing fuse. A new fuse was installed. 9-27-84 Andrews Dam Water Sampling Station: Low volume for week 9-20-84 to 9-27-84 This caused monthly composite sample to be low by s 0.2 gal. New sampler was installed, t 10-11-84 Blakely Air Sampling Station: Low volume for period 10-4-84 to 10-18-84 due to mechanical problems with the pump. The station was repaired. 10-11-84 Andrews Dam Water Sampling Station: Low volume for 10-4-84 to 10-11-84 A~ new sampler was installed. 10-25-84 Dothan Air Sanpling Station: Low volume for 10-18-84 to 10-25-84, 11-1 to 11-8-84, and no sample for 10-25-84 to 11-1-84 due to mechanical failure of the motor. Motor repaired on 11-6-84 24
10-29-84 State of Ga. obtained a grab sample from Chattahoochee River at Great So. Paper Co._ water intake. Analysis revealed 10800 pCi/1 tritium by State of Ga. Jim Hardeman,
-Ga. Dept of Natural Resources, notified Ken McCracken of results on 12-4-84. Ken McCracken notified W. R. Bayne of results. Radiochemistry incident report # 1-84-005 states that the 10-29-84 tritium level cannot be related to an obvious increase in Hgconcentration from FNP.
The H level was in no way I health hazard to the public. Month $yriverwatercompositesampleresultswerenormal. 11-16-84 All Air Sampling Stations: Eight Day sample period due to schedule conflicts. 11-21 All Air Sampling Stations: Five Day sample period due to holidays. 11-29-84 All Air Sampling Stations: Eight Day sample period due to holidays. 11-30-84 Direct Radiation Monitoring Station: TLD at station 1215 lost. 12-6-84 Air Sampling Stations at 0703 and 0215: Low volume for period 11-29-84 to 12-6-84. The flow rate at both stations was increased. 12-13-84 Andrews Dam Water Sampling Station: Low volume for period 12-6-84 to 12-13-84 due to sampler's tubing cracking. A new sampler was installed. 12-18-84 South Perimeter Forage Plot: Deer ate rye at plot so forage at 1101 substituted. 12-20-84 Blakely Air Sampling Station: Low volume for period 12-13-84 to 12-20-84. Flow rate was increased. 12-21-84 Direct Radiation Monitoring Stations: Annual TLD at RC-1304 and at RI-0901 could not be found. 12-27-84 -Dothan Air Sampling Station: Low volume for period 12-20-84 to 12-27-84 due to mechanical failure of pump. Pump repaired on 12-31-84. 25
TABLEf6' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LOCATIONS EXPOSLRE PATHWAY AND/0R SAMPLE SAMPLING LOCATIONS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
- 1. AIRBORNE .
- a. Particulates Indicator Stations:
River Intak' Structure (ESE-0.8) PI - 0501 South . Perimeter (SSE-I.0) .PI - 0701 Plant Entrance (WSW-0.9) PI - 1101 North Perimeter (N-0.8) PI '1601-Control-Stations: gj Blakely. Ga. (NE-15) .PB - 0215
- Dothan, Ala. (W-18) PB -1 1218 Community Stations:
Great Southern Paper Co. (SSE-3) PC - 0703 Ashford, AL. (WSW-8) PC - 1108 Columbia, AL. (N-5) PC - 1605
- b. Radiciodine Indicator Stations:
River Intake Structure (ESE-0.8) II - 0501-South . Perimeter (SSE-1.0) II - 0701 Plant Entrance (WSW-0.9) II - 1101 North Perimeter (N-0.8) II - 1601 Control Stations: Blakely, Ga. (NE-15) IB - 0215 Dothan .Ala. (W-18) IB - 1218 Community Stations: Great Southern Paper Co. (SSE-3) IC - 0703
~
' TABLE.6 _ .
EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/0R SAMPLE SAMPLING LOCATIONS' SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
~
- 2. Direct Radiation Indicator Stations:
Plant Perimeter. - (NNE-0.9) RI'- 0101- .. (NE-1.0) R I . - '. 0201 ' (ENE-0.9)- RI. .0301' (E-0.8)' RI - 0401 (ESE-0.8) RI - 0501
~
(SE-1.1) . RI - 0601 (SSE-1.0) RI - 0701 (S-1.0): RI - 0801 (SSW-1.0) RI:- 0901 - (SW-0.9) RI - 1001 (WSW-0.9) RI ~1101 (W-0.8) RI.'- 1201-ro (WNW-0.8) RI - 1301 (NW-1.1) RI - 1401 (NNW-0.9): RI - 1501 (N-0.8) RI - 1601
. Control Stations:
Blakely, Ga. (NE-15) RB - 0215 Neals Landing, Fla. RB - 0718 (SSE-18) Dothan, Ala. (W-15) RR - 1215 Dothan, Ala. (W-18) RB - 1218 , Community Stations: (NNE-4) RC - 0104
-(NE-4) RC - 0204 (ENE-4) RC - 0304 (E-5) RC - 0405 (ESE-5) RC - 0505 (SE-5) RC - 0605 (SSE-3) RC - 0703 ;
l
- ~.q
. TABLE 6 ,
EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/0R. SAMPLE SAMPLING LOCATIONS SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION -
- 2. l Direct Radiation (Cont') ,
(S-5) RC - 0805 (SSW-4) 'RC'- 0904
- ( SW-1. 2 ) ' RC - 1001 (SW-5)- RC - 1005' (WSW-4) RC - 1104-(WSW-8) RC - 1108.
(W-4) RC 1204 (WNW-4) RC - 1304 (NW-4) RC - 1404 (NNW-4) -RC.- 1504 (N-5) RC - 1605
- 3. WATERBORNE o$ a. Surface Indicator-Station:
Great Southern Paper WRI Intake Structure (River Mile-40) Control Station: Andrews Lock & Dam thper. Pier (River Mile-47) WRB
- b. Ground Indicator Station:
Great Southern Paper-Co. Well (SSE-4) WGI - 07 Control Station: ~ Mr. Whatley (SW-1.2) .WGB - 10
- c. Sediment Indicator Station:
Smith's Bend (River Mile-41) RSI
F TABLE 6 . EXPOSURE PATHWA'Y AND/0R ' SAMPLE SAMPLING LOCATIONS SAMPLE IDENTIFIC'ATION 4 INGESTION -
- a. Milk . + Indicator Station:
Mr. Mills Cedar Springs, Ga. (SE-4) MI - 0604. . Control Station: Brooks-Silcox Dai ry, Ashford, Ala. (WSW-10) MR - 1110
- h. Fish Indicator Station:
Smith Bend (River Mile-41) Game Fish FGI Bottom Feeding Fish . FBI Control Station:
- Qj Andrews Lock A Dam Reservior (River Mile-47)
Game Fish 'FGR Bottom Feeding Fish FBB
^
- c. Forage Indicator Stations:
South Perimeter (SSE-1,0) FI - 0701 North Perimeter (N-0.8) FI - 1601 Control Station: Dothan, Alabane (W-18) FB - 1218
+ Sampled from Jan.1 until March 12 when milking was discontinued. *
- V
- . e e
. - ,E n a m t
. eN e g
- .me -*- . -.
.~e
~=
. - ~.,
~ -
.. -- . e
= = 0,'
( .u. : E
-5'.
. .~.
e n L-n .
-m.gI.2.
!W w_E=.:. 4
-. -s e-Ac
*4 e.
-5 g
e--
.4
. .c e
. . w v
*O
! : , 2
- RE E -
g y 23 CE.
- ~
~
* . . .I-
. . ~e
, ~
e ' 8
- -!. ... ..E i
. Es gR. =
.- .: E:.
s
. w 3 '.
I5,5l: i*
$ s. =* s r a :
- c=ra d i d v
- e. .
. i. 5 IE. :. . --
3 5- i. t q, 2 *. 3. .
.22-I :.. .
.= e . .
Im .):xt:
. ~ .g.
c 2. ' 0. . . 2. C. .
-a s' * ~e ec: - - .
w 1" s :I I .:
~
. .d I.
m : E, .
'*4
- e. e c = 3
.w.
.f..
= --
E
= . -. E.. J..
Etag- . I I UI
-.: :: ja I E
5 -ra,. z E: w. E: . .t m . y g t= .tm . . .g
,.E.
v.
. $ :. 3 .. m.
.m .
1 m . 3.
. 1"1 22 u E $g6 =:
-m..
*l 22 - 32 '22 :
22 32- : ..! E
.z
-. - ,- m . . .=,= . .e x
. . ,= -P
- g. e . oc ee .e .
.W Ik3 -, .KE.: 34 d ad 34 Zd 1
- g 5- E -
x- l
-
- l.1 c.
l- E' R 3 2 1,43 34 3.
~K .E ,1 * , ! .0 3 R E. n 8 -
ll t- a
. Wk4 -
.c ,o
. 5 = c. ,e -
e a a
- t8 i .T ' .
- as . -. - . ~. . -
I i w i E.3 !. !. ~eE ,
~
ms ~i e . !. Oi
- e. ~i wrimi E
E -.g5. E Wm .: =4
-8
*d E.4 I ~
E. . o M- l e- e- e- e e rA3.1*{ v 1 jt
.E (21 -:
~ e g
e e:2 E I.a i ! i E E Ir: .3= EW
=
=- e
. I.
e c
= -Algf
= -
-- o f -
c .: .. ~ m m E 3
*1*t.
8
. -. .s- . .
=2 l*tk
*z:
I . . I 133
-
- A A
- E -
En I m.:. A x ~. . . E
~. ~. ~. 1 - *.*I k u
A v w
= # .
, . l 1.,... ,
& W. .e. .. b
&,3 E .
f l t."1 A L m . 03'lJ I. Y I l a g: . .C hE.3 *
- c. ... .
5 a424 l E .: -
.- o
~
>N. YN e-s. .
E$ f , 30-L:
I ARE t IHH.? IIlf RilAt RMHAlllWe . IF(RAlll4IAt NNIIDACittlIV 5HMitART JOSEPil M. I AltLLT MKtiAA PlMel t ICE MSI till5. MPT.7 AMI NPF.M. HER15tiNI CutmlV. M ASAMA January . Deresilier,1984 (a) Mt IMilCA10R list lCAllet llKAll001 Willi tilGetSI AleMlat M AM CuttesNilt tilfelpl4 M D1:28 set iYPE Alel iDCA110lls . . . . . . . - . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . - tlKAllpW5 t ilf AlllHt$ PAllelAY 5AMPflH IIllAl IRepeltli 0F letellitAl ME AN (I) (r) MAfE M All (f) (c) M Aft (f) (c) M AN (f)(r) (leesti 15 M A5180tlM NI) MIAt TM S PI Ri p# Mill Imc (b) R Alel4(r) DISBNKf ANil 111PIClioll RAtNJ (r) RAMIX (r) R AlwJ (rl IID . 1) masterly Gross Gemia 141 10.0 18.3(67/67) East Perimeter 75.3(3/3) 15.3 (77/17) IF. 9 (11/11) (MtNt) (17.6 31.3) 0.R Miles . E (24.1 76.0) (R.30 21.1.) (11.3 - 78.4) ILO . Annual Gross r - 34 to.n 55.1 (14/14) East Perimeter FM.? (t/l) 44.1 (11/17) %.9 (3/3) (MerAO) (35.5 78.7) n.4 Miles . t .... (?lt.1 57.7) (45.1 - 61.5) IID . Annuald Gross Gamma 35 10.0 70.9(14/I4) East Perimeter 101. (1/I) 61.7 (IR/lH) 141. 4 ( 3 / 3) (MtAp) (57.9 101.) 1.0 Miles . M .... (%7.1 17.7) (5f. 5 16.H) to. (a) No soonroutine Anomalous Measuremente perorted During Tlelo Pertuel. (b) lower I.lett of Detectinse me DefineJ In NA5fe)00, for Lir TLIhe no Achieveable in Practice. (r) Mean and Range Remed on Detectable Meanierceents only. Fractions of Detectable Meannrements at SpecificJ I.arat tan in Parenthesia (f). (J) Sam of Four fjesarters for Comparative Purposes.
'/ '
et
! : 4-E.x;_ l ?-
= ,3 : ~,..
W W E sw= =i g :. E -r
~. I E *
?
- Em 21 w v 4
- 4*
. 7 -
l
- I f
- 1 !
Ogl_!: . .
- 6 t
5 ~ ,g:. 2 -
.l:yt2 =t: : -
i )
! 2 2: : E i I:. :
- - t g'; E . ,
s - TE 1 1 E.0_: 3: 2. I :* E t k
-{ -:
' li 3lr= jl:l 45
= =:
=.
I -
. :: E: .
=: :: . !
I5:f_*
=
g.
- 2:
v . E 5
= -
- rEE Q *I :x - 2
- E-~ :: g!:
- 5 U :[W w' s! -
F. 13
- [ j.
s -
- a m.
_=. x: g:
=
". -.2.
r3 u - Eg _3 m..
-:g_e
. i =.
iA
. *: .it.
g3 I . g
~
= d~E !.
4 E s 3.~I'<.I u.. Imk = - : E .37*
, %. 5*3 : SE . # ER'
-s.
u g 8 -,. .. . re S-r
= . ;
g7 3 m gS $
= s5*E5:
. 2=. g~
i ! Ia: gg. a
= 10 a =.
A.EI EE: 4 d i .s i
- m. _
2: g j WE: s
==.
.. - 1. ,d .t-
- u. v .
* -E g 43 I. a:
a.. x .e
. _1 m s
-I w q -
. ~*g e
. 7 E ..g - ..I
=
3 [2;2 At. g m: i -l1
; 21 -
5 2: 2
. sx S f 1
-I I L!
C': akLt 5E:: -_ - 36 a
.=j -
_E 1_ _ ~ , C_. 2-{8
- eg I a. O . bO 32 L
IAME f 06 4 VltJIAilule: F0ItAr.E. VIMIA8tE5 ANI Firulls . OP(RAlltueAI. #Apl0ACIIVITY sentar
.HIMPM M. FAttiV le8Cll AA PI Affi LICENSE DOS. luPF-2 Asm MPF-8, H005T0H CfluMIV. M AMAMA January . Decmher,19R4(a)
Att imilCAIUlt flWICAluft 10 Call 018 WiiH HirJd5I AfefRIAL M Age C0feUIIIIT CHIIIeNt M ItNt ist IVPt Assa 10CAII00:5 ...-----.-....-...-.....---.. .......- -..- 10CATIDIts illC Allim% PAltasAV 5AMPIID IulM lluMit(R DI IHetlhAl ME All (f ) (c) leaME ME A88 (f)(c) M Aff (f } (c) M Asl (f )c) (phli 14 M A%uplM MI) AMAl1515 PiltinkfilD NhC (b) R Anri (c) pl%IAsert ANs nipfClines Raser.t (,) R Aser4 (,) nassa (r) Fora 9e (d) Cassoa Spec 36 (PCl/kg - Dry) lie.7 660 4260. (24/24) genrth Perleeter 9900. (3/3) .... 269n. (12/12) (1450. 18700.) 0.9 Miles - NHW (7510. - 11700.) (129n. . s.020.) K-40 626. 13100. (24/24) North Perimeter 20200,(3/3) .... 18400. (12/12) (3400. 27500.) 0.9 Miles . PflW (11200. 27500.) (52n0. - 4 3400. ) Cs.134 i 43.0 .... .... .... .--. 93.0 (I/12). Es.137 63.8 15.6(7/24) Isorth Perimeter 104. (2/3) -.-- fe6.3 (4/12) w (53.0 - 112.) 0.9 Miles - 8188 (95.0 - 112.) (44.0 - 16%.) w
- it.20tl 69.0 94.0 (1/24) learth Perimeter 94.0 (1/3) - . - .-..
--- 0.9 Miles Isled .-..
81-212 835. 1100. (1/24) Plant intrance 1100. (1/4) ---- 179. (1/12)
..-- 0.9 Miles . W5W --. .---
Pb-212 183. -- --.. --.. ..-. 2H5. (1/12) Bl.214 163. 266. (6/24) Plant intrance 4%. (1/4) ---- 332. (2/12) (RF.0 - 496.) 0.9 Miles - W5W ---- (120. 441.) Pb.214 159, 236. (2/24) Plant Entrance 320. (1/4) .. .... (152. 320.) 0.9 Miles W5W ...- Ac.22R 310. 481. (2/24) Sn=th Perimeter 516. (1/9) --.- ..-- l (446. 516.) 1.11 Miles - SM l .... l (a) es., skmssout Ine Naeusemente steporteJ therIng his ret tod. (b) M.kn Mintamm Detectable Concentratione Calculated rer4 F uation I of h la Report Delag Actual Sample Bankgrounds. (A resterintl) (c) Mean and Ranse Based on Detectable Measuremente only. Fasetton of Detectable Measurements at Speelfled Imatlane in rateetheele(f). (d) Mean Idet/ Dry Ratte for 8984 use 1.79 (e) Seelset laute kmcations Due to 11ssavailability of Forage at Furage Pint eus Ensth Ferleeter'DurIng Lee Sampling reriods.
r - I Anlt Isen.5 5011. IIPf RAllenAI RAltlGAClivilf SUMMpat , J054Pfl M. FAstty Inst.ti Alt Pl Agei 1101185I Hel5. Birf.7 AMI Nrt.n. Hitl510H CDllellV, AL ADMIA Janesary . Decce4 er,1984 ( ) l All IMilCAI0lt llellCAlle IflCAl10H Willi N1080tsi AfstetAl HI Afl Colecent ly . CoselseN N :lle la Irrt Aset toCAllons ........ .............................-...- IsitAltner$ I sir Allpers FAltesAT SmertiIB ICIAt MINIf R IK IstMIHAl MtA01(f)(r) IIRf( M All { f )(r) M A88 (I)(r) R Afl (IIlrI (Hrsit la MIA50RIMINI) AllAlT515 PfRinPMlp HNC (b) RAserJ (c) DI51Alg.I Asilt silettillies R Asu1(c) R AswJ g,) N Aen'.I (el Soll (in $llo) t h $i n IF (rtift9 . pry) pc.7 %)n. .... .... .... < nW. .... R.40 579. 66190. (1/7) East Perimeter In48Mt. (t/l) 1530. (3/3) 7f self. (7/7) (977. 14400.) 0.8 Miles - t .... (1779. 1979.) ( 1170. . .tP Fil. ) Es.131 46.8 791. (7/F) toest Perimeter 467 (1/3) Fle. (3/3) 3em. (7/7) 1 (166. 467.) p.A Miles . taaf .... (117. - 343.) (7fe%. 351.) Il-7pn 174. 165. (7/F) fast Perimeter 154ft. (1/3) 465. (3/3) . 615. (7/7) (404. 1%40.) 1.ft Miles . M .... ( M4. . %63.) . ($1%. . n n. )
$ 111 717 A91. 1520. (6/7) East Perimeter Flin. (t/l) 11:1n. (3/3) 1140. (7/7)
(971. 2770.) 1.0 titles . M .... (741. . 1650.) (949. - l len.) Pb-Fl? 335. 7029. (1/l) East Perimeter 39)(1 (I/l) 106n. (3/3) 1650. (7/7) (lan. 393n.) 0.8 Miles . t .... (693. 17018.) (1510 11188.) 81 714 188. 1180. (1/l) Seeth Perimeter 73no. (t/I) into. (3/3) 1310. (7/7) (1070. 73nn.) 1.n Miles - 55w .... (non. 17 m.) (llem. 5%In.) Ph.714 110. 16tet. (1/7) East Perimeter ??f*D (I/I) Il90. (3/3) 14181. (7/7) (994. . Fifia.) 0.n Miles . I .... (Insen. 179n.) (17no. 167n.) ps.776 In6n. 13161 (I/F) East Perimeter 1180. (I/l) 10ln. (1/3) I l 9't. (l/7)
.... l.9 Miles - pt .... .... ....
A.778 319, 71181 (1/1) last Perimeter 407tt. (1/3) life. (1/3) IM90 (7/7) (1840. 4n70.) 1.ft Miles . M - .. (178m. . tilo.) (14f 88. 7 8781.) (a) 80e levaroeotine Ancealene Measuremente Repor teel thering This Perin.8. (le) Mren Mlatoons Itetectalele Concent rat ton Calenlascel rer Fquat len I af Thin Report poing Artesal Saarle Rae bare.ennis (A reenter Ier 1). (r) Mran aseel Range Bene.1 en Detect elete peemeuremente namely. Fract ismo nf pre ertafele Mena.orementa at Sperific.I fu ntinng In ratentleesta(I).
I R R R R FE ~ f5-:! C "
- 2: :: : m: 2: : . : 2: I n -: -: : : -: : : -: v
. = n g a = .. = I !.
-< git.
!W e r. g -
4 SC
-- g w
- O g -
1e 7g
!. 3= i6
- I
-**0 i
5x,; ;. .
- g,, .
l .: : : : : : : : : I
. g g .s s W{.: *
=
. =
E. ! ! J
- E :: - - - -
i i { :-w E E 4 i i : Im I :..,.x , . 7J 7
- s. s.
m - Ti s.
~
72
.s .
CJ s.
~
_.L
- : : _ -1 : : - . : ' --e
- . 3 -*g.f..
- f 'E :. E a, m
g g a, gg ga , ,3 2;
. .~ mm m
= g ; -m -- -- - 6 .
E = .. * -
- m. .
.t8
- . ..=ch6 g
E
- - E 4
- z. -. 6 6 6 6 . ,
-!-3 Es E! I I I I Is y9
-7 I Es_ ,5 = <.
. E. .! 6 6 = = se
;3g
- g. m: .a5 .= .= e
. .e .c .e e.
. . _6 E EG- _: g:: 1. 2 2. 2. At g E ==c
=
m -m -2 g - 1.j E 5 :. a: y: j= j= . i j= j-= 3, :z . t 3
. .- =. e :. s.
- s. . t.
- s. t. x. :. 2-
- 2-:h e;.
=
y n gfg
- - I z: am as as am 21 ;;
- . .=
a_wi =
- r _f 2t
=~1 z2 . : - - - - -
4 = - a s - 3 g 5k- . s_g- 2., . 7? s 7s . . 7;- s 75 s R; s . i= d* . _e I e _ s n=-: : c' :: : :
~-
- - ~>
*1
- g as s -i.
y :r ,6ai.ii Es".!
=8r.. s --t.m s. ' s. i. .
[ - x* 5 em 2s! . {2l : .t i i Ig EU: nn: 2 i a E A E A o i e i
?
5 a G y
. h0'Ei
=. _c L_ i m _6 5 a: . . m = 7 ; tt
- r. --
w
-- e I. 27
- 6 .&
EE t I i , y .h, *J I@mu i . 9 ~ t m
- ~ I- l6 -
3 v-E-sI:.: a e : = a = - a e- a =.= t i,e.t 2 - 3 333
- t 4E.
. du.
- l 2_ a[
{ g w
- g. -
w_ *
* ! E -
~
E="
$. * { *. ! -
- : aass i).:
Km . j - m eu. m
- s. . , - -
== _
as . es3: J1 r - 37, 35
l
- k. 6x:. . . . . . . . .
= O :
5 aw=g Is; ,3. : . . . . . . g 2 c:r.: '
.{
, - 1_
- : I
. 6
-sz,0:.
5=0 I f
. . . . . . . . . 6 I .*
w W r.. E . - 'I I I .: !
. - - t .t.
I: : 4 - d , 7 - E E' E ! R$ d CE R$ ~$ d k C I* $'
-l '!,t::
l$. - R. R 3 -=. =
. S '. et .. O '. S' S '. .C R- t' R- k.
e
. 2 I
L
,El'.
" er.
E ;r.: ,E _! :1 SE E. E" , E.s *t E1 -
.I Ia g _Eg ; .. . . _- --
_ I_E ~- E _~ -- . ,
*l l 1
~
=.
- . E:.
A
-[
- - =
g- , E ., w ..
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
F .=. W I : i i i i i A A
. E. :. - _i _ _i _ _ _ _i E rSC * *
- g Er 6
g: 'g W . :
. 1
&& 1.
11 ] .A AA && A1 AA &&
. a '. 1 '. 1 '. 1 '. 1 '. ; A g4 6
a!*' ?46 I T I ?46 I II
- l $[.I E
- "J st w .
I I TI e6
*I #I 4 6 I
- I
- I e6 I I ?"
46
*I 46
- I
?I 46
*I g
as am sa as as as
-a _i .: I U z .; a s a m _I -I 1 f . Eei - E =.t -
l 6 . 2- ! r r ~- (5,l 5 1, e ~! __~ ,a. -.,g ..;m a l er ! e: u - es
- . ~
=. t, =. =- - e
-~
~_rt-e . :-
.. E E==:::
. ,. ~ . .
- u. u. S.
. . . ... 1.:.
a
.g
_E g sul W g r. .
*~ ** *
. __~ -* .I E .*
~@ .* k .' .E. " I I
~
Ee . .
- b.
j r.
# . E
~ m
,. E S h k
,= e m
; ~ e ~ ~ . 5 - A A
__.-- a
. .e. E- ==
3
. - m.
=
*g
=a !e ~
A i_v-: l:. 5s a a
=
~
a
~
e
~
a
~
e
~
~
4 12
.t 1
>C . , I
- e. ==
.b e
,' e d E
-l
!. II p.h *=
r.
, - .3ITa 6<*
- yIb!
gg"g g5=l. Sm.
~~ -
>I ! YF - d Eg l' --te, k de .
36
o _ l ANI f Iart.3 f 1588: Cl'CR - OPERAIIIIIIAS BApfelACIITllV 541MMRflV s Jn5EF96 II. FAmt[T Iserti All Pt AIII LICIIISE 1805. IIPF.? Asse Irf.38. McW5fful titWIIT. M AlWMA Jonesary . leecesher.194f a) l ML llRelCAlta laelltAlta IHCATIGet WilM Mif30f 5I AIIIntAt M AN Ctecemtly CetIll#Ht M*;Itet le 1VPt AIED LOCAIIGers ............... ................... .... I fl[ AIIflI6 i ser. AIIDIt% PAIMIsAv 5Nirlife telas Iepella at Isestimmt M Aas (t) (c) M Ass (f) (r) M Ass,(t)(r3 genesl MM ( t )(r) (IIIIll til M A'.IIIrlfelNI) A8BAl V%f 5 PlWIHIIMID MC (b) RAfsl3 (r) Isl%I Afsti Ages plWICIIMI RAgua (r) R Afu3 (r ) W A88 3 (r ) I isle (t;a-c) ("aene
. Spec 4 (ptl/kg . tort lissese)
E.40 99.0 232ft. (7/2) $selth's penst 737tl. (7/7) .... 1%81. (7/7) ( 8n70. 7 mitt.) River Mlle. 4147 (181785. 7810.) (154n. 717p.) Cs.131 15.3 42.9 (7/2) 5silth's tenst 47.11(7/2) .... 76.n (7/7) (27.8 - 67.0) River Mlle. 41 42 (??.0 67.0) (7%.n . Fr.st) 5 Ish (not tuse Iecallag Gaune Spec 4 (rt.8/tg Idet Ilssue K.40 131. lege. (7/2) $selth's Denil 18988 (7/7) --..
??7tl. (7/7) w (17w. 74,n.) alver Mlle. 41 47 2490.)
y (1790. (In7n. 7s.7n.) Cs.lu 13.n < Mc .... .... .... 19.n (7/7) (li.a . 78.nl . e (a) Bee Isonsmet tne Assumenlaae Mrenestement e Idese Depor ted therlag 11ela rerind. , (b) Mrme Mielease Inctectable Caserent rat ione Calculated rer rquat Inse I of This prport lentes Artenal Same.le Ra bge nwe.8m (A Poetestar8). (c) Mreso esed Raenge Based IIpose Iers ert able Mraeuseernt e thely. Frart toes of tortert alele Measuremeneta me Specif sc.I Im at Icean See rarentinente (1).
- o. ,
ATTACHMENT : 1984 LAND USE SURVEY FOR RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT 4 This Land Use Survey was performed June 29-to July 9, 1984 to meet the requirements of the Farley Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications, Section 3.12.2 and 4.12.2. A. Houston County, Alabama Mr. A. M. Mathews, Houston County Extension Agent, was contacted for the purpose of reviewing known locations of milk animals in the county. Mr. Mathews stated he was not aware of any changes since the last milk animal survey (August 1983). A house-to-house canvas of residents along Alabama 95 for a distance of about three miles from the plant entrance and for about a mile west on Houston County 42 revealed no milk animals. Individuals contacted along this canvas were Walter Whatley and Lula Mae McGriff. Simultaneous with the milk animal canvas, the nearest residence in each of the meteorological sectors was identified. B. Early County, Georgia Mr. Wayne Tankersley, Early County Extension Agent, was contacted to determine if any milk animals were currently prasent in the county. He knew of only one person. This lead was checked out and Mr. Bush did not have any milk animals. A house-to-house canvas of residents in the area across the Chattahoochee River west of the plant was negative with respect to the presence of milk animals. Individuals at the following residences were questioned: Jim Donaldson and Mrs. Walter Mills. Simultaneous with the house-to-house milk animal canvas, the nearest residence in each meteorological sector was identified. C. Results.and Conclusions The results of the Land Use Survey are shown in Table 1. Based on the survey results, no change in the present milk sampling program is required. MISC #7 38
P o , 1984 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SURVEY (DISTANCE MILES TO NEAREST) , RADIAL SECTORS (22\ DEGREES) RESIDENT MILK ANIMAL North Northeast (01) 2.5 >5 Northeast (02) 2.4 >5 East Northeast (03) 2.3 >5 East (04) 2.8 >5 East Southeast (05) 2.9 >5 Southeast (06) 3.4 >5 South Southeast (07)- >5 >5 South (08) 4.3 >5 South Southwest (09) 2.9 >5 Southwest (10) 1.2 >5 West Southwest (11) 2.6 >5 West (12) 1.3 >5 West Northwest (13) 2.1 >5 Northwest (14) 2.4 >5 North Northwest (15) 2.0 >5 North (16) 2.6 >5 l t I 39 L
MalNng Addrest
. Ala?' m] Power Comp 29y 600 North 18th Strxt Pcst OfSce Bom 2641
- B, emir gham Atanama 3520' . Telephone 205 7834090 -)*,, R. P. Mcdonald [ Unl$'[gNoYg* AlabamaPdiyCfp 69 April 29,1985 N DocketNos[10~3645534B U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Region II Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street, N.W. Atlanta, GA 30323 RE: Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Annual Environmotal Operating Report Gentlemen: The attached " Annual Environm3ntal Operating Report, Part B: Radiological" for the period ending December 31, 1984, is transmitted in accordance with the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specifications Sections 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.7 If you have any questions, please advise. Yours very uly,
.A
]i /
R. P. Mcdonald RPM /KWM: sam Attachment cc: Mr. W. H. Bradford (W/ Attachment) Document Control Desk, (18 copies, W/ Attachment) U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Director, Bureau of Radiological Health (W/ Attachment) State of Alabama Director, Environmental Protection Division (W/ Attachment) State of Georgia c
,,5 g '>
\
\}}