ML20138Q550

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:11, 28 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 851126 Meeting W/Util,Beta & Consolidated Controls Corp in Bethesda,Md Re Proposed Changes to Safety Features Actuation Sys.Viewgraphs & List of Attendees Encl
ML20138Q550
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/1985
From: De Agazio A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TAC-43253, NUDOCS 8512270290
Download: ML20138Q550 (17)


Text

December 17, 1985 b Docket No. 50-346 LICENSEE: Toledo Edison Company FACILITY: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No.1

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING - NOVEMBER 26, 1985 ON SFAS MODIFICATIONS On November 26, 1985, a meeting between Toledo Edison Company and the NPC was held to discuss proposed changes to the Safety Features Actuation System (SFAS) at Davis Besse. The modifications are to resolve an ongoing concern regarding certain shared power returns which bring into question the adequacy of redundant channel independence and compliance with IEEE 279. The issue arose as a result of an event at the station on December 5,1980. As a result of system reviews being conducted as follows-up to the June 9,1985 event, Toledo Edison Company determined that this issue should be resolved prior to the unit being returned to power.

Enclosure 1 is the discussion material presented by Toledo Edison Company.

Enclosure 2 is a list of attendees.

Toledo Edison plans to make a formal submittal of the proposed modification by the first week of December.

Information which must be submitted for review includes:

Marked up electrical schematic / elementary diagrams of the SFAS changes.

Description of the changes.

Testing procedures that will be used to demonstrate electrical independence between redundant SFAS instrument channels following the modifications.

Discuss the periodic surveillance (monitoring) to be performed on the floating returns following the modifications.

Ortr!ml emad by Albert De Agazio, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #6 Division of PWR Licensing-B

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/ enclosures:

See next page PBD-6 ,

8512270290 851217

/De Agaz~ DR ADOCK 05000346 p

PDR 12f/ /8

": i -

a*mm v

( y4 e 7

a

.e a

TOED 0 EDISW CGPMY DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POER STATIM .

> LNIT 1

. . l SEETY EATUES ACTUATIm SYSTEM i 014NEL INDEPENDENE r

9

+ **

MEETING AGENDA: Safety Features Actuation System Channel Independence

, )

PLACE: B&W offices, Suite 220 7910 Woodnont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland TIME: November 26, 1985 9:00 am .

PURPOSE: Proposed Upgrade to SFAS (SLIDE 1) I. Description of Davis-Besse SFAS la (See Attached)

(SLIDE 2) II. Description of December 5, 1980 Event (Narrative Attached)

III. Options Available (SLIDE 3) 1. Monitor for Ground Faults' (SLIDE 4) 2. Tie Floating Common to Ground (SLIDE 5) 3. Physically Separate Commons Between Sa ,b Channels

4. Separate Sensor Channel Commons (SLIDE6a,6) b IV. Implementation Schedule A. Package Preparstion By 11/30/85 B. Installed Post-Modification Tests Complete By 12/15/85 C. Following Implementation, SFAS Monthly and 18-Month Tests Will Be Run V. Questions and Answers
71. NRC Staff Feedback I

e 5

5

(

e. , + - ,F - - ..

4

3

. +

l 4

i SFAS - AS CURRENTLY WlRED CHI CH2 X. ,

CHANNELi g CHANNEL 2 -

e SENSOR e SENSOR W LOGIC 3 LOGIC TO LOGC* TO LOGIC -

CH I,2,3,4 CH 1,2,3,4 -

~

AND AS AND SFAS DEVIT DEVICE CH3 CH4 XMTR XMTR

  • SENSOR SENSOR TO LOGlC+ myg W mc TO LOGIC-+--CHANNEL E '

CH l .2,3,4 CH l.2,3,4 CHANNEL 3 CHANNEL 4 5 SENSOR CHANNELOPTICALLY ISOLATED FROM LOGIC CHANNEL Slide 1

- -+.:,- -- - , - - m y - W

. . SFAS AS CURRENTLY WWED l

i UI XMTR Is0 @ siSTA:x.s N PS A

Og Og 0

_ SENSOR 1 1 g___ _ _______

i TO OTW H8VAC -

' icd $n.

Yi(Ya) . ' mCu oTe

',.ACTUATON CHANNELS .

]P i i P l g i OUTPUT

@ LOGIC SUPPLIES I l l l COMMON CUTPUT 1 TO N TED g

RELAY T DEVICE' .

SMS CHANNEL i(2) LEBE!D

. C= COMMON A= Il8MAC FEID COMMON (C) +5s + SVDC POWER 15VDC POWER 24=24VDC F0WER h RIs LA I

^

U1 ~

ISO XMTR BISTABLE ,

@t @

s.stse____ __"rt t t  % _d _ _ m ACTUATION l ig, ll8VAC '

l ,

i .,CMme n s .

i Y3(Y4) ,RDM g I

1 r , , 1 r y LCNMcES I l l OUTPUT LDGIC POWER SuPPuES h

~

4 l iI l COMMON f OUTPUT L TO ACTUATED p RELAY T DEVICE g

SFAS CHANNEL S(4) Ly Slide la

NARRATIVE OF DECEMBER 5, 1980 EVENT

1. Plant was in shutdown condition, following a December 3,1980 reactor trip due to DC ground fault (outside SFAS). ,

l

2. Shortly.after December 3 trip, a ground fault was identified in SFAS.

This fault caused SFAS SAM, lights which are normally off to flicker on. '

3. In the course of troubleshooting, SFAS Channel 3 was de-energized.

This channel was chosen randomly, as fault was either in Channel 1 or Channel 3. j

4. ' Channel 3 was re-energized . Channel 3 bistables were still in a ,

tripped state, which is normal following loss of power. I

5. One Channel 3 output module had a light out. When bulb was removed, )

an inadvertent tie between cabinet (station ground) and power supply common occurred (this is functionally shown as 2).

l

6. This inadvertent tie caused 3 amp AC supply fuse to power supply PS 1 107 to blow. This was due to tha failure of PS 107 (functionally '

shown as 1) in which a fault in supply caused 118 VAC on power supply secondary (DC) side.

~

7. Loss of PS 107 caused Channel I bistab'les to trip. Since Channel 3 bistables were already tripped, a 2-out-of-4 condition resulted, causing a full SFAS actuation.

l l

e l

l 1

DECEMBER 5, 1980 EVENT Il8VAC (Yl) r-------------- l

. I"d "2 "h d "d "d N I I

.! ' rid l l PSIO5 PSIO6 IlPSIO7 lPSIO9l l I

. ji l l .. ,3= .isu ,i - - . =

l i

6P j I

l PSilO PSIll PS!!2 l

l 1

+24VDe + 24VDC .24VDC l l '

1 . ,l  ;

I si

. L _ _ _ _$r^S = a" ' '

_ _ _ _g _ _I p, T CAUSING ll8VAC ON T COMMON (Fl.OATING') CASINET POWER WPPLY

- TlED TO STATION SECONOUlY GROUND ll8VAC (Y3) r------------- 7 and ud u@ u@ u ud  %.@  !

1 I I

I l PS 305 PS 306 PS 307 PS 32 l 1 1

+ voc m voc + voc -evoc I i

l l 1

I l

PS 310 PS 311 PS312 l 1 I .

I +uvoc + u= +ua I

< ^ l l ' T 2 l l I

! t _ _ _SLASEANNE 3_ ,

[ _jhINADVERTENT T TIE TO STATION CABINET GROUND TIED TO STATION GROUND Slide 2 i___

L .' .

TTIW: MONITOR FOR GRCUND FALTCTS MANTAGES o DOESNOTCOMPRQ4ISESYSTEMRELIABILITY.

o CURRENTLY BEING DONE ON A MONTHLY BASIS.

DISADVANTAGES

'o RENFR SFAS TO A TWO CH#4NEL SYSTEM.

o DiTECTION OF A. FAULT. AFFECTING TWO SENSOR CHANNELS MJST BE PHYSICALLY CLEARED..

Slide 3 l

w _ . _ _ - - .

.y. ,

1 G7fl@: IIE Ctr+1oN TO GROLND - - -

l 1

AtNANTAGES l

o ASSURES -THAT SFAS IS .ItttNE TO A SINGLE FAILLRE Mi!CH COULD AFFECT TWO SENSOR CHMNELS.

o CHANGE REGUIRES NO NEW OR C m PLICATED HARDWARE.

o CHANGE IS SIMPLE TO ACCCWLISH. '

R .

o PROVIDESPOSITIVERESULTS. -lFAFAULTOCCURSITIS IffEDIATELY-CLEARED, NO WILL RESULT IN A TRIP OF CHNINEL CMTAINING FAULT.

DISADVANTAGES o CHANGE t%KES SFAS MORE . SUSCEPTIBLE TO SPURIOUS TRIPS.

c-o POTENTIALPERSCNNELSAFETYFROBLEMS.

r M Slide 4 L tr.

- - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ . _ _ _ . _ e a w -v- e e. w - +

. l

'~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ^^ ~ " ~ ~

TTIm: PkYSICALLY SEPARATE C0ft10NS BETWEEN 0%NNELS MANTAGES o ASSURES THAT SFAS -IS 4PtplE-TO A SINGLE FAILWE WICH 00UQ AFFECT TWO SENSOR CHAPNELS.

o DOES.NOT.MAKE SFAS.MORE SUSCEPTIBLE:TO SPURIOUS TRIPS OR EGLIIPtENT DHAGE.

DISADVANTAGES

= ExrENSIVEFIELDWIRINGANDHARDWAREREQUIRED.

o QJRRENT SYSTEM SPACE LIMITATIONS WOULD NOT ALLOW COR '

AIE!TIONAL TERMINATIONS REQUIRED.

o SYSTEMRELIABILITYREDUCTION.

Slida 5 i

4 i

Rf/SICALLY SEPARATED C01DE ETWEEN OWlES i .=

5"AS SFA,5 '

CW l(Z) BUS CH 3(4) sus

+24 VDC + 24 VDC '

LA LB

'LA IS ' , 1 i l bus

~

r Bus -

1

- ',i 1

I ' WIRES To EE v v

$wDELETED .

A' '

. G

, 5. sal (2) & SAS(4)

SE  :  :, --.4 - - - _SE - e-

==6h(cteso __u . __eg.,b aesci == a 1 sal (2) '

q L ,_ u _ ;t-c__ _sc {5A3(4) t C SC  ;

b (CPEM)

(pi (dPEN S. S A102) i < 5A3(c) l

- SD ^

'---y--- s -

- y.

50- ,- .

M  : .: _

I '

OVDC .

O VDC~

< WIRES ( CONTACTS - .

. TO SE.ADDED

(, REFLECTS REVISION REQUIRED TO DWG.E-30B,SH.4)

?

l Slide Sa c.

PHYSI.CALLY SEPARATED C@lTNS BEBEEN OWiELS 5FA5 SFAS.

CH.I(2) SUS Ch.3 (4) SUS 12.4VOC . 424VDC T_ T LA 16 L A B U'S ; d  : LE BU5 ; $  ;

w . **

13 WlRES TOBE DELETED __

l AM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _;_ _E _.

h1 SAi(2)

.~. _~ K A

_ o gy

,,C.

[

5 A 3(4)

JCS 4W B O

, 4_ _ _g _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i ,_8W c, .

T_

CLOSE l CLOSE I C_. 'O WIRES ( CCNTACTS C l .C_

To SE Acomo I

' }!!

g .:. >.

g CII

C21 o py pTA O til C11 ASH f RT ASH o RT 7  ;

Tf1 C1 ' T RIS-A  !

' T IE.

Cl I RIS -A i RIs B MIS-B ')

a

' f.!LC. RIS-C  !

3.9 RIS-C C2 y CI' >

fA -

C21 f

. .C21 JX -

p74 _ 7X

, _ gTA ASH ASH C21 C21 1

~--

dg T '

d R,,G, I

f* DELETEDWIRES TO BE (

Itc C sal (2) I FA RC C 5 A3(4)

.ffB)- C4-C4C I o='C 4Cp. C ,0 f9 I f---O--i ovoC ovo,C

[ REFLECTS REvtsloN REQUIRED To DWG.E-G08,5H.14D (ELEM.oNLY)]

i Slida 5b '

l 4

L -

e .

e l

l l

l G7[l@: DARATIONf0F SENSOR OMNNEL [kPf10NS (IED PREFERRED OFTION) b/ANTAGES o

ASSURES THAT SFAS IS.I>ttNE TO A. SINGLE FAILURE Wi!CH COULD AFFECT TWO SENSOR CHANNELS.

o DOES NOT PMKE SFAS MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TO SPLRIOUS TRIPS OR ECUIPPENT IW%GE. ,

o REQUIRES'NC FIELD WIRING O WiGES.

DisAwANrAses - -

o REGUIRES VERY.#BITIQUS SCHEDULE TO ALLOW INSTALLATION PRIOR TO PUWT RESTART.

Slide 6 e

e b

, we*.v-=w w - e , ,A.-e p ,- . -e e - w&- ,- #g rs , v t**yra +<y.. 4 y

1 l

l SFAS- AS PROPOSED CH: CH2 XMTR CHANNELI XMTR CH NNEL 2

~

. SENSOR SENSOR O' 1.O GIC TO LOGIC +- CHAN E TO LOGIC

  • CHANNEL CH 1,2,3,4 CH I,2,3,4 ANO CE CH3 CH4 XMTR XMTR
  • Sm LOGIC S NSOR

-X R LOGC TO LOGIC- TO LOGIC +-

CH 1,2,3,4 CH 1,2,3,4 3 4

  • SENSOR POWER SUPPLY ISOLATED FROM LOGIC POWER SUPPLY

~ ' SENSOR CHANNEL OPTICALLY ISOLATED FROM LOGIC CHANNEL Slide 6a 8

.-?__..___. - . . . ~ . - . . - - - . - - - - - - . - , - ~ , - - .

SFAS MOOlFICATION-SEPERATION OF SENSOR COMMON 1

SENSCR gjg, -

  • XWR l

PCMR ggg suPPUEs BISTABLE PS i

-t5 R 0 0 Q.

_SE_N __

g 7 7 Q[ _ _

ACTUATION m i.,

ll8 M C $l $$$

Yl(Y2) Sanom oneen

. u o o, ,.$EEs l - 24 OUTPUT LOGIC

, POWER -

SUPPLIES 1

([

l l l l COMMON OUTPUT 1- TO A N TED a

_ RELAY T ' OEVICE

% f; .

.i j

SFAS CHANfEL i(2) LEGD O I 5FROM SENSOR CS= SENSOR COMMON POWER SUPPLY (CHISCH3 ISOLATEDFROM COMMON (CL) CH l CL AND FROM EACH OTMF CL = LOGIC COMMON OI

  • OPTICAL ISOLATION a RI= RELAY ISOLATION SENSOR I/I POMR -
  • Mr XMTR suPPUEa iso 81 STABLE ps

.7 0 0 0 0 A

. SENSOR I I I I I ~~~

ACTUATION [

F LPe="?4.

7 8"*" a s i il8 H C

, Y3 (Y4) ~

L7,pg"g y o y 9 .

OUTPUT LOGIC SNikS 4 CUTPUT .L. TO ACTUATED i i l l COMMON '

RELAY T. DEVICE 1l i

! SFAS CHANNEL 3(4) t FROM SENSOR POWER f SUPPLY CH 3 i

[

Slida 6b

. Enclosure 2

~

November 26,1985 TOLEDO EDISON /NRC MEETING SFAS 6

ATTENDEES NAME ORGANIZATION ALBERT W. DEAGAZIO NRC SUSHIL C. JAIN TED

~

CONRAD MCCRACKEN NRC/PDB 6 JACK R. GRIGG BETA DALE R. WUOKKO TED/NLD GEORGE GARRITY CONSOLIDATED CONTROLS CORP.

CHRIS K HN TED/I&C ENGR.

GEORGE DICK NRR/PD 6 4

RICK KENDALL NRR/PEICSB OLAN PARR , NRR/PEICSB LARRY STALTER TED

!- BOB PETERS . TED/NLD l

l l

l e

. - , - . - . _ , ,, , - . - - . ~ -- . - . . - - . - - -- - - -- --- - - - - - - - --

. 0 MEETING

SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION Licensee: Toledo Edison Company

  • Copies also sent to those people on service (cc) list for subject plant (s).

Docket File NRC PDR L PDR PBD-6 Rdg JPartlow (Emergency Preparedness only)

JStolz ADe Agazio OELD EJordan BGrimes ACRS-1.0 _

NRC Participants I CMcCracken .

GDick j RKendall ,

) OParr' ,

l 9

9

~ ~

m-- . .- . - _~ - - - - . . , ~ . . - . -