ML20092M168
| ML20092M168 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000172 |
| Issue date: | 02/02/1971 |
| From: | Dewar M LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORP. |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20092L085 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-91-233 NUDOCS 9202270187 | |
| Download: ML20092M168 (5) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - __ _ _ ,. ., ff , . ,. e i
'Nobj'Et**
,' ' f .'
q y &, fQ) g LOCI (Ill:Im G1:OHOI A COMi*ANY p g,s,g m' J e'9 .............o................... M A nit.TT A ronotA sooe.o suweyp .m y L > 9- 6 ., . , . p 2 February 1971 s e- t Q}g / g, u.s . . .> United States Atomic Energy Ccanission Division of Reactor Licensing Washington, D. C. 20545
Subject:
Radiation Effects Reactor, Docket 50-172 Gentlemen 1.ockheed-Georgia Company is in the process of preparing plans for de-comissioning the Radiation Effects Reactor, and has encountered certain unique problems because of the uniqueness of the facility. One nroblem is the fact that a considerable amount of relatively los level acti'ation has occurred in various items of equirnent and structures. We have been unable to determine where a situation such as this is addressed in the Code of Federal Regulations, and hence we would like an opinion from the Comission on the proposed criteria listed in the following pt.ragraphs. Guidelines for DecontamJnation_ pf, Pacilities and Friu15 ment. Prior _ g Eelease for Unrestricted Use or Temination of Licenses for Dyproduct; Source. or Srectal y,uelear Vaterial which was published by the Division of Materials Licensing on April 22, 1970, appears to be a reasonable standard fcr release of non-activated components from the reactor facility.
-Purthermore, se understand that Guidelinen has already been used as a de-contamination standard in several reactor decomissioning programs including Hallam and Piqua. Lockheed requests the Division of Reactor Licensing to confim to lockheed that the above ,0,,pidelines -- two copies of which are attached -- is acceptsble as a decontamination standard
. daring decomissioning of the RER.
With regard to activated equipcent and structures, lockheed proposes to release from control all items which meet the amearable contamination standard in the above _0aidelines and which have residual radiation levels of less than 0.2 mrad /hr at i cm when measured in accordance with the above Guidelines. Lockheed-would like confintation of Comission's acceptance of these criteria for release of activated structures and equi; rent. e
'b ',
n o '! ' n 3 Q r1 I ,q-g 2k [10725 s. 531 suceue m 233 ,,,
2 If the Corrrnission does not concur with one or both of the above suggested approvals by Lockheed, we wish to be so advised, and would appreciate guidance as to a solution which would be noceptable to the Ocamiission. Very truly yours, 14CyEIED-GEORGIA COWFA!4
% Y@' %
M. A. Dewar, Scient1*'t Dept. 7214, Zone 401 t'ADidh
4 , u_.n- -_. __________________, e.w % e,m m.ui.M~eb_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
;H;.". : me
.f ,. ... . ..,
s
',;.r; g: yne M.E ,,
- t
. y 4. , *
. ,, Lg..;.6 U q---
s & i. . q < s _/ . .' .8. . v * -
*%do hjI.YDY"I '
- 3 . . . .
, . i=. .', y *, k . , . . . E ,,
( The thstructions in this guide in conjunction with Tables I and II
- cpoef fy the in$1oactivity smd rhiintion exposure rate litato which '
should be used in neconflithiric the decontnmination rmd survey of curaces of premises amd equipment prior to abandonment or relencei '- for unrectricted use. Tne limits in Tcbles I and II do not apply , 4 to premiceo, equipm nt, or nerap containing induced radionetivity l for which the radiolocierd considerations pertirient to their ur e 1
- .ny be di fferent. The telence of such facilities or items from
/ regulntory control vill be considered on a ense-by.chse basis.
- 1. The licensee thtd1 take a renconnble effort to eliminate recidura conttent nnti on.
e
- 2. Radioactivity on equipment or r.urfaces t. hall not be covered by paint, pintinC, or other coverir.g enterita unless con-treninstion levels, no determined by a survey and documented, - .
,,,, are below the limits specified in Tables I or '21 prior to j,','. 7, /. . -
applying the covertric. A reatonnbic effort stuot be made to ' minimize the contrmination prior to uce of any covering. - 3 The radionctivjty on the interior curfacco of pipes, drain . lines, or ductvork chral be determined by making mencuremento g ,; at (d1 trnpo, rmd other t.ppropriate nececo points, provided that contretination at these locations is. likely to be repre-4
! centative of contt.:-Jnation on the interior of the pipes, drain
.' Curfnces of premises, equip: ent, or cernp lines, or duciverk.
vhich are likely to be conta:dnnted but are of cuch site, +
,j construction, or location ns to ranke the curface inaccecrible '
, for purpoces of censurement chtal be presumed to be contra:Linnted N in exceso of the limits. '
- h. U.cn requect, the Commiccion any nuthorize a licencee to relinquich paccercien or centrol of premisec, equipment, or cerop having curfnre; conttminnted with materinin in exccan of the limite
. speci fied . Thic eny include, but vould not be limited to,. epecial
.' e j re t.n. , t hn r e ::u zh en rn::f rg of buildinre, transfer of premisec in another orcani ntion continuing vork vith radioactive enterinir, or cenvercion of facilities to n long-term storage or standby cintus. Such requests tuot:
- n. provide deinjicd, crecific infermation describing the premicen, j cc,uipent e r ce rap, rt.dlotetive contesinnnts, and the nature, i i cxtent, nnd decree of recidual surface contreninntion, f
- b. Provide n detailed herd th and cc.fety ant 0yrin which reflects l; that the residur1 t=ounts of tuteritdo on curface nrenc, 4
, tecether with other conciderntiens cuch ac prospective use .,
of the premice: , equigent er cerep, are unlikely to result
; in t.n unrecccaLM c rirk to the Lenith and refety of the public.
4
#
- e s 4% 4 - g ( y. # '
D -- ,
'/.,
g e s "' % , ) 'A * ,, [+ 8_
~
y 5.31%. . .,
~ -
;;,-{ 3 .g 3
* .s u .sm~ . . .
- __ m .,- 3' s : a.Ty;~,~~y
;. ' , eL g ,8 ' y e<fi.lj,s's 4,1 * .
. ~
ex!r
. . r v, . . , f, . . . ; . ' ~ .~ *; -
t ,- ;.p.,y lc,y -;- a .- - . %. ,s .- . .m . y. . . ;_ g i.\ .
. ': (, , 4' W .Af; , . ( .. , . ~ :T!s;.
l .
*f $. Prior to relence of premiceu for unrestricted use, the licensee chall' b'
; nahe a comprehensive radiation survey which establiches that contan- ,.
; inntion is within the limits specified in Tableo I or II. A copy of '
the. curvey report shall be filed with the Director, Division of lutorie.le Licensinc, LCAEC, k'achington, D.. C. 00$5, and also the - - Director of the Regional Division of Complinnee Office having
- jurisdiction. The report chould be filed at least 30 days prior to !
the pinnned date of abc.ndore:.ent. The curvey report challs t g a. Identify the premises. . i
- b. Shov that rent.onnble effort has been cade to elir.inate residual i
. contreir.aticn. '
- c. DecerJbe the ocope of the cervey nnd coacral procedurce followed.
,. d. Stute the findinds of the uurvey in units Dyecifjed in the 9
. instruction. 4 .. 1 ,+ ,
s ~ < - Following review of the report, the AEC will consider vicitin6 the fa:111 tics to confir:s the curvey. - 1 .
+ *
, a . , *
- i
. . . 4 f t g N .. S l
s, '
.3 t
1 . . 1 , .. , 1 i 4 f f 4
~)
j .*
, e
, c go '.~ *4 * '; + &a F f. .* - =. *
- gy ' p .y ys **A.
i' a. g ,, ; { ; . ; .; 7.i' , ,
- ::. . 6:..L_g3. *.:
s
.i; 9;&;
+
- - - ' e .
,.s . . . , , s g ,: u- .
i,-Pr-- --p ,,-wan.r y g -~,,g .,w3,%,. - .,- ,- ge.,w-,....,7 -,,.---.,m,--.. n .-,-p.-=.. - . - , - , - + - - , - - , , - - , - . - - - , ~ - , - w-- ---y--- -r,---w-
,ii!' t j .t'ie !f; ! !
;U[gl9Pkbhq{:.![ jh* ,' p f
j
.ii*
7 .' 23
! .l: t
,j c - = ,.h
,I i-4 i c-e hp ,d :; .
,f er ne ;- -
.b c. t i
( 0 0
. ., ;. g v' -
- 0 ~ *' . 1; Ir ,.I
#3kc
, +.
) 7
/v- p c et rnen t - r e
. D '* y:/. .
- 3
( /c
/
c t al .* r . ,s b a aul e . s -
~
.T. ~ . . e: s E S I o a ob .
L E
=p p p r he f
l o r t =ae l e -
~
0 A V d 0 d 0 ' d 0
/l db aa ,
d h e
'; e e af i
rr h aaeh t e h ed t f o t 0 0 0 rT s gtrn
. 2 ~
0, 1 0, = i t t n a - s
. . d T r l ae i gg t 1 1 e b cm pnn , c -
. I 4. d a iii y e
.. -. I 0n t ee wsnl j u s vt sil b E -
n e ia yema o L ) ad t r b srn - c seo r E 2 2 2 5 he s - A = m m m ( t s t at dati o . cn T c c c c = m a i c et F - c c se m i u edd r 0 0 0 0 sl i d o i n e 0 0 0 0 I 1 ce l ac canp .
.. 1 1 1 1 I r r r ,I o sr
) / / t t e d e r -
3
/.
/. - a o a a ee h yc t e p e
~ ( rb t ba er . . t cp p cp e d u yd r e L
A ) p ) ) h r h r wdl , nr sce e m - i 6 d d 6 d d 6 / ( d
/
su s t oo it esnc b eeu b r e d w (e, e 0 s 0 0 0 (d0 0 u 0
= 0 e a g
- a. a r
go nc s i sc se .- l pce rid o s r a
- r.
u sr 0, u. i 0, r e' 3 - 5, c u r i x 'it n l ir b u e 5 r e i x 2 r e 2 i 0 dl aa e meo edi eef htf e a s g - v 5u 2 v a v v ei s e t saeb l a
, A M. A M A 0E1 rr c r f ea ot t acnl r
t 0 1 ,.
) i
'ji ji jj J4g f[ j.{1 t o an ed wl o .
2 a t eie rcoa t n 1 (S L
)
2 m c 2 m c m c - g , n i e s - t rm apu ror a=ks ef nh f o h a t E 4 0 - r rt cof s V ( 0 0 0 ah g eps a ol r e E 0 0 1 t/ n h pn f n e e r . L ) 1 1 / ed i t ai rot v t r 3 / y ba t uiuc e e -
'snahn e l
e . N ( o /e e r t st cI m e O E lm i a= i I L p p p l =
- y
. a ey t f cut oirn t
n rM e vn T B a8 l cbh l t e e o
~
A, A d d d f0 nt t psn c h
; V mpni d c 0 i - n .)di i
n 0 t D 0 0 0 0 0
,r e - e nd eew t v cait r
e r eu ge A R 0, 1 0, ee gn urd 0h ee S a i.
-. I 1 1 lp v e ap i st nee 0ht p 1t a u
q rh ec , t C E : g t e mba ie e va L an ed r oi c rhrh et pt r ae . E B .
) . zi b n i eeo. pi o e er
,~- C A -
5 (
, cd - wr , p b a a .
A T 2 2 d pt s F m = m rer ny us l pa f s t R c c c orh al ,sna ad pe
- v. U F / p ni i nar = od S
)
0 0 1 0 0 1 1 t md ua
.mr ap ha p
io=r t ro s t ra e n r a e. a n r g nev lt 3 / / a die ll aet ae t i l e a ( a e ex al rpc c ph a l e-a L r sa2 a g atf l hd L A 1
=
p p h
/ u=0 hh t s esf t t e pi r v wus i
m s e _
. 0 d d d ee o nnc i t t ne 7 t *-
n
- 1 a bh n bs e
i ui sor cepr
- 0 0 .
r t a a1 0 0 m y h yp ict abi e n n1 0, 0, aft bo d c orvs a i - m4 ( hc e= 4 ni t io s h
. 0 1 s no os d s ee abhl t a- - .
1 0 It s at eg e t n I ue e bl ii t ag p d g nd rat et no . f r o o-c:
- y l ;s bd a nn i i
,in ct a lf o bo se d m
'l e r
t s a c o
- n o
aew Ts mt at i c b e , aslt v p aci t o ay t n c ey s i) u c. ti ary oriev n o u db issn r r nn oc t rc on morj e t e d ( eso oea sce i ebe hg h
, o hr dii br c rrt ob f t 3d r con o soa s I e i ea u o
)
3 np 2 a i hni rccs e i dv el a e c h yc t bi f t cnl ol ol o r s-
.. 2
(
,a y wes t yaf I u boe a-f g ndt f i e tf vnh a h t
t nr r U is t ah n en E 2 c ssi icps ach r - i ee n i os
- P ,3 e esf mel u- T t ua di ,
uyt i oret e d e m ee O 52d pi ed ao I st T 3 - os s e r g e emd =dh ac 'r rc O 2hd t eu ahnn cn eb srn a ona u ua S I U ,t Te sae o o =t aa Mii tbd r cd ueu t o hiif etd nr s a sf ar _ e eu
,ti t ac a ih n rl t pa p=wti hn ot
- srp iai rTv Ean ser Ad g hiaau Twrt s M M r.
a r o. ean o aees n- e h t ph ect r
)
1
)
2
)
3 h) o" s"
. n )5 h c t yp ;
( ( ( ( . ( (
^
UTa obs Bt oo
' - [' , .
?' . . . - X
' s ' ,
D,MjQ ,O 9 ). i1 7 - ./{ 8 1i'
* ;' , jj ,{l , 'j ,.4 < i ' ! ll
S , . . . ~. _ . . . . . - . . ) V C) LOCli1i1:1:Ib GI:01tGI A COM l' Ale Y l
. e, . .. ,o = e, 5 or . e i o . ..c . . . i c .. . . ...
p [ g 0 6/g , M Anitn A, otoHoi A soooo
; (g , j}
-Ql h89,tu. tgg wp 9 p 22 February 1971 #
MDOO4537 United States Atomic Energy Comission Division of Reactor Licensing Washington, D. C. , 20545
Subject:
Decomissioning RER, Docket No. 50-172 ReWawy Ne Cy. Gentlemen: We have been advised that representatives of the Atccie Energy Comission and of the State of Georgia conferred on February 11, 1971, en the subject of the decomissioning of the Radiation Effects Reactor (RER), and that the plan described below represents a method by which Lockheed may plan the RER decomissioning in a manner acceptable both to the Atomic Energy Comission and to the State of Georgia. The Atomic Energy Comission's recomendations were discussed in two telephone conversations between Roger Roodruff of the Division of Reactor Licensing and M. A. Dewar of Lockheed on February 11 and 12, 1971. As lockheed understands, a decomissioning plan is to be sub-mitted tha'c will include the-following elements: 1 A statement that Lockheed has disposed of, or will dispose of, all the reactor fuel by authorized means prior to submitting a request for termination of Pacility License R-86,
- 2. The means by which lockheed will dispose of all control rod drive mechanisms.
3 The final status of each remaining component of the reactor at the time a request is submitted for termination of Pacility License R-66. vw
& k/
#o0h /cs,
'iWp'g'g e, ,
- &g
( c'. s sn - g.
r'-- t[ LGD/304537- 22 F(b mary 1971 4 A general discussion of plans for final disposition of reactor components and other radioactive material at the reactor facility. Lockheed is proceeding with preparation of the decommissioning plan based on the above guidelines, and expects to submit its plan to the Atomic Energy Comission and the State of Georgis ret an early date. Lockheed also recognizes that tennination of Pacility License R-86 must occur
- Houltaneously with issuance of an appropriate State of Georgia by-prod act material license; hence Lockheed will keep the State of Georgia fully informed on the progress of the decomissioning activities, and will coordinate closely with the State of Georgia on plans for competion of faci.tity clean-up under the decomissioning byproduct materials license.
Very truly yours, IDCKHEED-GEORGIA COMPANY
,\
M. A. Dewer D/72-14, Zone 401 L MADidh b 6_. . ._._ . . . . . . .
) ,
r,
- _
i
-. o
,g UNITED STATES- BTJ6s AtJ%RITY Fil.E COPT ^
#.r D" O g ^Mh['
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON D.C, 20$45
, *Ib
~
} /h N* 4 fy i
March 1, 1971 j Docket No. 50-172
. l' t
- Lockheed Aircraft Corporation , s AITN Mr. H. L. Poore
- Vice President Marietca, Georgia 30060 Gentlemen By letters dated August 14, 1970 and January 29, 1971, you applied for an amend-ment to License No. R-86 for the Radiation Ef fects Reactor (RER) and a change to the Technial Specifications appended to the license. The proposed amendment, which we have designated as Amendment No.10, would permit Lockheed to own but not operate RER; and the propoed change, which we have designated as Change No. 8, would reduce the surveillance and staffing requirements for the RER to levels appropriate for possession-only status.
We have evaluated the proposed status of the reactor and its components, and the adequacy of the proposed Technical Specifications that require facility
' surveillance and epecify staffing requirements. During our review, we informed-
.r staf f that ce, tain modifications to the Technical Specifications were essary to meet our regulatory requirements. Your staff indicated that these ifications were acceptable.
A conclude that the amendment does not present significant hazards considera-ci as not described or implicit in the safety analysis report and that there is
.asonable assurance that the health and safety of the.public vill not be endangered. Accordingly, License No. R-86 and the Technical Specifications (Change No. 8) appended thereto are revised in their entirety to authorize you to possess, but not to operate, the Radiation Ef fects Reactor.
A copy of -the amended license and a copy of the Federal Register. Notice are enclosed. Sincerely, 4 h AM' Donald J.VSkovholt
, k I Assistant Director for Reactor Operations Division of Reactor Licensing
Enclosures:
- 1. Amendment No. 10 I - - including Change No. 8 r
- 2. Federal Register Notice .
I 1 J l L q p,/ c '- f ~
--t -NC~ - - * + - - - - ' ' *py p *w--* m v
- rwy s-w-y
, ' . v.
3' . - . . - . . . Q) ..
* /.J.
- UNITED STATES
( - e .* . ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION N* ' WASHINGTON. O C. 20M e d her 14CYJiEED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION DOCKET NO. 50-172 AMENDED FACILITY LtCENSE Amendment No. 10 ticense No. R-86
- 1. The Atomic Energy Commission ("the Commission") has found that:
A. The application for amendment dated August 14, 1970, and supplement dated January 29, 1971, comply with the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, ss an.nded ("the Act"), and the Commission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. There is reasonable assurance that the reactor facility can be possessed in the described condition at the location designated in the application without endangering the health and safety of the public; C. Lockheed is technically and financially qualified to engage in the activities authorized by the amended license in accordance with the Commission's regulations; D. Lockheed has furnished proof of financial protection which satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR Part 140; and E. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
- 2. Accordingly, Facility License No R-86 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
A. This license applies to the Radiation Effects Reactor (RER), a heterogeneous pressurized water-type nuclear reactor (hereinsfter "the reactor") possessed by Lockheed Aircraf t Corporation located in Dawsonville, Georgia, and is described in lockheed's application for license dated February 23, 1962, and amendments thereto includ-i ing application dated August 14, 1970, and supplement dated January 29,1971 (herein "the application") . I 3. Subject to the conditions and requirements incorporated herein, .the
! Commission hereby licenses Lockheed Aircraft Corporation:
i A. Pursuant to Section 104c of the Act and 10 CFR Chapter I, Part 50, g .
" Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities", to
_,/
'43 0 -
hOu ow-W 3i( v ,-
.. . _ _ _ _ _ . . - . _ . - ._ ~ -- . _ _ - . - . _ .
s <-
- n. <
(,.a .
,_ , _- ~ -~m s-.
~ 2-a I posseFS, but not to operate, the reactor as a utilization facilityi Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Chapter I Part 70, "Special Nuclear B.
}bterial", to possess and store up to 18.8 kilograms of contained uranium;
.o C. Pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Chapter I, Part 30 " Licensing of Byproduct Material" to possess, but not to separate such byproduct material as may have been produced by operation of the reactor.-
4.- This license shall be deemed to contain and be subject to the conditions specified in Part 20,.Section 30.34 of Part 30, Section 50.54 and 50.59 of Part 50, and Section 70.32 of Part 70,10 CFR Chapter I and to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations and orders of the Commission now or hereaf ter in ef fect, and-to the additional conditions specified below: A. Lockheed shall : t reactivate the facility without prior approval of the Commission. B. Lockheed shall not dispose of the f acility or the property occupied by the facility without prior approval of the Commission. C. Records In addition to the records heretofore required under this license and by -applicable AEC regulations, including Section 20.401 of 10 CFR Part 20 Lockheed shall keep the following:
- 1. . Records of inspection of the deactivated f acility, including
-- the results of surveys .of radioactivity levels; and
- 2. Records showing radioactivity released or discharged into the air or water beyond'the effective control of Lockheed as measured at or prior to:the point of such release or discharge.
I :D. Reports I' In addition to those raports required by applicable AEC regulations, l Lockheed shall submit _ the f ollowing: 1 o 1 .. i (.,I i
, , , , - , - - - - , , - rw--*- Y -~
"w - w--- - ~ * ~ - 'v * <- w er-~- w ~~ ~ ~ = - m-p e**-~
- e. - ,
3-1 1. A report of any indication or occurrence of a possible i unsafe condition relating to the facility or to the public. For each occurrence, Lockheed shall promptly notify by I telephone or telegraph the Director of the appropriate AEC Regional Compliance Of fice listed in Appendix D of 10 CFR Part 20, and shall submit within 10 days a report in writing to the Director, Division of Reactor Licensing, with a copy i to the Regional Compliance Office.
- 2. An annual report to the Director, Division of Reactor Licensing, of the status of the deactivated f acility including the results of the surveys of radioactivity levels and the status of the special nuclear and byproduct materials stored on the Lockheed
, Aircraft reactor f acility site. The first report shall be filed six months af ter issuance of this amended f acility license and once a year thereaf ter until such time as Lockheed files with the Commission's Division of Reactor Licensing its plan for dismantling of the facility, pursuant to Section 50.82-of 10 CFR Part 50, and receives Commission approval thereof.
E. Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A to this license (hereinaf ter "the Technical Specifications") (designated as Change No. 8) are hereby incorporated in this license. No changes shall be made in the Technical Specifications except as otherwise permit-ted by this license, by the Act and by the Commission's rules and regulations, except that Lockheed may dispose of component parts or devices from the facility in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR Part 20. This facility license, as amended, is ef fective as of the date of issuance and shall expire at midnight, April 4,1974 FOR THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION EY , f*v Donald . Skovholt
-Assistant Director for Reactor Operations Division of Reactor Licensing
Enclosure:
1 {) Appendix A (Change Technical Specifications) No. 8 to the
l'
, ,, s.
4 s "^ UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION _ DOCKET No.'50-172 LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION i NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF AMENDED FACILITY LICENSE I The Atomic Energy Commission ("the Commission") has issued, ef fective as of the dare of issuance, Amendment No. 10 to Facility License No. R-86 dated July 20, 1962. The f acility license as previously issued authorized Lockheed to possess and operate a heterogeneous pressurized water-type nuclear reactor
'in Dawson County, Georgia. The amendment authorizes Lockheed to possess, but not to operate, the deactivated f acility and incorporates revised Technical _ Specifications in the amended license.
The Radiation Ef fects Reactor has been shutdown and further operation is not planned. The fuel has been unloaded and is stored in the storage pool in authorized criticality-safe containers. Radiation monitoring of the f acility will be maintained. The Lockheed Aircraf t Corporation will submit to the
-t Division of Reactor Licensing a plan for dismantling of the reactor.
The Commission has found that the application for the amendment complies with the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended ("the Act"), and the Commission's regulations published in 10 CFR Chapter I. The Commission has made the findings -equired by the Act and the Commission's regulations I which are set forth in the amendment, and has concluded that the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common def ense and security or to the l-t
, ,3 - L,2 h
- g l
o g
> o,, .
4 ([t , ( 2 health and safety of the public. The Commission has also found that prior I-public notice of this amended license is not required since the amendment I significant hazards considerations different from those does not present previou.ily evaluated, i Within fifteen days from the date of publication of this notice in the FEDERAL RIGISTER, the applicant may file a request for a hearing, and any person whose interest may be af fected by the issuancu of this amended license may file a petition for leave to intervene. Requests for a hearing and_ petitions to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the provisions If a request for of the Commission's " Rules of practice", 10 CFR part 2. i a hearing or a petition for leave to intetvene is filed within the time prescribed in this notice, che Commission vill issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order.-
! For further details with respect to this anended f acility license, see (1) the application dated August 14, 1970, and supplement dated January 29, 1971, and (2) the amended f acility license, all of which are available- f or public W.,
inspection in the Commission's hblic Document Room, 1717 H Street, N. Washington, D. C. Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 1st day of March, 1971. FOR THE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION eufr sLA u.
- Donald J. Skovholt Assistant Director l for Reactor Operations Division of Reactor Licensing Q,
t l ..
, --- m _ * --}}