ML20101A561

Jm Farley Nuclear Plant 1991 Annual Environ Operating Rept (Nonradiological)

ML20101A561
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	12/31/1991
From:	Woodard J SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9204290043
Download: ML20101A561 (3)

Text

f .

huhrn %cear Opetsting Company Pos.1 ()"ce ibs 1295 oanergham. Atabama 35?01 ieeriene M5 668 5066 n

J. o.

• Voodard Southern Nudear Operating Company Vcc ?'es

• nt pv sewinun vc7n ; ystem Fane< Prowet April 22, 1992 1

l l

l Docket Hos. 50-348 50-364 l

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Joseph H. Farley Nuclear Plant _

1991 Annual Environmental Oneratino Report (Ncnradioloaicall Gentlemtn:

Enclosed in accordance witn Subsection 5.4.1 of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan (Units 1 & 2), Appendix B to facility ,0perating License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8, is the report sunnarizhig implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan during the calendar year 1991.

If you have any questions, please advise.

Respectfully submitted,

,k

'J . . bI\

3 Woodard i

i dt ii

_ p, n H re cc: Mr. S. D. Ebneter Hr. S. T. Hoffman Mr. G. F. Maxwell

., o c. < . <,

i 920429004b $31 PDR ADOCK .%dC348 R PDR

'\

d a SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 NRC DOCKET N05. 50-348 AND 50 364 i

-FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF 8 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1991 (NONRA010 LOGICAL) 1.

L I

L u

i

JOSEPH H. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1991 (NONRAD10 LOGICAL)

INTRODUCTION in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Environmental Protection Plan (Units 1 and 2), Appendix B to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-2 and NPT-8, this report is submitted sunnarizing implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan for the calendar year 1991.

REPORTING RE0VIRG Dil5 The following is submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan:

A. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN (EPP) NONCOMPLIANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS There were no EPP noncompliances during 1991.

B. CHANGES IN STATION DESIGN OR OPERATION, TESTS, AND EXPERlHENTS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EPP SUBSECTION 3.1 WHICH INVOLVED A POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE There were no changes in station design or operation, tests, or experiments which involved a potentially significant unreviewed environmental issue.

C. NONROUTINE REPORTS SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EPP SUBSECTION 5.4.2 There were no nonroutine reports submitted during 1991.

-.. _ _ - . .-. .. ..