ML20040C295
| ML20040C295 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 01/12/1982 |
| From: | Hulse R ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20040C285 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8201270496 | |
| Download: ML20040C295 (44) | |
Text
-- -
l 9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ARIZONA )
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, )
et al. ) Docket Nos. STN 50-528
) STN 50-529 (Palo Verde Nuclear Generating) STN 50-530 Station, Units 1, 2 and 3) )
)
AFFIDAVIT OF RUSSELL D. HULSE ON CONTENTION NO. 5 STATE OF ARIZONA )
) ss.
County of Maricopa )
I, Russell D. Hulse, being duly sworn, upon my oath state as follows:
- 1. I am Vice President of Resources Planning for Arizona Public Service Company, 411 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. My resume is set forth in Attachment RDH-1 (attached).
- 2. In such capacity I am responsible for (a) the planning of genera. tion and transmission facilities, (b) the development of fuel supplies, (c) the negotiation of power contracts with other utilities, and (d) the monitoring of water development activities.
- 3. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station
("PVNGS") Unit 1 is scheduled for commercial operation in May, 1983; PVNGS Unit 2 is scheduled for commercial opera-O!hhoshg PDR 1 i
tion in May, 1984; and PVNGS Unit 3 is scheduled for commer-cial operation in May, 1986.
- 4. The primary source of cooling water for PVNGS will be sewage effluent from the City of Phoenix 91st Avenue Sewage Treatment Plant ("91st Avenue Plant").
- 5. The secondary source of cooling water for PVNGS will be sewage effluent from the City of Tolleson wastewater treatment plant ("Tclleson Plant").
- 6. Sewage effluent from the 91st Avenue Plant and the Tolleson Plant will be conveyed to PVNGS via a 36.5-mile underground pipeline (" Effluent Pipeline") from the 91st Avenue Plant.
- 7. Effluent from the 91st Avenue Plant will be obtained for PVNGS pursuant to " Agreement No. 13904, Option and Purchase of Effluent," dated April 23, 1973, among the Cities of Phoenix, Glendale, Mesa, Scottsdale, Tempe and the Town of Youngtown, Arizona Public Service Company ("APS")
and Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District ("SRP") (" Agreement No. 13904").
- 8. Pursuant to Agreement No. 13904, APS and SRP may take up to 140,000 acre-feet per year from the 91st Ave-nue Plant and the 23rd Avenue Sewage Treatment Plant ("23rd Avenue Plant"), subject to the availability of such amounts after satisfaction of prior commitments.
- 9. APS and SRP have dedicated to the operation of PVNGS as much of their entitlement under Agreement No.
13904 as is required for such operation.
i
- 10. Since issuance of the construction permits for PVNGS in 1976, projections of sewage effluent production at the 91st Avenue Plant and the 23rd Avenue Plant have been made independently by (a) the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
("COE") and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (" EPA")
for the Maricopa Association of Governments and (b) the City of Phoenix Water and Sewage Department.
- 11. The COE-EPA estimates were prepared in 1979 and are set forth in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Maricopa Association of Governments Point Source Metro Phoenix 208 Wastewater Management Plan, Appendix C (July 1979).
- 12. The City of Phoenix prepared effluent projec-tions in 1979 and 1981.
- 13. The City of Phoenix' 1979 estimates were pro-vided to APS in a letter from Robert B. Steytler of the City of Phoenix Wastewater Operations to Terry Hudgins of APS, dated September 20, 1979.
- 14. The City of Phoenix' 1981 estimates were pro-vided to APS in a chart entitled " Flow Projection Compari-son," dated August 26, 1981, attached hereto as Attachment RDH-2. From this chart projected quantities of effluent dis-charged from the 91st Avenue Plant, which would consist of the sum of estimates for Phoenix, Scottsdale, Glendale, Tempe, Mesa and Youngtown, are as follows:
1
1981 projections in acre-feet ("AF")
1985 1990 1995 2000 143,470 AF' 177,590 AF 211,800.AF 247,740 AF
- 15. For purposes of determining whether the quan-tities of effluent to be discharged from the 91st Avenue Plant will be adequate to supply cooling water for PVNGS, the COE-EPA projections are the most conservative.
- 16. The existing commitments for effluent dis-charged from the 91st Avenue Plant are:
Buckeye Irrigation District (" BID") 30,000 AF/ year Arizona Department of Game and Fish
("ADGF") 7,300 AF/ year Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 140,000 AF/ year
- 17. A prior commitment of 1,200 acre-feet per-year to the U. S . Water Conservation Laboratory ("WCL") has not been used since 1978 when the laboratory's research fa-cilities at Flushing Meadows were washed out by flood waters. WCL has since moved its facilities and is nc longer taking any effluent from the 91st Avenue Plant.
- 18. Monthly estimates corresponding to the COE-EPA estimates are set forth in Exhibit C - Effluent Flow Projections, Greeley and Hansen, January, 1980, of the City of Phoenix 23rd and 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plants Draft Residuals Management Facility Plan, Volume 5-Phase C Effluent Discharge Assessment, August, 1980, by Arthur Beard
Engineers, Inc., and Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. ("Greeley and Hansen").
- 19. Based on the monthly estimates set forth in Greeley and Hansen, and on the COE-EPA estimates for subse-quent years, in each month during the five-year period of May, 1986, to April, 1991, other than June,1986, the esti-mated amount of effluent available at the 91st Avenue Plant for use at PVNGS is greater than the amount required to op-erate all three Palo Verde units at 95's capacity factors during each such month.
- 20. As set forth in Tables C-1 and C-2 of Greeley and Hansen, in June, 1986, the estimated amount of effluent available at the 91st Avenue Plant for use at PVNGS is 0.6 million gallons per day ("MGD") or 56 acre-feet less than will be required to operate all three Palo Verde units at 95% capacity factors during said month.
- 21. On June 12, 1981, the City of Tolleson, APS and SRP entered into an " Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of Wastewater Effluent" ("Tolleson Agreement"), pursuant to which APS and SRP shall purchase and accept (a) all of the sewage effluent produced through the operation of the waste-water treatment plant ("Tolleson Plant") owned by the City of Tolleson in excess of the sum of 2.0 MGD (i.e., 186 acre-feet per month) committed for the production of sod adjacent to the Tolleson Plant (" Committed Effluent") and 10% of the amount of effluent in excess of the 2.0 MGD reserved by Tolleson (" Reserved Effluent") and (b) any counts of the Committed Effluent not actre.lly sold, and of the Reserved Effluent not actually used or otherwise disposed of by Tolleson, but not to exceed 8.3 MGD (i.e. 9,300 acre-feet per year).
- 22. APS and SRP have dedicated their entitlement under the Tolleson Agreement to the operation of PVNGS.
- 23. Based on information provided by the City of Tolleson, the projected output of the Tolleson Plant in 1986 is approximately 8,400 acre-feet, or 700 acre-feet per month (average).
- 24. The estimated average monthly quantity of ef-fluent to be processed during 1986 at the Tolleson Plant, less the Committed Effluent and Reserved Effluent, would more than offset the 56 acre-feet shortage at PVNGS pro-jected for June, 1986, from the data provided in Greeley and Hansen.
- 25. Under the terms of both Agreement No.13904 and the Tolleson Agreement, APS and SRP are not obligated to purchase and accept effluent that does not meet the quality requirements o f the U . S . Environmental Protection Agency and/or the Arizona Department cf Health Services.
Yh Russell D. Hulse Subscribed and sworn to before me this /[i"E day of . 4 L u a Lc/, 1982.
o o *
". v* u ;* ,f,
,Q s.s'..w C 'C/l0ALGV v Notary Public g' My commission expires:
7'r Ccmmis:!cn D ires ?.e n ,en u
e
4
^
Attachment RDH-1 1
RESUME RUSSELL D. HULSE
- 2. Veteran of U.S. Army.
- 3. Worked as Engineer for Consumers Power Company for two years.
- 4. Joined APS Engineering Department in 1952.
- 5. Held a number of supervisory and managerial jobs in en-gineering and construction. Worked on Four Corners Power Plant and Transmission System.
- 6. Staff function on developing Navajo Project.
- 7. Have worked on contractual relationships of a number of joint venture projects.
- 8. Instrumental in developing scientifically oriented en-vironmental management group in Company.
- 9. Present title is Vice President of Resources Planning; l
responsible for Power Contracts, System Planning, Fuel Supply and Water Resources. In addition, is Vice Pres-ident and General Manager of two fuel related subsid-iary companies.
- 10. Chairman of Western Energy Supply and Transmission (WEST) Management Committee.
- 11. APS' Representative to Western Systems Coordinating Council.
l I
. - _ - - - - -- - . - . . .-. - ~. . - _ - - . _, -. - - . ~ _-. -
%ut 26,' nel i
1 f
l FL0w PROJECilON COWARISON
. H. A.C. 208 STUDY VS. PHOLNIX WASTEWATER DIVISION PROJECI!ON IN M.G.D. ,
ly #J' - 1979 1960 1981 198 F , tl 1990 1995 7000 I a
'ADIUAL AdiuAL 208 ACTUAL Cliv(1) 208 CITY d 208 CliY 208 CITT 208 CITT g RPT. PROXCHON RPT. PROJECTION _ jCRPim PROJECTION RPi u , PROJECTION RPT.
PROJECTION L~
P
$ 22.32 32.25 36.40 34.55 40.26 37.20 37.20 37.20 37.20 37.20 37.20 37.20 37.2Q 0 23RD AVE. WIP 50.53 52.34 40.20* 51.78 53.14 43.90 64.07 49.55 77.82 55.25 91.57 62.35 105.42 N .91ST AVE.,._
P l - --
77.62 84.59 76.60 86.33 93.40 81.15 101.27 86.75 115.02 92.45 128.77 99.55 142.62 x 10TAL -( 2 )
lSc0TTSD,uE (2) 7.85 6.89 9.60 8.20 8.09 10.25 9.56 10.55 - '10.43 10.75 11.30 11.35 12.74 10.33 11.73 13.20 12.48 13.27 11.20 18.77 11.60 22.70 11.90 26.81 12.30 30.73 l CLENDALE (3)(4)(5) 19.20 23.52 31.98 22.40 40.44 24.20 49.90 MESA (6)(7) 8.19 9.67 13.90 11.80 13.36 _20.70 j
(8) 9.55 7.57 13.20 8.02 8.82 16.40 11.94 18.10 15.39 19.80 18.74 21.80 22 19 lTEMPE 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.21 0.24 0.14 0.24 0.14 0.24 0.14 0.25 0.14 0.25
, !Y0uhCi0wN IOI ALS 113.96 120.67 126.64- 127.04 137.18 138.34 165.30 147.84 195.76 157.44 226.31 169.34 258.40
. g-(1) ESi! HATED ON 6 MONTHS ACTUAL FLOW. (4) INCLUDES SUN CITY FLOW. (7) HESA WWIP.001 0F SERVICE IN 1985 g (2) INCLUCES \ OF PARADISE VALLEY FLOW. (5) PEDRIA FLOW TO TOLLESON WWTP IN 1985. (8) INCLUDES GUADALUPE FLOW.
(3) 1980 208 REPORI INCLUDES PEORIA FLOW. (6) 1980 208 REPORT = KSA PLANT IN SERVICE $
B
?
~
j . .
m:~,
i
, ' l l yt$
a fa" 8?~
L f .
8 g 9 .
1 Y
6 Y 2 9 4 9 0 2 T 4 6 1 T A .
I I t 5 6 7 9 ' C 5 6 6 9 .
C 8 4 3 6 9 s 7 1
+ + + +
u 1 1 j
a t .
A l
D E -
E I LT TT .
BN I N ,
AE 0 6 4 LU V 5 9 6 6 MtK Y 3 I L Af 80 0l OL Cf 8D 0t 5 4 3 9 4 5 4 9 2i 2 1 VF 2i 3 4 5 Nf - - -
AE S 4 UE S L 9 2 2 2
- _ A
- T 9 9 9 9 O 8 0 0 0 1 1 1 T
L A "
) T ~
) . D O 4 4 4 4 O 9 9 9 9 C T D. H 9 9 9 9 C 7 7 7 7 5 5 5 5 H (
I. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
(
R 0 0 0 0 0 d 2 2
- 7 5
5 E P 8 P 5 5 5 8 C P 8 8 9 P 2 2 2 2' .
9 A N 8 0 1 N 3 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 S A A U T T N .
N T E E N U S U E L T L u .
8 8 8 8 f N .
8 8 8 8 f l f D.
f E f . D.
f E f 6 2
6 2
'6 2
'6 2
D I.
6 2
6 2
6 2
6 2
E I. Y I Y B T I B T D I C N I E t C I - 0
- C ! C I E T 7 7 7 7 T J L L L 0 0 0 0 O C U C 1 R W H W 1 1 l
H P S 0 0 0 0 S 1 1 U D U E E ~
L T T
B I A
L M I M A O V f C F A a 2 2 2 2 N A 2 2 2 2 C 5 5 5 5 U C 5 5 5 5 A A 6 6 6 6 6 6 '6 6 l15 N
N 6 0 O 0 6 1 0 O Y 0 1 I Y 3 7 3 4 I T 3 7 3 4 T i T I 5 5 6 8 C l 5 5 6 8 C C 6 9 2 5 E C 6 9 2 5 E 1 1 2 2 J 1 1 2 2 J O O R R P P
W W O
- O L L Y 4 1 8 8 F Y 4 1 8 8 F 8O 8O 0U 4 5 5 8 0U 4 5 5 8 2I 3 4 5 6 2T 3 4 5 6
_ S 1 1 1 1 S 1 1 1 1 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 0 8 9 0 8
9 9
9 9
9 0 9 M 9 0 ,
1 1 1 2 1 l' 1 2
?
, i1 4
e Attachment 2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Maricopa Association of Governments Point Source Metro Phoenix 208 Wastewater Management Plan, Appendix C (July 1979)
m EPA-IX-AZ-MARICOPA-MAG 208-79 4
46 [ ' o U.S.. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT w
MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERhENTS
<: POINT SOURCE METRO PHOENIX a ', 208 WASTE'4ATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 5 JULY 1979 a l
.5 '
i$'?a ?)
.'s as .WGY 7456 Approved by:
6tYN" ph WW% 1 bfd.h; Paul De Falco, Jr.
- /$:',?.' Regional Administrator M[jy[. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency D
G*s'&,-;;
~*
Region IX hI:<:hI.'#
- 2 *y.'
i$g.y; N =ki M.4sh1 3Mi, P,
Tuk :
m__
n
~
a
_ _ _ _ ._ ~_ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ - ___a
~
APPENDIX C WASTEWATER FIDWS FROM THE 91ST AND 23RD AVENUE TREATMENT PLANTS VS. EXISTING COMMITMENTS AND OTHER CLAIMS ON EFFLUENT FOR REUSE Prepared by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Phoenix Urban Study Office and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Region IX .
I e
i FIDWS FROM 23RD AND 91ST ' AVENUE TREATMENT PLANTS The amount of effluent available from the 23rd and 91st Avenue treatment' plants for the period 1980 to the year 2000 has been estimated. as shown in the following table.
TABLE C-1
- FIDWS FROM 23RD AVENUE AND 91ST AVENUE PLANTS 1980 - 2000 (in mgd) 1980 1983 1985 1990 1995 2000 91st Avenue 84.5 98.0 102.9 113.7 124.3 137.0 23rd Avenue 36.5 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.7 37.2 ,
TOTAL 121.0 134.4 139.3 150.1 161 .0 174.2 These estimates of flows were prepared on the basis of Arizona Department ' of Economic Security (DES) population projec-tions, population allocations within Maricopa County made by the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), wastewater unit flows developed in the MAG 208 Water Quality Management Program (MAG 208 Program), and waste flow reduction projections also developed in the MAG 208 Program. The figures in the table reflect the lotg-range MAG flow reduction goals of about 10 ' percent by the year 2000 Population forecasts will be adjusted yearly and reflected in MAG 208 Plan updates. It is expected that they will be adjusted slightly upward for the next few years due to unusually rapid growth in the area. However, the longer range (year 2000) fore-casts are 'still considered to be accurate.
The 1983 flows in the table represent the addition of the El Mirage (.4 mgd), Surprise (.4 mgd), Luke AFB (1.5 mgd), Guadalupe
( .5 mgd), and Gilbert (.1 mgd) flows to the 91st Avenue plant,
- ~along with the 3.3 mgd flows from Mesa due to the abandonment of the Mesa treatment plant. ,
C-1 K--______--.
l EFFLUENT COMMITMENTS Effluent from the 23rd Avenue treatment plant is currently discharged to a canal which empties into the Salt River. An undetermined amount of effluent is taken up from the canal for use by Mcdonald Farms, a private farming operation. The Roosevelt Irrigation District has an option .for 20,000 af/yr of 23rd Avenue plant effluent, provided that: (1) it meets standards for unre-stricted agricultural irrigation, (2) it can be economically transported to the district's existing canal system, and (3) it is not required as cooling water for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, as described below.
Effluent from the 91 st Avenue plant is committed for use as cooling water at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (up to 140,000 af /yr), to the Buckeye Irrigation Company for restricted agricultural irrigation (30,000 af/yr), and to the Arizona Game and Fish. Department for maintenance of a wildlife management area in the Salt River bed near 115th Avenue (7,300 af/yr). A commit-ment of 1,200 af /yr to the U.S. Water Conservation Laboratory was cancelled when the laboratory's research facilities at Flushing Meadows were washed out by flood waters in 1978.
The contract for sale of effluent for use at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station was negotiated in 1973 between the cities in the Multi-City Sewer Agreement and the Arizona Public Service Company ( APS) and the Salt River Project (SRP). APS is the project manager for the station, and the project is known as the Arizona Nuclear Power Project (ANPP).
The commitment for the sale of effluent to ANPP is secondary to prior commitments of effluent to the Buckeye Irrigation Company and the Arizona Game and Fish Department. On the other hand, the agreement between the City of' Phoenix and the Roosevelt Irrigation District is clearly secondary to the agreement with ANPP. The amount and legal status of the use of effluent from the 23rd Avenue plant by Mcdonald Farms is currently unknown. It is possible that the Farms has a right to effluent prior to either ANPP's or Roosevelt Irrigation District's rights.
The amount of effluent optioned in the ANPP contract is 140,000 af/yr. If the amount of effluent at the 91st Avenue plant is insufficient to meet the requirements of the commitment, then the contract calls for use of ef fluent from the 23rd Avenue treatment plant. The contract requires the cities to deliver to C-2
~
W f f
~. .
ANPP, after first satisfying the prior commitments to the Buckeye Irrigation District and the Arizona Game and Fish Department, all of the effluent available at the 91st and 23rd Avenue plants up to the maximum amount of 140,000 af/yr. The contract expressly disclaims any warranty that 140,000 acre-feet of effluent will become available at any time or in any year. However, whenever that quantity does become available, the cities are requirad to deliver such amount, according to the contract.
The contract also commits the cities not to install any new treatment plants that will impair the ability of the cities to deliver the amount of effluent optioned to ANPP. The contract exempts from this commitment the new treatment facilities planned for installation in the Gila and lower Litchfield tributary basins, as identified and described in the Wastewater Report for the Valley Metropolitan Area of Phoenix, Arizona (John Carollo Engineers, 1968). These treatment plants are known as the Chandler and Reems Road plants in the selected 208 wastewater management plan.
Development of a Northeast plant was vigorously opposed by APS and SRP because it would impair the ability of the cities to meet the effluent commitment as specified in the ANPP contract.
APS and SRP indicated that they wculd oppose development of the plant until such time as "(1) the capacity of the 91st Avenue and 23rd Avenue Plants has been expanded to permit fulfillment of all outstanding commitments for delivery of wastewater ef fluent from such plants and (ii) effluent flows are sufficient to meet such commitments" (Arizona Public Service and Salt River Project, i 1978). Regarding the Tolleson plant, APS and SRP stated that they were opposed to the temporary diversion of flows from Glendale and Sun City East unless they could "obtain either an assurance that such diversion will not become permanent or a right to acquire wastewater effluent from the Tolleson plant equivalent to that diverted from the 91st Avenue Plant. . ." ( Arizona Public Service and Salt River Project, 1978). However, the contract does not preclude expansion of plants such as that at Tolleson.
The option on the effluent , as agreed to in the 1973 con-trac t , was exercised in mid-1976, when the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 received construction permits from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Actual delivery of effluent for cooling water will not take place until 1982 when the first unit at Palo Verde is scheduled to go on line. The second l
unit is scheduled to go on line in 1984 and the third in 1986.
Approval is being sought for two additional units. If approved,
-the fourth unit would go on line in 1988 and the fif th in 1990.
C-3 1 -
l Each unit at Palo Verde is estimated to require 21,400 af/yr of effluent. Three units would require 64,200 af/yr of effluent, and all five units would require 107,000 af/yr. During the summer months when atmospheric conditions result in highest evaporation rates, the peak requirements for cooling water are estimated to range from 2,200 to 2,600 af/mo.
These estimates of water use per unit at Palo Verde were furnished to the MAG 208 Program on August 10, 1978, by E. E. Van Brunt, APS Vice President and ANPP Project Director. More recent estimates of annual use in the Draft Environmental Statement Related to Construction of Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Units 4 and 5 (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1979) vary from 21,300 to 23,500 af/yr per unit (106,500 to 117,500 af/yr for 5 units). It was not felt that this analysis, which assumes 21,400 af/yr per unit or 107,000 af/yr for 5 units, needed to be revised, as the estimates that were used were relatively conservative. The basic conclusions of the analysis would be the same using the range of estimates of sausal use found in the Palo Verde Units 4 and 5 Environmental Statemeat, except that use of higher estimates in the range (115,000 and 117,500 af/yr) would result in a greater and earlier shortfall of effluent for Palo Verde.
^ This analysis, however, does not include other factors which
~
need to be considered , but for which the necessary inforamtion is .
not available. One is the amount of effluent that may be lost between the headworks of the 91st Avenue and 23rd Avenue treatment plants and the nuclear reactors. The second is the amount of effluent that may be available for delivery to the power plant but cannot be used because of unacceptable quality. The third is peak demand requirements of the Buckeye Irrigation District. All of these factors will reduce, by soc.c unknown amount, the quantity of effluent available for Palo Verde. Because of these factors , the conclusions on availability of effluent for Palo Verde stated in this analysis are likely to be better than the actual situation.
ANALYSIS OF AVAILABIZ Fl.OWS AND COMMITMENTS Figures C-1 through C-3 (following pages) plot the flows available from the 23rd Avenue and 91st Avenue plants under the selected wastewater management plan and show the projected uses and ultimate commitments to ANPP , the Buckeye Irrigation Company, and the Arirona Game and Fish Department. The flow needs of the C-4 b.Y f .
hffhh ,I45f
five Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station units are shown as follows: 1) annual demand of 21,400 af/yr per unit (Figure C-1);
- 2) low estimate of peak month flow needs of 2,200 af/mo, or a flow rate of 26,400 af/yr, per unit (Figure C-2); and 3) high estimate of peak month flow needs of 2,600 af/mo, or a flow rate of 31,200 af/yr, per unit (Figure C-3). Flows are shown in thousands of acre-feet per year and millions of gallons per day (1 mgd = 1,120 af/yr).
Figures C-1 through C-3 indicate .the following:
- 1. Maximum flows available from the two trea tment plants are not sufficient to meet the peak month needs of all five units under the high estimate of needs (Figure C-3 ) .
- 2. With the exception of the Arizona Game and Fish Depart-ment's flow of 7,300 af /yr, discharge to the Salt River would be eliminated during the peak months starting in 1988 under the high peak month estimate of needs, and in 1990 under the low peak month estimate (Figures C-2, C-3). . ,
- 3. Flow for the Roosevelt Irrigation District's commitment
'. (20,000 af/yr), or for the development of the Northeast plant (diverting flows of 9.1 mgd), would not be avail-able until af ter 1995 if the cities must first meet the maximum commitment of 140,000 af/yr to ANPP (Figure C-1).
4 Effluent available from the 91st Avenue plant only, under the low estimate of peak month needs, would be suf ficient for the first three units on schedule and the fourth unit sometime between 1995 and 2000 (Figure -
C-2).
- 5. Effluent available from the 91st Avenue plant only, under the high estimate of peak month needs, would be sufficient for the first two units on schedule , the third reactor between 1990 and 1995, and the fourth reactor af ter the year 2000 (Figure C-3).
~
C-5 W '
1 ti ,
'l k
Md t5
[ '^
Q MGEND 4
g + Flows From 91 at Ave. WWTP Only ( ,,
E ~
- O Flows From 23 rd Ave. and I^
- 91 et Ave. WWTP 4 200- 224 - Estier.ates of Annual Water Needs s
L 3
o,,,3 U er S on r 15 0 - 168 __
y,,..- -"**
- ~
Reactor 5 (1990) 129 MGD or 144.300 AF/Yr
,, 110 MGD or 122.900 AF/Yr ..,
100
- tt2 p,** Reactor 4 (1988) 91 MGD or 101,500 AF/Yr ,
Reactor 3 (1988) l s 72 MGD or 80,100 AF/Yr 1 i Reactor 2 (1984) Ar 50 56 52 MGD or 58.700 AF/Yr ,
Reactor 1 (1982) 33 MGD or 37.300 AF/Yr ,
- 2T MGD or 30,000 AF/Yr Arlror.a Game and L.
O g
Buckeye irri9ation District I;
1980 83 85 90 95. 2000
. Year :
- wainout noose ein irri 9 .iion oi.trici. AVAILABLE FLOWS 23RD AVENUE & 91ST commitroent o. ruw. to ucoon.id r.,,, AVENUE WWTP VS. EXISTING COMMITMENTS * 'f
. Figure C-1 5:
, h' a
> I
[s tEGEND
) 9 Flows from 9I st Ave. WWTP Only 0 Flows from 23 rd Ave, and *
- 91 at Ave. WWTP
~ Estimates of Annual Water Needs
... +. Low Estimate of Peak Month Reactor Needs
,,e** '
Ma ximum Commited Flow ,g,*** -
158 MGD or 177.300 AF/Yr ISO 168 Under AMiWDWd ,
- :_- - 35 g ugo M ! Reactor 5 (1990)
Od * , ,y * *
- 3
! H,,,***-
O ***.E 128 MGo j-
- o. ,,...***-
! e ***, Reactor 4 (1988)
O N
I .**,.*$"**..=
~~~
104 MGO IOOA 112 ,,** *
,,j Reactor 3 (1986)
. ... 2 j: -?- - - ---- - - - -- -- 80 MGD
! Reactor 2 (1984) 57 MGD 4:
50- 56 $
, ! Reactor 1 (1982)
^
33 MGD 2TMGO .
Fish Department Buckeye irrigation Olstrict O _, _ _. _
1980 85 85 90 95 2000 Year '
"Without Roosevelt irrigation D6stricts Commitment or Flows to Mcdonald Farm
- AVAILABLE FLOWS 23RD AVENUE & 91ST *
. AVENUE WWTP VS. EXISTING COMMITMENTS
- Figure C-2
.I
LEGEND q j
- Q Fiswa Frcm 91 at Ave. WWTP Only [
0 Flows from 23 ed Ave. and
{
O
- 91 at Ave. WWTP
- - EsDmates of Annual Water Needs
~
""= High Estimates of Peak Month
' Beactor Needs y ,,,,,-------g > 173 MGO M a nimum, Comtnited Flow_ ,o.***
168 under APS / SAP Contract Reactor 5 (1990)
ISO g ...-y 145 MGD
'L .
O [
.o Reactor 4 (1988)
"~
, y, ---
-"gA * *$ ----, 117 MGO n . .. .
E 10 0
- 182 p.** Reactor 3 (1988) s
,,,,.**+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 89 MGO Reactor 2 (1984) 4 3 k d
p----------------------. 61 MGO
$ ) 50 56 r Reactor 1 (1982)
,J
' ' 33 MGD 1
- 27 MGD Arizona Garne and Buckeye irrigation District 2T MGO or 30.000 AFIYr Flah Department
,t i,
' O .. .
'* 1980 83 85 90 95 2000 6g Year f l
- wan-ai noo.e.en wris.i.on o..ir.ci= AVAILABLE FLOWS 23RD AVENUE & 91ST 0 Commitment or Flows to ucoonald Farma AVENUE WWTP VS. EXISTING COMMITMENTS
- M Figure C-3 N,'
4 ,
[ 4
$h a
kk
REFERENCES John Carollo Engineers, 1968. Wastewater Report for the Valley Metropolitan Area of Phoenix', Arizona.
Arizona Public Service and Salt River Project, 1978.' Letter from Russell P. Hulse, Arizona Public Service Company, and Leroy Michael, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, to H. W. Worthington, Chief, Phoenix Urban Study, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, September 20, 1978.
-- Arizona Public Service, 1978. Letter from E. E. Van Brunt, Jr., APS Vice President, . ANPP Project Director, to H. W.
Worthington, Chief, Phoenix Urban Study, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , August 10, 1978.
U.S. Nuclea;- Regulatory Commission, 1979. Draft Environmental Sta tament Related to Construction of Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Units .4 and 5, Proposed by Arizona Public -
~
Service Company, et al. FUREG-0522, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Washington, D.C., April 1979.
C-9
- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - a
i Attachment 3 Intervencr's Response to Joint Applicants' Request for Admissions, Motion to Dismiss Contention No. 8, and Second Set of Interrogatories (undated) l 1
l
i .
UNITED STATES Of AMERICA NUCLEAR REGUIATORY C0!?.ISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD _,,
In The Matter of )
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE Docket Nos. STN 60- 28 COMPANY,et al. ) STN 10- 29
) STN$0-30 .
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating )
Station Unitsi .2 and 3 )
1 i
/
/
INTERVENOR$' RES00NSE TO 00INI APPLICINIS' REQUEST F09. ADMISSIONS ,KTION TO DISMISS j COMrENTION NO.8. AND SEC01D SET OF INTERROGATORIES. j The following list of nos. ard answeis ccrresponds with Joint A kicants REQUESTS F0,R ADMISSIONS; ,
4.True 5.True 6.True ' & True j8.True
/
- 1. False 2. False 3.True
/.
- e 9.True 10.True 11.True 12.True 13.True 14.True thirue ,
/
16.True 17.True 18.True 19.True 20.Trte 21.True 22. Trua 2h.True 25.Two 26.True , 27, Tru. 28 frue 29.True 23.Fr.ls e 26.True . ,
d After careful consideration of all the facts concerning contention f8 I have decided to withdraw contentien p 8.. therefor the Motion to dismiss Contention f 8 and joint applicants second seit of interrogatories are answered.
L _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Attachment 4 Joint Applicants' Request for Admissions by Intervenor May 22, 1981 1
_ _ _ i 1- _ E J
, 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE ) Docket Nos. STN 50-528 COMPANY, et al. ) STN 50-529
) STN 50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating )
Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 )
)
JOINT APPLICANTS' REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS BY INTERVENOR Joint Applicants hereby request Intervenor within thirty ( 30 ) days after service of this request to make the following admissions for the purposes of this action only and subject to all pertinent objections to admissibility _.
which may be interposed at tr.al.
That each of the following numbered statements is true.
- 1. The basis for the contention that the quantity of effluent available during the period 1986 through 1990 is not sufficient for the operation of Palo Verde Units 1, 2 and 3 is Appendix C (Wastewater Flows from the 91st and 23rd Avenue Treatment Plants vs. Existing Commitments and Other Claims on Effluent for Reuse, prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Phoenix Urban Study Off.ce and U.S. Environ-mental Protection Agency, Region IX)M *o the U.S. Environmen-M hereinafter referred to as " Appendix C."
O l
s tal Agency Final Environmental Impact Statement on Maricopa Association of Governments Point Source Metro Phoenix 208 Wastewater Management Plan, July, 1979.
t
- 2. Appendix C states that the amount of effluent-available from the 23rd Avenue and 91st Avenue Sewage Treat-ment Plants has been estimated as shown in the following table:
91st Ave. 23rd Ave.
Year Plant Plant Total 1980 84.5 MGD 36.5 MGD 121.0 MGD 1983 98.0 36.4 134.4 1985 102.9 36.4 36.7
, 1990 113.7 36.4 139.3 l
1995 124.3 36.7 161.0 2000 137.0 37.2 174.2
- 3. The appropriate conversion factor to express an average daily flow rate designated in millions of gallons
! per day (MGD) in thousands of acre-feet (AF) per year is 1.12.
- 4. The appropriate conversion factor to express an average daily flow rate designated ir M7Ds in thousands
, of AF per month is 0.093.
1
- 5. The following table is a reasonably accurate conversion of the estimated effluent average flow rates shown in Appendix C and Statement 2 hereof into annual quan-tities of effluent:
91st Ave. 23rd Ave.
Year Plant Plant Total 1980 94,640 AF 40,880 AF 135,520 AF 1983 109,760 40,770 150,530 1985 115,250 40,770 156,020 1990 127,340 40,770 168,110 1995 139,220 41,100 180,320 2000 153,440 41,660 195,100
- 6. The quantity of effluent discharged in 1980 from the 91st Avenue Plant was 88.46 MGD and from the 23rd Avenue Plant was 33.79 MOD as shown in Attachment 1 to this Request for Admissions.
- 7. As stated in Appendix C, page C-2, the exist-ing commitments for effluent discharged from nhe 91st Avenue
~
Plant are:
Buckeye Irrigation District 30,000 AF Arizona Department of Game and Fish 7,300 AF Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 140,000 AF
- 8. As stated in Appendix C, page C-2, the fore-going commitments of effluent from the 91st Avenue Plant to
, Buckeye Irrigation District and Arizona Department of Game and Fish must be satisfied prior to the release of effluent to meet the commitment for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
j l
- 9. As stated in Appendix C, page C-2, the exist-ing commitments of effluent from the 23rd Avenue Plant are as follows:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station 140,000 AF less the amount of effluent available to PVNGS at 91st Ave. Plant Roosevelt Irrigation District 20,000 AF Mcdonald Farms Indeterminate
- 10. As stated in Appendix C, page C-2, the fore-going commitment of effluent from the 23rd Avenue Plant to Roosevelt Irrigation District is secondary to and subject to the availability of effluent after satisfaction of the com-mitment to Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
- 11. The quantities of effluent available in any year at the 91st Avenue Plant for use at Palo Verde Nuclear -
Generating Station are the quantities of effluent produced at the 91st Avenue Plant in such year less the quantities of effluent committed to Buckeye Irrigation District (i.e.,
30,000 AF per year), and the Arizona Department of Game and Fish (i.e., 7,300 AF per year).
- 12. Based on the estimated quantities of effluent to be produced at the 91st Avenue Plant as shown in Appendix C and Statements 2 and 5 hereof, the estimated quantities of effluent to be available for use at Palo Verde Nuclear Gen-erating Station are as follows:
~
i Total Effluent Produced at Effluent Committed Balance Available Year 91st Ave. Plant to BID and ADGF for use at PVNGS (AF) (AF) (AF) 1983 109,760 37,300 72,460 1985 115,250 37,300 77,950 1990 127,340 37,300 90,040 1995 139,220 37,300 101,920 2000 153,440 37,300 116,140
- 13. In 1986, the estimated quantity of effluent to be produced at the 91st Avenue Plant determined by inter-polation of the. estimates shown in Appendix C and State-ments 2 and 5 hereof, is 105.0 MGD or 117,600 AF.
- 14. In 1986, the estimated quantity of effluent to be produced at the 91st Avenue P'lant and available for use at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, after sat- ~
isfaction of the prior commitments to Buckeye Irrigation District and the Arizona Department of Game and Fish, is 80,300 AF.
- 15. In addition to the amount of effluent avail-able from the 91st Avenue Plant for use at Palo Verde' Nu-clear Generating Station, the estimated quantity of effluent available in 1986 from the 23rd Avenue Plant for use at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is, as set forth in Appen-dix C and Statements 2 and 5 hereof, 36.4 MGD or 40,770 AF, less such amount of effluent, if any, for which Mcdonald Farm may have an established prior right.
L d
4
- 16. Attachment 2 is a true and correct copy of Exhibit C - Effluent Flow Projections, Greeley and Hansen, January, 1980, of the City of Phoenix 23rd and 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plants - Draft Residuals Management Fa-cility Plan, Volume 5 - Phase C Effluent Discharge Assess-ment, August, 1980, by Arthur Beard Engineers, Inc., and Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., a copy of which document will be made available for examination at the offices of counsel for the Joint Applicants.
- 17. The estimated quantities of effluent to be produced at the 91st Avenue Plant in 1983, 1985 and 1986, as shown in Attachment 2, are the same as the estimates shown in Appendix C for 1983 and 1985 and as the estimate for 1986 determined by interpolation of the estimates shown in Ap- _.
pendix C.
- 18. The analysis presented in Appendix C assumes that 21,400 AF of effluent will be required annually for operation of each of the Palo Verde units.
- 19. The Draft Environmental Statement related to the construction of Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Stations Units 4 and 5 - NUREG 0522 (hereinafter " Units 4 & 5 DES")
at page 3-3, states that 21,350 AF of effluent will be re-quired annually for the operation of each of the Palo Verde units.
- 20. The analysis presented in Table C-2 of At-tachment 2 reflects the use of approximately 21,600 AF of L
effluent per year for each of the Palo Verde units.
-5
- 21. The usage of 21,350 AF of effluent per year per unit, as set forth in Section 5.6.1 of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2 and 3 Environmental ,
l Report - Operating License Stage (hereinafter "ER-OL"), is '
based upon the assumptions that each Palo Verde unit will l
operate at a capacity factor of 95% of rated power for 11 '
l months each year and a one-month outage each year for re-l fueling and maintenance. .
l
- 22. The statement in Units 4 & 5 DES at page 5-1 that 46,000 AF of effluent will be used annually for Palo Verde Units 4 and 5 assumed the operation of each of such
)
units at a 95% capacity factor for 12 months with monthly i cooling tower makeup requirements as set forth in Table
! 5.1 on page 5-2 of the Units 4 & 5 DES. .
. 23. As set forth in Appendix C, in 1986 the esti-l mated amount of effluent to be produced at the 91st Avenue Plant and available for use at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is greater than the amount of effluent required for operation of all of the three units at Palo Verde at a 95%
l capacity factor 11 months a year with a one-month outage for l
l refueling and maintenance.
l
- 24. As set forth in Attachment 2, in June, 1986, the estimated amount of effluent available at the 91st Ave-nue Plant for use at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station j is 0.6 MGD or 56 AF less than will be required to operate 1
l all three Palo Verde units at 95% capacity factors during said month.
l ,
- 25. As set forth in Attachment 2, in each month other than June, 1986, the estimated amount of effluent available at the 91st Avenue Plant for use at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is greater than the amount re-quired to operate all three Palo Verde units at 95% capacity factors during each such month.
- 26. As set forth in Section 3.3.1 of the ER-OL, the capacity of the reservoir at Palo Verde Nuclear Gen-erating Station is 2300 AF.
- 27. The deficiency in effluent available at the 91st Avenue Plant for use at Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station in June, 1986, as shown in Attachment 2, is less than 3% of the capacity of the Palo Verde reservoir.
- 28. The deficiency in effluent available at the s 91st Avenue Plant for use at Palo Verd? Nuclear Generating Station in June, 1986, as shown in Attachment 2, is less l than 3% of the amount of effluent re. quired to operate one Palo Verde unit at a 95% capacity factor during such month.
- 29. If there is inadequate treated effluent in the Palo Verde reservoir to make up the 56 AF deficiency in available effluent in June, 1986, a deficiency in the avail-l able effluent of less than 3% of that amount required to permit operation of one unit at a 95% capacity factor during such month would result in the reduction of the capacity
! factor at which such unit could operate during such month from vo% to approximately 92%.
l l
l l
l
- 30. A 3% reduction in the capacity factor of a single unit for a period of one month will not change signi-ficantly the cost-benefit analysis of Palo Verde Units 1, 2 and 3.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this @ day of May, 1981.
By "KRTHUR C. GTmHR CHARLES A. BISCHO 3100 Valley Bank Center Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Attorneys for Joint Applicants e
l
_9
Attachment l~
Page 1 of 2 t
TO Robert L. Brunton DATE Jan. 27, 1981 Development Services Manager w FROM aobert a. steytler, P.E.
Assistant Director Wastewater Operations i SUBJECT TREATMENT PLANT FLOWS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1980#
l
. OTY OF PHOENIX Attached is the flow data that you had requested for the 91st Avenue
' Plant. They seem to be in line with our earlier projections.
For your information, the flow at the 23rd Avenue Plant averaged 33.79 MGD in 1980, i
7 61 F5bert B. Ste p r, P.E. '
Asst. Director Wastewater Operations I
.--~ -
cc: Max T. Palmer Jim Webb
- - = -
~.:..--- .--c -. - - - ----
t i
1 1
t
(
t
Attachmsnt 1 Page.2 of 2' TO Robert B. Steytler, Ass't Director DATE 1-23-81 1 Water & Sewer Dept., Administration ,
w FROM Kenneth E. Spiker, Superintendent Wastewater Collections SUBJECT MULTI-CITY WASTEWATER FLOWS - 1780 OTY OF PHOEMX 1980 MULTI-CITY FLOWS 91ST AVE. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
' CITY ACTUAL FLOW (mod)- CORRECTED FLOOD FLOW (med)
Total 91st 88.46 92.41 Glendale 12.48 12.48 Youngtown 0.21 0,?1 Tempe 8.02 8.C2 Mesa 11.80 11.80 Scottsdale 8.20 8.20 Phoenix Share 47.76 51.70 i Kenneth . Spiker, Superintendent Wastewater Collections KES/dir l
I
. ~ .
- ~ ~ - . --
l
~ _ . _ . . . . . . . .
L _ _ _ _ . . _ ._ .. _ _ .. . . . . .
e ,
bf EXHIBIT C EFFLUENT FLOW PROJECTIONS GREELEY AND HANSEN JANUARY 1980
=
em Attachment 2 O
% J
t i
i
. i TABLE C-1 PLANT EFFLUENT FLOW PROJECTIONS 23rd Avenue 91st Avenue Plant Effluent Flows, mgd 'dombined Effluent Flows, agd <
Plant Effluent Flows, mgd Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum Month Average Minimum Minimum !
1980 121.7 114.8 55.0 38.3 36.4 18.9 83.4 78.4 36.1 January 124.1 116.6 54.5 37.9 35.6 16.4 86.2 81.0 38.1 February 117.9 58.6 37.2 36.1 17.7 88.0 81.8 40.9 125.2 March 125.2 115.1 55.9 April 37.2 35.0 17.5 88.0 80.1 38.4 34.2 18.9 88.9 79.1 41.1 125.4 113.4 60.0 May 36.5 59.4 34.6 18.7 88.9 78.2 40.7 125.7 112.8 June 36.8 70.9 35.0 21.7 91.6 83.4 49.2 128.8 118.4 July 37.2 65.2 34.3 20.6 93.4 84.1 44.6 129.5 118.4 August 36.1 67.1 33.9 20.7 99.8 92.8 46.4 135.5 126 7 September 35.7 65.7 21.2 97.0 87.3 44.5 132.0 120.9 .
October 35.0 33.6 119.2 58.6 33.9 32.2 17.7 92.5 87.0 40.9 126.4 November 119.2 60.7 35.7 33.9 18.0 90.7 85.3 42.7 126.4 December (Continued)
\
TABLE C-1 (Continued) ,
. ?., ,
LQ 23rd Avenue -
91st Avenue
_ Plant Effluent Flows, mgd Plant Effluent Flows, agd Combined Effluent Flows, mgd ;
Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Gaily Monthly Weekly Daily l Month Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum _ Minimum Average Minimum Minimum 1981 January 38.3 36.4 18.9 85.6 80.5 37.0 123.9 116.9 55.9 i February 37.9 35.6 16.4 88.4 83.1 39.1 126.3 118.7 55.5 }
March 37.2 36.1 17.7 90.2 83.9 42.0 127.4 120.0 59.7 April 37.2 35.0 17.5 90.2 82.1 39.4 127.4 117.1 56.9
, May 36.5 34.2 18.9 91.1 - 81.1 42.2 127.6 115.3 61.1 June 36.8 34.6 18.7 91.1 80.2 41.7 127.3 114.8 60.4 July 37.2 35.0 21.7- 93.9 85.4 50.4 131.1 120.4 72.1 I August 36.1 34.3 20.6 95.8 86.2 45.7 . '131.9 120.5 66.3 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 102.3 95.1 47.6 138.0 129.0 68.3 October 35.0 33.6 21.2 99.5 89.6 45.7 134.5 123.2 66.9 November 33.9 T2.2 17.7 94.9 89.2 41.9 128.8 121.4 59.6 December- 35.7 33.9 18.0 93.0 87.4 43.7 128.7 121.3 61.7 1982 January 38.3 36.4 18.9 87.9 82.6 38.0 126.2 119.0 56.9 February 37.9 35.6 16.4 90.7 85.3 40.1 128.6 120.9 56.5 March 37.2 36.1 17.7 92.6 86.1 43.1 129.8 122.2 60.8 April 37.2 35.0 17.5 92.6 84.3 40.5 129.8 119.3 58.0 May 36.5 34.2 18.9 93.6 83.3 43.3 130.1 117.5 62'2 June 36.8 34.6 18.7 93.6 82.4 42.8 130.4 117.0 61.5 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 96.5 87.8 51.8 133.7 122.8 73.5 August 36.1 34.3 20.6 98.4 88.6 47.0 134.5 122.9 67.6 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 105.1 97.7 48.9 140.8 131.6 69.6 October 35.0 33.6 21.2 102.2 92.0 46.9 137.2 125.6 68.1 November 33.9 32.2 17.7 97.4 91.6 43.1 131.3 123.8 60.8 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 95.5 89.8 44.9 131.2 123.7 62.9 (Continued)
J G
.. .. . . . , _ . , , s .. .. .. ,
p .
6
. TABLE'C-1 (Continued) 23rd Avenue 91st Avenue i Combined Effluent F.ows, agd I Plant Effleunt Flows, mgd Plant Effluent Flows, agd Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Month Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum ,
1983 January 38.3 36.4 18.9 90.2 84.8 39.0 128.5 121.2 57.9 Februaqr 37.9 35.6 16.4 93.1 87.5 41.1 131.0 123.1 57.5 March 37.2 36.1 17.7 95.1 88.4 44.2 132.3 124.5 61.9 '
I April 37.2 35.0 17.5 95.1 86.5 41.5 .
132.3 121.5 59.0 May 36.5 34.2 18.9 96.0 85.4 44.4 132.5 119.7 63.3 June 36.8 34.6 18.7 96.0 84.5 43.9 132.8 119.1 62.6 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 99.0 90.1 53.2 136.2 125.1 74.9 August 36.1 34.3 20.6 100.9 90.8 48.1 137.0 125.1 68.7 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 107.8 100.3 50.2 143.5 134.2 70.8 October 35.0 33.6 21.2 104.9 94.4 48.1 139.9 128.0 69.3 Novmeber 33.9 32.2 17.7 100.0 94.0 44.2 133.9 126.2 61.9 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 98.0- 92.1 46.1 133.7 126.0 64.1 1984 January 38.3 36.4 18.9 92.5 87.0 40.0 130.8 123.4 58.9 February 37.9 35.6 16.4 95.5 89.8 42.2 133.4 125.4 58.6 March 37.2 36.1 17.7 97.5 90.7 45.4 134.7 126.8 63.1 April 37.2 35.0 17.5 97.5 88.7 42.6 134.7 123.7 60.1 May 36.5 34.2 18.9 98.5 87.7 45.6 135.0 122.0 64.5 -
June 36.8 34.6 18.7 98.5 86.7 45.1 135.3 121.3 63.8 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 101.5 92.4 54.5 138.7 127.4 75.2 August 36 .1 34.3 20.6 103.5 93.2 49.4 139.6 127.5 70.0 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 110.6 102.9 51.5 146.3 136.8 72.2 October 35.0 33.6 21.2 107.5 96.8 49.4 142.5 130.4 70.6 November 33.9 32.2 17.7 102.5 96.4 45.3 136.4 128.6 63.0 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 100.5 94.5 47.3 136.2 128.4 65.3 (Continued) n 54
TABLE C-1 (Continu;d) n 4 .
23rd Avenue . 91st Avenue Plant Effluent Flows, mgd _ Plant Effluent Flows, mgd Combine ~d Effluent Flows, mgd
, Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Month Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum Ave rage Minimum Minimum 1985 January 38.3 36.4 18.9 94.7 89.0 40.9 133.0 125.4 59.8 Februaqr 37.9 35.6 16.4 97.8 91.9 43.2 135.7 127.5 59.6
-March 37.2 36.1 17.7 99.8 92.8 46.4 137.0 128.9 64.1
- Apri l 37.2 35.0 17.5 99.8 90.8 43.6 137.9 125.8 61.1 May 36.4 34.2 18.9 100.8 89.7 46.6 137.2 124.0 65.5 June 36.8 34.6 18.7 100.8 88.7 46.1 137.6 123.3 64.8 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 103.9 94.5 55.8 141.1 129.5 77.5 August 36.1 34.3 20.6 106.0 95.4 50.6 ,142.1 129.7 71.2 l September 35.7 33.9 20.7 113.2 105.3 52.7 148.9 139.2 73.4 October 35.0 33.6 21.2 110.1 99.1 50.5 145.1 132.7 71.7
% vember 33.9 32.2 17.7 105.0 98.7 46.4 138.9 130.9 64.1
/- acember 35.7 33.9 18.0 102.9 96.7 48.4 138.6 130.6 66.4 19o6 January 38.3 36.4 18.9 96.6 90.8 41.8 134.9 127.2 60.7 Februatr 37.9 35.6 16.4 99.8 93.8 44.1 137.7 129.4 60.5 March 37.2 36.1 17.7 101.9 94.8 47.4 139.1 130.9 65.1 April 37.2 35.0 17.5 101.9 92.7 44.5 139.I 127.7 62.0 May 36.4 - 34.2 18.9 102.9 91.6 139.3 47.6 125.8 66.5 June 36.8 34.6 18.7 102.9 90.6 47.1 139.7 125.2 65.8 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 106.1 96.6 57.0 143.3 131.6 78.7 August 36.1 34.3 20.6 108.2 97.4 51.6 144.3 131.7 72.2 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 115.5 107.4 53.7 151.2 141.3 74.4 October '35.0 33.6 21.2 112.4 101.2 51.6 147.4 134.8 72.8 November 33.9 32.2 17.7 107.1 100.7 47.3 141.0 132.9 65.0 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 105.0 98.7 49.4 140.7 132.6 67.4
_ m
^ ~
l 1 C-5 TABLE C-2 EFFLUENT REUSE FLOW PROJECTIONS l
6
- Monthly Average Reuse Flow Projections, mgd ~
Arizona Buckeye Arizona Game and Fish Irrigation Public Month _ _ Department District Service Total
,1980
.I~ January 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 February 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 March 6.5 25.8 - 33.3 April 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 j 26.8 33.3
, May 6.5 -
i June 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 July 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 August 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 September 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 October 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 i November 6.5' 26.8 - 33.3 December 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 1981 January 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 February 6.5 26.S - 33.3 33.3 March 6.5 26.8 -
April 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 May 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 June 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 July 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 August 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 September 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 October 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 November 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 December 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 1
l (Continued) i t
. C-6.
TABLE C-2 (Continued)
Monthly Average Reuse Flow Projections, mgd Arizona Buckeye Arizona Game and Fish Irrigation Public Nbnth_ _ Department District Service Total, 1982 January 6.5 25.8 33.3 February 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 March 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 April 6.5 . 26.8 -
33.3 May 6.5 -
26.8 -
33.3 June 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 July 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 August 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 September 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 October 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 November 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 December 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 1983 January 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 February 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 March 6.5 26.8 -
33.3
. April 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 May 6.5 26.8 22.1 55.4 June 6.5 26.8 23.4 56.7 July 6.5 26.8 23.1 56.4 August 6.5 26.8 23.1 56.4 September 6.5 26.8 21.7 55.0 October 6.5 26.8 21.0 54.3 November 6.5 26.8 13.6 46.9 December 6.5 26.8 17.9 51.2 1984 J anuary 6.5 26.8 13.1 46.4 February 6.5 26.8 13.4 46.7.
March 6.5 26.8 19.5 52.8 April 6.5 26.8 20.1 53.4 May 6.5 26.8 44.2 77.5 June 6.5 26.8 46.8 80.1 July 6.5 26.8 46.2 79.5 August 6.5 26.8 46.2 79.5 Septeraber 6.5 26.8 43.4 76.7 October 6.5 26.8 42.0 75.3 November 6.5 26.8 27.2 60.5 December 6.5 26.8 35.8 69.1 (Continued) e
(
e e.- *M
^ -'
^-
~
C-7 TABLE C-2 (Continued)
Monthly Average Reuse Flow Projections, mt<1 Arizona Buckeye Arizona Game and Fish Irrigation Public Month Department _ District Service Total 1985
, J anuary 6.5 26.8 26.2 59.5 February 6.5 26.8 25.6 58.9 March 6.5 26.8 39.0 72.3 April , 6.5 26.8 40.2 73.5 May 6.5 26.8 44.2 77.5 June 6.5 26.8 46.8 80.1 July 6.5 26.8 46.2 79.5 August 6.5 26.8 46.2 79.5 September 6.5 26.8 43.4 76.7
,_ October 6.5 26.8 42.0 75.3 November 6.5 26.8 27.2 60.5 December 6.5 26.8 35.8 69.1 1986 January (1987) i 6.5 26.8 26.2 39.5 59.5
, February 6.5 26.8 25.6 40.2 58.9 March 6.5 26.8 39.0 58.5 72.3 April 6.5 26.8 40.2 60.3 73.5 May 6.5 26.8 66'3
. - 99.6 June 6.5 26.8 70.2 - 103.5 July 6.5 26.8 69.3 - 102.6 August 6.5 26.8 69.3 - 102.6 September 6.5 26.8 65.1 - 98.4
, October 6.5 26.8 63.0 - 96.3 1
November 6.5 26.8 40.8 - 74.1 December 6.5 26.8 53.7 - 87.0
~
I 1
~
l -
, , , , i i i -
z **
- s s, m: -
,0 , W m
> - - 5, 1.. <s _-
= <
M
> Z : h,
..s
\ ,
s.
=
m
,/ % .
- >=
J
/ _- _ <
/.. < - - C3 T .., -
=
=
< ~
)\ r N - -
./
y y , -
(y /
s - - .
..T.. .,
Q r 3
( < - .
\ _
f:,, ,- - .
5
= )..1 :
= i <' 3
=
%(
- = - -
= l < = < : - .
5 N\ 5 N : -
=
fv/
- =
,r E
=
-g s .,
..T.7 .
s
-m 3 - ..
\
s - .
( .,
T.. -
-=
] ( -
i
(\- -
s, _
x ; - -
=
\.., (s, -
m =
, s -
==
.- : i
==
\
l l l l l h ! I- -
==
- 03m '80M
m I I I I I i l l -
z O J
% s . - = n. E.
) > > - =
/ / < 2
$N m<
.7 ..
<.,y _ _ m <-
- = - ag ==
I ( - m ao i , > ~
me
, . . oz
~
.7 ow W>
/
> - "m Z4 w
8 - . gg
( E cc
/
sit on L.2 N I4 = = m
\ 1
$ . [
}
,) (
)
( - -
\ .
7 f.( - .
< <, L N 4 m
a N -y - S
( -
- M
~
? __
( - .
- )
- =
( [ ,
(
. \sL's Q 5 1 -
. 2 m
j I %,
Q --
E
\\ /
y 1 2 0
- I I
i /> 5
~
~
=
=
4
[3 f
4
(
, J -
~
~
- 5 ~
E
=
%w - - -
" k -
[
=. > -
i < - -
\' j
\ 3
( .
r- - .
.(' - " ( -
,s - . _
O l ' -= %
5 - - -
)
s r - .
, > - =
- e. ( - .
< _ =
( ,
b - m
( esuma 3 ,
) - . g L <,, - - e O
) -
=E
- g
( . .
~
l lk l l l il l l --' -
- : : : : .: : : = = = = = = = -
. . . - . : E.
~
93t *1013 .
i t _ . .
' ^ ~: L _ --
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE ) Docket Nos. STN 50-528 COMPANY, et al. ) STN 50-529
) STN 50-530 (Palo Verde Nuclear Generating)
Station, Units 1, 2 and 3) )
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " Joint Applicants '
Request for Admissions by Intervenor" have been served upon the following listed persons by deposit in the United States mail, properly addressed and with postage prepaid, or, as indicated by an asterisk, by hand delivery, this 22nd day of May, 1981.
Docketing and Service Section Robert M. Lazo, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman, Atomic Safety and Washington, D.C. 20555 Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Chairman, Maricopa County Commission Board of Supervisors Washington, D.C. 20555 111 South Third Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Dr. Dixon Callahan Union Carbide Corporation i
Dr. Richard F. Cole P.O. Box Y Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Appeal Board Panel Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Henry J. McGurren, Esq.
Bruce Meyerson, Esq. Office of the Executive Arizona Center for Law in Legal Director the Public Interest U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 112 North Fifth Avenue Commission Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Washington, D.C. 20555 f
l N /-
r Charles'Ap Krschog 7
~
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE 1 Docket Nos. STN 50-528 COMPANY, et al. ) STN 50-529
) STN 50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating )
Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 1
)
NOTICE OF CORRECTION In Jcint Applicants' Request for Admissions by Intervenor dated May 22, 1981, in the table on page 2 under Statement No. 2, the numbers appearing under the " Total" column for the-years 1985 and 1990 are incorrect. The numbers should be 139.3 for 1985 and 150.1 for 1990.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this lith day of June ,1981.
By WL y ,r Ap - . -
ARTHUR C. GSffR //
CHARLES A. BISCHOFF 3100 Valley Bank Center Phoenix, Arizona, 85073 Attorneys for Joint Applicants
. i UNITUU STATES Oc' AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE ) Docket Nos. STN 50-528 COMPANY, et al. ) STN 50-529
) STN 50-530 Palo Verde Nuclear Generating ) .
Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 )
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that c'opies of the foregoing " Notice of Correction" have been served upon the following listed personc by deposit in the United States mail, properly addrescod and with postage prepaid, this lith day of June, 1981.
Docketing and Service Section Robert M. Lazo, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman, Atomic Safety and Washington, D.C. 20555 Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear' Regulatory Chairman, Maricopa County Commission Board of Supervisors Washington, D.C. 2035:.
111 South Third Avanue Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Dr. Dixon.Callahan Union Carbide Corporation Dr. Richcrd F. Cole P.O. Box Y Atcmic Safety and Licensing Board Oak Ridge,. Tennessee -37830 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Appeal Board Panel Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555.
Wasnington, D.C. 20555 -
Henry J. McGurren, Esq.
Bruce Meyerson, Esq. Office of the Executive Arizona Center for Law in Legal Director the Public Interest U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 112 North Fifth Avenue Cctmission Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Washington, D.C. 20555
~ ~ s ,.
W' g, &iL Charles A. B" choff '
[
b l
Attachment 5 Memorandum to Robert L. Brunton from Robert B. Steytler, P.E.
January 27, 1981 I
s
- t i m l TO nobert L. nrunton DATE Jan. 27, 19a1 s , Developr.ent Services !<anager J,
j % gap . F ML.. .... Rcbert B. Steytler, P.E.
I Assistant Director dastewater Operations SUBJECT TvrATMENT rix:T Find 3 FOR CALENDM YEM 1980 ;
i DTY Of PhCEF.'X -
. . l 4
Attached is the flow data that you had requested for the 91st Avenue Plant. They sect. Lo be in line with our earlier projectio:.s. ,
I for your in fo rma t ion , the flow at the 23rd Avenue Plant av :ragad
- 33. 79 'ND in 1980. !
4 7 ,
, 6/ d i F5bert B. Steper,P.E.
A:; s t . Dire tor Wastewater 0;..: rations .
PB5:ml ec: t h :< T . Palrre r ,
Jiri debb l
1 1
l l
l I
l l
l 1
/
I l
h.
r
, , V ,,% ll; Hoter t is. St.ny t te r, Auu' t Di rector DATE l-23-01 g , W.ite r ?. 'iewe r Dep t . , Ad:n t n t s t ra t ion Qu e FRCM k'eiine t h F. Spike r , Siiperintendent i Wautem,t er Colleetions r u. . ._._ .___. j ;
! ! SUBJECT MULTl-Ci h dASii.WAII.R FLOWS - 1960 i i i
i i
! { OIYGf f4GMX l
. ! I i
7 _
i ._ . . . . _ . . . . .
l'/80 NULII-ClfY FLOWS i
i 91Si AVE. WASTEWAIt'R TREAIMENT PLANI i -.c..-. .
..-...r__..._
f,I l Y .__ ._...___.__........-.._._
i
, _ (_ 'st lij A! I I. f iel ( cqj ; _
CORHLC lfl> FLOOl) FLO'.I (mqd) i
, Total 91st (18.4 6 92.4L Clendale 12.48 Younglo-ri 12.40
- fi . 21 0.21 T e'op e i3.02 Meca 8.02 l
, 11.80 11.80 Scot t ',da l e n.20 i
g.20 Phoent. ';h .1 e 47.76 i 51.70 i
)
I v ~.
. h. - Y Kennet h E./v . Sp iki r , So;mr t nt. ends nt Wan t e.-:a t e: Col'ectior.
I i, VES/dir i l
[
l i I i !
i 4 6
! t
+
i t !
i
, f
. ..,. . . ... 6
Attachment 6 Letter to Terry Hudgins , Aris:ona Public Service Company, from Robert B. Steytler, Assistant Director, City of Phoenix Wastewater Operations September 20, 1979
^
.L, . , .
{
GU,~,il
\/ '
Q ',; ; ij.? Q
- ~
WASTEWATER OPER AT:ONS September 20, 1979 i Mr. Terry Hudgins l Project Director Arizona Nuclear Power Project P. O. Box 21666-Station 1440 Phoenix, Arizona 85036
Dear Mr. Hudgins:
This is in response to a recent telephone request by Mr. Kent Storey for information regarding 1979 wastewater flows.
l j
Attached is a tabulation of actual recorded wastewater flows for the first six months of 1979 at both wastewater treatment I plants, and the anticipated total flow for the year 1979. I Also attached for your information is a revised projection of the amount of uncommitted effluent available by year from each plant through the year 2000, j
i This forecast of wastewater flows are straight line projections based on updated historic flow records. It is felt that this data is the most reliable indication of future flows that we-presently have available.
An additional 3,400 acre feet each year might be available i
from 1980 on if the City of Mesa should retire their treatment t plant from service at that time as planned, and thereafter i i divert their entire wastewater flow to the 91st Avenue Plant.
(
Mesa presently sends only about one-half of their flow to the 91st Avenue Plant. '
I I
l' Please give us a call if you have any questions or if you should need additional information.
. c Sincerely,
.m/ /l j .
Robert B. 6teytler
' Assis tant Director i Wastewater Operations
'i I RBS:dp Attachments e f 7/ '/
f
- T El.EPHONE KO2) 2G2 7@,1 &Y 125 E AST W ASHINGTON
. PHOENIX. ARIZONA 86004 i i
' September 19, _,,;
~
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA WATER AND SEWERS DEPARTMENT t WASTEWATER FLOW PROJECTIONS 1979-2000 ESTIMATED UNCOMMITTED EFFLUENT AVAILABLE, ACRE FEET / YEAR Year 23rd Avenue Plant 91st Avenue Plant Total Available
- 1979 37,000 59,400 96,400
}
1980 40,000 61,700 101,700 j
1981 40,000 67,000 107,000 1982 40,000 72,300 112,300 1983 40,000 77,500 117,500 1984 40,000 82,800 122,800 4
1985 40,000 88,100 128,100 1986 40,000 93,400 133,400
-1987 40,000 98,700 138,700 1988 40,000 ,
104,000 144,000 1989 .40,000 109,300- 149,300 1990 40,000 114,560 154,500 i
1991 40,000 119,800 159,800 40,000 125,100 165,100 1992
~
40,000 130,400 170,400 1993 40,000 135,700, 175,700 l 1994
\
~
40,000 141,000 181,000 1995 40,000 146,300 186,300 1996 ,
40,000 151,500 191,500 1997 40,000 156,800' 196,800
, 1998 40,000 162,100 202,100 1999' 40,000 167,400 207,400 2000
- First six months actual flows; last six months projected.
i
September 19, 1979 ,
, O CITY OF fl!OENIX, ARIZONA ~
WATER AND SEWERS DEPARTMENT
. I o
1979 Wastewater Flows - 1st 6 mo. Actual, 2nd 6 mo. Estimated 91st Avenue Plant 23rd Avenue Plant Total Acre Feet MG Acre Feet MG Acre Feet Month MG 8,626.34 855.82 2,b26.43 3,666.71 11,252.77 January 2,810.89 2,474.43 7,593.78 770.64 2,365.02 3,245.07 9,958.80 February 2,819.54 8,652.89 854.05 2,620.99 3,673.59 11,273.88 March 6,969.90 1,111.75 3,411.85 3,382.89 10,381.75 April 2,271.14 2,688.42 8,250.49 1,067.83 3,277.06 3,756.25 11,527.56 May 2,657.70 8,156.22 1,011.60 3,104.50 3,669.30 11,260.72 June 48,249.61 5,671.69 17,405.85 21,393.81 65,655.47 1st 6 mo. total 15,722.12 (1) 19,548.89 22,553.35 69,213.98 16,183.35 49,665.09 6,370.00 Last 6 mo. Estimated 31,905.47 97,914.70 12,041.69 36,954.74 43,947.16 134,869.45 1978 Estimated Total 38,500.00 38,500.00 '
Committed 59,414.70 36,954.74 96,369.44 59,400.00 37,000.00 96,400.00 Available to ANPP Note: (1) Based on historical ra tio of 1.0542:1
Attachment 7 Arthur Beard Engineers, Inc. and Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., City of Phoenix 23rd and 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plants Draf t Residuals Managemen't Facility Plan, Volume 5 - Phase C, Effluent Discharge Assessment (August 1980, Exhibit C, Effluent Flow Projections, Greeley and Hansen (January 1980)
. -. . __ . . = . = . - . . - - - ._ -
l 9
EXHIBIT C EFFLUENT FLOW PROJECTIONS GREELEY AND HANSEN JANUARY 1980 l
?
l l
2 i
e 1
S t
I
g, ,
TABLE C-1 PLANT EFFLUENT FLOW PROJECTIONS 23rd Avenue 91st Avenue Plant Effluent Flows, mgd_ Plant Effluent Flows, mgd dombined Effluent Flows, agd Weekly Monthly keekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily p Monthly Daily Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Month Average Minimum 1980 121.7 114.8 55.0 38.3 36.4 18.9 83.4 78.4 36.1 January 116.6 54.5 35.6 16.4 86.2 81.0 38.1 124.1 February 37.9 117.9 58.6 37.2 36.1 17.7 88.0 81.8 40.9 125.2 March 125.2 115.1 55.9 37.2 35.0 17.5 88.0 80.1 38.4 April 125.4 113.4 60.0 36.5 34.2 18.9 88.9 79.1 41.1 May 112.8 59.4 36.8 34.6 18.7 88.9 78.2 40.7 125.7 June 118.4 70.9 37.2 35.0 21.7 91.6 83.4 49.2 128.8 July 118.4 65.2 36 .1 34.3 20.6 93.4 84.1 44.6 129.5 j August 126.7 67.1 35.7 33.9 20.7 99.8 92.8 46.4 135.5 g September 132.0 120.9 65.7 t October 35.0 33.6 21.2 97.0 87.3 44.5 32.2 17.7 92.5 87.0 40.9 126.4 119.2 53.6 >
November 33.9 60.7 33.9 18.0 90.7 85.3 42.7 126.4 119.2 ;
December 35.7 (Continued)
\ ,
I
TABLE C-1 (Continued) -
9 w
23rd Avenue 91st Avenue
, _ Plant Effluent Flows, mgd Plant Effluent Flows, mgd Combined Effluent Flows, mgd Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Month Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum 1981 January 38.3 36.4 18.9 85.6 80.5 37.0 123.9 116.9 55.9 l' February 37.9 35.6 16.4 88.4 83.1 39.1 126.3 118.7 55.5 March 37.2 36.1 17.7 90.2 83.9 42.0 127.4 120.0 59.7 April 37.2 35.0 17.5 90.2 82.1 39.4 127.4 117.1 56.9 i May 36.5 34.2 18.9 91.1 81.1 42.2 127.6 115.3 61.1 June 36.8 34.6 18.7 91.1 80.2 41.7 127.9 114.8 60.4 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 93.9 85.4 50.4 131.1 120.4 72.1 August 36 .1 34.3 20.6 95.8 86.2 45.7 '131.9 120.5 66.3 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 102.3 95.1 47.6 138.0 129.0 68.3 October 35.0 33.6 21.2 99.5 89.6 45.7 134.5 123.2 66.9 November 33.9 32.2 17.7 94.9 89.2 41.9 128.8 121.4 59.6 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 93.0 87.4 43.7 128.7 121.3 61.7 1982 Janua ry 38.3 36.4 18.9 87.9 82.6 38.0 126.2 119.0 56.9 February 37.9 35.6 16.4 90.7 85.3 40.1 128.6 120.9 56.5 March 37.2 36.1 17.7 92.6 86.1 43.1 129.8 122.2 60.8 April 37.2 35.0 17.5 92.6 84.3 40.5 129.8 119.3 58.0 May 36.5 34.2 18.9 93.6 83.3 43.3 130.1 117.5 62'.2 .
June 36 .8 34.6 18.7 93.6 82.4 42.8 130.4 117.0 61.5 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 96.5 87.8 51.8 133.7 122.8 73.5 '
August 36.1 34.3 20.6 98.4 88.6 47.0 134.5 122.9 67.6 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 105.1 97.7 48.9 140.8 131.6 69.6 -
October 35.0 33.6 21.2 102.2 92.0 46.9 137.2 125.6 68.1 November 33.9 32.2 17.7 97.4 91.6 43.1 131.3 123.8 60.8 1 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 95.5 89.8 44.9 131.2 123.7 62.9 l (Continued) '
i e
/
. .. .... _.~. .,, - . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . .~ <
g ,
I
. TABLE C-1 (Continued) 23rd Avenue 91st Avenue Plant Effleunt Flows, mgd Plant Effluent Flows, agd Combined Effluent Flows, agd Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily .
Month Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum '
r 1983 January 38.3 36.4 18.9 90.2 84.8 39.0 128.5 121.2 57.9 February 37.9 35.6 16.4 93.1 87.5 41.1 131.0 123.1 57.5 March 37.2 36.1 17.7 95.1 88.4 44.2 132.3 124.5 61.9 April 37.2 35.0 17.5 95.1 86.5 41.5 132.3 121.5 59.0 May 36.5 34.2 18.9 96.0 85.4 44.4 132.5 119.7 63.3 -
June 36.8 34.6 18.7 96.0 84.5 43.9 132.8 119.1 62.6 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 99.0 90.1 53.2 1 36.2 125.1 74.9 August 36.1 34.3 20.6 100.9 90.8 48.1 137.0 125.1 68.7 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 107.8 100.3 50.2 143.5 134.2 70.8 October 35.0 33.6 21.2 104.9 94.4 48,1 139.9 128.0 69.3 Novmeber 33.9 32.2 17.7 100.0 94.0 44.2 133.9 126.2 61.9 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 98.0 92.1 46.1 133.7 126.0 64.1 1984 January 38.3 36.4 18.9 92.5 87.0 40.0 130.8 123.4 58.9 !
February 37.9 35.6 16.4 95.5 89.8 42.2 133.4 125.4 58.6 [
March 37.2 36.1 17.7 97.5 90.7 45.4 134.7 126.8 63.1 >
. April 37.2 35.0 17.5 97.5 88.7 42.6 134.7 123.7 60,1
, May 36.5 34.2 18.9 98.5 87.7 45.6 135.0 122.0 64.5 -
34.6- 18.7 98.5 86.7 45.1 135.3 121.3
~
June 36.8 63.8 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 101.5 92.4 54.5 138.7 127.4 76.2 ;
August 36.1 34.3 20.6 103.5 93.2 49.4 139.6 127.5 70.0 !
September 35.7 33.9 20.7 110.6 102.9 51.5 146.3 1 36.8 72.2 October 35.0 33.6 21.2 107.5 96.8 49.4 142.5 130.4 70.6 November 33.9 32.2 17.7 102.5 C6.4 45.3 136.4 128.6 63.0 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 100.5 94.5 47.3 136.2 128.4 65.3 (Continued) n de
TABLE C-1 (Continued) .
9 u
23rd Avenue 91st Avenue Plant Effluent Flows, mgd Plant Effluent Flows, mgd Combined Effluent Flows, mgd Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Monthly Weekly Daily Month Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum Average Minimum Minimum 1985 Jannary 38.3 36.4 18.9 94.7 89.0 40.9 133.0 125.4 59.8 February 37.9 35.6 16.4 97.8 91.9 43.2 135.7 127.5 59.6 March 37.2 36.1 17.7 99.8 92.8 46.4 137.0 128.9 64.1 Apri l 37.2 35.0 17.5 99.8 90.8 43.6 137.0 125.8 61.1 May 36.4 34.2 18.9 100.8 89.7 46.6 137.2 124.0 65.5 June 36.8 34.6 18.7 100.8 88.7 46.1 137.6 123.3 64.8 July 37.2 35.0 21.7 103.9 94.5 55.8 141.1 129.5 77.5 August 36.1 34.3 20.6 106.0 95.4 50.6 142.1 129.7 71.2 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 113.2 105.3 52.7 148.9 139.2 73.4 .I October 35.0 33.6 21.2 110.1 99.1 50.5 145.1 132.7 71.7 I November 33.9 32.2 17.7 105.0 98.7 46.4 138.9 130.9 64.1 1 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 102.9 96.7 48 4 138.6 130.6 66.4 l 1986 I
.lanua ry 38.3 36.4 18.9 96.6 90.8 41.8 134.9 127.2 60.7 fr February 37.9 35.6 16.4 99.8 93.8 44.1 137.7 129.4 60.5 '
March 37.2 36.1 17.7 101.9 94.8 47.4 139.1 130.9 65.1 l Ap ri l 37.2 35.0 17.5 101.9 92.7 44.5 139.1 127.7 62.0 i May 36.4 34.2 18.9 102.9 91.6 47.6 139.3 125.8 66.5 ;
Jane 36.8 34.6 18.7 102.9 90.6 47.1 139.7 125.2 65.8 I July 37.2 35.0 21.7 106.1 96.6 57.0 143.3 131.6 78.7 August 36.1 34.3 20.6 108.2 97.4 51.6 144.3 131.7 72.2 September 35.7 33.9 20.7 115.5 107.4 53.7 151.2 141.3 74.4 . ,
October 35.0 33.6 21.2 112.4 101.2 51.6 147.4 134.8 72.8 j November 33.9 32.2 17.7 107.1 100.7 47.3 141.0 132.9 65.0 December 35.7 33.9 18.0 105.0 98.7 49.4 140.7 132.6 67.4 i
1 l
C-5
- TABLE C-2 i
'ta o
EFFLUENT REUSE FLOW PROJECTIONS F
1 e
f ' Monthly Average Reuse Flow Projections, mgd Arizona Buckeye Arizona j
Game and Fish Irrigation Public d Month Department _ District Service Total d
i 1980 January 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 K
February 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 March 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 April 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 r;
26.8 33.3 j
May 6.5 6.5 26.8
- 33.3 June July 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 h,
August 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 September 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 October 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 November 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 December 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 l
j 1981 26.8 33.3 January 6.5 -
February 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 March 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 i April 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 May 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 June 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 July 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 August 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 i
September 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 l 26.8 33.3 i October 6.5 -
November 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 i 33.3 December 6.5 26.8 -
t (Continued)
.o
_ _- . . - w
- C-6 TABLE C-2 (Continued)
Monthly Average Reuse Flow Projections, mgd Arizona Buckeye Arizona Game and Fish Irrigation Public Month Department __ District Service Total 1982
~
January 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 February 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 March 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 April 6.5 . 26.8 -
33.3 May 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 June 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 July 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 August 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 September 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 October 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 .
.iovember 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 December 6.5 26.8 - 33.3 1983 January 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 February 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 March 6.5 26.8 -
33.3
. April 6.5 26.8 -
33.3 May- 6.5 26.8 22.1 55.4 June 6,5 26.8 23.4 56.7 July 6.5 26.8 23.1 56.4
' August 6.5 26.8 23.1 56.4 September 6.5 26.8 21.7 55.0 October 6.5 26.8 21.0 54.3 November
~
6.5 26.8 13.6 46.9 December 6.5 26.8 17.9 51.2 1984 January 6.5 26.8 13.1 46.4 February 6.5 26.8 13.4 46.7-March 6.5 26.8 19.5 52.8 April 6.5 26.8 20.1 53.4 May 6.5 26.8 44.2 77.5 June 6.5 26.8 46.8 80.1 July 6.5 26.8 46.2 79.5 August 6.5 26.8 46.2 79.5 September 6.5 26.8 43.4 76.7 October 6.5 26.8 42.0 75.3 November 6.5 26.8 27.2 60.5 December 6.5 26.8 35.8 69.1 (Continued) e 4.
o <-- . -
C-7 TABLE C-2 (Continued)
Monthly Average Reuse Flow Projections, mgd Arizona Suckeye Arizona Game and Fish Irrigation Public Month _ Department __ District Service Total 1985 January 6.5 26.8 26.2 59.5 February 6.5 26.8 25.6 58.9 March 6.5 26.8 39.0 72.3 April -
6.5 26.8 40.2 73.5 May 6.5 26.8 44.2 77.5 June 6.5 26.8 46.8 80.1 July 6.5 26.8 46.2 79.5 August 6.5 26.8 46.2 79.5 September 6.5 26.8 43.4 76.7 October 6.5
- 26.8 42.0 75.3 November 6.5 26.8 27.2 60.5 December 6.5 26.8 35.8 69.1 1986 (1987)
J anuary 6.5 26.8 26.2 39.5 59.5 February 6.5 26.8 25.6 40.2 58.9 March 6.5 26.8 39.0 58.5 72.3 April 6.5 26.8 40.2 60.3 73.5 May 6.5 26.8 66.3 - 99.6 June 6.5 26.8 70.2 - 103.5 July 6.5 26.8 69.3 - 102.6 August 6.5 26.8 69.3 - 102.6 September 6.5 26.8 65.1 - 98.4 October 6.5 26.8 63.0 - 96.3 November 6.5 26.8 40.8 - 74.1 December 6.5 26.3 53.7 - 87.0 I
d
_ _ _ _ , , _ _. ___._- _________w.._.---- -- -
- l
.c l l e. -
- r -
<w
~ *
/ g \
> - - =
- . I tu f' .
/- < - - 5!
, - - . g 1.- %
s,
=
y _
I ;
( - . m
, ) - -
J \ l \ ~ '
o a4 y
y it m /
) -
g- <
r
- - o
- - m
-1 = o. o A'% .
.= a
, 3 g - - u.
< ( - "
!; , ) =
g
( - -
=
-k _\ l \ =
~
- ij ' ,/ / 2 -
> ; - =
/ - -
[g1* < '-
s . ,
\ <- /, -
E I .i \ - "
\
4
[- 's - -
3, _ f,/ / - .
- > -4 -
pa
- f - .
Rj . <
.. ( ~ "
- 2 g : . : <. - - =
- I w - - -
E, ,
, . ( - -
hI g , g --
- 1
- < : - -
. : N : -
,( / 5 g' = - .
th',
/
3- ,
) 5 -
- .=
.1 si
( -
% j - ~
?! \ ( - g
'f , _ _ -
t*
/ t l h - h' l - ' -
,/ ( - .
1-
) - m
/ - .
I' ( s.'- (
,\
.- - =
r -,
( - .
. \
~ '
, f
) ~
' , ( - -
) - - e s' -
- 2 -
1 s -
1
. 2"
! l ! ! \ ! i l N I l e : : : : : : : :
.r. -
D38 '8013 :: _
r g
-- as.
-.-~--.%4.-r-- -A,.,,a ,m .--
.s-._
Y 4 } l I I #
= -*
l . - e G.
8 2*
i l N > '2 -
. cx w
)
i
/..
(
~
'$ g% "
5 -
", =.
=
S MM 4-C3 m
, ) _ ,
CD,
<Z
-- m W
~
_C3L5 I > - m 24 o
(s f** *"O C C3
/(
e oo E GC
, (
82
- < %w - =
- ~
I -
1 i :
N . 1 I
( f s o
- e i, / (
esma 44 i ,
_ =
l,)
i 4 l
g'
. i
{ ,a y -
=
e ess .4
~
- M
) * ,,
g l (, %
< - M i.
O k\ s s
3
- =
m
/ [ 2 $
I
/
) /
5
- =
< c - (
/
~ "
- ~ n
" /
g [' -
O A s 7
esaus
- _ S g
l
=. /
1 =
5 ( - .
= >
$, ~ '
/
l I esos S l :
. - )
~ "
I
( - M
/-) :>
-A
- - s' - -
S 1 ,
2 4 e 8'
S -4=
( ( \
l
/
I r - EB m#
- 6
[-
f eq
( m
.) _. . o
- N, -
- ~
h.
= .:
- . ')( - -
- =
i I( l ) i 31 i
- {
g g
e 8 "
e W W
= =_
W
. wM 938 *n013 e e
Attachment 8 Affidavit of William G. Bingham, dated January 11, 1982