|
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20082P0271991-08-28028 August 1991 Affidavit of RA Bernier.* Affidavit Stating That Licensee Response to Petitioner First Set of Interrogatories 3-6,8,9, 12-18 & 24 Are True & Correct.W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20070P8841991-03-19019 March 1991 Affidavit of Barbara Bush Re Issues Concerning Facility ML20070P8281991-03-15015 March 1991 Affidavit of C Estes Re Issues Concerning Facility ML20070Q0221991-03-0808 March 1991 Affidavit of Jt Stigner Re Issues Concerning Facility ML20070Q0321991-03-0808 March 1991 Affidavit of Le Kadish Re Issues Concerning Facility ML20079S1441984-01-19019 January 1984 Affidavit of Ae Scherer Requesting Proprietary CEN-267(V)-P Re Performance Evaluation of Control Element Assembly Shroud Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20080F5241983-11-10010 November 1983 Affidavit of Rd Gunderson Re Allegations Concerning Electrical Const Deficiencies.Related Info Encl ML20073J8841983-04-11011 April 1983 Affidavit of Rh Turner Re Use of Rept Analyzing Environ Effects of Seepage of Salt Water from Evaporation Ponds Into Aquifer Below Ponds.Rept Concluded Potential for Massive Environ Damage Existed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E0481982-04-19019 April 1982 Affidavit of Ee Van Brunt Re Pl Hourihan 820407 Motion for Order Requiring Admission.Assumption & Use of 95% Capacity Factor Which Is Conservative for Eias,Not Conservative for Other Purposes.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040E3571982-01-28028 January 1982 Affidavit of AA Weinstein Re Contention 7.Decommissioning of Facility Discussed.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20040C3641982-01-15015 January 1982 Affidavit of AC Rogers Re Containment Base Mat.Concrete Slump Test Performed Per ASTM C-143.Measurements Accurate to 1/4-inch,2 F & 10 Psi.Resume Encl ML20040C3681982-01-15015 January 1982 Affidavit of Ja Roedel Re Facility,Qa/Qc Programs for Concrete Placement.Resume & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040C0471982-01-13013 January 1982 Affidavit of FW Hartley Re Contention 6B.Joint Applicants Have Committed to Meet NRC Procedural Requirements Which Will Serve as Acceptable Basis for Operation Pending Mods. W/Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc ML20040C2951982-01-12012 January 1982 Affidavit of Rd Hulse Re Contention 5,availability of Cooling Water for Unit 3 for Purposes of Determining Whether Effluent to Be Discharged from 91st Ave Plant Will Be Adequate.Epa Projections Are Most Conservative ML20040C2991982-01-12012 January 1982 Affidavit of J Muir,Director of Wastewater Util,Tolleson, Az,Re Contention 5,availability of Coolant Water for Unit 3. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040C2981982-01-11011 January 1982 Affidavit of Wg Bingham Re Contention 5,availability of Coolant Water for Unit 3 ML17297A5881981-07-20020 July 1981 Affidavit Supporting Intervenor 810626 Answers to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl 1991-08-28
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20217E1551999-09-28028 September 1999 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirement for Licensees to Revise ISI & IST Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME B&PV Code ML17313B0651999-07-30030 July 1999 Comment on Draft Rg DG-1076, Service Level I,Ii & III Protective Coatings Applied to Npps. ML17313B0161999-07-0101 July 1999 Comment on Draft Rg DG-1074, SG Tube Integrity. ML20196K5631999-06-29029 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55a Re Elimination of 120-month Requirement to Update ASME Code ISI & Inservice Testing Program ML20207D1591999-05-20020 May 1999 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR21,50 & 54 Re Use of Alternative Source Terms at Operating Reactors ML17313A9791999-05-20020 May 1999 Comment Opposing Draft Reg Guide DG-1084, Qualification & Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants. as General Comment,Util Believes That Many of Proposed Changes Will Limit Ability to cross-train Mgt Level Personnel ML20205A4271999-03-18018 March 1999 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-64 Which Requested Greater Clarification by NRC Re Possible Financial Obligations of NPP Licensees as Reflected in NRC Final Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation ML17313A8521999-03-0505 March 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Change to NRC Enforcement Policy.Suggested Rewording of Sections Provided ML17313A8191999-02-24024 February 1999 Comment Supporting Secy 99-007, Recommendation for Reactor Oversight Process Improvements, & Comments Provided by NEI & Regional Utility Group Iv.Offers Comments on NRC Approach to Using Performance Indicators in Assessment Process ML20198J4031998-12-11011 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirement for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at NPPs ML20217B9761998-04-0909 April 1998 Comment Re Draft RG DG-1029, Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic & Radio-Frequency Interference in Safey-Related Instrumentation & Control Sys ML20216A9091998-04-0303 April 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.55a Re Industry Codes & Stds ML17313A3361998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed GL Re Lab Testing on Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal. Believes That Proposed 60 Day Implementation Schedule Would Severely Challenge Resources of Limited Number of Qualified Vendors ML20217E8781998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed GL, Lab Testing of Nuclear- Grade Activated Charcoal ML17313A2511998-03-0303 March 1998 Comment on Proposed GL 98-XX Re Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. ML20203L5521998-02-25025 February 1998 Forwards Comments on Draft Reg Guide DG-5008, Reporting of Safeguards Events ML20202E4251998-01-30030 January 1998 Comment on Draft RG DG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in Npps. Draft RG Should Be Revised to Clarify That Alloy Analyzer Can Be Used Consistent W/Guidance in EPRI NP-5652 ML20199E0871998-01-17017 January 1998 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by Pg Crane Re Amending Emergency Planning Regulations to Require Consideration of Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public ML20202G4461997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Proposed Final Rule 10CFR50.Licensee Requests That Effective Date Be Delayed from 980101 to 0601,in Order to Provide Enough Time to Request & Obtain NRC Review of Exemption from Rule ML20212D1391997-10-17017 October 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR55 Re NUREG-1021,Interim Rev 8, Operator Licensing Exam Stds for Power Reactors ML17312B4241997-04-23023 April 1997 Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1068 (Proposed Rev 3 to Rg 1.134, Medical Evaluation of Licensing Personnel at Npps) ML20134J9671997-02-0606 February 1997 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20134N2521996-11-14014 November 1996 Comment on Draft RG DG-1012,proposed Rev 3 to RG 1.8, Qualification & Training of Personnel for Npp ML20117E3871996-08-0707 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20113C6981996-06-24024 June 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Cautions NRC Not to Adopt Rules That Are Too Restrictive & Could Lead to Premature Decommissioning ML20117P1261996-06-24024 June 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Urges NRC to Approach Rulemaking Re Decommissioning Costs in Manner That Will Facilitate Federal Legislative Solution ML20095A8461995-11-28028 November 1995 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-62 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.54.Util Endorses Industry Petition & Response Provided by NEI ML17311B2931995-11-27027 November 1995 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG/CR-6354, Performance Testing of Electronic Personnel Dosimeters. ML17311B1601995-08-31031 August 1995 Comment Opposing Review of Revised NRC SALP ML20087H7241995-08-16016 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Comment on Revision of NRC Enforcement Policy ML20087H7501995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification for ABWR Design & Std Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087H7331995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR Design & Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design.Concurs w/ABB-CE Comments & NEI Recommendations ML17311B0071995-06-27027 June 1995 Comment on Proposed Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style. Insp Detail Should Be Brief & Ref Previous Rept by Section or at Min IR Number ML20083N5031995-05-0505 May 1995 Comment on Proposed Rev to 10CFR50,app J, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors. Proposed Rev Will Result in Highly Efficient Regulation ML20082P7461995-04-19019 April 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Proposed Revs of NRC Fee Schedule for FY95 in Fr ML20082H0971995-04-10010 April 1995 Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Nuclear Industry to Raise Safety Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation ML20081B5721995-03-0808 March 1995 Motion of Plains Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative,Inc to Withdraw,W/Prejudice,Petition for Leave to Intervene,Request for Finding of Significant Change & for Antitrust Hearing & Comments.* W/Certificate of Svc ML17311A6691995-02-0202 February 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-8014 (Proposed Rev 3 to Rg 8.13, Instruction Concerning Prenatal Radiation Exposure) ML20078H0671995-01-20020 January 1995 Comment Supporting NUMARC Position on Proposed Rules 10CFR20,30,40,50,51,70 & 72 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning of Lands & Structures ML20077M5471995-01-0404 January 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & low-power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactor Proposed Rule ML17311A2461994-08-25025 August 1994 Comment on Draft Reg Guide (DG-1031), Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Term Maint Preventable Failure Needs to Be Defined & Compared to Term Maint Preventable Functional Failure. ML17310B1911994-04-12012 April 1994 Petition to Intervene of Public Utility Commission of Texas. W/Certificate of Svc ML17310B2041994-04-12012 April 1994 Petition to Intervene of Public Utility Commission of Tx ML20062M4141993-12-27027 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Procurement of Commercial Grade Items ML20056G3351993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process ML17306B2461993-01-15015 January 1993 Comment Supporting in Part,Draft Reg Guide DG-1020, Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. ML17306A9571992-09-0808 September 1992 Comments on Proposed Rev to Staff Technical Position on Radwaste Classification.Supports Rev ML20099E0621992-07-29029 July 1992 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.63, Loss of All AC Power ML20090F9661992-03-0909 March 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 52 Re Training & Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel ML17306A4501992-02-0404 February 1992 Comment on Draft Reg Guide Task DG-8007 (Proposed Rev 1 to Reg Guide 8.7) Re Instructions for Recording & Reporting Occupational Radiation Exposure Data 1999-09-28
[Table view] |
Text
. . ..
f R ,
AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 2.790 Combustion Engineering, Inc. )
State of Connecticut )
County of Hartford ) SS.:
I, A. E. Scherer, depose and say that I an the Director, Nuclear Licensing, of Combustion Engineering, Inc., duly authorized to make this affidavit, and have reviewed or caused to have reviewed the infurnation which is identified as proprietary and referenced in the paragraph immediately below. I am submitting this affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations and in conjunction with the construction permit of
- Arizona Public Service, for withholding this information.
The information for which proprietary treatment is sought is contained in the following document:
CEN-267(V)-P, Interin Report on the Performance Evaluation of the Palo Verde Control Element Assembly Shroud, January,1984.
This document has been appropriately designated as proprietary.
I have. personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by Conbustion Engineering in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.
Pursuant- to the provisions of paragraph (b) (4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure, included in the above referenced document, should be withheld,
~
8402030222 840120 PDR ADOCK 05000528 s PDR m
A .
- 1. The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure are the experimental data from the Palo Verde 1 Comprehensive Vibration Assessnent Program (CVAP) and other associated laboratory tests, detailed design data, and analytical results for the Control Element Assembly (CEA) shroud, which is owned and has been held in confidence by Combustion Engineering.
- 2. The information consists of test data or other similar data concerning a process, method or component, the application of which results in a substantial competitive advantage to Combustion Engineering.
- 3. The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Combustion Engineering and not customarily disclosed to the public. Combustion Engineering has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The details of the aforementioned system were provided to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission via letter DP-537 from F.M. Stern to Frank Schroeder dated December 2, 1974- , This system was applied in determining that the subject document herein are proprietary.
-4. The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence under the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 with the understanding that it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
- 5. The information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, is not available in public sources, and any disclosure to thira parties has been nade pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence. .
- 6. Public disclosure of the information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Conbustion Engineering because:
w
- a. A similar product is manufactured and sold by major pressurized water reactor competitors of Combustion Engineering.
- b. Development of this information by C-E required thousands of manhours of effort and hundreds of thousands of dellars. To the best of my knowledge and belief a competitor would have to ondergo similar expense in generating equivalent 1nformation.
- c. In order to acquire such infornation, a competitor would also require considerable time and inconvenience related to the detailed design, testing, and analysis for the Control Element Assembly shroud.
- d. The information required significant ef, fort and expense to obtain the licensing approvals necessary for application of the information.
Avoidance of this expense would decrease a competitor's cost in applying the information and marketing the product to which the information is applicable,
- e. The information consists of experienental data and the associated laboratory tests, detailed design data, and analytical results for vibration testing of the Control Element Assembly (CEA) shroud at Palo Verde 1, the
, application of which provides a competitive economic advantage. The availability of such information to competitors would enable them to modify their product to better compete with Combustion Engineering, take marketing or other actions to improve their product's position or impair the position of Combustion Engineering's product, and avoid developing similar data and analyses in support of their processes, methods or apparatus.
- f. In pricing Combustion Engineering's products and services, significant research, development, engineering, analytical, manufacturing, .
licensing, quality assurance and other costs and expenses nust be included.
The ability of Combustion Engineering's competitors to utilize such information
- e. .
- s _' ; ,
without similar expenditure of resources may enable them to sell at prices reflecting significantly lower costs.
- g. Use of the information by competitors in the international marketplace would increase their ability to market nuclear steam supply systems by reducing the costs associated with their technology development. In addition, disclosure would have an adverse economic impact on Combustion Engineering's potential for obtaining or maintaining foreign licensees.
Further the deponent sayeth not, n~4a A. E. efhe7lr ' ~ ~
~~
Director Nuclear Licensing Sworn to before me this N " day of cniocuQ , 10 l.
i,"I h (chc M _
.. y 10
\ hot.ary Public V
%.5;tqp , :<.. ':r , , . . . . . .,
- < t , p? 1
. . $/[b ' r,'.' D ~ ..w.. s., .;J l
1 L