ML19030A933

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:44, 5 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Part 08 Enclosures (Rev. 2) - Part 08 - Enclosures - Subsurface Data Report - Appendix D.1 - Pages 17-32
ML19030A933
Person / Time
Site: Clinch River
Issue date: 01/18/2019
From: James Shea
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Office of New Reactors
Fetter A
References
TVACLINCHRIVERESP, TVACLINCHRIVERESP.SUBMISSION.6, CRN.P.PART08, CRN.P.PART08.2
Download: ML19030A933 (16)
v • d • e


Text

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No. 6468131072 6 CONCLUSIONS A seismic refraction survey was conducted in Oak Ridge, Tennessee at the Clinch River SMR Project site. The purpose of the survey was to map bedrock depth and velocity structure beneath six (6) P-wave seismic refraction lines at locations selected by Bechtel and AMEC E&I. The locations of the seismic lines, designated SRS-1 through SRS-6, and nearby boreholes are presented in Figure 1.

The interpreted seismic bedrock interface at 7,000 ft/s contour in each seismic tomography model was chosen to agree acceptably with existing borehole data for bedrock. This interface typically only differs from borehole data in areas with thicker sections of weathering, or where velocities are changing, or sections with possible saturated soils.

Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 15 of30 February 28,2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-17 of 32 RCN: CRP-1107.1 Page 15 of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No. 6468131072 7 REFERENCES Dobrin, M.S., and Savit, J., 1988, Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting, McGraw-Hill Co., New York.

Gardner, L.W., 1967, Refraction seismograph profile interpretation, in Musgrave, AW., ed., Seismic Refraction Prospecting: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, p. 338-347.

Hagedoom, J.G., 1959, The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections, Geophysical Prospecting, v. 7, p 158-182.

Hales, F. W., 1958, An accurate graphical method for interpreting seismic refraction lines, Geophysical Prospecting, v. 6, p 285-294.

Hawkins, L. V., 1961, The reciprocal method of routine shallow seismic refraction investigation, Geophysics, v. 26, p. 806-819.

Kassenaar, J.D. C., 1989-1992, VIEWSEIS seismic refraction analysis system, installation manual, program tutorial, reference manual, 50 p.

Lankston, R. W., 1990, High-resolution refraction seismic data acquisition and interpretation, in Ward, S. H., ed., Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Volume 1: Review and Tutorial:

Society ofExploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, p. 45-74.

Lankston, R. W., and Lankston, M. M., 1986, Obtaining multilayer reciprocal times through phantoming: Geophysics, v. 51, p. 45-49.

Palmer, D., 1980, The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation: Society of Exploration Geophysics, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 104 p.

Palmer, D., 1981, An introduction to the field of seismic refraction interpretation: Geophysics, v. 46, p.

1508-1518.

Redpath, B. B., 1973, Seismic refraction exploration for engineering site investigations: U. S. Army Engineer Waterway Experiment Station Explosive Excavation Research Laboratory, Livermore, California, Technical Report E-73-4, 51 p.

Rockwell, D.W., 1967, General Wavefront Method, in Musgrave, AW., ed., Seismic Refraction Prospecting: Society ofExploration Geophysicists, p. 363-415.

Scheidegger, A, and Willmore, P.L., 1957, The use of a least square method for the interpretation of data from seismic surveys, Geophysics, v. 22, p. 9-22.

Schuster, G. T. and Quintus-Bosz, A, 1993, Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: Theory:

Geophysics, v. 58, no. 9, p. 1314-1323.

Telford, W. M., Geldart, L.P., Sheriff, R.E., 1990, Applied Geophysics, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press.

Wyrobek, S.M., 1956, Application of delay and intercept times in the interpretation of multilayer time distance curves, Geophysical Prospecting, v. 4, p 112-130.

Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 16 of30 February 28,2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-18 of 32 RCN: CRP-1107.1 Page 16 of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No. 6468131072 Zhang, J. and Toksoz, M. N., 1998, Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography, Geophysics, V. 63, p.

1726-1737.

Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 17 of30 February 28,2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-19 of 32 RCN: CRP-1107.1 Page 17 of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No. 6468131072 8 CERTIFICATION All geophysical data, analysis, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations in this document have been prepared under the supervision of and reviewed by a GEO Vision California Professional Geophysicist and a GEO Vision California Professional Engineer.

Prepared by 02/28/14 William Dalrymple Date California Professional Geophysicist, P.Gp. 1072 GEO Vision Geophysical Services, Inc.

Reviewed by 02/28/14 Date essional Engineer, P.E. 30362 eophysical Services, Inc.

  • This geophysical investigation was conducted under the supervision of a California Professional Geophysicist and a California Professional Engineer using industry standard methods and equipment. A high degree of professionalism was maintained during all aspects of the project from the field investigation and data acquisition, through data processing interpretation and reporting. All original field data files, field notes and observations, and other pertinent information are maintained in the project files and are available for the client to review for a period of at least one year.

A professional geophysicist's and a professional engineer's certification of interpreted geophysical conditions comprises a declaration of his/her professional judgment. It does not constitute a warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, nor does it relieve any other party of its responsibility to abide by contract documents, applicable codes, standards, regulations or ordinances.

Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 18 of30 February 28,2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-20 of 32 RCN: CRP-1107.1 Page 18 of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No. 6468131072 TABLES Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 19 of30 February 28,2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-21 of 32 RCN: CRP-1107.1 Page 19 of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No. 6468131072 Table 1 Seismic Line Geometry Geophone NAVD88 Spacing Easting Northing Line Endpoints Elevation (ft) (US Feet) (US Feet)

(ft) (ft) 0 2,448,238.1 570,478.0 804.4 1 12.5 587.5 2,448,008.3 571,018.7 810.2 0 2,448,337.1 570,729.1 808.1 2 10 470 2,448,152.9 571,161.5 810.9 0 2,448,507.9 569,842.1 795.0 3 12.5 587.5 2,448,277.8 570,382.6 802.8 0 2,448,644.7 569,899.9 792.8 4 12.5 587.5 2,448,415.1 570,440.7 800.9 0 2,447,999.1 570,440.0 807.9 5 12.5 587.5 2,448,435.0 570,833.9 810.9 0 2,447,403.0 570,381.1 768.3 6 12.5 587.5 2,447,733.2 570,867.0 776.7 Notes:

1. End point coordinates interpolated from provided AMEC survey points, if not coincident.
2. Coordinates in TN State Plane, NAD83, US Survey Feet.

Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 20 of30 February 28,2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-22 of 32 RCN: CRP-1107.1 Page20of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No. 6468131072 Table 2 AMEC Selected Asbuilt Borehole Locations NAVD88 Description Easting (US Feet) Northing (US Feet)

Elevation (ft)

MP-101 2,448,355.2 570,249.6 800.5 MP-102 2,448,404.3 570,097.9 797.9 MP-103 2,448,367.5 570,287.2 800.6 MP-104 2,448,449.1 570,093.9 797.7 MP-105 2,448,343.5 570,210.2 800.2 MP-106 2,448,377.2 570,136.4 798.7 MP-107 2,448,284.8 570,291.6 801.6 MP-108 2,448,376.3 570,051.7 798.5 MP-110 2,448,403.3 570,190.7 798.7 MP-111 2,448,345.0 570,328.7 801.1 MP-111PS 2,448,334.2 570,345.7 801.6 MP-111UD 2,448,326.4 570,356.0 801.7 MP-112 2,448,472.1 570,261.9 799.2 MP-113 2,448,486.5 570,184.9 797.5 MP-114 2,448,464.6 570,052.5 797.2 MP-115 2,448,562.0 570,094.9 796.9 MP-116 2,448,560.2 570,202.4 797.6 MP-117 2,448,520.2 570,296.0 800.0 MP-118 2,448,445.5 570,370.9 799.8 MP-202 2,448,050.0 570,922.1 811.8 MP-204 2,448,097.0 570,921.7 812.0 MP-206 2,448,025.6 570,964.0 811.8 MP-208 2,448,024.1 570,880.5 811.9 MP-210 2,448,051.2 571,019.3 807.7 MP-214 2,448,110.8 570,881.2 779.8 MP-215 2,448,210.7 570,924.5 813.4 MP-216 2,448,209.1 571,031.0 813.4 MP-409 2,448,158.9 570,584.3 807.0 MP-410 2,448,368.8 570,774.2 809.4 MP-429 2,448,591.1 569,975.5 796.0 Notes:

1. Survey coordinates provided by AMEC Environment and Infrastructure.
2. Coordinates in TN State Plane, NAD83, US Survey Feet.

Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 21 of 30 February 28, 2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-23 of 32 RCN: CRP-1107.1 Page 21 of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No. 6468131072 FIGURES Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 22 of30 February 28,2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-24 of 32 RCN: CRP-1107.1 Page22of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Pro*ect AMEC Pro*ect No. 6468131072 2447500 2448000 2448500 0 0 0 0 0

0 It) ""

It) 0 0 0 0 It) It) 0 0 It) ""

It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 It) ""

It) 2447500 2448000 2448500 100 200 300 Fee t Legend o Borehole Locations FIGURE 1

- Seismic Refraction Line SITE MAP Date: 2/28/2014 CLINCH RIVER SMR PROJECT SITE GV Project: 13162 NOTES:

OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE Developed by: WDalrymple

1. Tennessee State Plane Coordinate System, NAD 83, FIPS 4100, US Survey Feet
2. Image Source: Esri, DigitaiGiobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Drawn by: T Rodriguez PREPARED FOR Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community Approved by: A Martin AMEC ENVIRONMENT
3. Surveyed locations provided by AMEC Environment and Infrastructure File Name: 13162-1.MXD & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.

Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 23 of30 February 28, 2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-25 of 32 RCN : CRP-1107.1 Page23of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastructure Clinch River SMR Pro*ect AMEC Pro*ect No. 6468131072 Seismic Data Acquisition System Typical Seismic Line 220 lb Truck Mounted AWD a E(S)Jiston geophysical services FIGURE 2 PHOTOGRAPHS OF SEISMIC EQUIPMENT CLINCH RIVER SMR PROJECT OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.

Geovision Report 13162-01 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 24 of 30 February 28, 2014 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page 0.1-26 of 32 RCN: CRP-1107.1 Page24of30

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastruct ure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No . 6468131072 s N

~.,

~

c:

0

  • ~

iiJ Contour Interval: 1,000 fils Distance (Feet) 600 1:200 1800 :2400 3100 3700 4300 5000 5600 l!iiOO 69Do 7SOO 8100 3800 9400 10000 10700 11 J00 11900 121600 13:200 1J900 P*Wave Velocity (IUs)

LEGEND

.,. Geophone Location SRS-5 Line Intersection

~~z ' Bore hole Intersection

-~ Figure 3

.2",. . Wealhered Rock and Competent Rock Interpreta tions ~! Seismic Tomography Model: SRS-1

- '" from AMEC E&l Borehole Logs

    • ~~-~q Interpreted Seismic Bedrock lnteoiace 50 ,,. ,,. ~-~ _______:G:.;V:....:..P:;ro2je::;c::I:.:N.::o::*:.:1.:3.:.16::2: __ _ __ _-ll 1

~~ Clinch Rilooer SMR Project Sile r ~ ~------~O=*~<.:_R~i~ ~**~T~e~nn~e~~

=:~-------1 !

Nota: BorehOle intai'$E!'(:tion:s. .an;! pr~:s.ented if le:s.s thi;ln 50 feel lrom the lina- .._, Prepared for AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

Geovision Report 13162-D1 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 25 of30 February28,2014 RCN CRP-1107 .1 Page 25 of30 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page D.1-27 of 32

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastruct ure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No. 6468131072 s N c:

.2

~.,

m Contour Interval: 1,000 fils Distance (Feet)

BOO 1200 1800 2400 3 100 3700 .t300 5000 5600 6200 6900 7500 B100 8800 9400 10000 10700 11300 11'900 12600 13200 J3900 P-Wave Vel ocity (fils)

LEGEND

'Y Geophone Location SRS-5 Line Intersection T

P:"1~ ~r 0

Borehole Intersection Figure 4

..2".,. Weathered Rock and Competent Rock Interpretations

_ ., from AMEC E&l Borehole Logs

~

-~

o:-; ~ Seismic Tomography Model: SRS-2

~1. GV Project No. 13162 t

Interpreted Seismic Bedrock Interface -~--~~~~----~1

~

                  • ~ 25 ..

" 1110 Cl1t\Ch River SMR Fl'ro;ect Site Oak Ridge. Tennessee

~., Borehole inlorsectioos are pra<onled il loss lhan 50 Ieel lrom lho line.

r~~--~==~~--~1

'-' Prepared for AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

Geovision Report 13162-D1 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 26 of30 February28,2014 RCN CRP-1107 .1 Page 26 of30 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page D.1-28 of 32

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastruct ure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No . 6468131072 s N

~.,

~

c 0

-~

iJj Contour Interval : 1,000 fVs Distance (Feet) 800 1200 1800 2400 3100 3700 .4JO(I 5000 5600 6200 0900 7500 81 00 8800 9400 10000 10700 11 300 11900 12600 13200 13900 P-Wave Velocity (ft/s)

LEGEND y Geophone Location

~*!i s*

4 Borehole Intersection 2- "

- Weathe red Rock and Competent Rock Interpretations from AMEC E& l Borehole Logs

~ Figure 5

                      • Interpreted Seismic Bedrock Interface ili-------C..:Ii:nch 11

~ ~ I-----S-el_s_m_lc-G-~-o-~.:.,~..:fE:.::r::.~::~..:M:.-~d-:-~-,-=s:-::R:-:s:-.-:: - --11

.:..:_R.:.;i~Y e~r~S:.M:.:R~P;_ro.:.je:.c:t:.S:.:i:le.-------ll

,~t i-------~O~a~k.:.RID9= * ~**~T..:*~nn=*=~==~----~--ll Not9: Borehole intersacrions. ara pres.&nted .rless than 50 feel from the line. vl Prepared for AMEC Environment & Infrastructure. Inc.

Geovision Report 13162-D1 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 27 of30 February28,2014 RCN CRP-1107 .1 Page 27 of30 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page D.1-29 of 32

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastruct ure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No . 6468131072 s N Q) c:

.!l

~Q) w Con tour Interval : 1,000 ft/s Distance (Fee t) 800 1200 1800 2-'00 JIOO 3700 4300 5000 5600 6200 6900 7500 6100 &800 9400 10000 10700 11JOO 11900 12600 13:200 1390o P-Wave Velocity (ft/s)

LEGEND

., Geophone Location

~~~s- Borehole lntersecUon -~ Figure 6

_2",.. Weathered Rock and Competent Rock Interpretations  ;.,_~*i Seismic Tomography Model: SRS-4

_ ,. from AMEC E& l Borehole Logs

,, ~

~~~----~~~~----~ 1 GV Project No. 13162

........... Inte rpreted Seismic Bedrock Interface

" " '"' ~ i Clinch River SMR. Ptoject Stle r~} ~------------~O~*~*~R~~~**~T~*~nn~*~~==---------------1l Note; Sorehole intersections are pres.enle<l if less than 50 feet rrom the line. '-" [ Prepared for AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

Geovision Report 13162-D1 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 28 of30 February28,2014 RCN CRP-1107 .1 Page 28 of30 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page D.1-30 of 32

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastruct ure Clinch River SMR Project AMEC Project No . 6468131072 w E Con tour Interval: 1,000 1!/s Distance (Feet) 800 1200 1800 2-'00 JIOO 3700 4300 5000 5600 6200 6900 7500 6100 &800 9400 10000 10700 11JOO 11900 12600 13:200 1390o P-Wave Velocity (ftls)

LEGEND

.,. Geophone Location SRS-2 Line Intersection T

~""'*o~* Bore hole lnlersecllon

~ Figure 7

.,2".. Weathered Rock and Competent Rock Interpretations -~

- "' from AMEC E& l Bore hole Logs "'"~ Seismic Tomography Model: SRS-5

........... Interpreted Seismic Bedrock Interface ~ ~ ~--------~=G~V~P~ro~je~c~t~N~o~.1~3~1~62~--------~l

'"' "' ~~ Clinch River SMR. Ptoject Stle

~ ~------------~O~*~*~R~~~*-~T~o~nn~*=~==~--------~---il Note: Socehole Intersections are J)Te5Einled if less than 50 feel rrom the line. '-' Prepared for AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

Geovision Report 13162-D1 Clinch River Refraction Geophysics Rev 2 Page 29 of30 February28,2014 RCN CRP-1107 .1 Page 29 of30 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page D.1-31 of 32

AMEC Envirnment & Infrastruct ure w E Contour Interval; 1,000 fils Distance (Feet) 800 1200 1800 2"00 5;100 3700 AJOO 5000 5600 6200 6900 7500 8100 8800 9400 10000 10700 11 300 11900 12600 1:3200 13900 P-Wave Velocity (ftls)

LEGEND

"' Geophone Location -~ Figure 8

-~........ Interp reted Seismic Bed rock lnterface

'-~

~ i~ 1----- S-el_s_m_lc..::.;

GV T:o:. . Project m:.:

. . o:!g::ra:.:p~h.::No.

y:.:M..:..:

od.:.e::l:._s_R_s_ - - --ll 13162

,,. ~] Clinl;h RiYer SMR Projec;t Sile

" " 100

, ~t l--------------~0.~k_:R:,:id~9~e,~T~e~nn:,:e~s=see=---------------il Nole: Borehole interseclions a re presented ir less than 50 feet from the line. '-' £ Prepared for AMEC Env/ronmenl & lnfraslruclure, Inc.

RCN CRP-1107 .1 Page 30 of30 Clinch River Data Report Rev. 4 CRP-1112.16 Page D.1-32 of 32

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19030A933&oldid=2524936"