ML19276D423

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:15, 1 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Limited Appearance Statement from Philip Hurzeler Regarding the Seabrook Station Unit 1 License Amendment Application
ML19276D423
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/02/2019
From: Hurzeler P
- No Known Affiliation
To: Mattison M
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY/RAS
References
Download: ML19276D423 (1)


Text

From: Philip Hurzeler To: Mattison, Molly Cc: natalie@c-10.org

Subject:

[External_Sender] Docket No. 50-443-LA-2; ASLBP No. 17-953-02-LA-BD01 Date: Wednesday, October 02, 2019 3:55:50 PM Comments submitted by Philip Hurzeler regarding Docket No. 50-443-LA-2; ASLBP No. 17-953-02-LA-BD01 What are the downside risks of a wrong decision? Risk == Consequences

  • Probability If the license is withdrawn the consequences are:

Electricity would have to be obtained elsewhere, possibly from fossil fuels Electricity would be more expensive Reliability of electrical power may suffer NextEra would suffer financially

If the license is continued, the consequences could be:

Hundreds of people dying All the problems of Fukushima So, the consequences are lopsided. The probabilities are lopsided the opposite way: 100% vs.

an estimated 0.001%.

This means that a decision to continue the license would be tantamount to valuing the lives of 100's of people only about a thousand times more than cheaper power. A bad deal!

An additional comment: Dr. Mtingwa recognized that the 20 year extension was of particular surprise and concern to local residents.

I am further concerned that although direct safety issues were addressed, the additional impact of waste disposal problems may not have been adequately addressed in the 20 year extension.

Philip Hurzeler PhD.

~Philip Philip Hurzeler 978-465-0697 ph@computer.org