ML082200032

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:16, 14 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Request for Additional Information, on License Renewal Application Sections 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 & 2.5
ML082200032
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/22/2008
From: Jay Robinson
License Renewal Projects Branch 1
To: Gallagher M
AmerGen Energy Co, Exelon Corp
Robinson, J NRR/DLR/RPB1 415-2878
References
TAC MD7701
Download: ML082200032 (12)


Text

August 22, 2008 Mr. Michael P. Gallagher Vice President License Renewal Projects AmerGen Energy Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR SECTIONS 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, &

2.5 OF THE THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC NO. MD7701)

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

By letter dated January 8, 2008, AmerGen Energy Company, LLC (AmerGen) submitted an application pursuant to 10 CFR Part 54 to renew the operating license for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 for review by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff). The staff is reviewing the information contained in the license renewal application and has identified, in the enclosure, areas where additional information is needed to complete the review. Further requests for additional information may be issued in the future.

Items in the enclosure were discussed with Chris Wilson, of your staff, and a mutually agreeable date for the response is within 30 days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-2878 or e-mail Jay.Robinson@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Jay Robinson, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-289

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: See next page

ML082200032 * = concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA:DLR OGC DRA:AFPB DE:EMCB DE:EEEB PM:DLR:RPB1 BC:DLR:RPB1 NAME SFigueroa BMizuno AKlein KManoly GWilson JRobinson DPelton DATE 8/17/08 06/17/08 8/20/08 8/18/08 8/18/08 8/20/08 8/22/08

Letter to AmerGen Energy Company, LLC from J. Robinson dated August 22, 2008 DISTRIBUTION:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR SECTIONS 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, &

2.5 OF THE THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC NO. MD7701)

HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlrRpb1 RidsNrrDlrRpb2 RdsNrrDlrRer1 RidsNrrDlrRer2 RidsNrrDeEmcb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDraAfpb RidsOgcMailCenter


SLopas NIqbal BTitus FFarzam KMiller

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 cc:

Site Vice President - Three Mile Island Director Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Bureau of Radiation Protection AmerGen Energy Company, LLC Pennsylvania Department of P. O. Box 480 Environmental Protection Middletown, PA 17057 Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 8469 Senior Vice President - Operations, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 Mid-Atlantic AmerGen Energy Company, LLC Plant Manager - Three Mile Island Nuclear 200 Exelon Way, KSA 3-N Station, Unit 1 Kennett Square, PA 19348 AmerGen Energy Company, LLC P.O. Box 480 Vice President - Licensing and Regulatory Middletown, PA 17057 Affairs AmerGen Energy Company, LLC Regulatory Assurance Manager -

4300 Winfield Road Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Warrenville, IL 60555 Unit 1 AmerGen Energy Company, LLC Regional Administrator P.O. Box 480 Region I Middletown, PA 17057 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road Ronald Bellamy, Region I King of Prussia, PA 19406 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road Chairman King of Prussia, PA 19406 Board of County Commissioners of Dauphin County Ronnie Gardner, PMP Dauphin County Courthouse Manager, Site Operations and Corporate Harrisburg, PA 17120 Regulatory Affairs AREVA NP Inc.

Chairman 3315 Old Forest Road OF-16 Board of Supervisors Lynchburg, VA 24501 of Londonderry Township R.D. #1, Geyers Church Road Dr. Judith Johnsrud Middletown, PA 17057 National Energy Committee Sierra Club Senior Resident Inspector (TMI-1) 433 Orlando Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission State College, PA 16803 P.O. Box 219 Middletown, PA 17057 Eric Epstein TMI Alert Director - Licensing and Regulatory Affairs 4100 Hillsdale Road AmerGen Energy Company, LLC Harrisburg, PA 17112 Correspondence Control P.O. Box 160 Kennett Square, PA 19348

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 cc:

Correspondence Control Desk Albert A. Fulvio, Senior Project Manager AmerGen Energy Company, LLC License Renewal 200 Exelon Way, KSA 1-N-1 Exelon Nuclear Kennett Square, PA 19348 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348 Manager Licensing - Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Rich Janati, Chief Exelon Generation Company, LLC Division of Nuclear Safety Correspondence Control Bureau of Radiation Protection P.O. Box 160 Pennsylvania Department of Kennett Square, PA 19348 Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building Christopher M. Crane P.O. Box 8469 President and Chief Executive Officer Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 AmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Michael Murphy Warrenville, IL 60555 Bureau of Radiation Protection Pennsylvania Department of Mr. Charles G. Pardee Environmental Protection Chief Nuclear Officer Rachel Carson State Office Building AmerGen Energy Company, LLC P.O. Box 8469 200 Exelon Way Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 Kennett Square, PA 19348 Michael G. Brownell, Chief Associate General Counsel Water Resources Management AmerGen Energy Company, LLC Susquehanna River Basin Commission 4300 Winfield Road 1721 N. Front Street Warrenville, IL 60555 Harrisburg, PA 17102 Chief Operating Officer (COO) Rachel Diamond, Regional Director AmerGen Energy Company, LLC Southcentral Regional Office 4300 Winfield Road Pennsylvania Department of Warrenville, IL 60555 Environmental Protection 909 Elmerton Avenue Senior Vice President - Operations Support Harrisburg, PA 17110 AmerGen Energy Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Nancy Ranek Warrenville, IL 60555 Environmental Lead, License Renewal Exelon Nuclear 200 Exelon Way, KSA/2-E Kennett Square, PA 19348

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 cc:

Frederick W. Polaski Manager License Renewal Exelon Nuclear 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348 Christopher Wilson KSQ License Renewal Exelon Nuclear 200 Exelon Way, KSA/2-E Kennett Square, PA 19348 Mr. Michael P. Gallagher Vice President License Renewal Projects AmerGen Energy Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SECTIONS 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, & 2.5 THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT - 1 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LRA Section: 2.2, Plant Level Scoping Results Table 2.2-1, Page 2.2-6 RAI#: 2.2-1 Table 2.2-1, Plant Level Scoping Results, lists the Chemical Cleaning Building as NOT being within the scope of license renewal. However, the TMI UFSAR, Section 5.1.1.1.a, lists the Chem Cleaning Building Basin as a Class I structure. If it is not included as an oversight, please provide a description of the scoping and aging management review. If it is covered somewhere else in the LRA, please indicate the location, or provide the basis for its exclusion from the scope of license renewal.

LRA Section: 2.3, Scoping and Screening Results: Mechanical 2.3.3, Auxiliary Systems 2.3.3.10, Fire Protection System The staff reviewed the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station (TMI), Unit 1, license renewal application (LRA); updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR), Section 9.9, Plant Fire Protection Program; NRC-approved fire protection program; fire hazard analysis Volumes 1 and 2; point-by-point comparison with Appendix A to Branch Technical Position (BTP) Auxiliary and Power Conversion Systems Branch (APCSB) 9.5-1, Guidelines for Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants May 1, 1976, documented in the TMI-1 UFSAR, Section 9.9; and fire protection current licensing basis documents listed in the TMI Unit 1 Operating License Condition 2.c.4.

RAI#: 2.3.3.10-1 LRA Tables 2.3.3-10 and 3.3.2-10 exclude several types of fire protection components that are discussed in the Safety Evaluation Reports (SERs) and/or UFSAR. These components are listed below:

  • hose connections
  • hose racks
  • yard hose houses
  • interior fire hose stations
  • pipe supports
  • buried piping
  • filter housing
  • flexible hose ENCLOSURE
  • dikes for oil spill confinement
  • fire water main loop valves
  • post indicator valves
  • lubricating oil cooler
  • auxiliary lubricating oil makeup tank
  • floor drains and curbs for fire-fighting water
  • backflow prevention devices
  • flame retardant coating for cables
  • fire retardant coating for structural steel supporting walls and ceilings
  • thermal insulation on valves
  • engine intake and exhaust silencers/muffler (diesel driven fire pump)
  • heat exchangers (shell)
  • heat exchangers (tube)

For each, determine whether the component should be included in Tables 2.3.3.10 and 3.3.2-10, and, if not, justify the exclusion.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures RAI#: 2.4.0-1 To clarify the component identified as Steel Components: All Structural Steel in various LRA Tables 2.4-XX, please confirm that the connection components (e.g. gusset plates, welds, etc.)

are in-scope for license renewal and subject to an AMR.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures 2.4.2, Auxiliary Building RAI#: 2.4.2-1 Section 2.6.5.d.4 of the TMI UFSAR states, Flood Gate (TMI-FG-B1) at 306 foot floor elevation between Aux Building and Turbine Building areas.

Table 2.4-2 for the Auxiliary Building Components Subject to Aging Management Review does not list Flood Gate specifically in any row. If it is not included as an oversight, please provide a description of the scoping and aging management review. If it is covered somewhere else in the LRA, please indicate the location. If it is excluded from the scope of license renewal, please provide the basis for the exclusion.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures 2.4.4, Control Building

RAI#: 2.4.4-1 Section 2.6.5.c of the TMI UFSAR states, Flood Gate (TMI-FG-B2) at 306 foot floor elevation between Turbine Building and Control Building areas.

Table 2.4-4 for the Control Building Components Subject to Aging Management Review does not list Flood Gate specifically in any row. If it is not included as an oversight, please provide a description of the scoping and aging management review. If it is covered somewhere else in the LRA, please indicate the location. If it is excluded from the scope of license renewal, please provide the basis for the exclusion.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures 2.4.5, Diesel Generator Building RAI#: 2.4.5-1 Section 2.6.5.f.1 of the TMI UFSAR states,

1. Flood Gates (TMI-FG-D1/D2A/D2B/D3) at 305 foot floor elevation.

Table 2.4-5 for the Diesel Generator Building Components Subject to Aging Management Review does not list Flood Gates specifically in any row. Please clarify if the Flood Gates fall into the Metal components: All structural members category. If they are not included as an oversight, please provide a description of the scoping and aging management review. If they are covered somewhere else in the LRA, please indicate the location. If they are excluded from the scope of license renewal, please provide the basis for the exclusion.

RAI#: 2.4.5-2 Section 2.4.5 of the LRA, regarding the Diesel Generator Building, states, Steel panels are installed in the equipment access openings on the west side of the building for protection from flood and tornado loads including tornado missiles.

Table 2.4-5 for the Diesel Generator Building Components Subject to Aging Management Review does not list Missile Protection as an intended function for any components other than Concrete. Please address the absence of the Missile Protection function of the aforementioned steel panels from Table 2.4-5.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures 2.4.6, Dike/Flood Control System RAI#: 2.4.6-1 Section 2.4.6 of the LRA, regarding the Dike/Flood Control System, states,

This structure also contains a sluice gate and associated operator supported by a structural steel platform on the inboard side of the dikeThe sluice gate and associated operator on the inboard side of the dike are active components and, therefore, are not subject to aging management review.

The aforementioned structural steel platform is not listed in Table 2.4-6, Components Subject to Aging Management Review, nor is it explicitly excluded from the scope by the Section 2.4.6 evaluation. If it is not included as an oversight, please provide a description of the scoping and aging management review. If it is covered somewhere else in the LRA, please indicate the location. If it is excluded from the scope of license renewal, please provide the basis for the exclusion.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures 2.4.10, Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower Structures RAI#: 2.4.10-1 Section 2.4.10 of the LRA, Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower (MDCT) Structures, states that the intended function of the MDCT basin is to provide structural support and a flow path for the inlet and outlet river discharge piping. Within the current licensing basis, please justify the LRA statement that the failure of the building, adjoining TMI-2 structure, and sodium bisulfate tank foundation and dike does not affect the intended functions of the MDCT basin.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures 2.4.12, Natural Draft Cooling Towers RAI#: 2.4.12-1 Section 2.4.12 of the LRA, Natural Draft Cooling Towers, states that the intended function of the reinforced concrete basin is to provide structural support and a flow path for the Circulating Water Pump House. Within the current licensing basis, please justify the LRA statement that the failure of the reinforced concrete hyperbolic towers, the wooden fill structure, and the canopy at the base of the towers does not affect the intended functions of the basin.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures 2.4.14, Reactor Building RAI#: 2.4.14-1 Section 2.4.14, Reactor Building, of the LRA states, The foundation matis a nominal 9 feet thick with a 2 foot thick concrete slab above the bottom 1/4 -inch liner plate.

Please confirm that the inaccessible floor liner plate of the base mat including the leak chase system and the concrete fill slab above this liner are included in the components listed in Table 2.4-14.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures 2.4.16, Service Building RAI#: 2.4.16-1 Section 2.4.16, Service Building, of the LRA states, The evaluation boundary for the Service Building includes the Service Building and Machine Shop, which are classified as Class III structures and designed to withstand the effects of normal operating loads.

The purpose of the Service Building is to provide structural support, shelter, and protection for safety-related mechanical components required for safe operation of the plant, including safe shutdown of the reactor.

Per UFSAR Section 5.1.1.3, Class III structures, systems, and components (SSC) are those SSC which are not related to reactor operation. As such, the staff finds the above statements within the LRA contradictory and in need of clarification.

RAI#: 2.4.16-2 Section 2.4.16, Service Building, of the LRA states, Some of the interior reinforced concrete piers and a portion of the exterior reinforced concrete grade beam are supported on the reinforced concrete circulating water pipe tunnel which passes under the Service Building concrete floor slab at elevation 305-0.

Table 2.4-16 does not explicitly refer to the reinforced concrete circulating water pipe tunnel, nor does Section 2.4.11, Miscellaneous Yard Structures. Please confirm that the reinforced concrete circulating water pipe tunnel which provides support for the Service Building is included in the scope of license renewal. If it is not included as an oversight, please provide a description of the scoping and aging management review. If it is covered somewhere else in the LRA, please indicate the location. If it is excluded from the scope of license renewal, please provide the basis for the exclusion.

LRA Section: 2.4, Scoping and Screening Results: Structures 2.4.19, Turbine Building RAI#: 2.4.19-1 Section 2.4.19, Turbine Building, of the LRA states, The purpose of the buildings is to provide structural support, shelter and protection for mechanical and electrical equipment required for safe operation of the plant, including safe shutdown of the reactor.

Section 5.4.3.2.5 of the TMI UFSAR states, There is no equipment located in the Turbine Building that is required for safe shutdown of the plant.

The staff finds these statements contradictory and in need of clarification.

LRA Section: 2.5, Scoping and Screening Results: Electrical Systems/Commodity Groups RAI #: 2.5-1 Operating experience has shown that cable tie-wraps can fail as a result of age-related brittleness of the plastic material. These cable tie-wraps would be considered long-lived passive components depending on whether they have a credited design function. Some possible intended design functions include:

maintaining spacing for power cable ampacity; maintaining stiffness in unsupported lengths of wire bundles to ensure minimum bending radius; and maintaining cables within vertical raceways, among others. Most recently, at Point Beach, the regional inspectors identified an unresolved item (Inspection Report 05000266/2006006; 05000301/2006006) after noticing that the current configuration of the plant may not be consistent with plant design documents due to the age-related breakage of a large number of plastic tie-wraps used to fasten wires and cables. At Point Beach, cable tie-wraps are used to maintain cable ampacity or are used to seismically qualify the cable tray system. Explain how Three Mile Island manages the aging of cable tie-wraps if they are credited in the plant design basis. In addition, justify the exclusion of cable tie-wraps from the scope of license renewal (see 10 CFR 54.4).