|
---|
Category:License-Operator
MONTHYEARIR 05000397/20253012024-02-14014 February 2024 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000397/2025301 ML23115A3552023-03-0909 March 2023 10-CGS-2023-02 Post Exam Comments ML23115A3562023-03-0909 March 2023 11-CGS-2023-02 Public Forms IR 05000397/20213012021-04-21021 April 2021 NRC Exam Report 05000397/2021301 ML21113A0062021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-FINAL Outlines ML21098A1702021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-FINAL Written Examination ML21113A0002021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Op Test Comments ML21113A0012021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Op Test ML21113A0022021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Outline Comments ML21098A1692021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-FINAL Operating Test ML21098A1712021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-Post Exam Submittal ML21113A0072021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-Public Forms, Exam Assignment Tickler ML21113A0052021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Written Exam ML21113A0042021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Written Exam Comments ML21113A0032021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-Draft Outlines ML20108F0522020-04-16016 April 2020 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000397/2021301 ML19011A3712019-01-10010 January 2019 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2019 ML18145A2312018-05-29029 May 2018 Errata for Columbia Generating Station - Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000397/2019301 ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML17081A5402017-03-0909 March 2017 4-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Draft Written Exam Comments ML17081A5352017-03-0909 March 2017 10-Columbia-2017-02 Post-Exam Comments ML17081A5422017-03-0909 March 2017 6-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Draft Operating Test Comments ML17081A5372017-03-0909 March 2017 1-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Draft Outlines ML17081A5332017-03-0909 March 2017 8-Columbia-2017-02 Final Written Exam ML17081A5342017-03-0909 March 2017 9-Columbia-2017-02 Final Operating Test ML17081A5392017-03-0909 March 2017 3-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Draft Written Exam ML17081A5412017-03-0909 March 2017 5-Columbia-2017-02 Draft Operating Test ML17100A3992017-03-0909 March 2017 11-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Public Forms ML17081A5432017-03-0909 March 2017 7-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Final Outlines ML17081A5382017-03-0909 March 2017 2-Columbia-2017-02 Draft Outline Comments ML17048A3562017-02-17017 February 2017 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results ML17094A5682017-02-16016 February 2017 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000397/2017301 ML17013A5482017-01-13013 January 2017 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2017 GO2-16-106, Voluntary Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-092016-07-13013 July 2016 Voluntary Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-09 ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML15273A3322015-09-30030 September 2015 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results Sept 2015 ML15167A1332015-05-13013 May 2015 2015-04 Post Exam Comments Analysis ML15167A1402015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Op Test ML15183A0512015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Public Forms ML15167A1502015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Final Outlines ML15167A1492015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Op Test Comments ML15167A1472015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Written Exam Comments ML15167A1452015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 - Draft Outline Comments ML15167A1442015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Outlines ML15167A1382015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Written Exams ML15167A1282015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 As-given Op Test Files ML15167A1272015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Final Op Test ML15167A1232015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Final Written Exams ML15111A0662015-04-21021 April 2015 Examination Approval 05000397/2015301 ML14345A3302014-12-11011 December 2014 Announcement of the Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examinations for 2015 2024-02-14
[Table view] Category:Part 55 Examination Related Material
MONTHYEARIR 05000397/20253012024-02-14014 February 2024 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000397/2025301 ML23115A3552023-03-0909 March 2023 10-CGS-2023-02 Post Exam Comments ML23115A3562023-03-0909 March 2023 11-CGS-2023-02 Public Forms IR 05000397/20213012021-04-21021 April 2021 NRC Exam Report 05000397/2021301 ML21113A0062021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-FINAL Outlines ML21098A1692021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-FINAL Operating Test ML21098A1702021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-FINAL Written Examination ML21098A1712021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-Post Exam Submittal ML21113A0072021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-Public Forms, Exam Assignment Tickler ML21113A0032021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-Draft Outlines ML21113A0042021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Written Exam Comments ML21113A0052021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Written Exam ML21113A0002021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Op Test Comments ML21113A0012021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Op Test ML21113A0022021-03-0404 March 2021 CG-2021-02-DRAFT Outline Comments ML20108F0522020-04-16016 April 2020 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000397/2021301 ML18145A2312018-05-29029 May 2018 Errata for Columbia Generating Station - Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000397/2019301 ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML17081A5342017-03-0909 March 2017 9-Columbia-2017-02 Final Operating Test ML17100A3992017-03-0909 March 2017 11-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Public Forms ML17081A5352017-03-0909 March 2017 10-Columbia-2017-02 Post-Exam Comments ML17081A5422017-03-0909 March 2017 6-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Draft Operating Test Comments ML17081A5372017-03-0909 March 2017 1-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Draft Outlines ML17081A5402017-03-0909 March 2017 4-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Draft Written Exam Comments ML17081A5412017-03-0909 March 2017 5-Columbia-2017-02 Draft Operating Test ML17081A5432017-03-0909 March 2017 7-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Final Outlines ML17081A5332017-03-0909 March 2017 8-Columbia-2017-02 Final Written Exam ML17081A5392017-03-0909 March 2017 3-COLUMBIA-2017-02 Draft Written Exam ML17081A5382017-03-0909 March 2017 2-Columbia-2017-02 Draft Outline Comments ML17048A3562017-02-17017 February 2017 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results GO2-16-106, Voluntary Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-092016-07-13013 July 2016 Voluntary Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-09 ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML15273A3322015-09-30030 September 2015 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results Sept 2015 ML15167A1332015-05-13013 May 2015 2015-04 Post Exam Comments Analysis ML15183A0512015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Public Forms ML15167A1502015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Final Outlines ML15167A1492015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Op Test Comments ML15167A1472015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Written Exam Comments ML15167A1452015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 - Draft Outline Comments ML15167A1442015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Outlines ML15167A1402015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Op Test ML15167A1232015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Final Written Exams ML15167A1272015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Final Op Test ML15167A1282015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 As-given Op Test Files ML15167A1382015-05-0505 May 2015 2015-04 Draft Written Exams ML15111A0662015-04-21021 April 2015 Examination Approval 05000397/2015301 ML14345A3302014-12-11011 December 2014 Announcement of the Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examinations for 2015 ML14163A4792014-05-29029 May 2014 Voluntary Response to Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2014-05, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML13056A5202013-02-12012 February 2013 2013-02- Exam Performance Analysis ML13084A1092013-02-0808 February 2013 Generation Station-2013-02-Draft Operating Test Comments 2024-02-14
[Table view] |
Text
CG - 2009 - 10 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS ADMIN JPMS
- 4. Job Content
- 1. 2. 3. Attributes 6.
Errors 5.
JPM# Dyn LOD Explanation U/E/S (D/S) (1-5) IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia (See below for instructions)
Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link RO (A1) S RO (A2) S RO (A3) S RO (A4) S SRO (A5) S SRO (A6) S SRO (A7) S SRO (A8) S SRO (A9) S Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconfiguration or realignment.
- 2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.
- 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:
- The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.
- The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).
- All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.
- Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
- Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.
- 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:
- Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).
- Task is trivial and without safety significance.
- 5. Based on the reviewer=s judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 6. Provide a brief description of any U or E rating in the explanation column.
- 7. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form. 0 Page 1 of 3 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
SITE - YEAR - MONTH DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS CONTROL ROOM/IN-PLANT SYSTEMS JPMS
- 4. Job Content
- 1. 2. 3. Attributes 6.
Errors 5.
JPM# Dyn LOD Explanation U/E/S (D/S) (1-5) IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia (See below for instructions)
Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link S1 S S2 S S3 S S4 S S5 S S6 S S7 S S8 S P1 S P2 S P3 S Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconfiguration or realignment.
- 2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.
- 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:
$ The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.
$ The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).
$ All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.
$ Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
$ Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.
- 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:
- Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).
- Task is trivial and without safety significance.
- 5. Based on the reviewer=s judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 6. Provide a brief description of any U or E rating in the explanation column.
- 7. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form. 0 Page 2 of 3 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process
SITE - YEAR - MONTH DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS SCENARIOS Scenario 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
- 10. Explanation (See below for instructions)
Set ES TS Crit IC Pred TL L/C Eff U/E/S 1 S 2 S 3 S Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating test scenario sets. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. ES: ES-301 checklists 4, 5, & 6 satisfied.
- 2. TS: Set includes SRO TS actions for each SRO, with required actions explicitly detailed.
- 3. Crit: Each manipulation or evolution has explicit success criteria documented in Form ES-D-2.
- 4. IC: Out of service equipment and other initial conditions reasonably consistent between scenarios and not predictive of scenario events and actions.
- 5. Pred: Scenario sequence and other factors avoid predictability issues.
- 6. TL: Time line constructed, including event and process triggered conditions, such that scenario can run without routine examiner cuing.
- 7. L/C: Length and complexity for each scenario in the set is reasonable for the crew mix being examined, such that all applicants have reasonably similar exposure and events are needed for evaluation purposes.
- 8. Eff: Sequence of events is reasonably efficient for examination purposes, especially with respect to long delays or interactions.
- 9. Based on the reviewer=s judgment, rate the scenario set as (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory.
- 10. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column.
- 11. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form. 0 Page 3 of 3 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process