ML23115A356
ML23115A356 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Columbia |
Issue date: | 03/09/2023 |
From: | Heather Gepford NRC/RGN-IV/DORS/OB |
To: | Energy Northwest |
References | |
05000397/2023301 | |
Download: ML23115A356 (1) | |
Text
EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief: Kirkland Facility: CGS Date of Written Exam: 3/9/2023 U/I: Start of Op Test: 2/20/2023 End of Op Test: 2/24/2023 Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility Due Date Description Date Complete Initials Notes For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for 6/20/2022 Examination administration date confirmed 4/20/2022 the facility to submit reference materials 7/25/2022 NRC examiners and facility contact assigned 4/20/2022 7/25/2022 Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements 4/20/2022 9/19/2022 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams n/a n/a ES-2.1.F 7/25/2022 Corporate Notification Letter sent 5/3/2022 Letter 2.1-1 produced by CE 8/8/2022 NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact 4/20/2022 Forms 4.1-BWR/PWR and COMMON 9/19/2022 Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due 9/19/2022 NH Forms 1.3-1, 2.3-1, 3.2-1, 3.2-2, 3.4-1, 3.3-1 Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided 10/3/2022 to facility licensee 10/3/2022 NH Form 2.3-1 signed by CE & BC NRC-prepared examinations approved by the NRC supervisor and 11/14/2022 forwarded for facility licensee review n/a n/a Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and 12/5/2022 reference materials due.
12/7/2022 NH Dec 9th due to licensee manpower 12/19/2022 Peer review of written exam complete 12/15/2022 NH Form 2.3-5 1/2/2023 Written exam and operating test reviews completed 1/6/2023 NH Document review on Forms 2.3-3 and 2.3-5 1/16/2023 Feedback approved by Branch Chief 1/13/2023 NH Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility 1/16/2023 licensee 1/18/2023 NH Provided 1/13/23. Meeting 1/18/2023 1/23/2023 On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications 1/23/2023 NH 1/23/2023 Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due 1/17/2023 NH NRC Forms 398/396 1/30/2023 Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed 1/19/2023 NH 2/6/2023 Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due 2/2/2023 NH Form 2.2-1 2/13/2023 Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief 2/13/2023 NH Facility licensee management feedback on the examination 2/13/2023 requested by the NRC supervisor 2/13/2023 NH Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and 2/13/2023 waiver/excusal letters sent 2/14/2023 NH BC signs Exam Approval Letter (Form 2.3-1)
Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with 2/13/2023 facility licensee 1/23/2023 NH 2/13/2023 Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners 2/14/2023 NH 2/20/2023 Administer Operating Test 2/20/2023 NH 3/10/2023 Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's 3/17/2023 NH 3/29/2023 Post exam comments and graded exams received 3/21/2023 NH Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC 4/6/2023 grading completed 4/10/2023 NH Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 4/6/2023 updated 3/22/2023 NH Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam 4/13/2023 grading completed 4/12/2023 NH Signed ES 303's to BC 4/20/2023 Branch Chief review of exam results completed 4/19/2023 NH 4/27/2023 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision n/a 4/27/2023 License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results 4/19/2023 NH 4/27/2023 RPS/IP number of examinees updated 4/14/2023 NH print Report-21 5/18/2023 Final Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review) TBD 21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.
5/25/2023 Examination Report Issued TBD produced by CE 6/1/2023 Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals TBD Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 12, Forms 2.1-1 and 5.1-1 Rev. 12
Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Examination:
(Y)es / (N)o Item Task Description a b* c#
- a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the z
w I-I-
instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (KIA) categories are appropriately sampled. y Y s: b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. IV V Y
- c. Justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are acceptable. IV y Y
- a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario Y
y y set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutions, instrument and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major transients.
0:::
- b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of y
y I- applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on Y subsequent days.
C. Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s). y y Y y y
- d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.
Y
- a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s). y y Y
- b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in en the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).
y y Y y y Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is Y
C.
sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights). y V Y
...J
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 10 CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is appropriate y Y
w z
- c. Check whether KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater than or equal to 2.5. y '-( (
Y w
Cl d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams. 'l \ Y
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. y V Y
- f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior reactor operator). '< 'I Y l
==;vt P,i,ledNam Date
- a. Author fTIZll '( b * $1 1.."2..
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) l', .J r _,. (" 1/ i r l-7--z_
C. NRC Reviewer (#) Nicholas Hernandez 10/3/2022 NRC Chief Examiner Nicholas Hernandez 10/3/2022 NRC Supervisor Heather Gepford 10/3/2022
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- An independent NRG reviewer performs the steps in column "c." This may be the NRG Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.
ES-2.3, Page 9 of 19
Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: Columbia Date of Exam: 2/20/2023 Exam Level: RO IX] SRO IX]
(Y)es /(N)o Item Description a b* c#
- 1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. Each question includes a technical reference.
y y Y l2. a. All questions reference NRC knowledge and abilities(KIAs) requirements.
- b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. y Y
- c. All questions include an explanation of the correct answer explanation and a distractor analysis.
')
- 14. The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four reactor operator(RO) or two y
SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, including full(100-question) Y y
retake examinations, consult the NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation operator licensing prooram office.)
- 5. Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
_.lL The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed.
_ The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started.
_ The examinations were developed independently.
y y Y
_ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication.
Other (explain):
- 6. Bank use meets limits(no more than 75% from the bank, at least 10% Bank Modified New new(at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution> 22 /4 3/1 50 / 20 y y Y
- 7. Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO exam and at Memory C/A least 13 of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution> 31/ 8 44/ 17 y '7 Y
- 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors. y y Y
- 9. Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the KIA statements' assigned tier; deviations are justified.
y y Y
- 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2. y
'I Y
- 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
y y Y Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Author 12.[of3/
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) ,/J..J...
C. NRC Reviewer (#)
Nicholas Hernandez 2/9/2023 NRC Chief Examiner Nicholas Hernandez 2/9/2023 NRC Regional Supervisor Heather Gepford 2/9/23
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer performs steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the written examination under review.
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Nicholas Hernandez 2/9/2023 Nicholas Hernandez 2/9/2023 Heather Gepford 2/13/23
ILC 25 Rev 12 Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Rev 11/19/22 Crew #1 SROU-1: RO-1: RO-2:
Facility: Columbia Generating Station Date of Exam: 02/20/23 Operating Test No.:1 A E Scenarios P V T M P E 4- I L N 1 2 3 O I T Spare T N I
C A POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITIO M A T L N U N Y M(*)
T P S A B S A B S A B S A B E R T O R T O R T O R T O R I U O C P O C P O C P O C P RO RX 5 1 2 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 - 1 1 1 1 U1 I/C 4,8,9 2,3,7 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 4,6 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr - - 0 1 1 0 TS 2,3 1,2 4 0 2 2 RO RX 5 - 1 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 - 1 1 1 1 R1 I/C 7,8 1,3,5,7 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 4,6 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr - 5 1 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RO RX - 1 1 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 - 1 1 1 1 R2 I/C 3,4 2,3,8 7 4 4 2 SRO-U 8,9 MAJ 4,6 4,6 4 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 9 8 2 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2
ILC 25 Rev 12 Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Rev 11/19/22 Crew #2 SROU-2: RO-3: RO-4:
Facility: Columbia Generating Station Date of Exam: 02/20/23 Operating Test No.:1 A E Scenarios P V T M P E 4- I L N 1 2 3 O I T Spare T N I
C A POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITIO M A T L N U N Y M(*)
T P S A B S A B S A B S A B E R T O R T O R T O R T O R I U O C P O C P O C P O C P RO RX 1 - 1 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR - - ** 1 1 1 U2 I/C 2,3,7 1,4,7 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 4,6 5 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr - - 0 1 1 0 TS 1,2 1,2 4 0 2 2 RO RX 1 - 1 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR - - ** 1 1 1 R3 I/C 2,3,8 1,6,7 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 4,6 5 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 8 6 2 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RO RX - - ** 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR - - ** 1 1 1 R4 I/C 1,3,5,7 3,4,7 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 4,6 5 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 5 3 2 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2
(**) I/C malfunction substituted for normal evolution and/or Reactivity manipulation on a one-for-one basis per NUREG 1021 Rev12
ILC 25 Rev 12 Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Rev 11/19/22 Crew #3 SROI-1: SROI-2: RO-5:
Facility: Columbia Generating Station Date of Exam: 02/20/23 Operating Test No.:1 A E Scenarios P V T M P E 4- I L N 1 2 3 (With Crew 5) O I T Spare T N I
C A POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITIO M A T L N U N Y M(*)
T P S A B S A B S A B S A B E R T O R T O R T O R T O R I U O C P O C P O C P O C P RO RX 5 1 - 2 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 - - 1 1 1 1 I1 I/C 4,8,9 2,3,8 1,4,7 9 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 4,6 5 4 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr - 8 - 1 1 1 0 TS 2,3 1,2 4 0 2 2 RO RX - 1 1 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 - 1 1 1 1 I2 I/C 3,4 2,3,7 7 4 4 2 SRO-U 8,9 MAJ 4,6 4,6 4 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 9 - 1 1 1 0 TS 1,2 2 0 2 2 RO RX 5 - 1 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 - 1 1 1 1 R5 I/C 7,8 1,3,5,7 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 4,6 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr - 5 1 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2
ILC 25 Rev 12 Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Rev 11/19/22 Crew #4 SROI-3: SROI-4: RO-6:
Facility: Columbia Generating Station Date of Exam: 02/20/23 Operating Test No.:1 A E Scenarios P V T M P E I
L N 1 2 3 4-Spare O N
I T T I
C A POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION M A T L U N Y S A B S A B S A B S A B M(*)
T P R T O R T O R T O R T O E O C P O C P O C P O C P R I U RO RX 5 - 1 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 - 1 1 1 1 I3 I/C 4,8,9 3,4,7 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr - 3 1 1 1 0 TS 2,3 2 0 2 2 RO RX - - ** 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR 1 - 1 1 1 1 I4 I/C 3,4 1,4,7 7 4 4 2 SRO-U 8,9 MAJ 4,6 5 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 9 - 1 1 1 0 TS 1,2 2 0 2 2 RO RX 5 - 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 - 1 1 1 1 R6 SRO-I I/C 7,8 1,6,7 5 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 6 5 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr - 6 1 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2
(**) I/C malfunction substituted for Reactivity manipulation on a one-for-one basis per NUREG 1021 Rev12
ILC 25 Rev 12 Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Rev 11/19/22 Crew #5 Surrogate CRS RO-7: RO-8:
Facility: Columbia Generating Station Date of Exam: 02//23 Operating Test No.:1 A E Scenarios P V T M P E I
L N 1 2 3 4-Spare O N
I T T I
C A POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION M A T L U N Y S A B S A B S A B S A B M(*)
T P R T O R T O R T O R T O E O C P O C P O C P O C P R I U RX NOR Surrogate CRS I/C Surr MAJ Man. Ctlr TS RO RX 1 - 1 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR - - ** 1 1 1 R7 I/C 2,3,8 1,6,7 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 4,6 5 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 8 6 2 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2 RO RX - - ** 1 1 0 SRO-I NOR - - ** 1 1 1 R8 I/C 1,3,5,7 3,4,7 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 4,6 5 3 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 5 3 2 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2
(**) I/C malfunction substituted for normal evolution and/or Reactivity manipulation on a one-for-one basis per NUREG 1021 Rev12
ILC 25 Rev 12 Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Rev 11/19/22 Form 3.4-1 Instructions for the Events and Evolutions Checklist
- 1. Mark the applicant license level for each simulator operating test number.
- 2. For the set of scenario columns, fill in the associated event number from Form 3.3-1, Scenario Outline, to show the specific event types being used for the applicant while in the assigned crew position for that scenario.
- Minimums are subject to the instructions in Section C.2, License Level Criteria.
KEY: RX = Reactivity Manipulation; NOR = Normal Evolution; I/C = Instrument/Component Failure; MAJ = Major Transient; Man. Ctrl = Manual Control of Automatic Function; TS = Technical Specification Evaluation; RO = Reactor Operator; SRO-I or I = Instant Senior Reactor Operator; SRO-U or U = Upgrade Senior Reactor Operator; SRO = Senior Reactor Operator; ATC = At the Controls; and BOP = Balance of Plan
IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 10/01/2022 to 09/30/2023 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 By Date # Candidates Exam Staart Exam End Site Docket # Insp Rpt Cac # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Chief Examiner
- Author Examiner 1/22/2023 1/28/2023 Columbia 05000397, 2023301 000956 0 0 0 0 FB-OR-ONSITE Hernande Kirkland, John; Generating 05000460 VALIDATION z, Nick You, David; Station OF INITIAL Hernandez, LICENSE Nick; EXAMINATION Demarshall, (OV) Joseph; Murphy, Kevin 2/19/2023 2/25/2023 Columbia 05000397, 2023301 000500 7 0 4 2 FB-OR-INITIAL NFF Hernande Kirkland, John; Generating 05000460 LICENSE EXAM z, Nick You, David; Station ADMINISTRATI Hernandez, ON (EXAD) Nick; Demarshall, Joseph; Murphy, Kevin Sites: CGS Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV Prepared on 4/26/2023 11:32:30 AM
IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Region/Site Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 4 7 4 2 0 13 Exam Date/Site Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 2/19/2023 7 4 2 0 13 Region/Docket Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 4 7 4 2 0 13 Exam Date/Docket Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 2/19/2023 7 4 2 0 13 Sites: CGS Orgs: ALL Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV Prepared on 4/26/2023 11:32:30 AM