Text

Aam ROP-12 Slides
	ML12116A048
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	04/25/2012
From:	Hunegs G; NRC/RGN-I/DRP/PB6
To:	;
	HUNEGS, GK
Shared Package
ML12055A196	List: IR 05000289/2011001; ML12072A335; ML12116A048; ML12117A002;
References
	Download: ML12116A048 (23)
	v • d • e

Three Mile Island Annual Assessment p House Open 2011 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I

Presentation Introduction Reactor Oversight Process Industry Performance Three Mile Island Performance Results Web Information Contact Information

Purpose Open forum for public discussion regarding Exelons performance in 2011 NRC will answer questions related to performance issues identified during its annual assessment review of Three Mile Island performance

Region I Organization William Dean Regional Administrator David Lew Deputy Regional Administrator James Clifford Chris Miller Director, Division of Director, Division of Reactor Reactor Projects (Acting) Safety James Trapp Peter Wilson Deputy Director (Acting) Deputy Director Gordon Hunegs Branch Chief Regional Inspectors Various Project Engineers Three Mile Island Scott Barber Resident Inspectors Nathan Lafferty David Werkheiser Justin Heinly

What We Do Safety Security Environment

What We Regulate Reactors Materials Waste

What We Dont Regulate Military Radon X-Rays

Assurance of Plant Safety Continuous Long-Term Training Maintenance Regulation Compliance Defense In-Depth

How We Regulate Regulatory Framework NRCs Safety Mission Strategic Performance Areas Cornerstones Cross-Cutting Areas Human Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification & Resolution

Performance Indicators 17 Performance Indicators (PIs)

PIs for each cornerstone Licensee submits data to NRC quarterly Inspection program verifies accuracy Data available on NRC website

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green White Yellow Red Increasingg Safety y Significance g

Inspection Findings Green White Yellow Red Increasing Safety Significance

Action Matrix Columns Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response Degraded Performance Increasing

Safety Significance

Inspection

Management Involvement

Regulatory Action

Industry-Wide Performance 3 11 As of 12/31/2011 11 Licensee Response Regulatory Response Degraded g Cornerstone Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Unacceptable IMC 0350 Process 88

Industry-Wide Inspection Findings Finding data current as of 2/24/2012 and does not include security findings Calendar Year 2011 data Green 846 White 13 Yellow 2 Red 0

Industry-Wide Performance Indicators Calendar Year 2011 data Green 6585 White 9 Yellow 0 Red 0

NRC Annual Assessment Summary Three Mile Island Exelon operated the plant safely and in a manner that preserved public health and safety and protected the environment.

Three Mile Island was in the Licensee R

Response C Column l off NRCs NRC AAction ti Matrix M t i for f

the last quarter of 2011.

No substantive cross-cutting issues were identified The NRC plans to perform baseline inspections in 2012

NRC Inspection Activities Three Mile Island for 2011 5636 hours0.0652 days <br />1.566 hours <br />0.00932 weeks <br />0.00214 months <br /> of direct inspection Two resident inspectors on site Event response Inspect over 20 areas of plant performance

- Examples E l iinclude l d operator t performance, f risk i k management, equipment issues, and fire protection Nine regional inspections Three team inspections Triennial Fire Protection EP Exercise Evaluation Operator Licensing Examinations

Three Mile Island PIs and Findings January 1 through December 31, 2011 All Green Performance Indicators Five Green / Severity Level IV inspection findings

Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident