|
---|
Category:Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts
MONTHYEARML21053A4412021-02-23023 February 2021 NRC Staff Slides: Feb 23, 2021 Pre-submission Meeting for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) ML21042A0772021-02-11011 February 2021 Public-Watchdogs-Langley-Final-02-11-2021 ML20149K4992020-07-0101 July 2020 California Coastal Commission July 2020 Meeting on San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Inspection and Maintenance Program ML20178A2482020-06-24024 June 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail from Public Watchdogs with Presentations for June 24th Public Meeting with the NRC ML20178A2492020-06-24024 June 2020 Public Watchdogs - 10 CFR 2.206 Meeting with NRC - Petition Review Board, June 23, 2020 ML19234A0082019-08-20020 August 2019 Southern California Edison Company, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, August 20 2019 NRC Town Hall Meeting Sjc ML19154A1372019-06-0303 June 2019 June 3, 2019, Webinar Slides ML19084A1342019-03-25025 March 2019 NRC Slides for March 25 2019 Public Webinar ML19029B5092019-01-24024 January 2019 Final NRC Presentation for SCE Enforcement Conference ML18353A7492018-12-12012 December 2018 Presentation Slides: NRC SONGS Presentation December 2018, Victor ML18340A1762018-11-29029 November 2018 Southern California Edison Company; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station; SONGS Community Engagement Panel, November 29, 2018 ML18318A0642018-11-0808 November 2018 Public Meeting Slides with Extra Content ML18312A1182018-11-0808 November 2018 Presentation for San Onofre Special Inspection Webinar November 8, 2018 ML17088A6572017-03-28028 March 2017 2017 RIC Presentation from Yamir Diaz-Castillo Entitled, Current NRC Vendor Findings and the Results from the 1st SONGS Lessons Learned Inspection. ML14216A4512015-02-0909 February 2015 7/31/14 Summary of Closed Meeting with Southern California Edison to Discuss Scope and Schedule Related to Cyber Security License Amendment Request for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML14303A6392014-10-27027 October 2014 NRC Slides - SONGS PSDAR Public Meeting October 27, 2014 ML14303A6242014-10-27027 October 2014 Licensee'S Slides - SONGS PSDAR Public Meeting October 27, 2014 ML14272A4152014-09-25025 September 2014 SONGS EP RAI Response Review Slides - Public Meeting September 25, 2014 ML14272A4652014-09-24024 September 2014 SONGS Public Meeting Slides (Non-Public Portion) - Public Meeting September 24, 2014 ML14239A4642014-08-28028 August 2014 August 28, 2014, Public Meeting Slides Concerning San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Decommisioning Quality Assurance Program ML14199A0982014-07-17017 July 2014 SONGS Cep Meeting Slides- Reactor Decommissioning Process ML13268A0032013-09-25025 September 2013 Reactor Decommissioning Process- Presentation for San Onofre 2&3 PSDAR Public Meeting ML13092A2882013-04-0202 April 2013 Licensee Slides for 4/3/13 Pre-Submittal Meeting to Discuss License Amendment Request ML13059A1572013-02-27027 February 2013 Licensee Slides from 2/27/13 Meeting Regarding a Request for Additional Information ML13059A1522013-02-27027 February 2013 NRC Meeting Slides from 2/27/13 Public RAI Meeting ML13016A0922013-01-16016 January 2013 G20120891, Friends of the Earth Presentation for 1/16/13 Meeting with to Provide an Opportunity to Address the NRC PRB, Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206. ML13016A0862013-01-16016 January 2013 Fairwinds Presentation for 1/16/13 Meeting with Friends of the Earth to Provide an Opportunity to Address the NRC PRB, Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 (TAC Nos. MF0060 & MF0060) ML12352A4112012-12-18018 December 2012 NRC Slides for 12/18/12 Meeting with Southern California Edison ML12352A3852012-12-18018 December 2012 Licensee Slides for 12/18/12 Public Meeting ML12346A1162012-12-10010 December 2012 Meeting Summary for November 30, 2012, Meeting with Southern California Edison Company ML12311A0492012-09-18018 September 2012 Part 26 Public Meeting NEI Presentation Slides ML12157A2722012-06-11011 June 2012 5/31/2012 Summary of Telephone Conference with Licensees Regarding Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Seismic Reevaluations - Diablo Canyon, 1 and 2, San Onofre, Units 2 and 3, Columbia Generating Station, and Palo Verde, Units 1, 2, a ML1115304302011-06-0101 June 2011 Meeting Summary for Public Meeting with Southern California Edison to Present & Discuss the Performance Results for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 & 3 for Period of January 1 Through December 31, 2010 ML1101206302011-01-12012 January 2011 License Amendment Request to Support Use of Areva Nuclear Fuel, Slides from 1/12/2011 Meeting ML1027304522010-09-30030 September 2010 Meeting Summary for 09/16/2010 Public Meeting with Southern California Edison ML0932402122009-11-20020 November 2009 Summary of Public Meeting with Southern California Edison Company on San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 2009 Performance ML0926502992009-09-22022 September 2009 Summary of Public Meeting with Southern California Edison Regarding Site Improvement Initiatives ML0914905092009-05-28028 May 2009 Summary of Meeting with Southern California Edison Company Several Initiatives That Were Being Implemented to Improve Licensed Operator Training at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ML0832408342008-10-30030 October 2008 Licensee Handout for 10-31-08 Call ML0819303742008-06-11011 June 2008 Attachment 2: Presentation Slides by James Shepherd, NRC from June 11, 2008 Public Meeting with SONGS ML0819305432008-06-11011 June 2008 Attachment 3: Presentation Slides, Emilio Garcia, NRC from June 11, 2008 Public Meeting with SONGS ML0819305802008-06-11011 June 2008 Attachment 4: Presentation Slides, James Reilly, SONGS from June 11, 2008 Public Meeting with SONGS ML0729806642007-10-24024 October 2007 Meeting Presentation on Update on Generic Safety Issue 191 Plant Audits ML0727500132007-09-25025 September 2007 9/25/2007 Licensee Handouts for Meeting Re San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3 - Reclassification of Control Rod Drive Mechanism 56 NDE (Non Destructive Examination) Indication ML0720703362007-07-20020 July 2007 Summary of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station End-Of-Cycle Public Meeting ML0634600722006-11-17017 November 2006 Licensee Information in Support of 11/17/2006 Discussions Steam Generator Tube Inspections - Refueling Outage 14 ML0613604892006-05-0303 May 2006 Meeting Slides, Southern California Edison for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (Enclosure 2) M060502, M060502-Briefing on Status of Emergency Planning Activities (Slides)2006-05-0202 May 2006 M060502-Briefing on Status of Emergency Planning Activities (Slides) ML0609601982006-01-23023 January 2006 SONGS 2, Handouts, Information Supplied by SCE in Support of Discussion ML0712401852005-12-31031 December 2005 Reactor Decommissioning Program Lessons-Learned 2021-02-23
[Table view] Category:Slides and Viewgraphs
MONTHYEARML21053A2382021-02-22022 February 2021 Southern California Edison Slides for Feb 23, 2021, Pre-submission Meeting for SONGS Proposed Exemption- 10 CFR 72.106b ML21042A0772021-02-11011 February 2021 Public-Watchdogs-Langley-Final-02-11-2021 ML20178A2482020-06-24024 June 2020 Public Watchdogs 10 CFR 2.206 Petition - E-mail from Public Watchdogs with Presentations for June 24th Public Meeting with the NRC ML20178A2492020-06-24024 June 2020 Public Watchdogs - 10 CFR 2.206 Meeting with NRC - Petition Review Board, June 23, 2020 ML19255F6182019-09-17017 September 2019 Presentation Slides: SONGS Recent Dry Storage Operating Experience ML19235A1892019-08-29029 August 2019 Final NEIMA Meeting Slides - SONGS Presentation ML19234A0082019-08-20020 August 2019 Southern California Edison Company, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, August 20 2019 NRC Town Hall Meeting Sjc ML19154A1372019-06-0303 June 2019 June 3, 2019, Webinar Slides ML19084A1342019-03-25025 March 2019 NRC Slides for March 25 2019 Public Webinar ML19029B5092019-01-24024 January 2019 Final NRC Presentation for SCE Enforcement Conference ML19023A0332019-01-24024 January 2019 Southern California Edison Company; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Pre-Decisional Enforcement Conference Slides ML19023A2492019-01-23023 January 2019 NRC Slides for Southern California Edison Conference January 24, 2019 ML18353A7492018-12-12012 December 2018 Presentation Slides: NRC SONGS Presentation December 2018, Victor ML18340A1762018-11-29029 November 2018 Southern California Edison Company; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station; SONGS Community Engagement Panel, November 29, 2018 ML18318A0642018-11-0808 November 2018 Public Meeting Slides with Extra Content ML18312A1182018-11-0808 November 2018 Presentation for San Onofre Special Inspection Webinar November 8, 2018 ML17088A6572017-03-28028 March 2017 2017 RIC Presentation from Yamir Diaz-Castillo Entitled, Current NRC Vendor Findings and the Results from the 1st SONGS Lessons Learned Inspection. ML14216A4512015-02-0909 February 2015 7/31/14 Summary of Closed Meeting with Southern California Edison to Discuss Scope and Schedule Related to Cyber Security License Amendment Request for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 ML14303A6392014-10-27027 October 2014 NRC Slides - SONGS PSDAR Public Meeting October 27, 2014 ML14303A6242014-10-27027 October 2014 Licensee'S Slides - SONGS PSDAR Public Meeting October 27, 2014 ML14272A4152014-09-25025 September 2014 SONGS EP RAI Response Review Slides - Public Meeting September 25, 2014 ML14272A4652014-09-24024 September 2014 SONGS Public Meeting Slides (Non-Public Portion) - Public Meeting September 24, 2014 ML14239A4642014-08-28028 August 2014 August 28, 2014, Public Meeting Slides Concerning San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Decommisioning Quality Assurance Program ML14199A0982014-07-17017 July 2014 SONGS Cep Meeting Slides- Reactor Decommissioning Process ML13268A0032013-09-25025 September 2013 Reactor Decommissioning Process- Presentation for San Onofre 2&3 PSDAR Public Meeting ML13227A1102013-08-13013 August 2013 8/13/13 Michael F. Weber, Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste, Research, State, Tribal, and Compliance Programs Testimony on: the U.S. Nrc'S Power Reactor Decommissioning Process ML13092A2882013-04-0202 April 2013 Licensee Slides for 4/3/13 Pre-Submittal Meeting to Discuss License Amendment Request ML13059A1522013-02-27027 February 2013 NRC Meeting Slides from 2/27/13 Public RAI Meeting ML13016A0922013-01-16016 January 2013 G20120891, Friends of the Earth Presentation for 1/16/13 Meeting with to Provide an Opportunity to Address the NRC PRB, Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206. ML13016A0862013-01-16016 January 2013 Fairwinds Presentation for 1/16/13 Meeting with Friends of the Earth to Provide an Opportunity to Address the NRC PRB, Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 (TAC Nos. MF0060 & MF0060) ML12352A4112012-12-18018 December 2012 NRC Slides for 12/18/12 Meeting with Southern California Edison ML12352A3852012-12-18018 December 2012 Licensee Slides for 12/18/12 Public Meeting ML12346A1162012-12-10010 December 2012 Meeting Summary for November 30, 2012, Meeting with Southern California Edison Company ML12311A0492012-09-18018 September 2012 Part 26 Public Meeting NEI Presentation Slides ML12179A4472012-06-26026 June 2012 6/18/2012 Meeting Summary for Augmented Inspection Team Exit Meeting with Southern California Edison Co ML12157A2722012-06-11011 June 2012 5/31/2012 Summary of Telephone Conference with Licensees Regarding Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 Seismic Reevaluations - Diablo Canyon, 1 and 2, San Onofre, Units 2 and 3, Columbia Generating Station, and Palo Verde, Units 1, 2, a ML1101206302011-01-12012 January 2011 License Amendment Request to Support Use of Areva Nuclear Fuel, Slides from 1/12/2011 Meeting ML0932402122009-11-20020 November 2009 Summary of Public Meeting with Southern California Edison Company on San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 2009 Performance ML0926502992009-09-22022 September 2009 Summary of Public Meeting with Southern California Edison Regarding Site Improvement Initiatives ML0914905092009-05-28028 May 2009 Summary of Meeting with Southern California Edison Company Several Initiatives That Were Being Implemented to Improve Licensed Operator Training at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ML11216A2442008-12-12012 December 2008 0523 - R504P - Westinghouse Advanced Technology - 07.3 - Water Hammer at San Onofre ML0832408342008-10-30030 October 2008 Licensee Handout for 10-31-08 Call ML0828804352008-10-14014 October 2008 Summary of Meeting with Southern California Edison to Discuss Performance at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ML0822602532008-08-12012 August 2008 Summary of Meeting on with Southern California Edison Co Regarding the End-of-Cycle Assessment of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ML0819303742008-06-11011 June 2008 Attachment 2: Presentation Slides by James Shepherd, NRC from June 11, 2008 Public Meeting with SONGS ML0819305802008-06-11011 June 2008 Attachment 4: Presentation Slides, James Reilly, SONGS from June 11, 2008 Public Meeting with SONGS ML0819305432008-06-11011 June 2008 Attachment 3: Presentation Slides, Emilio Garcia, NRC from June 11, 2008 Public Meeting with SONGS ML0729806642007-10-24024 October 2007 Meeting Presentation on Update on Generic Safety Issue 191 Plant Audits ML0727500132007-09-25025 September 2007 9/25/2007 Licensee Handouts for Meeting Re San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3 - Reclassification of Control Rod Drive Mechanism 56 NDE (Non Destructive Examination) Indication ML0720703362007-07-20020 July 2007 Summary of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station End-Of-Cycle Public Meeting 2021-02-22
[Table view] |
Text
1 September 25, 2007 Reclassification of Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CEDM) 56 NDE Indication Southern California Edison (SCE)San OnofreNuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Unit 3 2 Purpose*Based on all information available to date, SCE has reclassified the
indication in CEDM 56 as No Detectable Defect (NDD)-Discuss the technical basis for the reclassification-Discuss the licensing issues associated with the reclassification 3 Non Destructive Examination Results for San Onofre Unit-3 Control Element Drive Penetration 56 Southern California Edison 4 Key Points*Determination-The indication in CEDM 56 is not a defect -Code Relief for Flaw Evaluation is not required*Basis-Repair of CEDM 56 was based on refuted data-All supplemental exams were negative for PWSCC-Indication in CEDM 56 lacks PWSCC features-Indication is consistent with grain noise -Current evaluation methodology would conclude no defect is present in CEDM 56 5 Technical Presentation Overview-Background-Evaluation-Conclusion-Future plans regarding inspections and head replacement-Discussion 6*CEDM 56 identified as "s pecial interest" during reactor vessel head inspection in RFO 12 *Weld overlay was applied to J-groove weld and penetration OD surfaces to ensure that CEDM 56 was returned to service in a conservative configuration*Code Relief was needed to temporarily allow evaluation of a flaw having depth greater than 0.75 t pending final NDE evaluation and repair planning *Supplemental examination techniques were developed to investigate whether indication in CEDM 56 is PWSCC Background
7Background
Inspection & Repair History
- Cycle 12 refueling outage(RFO-12)Jan2003-SCE Commitment to NRC Bulletin 2002-01-Westinghouse demonstrated inspection technology
-Ultrasonic time of flight diffraction (TOFD) indications observed in 4 penetrations-Supplemental surface eddy current (ET) ruled out PWSCC
- Cycle 13 refueling outage(RFO-13) Oct2004-NRC Order EA-03-009 using Westinghouse demonstrated NDE-Indications in 4 CEDMs appeared to have grown -Supplemental ET data was not consistent with apparent growth-"Embedded Flaw" repairs implemented to ensure conservatism
-Indication in CEDM 56 exceeded Code limit for evaluation (figure1)
- Cycle 14 refueling outage (RFO-14) Oct2006-NRC Order EA-03-009 using Westinghouse demonstrated NDE-Supplemental NDE designed for CEDM 56-No discernable changes in CEDM 56 indication
8 Background
Figure 1 CEDM 56 Indication Profile 9>75%High Resolution TOFD NDDUltrasonic shear Wave (axial & circumferential)
NDD NDDOverlay PT (Surface)
NDDPenetration OD TOFD (informational)
NDD NDDPenetration OD ET (Surface)
NDD NDDJ-weld ET (Surface)
NDD NDD NDDID ET (Surface)
NDD NDD NDDLeak Path Assessment NDD NDD NDD Bare Metal (Visual)
SI / CBH SI SITOFD (Volumetric)
RFO-14 October 2006EA-03-009 RFO-13 October 2004EA-03-009 RFO-12January 2003Bulletin 02-01SI, Special InterestNDD, No Defect DetectedCBH, Cleared By HistoryBackground CEDM 56 Inspection DetailStandard ExaminationSupplemental Examination 10 Evaluation*Approach*Determination of No Growth*Inconsistent with Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking (PWSCC)*Review of Industry Experience 11 Evaluation Approach*WesDyne (Westinghouse)-Perform a consistent evaluation of base scope NDE data for indications of growth in CEDM 56 (and CEDMs 32, 57, and 64) from RFO 12, 13, and 14 -Assess supplemental NDE data from CEDM 56 to determine possibility of a PWSCC flaw-Evaluation and assessment performed by*Level III with extensive experience in RVH TOFD*Chief Engineer, recognized authority in NDE*ANATEC -Third party review of NDE data and Westinghouse evaluation*Level III with extensive experience in RVH TOFD*Concluded not attributable to PWSCC*SONGS Engineering -Analysis, review, oversight, and ownership of results 12 Evaluation Determination of No Growth*Reanalysis of all inspection data on a consistent basis concluded no discer nable change since first detected in RFO12.
74.4 % t-w*70.2 % t-w RFO 14 74.3 % t-w 77.6 % t-w RFO 13 74.4 % t-w 55.7 % t-w RFO 12 Reanalysis Original AnalysisRefueling outage* RFO14 High resolution probe positioned indication at just over 75% t-w(>0.75 t) 13 Evaluation Inconsistent with PWSCC*RFO 12 -Automated J-weld and OD Eddy Current concluded no surface connected PWSCC*ET is a very effective exam for detection of PWSCC surface & near surface connections*A 0.7" surface or near-surface crack is readily detected (figure 2)*Lack of surface connection refutes PWSCC-Indication was dispositioned as grain noise*Large population of distributed reflectors (figure 3) 14 Evaluation Inconsistent with PWSCC*RFO 13-Manual OD scan employing TOFD & ET (informal)*ET: No crack like features*TOFD: No lateral wave interruption-J-weld ET: No crack like features-No effect from repair on ID exam 15 Evaluation Inconsistent with PWSCC*RFO 14-Confirmed no discernable change-High Resolution probe measured maximum indication depth at just over 75% from OD surface (could not withdraw 0.75t relief request)-Ultrasonic shear wave exams detected no evidence of a crack-like flaw*No shadowing of distributed reflectors*Continuous observation of overlay weld interface (figure 4)-Axial crack would obscure view of overlay interface-Transparency of indication is consistent with grain noise, not PWSCC 16 Evaluation Review of Industry Experience*Beaver Valley (BV) J-weld and OD ET exams had clear detection of PWSCC-Indication in CEDM 56 penetration OD would be larger and more easily detected if PWSCC-CEDM 56 J-weld scan found no crack-like indications*BV TOFD included typical PWSCC characteristics that are lacking in CEDM 56-No loss of backwallsignal-Crack tip diffraction response not evident-Indication has not changed since detection*Application of updated WesDyne analysis procedures would determine CEDM 56 as NDD 17 Evaluation Technical Summary*Ultrasonic TOFD (tip diffraction) technology is very sensitive, and commonly detects normal material structures in addition to real defects-Real cracks affect TOFD inspection results in a predictable way*Backwall reflections should be suppressed over certain angles*Distributed reflectors should be obscured behind crack faces *Characteristic tip diffraction signal response-CEDM 56 penetration includes TOFD features typical of grain noise, and not PWSCC *Confirmed growth in a TOFD indication over time is compelling evidence of PWSCC-Uniform analysis of RFO 12, 13, and 14 examination data has concluded that no discernable change in indication has actually occurred*Supplemental NDE is standard practice for validating TOFD indications-Eddy Current is a reliable confirmatory test for PWSCC surface connection. Supplemental ET of J-weld & Penetration OD in RFO 12 and 13 refuted PWSCC hypothesis.-There was no shear wave obscuration of backwallfeatures or distributed reflectors which would be expected behind a crack face 18 Conclusion*Summary of Facts-PWSCC disposition in RFO 13 was based on refuted data-All supplemental exams were negative for PWSCC-Indication in CEDM 56 lacks PWSCC features-Indication is consistent with grain noise -Current Westinghouse evaluation methodology would conclude no defect is present in CEDM 56*SCE'sConclusion-The indication in CEDM 56 is not a defect -Code Relief for Flaw Evaluation is not required 19 Future Plans*Continue with EA-03-009 examinations every refueling outage *Respond to any new indications or unexpected changes as appropriate*Replace the SONGS 3 Reactor Vessel Head during RFO 17 (approximately Fall of 2012) 20 Licensing Licensing correspondence associated with CEDM 56 21*Relief Request ISI-3-8: -Contingency submitted prior to RFO 13 "Embedded Flaw" Repair (< 75% t-w) --
Used for 3 CEDMs during RFO 13*Submitted December 3, 2003*Supplemented March 15, 2004*Approved May 5, 2004
- No Commitmentsmade at this time Licensing 22 Licensing*Relief Request ISI-3-13: -Submitted during RFO 13 "Embedded Flaw" Repair (>75% t-w) Specifically for CEDM 56*Submitted October 26, 2004*Supplemented December 2, 2004**Approved December 23, 2004
SCE will identify a long-term repair method and implement that
repair in RFO 14 23 Licensing*Meeting with NRC Staff:-March 2, 2006, presented long term disposition of CEDM 56-Existing repair is adequate for one cycle-SCE will inspect to validate stability-SCE will submit 2 relief requests*If no discernable growth -Operate 1 cycle (ISI-3-21)*Contingency repair alternative (ISI-3-22)*Teleconference with NRC Staff-March 22, 2006, agreed to above approach 24 Licensing*Relief Request ISI-3-21:
Allowing 1 cycle of operation contingent upon no discernable
growth (<0.02")-Submitted May 11, 2006 (Prior to RFO 14)-Teleconference November 14, 2006 (During RFO 14)*-Supplemented November 20, 2006 (During RFO 14)**-Verbal Approval December 1, 2006 (During RFO 14)-Written Approval February 7, 2007
- SCE informed NRC no discernable growth
SCE to either reclassify as NDD and withdraw Relief Requests ISI-3-21
and ISI-3-22 or will repair during RFO 15 25 Licensing*Relief Request ISI-3-22:Contingency repair in RFO 14 to allow operation to RFO 15 if growth was greater than or equal to 0.02" (no discernable growth) 26 Licensing*Based on all information available to date, SCE reclassified the indication in CEDM 56 as NDD-August 31,2007, SCE documented completion of NDE evaluation and withdrew Relief Request ISI-3-21 27 Questions 28Beaver Valley ODCEDM 56Figure 2: Comparison of penetration tube ET results for OD PWSCC 29Figure 3: Vertical (UT) slice of CEDM 56 (gray section) showingindication and grain noise throughout penetration tube base material 30Figure 4: Unobstructed detection of OD weld overlay interface onCEDM 56 70° /40° circumferential shear wave UT analysis of CEDM 56Overlay weld interface