ML13008A054

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix B: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page B-1, Sheet 482 of 513 Through Appendix C: Area Walk-by Checklists, Sheet 85 of 212

ML13008A054
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	09/28/2012
From:	Lucarelli B A, Beigi F, Guerra E, Reddington J, Reny D ABS Consulting, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-12-283
Download: ML13008A054 (118)

Text

L;= -Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FMI-NGI[ Ft & U1M4s t I¶\tTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2PRI-PROC-2 Sheet 482 of 513 Status: W)N U Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Primary Process Control Panel 2 Location:

Bldg.CNTB Floor El. 707 Room CNTB 707 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Exterior of cabinet is welded to wide flange with 6" welds at corners and 2-8" welds in center. Wide flange anchored to floor with 3/8" anchor bolts every 3ft.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

LI XI Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x T -F DOQlPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F%(.IWE-RS&

CIONSL LTANIS Sheet 483 of 513 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2PRI-PROC-2 Equipment Description Primary Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Process Control Panel 2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Adjacent cabinets are bolted together.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached top conduit found with adequate flexibility

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/20 12 L--; Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 484 of 513 Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2PRI-PROC-2 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Primary Process Control Panel 2 Lents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-4-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID ile Name: 2-tL-4-2-bjtpeg

==

Description:==

View of Interior Components LPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 485 of513 ENG INEERS& & C)N'.I"L[,%IAN S Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2PRI-PROC-2 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Primary Process Control Panel 2 File Name: 2-63-4-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Interior Components UAT-VW File Name: 2-64-4-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Interior at Cabinet Base X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.UNGI~t kERS & k ON't tI IAN 11 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2PRI-PROC-2 Sheet 486 of 513 Status: W)N U Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Primary Process Control Panel 2 File Name: 2-73-4-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Interior at Cabinet Base ltle Name: Z-Y4-4-2-oo.Jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Opened Cabinet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 487 of513[E(NINEERS

& UNSILTANTS Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2PRI-PROC-2 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Primary Process Control Panel 2 File Name: 2-95-4-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

Adjacent Cabinets are Bolted Together File Name: 2-96-4-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

General View of Component L~Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.TNt tNH R' &ZOMNL I I %NIS Sheet 488 of 513 N U Status: (Y Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2PRI-PROC-2 Equip. Clas Equipment Description Primary Process Control Panel 2 ss 20. Instrument and Control Panels File Name: 2-97-4-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Base Weld rIY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc..ENGINEERS

& CONSI'LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2SEC-PROC-A Sheet 489 of 513 Status: (2)N U Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Emergency Control System Secondary Process Panel Location:

Bldg.CNTB Floor El. 707 Room CNTB 707 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Exterior of cabinet is welded to wide flange with 6" welds at corners 8" weld in center.Wide flange anchored to floor with 3/8" bolts every 3fi.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

LI X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I L~YPauil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.UX( t~.LR'& LONSL t FAST, Sheet 490 of 513 Status: ()N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2SEC-PROC-A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Emergency Control System Secondary Process Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Adjacent cabinets are bolted together.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached top conduit found with adequate flexibility

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X N Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U X Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U X II Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 177t---ýO Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 491 of513 EN(GINEER$

& CONSLITANTS Status: W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2SEC-PROC-A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Emergency Control System Secondary Process Panel Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-5-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-5-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

Adjacent Cabients are Bolted Together L IY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E-N(AINEUR, & t st1 I ANTS Sheet 492 of 513 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2SEC-PROC-A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Emergency Control System Secondary Process Panel File Name: 2-64-5-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Interior Components File Name: 2-73-5-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Flexible Top Conduit rle-V IY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Li::3k- 'ICPGIN.HRS

& ")ON('tTAN-M Sheet 493 of 513 N U Status: (Y)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2SEC-PROC-A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Equipment Description Emergency Control System Secondary Process Panel Control Panels File Name: 2-94-5-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

General View of Component File Name: 2-95-5-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Base Weld Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.i-mNtAN: [ R,q &

I ,NI Sheet 494 of 513 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2SEC-PROC-A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Emergency Control System Secondary Process Panel File Name: 2-97-5-2-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Base Weld and Wide Flange Anchor Bolt L M Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FNGIN.ERS

& COMAUITAMTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2NUC-INS Sheet 495 of 513 Status: (W)N U Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Ins Nuclear Instr System Location:

Bldg.CNTB Floor El. 735 Room Control Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

4 section cabinet, adjacent sections are bolted together.

Base of cabinet is bolted to wide flange beam with -1/2" diameter bolts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N II X I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A T x I Y N U x I -I L~YPaul C. Rizzo Associ~ates, I 1C.Sheet 496 of 513 Status: (W N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2NUC-INS Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Ins Nuclear lnstr System Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Control room ceiling main runners are supportedfrom concrete ceiling by wires at -4'spacing. Each ceiling tile (i.e., egg grating) is tied to the main runners at each of its.four corners and judged not to be a potential falling hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x I I I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 LýY Paul C. Rizzo, Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS& "IN.L'LT.Sh Sheet 497 of 513 Status: W)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2NUC-INS Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Ins Nuclear Instr System Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-7-2-07.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-98-1-2-U

-.jpeg

Description:

General View of Component

~IY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, inc.[ N(.1I, I R, & .OS' I 1,NNIs Sheet 498 of 513 Status: (2)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2NUC-INS Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Ins Nuclear Instr System File Name: 2-63-7-2-07.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Interior Components File Name: 2-73-7-2-07.jpeg

==

Description:==

Adjacent Cabinets Bolted Together

'IC' Paul C. Rizzo, Associates, Inc.LNNE'I[RS

& CONSLITW~TI Sheet 499 of 513 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2NUC-INS Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Ins Nuclear Instr System File Name: 2-95-7-2-07.jpeg

==

Description:==

Cabinet Bolted to W-Flange Beam File Name: 2-96-7-2-07.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Interior Components L-v vQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.'Mr [HIIR & LONMt'IFAN-T Sheet 500 of 513 Status: Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RK-2NUC-INS Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Ins Nuclear Instr System Pile Name: 2-97-7-2-U/jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Interior Components C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINLI RS & t,( 1 AN-rS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. TRF-2-8N Sheet 501 of 513 Status: (Y N U Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description Transformer For Substation 2-8 Location:

Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 730 Room Emerg SWGR AE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Coils are attached to the base skid with 4-3/4"diameter machine bolts. The skid is welded to floor embeds at corners (-2.5" @ 4"o.c. at each corner). Component is bolted to channels with two -11/2" diam bolts per channel.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing 2001.180-307-13 IC confirms anchor weld configuration of 2-2.5" long welds at corners.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N LIIUIIIZ Y N U N/A x 7 Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I MM(;IN~RS&

L, 0!S t. I.' I.VS IS Sheet 502 of 513 Status: (Y)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. TRF-2-8N Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description Transformer For Substation 2-8 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached conduits have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Bus duct at the top of the transformer to 480 V BUS 2N judged structurally adequate.Buses exiting transfbrmer housing are judged to be adequately insulated from the housing.Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/ 10/20 12 L-vI%" Paul C. RiZzo Associatc.s, Inc.Sheet 503 of 513 N U Status: (Y)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. TRF-2-8N Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description Transformer For Substation 2-8 Other si or relevant documents and photos (if any): F 2-8N TRANSFORINBIER TR AT VIER 4iGOV-480V

"'c. -2E 1 1 PWRR ,,-OURGEý 4KV File Name: TRF2-8N(2).jpg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: TRF2-8N(3).jpg

==

Description:==

General View of Component Sheet 504 of 513 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.N( N IbE t R I& t' I ANTS Status: (t) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. TRF-2-8N Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description Transformer For Substation 2-8 File Name: TRF2-8N(l).jpg

==

Description:==

View of Top Conduits File Name: TRF2-8N(4).jpg

==

Description:==

View of Bus Duct L~Y~1Paul C. Rizzo Assoaciatcs, Inc.Sheet 505 of 513 Status: ()N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. UPS-VITBS2-1 Equipment Description Vital BI Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters JS Uninterruptible Power Location:

Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 730 Room Emerg SWGR AE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Adjacent to UPS- VITBS2-I-REG.

Two section UPS welded to 3 base HSS members with an average of 16"of weld at each support. HSS channels are welded to floor embeds with 24" of weld for each HSS.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing SK-E02-0376-E-1-5 confirms anchor weld configuration as 12" of weld (2"@3" o.c. for front and back) on each side of each HSS.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I

[I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associate~s, Inc.PIO't '.~R' &. L' 0ItI TAN-Ts Sheet 506 of 513 Status: (N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. UPS-VITBS2-1 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital BUS Uninterruptible Power Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Component is bolted to adjacent UPS-VITBS2-J-REG at top of cabinets.Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/20 12 Sheet 507 of 513 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.N(.INI 4RS &

Status: W) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. UPS-VITBS2-1 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital BUS Uninterruptible Power Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): rne iName:

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: UPS-VITBS2-1 (2).jpg

Description:

General View of Component rvllý Sheet 508 of 513[ ' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. UPS-VITBS2-1 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital BUS Uninterruptible Power rue iame: ur3-vi ii3,5-1ik3).jpg

==

Description:==

View of Anchorage File Name: UPS-VITBS2-1(4).jpg

==

Description:==

View of Flexible Top Lines L1 -q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS&

tON)SI4I\ANfS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. UPS-VITBS2-l-REG Sheet 509 of 513 Status: W N U Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description Vital BUS NO. I UPS Bypass Regulating Location:

Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 730 Room Emerg SWGR AE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Adjacent to UPS-VITBS2-1.

Supported by channels welded to HSS, and HSS welded to floor embeds with 24"of weld for each HSS.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing SK-E02-03 76-E- 1-5 confirms anchor weld configuration as 12" of weld (2"@3" o.c..for front and back) on each side of each HSS.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N I X I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x L Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.NOINEERS & )ONl I UVI.N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. UPS-VITBS2-I-REG Sheet 510 of 513 Status: W N U Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description Vital BUS NO. I UPS Bypass Regulating Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Component is bolted to adjacent UPS- VITBS2-1 at top of cabinets.Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 M Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet511of513 ENGINEER" & COINIS I1AN-Ts Status: 1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. UPS-VITBS2-I-REG Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description Vital BUS NO. 1 UPS Bypass Regulating Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): rue Name: u1'-vi t15!L-i-KLrt(/).Jpg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: UPS-VITBS2-1-REG(l).jpg

==

Description:==

View of Top Bolting of Cabinets L~YPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENX; IN E[RS& ~OINSV I AN-P, Sheet 512 of 513 Status: (W)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. UPS-VITBS2-1-REG Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description Vital BUS NO. 1 UPS Bypass Regulating File Name: UPS-VITBS2-1 -REG(3).jpg

==

Description:==

General View of Component File Name: UPS-VITBS2-1 -REG(4).jpg

==

Description:==

View of Anchorage Sheet 513 of 513 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.S;INERS & CONUL TANJ8 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. UPS-VITBS2-1-REG Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description Vital BUS NO. I UPS Bypass Regulating File Name: UPS-VITBS2-I -REG(5).jpg

==

Description:==

View of Flexible Top Lines APPENDIX C: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs)C-1 L[ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[NGINEERS

& CONSUL TANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 1 of 212 N U Status: (T Room AXLB 710 Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were identified

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CHS-FCVI 14A DCQJ, Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 2 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W) N U Room AXLB 710 Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)( ,p/Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 L----Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 3 of 212 INGINEERS

& CONSULTAN"YS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W)N U Room AXLB 710 Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-6-3-01.jpeg

==

Description:==

Area general view vile Name: 1-bU-6-3-01.jpeg

==

Description:==

Area general view Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FN(;INEERS

& CONW. [TAN-IS Sheet 4 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room AXLB 7 10 Boron Tank Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions identified in the area 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2SIS-MOV867A Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEtRS

& CON L Sheet 5 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: ()Room AXLB 7 10 Boron Tank Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FNGINFERS I CONS ITANI$Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room AXLB 710 Boron Tank Sheet 6 of 212 Status: (S)N U Floor El.710 Bldg. AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):-It rue Nrame: I-a-z-i-uI.Jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of valves in the area rile Name: i-ouo-.j-ui.jpeg

==

Description:==

Overall view of boron tank L~YPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

&. CONSULT&NUS Sheet 7 of 212 U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y Room AXLB 710 HX Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Most of 20-1" diam flange nuts at outlet nozzle for HX2CCP-E21C were identified with surface corrosion.

CR-2012-14459 was issued to address this finding.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Surface rust at base plate of small diameter tubing in the area was identified Judged not to be a concern.3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Wall mounted speaker located over 2SWS-PIJ 02C1 identified to be properly supported.

Judged not a concern for potential interaction.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CCP-E21A IY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.UMNINEERS

& CONMI [TANIS Sheet 8 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y a U Room AXLB 710 HX Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x -- T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

.......Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 L 41Z ' Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& O3NSU'TAN-IS Sheet 9 of 212 (a U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y Room AXLB 710 HX Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-4-3-0l.jpeg

==

Description:==

Drums in the area identified to be properly restrained Hle Name: 1-60-4-3-01.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffold identified in the area FVIY ý Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E \{,INIIRS

& VUNStLITANYS Sheet 10 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y a U Room AXLB 710 HX Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB rile Iuame: l-O.-,+-3-uI.Jpeg

==

Description:==

Pulley in the area noted to be properly restrained File Name: 1-66-4-3-01.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Heat Exchanger

[Q lPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONS'ITANTS Sheet 11 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y (0) U Room AXLB 710 HX Floor El.710 Bldg.AXLB File Name: 1-67-4-3-01 .jpeg

Description:

Mild corrosion identified on nuts of 2CCP-E2 IC outlet nozzle

'11C_ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.( \GINEERS & ONdS I TAN fS Sheet 12 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W)Room AXLB 718 Floor El.718 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWVEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Scaffolding located in the area. Judged not to present an interaction concern.4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CHS-HCVI86 2CHS-LCVl J5B 2CHS-MOV8132A 9~Qý Paul C. Rizzo Awsociates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTANIS Sheet 13 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W Room Floor El.AXLB 718 718 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

,7 Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012

~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.H"'.NE[RS

& (TNS( 11ANTS Sheet 14 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: ()Room AXLB 718 Floor El.718 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-3-3-02.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-60-3-3-02.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area IXQPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULT&\NIS Sheet 15 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (S Room AXLB 718 Floor El.718 Bldg.AXLB File Name: 1-65-3-3-02.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of scaffold in the area File Name: 1-66-3-3-02.jpeg

==

Description:==

Tag for seismic requirements for nearby scaffold

~QjPaul C. Rizzo Associates, In1C.I\ MANEERS. CONSUITANTS Sheet 16 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK Room Floor El.755 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were identified.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and conduits in the area were found to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CHS-SOV206 2CHS-TK21A D[ -- Paul C. Rizzo Asociates, Inc.t(NGINFERS 6, CONSLITANTS Sheet 17 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK Room Floor El.755 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regardingfire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 XY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I NAeINWERl- ANWC)Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 18 of 212 Status: (Y)N U Room Floor El.AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK Room 755 Bldg. AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): rile iName: i-Y-'t-.3-t4.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Boric Acid Tank Room rue IName.

==

Description:==

View of Boric Acid Tank and attached lines L~Y Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.ENG~(INEERS

& CC)NSV ITAN-B, Sheet 19 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W)Room AXLB 755 Boric Acid TK Room Floor El.755 Bldg.AXLB File Name: 1-65-4-3-04.jpeg

==

Description:==

Piping in the area identified to be rigidly supported.

'4C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.VNG(INEERS

& CONSI I TANVI Sheet 20 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W N U Room AXLB 755-MCC Room Floor El.755 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Duct and fan located in the room identified to be rigidly supported 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2HVP-CLC265A MCC-2-E03 I~Y Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.F \(dNEERS & CONRAI ANUS Sheet 21 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y N U Room AXLB 755-MCC Room Floor El.755 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012

~'Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.1 \tINEERS &. CONSUI lAN-IS Sheet 22 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)N U Room AXLB 755-MCC Room Floor El.755 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): rne iName: i-I-.-.)-u-4.jpeg

==

Description:==

Genral view of MCC Room rue iName:

==

Description:==

Nearby AC unit identified to be properly supported.

L~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[NGINEERS

& C'ONSVLtT&NIS Sheet 23 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y)Room AXLB 773 Surge Tank Floor El.773 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Steel platform identified in the area to be in good condition.

Wall mounted piping supports and transmitters identified to be rigidly supported.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CCP- TK21A

[I--1 Paul C. Rizzo Inc.I NGlNEERS & CONN I IANI S Sheet 24 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Room AXLB 773 Surge Tank Floor El.773 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x II Y N U l x I I I 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

.... .: , r3 .if 1 -Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 I~ZQPaul C. Rizzo A~sociates, Inc.ENGItNEERS

& CONSULTANTS Sheet 25 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: ()Room AXLB 773 Surge Tank Floor El.773 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-2-3-05.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of several small pipes with adequate wall supports tile Name: 1-60-2-3-U0.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of steel box sections used for pipe support and bracing L'qC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.MAN(,T.LRS

& OS F IUNd ANIS Sheet 26 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room AXLB 773 Surge Tank Floor El.773 Bldg.AXLB File Name: 1-65-2-3-05.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Surge Tank

'41;- Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.ENG .NEERS & CONSUITAN-N Sheet 27 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (ý)Room AXLB-CP-735 Floor El.735 Bldg.AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were identified.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping in the area was found to be rigidly supported 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2CHS-P21A L~'Q~Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FMA.NFERS..

INMi ITkNIS Sheet 28 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2) N U Room AXLB-CP-735 Floor El.735 Bldg.AXLB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

S-- _ " Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/20 12 IXY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENI'(.NF[RS

& .7ONSI ITAN " Sheet 29 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W Room AXLB-CP-735 Floor El.735 Bldg.AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-4-3-03.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area Pile Name: 1-6U-4-3-U3.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of ceiling and lighting fixtures

'QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.TN'tANEFRS

& C)ONSI I11AN-TS Sheet 30 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: N U Room Battery Room 2-1 Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Small AC unit identified to be tightly strapped to wall andjudged not a potential for interaction.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Lighting fixtures in the room judged ok.Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: BA T-2-1 Ve IQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FN(;LNEERS

& CONSI tTAN-IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 31 of 212 N U Status: (Y)Room Battery Room 2-1 Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x T -I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.tN%*\LNE[R

& CONSI ITA"I'Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Battery Room 2-1 Sheet 32 of 212 N U Status: T Floor El.730 Bldg. SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): rule Nrame: i-3Y-i-i--u.jpg

==

Description:==

General view of area L~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.TZ(,INEERS&

CONWI[AN'IS Sheet 33 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: T)Room CNTB 707 Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Several cabinets opened andJbund in acceptable condition.

Floor tiles were lifted and no missing anchors were identified for cabinet's base configuration.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays identified to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: PNL-2RPU-A RK-2A UX-REL-C RK-2PRI-PROC-1 RK-2PRI-PROC-2 RK-2SEC-PROC-A L 4C Paul C. Riz~o As~ociates, Inc.I \GINEERS & CON11 ITAMIS Sheet 34 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)N U Room CNTB 707 Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x T --T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

.7 Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012

-7=---ýEddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/20 12 rvX Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I\(.INEER¶S

& CONS1UIT&NfS Sheet 35 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room CNTB 707 Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-5-3-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of cabinet arrangement in the area and lighting fixtures tHiCe Name: 1-bU-i-U6b.jpeg

==

Description:==

Tag ID for cabinet opened for inside inspection 111cl Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SNOINE IRS & CONIL?'17ANI S Sheet 36 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room CNTB 707 Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB File Name: 1-65-5-3-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of opened cabinet

~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.t MNUENFRS &. (ONSVATAN US Sheet 37 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room CNTB 707 SW Corner Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Wall and floor mounted panels in the area were identified to be in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and conduits in the area were found to be rigidly supported 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: PNL- VITBS2-1A DQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.U.MN & ONSI I lAN-IS Sheet 38 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W N U Room CNTB 707 SW Comner Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Cart near cabinets was identified to be securely restrained.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 I Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012

'4C_ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

&. CONSULTAONTS Sheet 39 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W Room Floor El.CNTB 707 SW Comer 707 Bldg.CNTB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-4-3-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

South-west area with wall mounted panels 1nie Name: 1-bO-4-3-Ub.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of maintenance equipment properly tight to center column LDQI Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I \(,INFEIRS&5 CONSI tIAN IS Sheet 40 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room CNTB 707 SW Comer Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB-II File Name: 1-65-4-3-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of cart with locked wheels located near cabinets L~YPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.P NbINEERS & CON'I LTAN1'Sheet 41 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: T)Room CNTB 735-AC Room Floor El.735 Bldg.CNTB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Wall mounted instruments were identified to be in good condition and adequately anchored 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All piping and conduits are well supported in this area.Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2HVC-ACU2OIA

~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I \(;1NtL S CNtU MTNN-IS Sheet 42 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W) N U Room CNTB 735-AC Room Floor El.735 Bldg.CNTB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 7¢Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/ 10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/20 12 QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I NAINFERS & CONSLATAN[S Sheet 43 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room CNTB 735-AC Room Floor El.735 Bldg.CNTB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-2-3-07.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of attached lines on HVAC unit Pile Name: I-bU-2-3-O/.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component 2HVC-ACU201 A

L Y Paul C. Rizzo A~sociates, Inc.T\6N(EN EI:R &. CON't LTAN'-IS Sheet 44 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y) N U Room CNTB 735-AC Room Floor El.735 Bldg.CNTB rile Name: l-b)-2-3-u/.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of small diameter piping rigidly supported from wall iIN '4< Paul C. Rizzo A~ociates, Inc.UNG1NFERS

& CONVI TANrFS Sheet 45 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room Control BLDG MCC Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Control panel identified with protective glass to cover from potential falling objects.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and conduits in the area were found to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Lighting fixtures above control panel were identified to be properly restrained.

Judged not to present a potential interaction concern.Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: MCC-2-E09

~XQPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FMANR &Nf~~ CON)N r.&Na Sheet 46 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room Floor El.Control BLDG MCC 707 Bldg.CNTB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x T -I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 LveINO Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.F\C.INEElRS

& CONSL'LTA,1S Sheet 47 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)N U Room Control BLDG MCC Floor El.707 Bldg.CNTB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-3-3-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-60-3-3-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of control panel

C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I NCINFERS&

CONS11TANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Control BLDG MCC Floor El. 707 Bldg.Sheet 48 of 212 Status: Y)N U CNTB File Name: 1-65-3-3-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of cabinet arrangement in the area

'4<Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FM.1NE[RS

& CIONSMlTAN-S Sheet 49 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room Control Room Floor El.735 Bldg.CNTB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Control room ceiling main runners are supported from concrete ceiling by wires at-4' spacing. Each ceiling tile (i.e., egg grating) is tied to the main runners at each of its four corners andjudged not to be a potential falling hazard. Potential ceiling interaction with back panelsjudged not a concern as there are no sensitive relays in these panels and the interaction is judged to be unlikely.Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2HVR-TI228 2HVR- TI228-1 2RSS-TI150A PNL-2BLG-SER PNL- VITBS2-2C RK-2UNC-INS Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.tMA(IN[LRS

& CONSUITANIS Sheet 50 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W N U Room Control Room Floor El.735 Bldg.CNTB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No.flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Step ladder adjacent to radiation monitor instrumentation panel. Judged not a concern as the panel is marked non-seismically related 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?One of the doors for panel PNL-2FAL-REC can not positively be latched. Judged not a concern as there are no relays in this 3- panel line up.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x T --l Brian A. Lucarelli Evaluated by: Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 44IY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.UNGINEERS

& CONStITTAN-r,%

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room Control Room Sheet 51 of 212 Status: (W N U Floor El.735 Bldg. CNTB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):-4W IL File Name: ControlRm(l).jpg

==

Description:==

View of panel PNL-2FAL-REC was not positively latched.

I~IY~jPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I INES CONSI ItTAIS Sheet 52 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)N U Room Control Room Floor El.735 Bldg.CNTB File Name: ControlRm(3).jpg

==

Description:==

Step ladder located next to cabinet File Name: Control Rm(4).jpg

Description:

View of cabinet in the area I2C Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.VN(4NFEHR

& CONSI TTANMS Sheet 53 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room Control Room Floor El.735 Bldg.CNTB File Name: ControlRm(5).jpg

==

Description:==

View of control room ceiling and the back panels tue Name: uontroiKrtmo)jpg

==

Description:==

General view of ceiling grates.

A Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.lfNGINF'ERS

& C ONS[UITANIN Sheet 54 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W N U Room CV&RC Area-Reac-2T-SWGR Floor El.755 Bldg.MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?HVAC ducts and cable trays in the area were fbund to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 52 BYA 52 RTA R--% -Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.'4r N(INEERS & CONSULT&NTIS Sheet 55 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (N)Room CV&RC Area-Reac-2T-SWGR Floor El.755 Bldg.MSCV Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I -I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012

'Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSt ITAN-'S Sheet 56 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room CV&RC Area-Reac-2T-SWGR Floor El.755 Bldg.MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 1-59-2-3-15.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of cabinets in the area and lighting fixtures lite Name: I-tU-2-3-13jpeg

==

Description:==

View of conduits and cable trays in the area.

IXQ Paul C. Rizzo A~ociates, Inc.LNGINEERS

& CONAT'TANTS Sheet 57 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room EDG 2-1 Floor El.732 Bldg.DGBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?(moderate rust at yoke to bonnet of valve 2SWS-MO VI 13A. Refer to Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Sheet 336 of 513 for this component SWC and the corresponding CR).3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Piping and ducts in the area are rigidly supported 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2EGF-LIS203A 2EGF-P21A 2EGF- TK22A 2EGS-EG2-1 2SWS-MO V113A MCC-2-E07 PNL-2D1GEN-1

'41CQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, 1InC.INI ..NEERS, CON',I 11AN-US Sheet 58 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: N) N U Room EDG 2-1 Floor El.732 Bldg.DGBX Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x T -I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/7Z Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/ 10/20 12 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS&

CONSULI ANIS Sheet 59 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: T N U Room EDG 2-1 Floor El.732 Bldg.DGBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: EDG2-1(1).jpg

==

Description:==

General view of area showing pipe bracing members File Name: EDG2-1(2).jpg

==

Description:==

General view of cabinets in the area and lighting fixtures U, -- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SNGIlFE[RS

& ('ON% 1,TA.ai I Sheet 60 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room EDG 2-1 Floor El.732 Bldg.DGBX rie iName: rtuu/L-ik.).jpg

==

Description:==

View of fire extinguisher in the area rite iName: nukJL-uikt*).Jpg

==

Description:==

View of nearby restrained cabinet

[ vI Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[NGINEERS CONSU1TAN'TS Sheet 61 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W)N U Room EDG 2-1 Floor El.732 Bldg.DGBX File Name: EDG2-1(5).jpg

==

Description:==

Properly restrained ladder identified in the area vlle Name: v-utui-1(b).jpg

==

Description:==

View of scaffold located next to Diesel Generator LXQ~Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I \(.INELRS

& CONSI I IAYIS Sheet 62 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room EDG 2-1 Floor El.732 Bldg.DGBX File Name: EDG2-1(7).jpg

==

Description:==

View of restrained ladder in the area rue iName: nL"tJL- i k).jpg

Description:

View of restrained ladder in the area Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULTAN&-S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room EDG 2-1 Sheet 63 of 212 Status: (Y N U 732 Floor El.Bldg.DGBX File Name: EDG2-1(9).jpg

==

Description:==

View of lighting fixture with missing fluorescent tube.

~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.F \( NEERS & C0N.I ITANIS Sheet 64 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room EDG 2-1 Upstairs Floor El.759 Bldg.DGBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

DG muffler was identified to be rigidly supported.

Emergency DG ground resistor identified to be mounted on 4 porcelain supports.

Since this equipment is only used for periodic testing and is not CA T 1, it is judged to be adequate and not to present a seismic concern.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2HVD-DMP201A 2HVD-DMP22A 2HVD-FN270A L~ZQPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS,&

CONSL[TAN-LS Sheet 65 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room EDG 2-1 Upstairs Floor El.759 Bldg.DGBX Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 lPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[ N( 7NEURS & COW II : A N S Sheet 66 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: & N U Room EDG 2-1 Upstairs Floor El.759 Bldg.DGBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: EDG2-1_Up(1).jpg

==

Description:==

View of electrical equipment properly braced in the area File Name: EDG2-1lUp(2).jpg

==

Description:==

General view of DG exhaust muffler I Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FNGINEERS

& CONULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 67 of 212 N U Status: (W Room EDG 2-1 Upstairs Floor El.759 Bldg.DGBX File Name: EDG2-1_Up(3).jpg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: EDG2- 1Up(4)jpg

Description:

General view of area I'q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, In1C.I N(YINFERS.

&. CONSI LTAN IN Sheet 68 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: ()Room EDG 2-1 Upstairs Floor El.759 Bldg.DGBX File Name: EDG2-1_Up(5).jpg

==

Description:==

Properly restrained ladder identified in the area File Name: EDG2-1_Up(6).jpg

==

Description:==

View of DG ground resistor L Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[NGINEMRS

& CONSULTAN"rS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room EDG 2-1 Upstairs Sheet 69 of 212 Status: w)N U Floor El.759 Bldg.DGBX File Name: EDG2-1_Up(7).jpg

==

Description:==

DG resistor tag ID

~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 70 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y 8 U Room Emerg SWGR AE Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Conduits, ducts and cable trays are identified to be rigidly supported 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescent light fixtures are hung.from chains to ceiling and their swing in a seismic event could potentially hit top o/fthe 17 panel line-up. CR-2012-14463 was issued to address this situation.

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 480VUS-2-8 4KVS-2AE BAT-CHG2-1 BA T-CHG2-3 DC-SWBD2-1 PNL DC2-07 PNL DC2-19 PNL-SEQ-244 TRF-2-8N UPS- VITBS2-1 UPS- VITBS2-1-REG Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG.INEERSI

& CONSULT&NTrS Sheet 71 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y a U Room Emerg SWGR AE Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 DCQIl Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[1NINE-RS

& CONSl I TANiT Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet 72 of 212 U Status: Y Room Emerg SWGR AE Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): rue iName: ýw"JK Aink).Jpg

Description:

General view of area File Name: SWGR AE(2).jpg

Description:

General view of lighting fixtures and top cabinet conduits Sheet 73 of 212'RIC' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I N'INE.RS & CONSC Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y (a U Room Emerg SWGR AE Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB File Name: SWGR AE(3).jpg

Description:

Fire extinguisher located in the area File Name: SWGR AE(4).jpg

Description:

Storage box located in the area.

~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 74 of 212

& CONSIA &TA~S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y (a U Room Ernerg SWGR AE Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB File Name: SWGR AE(5).jpg

Description:

Properly restrained ladder identified in the area File Name: SWUR AE(6).jpg

Description:

View of ceiling conduits and lighting fixtures L~'YPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSULT&N 1S Sheet 75 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: Y (a) U Room Emerg SWGR AE Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB-II File Name: SWGR AE(7).jpg

Description:

Hanging light located close to cabinet.Interaction addressed in CR-2012-14463

'4C- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG~INEERS~&

({)NSIITA~rS Sheet 76 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W)Room Emerg SWGR DF Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 480 VUS-2-9 4KVS-2DF L'4C Paul C. Rizzo Ass~ociates, Inc.ENC.INEEPS

& CONSt LTAN-US Sheet 77 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room Emerg SWGR DF Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

1.5" diameter loops of cable is mounted on the side of BA T-CHG2-9 and may interact with panel. This isjudged not a concern since the charger is for maintenance purposes only.8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/ 10/20 12

~Q Paul C. Rizzo A~socates, Inc.Sheet 78 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room Emerg SWGR DF Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: SWGR DF(l).jpg

Description:

General view of electrical equipment in the area vile Name: NWUKL_)I(2).jpg

==

Description:==

General view of cabinets and lighting fixtures LqlY Paul C. Riz.zo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSI 7TAN-rS Sheet 79 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (Y)Room Emerg SWGR DF Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB File Name: SWGRDF(3).jpg

==

Description:==

View of cable trays above electrical cabinets File Name: SWGRDF(4).jpg

==

Description:==

Storage carts and ladders located in the area identified to be properly secured.

'111C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I\NGINFERS

&

Sheet 80 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: &Room Emerg SWGR DF Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB rile Name: iwtJKt(tjrt).jpg

==

Description:==

Fire hose located in the area tile Name: SwtJKL~t(o).jpg

==

Description:==

Fire extinguisher located in the area L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS

& CONSU LTANTS Sheet 81 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: (2)Room Emerg SWGR DF Floor El.730 Bldg.SRVB File Name: SWGRDF(7).jpg

==

Description:==

View of 1.5" diameter loops of cable mounted on the side of BAT-CHG2-9 1[-% 'A Paul C. Rizzo Associates,, Inc.Sheet 82 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W)Room FULB 729 PMP Room Floor El.729 Bldg.FULB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Related equipment on SWEL for this area: 2FNC-108 2FNC-EJM230A 2FNC-P21A L~Y Paul C. Rizzo Assiociates, Inc.UNGINEERS

& CUNSt:LTAN-TS Sheet 83 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W N U Room FULB 729 PMP Room Floor El.729 Bldg.FULB Interaction Effects 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?No flooding concern identified in this area.6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?No concerns identified regarding fire sources.7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x T --T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian A. Lucarelli Date: 10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/10/2012 DC%" Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.IN;NtS& CON'I tIANII Sheet 84 of 212 N U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Status: W Room FULB 729 PMP Room Floor El.729 Bldg.FULB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): tlle Name: i-:9-i-i-zq.jpeg

==

Description:==

Overall view of pumps in the area VlIe Name: i-w-i-i--29.Jpeg

==

Description:==

Ladder in the area identified to be properly restrained.

L['Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.U(NGINEERS

& CONSULIAT NIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Room FULB 729 PMP Room Floor El. 729 Bldg.Sheet 85 of 212 Status: (2)N U FULB File Name: 1-65-3-3-29.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of pipe lines attached to pumps in the area