05000461/FIN-2018002-03
From kanterella
Revision as of 00:28, 4 December 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Minor Violation |
Description | During the inspection quarter, the inspectors reviewed a significant number of licensee CAP documents to assess the following performance attributes: complete, accurate, and timely documentation of the identified problem in the CAP; evaluation and timely disposition of operability and reportability issues; consideration of extent of condition and cause, generic implications, common cause, and previous occurrences; classification and prioritization of the problems resolution commensurate with the safety significance; and identification of negative trends associated with human or equipment performance that can potentially impact nuclear safety. Minor Performance Deficiency: The inspectors determined that issues which could impact the operability of TS-related equipment were generally entered into the CAP in a timely manner. However, operability determinations were not always performed within the timeframes established in Section 4.1 of Procedure OPAA108115, Operability Determinations (CM1), because some issue reports were not directly routed to the operating shift crew for review. The CAP software program used by the licensee included a standard set of questions which were normally answered by the individual entering the issue into the CAP. Depending on the answers to the questions, the CAP document routing could automatically bypass the operating shift crew for review. Screening: This issue screened as minor because all the questions associated with a minor issue found in IMC 0612, Appendix B, were answered No. The inspectors did not identify any instance where the failure to perform a timely operability determination had a significant consequence on licensed activities. However, the inspectors discussed the vulnerability between the CAP and the operability determination process with the licensee. The licensee implemented a standing order to require a shift review by the operating crew of condition reports not directly routed to the shift. In addition, the licensee is trending the number of condition reports which are returned by the Station Ownership Committee to the shift for review to determine whether further actions are warranted.
Enforcement: The inspectors did not identify a violation of regulatory requirements associated with this minor finding because the procedure the licensee failed to follow was a self-imposed standard. |
Site: | Clinton |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000461/2018002 Section 4OA2 |
Date counted | Jun 30, 2018 (2018Q2) |
Type: | Violation: Severity level Minor |
cornerstone | No Cornerstone |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
Inspectors (proximate) | E Sanchez L Rodriguez D Sargis S Bell J Cassidy M Domke C Phillips S Mischke L Torres K Stoedter |
Violation of: | Technical Specification |
INPO aspect | |
' | |
Finding - Clinton - IR 05000461/2018002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Clinton) @ 2018Q2
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||