Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
Results
Other: ML13317A829, ML15061A089, ML15161A413, ML15261A550, RS-13-020, Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049), RS-13-030, Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), RS-13-035, Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), RS-13-118, First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), RS-13-119, First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049), RS-13-128, First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), RS-13-176, Response to Request to Additional Information - Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Commission Order Modifying License Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order No. EA-12-051), RS-15-019, Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049), RS-15-028, Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), RS-15-202, Fifth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), RS-16-004, Report of Full Compliance with March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)
|
MONTHYEARRS-13-020, Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2013-02-28028 February 2013 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049) Project stage: Other RS-13-035, Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)2013-02-28028 February 2013 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) Project stage: Other RS-13-030, Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)2013-02-28028 February 2013 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) Project stage: Other ML13177A0642013-06-26026 June 2013 Request for Additional Information Regarding Overall Integrated Plan for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Project stage: RAI RS-13-159, Response to Request for Additional - Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Commission Order Modifying License Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation2013-07-0303 July 2013 Response to Request for Additional - Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Commission Order Modifying License Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Project stage: Request RS-13-176, Response to Request to Additional Information - Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Commission Order Modifying License Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order No. EA-12-051)2013-07-18018 July 2013 Response to Request to Additional Information - Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Commission Order Modifying License Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order No. EA-12-051) Project stage: Other RS-13-118, First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)2013-08-28028 August 2013 First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) Project stage: Other RS-13-119, First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2013-08-28028 August 2013 First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049) Project stage: Other RS-13-128, First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)2013-08-28028 August 2013 First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) Project stage: Other ML13275A1112013-10-29029 October 2013 Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Implementation of Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Project stage: RAI ML13317A8292013-11-20020 November 2013 Mega-Tech Services, LLC Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Units 2 and 3, TAC Nos.: MF1046 and MF1047 Project stage: Other ML13220A2382013-11-22022 November 2013 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-12-049 - Mitigation Strategies Project stage: Acceptance Review ML13318A9532013-11-26026 November 2013 Request for Additional Information Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Order EA-12-051, Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Project stage: RAI RS-15-019, Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2015-02-27027 February 2015 Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049) Project stage: Other ML15061A0892015-02-27027 February 2015 Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) Project stage: Other RS-15-028, Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)2015-02-27027 February 2015 Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) Project stage: Other ML15161A4132015-06-11011 June 2015 Plan for the Onsite Audit Regarding Implementation of Mitigating Strategies and Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Related to Orders EA-12-049 and EA-12-051 Project stage: Other RS-15-202, Fifth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)2015-08-28028 August 2015 Fifth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) Project stage: Other ML15261A5502015-10-0909 October 2015 Report for the Onsite Audit Regarding Implementation of Mitigating Strategies and Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Related to Orders EA-12-049 and EA-12-051 Project stage: Other RS-16-004, Report of Full Compliance with March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)2016-01-12012 January 2016 Report of Full Compliance with March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) Project stage: Other 2013-07-18
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Letter type:RS
MONTHYEARRS-24-070, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Nine Mile Point, Units 1 and 2, Quad Cities, Units 1 and 2, R. E. Ginna - Nuclear Radiological Emergency Plan Document Revisions2024-07-12012 July 2024 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Nine Mile Point, Units 1 and 2, Quad Cities, Units 1 and 2, R. E. Ginna - Nuclear Radiological Emergency Plan Document Revisions RS-24-061, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2024-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2024-06-14014 June 2024 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2024-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations RS-24-053, Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed2024-06-0606 June 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed RS-24-055, 2023 Corporate Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report2024-05-17017 May 2024 2023 Corporate Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report RS-24-042, Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion2024-05-10010 May 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion RS-24-046, 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report2024-05-0606 May 2024 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report RS-24-041, Alternative Request to Utilize Code Case OMN-32, Alternative Requirements for Range and Accuracy of Pressure, Flow, and Differential Pressure Instruments Used in Pump Tests2024-04-30030 April 2024 Alternative Request to Utilize Code Case OMN-32, Alternative Requirements for Range and Accuracy of Pressure, Flow, and Differential Pressure Instruments Used in Pump Tests RS-24-032, Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion2024-04-0505 April 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion RS-24-002, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Annual Property Insurance Status Report2024-04-0101 April 2024 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Annual Property Insurance Status Report RS-24-019, Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF2024-03-19019 March 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Completion Times TSTF RS-24-020, Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 and 10 CFR 72.214 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station - Holtec MPC-68MCBS2024-03-15015 March 2024 Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR 72.212 and 10 CFR 72.214 for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station - Holtec MPC-68MCBS RS-24-015, Submittal of RP-01 Relief Request Associated with the Sixth Inservice Testing Interval2024-02-29029 February 2024 Submittal of RP-01 Relief Request Associated with the Sixth Inservice Testing Interval RS-24-001, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request I5R-26, Inservice Inspection Program Relief Request Regarding Examination Coverage for the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval2024-01-0303 January 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request I5R-26, Inservice Inspection Program Relief Request Regarding Examination Coverage for the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval RS-23-128, Response to Request for Additional Information for the Emergency License Amendment Request Increase Technical Specifications Completion Time in TS 3.8.1.B.4 from 7 Days to 30 Days2023-12-15015 December 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information for the Emergency License Amendment Request Increase Technical Specifications Completion Time in TS 3.8.1.B.4 from 7 Days to 30 Days RS-23-123, Emergency License Amendment Request - Increase Technical Specifications Completion Time in TS 3.8.1.B.4 from 7 Days to 30 Days2023-12-13013 December 2023 Emergency License Amendment Request - Increase Technical Specifications Completion Time in TS 3.8.1.B.4 from 7 Days to 30 Days RS-23-104, Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-11-17017 November 2023 Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation RS-23-113, Submittal of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 17 and Fire Protection Report (Fpr), Revision 262023-10-20020 October 2023 Submittal of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 17 and Fire Protection Report (Fpr), Revision 26 RS-23-097, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Advisement of Leadership Changes and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans2023-10-12012 October 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Advisement of Leadership Changes and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans RS-23-089, Sixth Ten-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program2023-09-0505 September 2023 Sixth Ten-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program RS-23-080, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-264-A, Revision 0, 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 - Delete Flux Monitors Specific Overlap Requirement SRs2023-08-30030 August 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-264-A, Revision 0, 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 - Delete Flux Monitors Specific Overlap Requirement SRs RS-23-086, Relief Request I5R-26, Inservice Inspection Program Relief Request Regarding Examination Coverage for the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval2023-08-28028 August 2023 Relief Request I5R-26, Inservice Inspection Program Relief Request Regarding Examination Coverage for the Fifth Inservice Inspection Interval RS-23-077, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-06-16016 June 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations RS-23-059, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4b2023-06-0808 June 2023 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4b RS-23-060, Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors2023-06-0808 June 2023 Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors RS-23-042, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling2023-05-25025 May 2023 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling RS-22-067, 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report2023-05-0404 May 2023 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report RS-23-068, Response to Request for Additional Information for Quad Cities Relief Request I6R-11, Proposed Alternatives for a Temper Bead Weld Repair of the Mating Surfaces of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Head and Shell2023-04-28028 April 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information for Quad Cities Relief Request I6R-11, Proposed Alternatives for a Temper Bead Weld Repair of the Mating Surfaces of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Head and Shell RS-23-058, Submittal of Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval Relief Request I6R-11 Proposed Alternatives for a Temper Bead Weld Repair of the Mating Surfaces of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Head and Shell Flanges2023-04-24024 April 2023 Submittal of Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval Relief Request I6R-11 Proposed Alternatives for a Temper Bead Weld Repair of the Mating Surfaces of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Head and Shell Flanges RS-23-049, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations2023-03-23023 March 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations RS-23-007, Application to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR2023-03-0303 March 2023 Application to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR RS-23-045, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC Submittal of Fitness for Duty Performance Data Reports for 2022 Per 10 CFR 26.717(c) & 10 CFR 26.2032023-02-28028 February 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC Submittal of Fitness for Duty Performance Data Reports for 2022 Per 10 CFR 26.717(c) & 10 CFR 26.203 RS-23-032, Application to Move SR 3.5.1.2 Note to LCO 3.5.1 in Accordance with TSTF-416, LPCI Valve Alignment Verification Note Location2023-02-0303 February 2023 Application to Move SR 3.5.1.2 Note to LCO 3.5.1 in Accordance with TSTF-416, LPCI Valve Alignment Verification Note Location RS-23-034, Notification of Extension to the Fifth Ten-Year Interval of the Inservice Testing Program2023-02-0202 February 2023 Notification of Extension to the Fifth Ten-Year Interval of the Inservice Testing Program RS-23-003, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Summary of Changes to Quality Assurance Topical Report, NO-AA-10, and Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, NO-DC-102023-01-31031 January 2023 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Summary of Changes to Quality Assurance Topical Report, NO-AA-10, and Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, NO-DC-10 RS-23-033, Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b)2023-01-27027 January 2023 Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 2.109(b) RS-23-005, Response to Request for Additional Information for Quad Cities Relief Request RV-04, Inservice Testing of High Pressure Coolant Injection Drain Pot Solenoid Valves2023-01-17017 January 2023 Response to Request for Additional Information for Quad Cities Relief Request RV-04, Inservice Testing of High Pressure Coolant Injection Drain Pot Solenoid Valves RS-22-127, Submittal of Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval Relief Request I6R-10 Reactor Pressure Vessel Penetration N-11B Repair2022-12-14014 December 2022 Submittal of Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval Relief Request I6R-10 Reactor Pressure Vessel Penetration N-11B Repair RS-22-126, Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Request to Use Provisions of a Later Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI2022-11-30030 November 2022 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC - Request to Use Provisions of a Later Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI RS-22-119, Withdrawal of Relief Request RV-11 Associated with the Sixth Inservice Testing Interval2022-10-31031 October 2022 Withdrawal of Relief Request RV-11 Associated with the Sixth Inservice Testing Interval RS-22-109, Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendments Related to Fuel Storage2022-10-12012 October 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information License Amendments Related to Fuel Storage RS-22-112, Submittal of RV-04 Relief Request Associated with the Sixth Inservice Testing Interval2022-10-0707 October 2022 Submittal of RV-04 Relief Request Associated with the Sixth Inservice Testing Interval RS-22-108, Response to Request for Additional Information LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 and Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 License Amendments Related to Fuel Storage2022-10-0505 October 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 and Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 License Amendments Related to Fuel Storage RS-22-092, Nine and Quad Cities - Application to Revise Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation Technical Specifications in Accordance with TSTF-306, Revision 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration2022-10-0303 October 2022 Nine and Quad Cities - Application to Revise Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation Technical Specifications in Accordance with TSTF-306, Revision 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration RS-22-093, Advisement of Leadership Changes for Constellation Energy Generation, LLC and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans2022-08-18018 August 2022 Advisement of Leadership Changes for Constellation Energy Generation, LLC and Submittal of Updated Standard Practice Procedures Plans RS-22-102, Supplement to Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.1.4, Control Rod Scam Times2022-08-18018 August 2022 Supplement to Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.1.4, Control Rod Scam Times RS-22-095, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Request to Expand Applicability of GNF Thermal Mechanical Analysis Methods to Framatome Fuel2022-08-10010 August 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Request to Expand Applicability of GNF Thermal Mechanical Analysis Methods to Framatome Fuel RS-22-096, Response to Request for Additional Information Related to Relief Request I6R-01 Associated with the Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval2022-08-10010 August 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to Relief Request I6R-01 Associated with the Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval RS-22-098, Response to Request for Additional Information for Quad Cities Relief Request RV-11, Code Case OMN-282022-08-0101 August 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information for Quad Cities Relief Request RV-11, Code Case OMN-28 RS-22-094, Submittal of Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval Relief Request I6R-09 to Permit Continued Application of Certain ASME Section XI 2013 Edition Non-Destructive Examination Requirements2022-07-25025 July 2022 Submittal of Sixth Inservice Inspection Interval Relief Request I6R-09 to Permit Continued Application of Certain ASME Section XI 2013 Edition Non-Destructive Examination Requirements RS-22-090, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Quad Cities New Fuel Storage Vault and Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodologies2022-07-13013 July 2022 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Quad Cities New Fuel Storage Vault and Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodologies 2024-07-12
[Table view] Category:Operating Plan
[Table view] |
Text
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Integrated Plan Report to EA-12-051 February 28, 2013 Reference 3, Appendix A-2 contains the specific reporting requirements for the Overall Integrated Plan. The information in the enclosure provides the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan pursuant to Appendix A-2 of Reference 3. The enclosed Integrated Plan is based on conceptual design information. Final design details and associated procedure guidance, as well as any revisions to the information contained in the Enclosure, will be provided in the 6-month Integrated Plan updates required by Reference 1.
This letter contains no new regulatory commitments. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact David P. Helker at 610-765-5525.
Enclosure:
1.Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) Overall Integrated Plan NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 NRC Project Manager, NRR - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Mr. Robert J. Fretz, Jr, NRRIJLD/PMB, NRC Illinois Emergency Management Agency - Division of Nuclear Safetyth J.
(9 pages)
(9
of Order EA-12-051
-
Quad Cities Station is a two unit BWR Station. The two units share a common ReactorBuilding (RB) refueling floor and two interconnected Spent Fuel Pools (SFP). Normal SFP water level is approximately at elevation 689' 6". Top of the spent fuel racks is elevation 666' 2" and top of active fuel is elevation 665' 5" (Ref. 5).Note: In all subsequent discussions in this plan unless otherwise noted, dimensions will be referenced to elevation 666' 2" which is the top of the fuel racks in either unit.
The installation of reliable level instrumentation for the SFPs associated with Unit 1 and Unit 2 is scheduled for completion by the end of Q1 R23 (Spring 2015) based on the end of the second refueling outage for Unit 1 following submittal of this integrated plan. This is the earlier outage sequence of the units discharging to the pools. Unit 1 and Unit 2 discharge irradiated fuel to a set of two interconnected spent fuel storage pools.
With the exception of limited time periods for maintenance or non-refueling operations, administrative controls maintain the gates between the following pools open: Unit 1 SFP and the Transfer Canal, and Unit 2 SFP and the Transfer Canal. Thus, the Unit 1 and Unit 2 pools are normally interconnected and at the same water level when the water level in either SFP is 1 foot above the top of the spent fuel storage racks.
Complete and Issue SFPI Modification PackageComplete SFPI Installation and Put Into Service For both units, indicated level on either primary or backup instrument channel must be greater than 23 feet 1 inch (elevation 689' 3") plus instrument accuracy above the top of the storage racks based on the design accuracy of the instrument channel (which is to be determined) and a resolution of 1 foot or better for both the primary and backup instrument channels. This is based on the 11 inch opening of the SFP weir gate design demonstrating a water level above 23 feet 1 inch (elevation 689' 3") is adequate for normal fuel pool cooling system operation.
For both units, indicated level on either the primary or backup instrument channel of greater than 10 feet (elevation 676' 2") plus instrument channel accuracy above the top of the storage racks basedon specification of this level as adequate in NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 (Ref. 2) and NEI 12-02 (Ref. 3), the specified design accuracy of the instrument channel, and the relatively low sensitivity of dose rates to changes in water depth at this level. Thismonitoring level ensures there is an adequate water level to provide substantial radiation shielding for a person standing on the spent fuel pool operating deck from direct gamma radiation from stored spent fuel.
202013 202013 102014 402014 102015 2
For both units, indicated level on either the primary or backup instrument channel of greater than 0 feet (elevation 666' 2")
plus instrument channel accuracy above the top of the storage racks based upon the design accuracy (which is to be determined) of the instrument channel for both the primary and backup instrument channels. This monitoring level assures that water is covering the stored fuel seated in the racks.
The design of the instruments will be consistent with the guidelines of NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 (Ref. 2) and NEI 12-02 (Ref. 3). Specifically, the channels will be designed as discussed below:
The primary instrument channel level sensing components will be located and permanently mounted in the Unit 1 SFP. The primary instrument channel will provide continuous level indication over a minimum range of approximately 23 feet 7 inches from the high pool level elevation of 689' 9" (Normal + 3") to the top of the spent fuel racks at elevation 666' 2". This continuous level indication will be provided by a guided wave radar system, submersible pressure transducer, or other appropriate level sensing technology that will be
determined during the detailed engineering design phase of the project.
The backup instrument channel level sensing components will be located and permanently mounted in the Unit 2 SFP. The backup instrument channel will provide continuous level indication over a range from the high pool level elevation the same as primary to the top of the spent fuel racks at elevation the same as primary. This continuous level indication will be provided by the same level sensing technology as the primary instrument channel.
Reliability of primary and backup instrument channels will be assured by conformance with the guidelines of NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 (Ref. 2) and NEI 12-02 (Ref. 3) as discussed below under Design Features and Program Features sections. Both primary and backup level instrumentation channels will be functional at all times when there is fuel in the SFP with allowance for maintenance, testing or repair as described in NEI 12-02 (Ref. 3).
Reliability will be established through the use of an augmented quality assurance process (e.g., a process similar to that applied to the site fire protection program).
3
Instrument channel design will be consistent with the guidance of NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 (Ref. 2) and NEI 12-02 (Ref. 3).
The current plan is to install SFP level sensors in the southwest corner of the Unit 1 SFP and in the northwest corner of the Unit 2 SFP separated by a distance in excess of 50 feet. The sensors themselves will be mounted, to the extent practical, near the pool walls and below the pool curb to minimize their exposure to damaging debris and not interfere with SFP activities. Instrument channel electronics and power supplies will be located in seismic and missile protected areas either below the SFP operating floor or in buildings other than the RB.The areas to be selected will provide suitable radiation shielding and environmental conditions for the equipment consistent with instrument manufacturer's recommendations.
Equipment and cabling for power supplies and indication for each channel will be separated equivalent to that provided for redundant safety related services as required by the Quad Cities design basis.
Design of the mounting of the sensors in the SFP shall be consistent with the seismic Class I criteria. Installed equipment will be verified to be seismically adequate for the seismic motions associated with the maximum seismic ground motion considered in the design of the plant area in which it is installed.
Reliability of both instrument channels will be demonstrated via an appropriate combination of design, analyses, operating experience, and/or testing of
channel components for the following sets of parameters:conditions in the area of instrument channel component use for all instrument components,
Temperature, humidity and radiation levels consistent with the conditions in the vicinity of the SFP and the area of use considering normal operation, event and post-event conditions for no fewer than seven days post-event or until off-site resources 4
can be deployed by the mitigating strategies resulting from Order EA-12-049 (Ref. 4) will be addressed in the detailed design engineering phase of the project. Examples of post-event (beyond-design-basis) conditions to be considered are:radiological conditions for a normal refueling quantity of freshly discharged (100 hour0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />) fuel with SFP water level 3 as described in Order EA-12-051,temperature of 212 degrees F and 100% relative humidity environment,boiling water and/or steam environment, Components of the instrument channels will be qualified for shock and vibration using one or more of the following methods:components are supplied by manufacturers using commercial quality programs (such as ISO9001, "Quality management systems -Requirements")
with shock and vibration requirements included in the purchase specification at levels commensurate with portable hand-held device or transportation applications;components have substantial history of operational reliability in environments with significant shock and vibration loadings, such as portable hand-held device or transportation applications; or For seismic effects on instrument channel components used after a potential seismic event for only installed components (with the exception of battery chargers and replaceable batteries), the following measures will be used to verify that the design and installation is adequate.
Applicable components are rated by the manufacturer (or otherwise tested) for seismic effects at levels commensurate with those of postulated design basis event conditions in the area of instrument channel component use using one or more of the following methods:
5 Quad Cities instrument channel components use known operating principles and are supplied by manufacturers with commercial quality programs (such as IS09001). The procurement specification and/or instrument channel designshall include the seismic requirements and specify the need for commercial design and testing under seismic loadings consistent with design basis values at the installed locations;substantial history of operational reliability in environments with significant vibration, such as for portable hand-held devices or transportation applications.
Such a vibration design envelope shall be inclusive of the effects of seismic motion imparted to the components proposed at the location of the proposed installation;adequacy of seismic design and installation is demonstrated based on the guidance in Sections 7, 8, 9, and 10 of IEEE Standard 344-2004, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Qualification of Class 1 E Equipment forNuclear Power Generating Stations", or a substantially similar industrial standard;demonstration that proposed devices are substantially similar in design to models that have been previously tested for seismic effects in excess of the plant design basis at the location where the instrument is to be installed (g-levels and frequency ranges); or The primary instrument channel will be independent of the backup instrument channel. This independence will be achieved through physical and electrical separation of each channels' components commensurate with hazard and electrical isolation needs.
Each channel will be normally powered from a different 120Vacbus.Upon loss of normal ac power, individual channel installed batteries will automatically maintain continuous channel operation. The batteries will be replaceable and be sized to maintain channel operation until off-site resources can be deployed by the mitigating strategies resulting from Order EA-12-049 (Ref. 4).6
Additionally, each channel will have provisions for connection to another suitable power source.
The instrument channels will be designed to maintain their design accuracy following a power interruption or change in power source without recalibration. Instrument channel accuracy, to be determined during detailed design, will consider Spent Fuel Pool conditions (e.g., saturated water, steam environment, concentrated borated water), as well as other applicable radiological and environmental conditions, and include display accuracy.
Instrument channel accuracy will be sufficient to allow trained personnel to determine when the actual level exceeds the specified lower level of each indicating range (levels 1, 2 or 3) without conflicting or ambiguous indications.
Instrument channel design will provide for routine testing and calibration consistent with the guidelines of NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 (Ref. 2) and NEI 12-02 (Ref.
3).Details will be determined during detailed design engineering.
The primary and backup instrument displays will be located at the control room, alternate shutdown panel, or other appropriate and accessible location. Thespecific location will be determined during detailed design.An appropriate and accessible location will include the following characteristics:
occupied or promptly accessible to the appropriate plant staff giving appropriate consideration to various drain down scenarios,outside the area surrounding the SFP floor (e.g., an appropriate distance from the radiological sources resulting from an event impacting the Spent Fuel Pool), i inside a structure providing protection against adverse weather, and outside of any Very High radiation areas or LOCKED HIGH RAD AREA during normal operation.
Personnel performing functions associated with these SFP level instrumentation channels will be trained to perform the job specific functions
necessary for their assigned tasks (maintenance, calibration, surveillance, etc.). This training will be consistent with equipment vendor guidelines, instructions and recommendations. The Systematic Approach to Training (SAT) will be used to identify the population to be trained and to determine the initial and continuing elements of the required training. Training will be completed prior to placing the instrumentation in service.
Procedures will be developed using guidelines and vendor instructions to address the maintenance, operation and abnormal response issues associated with the primary and backup channels of SFP instrumentation.If, at the time of an event or thereafter until the unit is returned to normal service, an instrument channel ceases to function, its function will be recovered within a period of time consistent with the emergency conditions that may exist at the time.If, at the time of an event or thereafter until the unit is returned to normal service, an instrument channel component must be replaced, it may be replaced with a commercially available component that may or may not meetall of the qualifications noted above to maintain instrument channel functionality.
The testing and calibration of the instrumentation will beconsistent with vendor recommendations or other documented basis. Calibration will be specific to the mounted instruments and the displays. Instrument performance will be trended as described in Exelon procedural requirements.
Quad Cities is not requesting relief from the requirements of Order EA-12-051 (Ref. 1) or the guidance in NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 (Ref. 2) at this time.Consistent with the requirements of Order EA-12-051 (Ref. 1) and the guidance in NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 (Ref. 2), Exelon's six-month reports will delineate progress made, any proposed changes in compliance methods, updates to the schedule, and if needed, requests for relief and their basis.
calibration, 8
2.NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2012-03, Compliance with Order EA-12-051, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, Revision 0, dated August 29, 2012 3.NEI 12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation", Revision 1, dated August 24, 2012 4.NRC Order Number EA-12-049, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigating Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events, dated March 12, 2012 5.Quad Cities UFSAR Chapter 9.19