ML070290370

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:39, 25 October 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Us Geological Survey Triga Reactor Annual Report, January 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006
ML070290370
Person / Time
Site: U.S. Geological Survey
Issue date: 01/19/2007
From: DeBey T M
US Dept of Interior, Geological Survey (USGS)
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML070290370 (6)


Text

U USGS science for a changing world Department of the Interior" US Geological Survey*Box25046 MS-974 ;" Denver CO; 80225 January 19, 2007 U.S. NuclearRegulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555

Dear NRC staff:

The attached annual report of the U.S. Geological Survey TRIGA non-power reactor facility is submitted in accordance with license conditions.

The facility docket number is 50-274. -, Sincerely, Timothy M. DeBey Reactor Supervisor Enclosure Copy to: Al Adams, MS 0-11 -D-1 9 7ý02_0 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TRIGA REACTOR ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY 1, 2006 -DECEMBER 31, 2006 NRC LICENSE NO. R-1 13--DOCKET NO. 50-274 1. Personnel Changes: One Senior Reactor Operator staff member retired on January 20, 2006 after about 37 years of service at the facility.II. Operating Experience The Geological Survey TRIGA Reactor (GSTR) was in normal operation for the year 2006. No major facility changes were made during the year.A synopsis of irradiations performed during the year is given below, listed by the organization submitting the samples to the reactor staff: Organization Geologic Discipline

-INAA Geologic Discipline

-Geochronology Non-USGS Total Number of Samples 944 351 941 2236 A. Thermal power calibrations were performed in February and August, with minor adjustments made to the instrumentation.

B. During the report period, 160 daily checklists and 12 monthly checklists were completed in compliance with technical specifications requirements for surveillance of the reactor facility.C. Tours were provided to individuals and groups during the year for a total visitor count of approximately 300.I 111. Tabulation of Enerav Generated Jan Feb Mar-Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Totals MWH operated 26.428 30.494 30.337 34.700 61.167 49.422 24.846 47.433 53.766 29.950 39.082 21.794 449.419 Critical hours 30h 35m 44h 46m 32h 36m 36h 21m 62h 02m 51h 51m 27h 19m 49 00m 55h 21m 31h 20m 40h 12m 26h 47m 488h 10m Pulses, 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 IV. Unscheduled Shutdowns Number 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 Date 2/1/06 2/8/06 312/06 3/30/06 5/18/06 5/18/06 5/30/06 5/30/06 9127106 9/27/06 9/28/06 11/17/06 12/8/06 Cause NP1 000 hi power during square wave training DAC DIS064 timeout DAC DIS064 timeout NP1000 hi power during square wave training Network fault DAC DIS064 timeout DAC DIS064 timeout'DAC DIS064 timeout NPP low high voltage DAC DIS064 timeout NPP 1000 hi power while going to full power NPP1000 hi power; transient rod UP switch failed shut and caused continuous rod withdrawal DAC DIS064 timeout V.Sigqnificant Maintenance Operations 1.2.3.4.5.The two console cooling fans were replaced in April.The secondary cooling pump shaft packing was replaced in April.The magnet for the Shim 1 rod drive was replaced in July.The ion exchange resin was replaced in July.The transient rod UP switch was replaced in November.2 VI. Summary of 10 CFR 50.59 changes No 50.59 changes were made during this year.VII. Radioactivity Releases A. Listed below are the total amounts of radioactive gaseous effluent released to the environment beyond the effective control of the reactor facility.Table 1. Gaseous Effluents Released to the Environment Month Argon-41 License Tritium (HTO) IOCFR20 Allowable Allowable (curies) (Ci) (R-1 13) .(mCi) * (mCi)January 0.307 5.833 0.060 124 February 0.036 5.833 0.049 124 March 0.047 5.833 0.060 124 April 0.095 5.833 0.0 124 May 0.130 5.833 0.075 124 June 0.181 5.833 0.0 124 ,July 0.155 5.833 0.098 124 August 0.091 5.833 0.0 124 September 0.165 5.833 0.0 124 October 0.351 5.833 0.074 124 November 0.293 5.833 0.0 124 December 0.195 5.833 0.079 124 Total 2.046 70.00 0.495 1488% of Allowable 2.96% -0.03%* Note: The tritium concentrations are estimates based on the amount of water lost by evaporation from the reactor multiplied by the concentration of tritium as HTO. Tritium sample analyses were performed by Severn Trent Laboratories.

B. No solid waste shipments, were made this calendar year.VIII. Radiation Monitoring Our program to monitor and control radiation exposures included the four major elements below during the operating year.1. Fifteen gamma-sensitive area monitors are located throughout the Nuclear Science Building.

A remote readout'panel is locatedJin'the reaictor health physics office. High alarm set points range from 2 mR/hr to 50 mR/hr. High level alarms are very infrequent and due to sample movements.

3

2. One Continuous Air Monitor (CAM) samples the air in the reactor bay. An equilibrium concentration of about 1 x 10- gCi/ml present for two minutes will result-in an increase of 400 cpm above background.

There are two alarm setpoints.

A low-level alarm is set at 3000 cpm and the high level alarm is set at 10000 cpm.Reactor bay air is sampled during all reactor operations.

The fixed particulate air filter is changed each week- and counted on a HPGE gamma spectrometer counting system. The charcoal filter, fitted behind the air filter, is also changed and counted weekly. In all instances, sample data were less than airborne concentration values in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 2 for all particulate radioisotopes produced by the reactor.3. Contamination wipe surveys and radiation surveys with portable survey instruments are performed at least once a month. All portable instruments are calibrated with a 3-Curie (initial activity)

Cs-1 37 source traceable to NBS, and wipes are counted on a Gamma Products G5000 low level counting system. Three areas were identified greater than 30 pCi/1 00 c2 beta contamination.

One 71.3 pCi/1 00 cm 2 was near the large cave in the reactor bay, 55.2 pCiil 00 cm 2 was near the walk thru on the east side of the reactor console, and 45.9 pCi/1 00 cm 2 was near the middle of building 10. One area that was identified greater then 15 pCi/1 00 cm 2 alpha was near the walk thru on the east side of the reactor console. All other areas were less than 30 pCi/1 00 cm 2 beta and 15 pCi/1 00 cm 2 alpha.The roof area over the reactor tank is roped off and posted as a radiation area (averaging 2.5 mRPhr) during 1 MW operations.

4. LiF TLD dosimeters were used at four outdoor environmental stations.Reactor facility visitors are issued self-reading dosimeters.

Reactor staff personnel are issued beta, gamma, albedo neutron badges.Table 2. Personnel Monitoring Results (1211105 -11130106)Deep Dose Shallow Dose Equivalent Equivalent Name Whole Body (Rem) Whole Body (Rem) Extremity (Rem)DeBey, T 0.237 0.261 0.430 Lightner, G 0.117 0.165 0.211 Liles, D 0.122 0.134 0.295 Lietz, P 0.073 0.074 0.231 Perryman, R 0.040 0.054 0.128 Note: December's personnel dosimetry results are not available at this time.Reactor visitors and occasional experimenters wore pocket dosimeters that resulted in no individual reading that was greater than one (1) mrem.4 Tabl'e 3. Environmental Dose Results Location Dose Dose Dose Dose Total Jan-Mar Apr-June July-Sept.

Oct.- Dec.(RAD) (PAD) (RAD) (PAD) (IRAD)Exhaust 0.014 0.017 0.017 0.030 0.078 Stack Cooling 0.004 0.005 0.000 0.001 0.010 Tower Fence West Vehicle 0.017 0.007 0.007 0.016 0.047 Gate West Room 0.019 0.016 0.030 0.061 0.126 151 Gate Southwest 0.006 0.005 0.000 0.003 0.014 Light Pole Control 0.039 0.031 0.039 0.038 0.147 (background)

Southeast 0.005 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.006 Light Pole I I _ I II Note: Above totals have the background subtracted (see control).

Environmental TLDs were supplied and analyzed by Global Dosimetry Solutions.

X. Environmental Monitoring There have been no uncontrolled radioactivity releases from the reactor to the present date. Thus, the data on file from past years to the present are considered to be background information.

Environmental soil and water samples were taken and analyzed.

No elevated readings or reactor-produced isotopes were identified (fallout Cs-137 was identified).

5