ML18101B188

Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1995 for Salem Unit 2. W/951214 Ltr

ML18101B188
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	11/30/1995
From:	Heller R, Phillips R, Warren C Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9601230191
Download: ML18101B188 (9)

Text

e PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit December 14, 1995 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attn.: Document Control Desk MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEMNO. 2 DOCKET NO: 50-311 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating report for the month of November is being sent to you.

Sincerely yours,

(!i, ~

C. Jt.rren General Manager -

Salem Operations RH:vls Enclosures C Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator USNRC, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 8-1-7.R4 230044

-- - - -- ---- -------

\

-~~9601230191 951130 PDR ADOCK 05000311 R PDR The power is in your hands.

95-2168 REV. 6/94

~ERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER L~

Docket No.: 50-311 Unit Name: Salem #2 Date: 12/10/95 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: 339-2735 Month November 1995 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl

OPERATING DATA REPORT ~

Docket No: 50-311 Date: 12/10/95 Completed by: Robert Phillips Telephone: 339-2735 Operating Status

1. Unit Name Salem No. 2 Notes

2. Reporting Period November 1995

3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411

4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170

5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115

6. Maximum Dependable Capacity(Gross MWe) 1149

7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106

8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason NA

9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) N/A

10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any NA This Month Year to Date Cumulative

11. Hours in Reporting Period 720 8016 123889

12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 0 2468.4 78083.6

13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 0 0 0

14. Hours Generator On-Line 0 2261.6 75229.5

15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0 0 0

16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 0 6807220.8 187781005 Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 0 2198890 78648898

18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) -4011 2021148 74744692

19. Unit Service Factor 0 28.2 60.7

20. Unit Availability Factor 0 28.2 60.7

21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 0 22.8 54.5

22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 0 22.6 54.1

23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 100 65.4 24.6

24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each)

We are presently in a scheduled refueling outage.

25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup:

Under review.

8-1-7.R2

UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH November 1995 DOCKET NO.: 50-311 UNIT NAME: Salem #2 DATE: 12-10-95 COMPLETED BY: Robert Phillips TELEPHONE: 609-339-2735 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DURATION DOWN EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 1 2 NO. DATE TYPE (HOURS) REASON REACTOR REPORT # CODE 4 CODE 5 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 2692 11-01-95 F 48 A 4 -------- SH CKT BRK Breaker Failure 1-9 500KV 3780 11-03-95 s 672 c 4 --------- zz zzzzzzzz Refueling Outage 1 2 3 4 5 F: Forced Reason Method: Exhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1

• Same S: Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1*Manual for Preparation of Data Source B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refuel ing 3-Automatic Scram Event Report CLER) File D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of CNUREG-0161)

E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain)

10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-311 MONTH: NOVEMBER 1995 UNIT NAME: SALEM2 DATE: 12/10/95 COMPLETED BY: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 The following items were evaluated in-accordance with the-provisions ofthe*Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.

1. Design Change Packages (DCP)

The reporting ofDCP related IOCFR50.59 evaluations is being modified to address these items only after they have been implemented and turned over to Operations. For the next several months, during this transition phase, we anticipate few new DCPs to report.

2. Procedures S2.0P-AR.ZZ-001 l(Q) "Control Console 2CC1; Fuel Handling Building S2.0P-SO.FHV-0001(Q) Ventilation Operation" (Revs. 12 & 4 respectively) This activity will allow the FHB supply fan to continue operating and thus the system to remain operable while administrative action is taken to monitor building temperatures~ The FHB Ventilation heating coil will be isolated and drained to preclude any equipment damage. UFSAR Section 9.4.3 states that the FHB is maintained between 60°F and l05°F.

The 40°F space temperature was justified in a previous safety evaluation, S-C-M900-MSE-0371-RO, based on equipment installed in the building. It states that, "provided the ambient temperatures do not fall below 35°F (Technical Specification minimum RWST temperature), no problems will be associated within the mechanical piping systems. No problems are associated with electrical cabling or junction boxes from low ambient temperatures." Specific components are also addressed in that evaluation. The previous evaluation concluded that the FHB supply fan should be shutdown when the bezel alarm came i~ and the heating water system examined for proper operation. This revision will allow continued operation until actual indoor ambient temperatures decrease to 40°F. Based on the system design, it is expected that the actual system*

IOCFR50.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-311 MONTH: NOVEMBER 1995 UNIT NAME: SALEM2 DATE: 12/10/95 COMPLETED BY: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 shutdown would not be required until outside ambient temperature is approximately 32°F, considering that the internal heat gain in the building and fan heat will result in approximately an eight degree differential. Therefore, provided the indoor temperatures remain at or above 40°F, no safety implications will result from space ambient temperatures lower than the UFSAR design limit for the FHB. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification.

(SORC 95-134)

3. Temporary Modifications (TMOD)

TMOD95-065 "Fuel Handling Building Temporary Heat" Rev. 0 - The UFSAR (Section 9.4.3) describes the Fuel Handling (FH) area ventilation system. This description includes the details of the supply air subsystem, including the heating coil. The temperature of the FHB is maintained by use of a temperature control valve that regulates the flow of heating water through the FH supply heating coil to maintain the FHB at a minimum of approximately 60°F. The heating water system is not a redundant system. With the heating water system out of service and the FHB temperature below the low temperature alarm setpoint, the alarm response procedure directs shutdown of the FH supply fan. The shutdown of the supply fan will also cause one of the FH exhaust fans to be stopped and the TSAS will be entered.

This TMOD will add the use of electric resistance heating coils and fans as a back up to the heating water and associated controls. This will allow the FH supply fan to remain in service when heating water is unavailable precluding entry into the TSAS. The power for the electric heaters and fans will be provided by a portable. temporary diesel driven electric generator. This TMOD has no impact on the FH exhaust subsystem. Installation of the TMOD allows for continued operation of the supply fan thus allowing two exhaust fans to remain in service. There

10CFR50.59 EVALUATIONS DOCKET NO: 50-311 MONTH: NOVEMBER 1995 UNIT NAME: SALEM2 DATE: 12/10/95 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 (Cont'd) .

11::::::1[:::i1:::::r1mm1:::::::]:i:::i:::::::::=::::::::::::::::::::::rj:::=:::::::::::1:::::1:::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1:::::::::s.-1::::::::::::::::::::]:::::::::]::::::::::::::::f]t::::::::::::::]::=:::::::::::::::::::f::::::=:ll is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-135)

TMOD95-066 "Install Fuel Handling Building Outside Air Probe" Rev. 0 -

The SAR, (Section 9.4.3) describes the Fuel Handling area ventilation system. This includes a description of the differential pressure controller and the additional alarms.

SAR Figures 9.4-3A and 9.4-3B show the differential pressure controller and the alarm switch with separate sensing lines. These separate lines are terminated in a covered pipe. This TMOD will connect the sensing lines into a common volume chamber. The chamber will be connected to an air probe by redundant sensing lines. The new sensing lines will be connected to the existing sensing lines just before the covered pipe. This modification will make the atmospheric reference portion of the system significantly .less sensitive to wind conditions which create localized pressure effects that are not representative of true ambient barometric pressure. Sensitivity to changes in actual barometric conditions will be unaffected. The changes being applied to accomplish this improvement are based on industry proven strategies whose bases are rooted in meteorological and fluid flow principles. This modification stabilizes the alarm and FHB ventilation control system, further ensuring released radioactive material will be filtered through the HEP A filters and charcoal adsorber prior to discharge to the atmosphere.

There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 95-135)

REFUELING INFORMATION DOCKET NO: 50-311 MONTH: NOVEMBER 1995 UNIT NAME: SALEM2 DATE: 12/10/95 COMPLETED BY: R.HELLER TELEPHONE: 609-339-5162 MONTH: NOVEMBER 1995

1. Refueling information has changed from last month: YES . X . NO ......_ __,_

2. Scheduled date for next refueling: 11/02/95 Scheduled date for restart following refueling: 3rd quarter 1996

3. a. Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?

YES. .NO. X .

NOT DETERMINED TO DATE . X .

b. Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?

YES. .NO. X .

If no, when is it scheduled? (to be determined)

5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: . n/a

6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:

7. Number ofFuel Assemblies:

a. Incore 193

b. In Spent Fuel Storage 556

8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: 1632 Future spent fuel storage capacity: 1632

9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: . March 2012 8-1-7.R4

SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING SUM1vlARY - UNIT 2 NOVEMBER 1995 SALEM UNIT No.* 2 The Unit remained shutdown for the entire period. According to commitments from PSE&G and a subsequent confirmatory action letter from the NRC, both Units will remain shutdown pending completion of the following actions:

• Appropriately address long standing equipment reliability and operability issues

• After the work is completed, conduct a restart readiness review to determine for ourselves the ability of each Unit to operate .in a safe, event free manner

• After the restart review, meet with the NRC and communicate the results of that revtew