ML14037A106: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REED COLLEGE*.*L ..<. *.. ... .. ..... ..,. .January 30, 2014:...-....:
.........
REACTOR FACILITY 7..- ...- ".,3203 Southeast a :Woodstock Boulevard U.S..Nuclear Regulatory Commission
.. .ATTN: Document Control DeskPortland, Oregon Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 97202-8199 telepone RE: Reply to Notice ofV.iolation 503/777-7222 Docket No. 50-288License No. R- 112fax503/777-7274 emailreactor@reed.edu webhttp://reactor.reed.edu The. Notice sof Violation dated Jan 14, 2014 states that the following Technical Specifications (TS) were violated:
*. TS 6.1.3, Staffing, which requires, in part, that the minimum staffing when thereactor is operating shall be a licensed reactor operator in the control room.* TS 1, .Definitions, which defines the reactor as operating whenever it is not shutdown or secured.1. The :licensee self-reported.
this yiolation on Nov. 18, 2013 to the NRC Operations Center with a follow-up letter to the Document Control Desk dated Nov. 25, 2013. Aroot cause investigation was initiated as required by internal procedures.
Thisinvestigation!
indicated that distraction at the end of a reactor power run resulted in thekey being left in the console unattended.
The control room was locked and no reactivity manipulations took place while the key was unattended.
: 2. The corrective action taken to date is retraining.
: 3. Over the years, Reed College has introduced actions designed to prevent this andsimilar events from occurring.
These actions include:
name tags, swinging doors,signage and lights interlocked with the key switch. Over time, these stimuli loose theireffectiveness.
Although several engineered solutions have been discussed none of thesesolutions are fail-safe and still fall into the realm of audio and visual stimulus.
However,a new key control system will also serve as a visual reminder to secure the console key.4. By August 29, 2014, a new key control system will be installed.
Additionally, we willcontinue to evaluate Radio-frequency identification (RFID) and proximity systems forapplicability and compatibility.
Respectfully, Melinda Krahenbuhl, Ph.D.Director, Reed Research ReactorpJ4&}}

Revision as of 20:41, 2 July 2018

Reed College, Reply to Notice of Violation
ML14037A106
Person / Time
Site: Reed College
Issue date: 01/30/2014
From: Krahenbuhl M P
Reed College
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML14037A106 (1)
v • d • e


Text

REED COLLEGE*.*L ..<. *.. ... .. ..... ..,. .January 30, 2014:...-....:

.........

REACTOR FACILITY 7..- ...- ".,3203 Southeast a :Woodstock Boulevard U.S..Nuclear Regulatory Commission

.. .ATTN: Document Control DeskPortland, Oregon Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 97202-8199 telepone RE: Reply to Notice ofV.iolation 503/777-7222 Docket No. 50-288License No. R- 112fax503/777-7274 emailreactor@reed.edu webhttp://reactor.reed.edu The. Notice sof Violation dated Jan 14, 2014 states that the following Technical Specifications (TS) were violated:

  • . TS 6.1.3, Staffing, which requires, in part, that the minimum staffing when thereactor is operating shall be a licensed reactor operator in the control room.* TS 1, .Definitions, which defines the reactor as operating whenever it is not shutdown or secured.1. The :licensee self-reported.

this yiolation on Nov. 18, 2013 to the NRC Operations Center with a follow-up letter to the Document Control Desk dated Nov. 25, 2013. Aroot cause investigation was initiated as required by internal procedures.

Thisinvestigation!

indicated that distraction at the end of a reactor power run resulted in thekey being left in the console unattended.

The control room was locked and no reactivity manipulations took place while the key was unattended.

2. The corrective action taken to date is retraining.
3. Over the years, Reed College has introduced actions designed to prevent this andsimilar events from occurring.

These actions include:

name tags, swinging doors,signage and lights interlocked with the key switch. Over time, these stimuli loose theireffectiveness.

Although several engineered solutions have been discussed none of thesesolutions are fail-safe and still fall into the realm of audio and visual stimulus.

However,a new key control system will also serve as a visual reminder to secure the console key.4. By August 29, 2014, a new key control system will be installed.

Additionally, we willcontinue to evaluate Radio-frequency identification (RFID) and proximity systems forapplicability and compatibility.

Respectfully, Melinda Krahenbuhl, Ph.D.Director, Reed Research ReactorpJ4&

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14037A106&oldid=795872"