ML17331A517: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORYORtlATIONDISTRIBUTIONSY8(BIDS)ACCESSIONNBR:8012180315DOC~DATE:80/12/10NOTARIZED:NODOCKETFACIL:50-315DonaldC,CookNuclearPowerPlantrUnitirIndiana80500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlantrUnit2rIndianaL05000316AUTH,NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONHUNTERrR~STIndianaltMichiganElectricCo~RECIP~NAMERECIPIENTAFFILIATIONDENTONrH+R~OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulationrDirector
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY ORtlATION DISTRIBUTION SY8(BIDS)ACCESSION NBR:8012180315 DOC~DATE:80/12/10NOTARIZED:
NODOCKETFACIL:50-315 DonaldC,CookNuclearPowerPlantrUnitirIndiana80500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlantrUnit2rIndianaL05000316AUTH,NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION HUNTERrR~STIndianaltMichiganElectricCo~RECIP~NAMERECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONrH+R
~OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulationr Director


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ForwardsproposedplantsysTechSpecs8licenseconditionsincorporatingCategoryAlessonslearnedrequirementsrinresponsetoNRC800702ltdDISTRIBUTIONCODEeA001SCOPIESRECEIVED:LTRENCLSIZE:jTITLE:GeneralDistributionforafterIssuanceofOperatingLicenseNOTES;ILE:3copiesallmaterial.Send3copiesofallmaterialtoIE,ED0500031505000316RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEACTIONVARGArSe04INTERNAL:D/DIRrHUMFAC0818,E06OF11GFILE01COPIESLTTRENCL131311RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEDIRrDIVOFLICNRCPDR02ORASSESSBR10COPIESLTTRENCL111110EXTERNAl:ACRSNSIC0905ib1611LPDR03110<<aa)go~TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTRqOENCL krwa0l'lHkQj~~r INDIANALMICHIGANELECTRICCOMPANYP.O.BOX18BOWLINGGREENSTATIONNEWYORK,N.Y.10004December10,1980AEP:NRC:00449DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74LessonsLearnedTechnicalSpecificationsCD*~C->a~cafOC<fIllRCDMr.HaroldR.Denton,DirectorOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulationU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionWashington,D.C.20555
ForwardsproposedplantsysTechSpecs8licenseconditions incorporating CategoryAlessonslearnedrequirementsrin responsetoNRC800702ltdDISTRIBUTION CODEeA001SCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:jTITLE:GeneralDistribution forafterIssuanceofOperating LicenseNOTES;ILE:3copiesallmaterial.
Send3copiesofallmaterialtoIE,ED0500031505000316RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME ACTIONVARGArSe04INTERNAL:
D/DIRrHUM FAC0818,E06OF11GFILE01COPIESLTTRENCL131311RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME DIRrDIVOFLICNRCPDR02ORASSESSBR10COPIESLTTRENCL111110EXTERNAl:
ACRSNSIC0905ib1611LPDR03110<<aa)go~TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTRqOENCL krwa0l'lHkQj~~r INDIANALMICHIGANELECTRICCOMPANYP.O.BOX18BOWLINGGREENSTATIONNEWYORK,N.Y.10004December10,1980AEP:NRC:00449 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74LessonsLearnedTechnical Specifications CD*~C->a~cafOC<fIllRCDMr.HaroldR.Denton,DirectorOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555


==DearMr.Denton:==
==DearMr.Denton:==
Thisisinresponse'oMr.D.Eisenhut'sletterdatedJuly2,1980proposingTechnicalSpecificationsandcertainlicenseconditionsfortheCategory"A"LessonsLearned(NUREG-0578)requirementsimplementedattheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.TheCookPlanthasbeenoperatingwithStandardTechnicalSpecifi-cations(STS).Assuch,manyofthechangessuggestedinthemodelSTSfortheLessonsLearneditemscontainedinMr.Eisenhut'sletterarealreadyincludedintheCookPlantTechnicalSpecifications.OurproposedTechnicalSpecifications(Attachment2and3)arebasedonrevisi'onstotheexistingCookPlantTechnicalSpecificationsforUnits1and2andwhereapplicable,updatedtoincludethescopeoftheCategory"A"itemsascontainedintheSafetyEvaluationReport(SER)forCookPlantcompliancewiththeCategory"A."requirements,issuedonMarch20,1980.Norevisionsarebei'ngproposedtoaddresswordingdifferencesorformatdeviationsfromthosecontainedinthemodelSTSfortheLessonsLearneditems.Attachment1containsabriefdiscussionofeachoftheTechnicalSpecificationrevisionsproposedinAttachment2and3.Attachment4containstheproposedlicenseconditions'forUnits1and2oftheCookPlant.EnallinstancesthecontentofthemodelSTSofMr.Eisenhut'sletterwasusedasguidanceinthepreparationoftheCookPlantspecificTechnicalSpecifi'cations.oo/5  
Thisisinresponse'o Mr.D.Eisenhut's letterdatedJuly2,1980proposing Technical Specifications andcertainlicenseconditions fortheCategory"A"LessonsLearned(NUREG-0578) requirements implemented attheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.TheCookPlanthasbeenoperating withStandardTechnical Specifi-cations(STS).Assuch,manyofthechangessuggested inthemodelSTSfortheLessonsLearneditemscontained inMr.Eisenhut's letterarealreadyincludedintheCookPlantTechnical Specifications.
'I~s<tNllarf'IC,gI~,~C*'~I Nr.HaroldR.DentonDirectorAEP:NRC:00449TheproposedTechnicalSpecificationrevisionsandlicenseconditionscontainedintheAttachmentstothisletterhavebeenreviewedbythePNSRCandtheNSDRCasrequiredbyourTechnicalSpecifications.ThesereviewsconcludedthattheproposedTechnicalSpecificationrevisionsandlicenseconditionsdonotconstituteanunreviewedsafetyquestionandwillnotad-verselyaffectthehealthandsafetyofthepublic.I8MElectricCo.interprets10CFR170asrequiringthatnofeeaccompanythissubmittal.4Verytrulyyours,R.S.unterVicePresidentcc:R.C.CallenG.CharnoffR.S.HunterR.W.JurgensenD.V.Shaller-BridgmanNRCRegionIIIResidentInspectoratCookPlant-Bridgman  
OurproposedTechnical Specifications (Attachment 2and3)arebasedonrevisi'ons totheexistingCookPlantTechnical Specifications forUnits1and2andwhereapplicable, updatedtoincludethescopeoftheCategory"A"itemsascontained intheSafetyEvaluation Report(SER)forCookPlantcompliance withtheCategory"A."requirements, issuedonMarch20,1980.Norevisions arebei'ngproposedtoaddresswordingdifferences orformatdeviations fromthosecontained inthemodelSTSfortheLessonsLearneditems.Attachment 1containsabriefdiscussion ofeachoftheTechnical Specification revisions proposedinAttachment 2and3.Attachment 4containstheproposedlicenseconditions
'l ATTACHMENT1TOAEP:NRC:00449ThisattachmentbrieflydescribestheTechnicalSpecificationrevisionscontainedinattachments2and3toAEP:NRC:00449.TherevisionstoexistingCookPlantTechnicalSpecificationsaredenotedbybarsintherighthandmargin.TheappropriaterevisionstotheBasesarealsoin-cludedintheseattacj'ments.MeareorderingtheseTechnicalSpecifications~changesinamannerconsistentwiththenumberingofourTechnicalSpecifi-cations.AuxiliaryFeedwaterSstemSecifications'ThefollowingexistingTechnicalSpecificationshavebeenrevisedtoincorporatetheautomaticinitiationrequirementsintotheEngineeredSafetyFeatureActuationSystemspecificationsassetforthinthemodelTechnicalSpecificationsofMr.Eisenhut'sletter.a}~Secification3/4.7.1.2-Units1and2(Page-3/47-6ofbothUnits)MehaveremovedtheautomaticstartingsignalslistedunderSurveillanceRequirement4.7.1.2.bre-placingthemwiththeappropriateESFactuationtestreferencetobeperformedunderSpecification3/4.3.2.ThisisinaccordancewiththemodelTechnicalSpecifi-cationsofl1r.Eisenhut'sletter.b)Secification3/4.3.2-Units1and2Tables3.3-3,3.3-4,3.3-5and4.3'-2ofbothUnits.1and2havebeenrevisedtoincorporateintothemtheautomaticinitiationrequirementsforauxiliaryfeedwater.Basically,therequirementsformerlyinSpecification-4.7.1.2.bhavebeenincorporatedintotheirappropriatesectionofSpecification3/4.3.2.Thisincludesa)theLCOfortheinstrumentation,b)thesetpoints/allowablevalues,whereapplicable,c)thesystemresponsetimes'andd)theappropriatesurveillancerequirements.OurexistingTechnicalSpecifications3/4.3.2(units1and2)in-cludingtherecentamendmentsfor."GridDegradedVoltage"havealreadypuimanyoftheAFHrequirementscontainedinthemodelTechnicalSpecificationsofMr.Eisenhut'sletterintotheCookPlantTechnicalSpecifications.Assuchveryfewrevisionstothesetablesarenecessaryandareindicatedoytherevisionbars'intherighthandmarginoftheaffectedpages.
'forUnits1and2oftheCookPlant.Enallinstances thecontentofthemodelSTSofMr.Eisenhut's letterwasusedasguidanceinthepreparation oftheCookPlantspecificTechnical Specifi'cations.
0 Additionally,inUnit1only(Attachment2),wehaveincludedundertheSafetyInjectionfunctioninSpecification3/4.3.2theautostartrequirementfortheHotorDrivenAuxiliaryFeedwaterPumps(NDAFP)byre-visingtheheadingof"FunctionalUnit"Sectionl.ontables3.3-3(page3/43-16),3.3-4(page3/43-24)and4.3-2(page3/43-31)toincludethel<DAFP's.ThisrequirementisalreadyincorporatedinthecorrespondingexistingUnit2TechnicalSpecificationsandtheyneednotberevisedtomeettheLessonsLearnedrequirements.Secification3/4.3.3.8ND!-Unit1Secification3/4.3.3.6-Unit2TheexistingTechnicalSpecificationforPost-AccidentInstru-mentationinUnit2hasbeenrevisedtoincludetheapplicablemonitoringinstrumentationfortheCategory"A"LessonsLearneditemsonTables3.3-10and4.3-10anddeletionoftheSteamGeneratorwiderangelevelindicationfromthesametablesasapost-accidentmonitoringinstrument.TheUnit1TechnicalSpecificationscurrentlydonotcontainaspecificationforpost-accidentinstrumentation.Assuch,therevisedUnit2Specification3/4.3.3.6isbeingproposedinitsentiretyinUnit1asanewSpecification3/4.3.3.8.Heareaddingthisattheendof.theInstrumentationsectionoftheUnit1TechnicalSpecificationsasanewitem'oavoidextensivepagerenumbering.TheapprovedCookPlantpost-accidentmoritoringinstrumentationfortheCategory"A"LessonsLearneditemsinclude.(Reference1):a)Auxiliaryfeedwaterflowratechannels.ThesechannelscanbesubstitutedforbyusingthecorrespondingsteamgeneratorwaterlevelchannelintheeventthattheAFHflowratechannelsbecomeinoperable.BothsystemssatisfytheLessonsLearnedrequirements(Reference1).InthiscasetheLCOismetandnofurther-actionisre-quired.rb)RCSsubcoolingmarginmonitor.Thiscanbe.substitutedforbyusingthePlantcomputer(PRODAC-250)readoutofsubcoolingmarginintheeventthatthesubcoolingmonitorbecomesinoperable.BothsystemssatisfytheLessonsLearnedrequirements(Reference1).InthiscasetheLCOismetandnofurtheractionisrequired.c)PORVpositionindication.Thestem-mountedlimitswitchesprovidedirectvalvepositionindicationincompliancewiththeLessonLearnedrequirements.Theacousticmonitoringsystemindicationwhichisalsoinstalled,canbesubstitutedforthelimitswitchin-dication.BothsystemssatisfytheLessonsLearnedrequirements(Reference1).InthiscasetheLCOismetandnofurtheractionisrequired.
oo/5  
3&40d)'ORVblockvalvepositionindication.Thestem-mountedlimitswit'chesprovidedirectvalvepositioniiydicationincompliancewiththeLessonsLearnedrequirements.Pe)':Safetyvalvepositionindication.TheacousticmonitoringsystemprovidesthedirectvalvepositionindicationincompliancewiththeLessonsLearnedrequirements.The"SteamGeneratorWaterLevel-WideRange"channelhasbeen.deletedfromtheUnit2tables,andhasnotbeenincludedinthecorre-spondingproposedUnit1tablesforthefollowingreasons.TheSteamGeneratorHideRangeHaterLevel(SGWRML)instrumentationdoesnotperformanysafety-relatedfunctionandisnotassumedoperableinthevariousplant.safetyanalyses.Assuch,theSGWRWLInstrumentationisnotincludedwithinthescopeofIEBulletinNo.'9-01B.TheSGNarrowRangeWaterLevelInstrumentation(3channels/loop)isseismicallyandenvironmentallyqualifiedandiscorrectlyincludedin.tableNos.3.3-10and4.3-10.Thenarrowrangeinstrumentationfulfillsallpost-accidentmonitoringrequire-mentsforSGlevelindication'ndisreferencedintheemergencyoperatingprocedures.Secification3/4.4.4-Units1and2TheexistingTechnicalSpecificationforthePressurizerhasbeen.revisedtoinclude,withintheLimitingConditionforOperation(LCO),therequirementforoperabilityofatleast150kWofheaters.Thisisthenecessarycapacitytohaveavailablewithinone(1)hourformaintainingadequatesubcoolingwhile'ntherraturalcirculationcoolingmode.TheexistingLCOcoversadequatelytherequirementforPressurizerlevelin-strumentationsincethisequipmentisusedtoverifythatthePressurizerisnon-watersolidbymaintainingacertainwatervolume.Thevalueusedisconsistentwiththatusedinourproposed.over-pressurizationprotectionTechnicalSpecification.ThecorrespondingACTIONoftheLCOandtheSurveillanceRequirementshavebeenrevisedtoincludetheneviadditionalrequirementscontainedinthemodelTechnicalSpecificationsofHr.Eisenhut'sJuly'2,1980letter.Secification3/4.4.11-NEW-Units1and2TheproposedTechnicalSpecificationfortheReactorCoolantSystemPowerOperatedReliefValves(PORVs)andBlockValves(BVs)isanewspecifi-cationfortheCookPlant.WehaveappropriatelyincludedthisspecificationwithinthesectionoftheTechnicalSpecificationscoveringtheReactorCoolantSystem(3/4.4)andtoavoidextensivere-numberingofexistingTechnicalSpec-ificationsweareaddingitattheendof'section3/4.4asanewSpecification3/4.4.11.
'I~s<tNllarf'IC,gI~,~C*'~I Nr.HaroldR.DentonDirectorAEP:NRC:00449 TheproposedTechnical Specification revisions andlicenseconditions contained intheAttachments tothisletterhavebeenreviewedbythePNSRCandtheNSDRCasrequiredbyourTechnical Specifications.
TheCookPlantdesigncontainsthree(3)PORYsandeachhasacorrespondingBV:ThePORVsarespring-closed,air-to-openuponactuationoftheircorrespondingsolenoidcontrolvalve.ThesolenoidvalveandtheBVareelectricallyoperated(theBVbeingamotoroperatedvalve)andpow'eredfromtheemergencybuses.Thegeneric)lestinghouseanalysesperformedforafourloopplantinclude'onlytwoPORY'sandassociatedBV's.TheproposedActionstate-mentallowsforoperationalmodechangesintheCookPlantwithone(1)ofthePORY'sorBV'sinoperable,providedofcoursethatthereliefpathis'solated.Also,thereportingrequirementsarenotapplicableinthecaseofone(1)PORYorBVinoperable.ThisadditionalflexibilityiswarrantedsincetheCookPlantdesigndiffersfromthegeneric4loopwestinghousePlantandsincetherequiremen'ttoisolatetheinoperablereliefpath(other-wiseshutdowntheplant)isnotwaived.AlloftheapprovedgenericanalysesremainvalidfortheCookPlantevenwithone'ORYorBV(reliefpath)in-operableandisolated.TherearetwowaystoisolateareliefpathdependingonwhetherthePORY'ortheBVisinoperable.InthecaseofaninoperablePORY'whichcannotberestoredtooperablestatustheassociatedBYmustbeclosedandpowerremoved.InthecaseofaninoperableBVwhichcannotberestoredtooperablestatusandtheBVcannotbeclosedor'owerremoved,theassociatedPORVcanbeclosedandpowerremovedfromitsassociatedSolenoidValve.'heseactionrequirementsholdforallthree(3)ofCook'sPORY's/BV'sother-wiseplantshutdownisrequired.TheseprovisionsareconsistentwiththemodelTechnicalSpecificationscontainedinMr.Eisenhut'sletter.Thepro-visiontoclosethePORVandremovepowerfromitsassociatedSolenoidValvewithaninoperableBYassuresthatthereliefpathonce.isolatedinthismannerwillremainisolated.OfcoursewhentestingtheBYandActionState-ments3.4.ll.aor3.4.1l.careapplied,theprovisionsof4.0.4arenolongerapplicablesincethepreferenceistokeepthereliefpathwithinoperableequipmentinanisolatedcondition.Theexemptionisincludedinthecorre-spondingsurveillancerequirements.AsmentionedabovethepowersuppliesfortheBV'sandthePORY'sarefromtheemergencybuses.ThisisapermanentfeatureintheCookPlantdesign.Assuch,thesurveillancerequirementfortestingof.theemergencypowersuppliescontainedinHr.Eisenhut'smodelTechnicalSpecificationdoesnotapplytoCookPlantsincetheseelectricalpowersourcesarepermanentlyconnectedtotheemergencysafeguardsbuses.Inordertomeettheintent'ofthemodelTechnicalSpecificationsurveillancerequirementwehaveincludedtheprovisiontotestthePORV's/BV'swhentheemergencysafeguardsbusesareenergizedbythedieselgeneratorsandplantbatteriesinconjunctionwiththecorresponding18monthssurveillancerequirementsfor'thisequipment.ThePORV'sandBV'sarejustanelectricalloadconnectedtotheemergencysafeguardsbusesand,thus,therequiredsurveillancewillbeperformedwhenthesebusesareenergizedfromtheiremergencypowersources.  
Thesereviewsconcluded thattheproposedTechnical Specification revisions andlicenseconditions donotconstitute anunreviewed safetyquestionandwillnotad-verselyaffectthehealthandsafetyofthepublic.I8MElectricCo.interprets 10CFR170asrequiring thatnofeeaccompany thissubmittal.
~~J InadditioninUnit1wehaverevisedSpecification4.0.3onpage3/40-2tobeconsistentwith4.0.3ofUnit2andnotrequiresurveillanceoninoperableequipment.Forexample,thisbecomesneces-sarywhenareliefpathisisolatedbecauseofinoperableequipment,vihoseoperationtoperformrequiredsurveillancecouldcausealossofRCSpressureboundary.PerformanceoftheBYcyclingtestsuggestedinthemodelTechnicalSpecificationswhenthePORVinthesamereliefpathis.inoperableandtheBVhastobeclosedandmadeinoperable{powerremoved).inaccordancewiththecorrespondingActionrequirementswouldbeundesirablesinceitwouldrequirere-openingthatBV.Assuch,addingthisprovision.to4.0.3inUnit1becomesnecessarvandagreeswit}i4.0.3inUnit2;----Table3.6-1:Containment'solationValves-Units1and2Asecond'fail-closed'iroperated.containmentisolationvalve,gCR-301,-isbeinginstalledintheletdown;linetotheletdownheatex-changertoaddresstheNRCconcernsetforthinItem2.1.4oftheCommissionsafetyevaluationofIMECo.compliancewiththeCategory'A'essonLearnedRequirementsdatedMarch20,1980.TechnicalSpecificationTable3.6-1ofbothUnits1and2isbeingrevisedtoincorporate'thisvalve.Therevisiontothisexistingspecificationshouldbecomeeffectiveuponinstallationofthenewcontainmentisolationvalve.Anexactinstallati'ondatehasnotbeendeterminedsincethisneviequipment.hasalongprocurementleadtime(18mos.).Inanycase,arefuelingoutageisrequiredtoperformthismodification.TherestoftheNRC-proposedTechnicalSpecificationisalreadyapartoftheCookPlantTechnicalSpecifications.Table6.2-1-.Units'1and2bTherequirementtohaveaShiftTechnicalAdvisor(STA)ondutyinModes1,2,354hasbeenincludedinthistableonTechnicalSpecifi-cationpage6-4forbothUnits1and2.ASTAisondutyforbothUnits1and2asasharedfunction(appropriatelyfootnoted)incompliancewiththeLessonsLearnedrequirements.Secification6.3-Units'1and2ThefacilitystaffqualificationrequirementshavebeenrevisedtoincorporatethoserequirementsapplicabletotheSTA.UndertheapprovedCookPlantSTAprogram,fullcompliancewiththesestaffqualifi-'ationrequirementswillbeachievedbyJanuary1,1981.MeproposethisTechnicalSpecificationrevisionnow{applicabletobothUnits182)totakeeffecton1/1/81incompliancewiththeLessonsLearnedrequirements.Reference1:NRCSafetyEvaluation"Reportforcompliancewiththecategory"A"LessonsLearnedrequirementsdatedMarch20,1980.}}
4Verytrulyyours,R.S.unterVicePresident cc:R.C.CallenG.CharnoffR.S.HunterR.W.Jurgensen D.V.Shaller-BridgmanNRCRegionIIIResidentInspector atCookPlant-Bridgman  
'l ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:00449 Thisattachment brieflydescribes theTechnical Specification revisions contained inattachments 2and3toAEP:NRC:00449.
Therevisions toexistingCookPlantTechnical Specifications aredenotedbybarsintherighthandmargin.Theappropriate revisions totheBasesarealsoin-cludedintheseattacj'ments.
MeareorderingtheseTechnical Specifications
~changesinamannerconsistent withthenumbering ofourTechnical Specifi-cations.Auxiliary Feedwater SstemSecifications
'Thefollowing existingTechnical Specifications havebeenrevisedtoincorporate theautomatic initiation requirements intotheEngineered SafetyFeatureActuation Systemspecifications assetforthinthemodelTechnical Specifications ofMr.Eisenhut's letter.a}~Secification 3/4.7.1.2
-Units1and2(Page-3/4 7-6ofbothUnits)Mehaveremovedtheautomatic startingsignalslistedunderSurveillance Requirement 4.7.1.2.b re-placingthemwiththeappropriate ESFactuation testreference tobeperformed underSpecification 3/4.3.2.Thisisinaccordance withthemodelTechnical Specifi-cationsofl1r.Eisenhut's letter.b)Secification 3/4.3.2-Units1and2Tables3.3-3,3.3-4,3.3-5and4.3'-2ofbothUnits.1and2havebeenrevisedtoincorporate intothemtheautomatic initiation requirements forauxiliary feedwater.
Basically, therequirements formerlyinSpecification
-4.7.1.2.b havebeenincorporated intotheirappropriate sectionofSpecification 3/4.3.2.Thisincludesa)theLCOfortheinstrumentation, b)thesetpoints/allowable values,whereapplicable, c)thesystemresponsetimes'andd)theappropriate surveillance requirements.
OurexistingTechnical Specifications 3/4.3.2(units1and2)in-cludingtherecentamendments for."GridDegradedVoltage"havealreadypuimanyoftheAFHrequirements contained inthemodelTechnical Specifications ofMr.Eisenhut's letterintotheCookPlantTechnical Specifications.
Assuchveryfewrevisions tothesetablesarenecessary andareindicated oytherevisionbars'intherighthandmarginoftheaffectedpages.
0 Additionally, inUnit1only(Attachment 2),wehaveincludedundertheSafetyInjection functioninSpecification 3/4.3.2theautostartrequirement fortheHotorDrivenAuxiliary Feedwater Pumps(NDAFP)byre-visingtheheadingof"Functional Unit"Sectionl.ontables3.3-3(page3/43-16),3.3-4(page3/43-24)and4.3-2(page3/43-31)toincludethel<DAFP's.
Thisrequirement isalreadyincorporated inthecorresponding existingUnit2Technical Specifications andtheyneednotberevisedtomeettheLessonsLearnedrequirements.
Secification 3/4.3.3.8 ND!-Unit1Secification 3/4.3.3.6
-Unit2TheexistingTechnical Specification forPost-Accident Instru-mentation inUnit2hasbeenrevisedtoincludetheapplicable monitoring instrumentation fortheCategory"A"LessonsLearneditemsonTables3.3-10and4.3-10anddeletionoftheSteamGenerator widerangelevelindication fromthesametablesasapost-accident monitoring instrument.
TheUnit1Technical Specifications currently donotcontainaspecification forpost-accidentinstrumentation.
Assuch,therevisedUnit2Specification 3/4.3.3.6 isbeingproposedinitsentiretyinUnit1asanewSpecification 3/4.3.3.8.
Heareaddingthisattheendof.theInstrumentation sectionoftheUnit1Technical Specifications asanewitem'oavoidextensive pagerenumbering.
TheapprovedCookPlantpost-accident moritoringinstrumentation fortheCategory"A"LessonsLearneditemsinclude.(Reference 1):a)Auxiliary feedwater flowratechannels.
Thesechannelscanbesubstituted forbyusingthecorresponding steamgenerator waterlevelchannelintheeventthattheAFHflowratechannelsbecomeinoperable.
BothsystemssatisfytheLessonsLearnedrequirements (Reference 1).InthiscasetheLCOismetandnofurther-actionisre-quired.rb)RCSsubcooling marginmonitor.Thiscanbe.substituted forbyusingthePlantcomputer(PRODAC-250) readoutofsubcooling marginintheeventthatthesubcooling monitorbecomesinoperable.
BothsystemssatisfytheLessonsLearnedrequirements (Reference 1).InthiscasetheLCOismetandnofurtheractionisrequired.
c)PORVpositionindication.
Thestem-mounted limitswitchesprovidedirectvalvepositionindication incompliance withtheLessonLearnedrequirements.
Theacousticmonitoring systemindication whichisalsoinstalled, canbesubstituted forthelimitswitchin-dication.
BothsystemssatisfytheLessonsLearnedrequirements (Reference 1).InthiscasetheLCOismetandnofurtheractionisrequired.
3&40d)'ORVblockvalvepositionindication.
Thestem-mounted limitswit'ches providedirectvalvepositioniiydication incompliance withtheLessonsLearnedrequirements.
Pe)':Safetyvalvepositionindication.
Theacousticmonitoring systemprovidesthedirectvalvepositionindication incompliance withtheLessonsLearnedrequirements.
The"SteamGenerator WaterLevel-WideRange"channelhasbeen.deletedfromtheUnit2tables,andhasnotbeenincludedinthecorre-spondingproposedUnit1tablesforthefollowing reasons.TheSteamGenerator HideRangeHaterLevel(SGWRML)instrumentation doesnotperformanysafety-related functionandisnotassumedoperableinthevariousplant.safetyanalyses.
Assuch,theSGWRWLInstrumentation isnotincludedwithinthescopeofIEBulletinNo.'9-01B.
TheSGNarrowRangeWaterLevelInstrumentation (3channels/loop) isseismically andenvironmentally qualified andiscorrectly includedin.tableNos.3.3-10and4.3-10.Thenarrowrangeinstrumentation fulfillsallpost-accident monitoring require-mentsforSGlevelindication'nd isreferenced intheemergency operating procedures.
Secification 3/4.4.4-Units1and2TheexistingTechnical Specification forthePressurizer hasbeen.revisedtoinclude,withintheLimitingCondition forOperation (LCO),therequirement foroperability ofatleast150kWofheaters.Thisisthenecessary capacitytohaveavailable withinone(1)hourformaintaining adequatesubcooling while'ntherraturalcirculation coolingmode.TheexistingLCOcoversadequately therequirement forPressurizer levelin-strumentation sincethisequipment isusedtoverifythatthePressurizer isnon-water solidbymaintaining acertainwatervolume.Thevalueusedisconsistent withthatusedinourproposed.over-pressurization protection Technical Specification.
Thecorresponding ACTIONoftheLCOandtheSurveillance Requirements havebeenrevisedtoincludetheneviadditional requirements contained inthemodelTechnical Specifications ofHr.Eisenhut's July'2,1980letter.Secification 3/4.4.11-NEW-Units1and2TheproposedTechnical Specification fortheReactorCoolantSystemPowerOperatedReliefValves(PORVs)andBlockValves(BVs)isanewspecifi-cationfortheCookPlant.Wehaveappropriately includedthisspecification withinthesectionoftheTechnical Specifications coveringtheReactorCoolantSystem(3/4.4)andtoavoidextensive re-numbering ofexistingTechnical Spec-ifications weareaddingitattheendof'section 3/4.4asanewSpecification 3/4.4.11.
TheCookPlantdesigncontainsthree(3)PORYsandeachhasacorresponding BV:ThePORVsarespring-closed, air-to-open uponactuation oftheircorresponding solenoidcontrolvalve.ThesolenoidvalveandtheBVareelectrically operated(theBVbeingamotoroperatedvalve)andpow'eredfromtheemergency buses.Thegeneric)lestinghouse analysesperformed forafourloopplantinclude'onlytwoPORY'sandassociated BV's.TheproposedActionstate-mentallowsforoperational modechangesintheCookPlantwithone(1)ofthePORY'sorBV'sinoperable, providedofcoursethatthereliefpathis'solated.
Also,thereporting requirements arenotapplicable inthecaseofone(1)PORYorBVinoperable.
Thisadditional flexibility iswarranted sincetheCookPlantdesigndiffersfromthegeneric4loopwestinghouse Plantandsincetherequiremen't toisolatetheinoperable reliefpath(other-wiseshutdowntheplant)isnotwaived.AlloftheapprovedgenericanalysesremainvalidfortheCookPlantevenwithone'ORYorBV(reliefpath)in-operableandisolated.
Therearetwowaystoisolateareliefpathdepending onwhetherthePORY'ortheBVisinoperable.
Inthecaseofaninoperable PORY'which cannotberestoredtooperablestatustheassociated BYmustbeclosedandpowerremoved.Inthecaseofaninoperable BVwhichcannotberestoredtooperablestatusandtheBVcannotbeclosedor'owerremoved,theassociated PORVcanbeclosedandpowerremovedfromitsassociated SolenoidValve.'hese actionrequirements holdforallthree(3)ofCook'sPORY's/BV's other-wiseplantshutdownisrequired.
Theseprovisions areconsistent withthemodelTechnical Specifications contained inMr.Eisenhut's letter.Thepro-visiontoclosethePORVandremovepowerfromitsassociated SolenoidValvewithaninoperable BYassuresthatthereliefpathonce.isolatedinthismannerwillremainisolated.
OfcoursewhentestingtheBYandActionState-ments3.4.ll.aor3.4.1l.careapplied,theprovisions of4.0.4arenolongerapplicable sincethepreference istokeepthereliefpathwithinoperable equipment inanisolatedcondition.
Theexemption isincludedinthecorre-spondingsurveillance requirements.
Asmentioned abovethepowersuppliesfortheBV'sandthePORY'sarefromtheemergency buses.Thisisapermanent featureintheCookPlantdesign.Assuch,thesurveillance requirement fortestingof.theemergency powersuppliescontained inHr.Eisenhut's modelTechnical Specification doesnotapplytoCookPlantsincetheseelectrical powersourcesarepermanently connected totheemergency safeguards buses.Inordertomeettheintent'ofthemodelTechnical Specification surveillance requirement wehaveincludedtheprovision totestthePORV's/BV's whentheemergency safeguards busesareenergized bythedieselgenerators andplantbatteries inconjunction withthecorresponding 18monthssurveillance requirements for'thisequipment.
ThePORV'sandBV'sarejustanelectrical loadconnected totheemergency safeguards busesand,thus,therequiredsurveillance willbeperformed whenthesebusesareenergized fromtheiremergency powersources.  
~~J InadditioninUnit1wehaverevisedSpecification 4.0.3onpage3/40-2tobeconsistent with4.0.3ofUnit2andnotrequiresurveillance oninoperable equipment.
Forexample,thisbecomesneces-sarywhenareliefpathisisolatedbecauseofinoperable equipment, vihoseoperation toperformrequiredsurveillance couldcausealossofRCSpressureboundary.
Performance oftheBYcyclingtestsuggested inthemodelTechnical Specifications whenthePORVinthesamereliefpathis.inoperable andtheBVhastobeclosedandmadeinoperable
{powerremoved).inaccordance withthecorresponding Actionrequirements wouldbeundesirable sinceitwouldrequirere-opening thatBV.Assuch,addingthisprovision
.to4.0.3inUnit1becomesnecessarv andagreeswit}i4.0.3inUnit2;----Table3.6-1:Containment'solation Valves-Units 1and2Asecond'fail-closed'ir operated.containment isolation valve,gCR-301,-isbeinginstalled intheletdown;line totheletdownheatex-changertoaddresstheNRCconcernsetforthinItem2.1.4oftheCommission safetyevaluation ofIMECo.compliance withtheCategory'A'essonLearnedRequirements datedMarch20,1980.Technical Specification Table3.6-1ofbothUnits1and2isbeingrevisedtoincorporate
'thisvalve.Therevisiontothisexistingspecification shouldbecomeeffective uponinstallation ofthenewcontainment isolation valve.Anexactinstallati'on datehasnotbeendetermined sincethisneviequipment.
hasalongprocurement leadtime(18mos.).Inanycase,arefueling outageisrequiredtoperformthismodification.
TherestoftheNRC-proposedTechnical Specification isalreadyapartoftheCookPlantTechnical Specifications.
Table6.2-1-.Units'1and2bTherequirement tohaveaShiftTechnical Advisor(STA)ondutyinModes1,2,354hasbeenincludedinthistableonTechnical Specifi-cationpage6-4forbothUnits1and2.ASTAisondutyforbothUnits1and2asasharedfunction(appropriately footnoted) incompliance withtheLessonsLearnedrequirements.
Secification 6.3-Units'1and2Thefacilitystaffqualification requirements havebeenrevisedtoincorporate thoserequirements applicable totheSTA.UndertheapprovedCookPlantSTAprogram,fullcompliance withthesestaffqualifi-'ationrequirements willbeachievedbyJanuary1,1981.MeproposethisTechnical Specification revisionnow{applicable tobothUnits182)totakeeffecton1/1/81incompliance withtheLessonsLearnedrequirements.
Reference 1:NRCSafetyEvaluation "Reportforcompliance withthecategory"A"LessonsLearnedrequirements datedMarch20,1980.}}

Revision as of 08:25, 29 June 2018

Application to Amend Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,consisting of Proposed Tech Specs & License Conditions Incorporating Category a Lessons Learned Requirements,In Response to NRC 800702 Ltr
ML17331A517
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 12/10/1980
From: HUNTER R S
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: DENTON H R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17331A518 List:
References
AEP:NRC:00449, AEP:NRC:449, NUDOCS 8012180315
Download: ML17331A517 (13)
v • d • e


Text

REGULATORY ORtlATION DISTRIBUTION SY8(BIDS)ACCESSION NBR:8012180315 DOC~DATE:80/12/10NOTARIZED:

NODOCKETFACIL:50-315 DonaldC,CookNuclearPowerPlantrUnitirIndiana80500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlantrUnit2rIndianaL05000316AUTH,NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION HUNTERrR~STIndianaltMichiganElectricCo~RECIP~NAMERECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONrH+R

~OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulationr Director

SUBJECT:

ForwardsproposedplantsysTechSpecs8licenseconditions incorporating CategoryAlessonslearnedrequirementsrin responsetoNRC800702ltdDISTRIBUTION CODEeA001SCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:jTITLE:GeneralDistribution forafterIssuanceofOperating LicenseNOTES;ILE:3copiesallmaterial.

Send3copiesofallmaterialtoIE,ED0500031505000316RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME ACTIONVARGArSe04INTERNAL:

D/DIRrHUM FAC0818,E06OF11GFILE01COPIESLTTRENCL131311RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME DIRrDIVOFLICNRCPDR02ORASSESSBR10COPIESLTTRENCL111110EXTERNAl:

ACRSNSIC0905ib1611LPDR03110<<aa)go~TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:

LTTRqOENCL krwa0l'lHkQj~~r INDIANALMICHIGANELECTRICCOMPANYP.O.BOX18BOWLINGGREENSTATIONNEWYORK,N.Y.10004December10,1980AEP:NRC:00449 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74LessonsLearnedTechnical Specifications CD*~C->a~cafOC<fIllRCDMr.HaroldR.Denton,DirectorOfficeofNuclearReactorRegulation U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555

DearMr.Denton:

Thisisinresponse'o Mr.D.Eisenhut's letterdatedJuly2,1980proposing Technical Specifications andcertainlicenseconditions fortheCategory"A"LessonsLearned(NUREG-0578) requirements implemented attheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.TheCookPlanthasbeenoperating withStandardTechnical Specifi-cations(STS).Assuch,manyofthechangessuggested inthemodelSTSfortheLessonsLearneditemscontained inMr.Eisenhut's letterarealreadyincludedintheCookPlantTechnical Specifications.

OurproposedTechnical Specifications (Attachment 2and3)arebasedonrevisi'ons totheexistingCookPlantTechnical Specifications forUnits1and2andwhereapplicable, updatedtoincludethescopeoftheCategory"A"itemsascontained intheSafetyEvaluation Report(SER)forCookPlantcompliance withtheCategory"A."requirements, issuedonMarch20,1980.Norevisions arebei'ngproposedtoaddresswordingdifferences orformatdeviations fromthosecontained inthemodelSTSfortheLessonsLearneditems.Attachment 1containsabriefdiscussion ofeachoftheTechnical Specification revisions proposedinAttachment 2and3.Attachment 4containstheproposedlicenseconditions

'forUnits1and2oftheCookPlant.Enallinstances thecontentofthemodelSTSofMr.Eisenhut's letterwasusedasguidanceinthepreparation oftheCookPlantspecificTechnical Specifi'cations.

oo/5

'I~s<tNllarf'IC,gI~,~C*'~I Nr.HaroldR.DentonDirectorAEP:NRC:00449 TheproposedTechnical Specification revisions andlicenseconditions contained intheAttachments tothisletterhavebeenreviewedbythePNSRCandtheNSDRCasrequiredbyourTechnical Specifications.

Thesereviewsconcluded thattheproposedTechnical Specification revisions andlicenseconditions donotconstitute anunreviewed safetyquestionandwillnotad-verselyaffectthehealthandsafetyofthepublic.I8MElectricCo.interprets 10CFR170asrequiring thatnofeeaccompany thissubmittal.

4Verytrulyyours,R.S.unterVicePresident cc:R.C.CallenG.CharnoffR.S.HunterR.W.Jurgensen D.V.Shaller-BridgmanNRCRegionIIIResidentInspector atCookPlant-Bridgman

'l ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:00449 Thisattachment brieflydescribes theTechnical Specification revisions contained inattachments 2and3toAEP:NRC:00449.

Therevisions toexistingCookPlantTechnical Specifications aredenotedbybarsintherighthandmargin.Theappropriate revisions totheBasesarealsoin-cludedintheseattacj'ments.

MeareorderingtheseTechnical Specifications

~changesinamannerconsistent withthenumbering ofourTechnical Specifi-cations.Auxiliary Feedwater SstemSecifications

'Thefollowing existingTechnical Specifications havebeenrevisedtoincorporate theautomatic initiation requirements intotheEngineered SafetyFeatureActuation Systemspecifications assetforthinthemodelTechnical Specifications ofMr.Eisenhut's letter.a}~Secification 3/4.7.1.2

-Units1and2(Page-3/4 7-6ofbothUnits)Mehaveremovedtheautomatic startingsignalslistedunderSurveillance Requirement 4.7.1.2.b re-placingthemwiththeappropriate ESFactuation testreference tobeperformed underSpecification 3/4.3.2.Thisisinaccordance withthemodelTechnical Specifi-cationsofl1r.Eisenhut's letter.b)Secification 3/4.3.2-Units1and2Tables3.3-3,3.3-4,3.3-5and4.3'-2ofbothUnits.1and2havebeenrevisedtoincorporate intothemtheautomatic initiation requirements forauxiliary feedwater.

Basically, therequirements formerlyinSpecification

-4.7.1.2.b havebeenincorporated intotheirappropriate sectionofSpecification 3/4.3.2.Thisincludesa)theLCOfortheinstrumentation, b)thesetpoints/allowable values,whereapplicable, c)thesystemresponsetimes'andd)theappropriate surveillance requirements.

OurexistingTechnical Specifications 3/4.3.2(units1and2)in-cludingtherecentamendments for."GridDegradedVoltage"havealreadypuimanyoftheAFHrequirements contained inthemodelTechnical Specifications ofMr.Eisenhut's letterintotheCookPlantTechnical Specifications.

Assuchveryfewrevisions tothesetablesarenecessary andareindicated oytherevisionbars'intherighthandmarginoftheaffectedpages.

0 Additionally, inUnit1only(Attachment 2),wehaveincludedundertheSafetyInjection functioninSpecification 3/4.3.2theautostartrequirement fortheHotorDrivenAuxiliary Feedwater Pumps(NDAFP)byre-visingtheheadingof"Functional Unit"Sectionl.ontables3.3-3(page3/43-16),3.3-4(page3/43-24)and4.3-2(page3/43-31)toincludethel<DAFP's.

Thisrequirement isalreadyincorporated inthecorresponding existingUnit2Technical Specifications andtheyneednotberevisedtomeettheLessonsLearnedrequirements.

Secification 3/4.3.3.8 ND!-Unit1Secification 3/4.3.3.6

-Unit2TheexistingTechnical Specification forPost-Accident Instru-mentation inUnit2hasbeenrevisedtoincludetheapplicable monitoring instrumentation fortheCategory"A"LessonsLearneditemsonTables3.3-10and4.3-10anddeletionoftheSteamGenerator widerangelevelindication fromthesametablesasapost-accident monitoring instrument.

TheUnit1Technical Specifications currently donotcontainaspecification forpost-accidentinstrumentation.

Assuch,therevisedUnit2Specification 3/4.3.3.6 isbeingproposedinitsentiretyinUnit1asanewSpecification 3/4.3.3.8.

Heareaddingthisattheendof.theInstrumentation sectionoftheUnit1Technical Specifications asanewitem'oavoidextensive pagerenumbering.

TheapprovedCookPlantpost-accident moritoringinstrumentation fortheCategory"A"LessonsLearneditemsinclude.(Reference 1):a)Auxiliary feedwater flowratechannels.

Thesechannelscanbesubstituted forbyusingthecorresponding steamgenerator waterlevelchannelintheeventthattheAFHflowratechannelsbecomeinoperable.

BothsystemssatisfytheLessonsLearnedrequirements (Reference 1).InthiscasetheLCOismetandnofurther-actionisre-quired.rb)RCSsubcooling marginmonitor.Thiscanbe.substituted forbyusingthePlantcomputer(PRODAC-250) readoutofsubcooling marginintheeventthatthesubcooling monitorbecomesinoperable.

BothsystemssatisfytheLessonsLearnedrequirements (Reference 1).InthiscasetheLCOismetandnofurtheractionisrequired.

c)PORVpositionindication.

Thestem-mounted limitswitchesprovidedirectvalvepositionindication incompliance withtheLessonLearnedrequirements.

Theacousticmonitoring systemindication whichisalsoinstalled, canbesubstituted forthelimitswitchin-dication.

BothsystemssatisfytheLessonsLearnedrequirements (Reference 1).InthiscasetheLCOismetandnofurtheractionisrequired.

3&40d)'ORVblockvalvepositionindication.

Thestem-mounted limitswit'ches providedirectvalvepositioniiydication incompliance withtheLessonsLearnedrequirements.

Pe)':Safetyvalvepositionindication.

Theacousticmonitoring systemprovidesthedirectvalvepositionindication incompliance withtheLessonsLearnedrequirements.

The"SteamGenerator WaterLevel-WideRange"channelhasbeen.deletedfromtheUnit2tables,andhasnotbeenincludedinthecorre-spondingproposedUnit1tablesforthefollowing reasons.TheSteamGenerator HideRangeHaterLevel(SGWRML)instrumentation doesnotperformanysafety-related functionandisnotassumedoperableinthevariousplant.safetyanalyses.

Assuch,theSGWRWLInstrumentation isnotincludedwithinthescopeofIEBulletinNo.'9-01B.

TheSGNarrowRangeWaterLevelInstrumentation (3channels/loop) isseismically andenvironmentally qualified andiscorrectly includedin.tableNos.3.3-10and4.3-10.Thenarrowrangeinstrumentation fulfillsallpost-accident monitoring require-mentsforSGlevelindication'nd isreferenced intheemergency operating procedures.

Secification 3/4.4.4-Units1and2TheexistingTechnical Specification forthePressurizer hasbeen.revisedtoinclude,withintheLimitingCondition forOperation (LCO),therequirement foroperability ofatleast150kWofheaters.Thisisthenecessary capacitytohaveavailable withinone(1)hourformaintaining adequatesubcooling while'ntherraturalcirculation coolingmode.TheexistingLCOcoversadequately therequirement forPressurizer levelin-strumentation sincethisequipment isusedtoverifythatthePressurizer isnon-water solidbymaintaining acertainwatervolume.Thevalueusedisconsistent withthatusedinourproposed.over-pressurization protection Technical Specification.

Thecorresponding ACTIONoftheLCOandtheSurveillance Requirements havebeenrevisedtoincludetheneviadditional requirements contained inthemodelTechnical Specifications ofHr.Eisenhut's July'2,1980letter.Secification 3/4.4.11-NEW-Units1and2TheproposedTechnical Specification fortheReactorCoolantSystemPowerOperatedReliefValves(PORVs)andBlockValves(BVs)isanewspecifi-cationfortheCookPlant.Wehaveappropriately includedthisspecification withinthesectionoftheTechnical Specifications coveringtheReactorCoolantSystem(3/4.4)andtoavoidextensive re-numbering ofexistingTechnical Spec-ifications weareaddingitattheendof'section 3/4.4asanewSpecification 3/4.4.11.

TheCookPlantdesigncontainsthree(3)PORYsandeachhasacorresponding BV:ThePORVsarespring-closed, air-to-open uponactuation oftheircorresponding solenoidcontrolvalve.ThesolenoidvalveandtheBVareelectrically operated(theBVbeingamotoroperatedvalve)andpow'eredfromtheemergency buses.Thegeneric)lestinghouse analysesperformed forafourloopplantinclude'onlytwoPORY'sandassociated BV's.TheproposedActionstate-mentallowsforoperational modechangesintheCookPlantwithone(1)ofthePORY'sorBV'sinoperable, providedofcoursethatthereliefpathis'solated.

Also,thereporting requirements arenotapplicable inthecaseofone(1)PORYorBVinoperable.

Thisadditional flexibility iswarranted sincetheCookPlantdesigndiffersfromthegeneric4loopwestinghouse Plantandsincetherequiremen't toisolatetheinoperable reliefpath(other-wiseshutdowntheplant)isnotwaived.AlloftheapprovedgenericanalysesremainvalidfortheCookPlantevenwithone'ORYorBV(reliefpath)in-operableandisolated.

Therearetwowaystoisolateareliefpathdepending onwhetherthePORY'ortheBVisinoperable.

Inthecaseofaninoperable PORY'which cannotberestoredtooperablestatustheassociated BYmustbeclosedandpowerremoved.Inthecaseofaninoperable BVwhichcannotberestoredtooperablestatusandtheBVcannotbeclosedor'owerremoved,theassociated PORVcanbeclosedandpowerremovedfromitsassociated SolenoidValve.'hese actionrequirements holdforallthree(3)ofCook'sPORY's/BV's other-wiseplantshutdownisrequired.

Theseprovisions areconsistent withthemodelTechnical Specifications contained inMr.Eisenhut's letter.Thepro-visiontoclosethePORVandremovepowerfromitsassociated SolenoidValvewithaninoperable BYassuresthatthereliefpathonce.isolatedinthismannerwillremainisolated.

OfcoursewhentestingtheBYandActionState-ments3.4.ll.aor3.4.1l.careapplied,theprovisions of4.0.4arenolongerapplicable sincethepreference istokeepthereliefpathwithinoperable equipment inanisolatedcondition.

Theexemption isincludedinthecorre-spondingsurveillance requirements.

Asmentioned abovethepowersuppliesfortheBV'sandthePORY'sarefromtheemergency buses.Thisisapermanent featureintheCookPlantdesign.Assuch,thesurveillance requirement fortestingof.theemergency powersuppliescontained inHr.Eisenhut's modelTechnical Specification doesnotapplytoCookPlantsincetheseelectrical powersourcesarepermanently connected totheemergency safeguards buses.Inordertomeettheintent'ofthemodelTechnical Specification surveillance requirement wehaveincludedtheprovision totestthePORV's/BV's whentheemergency safeguards busesareenergized bythedieselgenerators andplantbatteries inconjunction withthecorresponding 18monthssurveillance requirements for'thisequipment.

ThePORV'sandBV'sarejustanelectrical loadconnected totheemergency safeguards busesand,thus,therequiredsurveillance willbeperformed whenthesebusesareenergized fromtheiremergency powersources.

~~J InadditioninUnit1wehaverevisedSpecification 4.0.3onpage3/40-2tobeconsistent with4.0.3ofUnit2andnotrequiresurveillance oninoperable equipment.

Forexample,thisbecomesneces-sarywhenareliefpathisisolatedbecauseofinoperable equipment, vihoseoperation toperformrequiredsurveillance couldcausealossofRCSpressureboundary.

Performance oftheBYcyclingtestsuggested inthemodelTechnical Specifications whenthePORVinthesamereliefpathis.inoperable andtheBVhastobeclosedandmadeinoperable

{powerremoved).inaccordance withthecorresponding Actionrequirements wouldbeundesirable sinceitwouldrequirere-opening thatBV.Assuch,addingthisprovision

.to4.0.3inUnit1becomesnecessarv andagreeswit}i4.0.3inUnit2;----Table3.6-1:Containment'solation Valves-Units 1and2Asecond'fail-closed'ir operated.containment isolation valve,gCR-301,-isbeinginstalled intheletdown;line totheletdownheatex-changertoaddresstheNRCconcernsetforthinItem2.1.4oftheCommission safetyevaluation ofIMECo.compliance withtheCategory'A'essonLearnedRequirements datedMarch20,1980.Technical Specification Table3.6-1ofbothUnits1and2isbeingrevisedtoincorporate

'thisvalve.Therevisiontothisexistingspecification shouldbecomeeffective uponinstallation ofthenewcontainment isolation valve.Anexactinstallati'on datehasnotbeendetermined sincethisneviequipment.

hasalongprocurement leadtime(18mos.).Inanycase,arefueling outageisrequiredtoperformthismodification.

TherestoftheNRC-proposedTechnical Specification isalreadyapartoftheCookPlantTechnical Specifications.

Table6.2-1-.Units'1and2bTherequirement tohaveaShiftTechnical Advisor(STA)ondutyinModes1,2,354hasbeenincludedinthistableonTechnical Specifi-cationpage6-4forbothUnits1and2.ASTAisondutyforbothUnits1and2asasharedfunction(appropriately footnoted) incompliance withtheLessonsLearnedrequirements.

Secification 6.3-Units'1and2Thefacilitystaffqualification requirements havebeenrevisedtoincorporate thoserequirements applicable totheSTA.UndertheapprovedCookPlantSTAprogram,fullcompliance withthesestaffqualifi-'ationrequirements willbeachievedbyJanuary1,1981.MeproposethisTechnical Specification revisionnow{applicable tobothUnits182)totakeeffecton1/1/81incompliance withtheLessonsLearnedrequirements.

Reference 1:NRCSafetyEvaluation "Reportforcompliance withthecategory"A"LessonsLearnedrequirements datedMarch20,1980.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17331A517&oldid=736806"