ML17248A281: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
}} | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Poole, JustinSent:Tuesday, September 05, 2017 10:52 AMTo:Browne, KennethCc:Danna, James | |||
==Subject:== | |||
SEABROOK STATION UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: CHANGE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR DC BATTERIES (CAC NO. MG0046) | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
SEABROOK STATION UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: CHANGE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR DC BATTERIES (CAC NO. MG0046) By letter dated July 28, 2017, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Seabrook Station Unit No. 1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 230 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of August 1, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | |||
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | |||
Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPL I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3707 Mail Envelope Properties (Justin.Poole@nrc.gov20170905105100) | |||
==Subject:== | |||
SEABROOK STATION UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: CHANGE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR DC BATTERIES (CAC NO. MG0046) | |||
Sent Date: 9/5/2017 10:51:52 AM Received Date: 9/5/2017 10:51:00 AM From: Poole, Justin Created By: Justin.Poole@nrc.gov Recipients: "Danna, James" <James.Danna@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Browne, Kenneth" <Kenneth.J.Browne@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None | |||
Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2737 9/5/2017 10:51:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 08:29, 25 April 2018
| ML17248A281 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 09/05/2017 |
| From: | Justin Poole Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Browne K NextEra Energy Seabrook |
| References | |
| MG0046 | |
| Download: ML17248A281 (2) | |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Poole, JustinSent:Tuesday, September 05, 2017 10:52 AMTo:Browne, KennethCc:Danna, James
Subject:
SEABROOK STATION UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: CHANGE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR DC BATTERIES (CAC NO. MG0046)
SUBJECT:
SEABROOK STATION UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: CHANGE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR DC BATTERIES (CAC NO. MG0046) By letter dated July 28, 2017, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Seabrook Station Unit No. 1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 230 hours0.00266 days <br />0.0639 hours <br />3.80291e-4 weeks <br />8.7515e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of August 1, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPL I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048 Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3707 Mail Envelope Properties (Justin.Poole@nrc.gov20170905105100)
Subject:
SEABROOK STATION UNIT NO. 1 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: CHANGE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR DC BATTERIES (CAC NO. MG0046)
Sent Date: 9/5/2017 10:51:52 AM Received Date: 9/5/2017 10:51:00 AM From: Poole, Justin Created By: Justin.Poole@nrc.gov Recipients: "Danna, James" <James.Danna@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Browne, Kenneth" <Kenneth.J.Browne@nexteraenergy.com> Tracking Status: None
Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2737 9/5/2017 10:51:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: