Information Notice 2015-03, Improper Operation of Spent Fuel Storage Equipment Leading to Elevated Radiation Levels Adjacent to Spent Fuel Transfer Cask: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 5 | | page count = 5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | {{#Wiki_filter:ML14213A477 UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS | OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS | ||
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 February 9, 2015 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2015-03: | WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 | ||
February 9, 2015 | |||
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2015-03: | |||
IMPROPER OPERATION OF SPENT FUEL | |||
TRANSFER CASK NEUTRON SHIELD | TRANSFER CASK NEUTRON SHIELD | ||
| Line 38: | Line 43: | ||
==PURPOSE== | ==PURPOSE== | ||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to: | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to: | ||
* | |||
Inform addressees of improper operation of spent fuel transfer cask neutron shield | |||
equipment that resulted in elevated area radiation levels and unplanned dose to | equipment that resulted in elevated area radiation levels and unplanned dose to | ||
| Line 45: | Line 52: | ||
personnel | personnel | ||
* | * | ||
Make addressees aware of vulnerabilities in procedures and equipment design that | |||
could inadvertently cause unexpected high levels of radiation from improper operations | could inadvertently cause unexpected high levels of radiation from improper operations | ||
| Line 51: | Line 59: | ||
The NRC expects recipients to review the information for applicability to their facilities and to | The NRC expects recipients to review the information for applicability to their facilities and to | ||
consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in | consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in | ||
this IN are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required. | this IN are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required. | ||
==BACKGROUND== | ==BACKGROUND== | ||
Description of Spent Fuel Storage System | |||
The dry shielded canister used at the facilities discussed in this information notice is a high | The dry shielded canister used at the facilities discussed in this information notice is a high | ||
integrity stainless steel welded pressure vessel that confines fuel assemblies from a boiling | integrity stainless steel welded pressure vessel that confines fuel assemblies from a boiling | ||
water reactor and maintains an internal helium atmosphere. Stainless steel cover plates and | water reactor and maintains an internal helium atmosphere. Stainless steel cover plates and | ||
thick carbon steel shielding material form the top and bottom end of the dry shielded canister. | thick carbon steel shielding material form the top and bottom end of the dry shielded canister. | ||
| Line 68: | Line 76: | ||
The top and bottom cover plates are double seal welded to the stainless steel cylindrical shell to | The top and bottom cover plates are double seal welded to the stainless steel cylindrical shell to | ||
form the dry shielded canisters containment pressure boundary. The transfer cask is a | form the dry shielded canisters containment pressure boundary. The transfer cask is a | ||
non-pressure retaining double shell cylindrical vessel with a welded bottom plate and bolted top | non-pressure retaining double shell cylindrical vessel with a welded bottom plate and bolted top | ||
cover plate. The space between the shells contains radiological shielding material. | cover plate. The space between the shells contains radiological shielding material. | ||
The transfer cask is designed for on-site transport of the dry shielded canister to and from the | The transfer cask is designed for on-site transport of the dry shielded canister to and from the | ||
plants spent fuel pool and the ISFSI. The transfer cask provides the principal radiological | plants spent fuel pool and the ISFSI. The transfer cask provides the principal radiological shielding and heat rejection mechanism for the dry shielded canister and spent nuclear fuel | ||
assemblies during handling in the fuel building, dry shielded canister closure operations, transport to the ISFSI, and transfer to the horizontal storage module. The transfer cask also | |||
assemblies during handling in the fuel building, dry shielded canister closure operations, transport to the ISFSI, and transfer to the horizontal storage module. The transfer cask also | |||
provides primary protection for the loaded dry shielded canister during off-normal and load | provides primary protection for the loaded dry shielded canister during off-normal and load | ||
drop-accidents postulated to occur during the transport operations. The transfer cask includes | drop-accidents postulated to occur during the transport operations. The transfer cask includes | ||
an outer steel jacket that makes up the outer boundary of the integral neutron shield tank, which | an outer steel jacket that makes up the outer boundary of the integral neutron shield tank, which | ||
is filled with water for neutron shielding. The transfer cask outer cylindrical shell makes up the | is filled with water for neutron shielding. The transfer cask outer cylindrical shell makes up the | ||
inner boundary of the neutron shield tank. | inner boundary of the neutron shield tank. | ||
| Line 96: | Line 102: | ||
overflow tank is connected to the vent port of the neutron shield tank to act as an expansion | overflow tank is connected to the vent port of the neutron shield tank to act as an expansion | ||
volume and makeup source to account for volumetric changes in the shield water. The space | volume and makeup source to account for volumetric changes in the shield water. The space | ||
between the outside surface of the dry shielded canister and the inside surface of the transfer | between the outside surface of the dry shielded canister and the inside surface of the transfer | ||
cask is referred to as the transfer cask annulus. This volume is filled and subsequently emptied | cask is referred to as the transfer cask annulus. This volume is filled and subsequently emptied | ||
during cask loading operations. | during cask loading operations. | ||
| Line 109: | Line 115: | ||
notably neutron radiation) that were higher than expected adjacent to spent fuel storage transfer | notably neutron radiation) that were higher than expected adjacent to spent fuel storage transfer | ||
casks, and (2) unplanned personnel dose. Both facilities, the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) | casks, and (2) unplanned personnel dose. Both facilities, the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS) | ||
and Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), utilized a Transnuclear (TN) NUHOMS-61BT | and Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), utilized a Transnuclear (TN) NUHOMS-61BT | ||
CoC No. 1004 (Amendment 9) fuel storage system. | CoC No. 1004 (Amendment 9) fuel storage system. | ||
Cooper Nuclear Station | |||
In November 2010, a TN NUHOMS-61BT dry shielded canister was located in the reactor | In November 2010, a TN NUHOMS-61BT dry shielded canister was located in the reactor | ||
buildings railroad airlock area on a transport trailer awaiting final preparations for transport to | buildings railroad airlock area on a transport trailer awaiting final preparations for transport to | ||
the ISFSI. Before transport, residual water is normally drained from the transfer cask annulus. | the ISFSI. Before transport, residual water is normally drained from the transfer cask annulus. | ||
The drain hose was mistakenly connected to the neutron shield tank drain port instead of the | The drain hose was mistakenly connected to the neutron shield tank drain port instead of the | ||
transfer cask annulus drain port. Over time, the opening of the neutron shield tank drain port | transfer cask annulus drain port. Over time, the opening of the neutron shield tank drain port | ||
caused water to be siphoned and discharged from the neutron shield tank out through the drain | caused water to be siphoned and discharged from the neutron shield tank out through the drain | ||
hose connected to the neutron shield tank drain port. Approximately 40 percent (220.8 gallons) | hose connected to the neutron shield tank drain port. Approximately 40 percent (220.8 gallons) | ||
of the neutron shield volume drained onto the floor under the dry shielded canister. This | of the neutron shield volume drained onto the floor under the dry shielded canister. This | ||
resulted in higher than expected neutron dose rates near the spent fuel transfer cask. The | resulted in higher than expected neutron dose rates near the spent fuel transfer cask. The | ||
unintentional draining of the transfer cask neutron shield resulted in a temporary halt to ISFSI | unintentional draining of the transfer cask neutron shield resulted in a temporary halt to ISFSI | ||
work and an increase in dose to the workers involved. Twenty employees at CNS received an | work and an increase in dose to the workers involved. Twenty employees at CNS received an | ||
unplanned dose. | unplanned dose. | ||
| Line 146: | Line 153: | ||
(ADAMS) under accession No. ML12192A620. | (ADAMS) under accession No. ML12192A620. | ||
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station | |||
In August 2013, SSES began loading spent fuel assemblies into a TN NUHOMS-61BT dry | In August 2013, SSES began loading spent fuel assemblies into a TN NUHOMS-61BT dry | ||
shielded canister. Procedures directed SSES personnel to attach a neutron shield | shielded canister. Procedures directed SSES personnel to attach a neutron shield | ||
pressurization tank to the neutron shield tank vent connection port on the transfer cask to | pressurization tank to the neutron shield tank vent connection port on the transfer cask to | ||
ensure that the neutron shield tank was full. No water was observed to flow into the neutron shield tank and SSES personnel concluded that the neutron shield tank was full. The loaded | ensure that the neutron shield tank was full. No water was observed to flow into the neutron shield tank and SSES personnel concluded that the neutron shield tank was full. The loaded | ||
transfer cask/dry shielded canister was moved out of the cask storage pit of the spent fuel pool | transfer cask/dry shielded canister was moved out of the cask storage pit of the spent fuel pool | ||
after loading. The dry shielded canister inner top cover was welded in place and initial draining | after loading. The dry shielded canister inner top cover was welded in place and initial draining | ||
of the dry shielded canister commenced. Health Physics technicians observed neutron dose | of the dry shielded canister commenced. Health Physics technicians observed neutron dose | ||
rates that were higher than expected and restricted access to the side of the transfer cask. | rates that were higher than expected and restricted access to the side of the transfer cask. | ||
| Line 165: | Line 173: | ||
Subsequently, a secondary indication of increased dose rates was reported after chemistry | Subsequently, a secondary indication of increased dose rates was reported after chemistry | ||
personnel observed that radiation monitors in the area were reading higher than normal. In | personnel observed that radiation monitors in the area were reading higher than normal. In | ||
reaction to the increased dose rates, maintenance personnel exercised the fitting, repositioned | reaction to the increased dose rates, maintenance personnel exercised the fitting, repositioned | ||
the neutron shield pressurization tank, and observed it drain into the neutron shield tank, indicating the neutron shield tank was not full. SSES then filled the transfer cask neutron shield | the neutron shield pressurization tank, and observed it drain into the neutron shield tank, indicating the neutron shield tank was not full. SSES then filled the transfer cask neutron shield | ||
tank using a fill line that was already connected to the fill port. Health Physics technicians | tank using a fill line that was already connected to the fill port. Health Physics technicians | ||
surveyed and confirmed that neutron dose rates returned to expected levels. Dosimeters were | surveyed and confirmed that neutron dose rates returned to expected levels. Dosimeters were | ||
collected from the workers and read. No appreciable amount of dose was distinguishable from | collected from the workers and read. No appreciable amount of dose was distinguishable from | ||
background readings. SSES determined that the neutron shield tank was not filled in | background readings. SSES determined that the neutron shield tank was not filled in | ||
preparation for this loading campaign. A hydraulic lock or air binding developed in the hose | preparation for this loading campaign. A hydraulic lock or air binding developed in the hose | ||
from the neutron shield pressurization tank which prevented the flow of water from the neutron | from the neutron shield pressurization tank which prevented the flow of water from the neutron | ||
shield pressurization tank into the neutron shield tank. This caused a false indication that the | shield pressurization tank into the neutron shield tank. This caused a false indication that the | ||
neutron shield tank was full. | neutron shield tank was full. | ||
| Line 198: | Line 206: | ||
In both events, radiation levels that were higher than expected, including levels of neutron | In both events, radiation levels that were higher than expected, including levels of neutron | ||
radiation, were experienced near the spent fuel casks because of a combination of cask design, operation, and human error. The design of the transfer cask uses shielding that consists of | radiation, were experienced near the spent fuel casks because of a combination of cask design, operation, and human error. The design of the transfer cask uses shielding that consists of | ||
layers of stainless steel, carbon steel, and lead to reduce gamma, beta, and alpha radiation. | layers of stainless steel, carbon steel, and lead to reduce gamma, beta, and alpha radiation. | ||
| Line 204: | Line 212: | ||
Neutron radiation is shielded by water in the neutron shield tank, which can be filled and drained | Neutron radiation is shielded by water in the neutron shield tank, which can be filled and drained | ||
through the neutron shield tank vent and drain ports. The transfer cask is also equipped with an | through the neutron shield tank vent and drain ports. The transfer cask is also equipped with an | ||
annulus drain port, which is identical in size and construction to the neutron shield tank vent and | annulus drain port, which is identical in size and construction to the neutron shield tank vent and | ||
drain ports. The vendor did not provide any form of identification or marking to distinguish | drain ports. The vendor did not provide any form of identification or marking to distinguish | ||
between these ports. After the spent fuel assemblies are loaded into the dry shielded canister | between these ports. After the spent fuel assemblies are loaded into the dry shielded canister | ||
and it is sealed with the first of two cover plates, water surrounding the fuel is removed and the | and it is sealed with the first of two cover plates, water surrounding the fuel is removed and the | ||
interior of the sealed dry shielded canister is vacuum-dried and backfilled with helium. Now that | interior of the sealed dry shielded canister is vacuum-dried and backfilled with helium. Now that | ||
the water inside the dry shielded canister (which had protected personnel with its | the water inside the dry shielded canister (which had protected personnel with its | ||
| Line 224: | Line 232: | ||
Unanticipated neutron dose at CNS occurred because of the lack of shield water in the transfer | Unanticipated neutron dose at CNS occurred because of the lack of shield water in the transfer | ||
cask neutron shield tank. Before being transported to the ISFSI pad, the transfer cask annulus | cask neutron shield tank. Before being transported to the ISFSI pad, the transfer cask annulus | ||
drain valve was to be opened to remove any residual water in the annulus space between the | drain valve was to be opened to remove any residual water in the annulus space between the | ||
transfer cask and the dry shielded canister. The bottom of the transfer cask was configured with | transfer cask and the dry shielded canister. The bottom of the transfer cask was configured with | ||
three fill and drain ports that were identical and not identified by labels or tags. Two of the ports | three fill and drain ports that were identical and not identified by labels or tags. Two of the ports | ||
were for the transfer cask neutron shield tank vent and fill lines and the third was to drain the | were for the transfer cask neutron shield tank vent and fill lines and the third was to drain the | ||
| Line 236: | Line 244: | ||
annulus space if water was still present after dry shielded canister loading and processing | annulus space if water was still present after dry shielded canister loading and processing | ||
operations were completed. CNS personnel failed to connect the drain line to the annulus drain | operations were completed. CNS personnel failed to connect the drain line to the annulus drain | ||
port, but instead, connected it to the neutron shield tank drain port, which resulted in the partial | port, but instead, connected it to the neutron shield tank drain port, which resulted in the partial | ||
draining of the neutron shield tank. When workers opened the neutron shield tank drain port, water did not immediately flow out of the neutron shield tank. This was because a siphoning | draining of the neutron shield tank. When workers opened the neutron shield tank drain port, water did not immediately flow out of the neutron shield tank. This was because a siphoning | ||
action was transferring water to a pressurization tank through the transfer cask neutron shield | action was transferring water to a pressurization tank through the transfer cask neutron shield | ||
tank vent port. One CNS worker did notice that water had flowed into the neutron shield | tank vent port. One CNS worker did notice that water had flowed into the neutron shield | ||
pressurization tank, but failed to realize that this indicated that the drain line was connected | pressurization tank, but failed to realize that this indicated that the drain line was connected | ||
incorrectly to the neutron shield tank drain port. There are no other design features for this cask | incorrectly to the neutron shield tank drain port. There are no other design features for this cask | ||
type that would allow workers to determine the transfer cask neutron shield tank level. After the | type that would allow workers to determine the transfer cask neutron shield tank level. After the | ||
siphoning action stopped, the neutron shield tank partially drained, which resulted in increased | siphoning action stopped, the neutron shield tank partially drained, which resulted in increased | ||
| Line 264: | Line 272: | ||
properly drained as part of the Dry Fuel Storage demobilization work package and documented | properly drained as part of the Dry Fuel Storage demobilization work package and documented | ||
as specified in the SSES procedure. However, SSES personnel failed to fill the transfer cask | as specified in the SSES procedure. However, SSES personnel failed to fill the transfer cask | ||
neutron shield tank before this loading campaign, as required by procedure. When checking the | neutron shield tank before this loading campaign, as required by procedure. When checking the | ||
level of the neutron shield tank, air binding of the line between the neutron shield pressurization | level of the neutron shield tank, air binding of the line between the neutron shield pressurization | ||
| Line 272: | Line 280: | ||
tank and neutron shield tank occurred, preventing the flow of water from the neutron shield | tank and neutron shield tank occurred, preventing the flow of water from the neutron shield | ||
pressurization tank to the neutron shield tank. The neutron shield pressurization tank, once | pressurization tank to the neutron shield tank. The neutron shield pressurization tank, once | ||
connected, provides the only means to verify adequate level in the neutron shield tank. | connected, provides the only means to verify adequate level in the neutron shield tank. | ||
| Line 278: | Line 286: | ||
Maintenance personnel received a false indication that the neutron shield tank was full because | Maintenance personnel received a false indication that the neutron shield tank was full because | ||
the neutron shield pressurization tank level did not change. During operations, SSES noted that | the neutron shield pressurization tank level did not change. During operations, SSES noted that | ||
the pressurization tank emptied, which was not a normal occurrence. They refilled the neutron | the pressurization tank emptied, which was not a normal occurrence. They refilled the neutron | ||
shield pressurization tank, but failed to determine the cause, challenge existing conditions, or | shield pressurization tank, but failed to determine the cause, challenge existing conditions, or | ||
recognize this as an indication that the neutron shield tank was not filled. After refilling the | recognize this as an indication that the neutron shield tank was not filled. After refilling the | ||
neutron shield pressurization tank, air binding prevented outflow from the neutron shield | neutron shield pressurization tank, air binding prevented outflow from the neutron shield | ||
| Line 296: | Line 304: | ||
kept doses below the technical specification maximum allowable levels adjacent to the dry | kept doses below the technical specification maximum allowable levels adjacent to the dry | ||
shielded canister. Proper monitoring programs and health physics procedures alerted the staff | shielded canister. Proper monitoring programs and health physics procedures alerted the staff | ||
to unexpected radiological conditions and prevented further dose to workers before the initial | to unexpected radiological conditions and prevented further dose to workers before the initial | ||
| Line 304: | Line 312: | ||
Based on the event at Cooper, TN now provides a transfer cask with color-coded and keyed | Based on the event at Cooper, TN now provides a transfer cask with color-coded and keyed | ||
Swagelok fittings at each site where the transfer cask is provided. The fittings are installed at | Swagelok fittings at each site where the transfer cask is provided. The fittings are installed at | ||
the annulus and neutron shield tank connections so that one cannot connect the line for the | the annulus and neutron shield tank connections so that one cannot connect the line for the | ||
neutron shield tank to the annulus and vice versa. CNS also performed procedural revisions | neutron shield tank to the annulus and vice versa. CNS also performed procedural revisions | ||
that include verification of the proper Swagelok fittings during receipt of the transfer cask. | that include verification of the proper Swagelok fittings during receipt of the transfer cask. | ||
| Line 318: | Line 326: | ||
shield tank drain port and verify water exits from the vent port into the neutron shield | shield tank drain port and verify water exits from the vent port into the neutron shield | ||
pressurization tank. When the neutron shield tank drain port is not accessible, TN | pressurization tank. When the neutron shield tank drain port is not accessible, TN | ||
recommended that users should remove the neutron shield tank pressure relief valve opposite | recommended that users should remove the neutron shield tank pressure relief valve opposite | ||
| Line 324: | Line 332: | ||
the neutron shield tank vent line and add water into either the pressure relief port or the neutron | the neutron shield tank vent line and add water into either the pressure relief port or the neutron | ||
shield pressurization tank and verify water exits the opposite port. SSES revised their | shield pressurization tank and verify water exits the opposite port. SSES revised their | ||
procedures to incorporate the new method to verify the neutron shield tank is filled with water. | procedures to incorporate the new method to verify the neutron shield tank is filled with water. | ||
| Line 332: | Line 340: | ||
equipment to determine whether current neutron shield water level is susceptible to false | equipment to determine whether current neutron shield water level is susceptible to false | ||
indications as described above. To achieve this objective, consider the human factors and design deficiencies to ensure that adequate controls and steps are in place to prevent the | indications as described above. To achieve this objective, consider the human factors and design deficiencies to ensure that adequate controls and steps are in place to prevent the | ||
inadvertent loss or inaccurate indication of neutron shield water. | inadvertent loss or inaccurate indication of neutron shield water. | ||
==CONTACT== | ==CONTACT== | ||
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any | This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any | ||
questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate Office of | questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate Office of | ||
| Line 343: | Line 351: | ||
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards project manager. | Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards project manager. | ||
/RA/ | /RA/ | ||
Mark Lombard, Director | |||
Division of Spent Fuel Management | Division of Spent Fuel Management | ||
| Line 353: | Line 362: | ||
===Technical Contact:=== | ===Technical Contact:=== | ||
Jeremy Tapp, NMSS | |||
301-287-9218 E-mail: Jeremy.Tapp@nrc.gov | |||
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections | Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections | ||
ML14213A477 | ML14213A477 | ||
* concurred via email | * concurred via email | ||
OFC | OFC | ||
NMSS/DSFM | |||
NMSS/DSFM | |||
NMSS/DSFM/LA NMSS/DSFM NMSS/DSFM NMSS/DSFM | |||
NAME EAllen | |||
JTapp | |||
WWheatley | |||
ELove* | |||
MSampson | |||
PSilva | |||
DATE | |||
08/05/2014 | |||
08/13/2014 | |||
08/28/2014 | |||
08/28/2014 | |||
09/24/2014 | |||
09/18/2014 OFC | |||
ADM/DAS/PB NMSS/MSTR | |||
RES/DRA | |||
RI/DNMS | |||
RII/DRS | |||
RIII/DNMS | |||
NAME CHsu* | |||
AMcIntosh | |||
SEPeters* | |||
MFerdas* | |||
SWalker* | |||
ROrlikowski* | |||
DATE | |||
10/2/2014 | |||
10/28/2014 | |||
11/6/2014 | |||
12/16/2014 | |||
01/06/2015 | |||
01/09/2015 OFC | |||
RIV/DNMS | |||
NRR/DPR/PGCB/LA NMSS/DSFM | |||
NMSS/DSFM | |||
NAME | NAME RKellar* | ||
ELee | |||
AHsia | |||
MLombard | |||
DATE | |||
01/06/2015 | |||
02/18/2015 | |||
02/08/2015 | |||
02/09/2015}} | |||
{{Information notice-Nav}} | {{Information notice-Nav}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:36, 10 January 2025
| ML14213A477 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/09/2015 |
| From: | Mark Lombard NRC/NMSS/SFST |
| To: | |
| Tapp J | |
| References | |
| IN-15-013 | |
| Download: ML14213A477 (5) | |
ML14213A477 UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001
February 9, 2015
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2015-03:
IMPROPER OPERATION OF SPENT FUEL
TRANSFER CASK NEUTRON SHIELD
EQUIPMENT LEADING TO ELEVATED
RADIATION LEVELS ADJACENT TO SPENT
FUEL TRANSFER CASK
ADDRESSEES
All holders of and applicants for an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) license or
a certificate of compliance (CoC) under Title 10, Energy, of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) Part 72, Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste.
PURPOSE
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to:
Inform addressees of improper operation of spent fuel transfer cask neutron shield
equipment that resulted in elevated area radiation levels and unplanned dose to
personnel
Make addressees aware of vulnerabilities in procedures and equipment design that
could inadvertently cause unexpected high levels of radiation from improper operations
The NRC expects recipients to review the information for applicability to their facilities and to
consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in
this IN are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
BACKGROUND
Description of Spent Fuel Storage System
The dry shielded canister used at the facilities discussed in this information notice is a high
integrity stainless steel welded pressure vessel that confines fuel assemblies from a boiling
water reactor and maintains an internal helium atmosphere. Stainless steel cover plates and
thick carbon steel shielding material form the top and bottom end of the dry shielded canister.
The top and bottom cover plates are double seal welded to the stainless steel cylindrical shell to
form the dry shielded canisters containment pressure boundary. The transfer cask is a
non-pressure retaining double shell cylindrical vessel with a welded bottom plate and bolted top
cover plate. The space between the shells contains radiological shielding material.
The transfer cask is designed for on-site transport of the dry shielded canister to and from the
plants spent fuel pool and the ISFSI. The transfer cask provides the principal radiological shielding and heat rejection mechanism for the dry shielded canister and spent nuclear fuel
assemblies during handling in the fuel building, dry shielded canister closure operations, transport to the ISFSI, and transfer to the horizontal storage module. The transfer cask also
provides primary protection for the loaded dry shielded canister during off-normal and load
drop-accidents postulated to occur during the transport operations. The transfer cask includes
an outer steel jacket that makes up the outer boundary of the integral neutron shield tank, which
is filled with water for neutron shielding. The transfer cask outer cylindrical shell makes up the
inner boundary of the neutron shield tank.
During operation, a small 5-gallon tank called the neutron shield pressurization tank or an
overflow tank is connected to the vent port of the neutron shield tank to act as an expansion
volume and makeup source to account for volumetric changes in the shield water. The space
between the outside surface of the dry shielded canister and the inside surface of the transfer
cask is referred to as the transfer cask annulus. This volume is filled and subsequently emptied
during cask loading operations.
DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES
Distinctly different incidents at two nuclear facilities resulted in (1) levels of radiation (most
notably neutron radiation) that were higher than expected adjacent to spent fuel storage transfer
casks, and (2) unplanned personnel dose. Both facilities, the Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS)
and Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), utilized a Transnuclear (TN) NUHOMS-61BT
CoC No. 1004 (Amendment 9) fuel storage system.
Cooper Nuclear Station
In November 2010, a TN NUHOMS-61BT dry shielded canister was located in the reactor
buildings railroad airlock area on a transport trailer awaiting final preparations for transport to
the ISFSI. Before transport, residual water is normally drained from the transfer cask annulus.
The drain hose was mistakenly connected to the neutron shield tank drain port instead of the
transfer cask annulus drain port. Over time, the opening of the neutron shield tank drain port
caused water to be siphoned and discharged from the neutron shield tank out through the drain
hose connected to the neutron shield tank drain port. Approximately 40 percent (220.8 gallons)
of the neutron shield volume drained onto the floor under the dry shielded canister. This
resulted in higher than expected neutron dose rates near the spent fuel transfer cask. The
unintentional draining of the transfer cask neutron shield resulted in a temporary halt to ISFSI
work and an increase in dose to the workers involved. Twenty employees at CNS received an
unplanned dose.
Additional information is available in Cooper Nuclear Station Inspection of the Independent
Spent Fuel Storage Installation Report Nos. 05000298/2010009 and 07200066/2010001, dated
July 10, 2012 and available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS) under accession No. ML12192A620.
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station
In August 2013, SSES began loading spent fuel assemblies into a TN NUHOMS-61BT dry
shielded canister. Procedures directed SSES personnel to attach a neutron shield
pressurization tank to the neutron shield tank vent connection port on the transfer cask to
ensure that the neutron shield tank was full. No water was observed to flow into the neutron shield tank and SSES personnel concluded that the neutron shield tank was full. The loaded
transfer cask/dry shielded canister was moved out of the cask storage pit of the spent fuel pool
after loading. The dry shielded canister inner top cover was welded in place and initial draining
of the dry shielded canister commenced. Health Physics technicians observed neutron dose
rates that were higher than expected and restricted access to the side of the transfer cask.
Subsequently, a secondary indication of increased dose rates was reported after chemistry
personnel observed that radiation monitors in the area were reading higher than normal. In
reaction to the increased dose rates, maintenance personnel exercised the fitting, repositioned
the neutron shield pressurization tank, and observed it drain into the neutron shield tank, indicating the neutron shield tank was not full. SSES then filled the transfer cask neutron shield
tank using a fill line that was already connected to the fill port. Health Physics technicians
surveyed and confirmed that neutron dose rates returned to expected levels. Dosimeters were
collected from the workers and read. No appreciable amount of dose was distinguishable from
background readings. SSES determined that the neutron shield tank was not filled in
preparation for this loading campaign. A hydraulic lock or air binding developed in the hose
from the neutron shield pressurization tank which prevented the flow of water from the neutron
shield pressurization tank into the neutron shield tank. This caused a false indication that the
neutron shield tank was full.
Additional information is available in Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2; Flood
Protection Measures, Surveillance Testing, and Drill Evaluation Report
Nos. 05000387/2013005, 05000388/2013005, and 07200028/2013001, dated
February 14, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14045A295).
DISCUSSION
In both events, radiation levels that were higher than expected, including levels of neutron
radiation, were experienced near the spent fuel casks because of a combination of cask design, operation, and human error. The design of the transfer cask uses shielding that consists of
layers of stainless steel, carbon steel, and lead to reduce gamma, beta, and alpha radiation.
Neutron radiation is shielded by water in the neutron shield tank, which can be filled and drained
through the neutron shield tank vent and drain ports. The transfer cask is also equipped with an
annulus drain port, which is identical in size and construction to the neutron shield tank vent and
drain ports. The vendor did not provide any form of identification or marking to distinguish
between these ports. After the spent fuel assemblies are loaded into the dry shielded canister
and it is sealed with the first of two cover plates, water surrounding the fuel is removed and the
interior of the sealed dry shielded canister is vacuum-dried and backfilled with helium. Now that
the water inside the dry shielded canister (which had protected personnel with its
neutron-shielding properties) is no longer present, the transfer cask neutron shield must be able
to shield neutrons originating from the spent nuclear fuel.
Unanticipated neutron dose at CNS occurred because of the lack of shield water in the transfer
cask neutron shield tank. Before being transported to the ISFSI pad, the transfer cask annulus
drain valve was to be opened to remove any residual water in the annulus space between the
transfer cask and the dry shielded canister. The bottom of the transfer cask was configured with
three fill and drain ports that were identical and not identified by labels or tags. Two of the ports
were for the transfer cask neutron shield tank vent and fill lines and the third was to drain the
annulus space if water was still present after dry shielded canister loading and processing
operations were completed. CNS personnel failed to connect the drain line to the annulus drain
port, but instead, connected it to the neutron shield tank drain port, which resulted in the partial
draining of the neutron shield tank. When workers opened the neutron shield tank drain port, water did not immediately flow out of the neutron shield tank. This was because a siphoning
action was transferring water to a pressurization tank through the transfer cask neutron shield
tank vent port. One CNS worker did notice that water had flowed into the neutron shield
pressurization tank, but failed to realize that this indicated that the drain line was connected
incorrectly to the neutron shield tank drain port. There are no other design features for this cask
type that would allow workers to determine the transfer cask neutron shield tank level. After the
siphoning action stopped, the neutron shield tank partially drained, which resulted in increased
neutron dose rates and unanticipated neutron dose to workers.
The event at SSES resulted in increased levels of neutron radiation above those expected in the
area adjacent to the transfer cask once the water was drained from the dry shielded canister.
When the previous loading campaign was completed, the transfer cask neutron shield tank was
properly drained as part of the Dry Fuel Storage demobilization work package and documented
as specified in the SSES procedure. However, SSES personnel failed to fill the transfer cask
neutron shield tank before this loading campaign, as required by procedure. When checking the
level of the neutron shield tank, air binding of the line between the neutron shield pressurization
tank and neutron shield tank occurred, preventing the flow of water from the neutron shield
pressurization tank to the neutron shield tank. The neutron shield pressurization tank, once
connected, provides the only means to verify adequate level in the neutron shield tank.
Maintenance personnel received a false indication that the neutron shield tank was full because
the neutron shield pressurization tank level did not change. During operations, SSES noted that
the pressurization tank emptied, which was not a normal occurrence. They refilled the neutron
shield pressurization tank, but failed to determine the cause, challenge existing conditions, or
recognize this as an indication that the neutron shield tank was not filled. After refilling the
neutron shield pressurization tank, air binding prevented outflow from the neutron shield
pressurization tank to the neutron shield tank and it was assumed, again, that the neutron shield
tank was full.
The cask shielding design and spent fuel assembly distribution within the dry shielded canister
kept doses below the technical specification maximum allowable levels adjacent to the dry
shielded canister. Proper monitoring programs and health physics procedures alerted the staff
to unexpected radiological conditions and prevented further dose to workers before the initial
cause was determined.
Based on the event at Cooper, TN now provides a transfer cask with color-coded and keyed
Swagelok fittings at each site where the transfer cask is provided. The fittings are installed at
the annulus and neutron shield tank connections so that one cannot connect the line for the
neutron shield tank to the annulus and vice versa. CNS also performed procedural revisions
that include verification of the proper Swagelok fittings during receipt of the transfer cask.
Based on the event at SSES, TN provided its users with guidance on how to verify that the
neutron shield tank is full of water by specifying that users should add water to the neutron
shield tank drain port and verify water exits from the vent port into the neutron shield
pressurization tank. When the neutron shield tank drain port is not accessible, TN
recommended that users should remove the neutron shield tank pressure relief valve opposite
the neutron shield tank vent line and add water into either the pressure relief port or the neutron
shield pressurization tank and verify water exits the opposite port. SSES revised their
procedures to incorporate the new method to verify the neutron shield tank is filled with water.
It is recommended that cask vendors and licensees evaluate their operating procedures and
equipment to determine whether current neutron shield water level is susceptible to false
indications as described above. To achieve this objective, consider the human factors and design deficiencies to ensure that adequate controls and steps are in place to prevent the
inadvertent loss or inaccurate indication of neutron shield water.
CONTACT
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any
questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below or to the appropriate Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards project manager.
/RA/
Mark Lombard, Director
Division of Spent Fuel Management
Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards
Technical Contact:
301-287-9218 E-mail: Jeremy.Tapp@nrc.gov
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections
- concurred via email
OFC
NMSS/DSFM
NMSS/DSFM
NMSS/DSFM/LA NMSS/DSFM NMSS/DSFM NMSS/DSFM
NAME EAllen
JTapp
WWheatley
ELove*
MSampson
PSilva
DATE
08/05/2014
08/13/2014
08/28/2014
08/28/2014
09/24/2014
09/18/2014 OFC
ADM/DAS/PB NMSS/MSTR
RES/DRA
RI/DNMS
RII/DRS
RIII/DNMS
NAME CHsu*
AMcIntosh
SEPeters*
MFerdas*
SWalker*
ROrlikowski*
DATE
10/2/2014
10/28/2014
11/6/2014
12/16/2014
01/06/2015
01/09/2015 OFC
RIV/DNMS
NRR/DPR/PGCB/LA NMSS/DSFM
NMSS/DSFM
NAME RKellar*
ELee
AHsia
MLombard
DATE
01/06/2015
02/18/2015
02/08/2015
02/09/2015