ML20024B306

Determining Portion of Regulatory Burden on Indian Point 3 Capital & O&M Expenditures 1976 - 1986:10-Yr Cost Projection Also Included

ML20024B306
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point, 05000000
Issue date:	04/30/1983
From:	POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:
Shared Package
ML20024B287	List: ML20024B301 ML20024B303 ML20024B304 ML20024B306 ML20024B308 ML20024B310 ML20024B312 ML20024B314
References
NUDOCS 8307080341
Download: ML20024B306 (36)

Text

a

,).w... # :..._,, y -

' i' 9 7_.,.G.. 9....

" ~ *

. q..

a

~

t

._.,:t;..

m.

i..

7...

r...

~ '

g.;y

~.c.,7.,.

.),.

z.y. 8 k

• -. ~,-6

_,As s.

. ;, s.

n a

~

. PRODUCT

,. CONFIDENTIAL:.. ATTORNEY,.WO ~ DISTRIBUTION ONLY

+4, + <5 4 x

ar.J

-....t.";-

-?.-

,wt

.pi s.L *. *...

..n s

g, h G.'.a. - -

9 : r.g.n. +..,,

.,,,-(.,_ "FOR INTE

. ~;,

,4; T.*

u.:

r ;. g., g m a.- s~.u.s..-~ -- u.

*if;.,%,,y. n. p...

..:t ~

.(-w.8.-e. : -. -:.c.:. w... -...w.,;yn.:,.z,

+

, 7w....m,.,...---.,

3, 2. m..e,3._. -.

.q.,...

_...i

~

+ - :. w.v.

,--s.-

,.......s

.,.....___,...,u...

... c.

"' DETERMINING THE PORTION OF REGULATORY BURDEN ON INDIAN POINT UNIT 3 CAPITAL AND O&M EXPENDITUPIS 1976 - 1986 n..

w- ~;.

...:2 ALSO INCLUDED--

I'[

.. --TEN-YEAR COST PROJECTION N-

.x _.

.n~s, 1

- 3.'.

3.

BUDGET DIVISION APRIL, 1983

/(

i l

8307000341 830622 l

PDR REVGP IWIGREC PDR

CONTENTS _

.1 INTRODUCTION.

.y

.2 BRIEF HISTORY

SUMMARY

OF TABLES I - XIII (BACKGROUND & FINDINGS

.-4

.8 PERS0XNEL STAFFING - INDIAN POINT 3 TABLE I

.9 I-A MANAGEMENT STAFFING BY SECTION 10 I-B UNION STAFFING BY SECTION 11 I-C PASNY PAYROLL COSTS - INDIAN POINT 3.

12 HISTORICAL O&M COSTS - IP-3 II 13 HISTORICAL CAPITAL COSTS - IP-3 III EXTRAORDINARY REGULATORY (OTHER THAN TMI)14 IV OEM EXPENDITURES - IP-3 1977 - 1982 15 1977 - 1982 IV-A ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS -

EXTRAORDINARY REGULATORY (OTHER THAN THI) 16 1977 - 1982 V

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - IP-3 1979 - 1982 17

7..:. -

TMI LESSONS LEARNED BACKFITTING - IP-3

\\-

VI EXTRAORDINARY REGULATORY O&M PROJECTIONS 18 VII IP-3 1983 - 1986 EXTRAORDINARY REGULATORY CAPITAL PROJECTIONS 19 VIII IP-3 1983 - 1986 CURRENT & FUTURE IP-3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ 20 IX 1983 - 1990 PRUDENT PLANT OPERATIONS 21 1977 - 1986 REGULATORY BURDEN - OEM X

22 XI O&M FORECAST 1983 - 1993.

23 1977 - 1986.

REGULATORY BURDEN - CAPITAL XII.

24

. XIII CAPITAL FORCAST 1983 1993 25 APPENDIX A - NOTES 26.

s APPENDIX B - NRC LICENSING ACTION 30 APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION CAPACITY FACTORS IP-3 31 APPENDIX D - MAJOR OUTAGES l

O.

INTRODUCTION:

This report documents a first attempt to trace and estimate the principal monetary costs of regulatory burden as a percentage (O&M) expenditures of total Capital and Operating and Maintenance (IP-3) nuclear for the Power Authority's Indian Point Unit 3 Regulatory burden takes the form of NuclearI&E Bulletins generating plant.

Regulatory Commission Generic Letters,(see Appendix B), but can also inclu It is other federal-and state-level regulatory agencies.

NRC Orders important to note that the ten-year costs developed in this report are the result of the Power Authority's compliance with existing regulation since acquiring IP-3 from Co,nsolidated Edison in No monetary 1975 and then projected to December, 1986.

determinations have been made for anticipated regulatory burden

December,

~daat has yet to take the form of an official federal or state Therefore, estimates are subject to revision as current orders are modified'and as new information becomes available.

mandate.

The purpose of this study is to develop a realistic ten-year (with and without of total IP-3 Capital forecast (1983 - 1993) and site-related O&M expenditures.

replacement of steam generators)

Specifically, the analytic problem is to quantify all non-recurring regulatory expenses and unusual costs with respec (some of which are documented in the Settlement Agreement between PASNY and Westinghouse Electric Corporation).

parts at IP-3 Through the use of cross section analysis, these fixed-value s

residuals can be disaggregated leaving costs that can be extrapo-These plus variables lated at an appropriate rate of inflation.for expected nonrecurrin mathematical model for analyzing the economics associated withIndian Poin One word of caution is in order.

After subtracting IP-3.

in operation for little over seven years. costs, because of abnormalities associa intial years' we are left with very few values to starting-up a nuclear plant, base a ten-year cost projection (hetercskedastic correction could alter statistical weighting to costs which have a higher the early data is excluded from analysis)..

All material used in constructing cost actuals and forecasts were obtained through interviews with and information providedsby in-house personnel and the Power Authority's independent engineer.

As with most historical analysis, data gathered from the early years of operation have a much lower degree of certainty than does the information from later years when the Authority assu record keeping procedures.

This report was prepared by Alan Jaffe, Financial Analyst-from Nancy Capital Budgets; with technical assistance r

Sunder Raj, Director-Project Engineering-PWR, and numerous individuals from the Authority's New York, White Plains, and Indian s_

IP-3, K.S.

i Point offices.

~

BRIEF HISTORY

^

Con Edison contracts with Westinghouse FEBRUARY 1969 to begin construction of Indian Point 3 in the Village of Buchanan, New (PWR) (subsequent rewriting of contract York in December 1971).

NRC grants Con Ed license to load fuel PASNY acquires DECEMBER 1975 (subcritical' testing).

IP-3 from Con Ed. Total project cost

$435 million.

Con Ed receives NRC Operating License.

APRIL 1976 Indian Point 3 begins Commercial Operation.

AUGUST 1976 NRC approves transfer of complete operating MARCH 1978 and other associated responsibility to the Authority.

License (No. DPR-64) expires August 13, 2009.

(.

NRC approves an increase in IP-3 net s

AUGUST 1978 rated output from 873 to 965 MW.

(UCS)

Union of Concerned Scientists SEPTEMBER 1979 file a petition with the NRC to suspend (as well as IP-2) until operation of IP-3 the potentials for a severe accident can be determined.

NRC Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FEBRUARY 1980 allows IP-J (and IP-2) to continue.

operations.

(Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286)

NRC orders

'MAY 1980 adjudication of issues raised by UCS and others.

]

+

9 4

s

Brief History Cont.

~.

NRC unanimously decides to permit the JULY 1980 Indian Point units to remain open during the adjudicatory proceedings.

NRC appoints a three-member board SEPTEMBER 1981 (Atomic Safety and Licensing Board - ASLB) to conduct public safety hearings on the Indian Point units.

ASLB temporarily suspends filing schedule JULY 1982

& hearings subsequent to NRC orders.

Filing of testimony to NRC Ouestion #6 APRIL 1983 economic costs of Indian Point re:

nuclear generating station shutdown.

f

(.

a e

~^

- - - ~ - ~ _. _ _ __ _ _

(INDIAN POINT 3 PERSONNEL STAFFING & COSTS) 4 TABLES I, I-R, I-B, I-C BACKGROUND:

There are currently over 400 on-site personnel at Indian (exempt) employees.

This Point 3, of which 30% are management figure includes the many Consolidated Edison workers who continued their responsibilit'ies when the Authority assumed ownership of Their labor and benefit expenses the plant in December, 1975.

were paid through an operating agreement with Con Edison until May 2,19 82 when retained employees became PASNY union (non-1 exempt) personnel.

Prior to September, 1980, outside contractors provided After this date, PASNY instituted security services for IP-3.its own in-house staff to meet NRC requirements Currently, there are over 70 non-security system upgrading.

exempt security personnel, a number that has remained f airly constant from 1980 to present.

FINDINGS:

In large part due to additional requirements mandated by NRC orders on plant staffing and upgrading since the Three Mile l

there was a need to substantially increase As Table Island incident, on-site personnel in the years following March,1979.the more than e=ployees, plus the addition of 69 non-exempt security people, I indicates, brought > total on-site staff at Indian Point 3 for 1980 up to 327, l'~

an increase of over 90% from 1979 levels.

as shown in Table Correspondingly, payroll costs in 1980, rose approximately 50% in 1980 to $8.8 million beforeThe full cos I-C, adjusting for inflation.

and more than half of additional new management personne 1981, 53% above 1980 and September, 1980) in the $13.5 million payroll expense in 229% Coove 1979 before adjusting for inflation.

(INDIAN POINT 3 HISTORICAL O&M AND CAPITAL COS

. TABLES II, III BACKGROUND:

(O&M) costs PASNY historical Operating and Maintenance for IP-3 represent production expenses as reported in the Annual These figures Report of Public Electric Utilities DOE form EIA-412.

tne sum total of nuclear power generation accounts as recorded in the Uniform Systems of' Accounts Prescribed for Public represent Given this Utilities and Licensees minus fuel allocations.non-capitalizable expenses pe operating agreement with Con Edison are not fully reflected in the definition of O&M, l

l

/

figures shown in Table II.

i l

~ - - -

. -.=

l (INDI AN POINT 3 PERSONNEL STAFFING & COSTS) 3 TABLES I, I-A, I-B, I-C

f l

I t-BACKGROUND _:

4 There are currently over 400 on-site personnel at Indian (exempt) employees.

This Point 3, of which 30% are management figure includes the many Consolidated Edison workers who continued J

their responsibilities when the Authority assumed ownership of Their labor and benefit expenses the plant in December, 1975.

were paid through an operating agreement with Con Edison until May 2,1982 when retained employees became PASNY union (non-exempt) personnel.

y Prior to September, 1980, outside contractors provided 1

After this date, PASNY instituted security services for IP-3.its own in-house staf f to meet NRC requirements r Currently, there are over 70 non-l security system upgrading.

exempt security personnel, a number that has remained fairly l

constant from 1980 to present.

?

?

~ FINDINGS:

In large part due to additional requirements mandated by NRC orders on plant staffing and upgrading since the Three Mile there was a need to substantially increase As Table Island incident, on-site personnel in the years following March, 1979.

I indi~ cates, the more than 50% jump in both union and management c

employees, plus the addition of 69 non-exempt security people $27,

\\ ~

1 brought total on-site staff at Indian Point 3 for 1980 up to I

an increase of over 90% from 1979 levels.

Correspondingly, payroll costs in 1980, as shown in Table rose approximately 50% in 1980 to $8.8 million before(in-house security I-C, The full cost of these adjusting for inflation.and more than half of additional new management perso and other additional employees is fully reflected September, 1980) 1981, 53% above 1980 and in the $13.5 million payroll expense in 1

229% above 1979 before adjusting for inflation.

(INDIAN POINT 3 HISTORICAL O&M AND CAPITAL COSTS TABLES II, III I

BACKGROUND:

(O&M) costs PASNY historical Operating and Ma'intenance for IP-3 represent production expenses as reported in the Annual i

These figures Report of Public Electric Utilities DOE form EIA-412.

l the sum total of nuclear power generation accounts as recorded in the Uniform Systems of Accounts Prescribed for Public-represent Given this Utilities and Licensees minus fuel allocations.non-capitalizable expenses 4

definition of OEM, operating agreement with Ccn Edison are not fully reflected in the

(

figures shown in Table II.

l

. = _, _

' o i

Historical Capital costs represent net yearly increases in of combined electric plant in service and construction work

(~

Capital projects performed for the Authority by con Edison are fully included in the figures shown on Table III.

progress.

FINDINGS:

In the early years of IP-3 plant operation, payments to con Edison were a sizable portion of total plant expenses;be therefore, OEM defined as prcduction costs may appear to Operating severely understated in the years 1976 through 1978.

l agreement payments are expected to be a smaller portion of tota f

OEM expenses in 1983 than in previous years due to the trans er of Con Edison retained employees to PASNY non-exempt personnel 1

in May, 1982.

i OEM expenses since Three Mile Island rise far above the rate of inflation in the years 1979 to 1982 following theReasons for this increa experience of other nuclear units.

IV-A, and include additional regulation, as shown in Tables IV,as well In addition, there were various unusual outage related expenses VI, due to steam generator repairs and sleeving, replacement of(see Appendix D reactor coolant pump stators, and turbine repairs Net historical Capital costs fluctuate more narrowly th r

and VIII indicate, beginning in 1981 and is expected toExaminati do O&M expenses.

.', ('

V, VI, continue rising through 1985.

historical capital costs indicates that some major projects which were regulatory related were extraordinary and would not be In addition to regulatory occur in the future.

there were a few significant capital acquisitions such as expected to

burden, the purchase of two spare spindles.

VII, VIII, IX (PASNY EXTRAORDINARY REGULA-TABLES IV, IV-A, V,.VI, TORY O&M AND CAPITAL COSTS-HISTORICALS AND. PROJECT BACKGROUND:

Three primary sources--former and present IP-3 personnel, accounting records, and the Gilbert / Commonwealth-Independent Improvements Engineers Report on Capital Projects and Nuclear Plant TDraf t-1983 Edition)-- were consulted for the compilation of regulatory costs and projections listed in Tables IV - IX.

Regulatory burden incurred in the early years of plant operation bles that was handled by Con Edison is not fully reflected.in operation have a much lower degree of certainty than does more here.

recent information when the Authority assumed ev In addition, projected regulatory and prudent plant costs may

(.

change as current requirements are modified and when the final Gilbert / Commonwealth report is completed.

i

_ _ _ _ - _ FINDINGS:

(

The total cost of O&M regulatory burden at IP-3 for the years 1977 - 1982 is $40.9 million (not including additions to16% of total t

figures include personnel), about Some of the more significant-07, -14), various -

to S256.0 million.

safety-related piping (I.E.Bulletins 79-02, environmental studies and biological monitoring per the Hudsonso-called shor River Settlement agreement, (see Table VI), probabilistic risk assessment and USC hearingOp from 1983 - 1986 total $18.8 million, about 7% of the $269.1 support expenses.

Significant million total O&M for those years in unadjusted dollars.

expenses include seismic and dynamic qualifications of plant and various equipment, qualification of mechanical equipment,It is important to note that no on-going environmental expenses.

monetary determinations have been made for anticipated regulatory burden that has yet to take the form of an of ficial federal or state mandate.

1977 - 1982 was Regulatory Capital burden for the years

$39.0 million, about 26% of the $150.6 million total net Capital Significant costs include costs since IP-3 became operational.

security system upgrading and building, liquid radwater storagefire prote facility upgrading, long-term TMI modifications (see Table VI).

Capital regulatory 1983 - 1986, about projections total S75.7 million for the years 33% of total Capital costs without replacement of steam generators Major capital additions include and about 25% with replacement. costs, long-term TMI modifications, t

EPA-cooling tower settlementinterim radwaste storage building, and post accident mo systems (Reg Guide 1.97).

Current and future Indian Point 3 Capital improvement The prudent plant projects have been identified in Table IX.

most costly item is the possible replacement of 1-4 steam The steam generators at IP-3 have experiencedresulted in tube de generators.

corrosion which has Currently a $33.6 million program is underway to extend the life some of the generators and assess the full ef fect of the existingthe possibil corrosion, however, and may occur in the late 1980's.

(PERCENTAGE OF REGULATION TO TOTAL O&M AND TABLES X, XI, XII, XIII C]APITAL COSTS, TEN-YEAR O&M AND CAPITAL COSTS PROJECT BACKGROUND:

Few would argue that there is considerable uncertainty i

with respect to the future behavior of the variables that compr se In this analysis major O&M and Capital costs at Indian Point 3.have been disaggregated, namely, transfers, components of O&M expenseregulatory burden, Consolidated Edison operating ag

PASNY personnel costs, and unusual costs resulting in forced

[

a suitable starting point from which future escalation can be outages.

g It is important to note that while total O&M costs have historically risen far above inflation, the " co extrapolated.

quite flat after 1980.*

Capital projections, on the other hand, are the aggregate (with and of individual projects outlined in Tables VIII and IXThe bulk of this analysis without replacement of steam generators).was performed by th ified based on interviews with in-house personnel.

FINDINGS:

O&M costs are, expected to fall about 17% in 1983 to S68.7 million as the bulk of the sleeving and girth weld repairs are should fall another 10% from 1983 completed.

In 1984, O&M levels to $61.6 million as the cost related to the prer ant outageFor the following ye is over.

(scheduled to end June 1, 1983)is projected to remain flat as Con Edison ope costs further diminish with the completion of an Authorityrad (1985 - 1986) liquid In 1987, O&M may increase due to various steam generator repairs, and after that a simple inflationary increase of 7% is decreases.

forecast.

(

Capital costs follow no specific trend and are heavily influenced by the possibility of a $210.0 million steam generatorIn 1984, howev replacement over the next 5 - 7 years.

costs are expected to rise due to additions regarding the EPA-moder cooling tower settlement, moisture separater reheaters, main condenser, feedwater heaters,Th and condensate polisher.

keep projections high through 1985.

• It should be noted that " core" O&M expenses rise significantlyReasons may i from 1978-79 (Pre-TMI) to 1980 (Post-TMI).

(see Appendix the significant number of additional outages in 1980 the addition of materials and spare parts, and the step-up of routine maintenance activities brought about by the increased D),

s' number of forced outages.

-g-TABLE I_

PERSONNEL STAFFING _

[e INDIAN POINT 3_

.A+B C

A+B+C A

B MGMT.

TOTAL _

YEAR (1)

WION(

SECURITY'(UNION) 0 0

0 1975 0

0 23 23 1976 0

64 56 120 1977 64 105 60 165 1978 105 108 63 171 1979 108 229 98 327 69 19,80 160 256 104 360 75 1981 181 283 115 398 76 1982 207 282 122 404 l

73 1983(')

209 l

i s

(1)

As of December 31.

Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO.

t (2)

(Separate Contract).

Utility Workers Union of AmericaContract with Pinkerton Services and G I

(3) prior to September 1980.

(4)

As of March 9, 1983.

Figures do not include support staff at the Site employees only.

Authority's New York or White Plains offices.

S 0

m

TABLI I-A MANAGEMENT STAFFING BY SECTION s

INDIAN POINT 3 YEAR SECTION 1983_(2) 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981_

1982 3

3 3

3 5

6 6

6 ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SERVICES ( I 2

14 15 4

4 4

3 3

I O

O O

1 1

1 0

0 WAREHOUSE II O

O O

4 5

4 0

0 PURCHASING 0

0 0

2 4

4 0

0 ACCOUNTING (

O O

O 2

2 2

3 3

PERSONNEL O

O O

O O

O 12 14 FINANCE 2

9 10 9

13 13 12 12 MAINTENANCE 9

10 10 8

11 9

10 12 OPERATIONS

,- '(

RAD./ENV. SERVICES 1

5 5

5 10 13 14 15 3

5 5

5 6

6 7

INSTRUMENTATION & CNTRL. 0 6

10 9

13 21 25 25 25 TECHNICAL SERVICES 0

1 2

4 12 13 17 17 SECURITY & SAFETY 0

1 1

3 5

4 7

8 TRAINING TOTAL 23 56 60 63 98 104 115 122 (1)

As of December 31.

1983.

As of March 9, (2)

Prior to 1979 Warehouse, Purchasing, Accounting, and PersonnelFrom (3) were included under Office Services.

sections were recorded separately.

Mid-1982 Finance Department created and included Warehouse, (4)

Purchasing, and Accounting.

Figures do not include support staff at the Site employees only.

Authority's New York or White Plains offices.

. TABLE I-B

(

UNION STAFFING BY SECTION INDIAN POINT 3 YEAR (

SECTION 1983(2) 1978_

1979 1980 1981 1982 1977 1

6 7

8 15 15 16 18 OFFICE SERVICES /

FINANCE 3

4 4

7 9

9 10 WAREHOUSE 8

24 26 42 44 51 53 MAINTENANCE 18 23 25 44 45 46 44 OPERATIONS RAD./ENV. SERVICES 7

17 17 17 28 42 42 INSTRUMENTATION & CNTRL. 8 11 18 19 25 31 31 3

7 6

8 9

7 7

f'

\\~.

TECHNICAL SERVICES SECURITY & SAFETY l

1 1

70 76 78 75 1

2 2

2 2

1 0

TRAINING I4}

9 9

1 5

3 2

2 OTHER TOTAL 64 105 108 229 256 283 282 (1) As of December 31.

(2) As of March 9, 19 83.

Including Security (Union) after September, 1980.

(3) Unidentified employees or those contracted through Con Edison (4) that are unidentified.

Figures do not include support staff'at the Site employees only.

Authority's New York or White Plains offices.

(

-+-

w

+

-er y

+

a v

I TABLE I-C l (.

PASNY PAYROLL COSTS _

~

f4 INDIAN POINT 3 I

'. l,

($ in millions)

C+D A+B MGMT'

- A+B+C+D D

B UNION C

BENEFITS (3) TOTAL TOTAL A

I BENEFITS ( ) TOTAL MGMT YEAR (1) UNION 0.1

,0,1 0.1 1976

• 0.1 1.3 0.2

~ 1. 5 1.6 1977

• 0.1 1978 2.1 0.7 2.8 1.6 0.2 1.8 4.6 1979 2.6 0.9 3.5 2.0 0.4 2.4 5.9 1980 3.6 1.2 4.8 3.3 0.7 4.0 8.8 1981 5.3 1.7 7.0 5.3 1.2 6.5 13.5 1982 7.4 1.9 9.3 5.8

- 1.3 7.1 16.4 1.3 3.4 1983(')

1.7 0.4 2.1 l'.1 0.2 I

• Payroll costs paid to Con Edison may not be fullf~refl'ected in 1976 and 1977 figures.

(1)

As of December 31.

Edison until May 2, 1982; PASNY HOURLY I

(2)

Operating agreement with Con PERSONNEL thereaf ter.

Pension, Insurance, e t e'....

(3)

Estimated benefits include FICA, (4)

As of March 9, 1983.

Site employees only.

Figures do not inclu'de support staff at the Authority's New York or White Plains Offices.

h 9

~

r e

N

~

_______m__m.___

j v

s TABL2 II, t.

s p.

PASNdiHISTORICAL O&M COSTS (1)

'~~

INDIAN POINT 3 s.

s.i

a, l

COST YEAR

\\

$ in millions

' 1976'

$ 2.5 1977 12.7 1978 23.3 1

-1979 28.9 1,

1980 50.4 1981 58.2 1982 82.5 s

e-(1) Based' on ' DOE Form IIA-412_.

OEM costs do not include. indirect and fuel allocations.

Non-yapitalizable e'xpenses per the Authority's operating agreement with Consolidated Edison are not fully reflected

_ Ps in the'yfigurds above.

v..

s

~

1

\\-

\\

=

s f

e aum N

h

= 13 -~

(

I TABLE III PASNY HISTORICAL CAPITAL COSTS (1)

INDIAN POINT-3 9

COST YEAR S in millions

$434.8 1976 26.3 1977 14.7 1978 29.7 1979 30.0 1980 34.4

' (

1981 15.5 1982 III

$585.4 Total Capital Ex-penditures as of December 31, 1982 Consisting of:

Electric Plant in

$535.7 Service Construction Work 49.7 in Progress

$585.4 Does not include cost of IP-3 nuclear fuel which as of (1) December 31, 1982 amounted to $94.4 million:

$38.6 Unamortized cost of fuel in reactor Reload 3 - ready to go into reactor 55.8 during next refueling

$94.4 4

TA*LE EV PASNY EXTRAC22] NARY REGULATORY (OTHER THAN TMI)III OFERATING AND MAINTENANCE EIPENDITURES INDIAN POINT 3 1977-1982 (4 in millions)

TOTAL COST 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 TASE 5/27/75 0.2 MAIN STEAM 180l4ATION VALVES (NRC 18tFO. PEQUEST 14-02s 0.2 1.3 1.3 2.8 3.1 0.2 0.4 LETTTR)

BCS OVERPRESSURATION SYSTEM (NBC DEQUEST)(I.E. BUL. 79-02,-07 -14) 0.4 0.2 6.0 SAFETY RELATTD PIPING - MANGER NOD.

0.7 UPCRADE MASONRY NALLS (I.E. SUL. 80-11)AUDISILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR EVACUAT 0.2 79-18) 02 0.5 1.0 DEGRADED GRID VOLTAGE STUDY (NBC 6/3/77 LETTER)EWIRONMENTAL QUA 1.5

0.1 79-018

WUREG-0508) 11,1980 (INTERIM ACTIONS) 0.1 0.1 CONFIRMATORY ORDERS OF PEBRUARYNESTINGHOUSE VENOOR ASSICNMENT (NUCLEAR STEAM SUPP

)

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 METEROthGICAL TOWER BACRUP PONER ESP SLS9P EVALUATION, COIMPREGNATION OF FILTERS 10 CFR 50. 71-EI) 0.6 0.6 0.6-0.6 0.6 0.6 12.2

2. 4 2.3 2.9 3.0 0.8 0.8 FSAR UPDATE (FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI 3.0 0.1 0.9 SEISMOLOGICAL STUDIgg(2)

I3I 0.1 0.1 EWIRONMENTAL STUDIES & SIOIDGICAL MONITORINC 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 SYSTEMS INTERACTION STUDY (LICENSING CONDITION)

]

CONTROL OF REAVY 1AADS (NUREG 06121 7/31/80 LETTED) 0.4 0.2 i

5.5 0.3 APPENOIE R STUDY (10 CFR 50)

ANGLE SCREENS STUDY (EPA-COOLING TONES SETTLEMENT) 5.5 2.5 0.9 2/11/803 SUPPORT FOR UCS 0.1 UCS NEARING SUPPORT PDOBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (CC,tur. ORDER 3.4 0.1 0.8 0.8 CASE)

LETTER) 1.6 CONTAIDSIENT PURCE EVALUAT1006 (NBC 11/28/78(AS PER NBC IRSPECTION OF IP-2)l4)

DRANING UPDATE PROGRAM a.2 1.1 7.1 7.7 s.a 11.3 s is.e TOTAL - 06n sAcar1TTING 7.3 14.4 22.1 27.5 sit.e CIsUtAttvE torAL NOTESs As Or Dec 31 (1) SEE TAetE vt 1981); NUDSON RIVER SETTLEMENT ACREEMtWT (THEREAFTER)

(UNTIL MAY, (2) Wrc EWIRONNENTAL TECHNICAI. SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS t

(3) SEE taste IV-A (4) StCOMES CAPITAL ITEM AFTER 1981

(#

l TABLE IV-A Environmental Programs Estimated S in Hillion 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 b

Meteorological 0.06" 0.06 0.07 0.16 0.2 0.2 Monitoring Backup Tower 0.1 Backup Power 6

MIDAS Systems 0.2 0.05 0.05 c

Software 2.3

.2. 2 2.8 2.6 0.5 0.5 Biological Monitoring i

.17 Angled Screens Con Ed was handling the contract for Meteorological flonitoring Prior to 1978, so we have no records of actual expenditures.

a.

at the entire site, The' increased expenditure is the result of compliance with NRC confirmatory b.

order of February, 1980, and NRC NUREG - 0654.

The funds for this item might have come from other than environmental studies.

c.

e

/

y

~

~16-TADLE V pasty EXTRActDIliARY REGULATORY (DTHER TilAN TNI)III CAPITAL EXPINDITUR13 JNCIAN ECINT 3 1977-1982 is in millional TOTAL Coilf 1977 1973 1979 1980 1981 1982 TASE 3.0 2.9 0.1 l2) 0.1 0.5 0.2 SPENT PUEL RACES - NIGN DENSITY (NBC UNRESOLVED SAFETY 2.0 1.2 FIPR RFSTR 4ttrTS FOR ASYMETRIC VESSEL 1 DADS 4.0 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.5 ISSUE A-21 0.2 SECURITY SYSTEM UPGAADING & BUILDING 110 CPR 50)11, 1980 (INTERIN ACTIONS) 0.2 0.1 CONPIBMA10Ry ORDERS OF PER 0.1 0.1 0.2 A1WS - ANf1CIPATED TRANSIENTS W/O SCRAN 0.3 0.2 HUMAN PACTORS STUDY 0.3 A2WS IMPROVEMENT - NISSILE SNIELD 0.5 2.3 2.3 4.6 0.2 0'.3 IDW PIEW BYPASS SYSTEM 0.1 0.1 LIQUID RADNATER 61CRAGE PACILITY UPGRADE (AS PER NBC INSPECTION OF IP-21 I3) 0.5 0.1 o.3 0.1 DRAWING UPDATE PROGRAN CNARGING PUNP SECTION STABILIIERS & DISCNARGE DANPTNEAg 0.1 SEISNIC QUAL - AUE PEETWATER SYSTEN (NRC GENERIC LETTEM 81-10.0 3.0 1.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 C

POS. 9.5.1)

I 25 a.5 3.4 2.2 3.7 4.0

_25.6 2

10TAL - CAPITAL-BAC5 PITTING 12.0 14.2 17.9 22.7 m25.8 i

CUNUtAT1vE TorAL NOTESs AS OF DBC 31 (1) SPE TABLE fl AL OH-SITE STORAGE SPACE.

INCLUDES 1976 - GOVERWlENT POLICY REQUIRED THE NEED FOR ADDITION (2)

(3) 06N ITEN BEFORE 1981 e

l

=

i kw y

\\

T*,ILE VI 1].

TMI LESSONS LEADMED SACEFITT!!C INnIAN POINT 3 1979-1962

($ in millions)

UPTAL mST 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 TASE 1.1 III 1.1 0.2 0.2 TMI NODIFICATIOMI SESEARCN 880RT TERN (NUBEG-0578) 0.4 0.4 0.2 06N -

(NUSEC-0578)

ELECTIC POWEB & DESEARCN INST. STUDY-TMI a.6 EMIGENCY PREPAREDNESS STUDY INUREG-0654) 0.6 0,i I.1

$7.I TorAL 06N 3.5 7.8 CAPITAL -

11.3 TMI NODIFICATIONS - IANG TERN (NUREG-0578 -0737)(2) 0.5 0.1 ENERGENCY PDEPA8EDNESS WODIFICATION lNUREC-0654I-8.6 0.1 1.4 CUIDE 1.23) 1.5 PUBLIC NorIFICATION SYSTEPl (NUREG 0654I GUIDE 1.23) 4.1 9.3 SI) 4 TOTAL CAPITAL NOTES:

AS OF DEC 31 (1) SHORT TEIW4 TML DEACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM SATURATION ALARN ACOUSTIC NOMITORING CONTAINNENT ISOI.ATION FACILITIES FOR STA PEADCTOR COOLANT SYSTEN POST ACCIDENT SAMPLING TECHNCIAL SUPPORT CEWrtS APW FIAN INDICAITON (2) IDNG 1ERN TMI CORTAlletENT ISOLATION DEPENDASILITY Cf*TAINNENT PARANETERS PLANT SHIELDING PEACTOR VESSEL NEAD VEWF SYSTENINSTRUNENTATIOtt FOR DETICTION OF INADEQUAT MICH DANGE RADIATION NONITORING INST 90NENTATOf CONTROL DOOM MARITABILITY ON-SITE TECHNCIAL SUPPORT CENTER TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER COMPUTER CONTROL DOON = DESIGN INPROVptENTS O

S l

TABLE VII PASNY EITPA09DINA9Y DEGULATORY III OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE PICIECTIONS INDIAN POIKT 3 1983-1986 (3 in m1111onE8 ESTIMATI g,g3 gges 1985 1986 TOTAL COST TA5B 0.3 0.3 79-18) 0.1 AUDIBILITY IMPPOVINENTS FOR EVACULATION ALARM (I.E. BUL 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.5 (1.E. BUL 79-018)

DEGRADED GRID VOLTAGE STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (INTEplM ACTIONS) 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 11, 1980 0.1 CONFIRMA10EY ORDERS OF FEBRUARY 0.1 4.1 0.1 1.0 1.5 1.5 NEETINGNOUSE VENDOR ASSIGNMENT ARCH /I3tG REPRESENTATIVE UEAC ($10,000 m 7 YEAps)

SEISMIC 6 DYNAMIC QUALIFICATIONS OF PLANT EQUIPMENT (2) EMERG AL 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 PROGRAM (NUREG-0696) 0.5 0.5 FSAR UPDATE (FINAL SAF'ETY ANALYSIS 9tEPORT) 1.3 1.3 0.1 ANGLE SCREENS STUDY 0.3 UCS HEARING SUFPORT 0.4 0.4 CX)MTAISENT PURGE EVALUATION I2) 1.0 1.0 4.1 0.1 1.0 E.5 1.5 DFAWING UPDATF PROGRAM SYSTutS INTERACTION STUDY l23 0.2 0.2 QUALIFICATION OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 0.2 0.2 ELECTRIC POWER 6 RESEARCH INST. STUDY - THI 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 INERGENCY PREPAREDNESS STUDr ENVIRO

• ENTAL STUDIES & BIOLOGICAL MONITORING 6.7 3.9 4.1 4.4 S_18.8 TOTAL = 06M PRGIECTIONS 10.1 14.4 SIS t CUMULATIVE TOTAL NOTES 8 AS OF DIC 31 (1) SEE APPENDIX A (2) AWAITING NBC FINAL CUIOEbIHE8 6

t I

k*

l

'O b

19 TAOLE VI!!

PASNY EITpAORDINARY REGULATORY III CAPITAL PROJECTIONS JMDIAN POINT 3 1983-1986

($ in millional ESTIMATE 1983 1984 1985 1906 TOTAL COff TASE (ENCIASED) (2)

[

25.0 1.5 76 10.0 5.9 INTARE STRUCTUht I-CIRCUIATING MATER PIMPS AND MOTORS l

2.1 0.2 09 1.0 5.3 1.1 3.1 1.1 ANCLE SC9EEN5 AWS - ANTICIPATED TRANSIENTS W/O SCRAM 12.7 6.2 3.2 3.3 REG GUIDE 1.97 - POST ACCIDENT MONITORING SYSTEM (NUBEG-0578 -0737) 3.2 1.2 1.2 0.8 10.5 0.2 1.7 8.6 3MI MODIFICATIONS - LONG TERM FINES FOR APPENDIE 3 to 10 CFR 50 INTERIM RADNASTE S10BAGE BUILDING 25 SUPPORT POR 0.5 1.0 1.0 PpOBASILISTIC WISE ASSCSSME3rf (CONF. ORDER 2/11/80I SAFETY 2.1 0.1 2.0 PIPE REST 9AINFS FOR ASYMETSIC VESSEL IAADS (NBC UNBESOLVED UCS CASE) 0.1

• 2.0 2.1 ISSUE A-2l R 81-14) 2.0 SEISMIC OuAL. - Aur FEEDWATER SYSTEM (NBC GENESIC LETTE 2.0 2.1 0.5 1.6 2.0 2.0 EMERCENCY PREPAREDNESS 4.0 SYST3 INTERACTION MODIFICATICM 0.1 0.1 SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADE 1.0 0.5 05 PRESSUSIRED TNESMAL SNOCR 1.'O 1.0 MAIN TURSINE MISSILE ANALYSIS PUBLIC N0tIFICATIOtt SYSTEM 15.2 26.a 27.s L9

_37_5.7 69.8 E

10TAL - CAPITAL FRCUECTS

&O_

l, CUMULATIVE TOTAL i

W ESS AS OF Dec 31 (1) REE APPENDIX A

12) EPA-COOLING TONER SETTLEMENT i

i

,I i

\\.m.

~20-TABil3 IE CURRDff 6 FUTURE INDIAN POINT 3 CAPITAL IMPROVIMENT PB(UECTS III 1983-1990 PRUDENT flANT OPERATIONS

($ in sillions)

ESTIMATE 1945 1984 1985 1984 1987 1988 1989 1990 TOTAL COST TASE 6.5 R.1 3.2 3.2 FUTURE SECURITY SUILDIW3 l33 3.8 3.6 0.2 MAJOR SPARE PARTS INCLUDINO SPAkt MAIN TRANSFORMER 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.4 LEALING EDGE FthW METE 8 833(AREA RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM) 7.1 2.1 5.0 0.1 REMOTE AFJi SYSTEM 0.1 BICH PRESSURE TURBINE MODIFICATION 0.5 0.5 CENERATOR STATOR MONITORING SYSTEM 1.8 1.8 2.1 3.1 1.1 FEEDWATER PLMP CowrROL SYSTEM I4I 6.3 REACTOR COOtANT PLMP AND MOTOR ILDING 0.2 4.9 1.8 MAJOR SPARES STORAGE SUIIDING AND/OR ADMINISTRATION BU 6.9 0.6 0.5 0.1 LIQUID RADWASTE PROCESSING FACILITY 10.5 0.5 4.1 5.3 STEAM CENERA10R MANWAY REMOVAL DEVICES 2.0 ELIX:TRICAL AUX 1LARY POWER DISTRIRUTION UPCRADE 2.0 18.9 1.1 8.4 9.4 210.0 1.1 9.4 31.5 31.5 68.2 68.3 STEAM CENERATOR 814WDOWN RECOVERY 80.6 12.0 19.7 16.0 13.1 11.3 2.5 6.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 15.8 15 0 WIM TRAINING /SIMUIATOR BUILDING STEAM CENERATOR REPLACMENT 15.8 0.5 2.1 2.6 5.3 5.3 35.0 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS (5) 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 NEW FUtt. STORACE BUILDING 3.0 5.0 8.0 12.0 15.0 17.0 VOLUME REDUCTION 0.3 0.1 0.2 ISOIATION VALVE 60.0 STEAM PURITY MON. SYSTEN III 24.3 64.2 78.0 62.0 91.8 8A.8 18.0 15.8 FUTURE NUCLEAR IMPROVEMENTS

$468.1 88.5 166.5 228.5 326.3 415.1 453.1 8468.1 TOTAL-PRUDENT FIANT CtMU!ATIVE TOTAL

>0TESs AS OF DOC 31 15.4/1981, 3.0/1982 TUR8INE REPAIRS - FURCNASS SWO SPARE SPINDLES 6/1942 (1) SEE APPENDIE Al2) MAJOR SPARE PARTS INCLUDING SPARE MA14 TRANSPORMER 0.

0.5/1981, 0.3/1982 (3) LEADING EDCE FI4W METER 0,7/1982 EATERS (4) REACTOR COOIAlfr PLMP AND MOFORINCLUDE8s MODERNIZATION 6 IMPTALLA?IOM OF SI (5)

MAIN CONDENSER FEEDNATER HEATERS 2.2/3901, 6.2/1982(MAY INCt.UDE PUTUht NFC REGUIATIONS)

CONDENSATE POLISHER (6) MOF IDENTIFIED SY INDEPENDENT ENGINEER'S REPORT g

i 0

~!

v

./

W p

b TABLE X REGULATORY BURDEN - O&M INDIAN POINT 3 1977 - 1986 (S in millions)

REGULATORY TOTAL O&M

% REGULATION O&M EXPENDITURES (

COSTS OF TOTAL COST YEAR 1977

$ 4.2 S12.7 33.1%

1978 3.1 23.3 13.3 I

1979 8.2 28.9 28.4 1980 7.7 50.4 15.3 1981 6.0 58.2 10.3 1982 11.7 82.5 14.1 1983 6.2 68.7 9.0

• (

1984 3.9 61.6 6.3 1985 4.3 69.5 6.2 1986 4.4 69.3 6.3 (1) 1977 - 1982 Actuals; 1983 - 1986 Projections in nominal dollars (2) Including TMI Lessons Learned Backfitting O&M costs do not include indirect and fuel allocations.

Non-capitalizable expenses per the Authority's operating agreement with Consolidated Edison are.not fully reflected in the figures above.

/

. TABLE XI

(

1-O&M FORECAST 1983 -1993 INDIAN POINT 3 f

FORECAST YEAR

$ in millions (nominal dollars)

$ 68.7 1983 61.6 i

1984 69.5 1985 69.3 l

-[

1986 N

77.7 l

1987 83.1 1988 -

89.0 1989 95.2 1990 10 1.8 1991 109.0 1992 116.6 1993 O&M costs do not include-indirect and fuel allocations.

Non-capitalizable expenses per the Authority's,. operating agreement with Consolidated Edison are not fully reflected in the figures above.

4 0

.-e++**

w

TABLE XII REGULATORY BURDEN - CAPITAL INDIAN POINT-3 1977-1986

($ in millions)

TOTAL CAPITAL

% REGULATION REGULATORY COSTS OF TOTAL COST CAPITAL EXPENDITURES YEAR 32.7%

$ 26.3 1977

$ 8.6 14.7 23.1 3.4 1978 29.7 7.4 2.2 1979 12.3 30.0 3.7 1980 25.9 8.9 34,4 1981 15.5 78.7 12.2

(.

1982 w/o Gen ( }

w/ Gen w/o Gen w/ Gen 38.4 39.5-39.6 38.5 15.2 1983 26.8 81.6 91.0 32.8 29.5 1984 27.8 74.3 105.8 37.4 26.3 1985 36.4 67.9 16.2 8.7 5.9 1986 l

l (1) 1977-1982 Actuals; 1983-1986 Proj ections in nominal dollars f

Including TMI Lessons Learned Backfitting (2) lf ections not including $210.0 Steam Generator Replacement r

\\s (3)

Proj/1983, 9.4/1984, 31.5/1985, 31.5/1986, 68.2/1987, 68.3/1988 1.1 J

l 1

l m

(.

F j

TABLE XIII CAPITAL FORECAST 1983-1993 INDIAN POINT 3 FORECAST.

YEAR

$ in millions (nominal dollars) w/o Gen.(1) w/ Gen.

S 38.4 S 39.5 1983 81.6 91.0 1984 74.3 105.8 1985 36.4 67.9 19,86 29.6 97.8 1987 20.5 88.8 1988 38.0 1989 15.0 1990 16.1 1991 17.2 1992 18.4 1993 Projections not including $210.0 Steam Generator Replacement -

1.1/1983, 9.4/1984, 31.5/1985, 31.5/1986, 68.2/1987, 68.3/1988 (1)

, f 1

. APPENDIX A and installation I

Estimated costs include engineering, material procurement, costs e i

and a 54 allowance for PASNY administrat,ive expenses.

Excluded are interest during construction and other financing costs.

Projections are subject to revision.

e f

c --

APPENDIX B

,(

GENERIC LETTERS j

2 1982 1

1978 1979 1980 1981 1977 4

28 56 58 40 27 1.

From 12/77.

Includes one supplement, one draft, and one letter never issued.

2.

I I&E DOCUMENTS 2

2 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 73 74 Bulletins 6

19 11 7

9 15 51 32 5

7 (16)

(8)'

(8) (14) (28) (25)

(3)

(4) 7 17 19 25 25 15 0

I Circulars s

s 38 45 40 52 Info. Notices (39)

(48)

Includes supplements and revisions, number in () incicates originals.

1.

2.

Issued as regulatory operations bulletins.

i REGULATORY GUIDES (Division 1)1 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 4

17 14 34 20 11 17 12 6

2 2

4 1

,l 1.

Original guide issued during calendar year.

f f

December 14, 1982

\\

4 Generic Letters, I & E Documents, etc. do not all necessarily apply to Indian Point 3 Pressurized Water Reactor.

... ~.

~

~

i APPENDIX B (COMT.)_

1 l

NUREGs 2

Periodicals 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 20 6

69 169 111 105 107 107 77 Totals include original issues and revisions (supplements not included);

1.

taken from LIS HUREG' Listing.

2.

Received by LIS through December 14, 1982.

~

'(

I TOTAL NURECs ISSUED (NUREG, CR, CP, BR) 1979 1980 1981 19822 949 1222 1107 532 Includes originals, revisions, and supplements.

Includes originals, revisions, and supplements of NUREGs, NUREG/C

'1.

2.

NUREG/ cps.

Generic Letters, NUREGs, etc. do not all necessarily apply to Indian Point 3 Pressurized Water Reactor.

(

December 14, 1982

. -. - =

APPENDIX B (CONT.)

NRC ORDERS h

k:

1 1978 28 Issued o 18 re:

ECCS Evaluation o

2 re:

Steam Generator Inspection o

3 re:

CP Extensions Power Supply to RPS, Limits on Operation, D/G Load Sequencing, o

l're:

Resumption of Hearing's, Control Building Repair 1.

3/28/78 - 12/31/78 1979 41 Issued o

5 re:

Show Cause - Seismii. Analysis

'h o

5 re:

B&W Modifications o 13 re:

CP Extensions Hearings (' Resumption of, Evidentiary, etc.)

o 12 re:

o 2 re:

Relief from ISI Indefinite Shutdown, Suspension of OL, EPICOR II, S/G Tube o

1 each re:

Hydrostatic Testing

1980, 88 Issued Show Cause on 0578 Category "A" Requirement.

o 31 re:

o 5 re:

Extends CP Date Installation of Recirculation Pump Trip o

T re:

o 17 re:

Hearings o

3 re: Monetary Penalty o

2 re: Modify Category "A" Order o

1 each re:

Various

(

December 14, 1982 Generic Letters, NRC Orders, etc. do not all necessarily apply to Indian Point 3 Pressurized Water Reactor.

APPENDIX B (CONT.)

NRC ORDERS (Cont'd) 1981 132 Issued o 47 re: TMI Commitments and Requirements o 13 re: Extends CP Date o

2 re:

Revokes CP o

5 re: Mark I Containment Modification o 32 re: Hearing o

8 rc: Monetary Penalty Surveillance of LC0 and PCS Isolation o 13 re: Modification of License re:

Valves BWR Scram Modifications (1 was to all BWRs) o 2 re:

o 1 each re: Various

/

s 1982 56 Issued o 12 re:

Extends CP Date Modification of Order Regarding Completion of Mark I o 22 re:

Modifications o

3 re:

Hearings o

9 re: Monetary Penalty Extends time for NRC to review ALAB-653 (Diablo Canyon) o 1 re:

o 5 re:

1.icensing Commitments l

Suspension of All Construction i

o 1 re:

o I re:

Seismic Upgrade o

1 each re: Various Generic Letters, NRC Orders, etc. do not all necessarily apply to Indian Point 3 Pressurized Water Reactor.

December 14, 1982

(~

APPENDIX C g

FACTORS.

PRODUCTION CAP ACITY INDIAN POINT 3_

f Time in Operation YEAR CUM.

YTD l

NA 65 1977 65 65 1978 63 57 1979 61 39 1980 57 39 1981 51 18 1982

(-

(Using Maximum Dependable (1)

Unit Capacity Factor Capacity Net) e

f APPENDIX D_

b MAJOR OUTAGES _

INDIAN POINT 3_

TOTAL DAYS YEAR ( )

OUTAGES _

9d 3

1977 93 3

1978 119 4

1979 8*

165 1980 144 5

1981 280 1

1982 1*

152 1983

.(-

s 108 days in 1979 and September 1979 - February 1980 outage:280 days in 1982 and (1)

March 1982 outage 42 days in 1980. (expected start-up June 1983).

152 days in 1983 (counted as one indicates outages occurring between years e

in each year).

e l

f'

\\

l l

i i

l APPENDIX D (CONT.)

Major Outages b

Indian Point - 3 ei Reason Date Dsys Began commercial. operation 8/30/76 Scheduled Turbine Outage 9/10/76-10/3/76 23 Scheduled Maintenance on Secondary 12/17/76-12/21/76 Side of ! Plant 5

Repair of 53 Loop Spray Valve 1/15/77-01/26/77 il Scheduled Repair of 31 Safety 4/05/77-04/12/77 Injection Pump and 31B Main Steam 7

Reheater j

Scheduled Turbine Outage, Warranty i

10/06/77-12/17/77 72 Inspection Repair of #33 Loop RTD Bypass 2/03/78-02/10/78 Manifold Hot Leg Stop Valve L~-

7 I

Scheduled Refueling Outage 6/07/78-08/25/78 f

79 Repair of 33 Steam Generator Tube l

12/07/78-12/14/78 7

Leak Repair :of 34 Steam Generator Tube 3/20/79-03/27/79 7

Lenk Transformer fault on B&C phase 8/08/79-08/09/79 bushing on 131 Main Transformer 1

High Cloride amounts in Steam 9/01/79-09/04/79 Generator due to Condensor Tube 3

Leaks Scheduled Refueling 9/14/79-02/11/80 150 QI)'

' ~ ~

APPENDIX D (CONT.)

~

~

Reason Date 8

DLys Turbine Balance 2/11/80-02/16/80 5

Main Boiler Feed Pump Lube Oil 3/05/80-03/'.3/80 System Clean up and Return to 8

Service circulating Water Pump Inspection, 4/06/80-04/19/80 Repair and Return to Service 13 Replacement of 31 Reactor Coolant i

7/15/80-07/30/80 Pump 6.9 KV Electrical Penetration

'i 15 Electrically Isolated Failed Unit 9/09/80-09/12/80 Auxiliary Transformer 3

~

Scheduled Turbine and Steam

'i 10/01/80-12/04/80 Generator Inspection Outage 64 1

Replacement of 33 Reactor Coolant 12/04/80-12/19/80 15 Pump Stator Repair Blade Damage in 31 Lov 1/31/81-04/01/81 Pressure Turbine 60 li Electrically Isolated" Failed 32 1

4/01/81-04/02/81 Main Transformer a

l 1

Scheduled Outage to Complete 9/03/81-09/24/81 Replacement of 32 Main Transformer 21 Repair of Tube Leak in 31 Steam 9/24/81-11/16/81 53 Generator 1

Replacement of 31 Reactor Coolant 11/23/81-12/02/81 Pump Stator 9

Refueling Outage 432 3/25/82-present (proj. 6/1/83) e i

w

~

g

.