ML21144A237

ES-301-4

ML21144A237
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	04/13/2021
From:	Gregory Roach Operations Branch III
To:	NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Roach G
Shared Package
ML20136A302	List: ML21144A234 ML21144A237 ML21144A238 ML21144A240 ML21144A244 ML21144A247 ML21144A250 ML21144A254 ML21144A258 ML21144A264 ML21144A268 ML21144A273
References
Download: ML21144A237 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: CPS Date of Exam: 3/29/2021 Scenario Numbers: 2 / 3 / 4 Operating Test No.:2021.301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c*

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, GMR but it does not cue the operators into expected events. f"I.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. /'1 .,.... GMR

3. Each event description consists of the following:

• the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

• the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event M

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew GMR

• the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• the event termination point (if applicable)

GMR

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. M  ?""

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. M ,- GMR

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. M GMR Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. M .,.... GMR

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional M GMR fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. 9-

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. M ,- GMR

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). JV'\ ,- GMR

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable GMR rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) M

?-

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified GMR on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). M

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentilied critical tasks across scenarios, when GMR possible. M

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. (vi ,- GMR Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes .. -- --

GMR

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1/ 1 / 1 /'I "r-

2. Abnormal events (2-4) GMR 4/ 4 /4 ("I  ?--

GMR

3. Major transients (1-2) 1 / 1 /1 f'I 9-

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/ 2 /1 GMR

.M 9-'

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions 1 per scenario 1 / 1 /1 M GMR set)  ?-

6. Preidentilied critical tasks 2) 2/ 2 /5 M  ?- GMR

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NAC*developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.