05000336/FIN-2012005-04: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
| identified by = NRC
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure =  
| Inspection procedure =  
| Inspector = M Patel, M Modes, B Haagensen, J Krafty, R Mckinley, J Nicholson, R Rolph, S Chaudhary, J Ambrosini, T Hedigan, D Lawyerb, Haagensen D, Orr E, Keighley J, Ambrosini J, Caruso J, Deboer J, Krafty M, Modes R, Bellamy R, Rolp
| Inspector = M Patel, M Modes, B Haagensen, J Krafty, R Mckinley, J Nicholson, R Rolph, S Chaudhary, J Ambrosini, T Hedigan, D Lawyerb, Haagensend Orr, E Keighley, J Ambrosini, J Caruso, J Deboer, J Krafty, M Modes, R Bellamy, R Rolph
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| INPO aspect =  
| INPO aspect =  
| description = On October 15, 2012, during walkdowns performed in response to the NRCs 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter while Unit 2 was shutdown in Mode 5, Dominion identified several unsealed electrical conduits connecting the SW pump room in the intake structure to the turbine building. During a design basis flood, this condition had the potential to cause flooding of the turbine building such that all auxiliary feedwater pumps could be rendered inoperable. Dominion has also identified other unsealed penetrations in the design basis flood zone. Dominion took prompt corrective actions to seal the identified penetrations. These deficiencies may have existed since initial construction. The inspectors determined that there was a performance deficiency in that Dominion did not ensure that the electrical conduits were sealed to provide adequate flood protection. Additional information is necessary for the inspectors to determine if the issue is more than minor. The information required is as follows: 1. Determine if the conduits that were not sealed at the Unit 2 flood boundary were sealed on the other end; 2 Determine the aggregate impact of potential flooding from all leak paths on the safety function of affected components. Upon receipt of the above information, the NRC will assess whether the performance deficiency is more than minor.
| description = On October 15, 2012, during walkdowns performed in response to the NRCs 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter while Unit 2 was shutdown in Mode 5, Dominion identified several unsealed electrical conduits connecting the SW pump room in the intake structure to the turbine building. During a design basis flood, this condition had the potential to cause flooding of the turbine building such that all auxiliary feedwater pumps could be rendered inoperable. Dominion has also identified other unsealed penetrations in the design basis flood zone. Dominion took prompt corrective actions to seal the identified penetrations. These deficiencies may have existed since initial construction. The inspectors determined that there was a performance deficiency in that Dominion did not ensure that the electrical conduits were sealed to provide adequate flood protection. Additional information is necessary for the inspectors to determine if the issue is more than minor. The information required is as follows: 1. Determine if the conduits that were not sealed at the Unit 2 flood boundary were sealed on the other end; 2 Determine the aggregate impact of potential flooding from all leak paths on the safety function of affected components. Upon receipt of the above information, the NRC will assess whether the performance deficiency is more than minor.
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 20:46, 20 February 2018

04
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Report IR 05000336/2012005 Section 4OA5
Date counted Dec 31, 2012 (2012Q4)
Type: URI:
cornerstone Mitigating Systems
Identified by: NRC identified
Inspection Procedure:
Inspectors (proximate) M Patel
M Modes
B Haagensen
J Krafty
R Mckinley
J Nicholson
R Rolph
S Chaudhary
J Ambrosini
T Hedigan
D Lawyerb
Haagensend Orr
E Keighley
J Ambrosini
J Caruso
J Deboer
J Krafty
M Modes
R Bellamy
R Rolph
INPO aspect
'