ML101720455: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:~k~ | ||
'jar'es.weindle tmail.thouse.gov'; | CO, u~u' fts po::t, St-rc u tr:r F t~r tin tO j | ||
'Joies, Keon rfAprops)'; | Related PRpiýP~ply .Foroard DeleteMoet reotA Otlier Etock atE'aori Foto'atow Cr~ M~asL From: Powellt Amy Sent: ton3!29/2010 4:05 PH1 To: Powell, Amy Bcc; 'pere.modaff'rmail.house.goov; 'jar'es.weindle tmail.thouse.gov'; 'Joies, Keon rfAprops)'; Blair,Rob'%Doug_Clapptapprosenatngov': 'CarrieApostotou",Spener, Peter:; | ||
Blair, Rob'% Doug_Clapptapprosenatngov': | 'Caouto, Annie E*VP):;'Dedrick,Kathy(ENW)','Bscont, G'Uia(Carpe'); iHaynes, Laura (Carper)', 'Freedhoff, 'Nfihar; 'Mattheows. | ||
' | Kate': 'Sprig, Andrea'; lieumar, Mary:'Ba'an, Jef; | ||
iHaynes, Laura (Carper)', 'Freedhoff, 'Nfihar; 'Mattheows. | 'Cherry, Davi*';'McDonoug',Alexandor (ei'; 'Crstzio, Dayle(Reid' 'Story, Tod' 'greg~facchano-ufniiLhouse,go,'u' 'iohnmmn~engr.senate,gov' 'mact rmo ii~hc,.co'; | ||
Kate': 'Sprig, Andrea'; lieumar, Mary: 'Ba'an, Jef;'Cherry, 'McDonoug', Alexandor (ei'; 'Crstzio, Dayle (Reid' 'Story, Tod' 'greg~facchano-ufniiLhouse,go,'u' | '5hav, Andrew(Ensign)'; 'Consoivo, Brandon fnrrign)'; 'Shannon.Raborn.*reidlsen.tegon'; 'Agostsi, Karen':'Follum"es, Sam(Energy)'; 'tsyotene~energs.renacegov': | ||
'iohnmmn~ | ij | ||
engr.senate,gov' | |||
'mact rmo ii~hc,.co'; | |||
'5hav, Andrew (Ensign)'; | |||
'Consoivo, Brandon fnrrign)'; | |||
'Agostsi, Karen': 'Follum"es, Sam (Energy)'; | |||
'tsyotene~energs.renacegov': | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
DOE, Eureka Countpyfile responses to petitions to intervene | DOE,Eureka Countpyfile responses to petitions to intervene aai32.1'0 Ansserof USDeptof Energyi Ipdfp(35KBI At Hi again-As I mentioned ina previous e-mail (March 8.2010), parties currently inthe hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from W01A, SC. and Aiken County, SO. Attached isthe full response filed by the DOE. which isinclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). Inshort, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law inthis issue inthis unique proceeding" (p 2 of the attached). | ||
Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that | Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that ittakes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too was inclusive of all five petitioners). Ifanyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing. please let me know I will forvard other responses filed as i receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, VA. SC, and Aiken Count')' will have until April 5th to reply to these responses. | ||
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs | |||
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone 301-415-1673 | 'ii Phone 301-415-1673 | ||
'ttIII:12.Mie iOft 0#iceo.0_ ovIM -Ntioi 00.NRDocue t l :tMu sotY>1 I)ýhihlq3 | |||
I,. | |||
Powell, Amy From: Powell, Amy Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:05 PM To: Powell, Amy | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
DOE, Eureka County file responses to petitions to intervene Attachments: | DOE, Eureka County file responses to petitions to intervene Attachments: 3-29-10 Answer of US Dept of Energy[1].pdf Hi again - | ||
3-29-10 Answer of US Dept of Energy[1].pdf Hi again -As I mentioned in a previous e-mail (March 8, 2010), parties currently in the hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from WA, SC, and Aiken County, SC. Attached is the full response filed by the DOE, which is inclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). In short, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law in this issue in this unique proceeding" (p. 2 of the attached). | As I mentioned in a previous e-mail (March 8, 2010), parties currently in the hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from WA, SC, and Aiken County, SC. Attached is the full response filed by the DOE, which is inclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). In short, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law in this issue in this unique proceeding" (p. 2 of the attached). | ||
Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that it takes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too, was inclusive of all five petitioners). | Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that it takes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too, was inclusive of all five petitioners). If anyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing, please let me know. | ||
If anyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing, please let me know.I will forward other responses filed as I receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, WA, SC, and Aiken County will have until April 5th to reply to these responses. | I will forward other responses filed as I receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, WA, SC, and Aiken County will have until April 5th to reply to these responses. | ||
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1}} | Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1}} |
Latest revision as of 17:53, 13 November 2019
ML101720455 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Prairie Island, 06300001 ![]() |
Issue date: | 03/29/2010 |
From: | Amy Powell Office of Congressional Affairs |
To: | Amy Powell Office of Congressional Affairs |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2010-0199 | |
Download: ML101720455 (2) | |
Text
~k~
CO, u~u' fts po::t, St-rc u tr:r F t~r tin tO j
Related PRpiýP~ply .Foroard DeleteMoet reotA Otlier Etock atE'aori Foto'atow Cr~ M~asL From: Powellt Amy Sent: ton3!29/2010 4:05 PH1 To: Powell, Amy Bcc; 'pere.modaff'rmail.house.goov; 'jar'es.weindle tmail.thouse.gov'; 'Joies, Keon rfAprops)'; Blair,Rob'%Doug_Clapptapprosenatngov': 'CarrieApostotou",Spener, Peter:;
'Caouto, Annie E*VP):;'Dedrick,Kathy(ENW)','Bscont, G'Uia(Carpe'); iHaynes, Laura (Carper)', 'Freedhoff, 'Nfihar; 'Mattheows.
Kate': 'Sprig, Andrea'; lieumar, Mary:'Ba'an, Jef;
'Cherry, Davi*';'McDonoug',Alexandor (ei'; 'Crstzio, Dayle(Reid' 'Story, Tod' 'greg~facchano-ufniiLhouse,go,'u' 'iohnmmn~engr.senate,gov' 'mact rmo ii~hc,.co';
'5hav, Andrew(Ensign)'; 'Consoivo, Brandon fnrrign)'; 'Shannon.Raborn.*reidlsen.tegon'; 'Agostsi, Karen':'Follum"es, Sam(Energy)'; 'tsyotene~energs.renacegov':
ij
Subject:
DOE,Eureka Countpyfile responses to petitions to intervene aai32.1'0 Ansserof USDeptof Energyi Ipdfp(35KBI At Hi again-As I mentioned ina previous e-mail (March 8.2010), parties currently inthe hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from W01A, SC. and Aiken County, SO. Attached isthe full response filed by the DOE. which isinclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). Inshort, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law inthis issue inthis unique proceeding" (p 2 of the attached).
Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that ittakes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too was inclusive of all five petitioners). Ifanyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing. please let me know I will forvard other responses filed as i receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, VA. SC, and Aiken Count')' will have until April 5th to reply to these responses.
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs
'ii Phone 301-415-1673
'ttIII:12.Mie iOft 0#iceo.0_ ovIM -Ntioi 00.NRDocue t l :tMu sotY>1 I)ýhihlq3
I,.
Powell, Amy From: Powell, Amy Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:05 PM To: Powell, Amy
Subject:
DOE, Eureka County file responses to petitions to intervene Attachments: 3-29-10 Answer of US Dept of Energy[1].pdf Hi again -
As I mentioned in a previous e-mail (March 8, 2010), parties currently in the hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from WA, SC, and Aiken County, SC. Attached is the full response filed by the DOE, which is inclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). In short, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law in this issue in this unique proceeding" (p. 2 of the attached).
Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that it takes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too, was inclusive of all five petitioners). If anyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing, please let me know.
I will forward other responses filed as I receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, WA, SC, and Aiken County will have until April 5th to reply to these responses.
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1