ML101720455: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:j CO, u ~k~ ~u' fts po::t, St-rc u tr:r F t~r tin tO Related PRpiý P~ply .Foroard Delete Moet reotA Otlier Etock Cr~ atE'aori Foto'atow M~asL From: Powellt Amy To: Powell, Amy Sent: ton3!29/2010 4:05 PH1 Bcc; 'pere.modaff'rmail.house.goov;  
{{#Wiki_filter:~k~
'jar'es.weindle tmail.thouse.gov';  
CO, u~u'     fts   po::t,       St-rc u       tr:r       F t~r     tin tO j
'Joies, Keon rfAprops)';
Related PRpiýP~ply       .Foroard     DeleteMoet        reotA     Otlier     Etock                       atE'aori Foto'atow Cr~                  M~asL From:           Powellt Amy                                                                                                                                                       Sent: ton3!29/2010 4:05 PH1 To:              Powell, Amy Bcc;             'pere.modaff'rmail.house.goov; 'jar'es.weindle tmail.thouse.gov'; 'Joies, Keon rfAprops)'; Blair,Rob'%Doug_Clapptapprosenatngov': 'CarrieApostotou",Spener, Peter:;
Blair, Rob'% Doug_Clapptapprosenatngov':  
                'Caouto, Annie E*VP):;'Dedrick,Kathy(ENW)','Bscont, G'Uia(Carpe');           iHaynes, Laura (Carper)', 'Freedhoff, 'Nfihar; 'Mattheows.
'Carrie Apostotou", Spener, Peter:;'Caouto, Annie 'Dedrick, Kathy (ENW)', 'Bscont, G'Uia (Carpe');
Kate': 'Sprig, Andrea'; lieumar, Mary:'Ba'an, Jef;
iHaynes, Laura (Carper)', 'Freedhoff, 'Nfihar; 'Mattheows.
                'Cherry, Davi*';'McDonoug',Alexandor (ei'; 'Crstzio, Dayle(Reid' 'Story, Tod' 'greg~facchano-ufniiLhouse,go,'u' 'iohnmmn~engr.senate,gov' 'mact                   rmo ii~hc,.co';
Kate': 'Sprig, Andrea'; lieumar, Mary: 'Ba'an, Jef;'Cherry, 'McDonoug', Alexandor (ei'; 'Crstzio, Dayle (Reid' 'Story, Tod' 'greg~facchano-ufniiLhouse,go,'u'  
                '5hav, Andrew(Ensign)';   'Consoivo, Brandon fnrrign)'; 'Shannon.Raborn.*reidlsen.tegon'; 'Agostsi, Karen':'Follum"es,     Sam(Energy)'; 'tsyotene~energs.renacegov':
'iohnmmn~
ij
engr.senate,gov'  
'mact rmo ii~hc,.co';
'5hav, Andrew (Ensign)';  
'Consoivo, Brandon fnrrign)';  
'Agostsi, Karen': 'Follum"es, Sam (Energy)';  
'tsyotene~energs.renacegov':


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
DOE, Eureka Countpyfile responses to petitions to intervene aa i32.1'0 Ansserof US Dept of Energyi Ipdfp(35 KBI Hi again-As I mentioned in a previous e-mail (March 8. 2010), parties currently in the hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from W01A, SC. and Aiken County, SO. Attached is the full response filed by the DOE. which is inclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). In short, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law in this issue in this unique proceeding" (p 2 of the attached).
DOE,Eureka Countpyfile responses to petitions to intervene aai32.1'0 Ansserof USDeptof Energyi Ipdfp(35KBI At Hi again-As I mentioned ina previous e-mail (March 8.2010), parties currently inthe hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from W01A,       SC. and Aiken County, SO. Attached isthe full response filed by the DOE. which isinclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). Inshort, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law inthis issue inthis unique proceeding" (p 2 of the attached).
Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that it takes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too was inclusive of all five petitioners).
Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that ittakes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too was inclusive of all five petitioners). Ifanyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing. please let me know I will forvard other responses filed as i receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, VA. SC, and Aiken Count')' will have until April 5th to reply to these responses.
If anyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing. please let me know ij At I will forvard other responses filed as i receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, VA. SC, and April 5th to reply to these responses.
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone 301-415-1673 Aiken Count')' will have until'ii'ttIII:12.Mie iOft 0#iceo. 0_ ovIM -Ntioi 00.NRDocue t l :t Mu sotY>1 hlq3 I )ýhi I,.Powell, Amy From: Powell, Amy Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:05 PM To: Powell, Amy  
                                                                                                                                                                                                            'ii Phone 301-415-1673
      'ttIII:12.Mie iOft 0#iceo.0_                     ovIM -Ntioi   00.NRDocue             t l :tMu sotY>1 I)ýhihlq3
 
I,.
Powell, Amy From:                         Powell, Amy Sent:                         Monday, March 29, 2010 4:05 PM To:                           Powell, Amy


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
DOE, Eureka County file responses to petitions to intervene Attachments:
DOE, Eureka County file responses to petitions to intervene Attachments:                 3-29-10 Answer of US Dept of Energy[1].pdf Hi again -
3-29-10 Answer of US Dept of Energy[1].pdf Hi again -As I mentioned in a previous e-mail (March 8, 2010), parties currently in the hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from WA, SC, and Aiken County, SC. Attached is the full response filed by the DOE, which is inclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). In short, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law in this issue in this unique proceeding" (p. 2 of the attached).
As I mentioned in a previous e-mail (March 8, 2010), parties currently in the hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from WA, SC, and Aiken County, SC. Attached is the full response filed by the DOE, which is inclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). In short, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law in this issue in this unique proceeding" (p. 2 of the attached).
Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that it takes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too, was inclusive of all five petitioners).
Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that it takes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too, was inclusive of all five petitioners). If anyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing, please let me know.
If anyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing, please let me know.I will forward other responses filed as I receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, WA, SC, and Aiken County will have until April 5th to reply to these responses.
I will forward other responses filed as I receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, WA, SC, and Aiken County will have until April 5th to reply to these responses.
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1}}
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1}}

Latest revision as of 17:53, 13 November 2019

E-mail from Amy Powell to Mcdonough, Alexander (Reid); Cristinzio, Dayle (Reid), and Sharon Raborn (Reid) DOE Eureka County File Responses to Petitions to Intervene (Attachment: ML100880300)
ML101720455
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island, 06300001  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/29/2010
From: Amy Powell
Office of Congressional Affairs
To: Amy Powell
Office of Congressional Affairs
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0199
Download: ML101720455 (2)


Text

~k~

CO, u~u' fts po::t, St-rc u tr:r F t~r tin tO j

Related PRpiýP~ply .Foroard DeleteMoet reotA Otlier Etock atE'aori Foto'atow Cr~ M~asL From: Powellt Amy Sent: ton3!29/2010 4:05 PH1 To: Powell, Amy Bcc; 'pere.modaff'rmail.house.goov; 'jar'es.weindle tmail.thouse.gov'; 'Joies, Keon rfAprops)'; Blair,Rob'%Doug_Clapptapprosenatngov': 'CarrieApostotou",Spener, Peter:;

'Caouto, Annie E*VP):;'Dedrick,Kathy(ENW)','Bscont, G'Uia(Carpe'); iHaynes, Laura (Carper)', 'Freedhoff, 'Nfihar; 'Mattheows.

Kate': 'Sprig, Andrea'; lieumar, Mary:'Ba'an, Jef;

'Cherry, Davi*';'McDonoug',Alexandor (ei'; 'Crstzio, Dayle(Reid' 'Story, Tod' 'greg~facchano-ufniiLhouse,go,'u' 'iohnmmn~engr.senate,gov' 'mact rmo ii~hc,.co';

'5hav, Andrew(Ensign)'; 'Consoivo, Brandon fnrrign)'; 'Shannon.Raborn.*reidlsen.tegon'; 'Agostsi, Karen':'Follum"es, Sam(Energy)'; 'tsyotene~energs.renacegov':

ij

Subject:

DOE,Eureka Countpyfile responses to petitions to intervene aai32.1'0 Ansserof USDeptof Energyi Ipdfp(35KBI At Hi again-As I mentioned ina previous e-mail (March 8.2010), parties currently inthe hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from W01A, SC. and Aiken County, SO. Attached isthe full response filed by the DOE. which isinclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). Inshort, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law inthis issue inthis unique proceeding" (p 2 of the attached).

Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that ittakes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too was inclusive of all five petitioners). Ifanyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing. please let me know I will forvard other responses filed as i receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, VA. SC, and Aiken Count')' will have until April 5th to reply to these responses.

Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs

'ii Phone 301-415-1673

'ttIII:12.Mie iOft 0#iceo.0_ ovIM -Ntioi 00.NRDocue t l :tMu sotY>1 I)ýhihlq3

I,.

Powell, Amy From: Powell, Amy Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:05 PM To: Powell, Amy

Subject:

DOE, Eureka County file responses to petitions to intervene Attachments: 3-29-10 Answer of US Dept of Energy[1].pdf Hi again -

As I mentioned in a previous e-mail (March 8, 2010), parties currently in the hearing process on the DOE application for a high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain have today as the deadline to file responses with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB or the Board) to the petitions to intervene from WA, SC, and Aiken County, SC. Attached is the full response filed by the DOE, which is inclusive of all five petitioners (NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community being the other two). In short, the DOE does not oppose the petitions to intervene, stating that the petitioners "should be able to present their differing view of the law in this issue in this unique proceeding" (p. 2 of the attached).

Eureka County filed a one statement response indicating that it takes no position on the petitions to intervene (this filing, too, was inclusive of all five petitioners). If anyone would like a pdf of Eureka County's one-line filing, please let me know.

I will forward other responses filed as I receive them. After today's filing deadline for the parties' responses, WA, SC, and Aiken County will have until April 5th to reply to these responses.

Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1