ML111101551: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Transition of Non-Pilot Licensees to NFPA 805 NRC Public MeetingApril 14, 2011 PurposeDiscuss sequenced approach to LAR submittalsProvide industry considerations that factoredintosequencing factored into sequencingProvide projected results and need for implementing sequenced approachProvide suggestions on LAR review approach and adjustment to monthly
{{#Wiki_filter:Transition of Non-Pilot Licensees to NFPA 805 NRC Public Meeting April 14, 2011


status meetings to support reviews Sequenced NFPA 805 ApplicationCurrent non-pilot plant submittals
Purpose Discuss sequenced approach to LAR submittals Provide industry considerations that factored into sequencing Provide projected results and need for implementing sequenced approach Provide suggestions on LAR review approach and adjustment to monthly status meetings to support reviews
-23 LARs (33 units) by June 29, 2011
-LIC 109 reviews extended to 60 days
-Pilot reviews took over 2 years when originally estimatedforonly6months estimated for only 6 months-Review and SE issuance for 23 submittals will require multiple review teams to support a 2 year review timeframe
-"-the staff and the industry have underestimated the complexity and resources necessary to address the technical issues associated with review and approval of LARs for use of NFPA


805."
Sequenced NFPA 805 Application Current non-pilot plant submittals
Sequenced NFPA 805 ApplicationImpact of current submittal approach
  - 23 LARs (33 units) by June 29, 2011
-Opportunity lost to apply lessons learned or improvements in FPRA methodologyMultiplereviewteamswillresultin
  - LIC 109 reviews extended to 60 days
-Multiple review teams will result in inconsistent reviews
  - Pilot reviews took over 2 years when originally estimated for only 6 months
-Review period beyond 2 years places undue burden on licensees
  - Review and SE issuance for 23 submittals will require multiple review teams to support a 2 year review timeframe
*Risk of losing knowledgeable support
  - the staff and the industry have underestimated the complexity and resources necessary to address the technical issues associated with review and approval of LARs for use of NFPA 805.
*Additional significant financial cost Sequenced NFPA 805 ApplicationIntroduction of staggered approach
-NEI letters to NRC recommending staggered approach to LAR submittals
*February22007
*February 2 , 2007*March 7, 2008
*November 15, 2010
-ACRS Letter issued February 17, 2011
-SECY 11-0033 issued March 4, 2011 Sequenced NFPA 805 ApplicationBenefits of sequenced submittals
-Allow application of any improvements developed in the FPRA methodology
-Incorporate lessons learned Piltifti*Pil o t i n f orma ti on*Fleet information
*RAIs from early submittals
-More consistent reviews by limiting the number of required review teams
-Stable, predictable and efficient transition Industry Considerations for Sequencing  Management of fleet stations
-Internal resource utilization
-Incorporation of lessons learned
-Program consistencyStation designsFire PRA-Status-Approach-Peer Review Industry Considerations for Sequencing Fire PRA methodology improvementsOther significant licensee applications
-License Renewal
-Riskinformedapplications Risk informed applications
-EPUOutage and modification schedulesIndustry and vendor resourcesLicense CommitmentsFAQ closure Projected Industry Submittals under Sequenced ApproachFiscal Year 2011 -7 to 9 Fiscal Year 2012 -10 to 12Fiscal Year 2013 -9 to 11 Enforcement Policy RevisionSECY-11-0033 recommends staggered submittals and reviews of LARsStaff to submit policy paper recommendingchangestoEnforcement recommending changes to Enforcement PolicyEnforcement policy revision required now to preclude expending industry and staff


resources on applications LAR Review ApproachProcess reviewed and approved (NEI 04-02, FAQs, SE and LAR templates)Suggest NRC review teams organized by subject matter experts/LAR sectionsMiifltidititM ax i m i ze use o f e l ec t ron i c au dit s it eSample review of items where licensee state compliance with NFPA 805 without
Sequenced NFPA 805 Application Impact of current submittal approach
  - Opportunity lost to apply lessons learned or improvements in FPRA methodology
  - Multiple review teams will result in inconsistent reviews
  - Review period beyond 2 years places undue burden on licensees
* Risk of losing knowledgeable support
* Additional significant financial cost


conditionsIndustry will provide a matrix of sections requesting specific approval Monthly Status MeetingsAdjust monthly FAQ public meeting
Sequenced NFPA 805 Application Introduction of staggered approach
-High level status of LAR reviews
  - NEI letters to NRC recommending staggered approach to LAR submittals
-RAIs with generic applicationsNeedfornewFAQs
* February 2, 2 2007
-Need for new FAQsBenefits-Timely recognition and response to generic issues
* March 7, 2008
-Maintain consistency in reviews and responses}}
* November 15, 2010
  - ACRS Letter issued February 17, 2011
  - SECY 11-0033 issued March 4, 2011
 
Sequenced NFPA 805 Application Benefits of sequenced submittals
  - Allow application of any improvements developed in the FPRA methodology
  - Incorporate lessons learned
* Pil Pilott iinformation f    ti
* Fleet information
* RAIs from early submittals
  - More consistent reviews by limiting the number of required review teams
  - Stable, predictable and efficient transition
 
Industry Considerations for Sequencing Management of fleet stations
    - Internal resource utilization
    - Incorporation of lessons learned
    - Program consistency Station designs Fire PRA
    - Status
    - Approach
    - Peer Review
 
Industry Considerations for Sequencing Fire PRA methodology improvements Other significant licensee applications
  - License Renewal
  - Risk informed applications
  - EPU Outage and modification schedules Industry and vendor resources License Commitments FAQ closure
 
Projected Industry Submittals under Sequenced Approach Fiscal Year 2011 - 7 to 9 Fiscal Year 2012 - 10 to 12 Fiscal Year 2013 - 9 to 11
 
Enforcement Policy Revision SECY-11-0033 recommends staggered submittals and reviews of LARs Staff to submit policy paper recommending changes to Enforcement Policy Enforcement policy revision required now to preclude expending industry and staff resources on applications
 
LAR Review Approach Process reviewed and approved (NEI 04-02, FAQs, SE and LAR templates)
Suggest NRC review teams organized by subject matter experts/LAR sections Maximize M i i use off electronic l t i audit dit site it Sample review of items where licensee state compliance with NFPA 805 without conditions Industry will provide a matrix of sections requesting specific approval
 
Monthly Status Meetings Adjust monthly FAQ public meeting
  - High level status of LAR reviews
  - RAIs with generic applications
  - Need for new FAQs Benefits
  - Timely recognition and response to generic issues
  - Maintain consistency in reviews and responses}}

Latest revision as of 01:43, 13 November 2019

Enclosure 3 - 4/14/11 NFPA NRC Public Mtg
ML111101551
Person / Time
Site: Nuclear Energy Institute
Issue date: 04/14/2011
From:
Nuclear Energy Institute
To:
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, NRC/NRR/DRA, NRC/RES/DRA, Nuclear Energy Institute
Pickett D, NRR/DORL/LPL1-1, 415-1364
Shared Package
ml111101501 List:
References
Download: ML111101551 (12)
v • d • e


Text

Transition of Non-Pilot Licensees to NFPA 805 NRC Public Meeting April 14, 2011

Purpose Discuss sequenced approach to LAR submittals Provide industry considerations that factored into sequencing Provide projected results and need for implementing sequenced approach Provide suggestions on LAR review approach and adjustment to monthly status meetings to support reviews

Sequenced NFPA 805 Application Current non-pilot plant submittals

- 23 LARs (33 units) by June 29, 2011

- LIC 109 reviews extended to 60 days

- Pilot reviews took over 2 years when originally estimated for only 6 months

- Review and SE issuance for 23 submittals will require multiple review teams to support a 2 year review timeframe

- the staff and the industry have underestimated the complexity and resources necessary to address the technical issues associated with review and approval of LARs for use of NFPA 805.

Sequenced NFPA 805 Application Impact of current submittal approach

- Opportunity lost to apply lessons learned or improvements in FPRA methodology

- Multiple review teams will result in inconsistent reviews

- Review period beyond 2 years places undue burden on licensees

  • Risk of losing knowledgeable support
  • Additional significant financial cost

Sequenced NFPA 805 Application Introduction of staggered approach

- NEI letters to NRC recommending staggered approach to LAR submittals

  • February 2, 2 2007
  • March 7, 2008
  • November 15, 2010

- ACRS Letter issued February 17, 2011

- SECY 11-0033 issued March 4, 2011

Sequenced NFPA 805 Application Benefits of sequenced submittals

- Allow application of any improvements developed in the FPRA methodology

- Incorporate lessons learned

  • Pil Pilott iinformation f ti
  • Fleet information
  • RAIs from early submittals

- More consistent reviews by limiting the number of required review teams

- Stable, predictable and efficient transition

Industry Considerations for Sequencing Management of fleet stations

- Internal resource utilization

- Incorporation of lessons learned

- Program consistency Station designs Fire PRA

- Status

- Approach

- Peer Review

Industry Considerations for Sequencing Fire PRA methodology improvements Other significant licensee applications

- License Renewal

- Risk informed applications

- EPU Outage and modification schedules Industry and vendor resources License Commitments FAQ closure

Projected Industry Submittals under Sequenced Approach Fiscal Year 2011 - 7 to 9 Fiscal Year 2012 - 10 to 12 Fiscal Year 2013 - 9 to 11

Enforcement Policy Revision SECY-11-0033 recommends staggered submittals and reviews of LARs Staff to submit policy paper recommending changes to Enforcement Policy Enforcement policy revision required now to preclude expending industry and staff resources on applications

LAR Review Approach Process reviewed and approved (NEI 04-02, FAQs, SE and LAR templates)

Suggest NRC review teams organized by subject matter experts/LAR sections Maximize M i i use off electronic l t i audit dit site it Sample review of items where licensee state compliance with NFPA 805 without conditions Industry will provide a matrix of sections requesting specific approval

Monthly Status Meetings Adjust monthly FAQ public meeting

- High level status of LAR reviews

- RAIs with generic applications

- Need for new FAQs Benefits

- Timely recognition and response to generic issues

- Maintain consistency in reviews and responses

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML111101551&oldid=2118765"