RBG-47151, Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:Entergy Operations, Inc. | ||
River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61 N Entegya St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4374 Eric W. Olson Vice President, Operations River Bend Station June 9, 2011 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD. 20852 RBG-47151 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies River Bend Station -Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 | 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 | ||
==Reference:== | ==Reference:== | ||
NRC Bulletin 2011-01: Mitigating Strategies, dated May 11, 2011 | |||
==Dear Sir or Madam:== | |||
On May 11, 2011, the NRC issued the referenced Bulletin 2011-01, and requested a written response within 30 days. Attached is Entergy's 30-day written response for River Bend Station. | |||
On May 11, 2011, the NRC issued the referenced Bulletin 2011-01, and requested a written response within 30 days. Attached is Entergy's 30-day written response for River Bend Station.In response to the events on September 11, 2001, and NRC requirements, Entergy developed preplanned strategies and implemented guidance to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with the loss of large areas of the plant due to fire or explosions. | In response to the events on September 11, 2001, and NRC requirements, Entergy developed preplanned strategies and implemented guidance to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with the loss of large areas of the plant due to fire or explosions. Following the events on March 11, 2011, at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Entergy took actions to ensure availability of these capabilities. The attached response reflects these actions. | ||
Following the events on March 11, 2011, at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Entergy took actions to ensure availability of these capabilities. | There are no new commitments contained in this submittal. | ||
The attached response reflects these actions.There are no new commitments contained in this submittal. | |||
If you need any additional information, please contact Mr. David Lorfing, Manager-Licensing, at 225-381-4157. | If you need any additional information, please contact Mr. David Lorfing, Manager-Licensing, at 225-381-4157. | ||
I declare under penalty of perjury that the contents of this response are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed on this 9th day of June 2011.Sincerely, EWO/wjf Attachment 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies RBG-47151 Page 2 of 2 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Alan Wang, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 0-8B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 RBG-47151 Attachment 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01 Attachment to RBG-47151 QUESTION I Is the equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies, as described in your submittals to the NRC, available and capable of performing its intended function?RESPONSE The strategies required by section B.5.b of the Interim Compensatory Measures Order EA-02-026 and implemented pursuant to a license condition were submitted to the NRC by References 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and reviewed and approved by the NRC in Reference 6.Entergy assessed the status of equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the equipment is available and capable of performing its intended function.QUESTION 2 Are the guidance and strategies implemented capable of being executed considering the current configuration of your facility and current staffing and skill levels of the staff?RESPONSE Entergy assessed the capability to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the guidance and strategies are capable of being executed considering the current configuration of the facility, staffing and skill levels of the staff.REFERENCES | I declare under penalty of perjury that the contents of this response are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed on this 9th day of June 2011. | ||
: 1. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Response to NRC Guidance Regarding Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46443, dated May 31, 2005 2. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Mitigating Strategies Request for Additional Information, RBG-46482, dated September 29, 2005 3. Letter, P. Hinnenkamp to USNRC, Response to Report of Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Safeguards Interim Compensatory Measures -Section B.5.b Temporary Instruction 2515/164; NRC Inspection Report [0500045812005012], RBG-46537, dated February 27, 2006 4. Letter, R. King to USNRC, Response Providing Information Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigating Strategies, RBG-46642, dated January 11, 2007 5. Letter, J. Roberts to USNRC, Supplementary Response Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46696, dated May 14, 2007 6. Letter, USNRC to J. Venable, Conforming License Amendment to Incorporate the Mitigation Strategies Required By Section B.5.b of Commission Order EA-02-026 (TAC No. MD4556) dated August 2, 2007}} | Sincerely, EWO/wjf Attachment | ||
30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies RBG-47151 Page 2 of 2 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Alan Wang, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 0-8B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 | |||
RBG-47151 Attachment 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01 | |||
Attachment to RBG-47151 QUESTION I Is the equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies, as described in your submittals to the NRC, available and capable of performing its intended function? | |||
===RESPONSE=== | |||
The strategies required by section B.5.b of the Interim Compensatory Measures Order EA-02-026 and implemented pursuant to a license condition were submitted to the NRC by References 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and reviewed and approved by the NRC in Reference 6. | |||
Entergy assessed the status of equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the equipment is available and capable of performing its intended function. | |||
QUESTION 2 Are the guidance and strategies implemented capable of being executed considering the current configuration of your facility and current staffing and skill levels of the staff? | |||
===RESPONSE=== | |||
Entergy assessed the capability to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the guidance and strategies are capable of being executed considering the current configuration of the facility, staffing and skill levels of the staff. | |||
REFERENCES | |||
: 1. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Response to NRC Guidance Regarding Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46443, dated May 31, 2005 | |||
: 2. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Mitigating Strategies Request for Additional Information, RBG-46482, dated September 29, 2005 | |||
: 3. Letter, P. Hinnenkamp to USNRC, Response to Report of Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Safeguards Interim Compensatory Measures - Section B.5.b Temporary Instruction 2515/164; NRC Inspection Report [0500045812005012], RBG-46537, dated February 27, 2006 | |||
: 4. Letter, R. King to USNRC, Response Providing Information Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigating Strategies, RBG-46642, dated January 11, 2007 | |||
: 5. Letter, J. Roberts to USNRC, Supplementary Response Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46696, dated May 14, 2007 | |||
: 6. Letter, USNRC to J. Venable, Conforming License Amendment to Incorporate the Mitigation Strategies Required By Section B.5.b of Commission Order EA-02-026 (TAC No. MD4556) dated August 2, 2007}} | |||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:Entergy Operations, Inc. | ||
River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61 N Entegya St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4374 Eric W. Olson Vice President, Operations River Bend Station June 9, 2011 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD. 20852 RBG-47151 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies River Bend Station -Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 | 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 | ||
==Reference:== | ==Reference:== | ||
NRC Bulletin 2011-01: Mitigating Strategies, dated May 11, 2011 | |||
==Dear Sir or Madam:== | |||
On May 11, 2011, the NRC issued the referenced Bulletin 2011-01, and requested a written response within 30 days. Attached is Entergy's 30-day written response for River Bend Station. | |||
On May 11, 2011, the NRC issued the referenced Bulletin 2011-01, and requested a written response within 30 days. Attached is Entergy's 30-day written response for River Bend Station.In response to the events on September 11, 2001, and NRC requirements, Entergy developed preplanned strategies and implemented guidance to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with the loss of large areas of the plant due to fire or explosions. | In response to the events on September 11, 2001, and NRC requirements, Entergy developed preplanned strategies and implemented guidance to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with the loss of large areas of the plant due to fire or explosions. Following the events on March 11, 2011, at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Entergy took actions to ensure availability of these capabilities. The attached response reflects these actions. | ||
Following the events on March 11, 2011, at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Entergy took actions to ensure availability of these capabilities. | There are no new commitments contained in this submittal. | ||
The attached response reflects these actions.There are no new commitments contained in this submittal. | |||
If you need any additional information, please contact Mr. David Lorfing, Manager-Licensing, at 225-381-4157. | If you need any additional information, please contact Mr. David Lorfing, Manager-Licensing, at 225-381-4157. | ||
I declare under penalty of perjury that the contents of this response are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed on this 9th day of June 2011.Sincerely, EWO/wjf Attachment 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies RBG-47151 Page 2 of 2 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Alan Wang, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 0-8B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 RBG-47151 Attachment 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01 Attachment to RBG-47151 QUESTION I Is the equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies, as described in your submittals to the NRC, available and capable of performing its intended function?RESPONSE The strategies required by section B.5.b of the Interim Compensatory Measures Order EA-02-026 and implemented pursuant to a license condition were submitted to the NRC by References 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and reviewed and approved by the NRC in Reference 6.Entergy assessed the status of equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the equipment is available and capable of performing its intended function.QUESTION 2 Are the guidance and strategies implemented capable of being executed considering the current configuration of your facility and current staffing and skill levels of the staff?RESPONSE Entergy assessed the capability to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the guidance and strategies are capable of being executed considering the current configuration of the facility, staffing and skill levels of the staff.REFERENCES | I declare under penalty of perjury that the contents of this response are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed on this 9th day of June 2011. | ||
: 1. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Response to NRC Guidance Regarding Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46443, dated May 31, 2005 2. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Mitigating Strategies Request for Additional Information, RBG-46482, dated September 29, 2005 3. Letter, P. Hinnenkamp to USNRC, Response to Report of Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Safeguards Interim Compensatory Measures -Section B.5.b Temporary Instruction 2515/164; NRC Inspection Report [0500045812005012], RBG-46537, dated February 27, 2006 4. Letter, R. King to USNRC, Response Providing Information Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigating Strategies, RBG-46642, dated January 11, 2007 5. Letter, J. Roberts to USNRC, Supplementary Response Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46696, dated May 14, 2007 6. Letter, USNRC to J. Venable, Conforming License Amendment to Incorporate the Mitigation Strategies Required By Section B.5.b of Commission Order EA-02-026 (TAC No. MD4556) dated August 2, 2007}} | Sincerely, EWO/wjf Attachment | ||
30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies RBG-47151 Page 2 of 2 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Alan Wang, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 0-8B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 | |||
RBG-47151 Attachment 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01 | |||
Attachment to RBG-47151 QUESTION I Is the equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies, as described in your submittals to the NRC, available and capable of performing its intended function? | |||
===RESPONSE=== | |||
The strategies required by section B.5.b of the Interim Compensatory Measures Order EA-02-026 and implemented pursuant to a license condition were submitted to the NRC by References 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and reviewed and approved by the NRC in Reference 6. | |||
Entergy assessed the status of equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the equipment is available and capable of performing its intended function. | |||
QUESTION 2 Are the guidance and strategies implemented capable of being executed considering the current configuration of your facility and current staffing and skill levels of the staff? | |||
===RESPONSE=== | |||
Entergy assessed the capability to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the guidance and strategies are capable of being executed considering the current configuration of the facility, staffing and skill levels of the staff. | |||
REFERENCES | |||
: 1. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Response to NRC Guidance Regarding Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46443, dated May 31, 2005 | |||
: 2. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Mitigating Strategies Request for Additional Information, RBG-46482, dated September 29, 2005 | |||
: 3. Letter, P. Hinnenkamp to USNRC, Response to Report of Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Safeguards Interim Compensatory Measures - Section B.5.b Temporary Instruction 2515/164; NRC Inspection Report [0500045812005012], RBG-46537, dated February 27, 2006 | |||
: 4. Letter, R. King to USNRC, Response Providing Information Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigating Strategies, RBG-46642, dated January 11, 2007 | |||
: 5. Letter, J. Roberts to USNRC, Supplementary Response Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46696, dated May 14, 2007 | |||
: 6. Letter, USNRC to J. Venable, Conforming License Amendment to Incorporate the Mitigation Strategies Required By Section B.5.b of Commission Order EA-02-026 (TAC No. MD4556) dated August 2, 2007}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:40, 12 November 2019
| ML11165A093 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | River Bend  |
| Issue date: | 06/09/2011 |
| From: | Olson E Entergy Operations |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| BL-11-001, RBG-47151 | |
| Download: ML11165A093 (4) | |
Text
Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61 N Entegya St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4374 Eric W. Olson Vice President, Operations River Bend Station June 9, 2011 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD. 20852 RBG-47151
Subject:
30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47
Reference:
NRC Bulletin 2011-01: Mitigating Strategies, dated May 11, 2011
Dear Sir or Madam:
On May 11, 2011, the NRC issued the referenced Bulletin 2011-01, and requested a written response within 30 days. Attached is Entergy's 30-day written response for River Bend Station.
In response to the events on September 11, 2001, and NRC requirements, Entergy developed preplanned strategies and implemented guidance to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with the loss of large areas of the plant due to fire or explosions. Following the events on March 11, 2011, at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Entergy took actions to ensure availability of these capabilities. The attached response reflects these actions.
There are no new commitments contained in this submittal.
If you need any additional information, please contact Mr. David Lorfing, Manager-Licensing, at 225-381-4157.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the contents of this response are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed on this 9th day of June 2011.
Sincerely, EWO/wjf Attachment
30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies RBG-47151 Page 2 of 2 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Alan Wang, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 0-8B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738
RBG-47151 Attachment 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01
Attachment to RBG-47151 QUESTION I Is the equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies, as described in your submittals to the NRC, available and capable of performing its intended function?
RESPONSE
The strategies required by section B.5.b of the Interim Compensatory Measures Order EA-02-026 and implemented pursuant to a license condition were submitted to the NRC by References 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and reviewed and approved by the NRC in Reference 6.
Entergy assessed the status of equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the equipment is available and capable of performing its intended function.
QUESTION 2 Are the guidance and strategies implemented capable of being executed considering the current configuration of your facility and current staffing and skill levels of the staff?
RESPONSE
Entergy assessed the capability to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the guidance and strategies are capable of being executed considering the current configuration of the facility, staffing and skill levels of the staff.
REFERENCES
- 1. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Response to NRC Guidance Regarding Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46443, dated May 31, 2005
- 2. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Mitigating Strategies Request for Additional Information, RBG-46482, dated September 29, 2005
- 3. Letter, P. Hinnenkamp to USNRC, Response to Report of Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Safeguards Interim Compensatory Measures - Section B.5.b Temporary Instruction 2515/164; NRC Inspection Report [0500045812005012], RBG-46537, dated February 27, 2006
- 4. Letter, R. King to USNRC, Response Providing Information Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigating Strategies, RBG-46642, dated January 11, 2007
- 5. Letter, J. Roberts to USNRC, Supplementary Response Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46696, dated May 14, 2007
- 6. Letter, USNRC to J. Venable, Conforming License Amendment to Incorporate the Mitigation Strategies Required By Section B.5.b of Commission Order EA-02-026 (TAC No. MD4556) dated August 2, 2007
Text
Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61 N Entegya St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225-381-4374 Eric W. Olson Vice President, Operations River Bend Station June 9, 2011 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD. 20852 RBG-47151
Subject:
30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47
Reference:
NRC Bulletin 2011-01: Mitigating Strategies, dated May 11, 2011
Dear Sir or Madam:
On May 11, 2011, the NRC issued the referenced Bulletin 2011-01, and requested a written response within 30 days. Attached is Entergy's 30-day written response for River Bend Station.
In response to the events on September 11, 2001, and NRC requirements, Entergy developed preplanned strategies and implemented guidance to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel cooling capabilities under the circumstances associated with the loss of large areas of the plant due to fire or explosions. Following the events on March 11, 2011, at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Entergy took actions to ensure availability of these capabilities. The attached response reflects these actions.
There are no new commitments contained in this submittal.
If you need any additional information, please contact Mr. David Lorfing, Manager-Licensing, at 225-381-4157.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the contents of this response are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed on this 9th day of June 2011.
Sincerely, EWO/wjf Attachment
30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies RBG-47151 Page 2 of 2 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Alan Wang, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 0-8B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738
RBG-47151 Attachment 30-Day Response to NRC Bulletin 2011-01
Attachment to RBG-47151 QUESTION I Is the equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies, as described in your submittals to the NRC, available and capable of performing its intended function?
RESPONSE
The strategies required by section B.5.b of the Interim Compensatory Measures Order EA-02-026 and implemented pursuant to a license condition were submitted to the NRC by References 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and reviewed and approved by the NRC in Reference 6.
Entergy assessed the status of equipment necessary to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the equipment is available and capable of performing its intended function.
QUESTION 2 Are the guidance and strategies implemented capable of being executed considering the current configuration of your facility and current staffing and skill levels of the staff?
RESPONSE
Entergy assessed the capability to execute the mitigating strategies as identified in the referenced letters. Based upon the assessment, the guidance and strategies are capable of being executed considering the current configuration of the facility, staffing and skill levels of the staff.
REFERENCES
- 1. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Response to NRC Guidance Regarding Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46443, dated May 31, 2005
- 2. Letter, D. Lorfing to USNRC, Mitigating Strategies Request for Additional Information, RBG-46482, dated September 29, 2005
- 3. Letter, P. Hinnenkamp to USNRC, Response to Report of Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Safeguards Interim Compensatory Measures - Section B.5.b Temporary Instruction 2515/164; NRC Inspection Report [0500045812005012], RBG-46537, dated February 27, 2006
- 4. Letter, R. King to USNRC, Response Providing Information Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigating Strategies, RBG-46642, dated January 11, 2007
- 5. Letter, J. Roberts to USNRC, Supplementary Response Regarding Implementation Details for the Phase 2 and 3 Mitigation Strategies, RBG-46696, dated May 14, 2007
- 6. Letter, USNRC to J. Venable, Conforming License Amendment to Incorporate the Mitigation Strategies Required By Section B.5.b of Commission Order EA-02-026 (TAC No. MD4556) dated August 2, 2007