|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:July 5, 2011 | | {{#Wiki_filter:July 5, 2011 The Honorable Scott P. Brown United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 |
| | |
| The Honorable Scott P. Brown United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 | |
|
| |
|
| ==Dear Senator Brown:== | | ==Dear Senator Brown:== |
|
| |
|
| On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter of June 2, 2011, regarding renewal of the operating license for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim) near Plymouth, Massachusetts. Pilgrim applied for license renewal in January 2006 and its original 40-year license will expire on June 8, 2012. | | On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter of June 2, 2011, regarding renewal of the operating license for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim) near Plymouth, Massachusetts. Pilgrim applied for license renewal in January 2006 and its original 40-year license will expire on June 8, 2012. |
| The NRC issued its final safety evaluation report (SER) for license renewal of Pilgrim in June 2007 and the final supplemental environmental impact statement in July 2007. Pilgrim Watch (a non-governmental local public interest entity) and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts submitted contentions and requests for hearings during the staff's review and subsequent to issuance of the final SER. Some of these requests are still under active review and consideration. Additionally, the staff issued a supplemental SER on June 30, 2011, to incorporate changes and additions to Pilgrim's aging management programs due to annual updates and relevant operating experience. Throughout this entire license renewal process, there have been numerous opportunities, including public meetings, for the public to share its views on both environmental and safety issues. The hearing process is ongoing, and no final decision has been made on renewal of the operating license for Pilgrim. | | The NRC issued its final safety evaluation report (SER) for license renewal of Pilgrim in June 2007 and the final supplemental environmental impact statement in July 2007. Pilgrim Watch (a non-governmental local public interest entity) and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts submitted contentions and requests for hearings during the staffs review and subsequent to issuance of the final SER. Some of these requests are still under active review and consideration. Additionally, the staff issued a supplemental SER on June 30, 2011, to incorporate changes and additions to Pilgrims aging management programs due to annual updates and relevant operating experience. Throughout this entire license renewal process, there have been numerous opportunities, including public meetings, for the public to share its views on both environmental and safety issues. The hearing process is ongoing, and no final decision has been made on renewal of the operating license for Pilgrim. |
| | | Regarding spent fuel storage at Pilgrim, the spent fuel pools are not over capacity. The amount of spent fuel that can be stored in a pool is governed by a plants technical specifications. |
| Regarding spent fuel storage at Pilgrim, the spent fuel pools are not over capacity. The amount of spent fuel that can be stored in a pool is governed by a plant's technical specifications. Pilgrim has increased its fuel assembly storage limits several times over the past 30 years via NRC-approved license amendments. In each case, the NRC staff concluded that there was reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public would not be endangered, there would not be a significant effect on the quality of the environment, and that the activities would be conducted in compliance with NRC regulations. Current regulations permit "re-racking" (placing fuel rod assemblies in new storage racks designed to safely allow closer spacing in spent fuel pools), subject to NRC review and approval. | | Pilgrim has increased its fuel assembly storage limits several times over the past 30 years via NRC-approved license amendments. In each case, the NRC staff concluded that there was reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public would not be endangered, there would not be a significant effect on the quality of the environment, and that the activities would be conducted in compliance with NRC regulations. Current regulations permit re-racking (placing fuel rod assemblies in new storage racks designed to safely allow closer spacing in spent fuel pools), subject to NRC review and approval. |
| | | In response to recent events in Japan, the Commission directed the NRC staff to establish a senior-level task force to conduct a methodical and systematic review of our processes and regulations to determine whether the agency should make improvements to our regulatory system. The review will include an examination of spent fuel storage practices in light of recent events to determine whether changes to our regulations are necessary and appropriate to ensure continuing protection of public health and safety. |
| In response to recent events in Japan, the Commission directed the NRC staff to establish a senior-level task force to conduct a methodical and systematic review of our processes and regulations to determine whether the agency should make improvements to our regulatory system. The review will include an examination of spent fuel storage practices in light of recent events to determine whether changes to our regulations are necessary and appropriate to ensure continuing protection of public health and safety. | | The risk ranking you mention in your letter was developed by the news media following the NRCs recent updating of seismic core damage frequency (CDF) for operating plants in the central and eastern U.S. based on new U.S. Geological Survey seismic hazard curves. This update was done as part of the agencys Generic Issues (GI) Program that examines selected |
| | |
| The "risk ranking" you mention in your letter was developed by the news media following the NRC's recent updating of seismic core damage frequency (CDF) for operating plants in the central and eastern U.S. based on new U.S. Geological Survey seismic hazard curves. This update was done as part of the agency's Generic Issues (GI) Program that examines selected | |
| | |
| issues affecting multiple plants that may not be covered by existing regulatory processes or criteria. The GI-199 program is investigating the safety and risk implications of updated earthquake-related data and models. The NRC does not rank nuclear power plants by seismic risk; each plant is evaluated individually according to its particular site geology. This recent revision to the CDF for operating plants indicates that the total risk for each plant is well below the threshold for immediate action. Overall, seismic risk estimates remain small in an absolute sense, and all operating plants in the Central and Eastern U.S. have seismic CDFs that are considered safe. Even though the staff has determined that existing plants remain safe, the agency's GI-199 project staff continues its analysis to determine whether any cost-justified plant improvements can be identified to make plants even safer.
| |
| Please be assured that, regardless of whether the NRC is performing a license renewal review, should information at any time now or in the future show that there is a basis to question the continued safe operation of the Pilgrim facility, the NRC will take appropriate action as part of the agency's ongoing safety oversight. If you have any additional concerns, please contact me or Ms. Rebecca Schmidt, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs at (301) 415-1776.
| |
|
| |
|
| Sincerely, /RA/ R.W. Borchardt Executive Director for Operations | | S. Brown issues affecting multiple plants that may not be covered by existing regulatory processes or criteria. The GI-199 program is investigating the safety and risk implications of updated earthquake-related data and models. The NRC does not rank nuclear power plants by seismic risk; each plant is evaluated individually according to its particular site geology. This recent revision to the CDF for operating plants indicates that the total risk for each plant is well below the threshold for immediate action. Overall, seismic risk estimates remain small in an absolute sense, and all operating plants in the Central and Eastern U.S. have seismic CDFs that are considered safe. Even though the staff has determined that existing plants remain safe, the agencys GI-199 project staff continues its analysis to determine whether any cost-justified plant improvements can be identified to make plants even safer. |
| | Please be assured that, regardless of whether the NRC is performing a license renewal review, should information at any time now or in the future show that there is a basis to question the continued safe operation of the Pilgrim facility, the NRC will take appropriate action as part of the agencys ongoing safety oversight. If you have any additional concerns, please contact me or Ms. Rebecca Schmidt, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs at (301) 415-1776. |
| | Sincerely, |
| | /RA/ |
| | R.W. Borchardt Executive Director for Operations |
|
| |
|
| ML11182B022 OFFICE OEDO OCA OGC NRR RES EDO NAME RRihm EDacus (via email) EWilliamson (via email) BHolian (via email) RCorreia (via email) R.W. Borchardt DATE 7/01/11 6/30/11 6/29/11 6/30/11 6/29/11 7/05/11}} | | ML11182B022 OFFICE OEDO OCA OGC NRR RES EDO NAME RRihm EDacus EWilliamson BHolian RCorreia R.W. Borchardt (via email) (via email) (via email) (via email) |
| | DATE 7/01/11 6/30/11 6/29/11 6/30/11 6/29/11 7/05/11}} |
|
---|
Category:Congressional Correspondence
MONTHYEARML21022A2212021-02-0505 February 2021 Letter to Senator Charles Schumer from Margaret Doane Response for NRC to Reconsider Its Decision to Not Allow for a Public Hearing in the Transfer of Indian Point'S License ML19262G4752019-10-0808 October 2019 10-08-19 - Ltr to the Honorable Edward J. Markey, Et Al., Responds to Concerns Related to the NRC Staff Recommendation Regarding a Request from Entergy for Exemptions from Emergency Preparedness and Planning Requirements for Pilgrim Nuclear ML19239A1452019-08-26026 August 2019 Letter to the Honorable Edward J. Markey from Rochelle C. Bavol, Acting Secretary of the Commission, Regarding the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Transfer Request from Entergy and Holtec ML19233A2432019-08-21021 August 2019 LTR-19-0326 Sen Edward Markey, Sen Elizabeth Warren & REP William Keating, Letter Urges to Delay the Final Ruling on the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Transfer Request from Entergy & Holtec Until After the Commission Has Ruled Upon ML19221B4792019-08-0808 August 2019 LTR-19-0310 Sen Edward J. Markey, Letter Urges the Chairman to Direct the NRC Staff to Delay Ruling on the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Transfer Request from Entergy and Holtec (Docket No. 50-293 & 72-1004) ML18341A0162018-12-20020 December 2018 Letter to the Honorable William Keating Responds to His Letter Commenting on Recent NRC Inspection Reports Issued for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML18331A0402018-11-21021 November 2018 Acknowledgement Letter to Congressman William Keating on Pilgrim Inspection Report ML18228A6432018-08-28028 August 2018 Letter to Representative William Keating from Chairman Svinicki Responds to His Letter Regarding the Proposed Sale of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station by Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. to a Subsidiary of Holtec International ML18135A1022018-05-29029 May 2018 Letter to the Honorable Edward Markey from Chairman Svinicki Responds to His Letter Regarding Spent Fuel Storage at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station and the Potential Impacts of Climate Change ML18127A0302018-05-0707 May 2018 Statement of Congressman William R. Keating - NRC Annual Assessment Meeting for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - 03/27/2018 ML18127A0312018-05-0707 May 2018 Statement of Senator Edward J. Markey - NRC Annual Assessment Meeting for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - 03/27/2018 ML18127A0322018-05-0707 May 2018 Statement of Senator Elizabeth Warren - NRC Annual Assessment Meeting for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - 03/27/2018 ML18066A0822018-03-19019 March 2018 Enclosure - Letter to Senator Elizabeth Warren, Et Al., from Chairman Svinicki Regarding Winter Storms and an Inspector for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML16295A0892016-10-20020 October 2016 Letter to Senator Edward J. Markey Et Al., from Chairman Burns, Response to Letter Urging the Commission to Reject a Request from Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. for an Extension of Time to Comply with NRC Order EA-13-109 ML16266A0652016-09-21021 September 2016 LTR-16-0469 Senator Edward J. Markey Et Al., Letter Request to Reject Entergy'S Efforts to Reduce Safety Requirements at Pilgrim ML15309A1282015-11-30030 November 2015 Letter to Senator Edward J. Markey, Et Al., from Chairman Burns Responds to His Letter Seeking Assurance That Decommissioning of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Will Be in Compliance with NRC Regulations (Response) ML15299A1142015-10-21021 October 2015 10-21-15 Ack Ltr to Honorable Edward J Markey - Pilgrim ML15289A1452015-10-15015 October 2015 LTR-15-0519 Senator Edward J. Markey, Letter Request to Ensure That the Remaining Period During Which the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Operates Receives the Utmost Attention to Safety and Security ML13079A2822013-03-26026 March 2013 G20130209/LTR-13-0224 Ltr. to Rep. E. Markey, Et Al. - Responds to Request for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to Alter Plans to Hold Open House Style Meetings to Review the 2012 Performance of Pilgrim and Seabrook ML13079A0202013-03-18018 March 2013 G20130209/LTR-13-0224 - Ltr. Representatives Edward J. Markey, John F. Tierney and Bill Keating Request for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to Alter Plans to Hold Open House Style Meetings to Review the 2012 Performance of Pilgrim and Sea ML13007A4062013-01-0202 January 2013 Comment (136) of Thomas J. Calter, State Representative on Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML12215A0212012-07-31031 July 2012 G20120556/LTR-12-0385/EDATS: SECY-2012-0393 - Rep. Edward J. Markey and Rep. Bill Keating Ltr. Emergency Response Capability at the Pilgrim Nuclear Generating Station During Labor Dispute ML12152A3892012-07-23023 July 2012 LTR-12-0187 - Ltr to Congressmen Edward Markey and William Keating from Chairman Macfarlane Responds to Letter Regarding the twenty-year Extension of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Operating License ML12191A3352012-07-23023 July 2012 G20120430/LTR-12-0277/EDATS: SECY-2012-0310 - Letter to Reps. Edward Markey and William Keating from Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane Concerns About Current Emergency Response Capabilities at Pilgrim Nuclear Generating Station ML12163A5022012-07-23023 July 2012 G20120371/LTR-12-0238/EDATS: OEDO-2012-0270 - Letter to Rep. Edward J. Markey from Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane Re Request That the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Deny Staff'S Request to Re-License the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML12172A3032012-06-0808 June 2012 G20120430/LTR-12-0277/EDATS: SECY-2012-0310 - Ltr. Reps. Edward Markey and William R. Keating Concerns the Current Emergency Response Capability at the Pilgrim Nuclear Generating Station ML12153A0262012-05-24024 May 2012 G20120371/LTR-12-0238/EDATS: SECY-2012-0270 - Ltr. Rep. Edward J. Markey Re Request That the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Deny Staff'S Request to Re-License the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML12145A6922012-05-0404 May 2012 LTR-12-0187 - Incoming from Rep Markey and Rep Keating to Chairman Jaczko Urging the Commission Not to Move Forward with Its Decision on Whether to Issue the twenty-year License Extension for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML12079A2162012-03-21021 March 2012 G20120135/LTR-12-0080/EDATS: SECY-2012-0096 - Ltr to Rep. Edward J. Markey Fm R. W. Borchardt Re Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML12072A3032012-03-0808 March 2012 Letter from the Secretary to the Honorable Edward J. Markey in Response to His February 27, 2012 Letter ML12079A2182012-02-27027 February 2012 G20120135/LTR-12-0080/EDATS: SECY-2012-0096 - Responses to Information Requests from Representative Edward J. Markey ML12061A2152012-02-27027 February 2012 G20120135/LTR-12-0080/EDATS: SECY-2012-0096 Urges NRC Not to Relicense the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Until All Legal Requirements Stipulated by the Endangered Species Act Have Been Met CY-92-223, G20110523/LTR-11-0411/EDATS: SECY-2011-0411 - Ltr. from Rep. E.J. Markey to Chairman Jaczko NRC Safety Requirements for Reactors Granted Construction Permits Prior to 19712011-07-14014 July 2011 G20110523/LTR-11-0411/EDATS: SECY-2011-0411 - Ltr. from Rep. E.J. Markey to Chairman Jaczko NRC Safety Requirements for Reactors Granted Construction Permits Prior to 1971 ML11182B0232011-07-0505 July 2011 G20110446/LTR-11-0340/EDATS: SECY-2011-0337 - Ltr to Senator Scott P. Brown Fm R. W. Borchardt Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plan Safety Concerns ML11165A1792011-06-0202 June 2011 G20110446/LTR-11-0340/EDATS: SECY-2011-0337 - Ltr. Senator Scott P. Brown Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant Safety Concerns ML11137A0422011-05-13013 May 2011 G20110354/LTR-11-0290/EDATS: SECY-2011-0290 - Ltr. Rep. Edward J. Markey Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant - May 10, 2011 Event ML1113905652011-05-12012 May 2011 Fukushima Fallout Regulatory Loopholes at U.S. Nuclear Plants ML1110801492011-04-15015 April 2011 Acknowledgement Ltr. to R. Deleo Re Safety, Storage of Spent Fuel, and Seismic Vulnerability at the Pilgrim Nuclear Plant, and Forwarding Questions from Massachusetts' Legislative Leaders, Identical Ltrs Sent to T. Murray and D. Patrick ML1017903412010-07-21021 July 2010 G20100389/LTR-10-0270/EDATS: SECY-2010-0313 - Ltr, Gregory B. Jaczko Update on Status of the License Renewal Application for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML1020004272010-07-15015 July 2010 G20100451/LTR-10-0327/EDATS: SECY-2010-0367 - Ltr. Rep. Edward J. Markey Recent Discovery of Radioactive Tritium Contamination Near the Pilgrim Nuclear Station ML1019700372010-07-0606 July 2010 G20100440/LTR-10-0325/EDATS: SECY-2010-0357 - Ltr. Rep. Bill Delahunt Status of License Renewal Application for Pilgrim Nuclear Plant ML1016701782010-06-0808 June 2010 G20100389/LTR-10-0270/EDATS: SECY-2010-0313 - Ltr, Senator John F. Kerry Update on Status of the License Renewal Application for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML0407700142004-03-16016 March 2004 2003-04 Pilgrim Annual Assessment Invitational Letters for Safety Performance ML0323405522003-09-15015 September 2003 G20030490/LTR-03-0535 - Senator John F. Kerry Ltr. Emergency Planning in the Event of an Incident at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML0323205282003-07-28028 July 2003 G20030490/LTR-03-0535 - Sen. John F. Kerry Ltr Re Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML0307708712003-03-11011 March 2003 2003 Pilgrim Annual Assessment Invitational Letters ML0230101552002-12-10010 December 2002 G20020606/LTR-02-298 - Sen John Kerry Ltr. Security at Pilgrim, Response Ltr ML0403502672002-10-10010 October 2002 Letter from Sen. Kerry to Dennis Rathbun Regarding Constituent'S Concerns About Security at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML0207801702002-03-18018 March 2002 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Annual Assessment Invitational Letters ML0209802492002-03-0808 March 2002 Appreciation Letter to Gary Holahan from Congressman William D. Delahunt 2021-02-05
[Table view] |
Text
July 5, 2011 The Honorable Scott P. Brown United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Brown:
On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter of June 2, 2011, regarding renewal of the operating license for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim) near Plymouth, Massachusetts. Pilgrim applied for license renewal in January 2006 and its original 40-year license will expire on June 8, 2012.
The NRC issued its final safety evaluation report (SER) for license renewal of Pilgrim in June 2007 and the final supplemental environmental impact statement in July 2007. Pilgrim Watch (a non-governmental local public interest entity) and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts submitted contentions and requests for hearings during the staffs review and subsequent to issuance of the final SER. Some of these requests are still under active review and consideration. Additionally, the staff issued a supplemental SER on June 30, 2011, to incorporate changes and additions to Pilgrims aging management programs due to annual updates and relevant operating experience. Throughout this entire license renewal process, there have been numerous opportunities, including public meetings, for the public to share its views on both environmental and safety issues. The hearing process is ongoing, and no final decision has been made on renewal of the operating license for Pilgrim.
Regarding spent fuel storage at Pilgrim, the spent fuel pools are not over capacity. The amount of spent fuel that can be stored in a pool is governed by a plants technical specifications.
Pilgrim has increased its fuel assembly storage limits several times over the past 30 years via NRC-approved license amendments. In each case, the NRC staff concluded that there was reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public would not be endangered, there would not be a significant effect on the quality of the environment, and that the activities would be conducted in compliance with NRC regulations. Current regulations permit re-racking (placing fuel rod assemblies in new storage racks designed to safely allow closer spacing in spent fuel pools), subject to NRC review and approval.
In response to recent events in Japan, the Commission directed the NRC staff to establish a senior-level task force to conduct a methodical and systematic review of our processes and regulations to determine whether the agency should make improvements to our regulatory system. The review will include an examination of spent fuel storage practices in light of recent events to determine whether changes to our regulations are necessary and appropriate to ensure continuing protection of public health and safety.
The risk ranking you mention in your letter was developed by the news media following the NRCs recent updating of seismic core damage frequency (CDF) for operating plants in the central and eastern U.S. based on new U.S. Geological Survey seismic hazard curves. This update was done as part of the agencys Generic Issues (GI) Program that examines selected
S. Brown issues affecting multiple plants that may not be covered by existing regulatory processes or criteria. The GI-199 program is investigating the safety and risk implications of updated earthquake-related data and models. The NRC does not rank nuclear power plants by seismic risk; each plant is evaluated individually according to its particular site geology. This recent revision to the CDF for operating plants indicates that the total risk for each plant is well below the threshold for immediate action. Overall, seismic risk estimates remain small in an absolute sense, and all operating plants in the Central and Eastern U.S. have seismic CDFs that are considered safe. Even though the staff has determined that existing plants remain safe, the agencys GI-199 project staff continues its analysis to determine whether any cost-justified plant improvements can be identified to make plants even safer.
Please be assured that, regardless of whether the NRC is performing a license renewal review, should information at any time now or in the future show that there is a basis to question the continued safe operation of the Pilgrim facility, the NRC will take appropriate action as part of the agencys ongoing safety oversight. If you have any additional concerns, please contact me or Ms. Rebecca Schmidt, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs at (301) 415-1776.
Sincerely,
/RA/
R.W. Borchardt Executive Director for Operations
ML11182B022 OFFICE OEDO OCA OGC NRR RES EDO NAME RRihm EDacus EWilliamson BHolian RCorreia R.W. Borchardt (via email) (via email) (via email) (via email)
DATE 7/01/11 6/30/11 6/29/11 6/30/11 6/29/11 7/05/11