ML14219A598: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 2:45 PM To: Stephanie.Hanson@exeloncorp.com Cc: David Helker; Lamb, Taylor  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                         Ennis, Rick Sent:                         Thursday, August 07, 2014 2:45 PM To:                           Stephanie.Hanson@exeloncorp.com Cc:                           David Helker; Lamb, Taylor


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for TACs MF4401 & MF4402 - Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 - Adminstrative License and Technical Specification Changes Stephanie, By letter dated July 11, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14192B143), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. The proposed amendment would incorporate several administrative changes to the facility operating license and the technical specifications.
Acceptance Review for TACs MF4401 & MF4402 - Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 - Adminstrative License and Technical Specification Changes Stephanie, By letter dated July 11, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14192B143), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. The proposed amendment would incorporate several administrative changes to the facility operating license and the technical specifications.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.  
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be in stances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.  
 
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.  
 
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}}
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}}

Latest revision as of 02:41, 4 November 2019

Acceptance Review for TACs MF4401 & MF4402 - Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 - Administrative License and Technical Specification Changes
ML14219A598
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/07/2014
From: Richard Ennis
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Hanson S
Exelon Generation Co
Ennis R
References
TAC MF4401, TAC MF4402
Download: ML14219A598 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 2:45 PM To: Stephanie.Hanson@exeloncorp.com Cc: David Helker; Lamb, Taylor

Subject:

Acceptance Review for TACs MF4401 & MF4402 - Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 - Adminstrative License and Technical Specification Changes Stephanie, By letter dated July 11, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14192B143), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. The proposed amendment would incorporate several administrative changes to the facility operating license and the technical specifications.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.

Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14219A598&oldid=2046144"