ML18100A874: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Public*Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station February 14, 1994 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 | {{#Wiki_filter:Public*Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station February 14, 1994 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 | ||
==Dear Sir:== | ==Dear Sir:== | ||
DAILY UNIT POWER Docket No.: 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 Date: 02/10/94 Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone: | MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEM NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-272 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of January 1994 are being sent to you. | ||
339-2122 Month January 1994 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 0 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl e OPERATING DATA REPORT e Docket No: Date: Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone: | Average Daily Unit Power Level Operating Data Report Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions Safety Related Maintenance 10CFR50.59 Evaluations Operating Summary Refueling Information Sincerely yours, ager - | ||
Operating Status 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes 2. Reporting Period January 1994 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 6. Maximum Dependable capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) Report, Give Reason NA 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any 12. Hours in Reporting Period 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 14. Hours Generator On-Line 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) 19. Unit Service Factor 20. Unit Availability Factor 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate | tions RH:pc cc: Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator USNRC Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 Enclosures 8-1-7.R4 The Energy People ______ - - ----- ----- -- -, ----..... | ||
0p*~~21 ~g5g~ 6~86~~72 1 PDR 95-2189 (10M) 12-89 R --~*~~-*-;;;:. | |||
~VERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER L~L Docket No.: 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 Date: 02/10/94 Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone: 339-2122 Month January 1994 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 0 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl | |||
339-2122 COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION CODE 5 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE FUELXX NUCLEAR NORMAL REFUELING Exhibit G -Instructions for Preparation of Data Entry Sheets for Licensee Event Report CLER) File (NUREG-0161) | e OPERATING DATA REPORT e Docket No: 50-272 Date: 02/10/94 Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone: 339-2122 Operating Status | ||
------ | : 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes | ||
: 2. Reporting Period January 1994 | |||
FEBRUARY 10, 1994 R. HELLER (609)339-5162 | : 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411 | ||
: 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170 | |||
: 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115 | |||
: 6. Maximum Dependable capacity(Gross MWe) 1149 | |||
: 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106 | |||
: 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason NA | |||
: 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) NIA | |||
: 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any N/A This Month Year to Date Cumulative | |||
: 12. Hours in Reporting Period 744 744 145441 | |||
: 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 118.2 118.2 95250.17 | |||
: 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 0 0 0 | |||
: 14. Hours Generator On-Line 0 0 91887.84 | |||
: 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0 0 0 | |||
: 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 6895.2 6895.2 290779209.2 | |||
: 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 0 0 96535970 | |||
: 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) -17717 -17717 91919836 | |||
: 19. Unit Service Factor 0 0 63.2 | |||
: 20. Unit Availability Factor 0 0 63.2 | |||
: 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 0 0 57.1 | |||
: 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 0 0 56.7 | |||
: 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 0 0 21.0 | |||
: 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each) | |||
None. | |||
: 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup: | |||
Unit returned to service on 2/2/94. | |||
8-1-7.R2 | |||
UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH JANUARY 1994 DOCKET NO. :_,5'"-"0;..,-*=27'-=2..,,..,.__ __ | |||
UNIT NAME: Salem #1 DATE: 02-08-94 COMPLETED BY: Mike Morroni TELEPHONE: 339-2122 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DURATION DOWN EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 1 2 NO. DATE TYPE (HOURS) REASON REACTOR REPORT # CODE 4 CODE 5 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 0135 01/01/94 s 744 c 4 ----------- RC FUELXX NUCLEAR NORMAL REFUELING | |||
-- | |||
1 2 3 4 5 F: Forced Reason Method: Exhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1 - same S: Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1-Manual for Preparation of Data Source B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refueling 3-Automatic Scram Event Report CLER) File D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of (NUREG-0161) | |||
E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain) | |||
- | |||
SA.~ETY -RELATED MAINT,ANCE MdNTH: - JANUARY 1994 DOCK' NO: | |||
UNIT NAME: | |||
50-272 SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 | |||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
WO NO UNIT 931116130 1 | WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 931116130 1 VALVE 12MS15 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: PLUG THREADS INSIDE BODY DAMAGED DURING REMOVAL - REPLACE 931214109 1 SOLID STATE PROTECTION SYSTEM TRAIN "A" FAILURE DESCRIPTION: OUTPUT TEST READS LOW - | ||
PLUG THREADS INSIDE BODY DAMAGED DURING REMOVAL -REPLACE SOLID STATE PROTECTION SYSTEM TRAIN "A" FAILURE DESCRIPTION: | INVESTIGATE 931214205 1 11 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: MOTOR SLINGER NOT SLINGING - | ||
OUTPUT TEST READS LOW -INVESTIGATE 11 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: | INVESTIGATE 931229159 1 13 REACTOR COOLANT LOOP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: FLOW CHANNEL 2 READS 18% WITH NO LOOP FLOW - INVESTIGATE 940103180 1 12 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: ERRONEOUS INDICATION - | ||
MOTOR SLINGER NOT SLINGING -INVESTIGATE 13 REACTOR COOLANT LOOP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: | INVESTIGATE 940110247 1 VALVE 13SJ54 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE OFF NORMAL INDICATION DID NOT CLEAR - INVESTIGATE 940117073 1 VALVE 12MS10 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE FAILED TO FULLY CLOSE - | ||
FLOW CHANNEL 2 READS 18% WITH NO LOOP FLOW -INVESTIGATE 12 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: | TROUBLESHOOT 940122099 1 VALVE 11BF40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE POSITION WILL NOT REACH 10'0% OPEN, IT WILL ONLY REACH 95% | ||
ERRONEOUS INDICATION | - INVESTIGATE 940122100 1 VALVE 13BF40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE DOES NOT REACH THE OPEN LIMIT - REWORK | ||
VALVE OFF NORMAL INDICATION DID NOT CLEAR -INVESTIGATE VALVE 12MS10 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: | \' | ||
VALVE FAILED TO FULLY CLOSE -TROUBLESHOOT VALVE 11BF40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: | \ | ||
VALVE POSITION WILL NOT REACH 10'0% OPEN, IT WILL ONLY REACH 95% -INVESTIGATE VALVE 13BF40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: | 10,CFR.50. 59 EVALUATIOI DOCK' NO: 50-272 MdNTH: - JANUARY 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations. | ||
VALVE DOES NOT REACH THE OPEN LIMIT -REWORK 10,CFR.50. | ITEM | ||
59 EVALUATIOI MdNTH: -JANUARY 1994 | |||
The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations. | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
EVALUATIO' MdNTH: -JANUARY | A. Design Change Packages lEC-3208 Pkg 2 11 .salem Fire Damper Upgrade" - The design scope for this package includes the replacement, relocation and/or modification of existing fire dampers of Unit l's Auxiliary Building Ventilation (ABV) | ||
Containment Purge System. The function, basic configuration and operation of the system will not be altered and the codes, standards, qualification and design criteria of the original system will apply. Fire dampers lABF-016 and lABF-024 will be modified in place in accordance with the results of the manufacturer's (PREFCO) fire test report recommendations to obtain a 1.5 hour fire rating. | |||
The existing fire protective coating will not be necessary, and later replaced to facilitate damper modification. Fire dampers lABF-222 and lABF-228 will be replaced with new Ruskin 1.5 hour rated fire damper and moved into the fire barrier, eliminating the need for existing fire protective coatings. The reason for this change is to abide by the PSE&G commitment to the NRC and compliance with the requirements to 10CFR50, Appendix R. The margin of safety is not reduced because we are merely enhancing the Fire Protection System to meet the criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix "R". These modifications will not reduce the margin of safety for the Auxiliary Building Ventilation System or the Fire Protection System. (SORC 94-008) | |||
10~FR50.59 EVALUATIO' MdNTH: - JANUARY 19~4 DOCK' NO: | |||
UNIT NAME: | |||
50-272 SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 (cont'd) | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
c.) Added "Manager Planning and Scheduling (Salem only)", and d.) Step 5.7.2: Changed history file location. | B. Procedures and Revisions NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0027(Q) "Inservice Inspection Program" - The revision summary is as follows: | ||
4.) Procedure was reformatted to comply with requirements of NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0032(Q) and NC.NA-AS.ZZ-0001. | 1.) This is a Limited Revision; 2.) The following technical changes was made at Step 5.4: Deleted requirement for SORC review of ISI program submittals to the NRC; 3.) The following minor, editorial changes were made to reflect the recent organization changes: a.) Changed "Nuclear Services" to "Nuclear Support and Services; b.) Changed "Site Services" to "Reliability and Assessment."; c.) Added "Manager Planning and Scheduling (Salem only)", and d.) Step 5.7.2: Changed history file location. | ||
5.) Revision bars were not used for typographical errors. 6.) This revision meets the biennial review requirements of NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0032(Q). | 4.) Procedure was reformatted to comply with requirements of NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0032(Q) and NC.NA-AS.ZZ-0001. | ||
The Salem and Hope Creek Technical Specifications were reviewed, including Sections 4.0 and 6.0. The Technical Specification review did not uncover any inconsistencies with this procedure revision. | 5.) Revision bars were not used for typographical errors. | ||
Therefore, the proposal can not change the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-008) 10.c;,:FRSO | 6.) This revision meets the biennial review requirements of NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0032(Q). | ||
... 59. EVALUATION' | The Salem and Hope Creek Technical Specifications were reviewed, including Sections 4.0 and 6.0. | ||
The Technical Specification review did not uncover any inconsistencies with this procedure revision. | |||
Therefore, the proposal can not change the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-008) | |||
10.c;,:FRSO ... 59. EVALUATION' DOCK.NO: 50-272 M~NTH: - JANUARY 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 (cont'd) | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
: c. Temporary Modifications T-Mod 94-006 "Installation of Temporary Space Heaters" - This T-Mod will provide additional necessary heating to the Unit 1 Auxiliary Feedwater Storage Tank and Refueling Water Storage Tank level instrumentation lines to prevent these instrument and sample lines from freezing. The T-Mod will install a temporary enclosure heated by space heaters. The temporary enclosure will be constructed of scaffold material enclosed by Herculite. The existing heat trace system is not adequate for the present cold spell at Salem Station. This T-Mod will be monitored hourly by Maintenance when the temporary heaters are in service, and removed when weather conditions permit. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-007) | |||
: c. Temporary Modifications T-Mod 94-006 "Installation of Temporary Space Heaters" -This T-Mod will provide additional necessary heating to the Unit 1 Auxiliary Feedwater Storage Tank and Refueling Water Storage Tank level instrumentation lines to prevent these instrument and sample lines from freezing. | D. Deficiency Report (Use-As-Is) | ||
The T-Mod will install a temporary enclosure heated by space heaters. The temporary enclosure will be constructed of scaffold material enclosed by Herculite. | SMD 94-009 "Operability of the 11, 12, 13 and 14 GB4 Valves" | ||
The existing heat trace system is not adequate for the present cold spell at Salem Station. This T-Mod will be monitored hourly by Maintenance when the temporary heaters are in service, and removed when weather conditions permit. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-007) D. Deficiency Report (Use-As-Is) | - The 11, 12, 13 and 14 GB4 Valve actuator diaphragms may have reduced reliability due to a manufacturing defect with the actuators and a procedure error. The manufacturing error results in the diaphragm being compressed in the area of the bolt circle which may result in the diaphragm tearing. The procedure error addresses the torque value specified in procedure SC.IC-PM.ZZ-0003(Q) and results in the actuator lid bolting being torqued to a value double that recommended by the vendor. This may aggravate the manufacturing defect in tearing the diaphragms along the bolt circle. The GB-4 valves are air operated valves. | ||
SMD 94-009 "Operability of the 11, 12, 13 and 14 GB4 Valves" -The 11, 12, 13 and 14 GB4 Valve actuator diaphragms may have reduced reliability due to a manufacturing defect with the actuators and a procedure error. The manufacturing error results in the diaphragm being compressed in the area of the bolt circle which may result in the diaphragm tearing. The procedure error addresses the torque value specified in procedure SC.IC-PM.ZZ-0003(Q) and results in the actuator lid bolting being torqued to a value double that recommended by the vendor. This may aggravate the manufacturing defect in tearing the diaphragms along the bolt circle. The GB-4 valves are air operated valves. The valves provide containment isolation for the Steam Generator Blowdown System. A diaphragm failure of this type will result in a tear along the bolt hole circle where the actuator lids and diaphragm are bolted together. | The valves provide containment isolation for the Steam Generator Blowdown System. A diaphragm failure of this type will result in a tear along the bolt hole circle where the actuator lids and diaphragm are bolted together. This would result in the valve being unable to maintain an open position and would result in the valve closing. | ||
This would result in the valve being unable to maintain an open position and would result in the valve closing. Since the valve is a spring assist to close valve and valve closure is based on the spring assist 109FR50 .* 59 EVALUATIO,, MONTH: -JANUARY 1994 | Since the valve is a spring assist to close valve and valve closure is based on the spring assist | ||
109FR50.* 59 EVALUATIO,, DOCK. NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JANUARY 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 (cont'd) | |||
ITEM | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
and evacuation of air from under the actuator diaphragm, the safety function of the valve to close is not affected. | and evacuation of air from under the actuator diaphragm, the safety function of the valve to close is not affected. Loss of blowdown, in itself, is not a concern and is governed by chemistry concerns if blowdown is unavailable for long periods of time. The Technical Specification requirements for the GB-4 valves are to provide containment isolation. The failure of the diaphragm valve will result in the valve failing closed. The ability to satisfy the Technical Specification requirements is not affected during the time that the diaphragm fails since the ability of the valve to close is based on the spring assist and actuator air evacuation from under the diaphragm. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-008) | ||
Loss of blowdown, in itself, is not a concern and is governed by chemistry concerns if blowdown is unavailable for long periods of time. The Technical Specification requirements for the GB-4 valves are to provide containment isolation. | |||
The failure of the diaphragm valve will result in the valve failing closed. The ability to satisfy the Technical Specification requirements is not affected during the time that the diaphragm fails since the ability of the valve to close is based on the spring assist and actuator air evacuation from under the diaphragm. | SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING | ||
There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-008) | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
-UNIT 1 JANUARY 1994 The Unit began the period shutdown for the eleventh refueling outage. The Unit entered Mode 2 "Hot Standby" on January 24, 1994. Low Power Physics Tests were completed on January 25, 1994 and preparations for increasing power to Mode 1, "Power Operation" were performed. | - UNIT 1 JANUARY 1994 SALEM UNIT NO. 1 The Unit began the period shutdown for the eleventh refueling outage. | ||
A Reactor Trip occurred on January 27, 1994, due to Lo-Lo Level in #14 Steam Generator. | The Unit entered Mode 2 "Hot Standby" on January 24, 1994. Low Power Physics Tests were completed on January 25, 1994 and preparations for increasing power to Mode 1, "Power Operation" were performed. A Reactor Trip occurred on January 27, 1994, due to Lo-Lo Level in #14 Steam Generator. The reactor achieved criticality on January 30, 1994, and preparation for increasing power continued throughout the remainder of the period. | ||
The reactor achieved criticality on January 30, 1994, and preparation for increasing power continued throughout the remainder of the period. | |||
RE~UELING INFORMATION~ DOCK.NO: | |||
: 1. Refueling information has changed from last month: YES X NO 2. Scheduled date for next refueling: | UNIT NAME: | ||
MARCH 4, 1995 | 50-272 MONTH: - JANUARY 1994 SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 MONTH JANUARY 1994 | ||
: 3. Scheduled date for restart following refueling: | : 1. Refueling information has changed from last month: | ||
MAY 2. 1995 4. a) Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?: | YES X NO | ||
YES NO NOT DETERMINED TO DATE X b) Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?: | : 2. Scheduled date for next refueling: MARCH 4, 1995 | ||
YES NO X If no, when is it scheduled?: | : 3. Scheduled date for restart following refueling: MAY 2. 1995 | ||
MARCH 1995 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: N/A 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | : 4. a) Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?: | ||
YES NO NOT DETERMINED TO DATE X b) Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?: | |||
YES NO X If no, when is it scheduled?: MARCH 1995 | |||
: 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action: | |||
N/A | |||
: 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling: | |||
: 7. Number of Fuel Assemblies: | : 7. Number of Fuel Assemblies: | ||
: a. Incore 193 b. In Spent Fuel Storage 732 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: | : a. Incore 193 | ||
1170 Future spent fuel storage capacity: | : b. In Spent Fuel Storage 732 | ||
: 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: 1170 Future spent fuel storage capacity: 1170 | |||
September 2001 8-1-7.R4}} | : 9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: September 2001 8-1-7.R4}} |
Revision as of 10:32, 21 October 2019
ML18100A874 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem ![]() |
Issue date: | 01/31/1994 |
From: | Hagan J, Heller R, Morroni M Public Service Enterprise Group |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
NUDOCS 9402180104 | |
Download: ML18100A874 (11) | |
Text
Public*Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station February 14, 1994 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Dear Sir:
MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT SALEM NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-272 In compliance with Section 6.9.1.6, Reporting Requirements for the Salem Technical Specifications, the original copy of the monthly operating reports for the month of January 1994 are being sent to you.
Average Daily Unit Power Level Operating Data Report Unit Shutdowns and Power Reductions Safety Related Maintenance 10CFR50.59 Evaluations Operating Summary Refueling Information Sincerely yours, ager -
tions RH:pc cc: Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator USNRC Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19046 Enclosures 8-1-7.R4 The Energy People ______ - - ----- ----- -- -, ----.....
0p*~~21 ~g5g~ 6~86~~72 1 PDR 95-2189 (10M) 12-89 R --~*~~-*-;;;:.
~VERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER L~L Docket No.: 50-272 Unit Name: Salem #1 Date: 02/10/94 Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone: 339-2122 Month January 1994 Day Average Daily Power Level Day Average Daily Power Level (MWe-NET) (MWe-NET) 1 0 17 0 2 0 18 0 3 0 19 0 4 0 20 0 5 0 21 0 6 0 22 0 7 0 23 0 8 0 24 0 9 0 25 0 10 0 26 0 11 0 27 0 12 0 28 0 13 0 29 0 14 0 30 0 15 0 31 0 16 0 P. 8.1-7 Rl
e OPERATING DATA REPORT e Docket No: 50-272 Date: 02/10/94 Completed by: Mike Morroni Telephone: 339-2122 Operating Status
- 1. Unit Name Salem No. 1 Notes
- 2. Reporting Period January 1994
- 3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt) 3411
- 4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe) 1170
- 5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe) 1115
- 6. Maximum Dependable capacity(Gross MWe) 1149
- 7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe) 1106
- 8. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (items 3 through 7) since Last Report, Give Reason NA
- 9. Power Level to Which Restricted, if any (Net MWe) NIA
- 10. Reasons for Restrictions, if any N/A This Month Year to Date Cumulative
- 12. Hours in Reporting Period 744 744 145441
- 12. No. of Hrs. Rx. was Critical 118.2 118.2 95250.17
- 13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hrs. 0 0 0
- 14. Hours Generator On-Line 0 0 91887.84
- 15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0 0 0
- 16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 6895.2 6895.2 290779209.2
- 17. Gross Elec. Energy Generated (MWH) 0 0 96535970
- 18. Net Elec. Energy Gen. (MWH) -17717 -17717 91919836
- 19. Unit Service Factor 0 0 63.2
- 20. Unit Availability Factor 0 0 63.2
- 21. Unit Capacity Factor (using MDC Net) 0 0 57.1
- 22. Unit Capacity Factor (using DER Net) 0 0 56.7
- 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 0 0 21.0
- 24. Shutdowns scheduled over next 6 months (type, date and duration of each)
None.
- 25. If shutdown at end of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup:
Unit returned to service on 2/2/94.
8-1-7.R2
UNIT SHUTDOWN AND POWER REDUCTIONS REPORT MONTH JANUARY 1994 DOCKET NO. :_,5'"-"0;..,-*=27'-=2..,,..,.__ __
UNIT NAME: Salem #1 DATE: 02-08-94 COMPLETED BY: Mike Morroni TELEPHONE: 339-2122 METHOD OF SHUTTING LICENSE DURATION DOWN EVENT SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 1 2 NO. DATE TYPE (HOURS) REASON REACTOR REPORT # CODE 4 CODE 5 TO PREVENT RECURRENCE 0135 01/01/94 s 744 c 4 ----------- RC FUELXX NUCLEAR NORMAL REFUELING
--
1 2 3 4 5 F: Forced Reason Method: Exhibit G - Instructions Exhibit 1 - same S: Scheduled A-Equipment Failure (explain) 1-Manual for Preparation of Data Source B-Maintenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Licensee C-Refueling 3-Automatic Scram Event Report CLER) File D-Requlatory Restriction 4-Continuation of (NUREG-0161)
E-Operator Training & License Examination Previous Outage F-Administrative 5-Load Reduction G-Operational Error (Explain) 9-0ther H-Other (Explain)
-
SA.~ETY -RELATED MAINT,ANCE MdNTH: - JANUARY 1994 DOCK' NO:
UNIT NAME:
50-272 SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162
WO NO UNIT EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION 931116130 1 VALVE 12MS15 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: PLUG THREADS INSIDE BODY DAMAGED DURING REMOVAL - REPLACE 931214109 1 SOLID STATE PROTECTION SYSTEM TRAIN "A" FAILURE DESCRIPTION: OUTPUT TEST READS LOW -
INVESTIGATE 931214205 1 11 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: MOTOR SLINGER NOT SLINGING -
INVESTIGATE 931229159 1 13 REACTOR COOLANT LOOP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: FLOW CHANNEL 2 READS 18% WITH NO LOOP FLOW - INVESTIGATE 940103180 1 12 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP FAILURE DESCRIPTION: ERRONEOUS INDICATION -
INVESTIGATE 940110247 1 VALVE 13SJ54 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE OFF NORMAL INDICATION DID NOT CLEAR - INVESTIGATE 940117073 1 VALVE 12MS10 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE FAILED TO FULLY CLOSE -
TROUBLESHOOT 940122099 1 VALVE 11BF40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE POSITION WILL NOT REACH 10'0% OPEN, IT WILL ONLY REACH 95%
- INVESTIGATE 940122100 1 VALVE 13BF40 FAILURE DESCRIPTION: VALVE DOES NOT REACH THE OPEN LIMIT - REWORK
\'
\
10,CFR.50. 59 EVALUATIOI DOCK' NO: 50-272 MdNTH: - JANUARY 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 The following items were evaluated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50.59. The Station Operations Review Committee has reviewed and concurs with these evaluations.
ITEM
SUMMARY
A. Design Change Packages lEC-3208 Pkg 2 11 .salem Fire Damper Upgrade" - The design scope for this package includes the replacement, relocation and/or modification of existing fire dampers of Unit l's Auxiliary Building Ventilation (ABV)
Containment Purge System. The function, basic configuration and operation of the system will not be altered and the codes, standards, qualification and design criteria of the original system will apply. Fire dampers lABF-016 and lABF-024 will be modified in place in accordance with the results of the manufacturer's (PREFCO) fire test report recommendations to obtain a 1.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> fire rating.
The existing fire protective coating will not be necessary, and later replaced to facilitate damper modification. Fire dampers lABF-222 and lABF-228 will be replaced with new Ruskin 1.5 hour5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> rated fire damper and moved into the fire barrier, eliminating the need for existing fire protective coatings. The reason for this change is to abide by the PSE&G commitment to the NRC and compliance with the requirements to 10CFR50, Appendix R. The margin of safety is not reduced because we are merely enhancing the Fire Protection System to meet the criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix "R". These modifications will not reduce the margin of safety for the Auxiliary Building Ventilation System or the Fire Protection System. (SORC 94-008)
10~FR50.59 EVALUATIO' MdNTH: - JANUARY 19~4 DOCK' NO:
UNIT NAME:
50-272 SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 (cont'd)
ITEM
SUMMARY
B. Procedures and Revisions NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0027(Q) "Inservice Inspection Program" - The revision summary is as follows:
1.) This is a Limited Revision; 2.) The following technical changes was made at Step 5.4: Deleted requirement for SORC review of ISI program submittals to the NRC; 3.) The following minor, editorial changes were made to reflect the recent organization changes: a.) Changed "Nuclear Services" to "Nuclear Support and Services; b.) Changed "Site Services" to "Reliability and Assessment."; c.) Added "Manager Planning and Scheduling (Salem only)", and d.) Step 5.7.2: Changed history file location.
4.) Procedure was reformatted to comply with requirements of NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0032(Q) and NC.NA-AS.ZZ-0001.
5.) Revision bars were not used for typographical errors.
6.) This revision meets the biennial review requirements of NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0032(Q).
The Salem and Hope Creek Technical Specifications were reviewed, including Sections 4.0 and 6.0.
The Technical Specification review did not uncover any inconsistencies with this procedure revision.
Therefore, the proposal can not change the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-008)
10.c;,:FRSO ... 59. EVALUATION' DOCK.NO: 50-272 M~NTH: - JANUARY 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 (cont'd)
ITEM
SUMMARY
- c. Temporary Modifications T-Mod 94-006 "Installation of Temporary Space Heaters" - This T-Mod will provide additional necessary heating to the Unit 1 Auxiliary Feedwater Storage Tank and Refueling Water Storage Tank level instrumentation lines to prevent these instrument and sample lines from freezing. The T-Mod will install a temporary enclosure heated by space heaters. The temporary enclosure will be constructed of scaffold material enclosed by Herculite. The existing heat trace system is not adequate for the present cold spell at Salem Station. This T-Mod will be monitored hourly by Maintenance when the temporary heaters are in service, and removed when weather conditions permit. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-007)
D. Deficiency Report (Use-As-Is)
SMD 94-009 "Operability of the 11, 12, 13 and 14 GB4 Valves"
- The 11, 12, 13 and 14 GB4 Valve actuator diaphragms may have reduced reliability due to a manufacturing defect with the actuators and a procedure error. The manufacturing error results in the diaphragm being compressed in the area of the bolt circle which may result in the diaphragm tearing. The procedure error addresses the torque value specified in procedure SC.IC-PM.ZZ-0003(Q) and results in the actuator lid bolting being torqued to a value double that recommended by the vendor. This may aggravate the manufacturing defect in tearing the diaphragms along the bolt circle. The GB-4 valves are air operated valves.
The valves provide containment isolation for the Steam Generator Blowdown System. A diaphragm failure of this type will result in a tear along the bolt hole circle where the actuator lids and diaphragm are bolted together. This would result in the valve being unable to maintain an open position and would result in the valve closing.
Since the valve is a spring assist to close valve and valve closure is based on the spring assist
109FR50.* 59 EVALUATIO,, DOCK. NO: 50-272 MONTH: - JANUARY 1994 UNIT NAME: SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 (cont'd)
ITEM
SUMMARY
and evacuation of air from under the actuator diaphragm, the safety function of the valve to close is not affected. Loss of blowdown, in itself, is not a concern and is governed by chemistry concerns if blowdown is unavailable for long periods of time. The Technical Specification requirements for the GB-4 valves are to provide containment isolation. The failure of the diaphragm valve will result in the valve failing closed. The ability to satisfy the Technical Specification requirements is not affected during the time that the diaphragm fails since the ability of the valve to close is based on the spring assist and actuator air evacuation from under the diaphragm. There is no reduction in the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification. (SORC 94-008)
SALEM GENERATING STATION MONTHLY OPERATING
SUMMARY
- UNIT 1 JANUARY 1994 SALEM UNIT NO. 1 The Unit began the period shutdown for the eleventh refueling outage.
The Unit entered Mode 2 "Hot Standby" on January 24, 1994. Low Power Physics Tests were completed on January 25, 1994 and preparations for increasing power to Mode 1, "Power Operation" were performed. A Reactor Trip occurred on January 27, 1994, due to Lo-Lo Level in #14 Steam Generator. The reactor achieved criticality on January 30, 1994, and preparation for increasing power continued throughout the remainder of the period.
RE~UELING INFORMATION~ DOCK.NO:
UNIT NAME:
50-272 MONTH: - JANUARY 1994 SALEM 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 COMPLETED BY: R. HELLER TELEPHONE: (609)339-5162 MONTH JANUARY 1994
- 1. Refueling information has changed from last month:
YES X NO
- 2. Scheduled date for next refueling: MARCH 4, 1995
- 3. Scheduled date for restart following refueling: MAY 2. 1995
- 4. a) Will Technical Specification changes or other license amendments be required?:
YES NO NOT DETERMINED TO DATE X b) Has the reload fuel design been reviewed by the Station Operating Review Committee?:
YES NO X If no, when is it scheduled?: MARCH 1995
- 5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action:
N/A
- 6. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling:
- 7. Number of Fuel Assemblies:
- a. Incore 193
- b. In Spent Fuel Storage 732
- 8. Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity: 1170 Future spent fuel storage capacity: 1170
- 9. Date of last refueling that can be discharged to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity: September 2001 8-1-7.R4