ML18192C062: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PVNGS-1,2&3 ER COOLING SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES Table 10.1-9 BASIC TABULATION TO BE USED IN COMPARING ALTERNATIVE PLANT SYSTEMS (Sheet 6 of 7)Alternatives Rectangular Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower System Round Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower System Wet-Dry Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower System Fan-Assisted Natural Draft Cooling Tower System Environmental Costs 4.3.2 People (esthetics)
{{#Wiki_filter:PVNGS-1,2&3 ER COOLING SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES Table 10.1-9 BASIC TABULATION TO BE USED IN COMPARING ALTERNATIVE PLANT SYSTEMS (Sheet 6 of 7)
Units Comparative visual prominence of towers Comparative prominence of visible plume Magnitude Base Base Reference 10.1.4.5.3.2 5.1.5.7.3 Magnitude Slightly less than the selected system Approximately the same as for the selected system Reference 10.1.4.5.3.2 5.1.5.7.3 Magnitude Slightly higher than the selected system Lower than the selected system Reference 10.1.4.5.3.2 5.1.5.7.3 Magnitude More pronounced than the selected system Higher than the selected system Reference 10.1.4.5.3.2 5.1.5.7.3 4.3.3 Wildlife Comparative loss of vegetation and wild-life habitat Low 5.1.5.2.3 10.1.4.5.3.3 Low 10.1.4.5.3.3 Low 10.1.4.5.3.3 Comparative hazard of cooling tower struc-tures to migratory birds Base 5.1.5.2.3 Slightly higher than the selected system 10.1.4.5.3.3 Higher than the selected system 10.1.4.5.3.3 Significantly higher than the selected system 10.1.4.5.3.3 4.3.4 Land, flood control No implications No implications No implications No implications 4.4 Salts discharged from cooling towers 4.4.1 People Maximum so 1 ids depos i-tion (lb/ft/yr)0.01 (Negligible impact on ground water)10.1.4.5.4 0.02 (Negligible impact on ground water)10.1.4.5.4 2.3 x 10 (Negligible impact on ground water)10.1.4.5.4 1.1 x 10 4 (Negligible impact on groun water)10.1.4.5.4 4.4.2 Plants and animals Acres receiving solids in excess of 50 lb/acre/yr See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 4.4.3 Property resrouces Statement Insignificant 10.1.4.5.4.4 Insignificant 10.1.4.5.4.4 Insignificant 10.1.4.5.4.4 Insignificant 10.1.4.5.4.4 10.1-41/10.1-42 (Blank)}}
Alternatives Rectangular Mechanical Draft       Round Mechanical Draft           Wet-Dry Mechanical Draft       Fan-Assisted Natural Draft Cooling Tower System            Cooling Tower System                Cooling Tower System            Cooling Tower System Environmental Costs               Units                Magnitude      Reference      Magnitude      Reference          Magnitude      Reference      Magnitude          Reference 4.3.2   People       Comparative visual       Base               10.1.4.5.3.2 Slightly less      10.1.4.5.3.Slightly higher    10.1.4.5.3.2 More pronounced      10.1.4.5.3.2 (esthetics)  prominence of towers                                      than the                          than the                        than the selected system                   selected system                  selected system Comparative prominence    Base              5.1.5.7.3   Approximately      5.1.5.7.3     Lower than the     5.1.5.7.3   Higher than the      5.1.5.7.3 of visible  plume                                        the same as for                  selected system                  selected system the selected system 4.3.3   Wildlife     Comparative loss of       Low               5.1.5.2.3                       10.1.4.5.3.3   Low                 10.1.4.5.3.3 Low                   10.1.4.5.3.3 vegetation and  wild-life habitat Comparative hazard of     Base               5.1.5.2.3   Slightly higher   10.1.4.5.3.3   Higher than the     10.1.4.5.3.3 Significantly         10.1.4.5.3.3 cooling tower struc-                                      than the                          selected system                  higher than the tures to migratory                                        selected system                                                    selected system birds
: 4. 3. 4 Land, flood                           No implications               No implications                 No   implications               No implications control 4.4 Salts discharged from cooling towers 4.4.1 People         Maximum so 1 ids depos i- 0.01               10.1.4.5.4   0.02               10.1.4.5.4     2.3 x 10           10.1.4.5.4   1.1 x 10 4 (Negligible 10.1.4.5.4 tion (lb/ft /yr)          (Negligible                    (Negligible                      (Negligible impact on groun impact on ground                impact on ground                  impact on ground water)                          water)                            water)                          water) 4.4.2   Plants and   Acres receiving solids   See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3   See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 See   table 10.1.8   10.1.4.5.4.3 animals      in excess of 50 lb/
acre/yr 4.4.3   Property     Statement                 Insignificant     10.1.4.5.4.4 Insignificant     10.1.4.5.4.4   Insignificant     10.1.4.5.4.4 Insignificant       10.1.4.5.4.4 resrouces 10.1-41/10.1-42   (Blank)}}

Latest revision as of 20:34, 20 October 2019

Table 10.1-9, Cooling System Alternatives, Basic Tabulation to Be Used in Comparing Alternative Plant Systems (Sheet 6 of 7).
ML18192C062
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/2018
From:
Arizona Public Service Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
10.1-9
Download: ML18192C062 (1)


Text

PVNGS-1,2&3 ER COOLING SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES Table 10.1-9 BASIC TABULATION TO BE USED IN COMPARING ALTERNATIVE PLANT SYSTEMS (Sheet 6 of 7)

Alternatives Rectangular Mechanical Draft Round Mechanical Draft Wet-Dry Mechanical Draft Fan-Assisted Natural Draft Cooling Tower System Cooling Tower System Cooling Tower System Cooling Tower System Environmental Costs Units Magnitude Reference Magnitude Reference Magnitude Reference Magnitude Reference 4.3.2 People Comparative visual Base 10.1.4.5.3.2 Slightly less 10.1.4.5.3.2 Slightly higher 10.1.4.5.3.2 More pronounced 10.1.4.5.3.2 (esthetics) prominence of towers than the than the than the selected system selected system selected system Comparative prominence Base 5.1.5.7.3 Approximately 5.1.5.7.3 Lower than the 5.1.5.7.3 Higher than the 5.1.5.7.3 of visible plume the same as for selected system selected system the selected system 4.3.3 Wildlife Comparative loss of Low 5.1.5.2.3 10.1.4.5.3.3 Low 10.1.4.5.3.3 Low 10.1.4.5.3.3 vegetation and wild-life habitat Comparative hazard of Base 5.1.5.2.3 Slightly higher 10.1.4.5.3.3 Higher than the 10.1.4.5.3.3 Significantly 10.1.4.5.3.3 cooling tower struc- than the selected system higher than the tures to migratory selected system selected system birds

4. 3. 4 Land, flood No implications No implications No implications No implications control 4.4 Salts discharged from cooling towers 4.4.1 People Maximum so 1 ids depos i- 0.01 10.1.4.5.4 0.02 10.1.4.5.4 2.3 x 10 10.1.4.5.4 1.1 x 10 4 (Negligible 10.1.4.5.4 tion (lb/ft /yr) (Negligible (Negligible (Negligible impact on groun impact on ground impact on ground impact on ground water) water) water) water) 4.4.2 Plants and Acres receiving solids See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 See table 10.1.8 10.1.4.5.4.3 animals in excess of 50 lb/

acre/yr 4.4.3 Property Statement Insignificant 10.1.4.5.4.4 Insignificant 10.1.4.5.4.4 Insignificant 10.1.4.5.4.4 Insignificant 10.1.4.5.4.4 resrouces 10.1-41/10.1-42 (Blank)