ML101720456: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 29: Line 29:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NRC staff responses to 3 petitions in Y'i proceeding J ~essaot' -.Sta~t Answer South Carolina Intervention Petition.pdl 133 KB, iý ~ Staff Answher Washington Intervention Petition.pdf  
NRC staff responses to 3 petitions in Y'i proceeding J ~essaot' -.Sta~t Answer South Carolina Intervention Petition.pdl 133 KB, iý ~ Staff Answher Washington Intervention Petition.pdf
:16 KBI I )Staf Answer Aiken Countylotervention PetitionPdlf 224 KB)i Attached are the three filings from the NRC staff in response to the WA. SC, and Aiken County petitions to intervene.
:16 KBI I )Staf Answer Aiken Countylotervention PetitionPdlf 224 KB)i Attached are the three filings from the NRC staff in response to the WA. SC, and Aiken County petitions to intervene.
The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition In shorto the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State. local governmental body. and affected.
The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition In shorto the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State. local governmental body. and affected.

Revision as of 01:41, 1 May 2019

E- Mail from Amy Powell to Mcdonough, Alexander (Reid); Cristinzio, Dayle (Reid), and Sharon Raborn (Reid) NRC Staff Responses to 3 Petitions in Ym Proceeding (Attachments: ML100880539, ML100880570 and ML100880557)
ML101720456
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island, 06300001  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/30/2010
From: Amy Powell
Office of Congressional Affairs
To: Amy Powell
Office of Congressional Affairs
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0199
Download: ML101720456 (2)


Text

-1 " ., , _', ;SRep" Reply Forward fD-elete o etýo 'reat From: Powell,'Amy To: PoweU, Amy, Related Other.. Bock !LD CJeo' POllon Maw as 0 ele Ac n-s eo Up Jo'ea d 'I et Sent: Tue 3i30/2010 6:17 PIl Cc:*Bcc'aete.modaff.mailhouse.gov:;

'aes, e ~r.ailhouse~go':

Cones, Kevin 'Approps)';

Blair, Ro'; 'D6ug Clappýappro,sena'egov';

'Carrie Aostolou';

'Spencer, Peter': 'Caputo, Anne (EPWY; 'Dedrick, Kathy 'P'P,; 'Biscon, Giulia (Carper)';

'Haynes, Laura (Carper)';

Freedhoff, Michal' 'atthew,'s, Kate'; 'Spring, Andrea', Neumayr, Ma'y; 'Baron, Jeff: 'Cherry, Dai'; 'cDonouqh, Alexander ,e.y: 'Crsinz., Oayle tReioY, 'Story, Tod'; 'grogfacchiaiooinail house gov': JohIn 'ivenoign oe'atego ':'matt.mortisemail ,housegov','Sha',. Andrer(Eosgo)';

'Consolvo, B'andon '"nsign)'" 'Shar'on R1abornredlsenateigov':

'Agostisi, Karen'; 'Fovier, Sam (nerg'iv; vh'valenhire-energysenate.go.';

+/-1

Subject:

NRC staff responses to 3 petitions in Y'i proceeding J ~essaot' -.Sta~t Answer South Carolina Intervention Petition.pdl 133 KB, iý ~ Staff Answher Washington Intervention Petition.pdf

16 KBI I )Staf Answer Aiken Countylotervention PetitionPdlf 224 KB)i Attached are the three filings from the NRC staff in response to the WA. SC, and Aiken County petitions to intervene.

The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition In shorto the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State. local governmental body. and affected.

Federally-recognized Indian Tribe" without standing or admissable contention.

The presiding officer (in this case. the lead judge) makes the call to admit interested governmental participants.

Here is a link to the full section of regulation on this option: hhttpYwwv, nrc qovireadinI-rm.,'doc.collectionstcfr:part002ipanrtO2.031 5.htmi (c) is the relevant subsection.

To wrap up on this three volume set of e-mail. WA. SC. and Aiken County now have 10 days to reply to the parties' responses Parties who have not yet responded to NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community's petitions have until April 9th to do so*.. "r I'Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office 6f Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 A

Powell, Amy From: Powell, Amy Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 6:17 PM To: Powell, Amy

Subject:

NRC staff responses to 3 petitions in YM proceeding Attachments:

Staff Answer South Carolina Intervention Petition.pdf; Staff Answer Washington Intervention Petition.pdf; Staff Answer Aiken County Intervention Petition.pdf Attached are the three filings from the NRC staff in response to the WA, SC, and Aiken County petitions to intervene.

The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition.

In short, the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants.

This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State, local governmental body, and affected, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe" without standing or admissable contention.

The presiding officer (in this case, the lead judge) makes the call to admit interested governmental participants.

Here is a link to the full section of regulation on this option: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part002/partOO2-0315.html (c) is the relevant subsection.

To wrap up on this three volume set of e-mail, WA, SC, and Aiken County now have 10 days to reply to the parties' responses.

Parties who have not yet responded to NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community's petitions have until April 9th to do so.Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1