|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:}} | | {{#Wiki_filter:4/28/10 Muring"te j iter"s were uist;u5suo at ummuma %,vuTuTrrcnmn mcwting tside oT Scope SALEM ONE Weekend Coverage: |
| | AL =(9X)>O.07 AL2=(2of3)>O. |
| | 11 AL3=(1X)>013. |
| | Outside of Scope AFW follow-up issues Verify hydro/pressure test is code compliant |
| | -O'Hara, determined approach was acceptable, received test records but still needs to verify test results. PSEG will also provide the leak check procedure 4127 am.* Evaluate the 50.59 for AFW modifications |
| | -O'Hara, received 4/27* Smart samples o Verify repairs to the control air system elbow that was replaced (how will PSEG certify the repair) -O'Hara, PSEG adding more detail to description of document, to provide by 4/27 PM o Verify control air extent of condition |
| | -O'Hara o Backfill procedure reviews to verify coating and backfill cure times -O'Hara, PSEG to provide by 4/27 pm o Verify control air clamping material -O'Hara, PSEG to provide supporting document 4/27 am co AFW pipe weld records -O'Hara, PSEG to assess status of documents by 4/27 pm Outside of Scope ftnatn ttc Inr* reom was delleW n in......,-s M . |
| | Dutside of Scope Unit 2AFW Testing -PSEG determined that they did not perform ASME code required pressure drop test for the buried sections of the 22 and 24 headers.* C0nfirm the PSEG'risk assessment to delay. AFW.test.ing for 1yearT is reasonable |
| | -Cahill; complete, no concerns* Evaluate if performing a risk assessmentti t eet TechniclSpeciIficatiion4.0,5 is'appropriate if a test was never performed verses missed -Conte/Ennis, follow-up with T/S branch regarding TIA and precedent |
| | -discussions ongoing Operability |
| | -Initial assessment Unit 2 was that it is in better condition based on newer piping; 1994 inspection that identified intact coating; and ISI code gives more allowance to an operating unit (can take credit for up to 90% of the yield stress)." Evaluate the Unit 2 AFW extent of condition operability assessment |
| | -Schroeder/O'Hara operability determination received 4127* Confirm the finite element analysis for the Unit 1 as found condition is acceptable including the use of appropriate methodsand assumptions |
| | -Gray and O'Hara reviewed and did not identify any concerns; HQ review in pr~ogress n I Dutside of Scope: AdditionallItems t Status Board Items:* Salem 1, AFW buried piping -modifications and testing* Salem 2, (PRIORITY) |
| | -T/S risk assessment for AFW~testingý operability determination I |
| | Outside of Scop. |
| | Outside of Scope |
| | [outsidae of Scope}} |
Revision as of 03:38, 19 September 2018
Similar Documents at Salem |
|---|
Category:Status Report
MONTHYEARLR-N24-0020, Generation Station and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 & 2 - Annual Property Insurance Status Report2024-03-0707 March 2024
Generation Station and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 & 2 - Annual Property Insurance Status Report
ML22076A0502022-03-17017 March 2022
and Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Annual Property Insurance Status Report
LR-N21-0015, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations2021-03-25025 March 2021
Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations
LR-N19-0014, Stations - Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations2019-03-25025 March 2019
Stations - Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations
LR-N18-0041, Annual Property Insurance Status Report2018-04-0505 April 2018
Annual Property Insurance Status Report
RS-17-045, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations2017-03-30030 March 2017
Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations
LR-N17-0043, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations2017-03-29029 March 2017
Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations
LR-N17-0041, Annual Property Insurance Status Report2017-03-24024 March 2017
Annual Property Insurance Status Report
LR-N16-0043, Sixth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2016-02-29029 February 2016
Sixth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)
NL-15-1620, Fifth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2015-08-26026 August 2015
Fifth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)
LR-N15-0167, PSEG Nuclear Llc'S Fifth Six-Month Status Report for the Salem Generating Station in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA2015-08-26026 August 2015
PSEG Nuclear Llc'S Fifth Six-Month Status Report for the Salem Generating Station in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12
ML15089A4262015-03-30030 March 2015
Annual Property Insurance Status Report
LR-N15-0048, Salem, Units 1 and 2, Hope Creek - Annual Property Insurance Status Report2015-03-30030 March 2015
Salem, Units 1 and 2, Hope Creek - Annual Property Insurance Status Report
LR-N15-0023, Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order No. EA-12-049)2015-02-18018 February 2015
Fourth Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order No. EA-12-049)
ML15051A2702015-02-18018 February 2015
PSEG Nuclear Llc'S Fourth Six-Month Status Report for the Salem Generating Station in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-1
ML15030A2502014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 8,Salem Generating Station Hydrogeologic Cross Section D-D'
ML15030A2492014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 7, Salem Generating Station Hydrogeologic Cross Section C-C'
ML15030A2482014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 6, Salem Generating Station Hydrogeologic Cross Section B-B'
ML15030A2462014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 4, Station Shallow Groundwater Elevation Contours - February 2014
ML15030A2452014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 3, Salem Generating Station Layout Map
ML15030A2442014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 2, Station Layout Map
ML15030A2432014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 1, Site Location Map
ML15030A2422014-09-22022 September 2014
Appendix a, Mass Flux Calculations
ML15030A1632014-09-22022 September 2014
Remedial Action Progress Report First Quarter 2014
ML15030A2472014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 5, Salem Generating Station Hydrogeologic Cross Section A-A'
ML15030A2752014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 10, Precipitation Measurements
ML15030A2952014-09-22022 September 2014
Table 04, Groundwater Measurements and Elevations - First Quarter 2014
ML15030A2962014-09-22022 September 2014
Table 05, Groundwater Analytical Results (1.22.2003 Through 3.31.2014)
ML15030A2982014-09-22022 September 2014
Table 06A, Groundwater Tritium Analytical Results for Well AC
ML15030A2992014-09-22022 September 2014
Table 06B, Groundwater Analytical Results for Well AC
ML15030A3002014-09-22022 September 2014
Table 07, Unit 1 Seismic Gap Drain Tritium Analytical Results
ML15030A3012014-09-22022 September 2014
Table 08, Unit 2 Seismic Gap Drain Tritium Analytical Results
ML15030A2512014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 9, Salem Generating Station Hydrogeologic Cross Section E-E'
ML15030A2942014-09-22022 September 2014
Table 03, Effluent Data Tritium Activity
ML15030A2842014-09-22022 September 2014
Table 02, Sample Collection Schedule - First & Second Quarter 2014
ML15030A2832014-09-22022 September 2014
Table 01, Well Construction Details
ML15030A2822014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 16, Salem Unit 2 - Tritium Concentrations in Water Recovered Through Seismic Gap Drain Operation
ML15030A2812014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 15, Salem Unit 1 - Tritium Concentrations in Water Recovered Through Seismic Gap Drain Operation
ML15030A2802014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 14, Historic Tritium Recovered Through Well Field Operation
ML15030A2792014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 13, Tritium Isoconcentration Map - March 2014
ML15030A2762014-09-22022 September 2014
Figure 11, Station Wind Summary - Q1 2014
LR-N14-0187, Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2014-08-26026 August 2014
Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)
LR-N14-0033, PSEG Nuclear Llc'S Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Order Number EA-12-051)2014-02-25025 February 2014
PSEG Nuclear Llc'S Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Order Number EA-12-051)
LR-N14-0027, PSEG Nuclear Llc'S Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order No. EA-12-049)2014-02-25025 February 2014
PSEG Nuclear Llc'S Second Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order No. EA-12-049)
LR-N13-0175, PSEG Nuclear Llc'S First Six-Month Status Report for the Salem in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order No. EA-2013-08-25025 August 2013
PSEG Nuclear Llc'S First Six-Month Status Report for the Salem in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order No. EA-12-
LR-N13-0176, PSEG Nuclear Llc'S First Six-Month Status Report for Salem in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order No. EA-12-051)2013-08-25025 August 2013
PSEG Nuclear Llc'S First Six-Month Status Report for Salem in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order No. EA-12-051)
RS-13-100, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors2013-04-0101 April 2013
Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors
LR-N13-0059, NRC Decommissioning Funding Status Report2013-03-26026 March 2013
NRC Decommissioning Funding Status Report
LR-N12-0329, PSEG Nuclear Llc'S Initial Status Report in Response to March 12,2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (EA-12-049)2012-10-31031 October 2012
PSEG Nuclear Llc'S Initial Status Report in Response to March 12,2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (EA-12-049)
LR-N12-0331, Initial Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)2012-10-31031 October 2012
Initial Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)
2024-03-07
[Table view] |
Text
4/28/10 Muring"te j iter"s were uist;u5suo at ummuma %,vuTuTrrcnmn mcwting tside oT Scope SALEM ONE Weekend Coverage:
AL =(9X)>O.07 AL2=(2of3)>O.
11 AL3=(1X)>013.
Outside of Scope AFW follow-up issues Verify hydro/pressure test is code compliant
-O'Hara, determined approach was acceptable, received test records but still needs to verify test results. PSEG will also provide the leak check procedure 4127 am.* Evaluate the 50.59 for AFW modifications
-O'Hara, received 4/27* Smart samples o Verify repairs to the control air system elbow that was replaced (how will PSEG certify the repair) -O'Hara, PSEG adding more detail to description of document, to provide by 4/27 PM o Verify control air extent of condition
-O'Hara o Backfill procedure reviews to verify coating and backfill cure times -O'Hara, PSEG to provide by 4/27 pm o Verify control air clamping material -O'Hara, PSEG to provide supporting document 4/27 am co AFW pipe weld records -O'Hara, PSEG to assess status of documents by 4/27 pm Outside of Scope ftnatn ttc Inr* reom was delleW n in......,-s M .
Dutside of Scope Unit 2AFW Testing -PSEG determined that they did not perform ASME code required pressure drop test for the buried sections of the 22 and 24 headers.* C0nfirm the PSEG'risk assessment to delay. AFW.test.ing for 1yearT is reasonable
-Cahill; complete, no concerns* Evaluate if performing a risk assessmentti t eet TechniclSpeciIficatiion4.0,5 is'appropriate if a test was never performed verses missed -Conte/Ennis, follow-up with T/S branch regarding TIA and precedent
-discussions ongoing Operability
-Initial assessment Unit 2 was that it is in better condition based on newer piping; 1994 inspection that identified intact coating; and ISI code gives more allowance to an operating unit (can take credit for up to 90% of the yield stress)." Evaluate the Unit 2 AFW extent of condition operability assessment
-Schroeder/O'Hara operability determination received 4127* Confirm the finite element analysis for the Unit 1 as found condition is acceptable including the use of appropriate methodsand assumptions
-Gray and O'Hara reviewed and did not identify any concerns; HQ review in pr~ogress n I Dutside of Scope: AdditionallItems t Status Board Items:* Salem 1, AFW buried piping -modifications and testing* Salem 2, (PRIORITY)
-T/S risk assessment for AFW~testingý operability determination I
Outside of Scop.
Outside of Scope
[outsidae of Scope
