05000387/FIN-2014005-06: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 12: Line 12:
| identified by = Licensee
| identified by = Licensee
| Inspection procedure =  
| Inspection procedure =  
| Inspector = D Lawyer, F Arner, F Bower, H Gray, J Brand, J Furia, J Grieves, J Heinly, J Nicholson, M Patel, O Masnyk,-Bailey S, Pindale T, Daun C, Grave
| Inspector = D Lawyer, F Arner, F Bower, H Gray, J Brand, J Furia, J Grieves, J Heinly, J Nicholson, M Patel, O Masnyk-Bailey, S Pindale, T Daun, C Graves
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| INPO aspect =  
| INPO aspect =  
| description = Secondary Containment Door Found Ajar On February 12, 2014, PPL identified a secondary containment door (Door 612) between the HVAC room and central railroad bay wedged open by a door sign. In order for secondary containment to be operable in the as-found mode of operation, Door 612 had to be secured. PPL immediately secured the door, entered the condition into their CAP (2014-04709), and reported the condition under LER 50-387; 388/2014-002. Contrary to TS 5.4.1a, PPL did not secure the secondary containment door and maintain system operability in accordance with OP-134-002, RB HVAC Zones 1 and 3 after realignment of the secondary containment. The finding was more than minor because it adversely impacted the barrier performance attribute of barrier integrity and was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) in accordance with IMC 0609, Appendix A, since the finding only represented a degradation of the radiological barrier function provided by standby gas treatment system.
| description = Secondary Containment Door Found Ajar On February 12, 2014, PPL identified a secondary containment door (Door 612) between the HVAC room and central railroad bay wedged open by a door sign. In order for secondary containment to be operable in the as-found mode of operation, Door 612 had to be secured. PPL immediately secured the door, entered the condition into their CAP (2014-04709), and reported the condition under LER 50-387; 388/2014-002. Contrary to TS 5.4.1a, PPL did not secure the secondary containment door and maintain system operability in accordance with OP-134-002, RB HVAC Zones 1 and 3 after realignment of the secondary containment. The finding was more than minor because it adversely impacted the barrier performance attribute of barrier integrity and was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) in accordance with IMC 0609, Appendix A, since the finding only represented a degradation of the radiological barrier function provided by standby gas treatment system.
}}
}}

Revision as of 20:51, 20 February 2018

06
Site: Susquehanna Talen Energy icon.png
Report IR 05000387/2014005 Section 4OA7
Date counted Dec 31, 2014 (2014Q4)
Type: NCV: Green
cornerstone Mitigating Systems
Identified by: Licensee-identified
Inspection Procedure:
Inspectors (proximate) D Lawyer
F Arner
F Bower
H Gray
J Brand
J Furia
J Grieves
J Heinly
J Nicholson
M Patel
O Masnyk-Bailey
S Pindale
T Daun
C Graves
Violation of: Technical Specification
INPO aspect
'