ML14260A035: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY CEOSCIENCES DRPARTMENT TE<;HNICAL REPORT IG A ORIES PREP /\RED R Y: H. Ga_ry_ Greene __ Printed Name VERIFIEDBY: Rictman Printed Name APPROVED BY: Report Number: GEO. DCPP.TR.12.01 Report Revision:
1 Report Dnte:09/02/20 14 Quality Relatctl:
Y Page 1 of 53 Moss Landing Mm ine Laboratories Organi7ation DATE* 5:rl-Z; 20/'f Consulting Geophysicist Organization
&#xa3;&#xa3;J R, 'c_/({
I<_(, ',11c ?tt/!_ Printed Name Organi:;ration 
 
GEOFORM.CF3.GE2.02 (05.02.13) INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF REPORT Report GEO.DCPP.
TR.l2.01, Rev. 1 PAGE 1 of 1 Attachment 1 REPORT VERIFICATION SUMMARY Item Parameter Yes No* N/A* I Purpose is clearly stated and the report satisfies the X Purpose.
2 Data to be interpreted and/or analyzed are included or X referenced.
3 Methodolog y is appropriate and properly applied.
X 4 Assumptions are reasonable
, adequatel y described, and X based upon sound geotechnical principles and practices.
5 Software is identified and properly applied.
Validatio n X is referenced or included, and is acceptable.
Input files are correct.
6 Interpretation and/or Analysis is complete, accurate, X and leads logically to Results and Conclusions. 7 Results and Conclusions are accurate, acceptable, and X reasonable compared to the Data, interpretation and/or analysis, and Assumptions. 8 The Limitation on the use of the Results has been X addressed and is accurate and complete. 9 \ The Impact Evaluation has been included and is X accurate and complete.
10 References are valid for intended use. x* 11 Appendices are complete,
: accurate, and support text. X
* Explain "No" or "N/ A" entries.
(For example, Items 3 thru 7 would beN/ A for a data report that simply presents the collected data.) Comments (use additional pages as necessary):
Comment 1: I was also one of the two ITRs for Rev. 0 of this report. This ITR of Rev. 1 concentrated on the changes to the report and figures listed in the Record of Revisions on page 2 of this report. This ITR also included review of the text and figure edits provided by the PG&E Technical Editor. My comments have been discussed with the authors and subsequently resolved. Comment 2: The appendix was prepared by Fugro Consulting, Inc. (FCL) and subject to FCLs internal QA process and not separately reviewed in this ITR. r;iffl_o;L; 1 (date) --------}}

Revision as of 10:42, 1 July 2018

Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2, Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project (Cccsip) Chapter 2, GEO.DCPP.TR.12.01 R1 Txt.W.Itr
ML14260A035
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/2014
From:
Moss Landing Marine Labs, Pacific Gas & Electric Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML14260A106 List: ... further results
References
DCL-14-081
Download: ML14260A035 (54)
v • d • e


Text

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY CEOSCIENCES DRPARTMENT TE<;HNICAL REPORT IG A ORIES PREP /\RED R Y: H. Ga_ry_ Greene __ Printed Name VERIFIEDBY: Rictman Printed Name APPROVED BY: Report Number: GEO. DCPP.TR.12.01 Report Revision:

1 Report Dnte:09/02/20 14 Quality Relatctl:

Y Page 1 of 53 Moss Landing Mm ine Laboratories Organi7ation DATE* 5:rl-Z; 20/'f Consulting Geophysicist Organization

££J R, 'c_/({

I<_(, ',11c ?tt/!_ Printed Name Organi:;ration

GEOFORM.CF3.GE2.02 (05.02.13) INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF REPORT Report GEO.DCPP.

TR.l2.01, Rev. 1 PAGE 1 of 1 Attachment 1 REPORT VERIFICATION SUMMARY Item Parameter Yes No* N/A* I Purpose is clearly stated and the report satisfies the X Purpose.

2 Data to be interpreted and/or analyzed are included or X referenced.

3 Methodolog y is appropriate and properly applied.

X 4 Assumptions are reasonable

, adequatel y described, and X based upon sound geotechnical principles and practices.

5 Software is identified and properly applied.

Validatio n X is referenced or included, and is acceptable.

Input files are correct.

6 Interpretation and/or Analysis is complete, accurate, X and leads logically to Results and Conclusions. 7 Results and Conclusions are accurate, acceptable, and X reasonable compared to the Data, interpretation and/or analysis, and Assumptions. 8 The Limitation on the use of the Results has been X addressed and is accurate and complete. 9 \ The Impact Evaluation has been included and is X accurate and complete.

10 References are valid for intended use. x* 11 Appendices are complete,

accurate, and support text. X
  • Explain "No" or "N/ A" entries.

(For example, Items 3 thru 7 would beN/ A for a data report that simply presents the collected data.) Comments (use additional pages as necessary):

Comment 1: I was also one of the two ITRs for Rev. 0 of this report. This ITR of Rev. 1 concentrated on the changes to the report and figures listed in the Record of Revisions on page 2 of this report. This ITR also included review of the text and figure edits provided by the PG&E Technical Editor. My comments have been discussed with the authors and subsequently resolved. Comment 2: The appendix was prepared by Fugro Consulting, Inc. (FCL) and subject to FCLs internal QA process and not separately reviewed in this ITR. r;iffl_o;L; 1 (date) --------

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14260A035&oldid=786959"