ML15134A359: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Pre-Submittal Meeting for Palo Verde Unit 1, 2, and 3 Updated Spent Fuel Pool Criticality AnalysisMay 11, 2015 Purpose*Present and discuss planned licensing changeschanges-Update spent fuel pool (SFP) criticality analysis-Add neutron absorbing inserts to SFP racks2 Objectives*Updated criticality analysis will-Provide basis for replacing non-conservative Technical Specification (TS) caused by missed poweruprateimpactpower uprate impact-Include Next Generation Fuel (NGF) *Account for reactivity effects of integral fuel burnable absorber (IFBA)Maintainfullcoreoffloadcapability-Maintain full core offload capability3 Borated Aluminum Inserts*Additional reactivity hold down is planned tomeet10CFR5068andmaintainfullto meet 10 CFR 50.68 and maintain full core offload capabilityThlhdliiittld-Thermal hydraulic, seismic, structural, and pool cooling calculations will be updated as needed-Add a coupon surveillance program to monitor material performance4 TS Changes*TS 3.7.17 -Spent Fuel Assembly Storage -Incorporate new burnup and enrichment curves-Display information with the polynomial explicitly stated-Include diagrams of approved arrays5 TS Changes*TS 3.7.15 -Fuel Storage Pool Boron-Currently 2150 ppm-May increase in response to accident conditions analysis6 TS Changes*TS 4.3 -Fuel Storage-Incorporate new arrays-Update boron concentration-Reduce radially averaged enrichment from  4.8 wt% to 4.65 wt%7 New TS*5.5.21 -Spent Fuel Storage Rack Neutron AbsorberMonitoringprogramAbsorber Monitoring program -Will consider upcoming NRC Generic Letter "MonitoringofNeutronAbsorbingMaterialsinMonitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools"RecentDresdenOE-Recent Dresden OE-License extension-Plant decommissioning8 Implementation *Prior to NGF implementation in each unit*Considering installing inserts under            10CFR505910 CFR 50.59Cidiliditif*Considering a license condition for a specified period of time to transition betweenTSbetween TS9 Methodology*Based onISG201001"StaffGuidanceRegardingthe-ISG-2010-01, "Staff Guidance Regarding the Nuclear Criticality Safety Analysis for Spent Fuel Pools"-NEI 12-16, "Guidance for Performing Criticality Analyses of Fuel Storage at Light-Water ReactorPowerPlants"Revision1Reactor Power Plants, Revision 1-EPRI Depletion Benchmark Reports-Multiple NUREGsp10 Recent Licensing Actions*Methodology similar to:-ComanchePeak-Comanche Peak-Prairie Island-Turkey Point*Insert material similar to:-LaSallePhBtt-Peach Bottom-Quad Cities*Criticalitycodeusagesimilarto:Criticality code usage similar to:-Millstone 211 ISG Item 1 -Fuel Assembly Selection*Palo Verde will demonstrate that variations indesignareadequatelyaccountedforinin design are adequately accounted for in a single, limiting, fuel assembly designCEStddFl-CE Standard Fuel-CE Value Added Pellet-Westinghouse NGF (8 LUAs)-AREVAAdvancedCE-16HTP(8LTAs)AREVA Advanced CE16 HTP (8 LTAs)12 ISG Item 2 -Depletion Analysis *Depletion parameters will impact the isotopicinventoryofburnedfuelisotopic inventory of burned fuel*Major depletion inputs-Fuel type-Axial burnup -Moderator temperature-Reactor powerSolubleboron-Soluble boron-Burnable absorbers13 ISG Item 2.a -Depletion Uncertainty*The EPRI methodology will be used to demonstratethe5%depletionuncertaintydemonstrate the 5% depletion uncertainty is conservative for Palo Verde*Fission product uncertainty explicitly considered14 ISG Item 2.b -Reactor Parameters*Limiting axial moderator temperature profiles derivedpastpresentandanticipatedprofilesderived past, present, and anticipated profiles-Same methodology employed at Comanche Peakgypy*Analysis performed at 4070 MWth*Licensee controls include verification of radial diibidTldpower distribution and T-cold15 ISG Item 2.c -Burnable Absorbers*Palo Verde has used the following integral burnable absorbers-B4C rods in CE STD Fuel-Erbia in CE STD Fuel and Value Added Pellet-IntegralFuelBurnableAbsorber(IFBA)inNGFIntegral Fuel Burnable Absorber (IFBA) in NGF -Gadolinia in AREVA Fuel *AnalysiswillnotcreditErbiaBCorGadolinia*Analysis will not credit Erbia, B4C, or Gadolinia*NGF fuel modeled with IFBA in all 236 pins for depletion analysis onlypyy-Pool model assumes no burnable absorbers16 ISG Item 2.d -Rodded Operation*Palo Verde does not operate with control rodsinsertedrods inserted-Guide tube wear program*End of cycle check will ensure that fuel assembliesexperiencedaninsignificantassemblies experienced an insignificant amount of rodded operation at hot full powerp17 ISG Item 3 -Criticality Analysis*SCALE 6.1.2 will be used in the analysis-KENO V.a solves the eigenvalue (keff) problem in 3D using the Monte Carlo method-238 Group ENDF/B-VII will be used as the library-Millstone LAR used SCALE 6.0 with the KENO V.a module and 238 Group ENDF/B-VII library18 ISG Item 3.a -Axial Burnup Profile*Bounding axial burnup profiles selected frompastpresentandanticipatedfrom past, present, and anticipated profilesClifilitlildhk-Cycle specific licensee controls include checks on cutback regions (blanket), fuel design, and moderator temperature-Same methodology used at Comanche Peak and Prairie Island19 ISG Item 3.b -Rack Model*Dimensions and tolerance of racks are traceabletodesigndocumentstraceable to design documentsBoratedaluminuminsertB10areal*Borated aluminum insert B-10 areal density conservatively modeled at quantitylessthanminimumcertifiedarealquantity less than minimum certified areal density20 ISG Item 3.c -Interfaces*All interfaces are evaluated and all interfacesareanacceptable2x2arrayinterfaces are an acceptable 2x2 array-Palo Verde has only one rack design-No gaps modeled between rack modules21 ISG Item 3.d -Normal Conditions*Analysis demonstrates that keff 0.95 at lessthantheTSrequiredboronless than the TS required boron concentration for:Fuelmovement-Fuel movement-Fuel inspection and reconstitutionForeignObjectSearchandRetrieval-Foreign Object Search and Retrieval-Limiting normal condition to initiate accident identifiedidentified22 ISG Item 3.e -Accident Conditions*Analysis demonstrates that keff 0.95 at lessthantheTSrequiredboronless than the TS required boron concentration forMisloadedordroppedsinglefreshfuel-Misloaded or dropped single fresh fuel assembly into, outside of, or on top of spent fuel racks-Multiple misloaded fuel assemblies-Loss of SFP cooling-Seismic events23 ISG Item 3.e (contd.)*Limiting dilution event reduces pool boron  from2150ppmto1900ppmfrom 2150 ppm to 1900 ppm TRMrequiresboronconcentrationtobe*TRM requires boron concentration to be maintained at 4000 ppm24 ISG Item 4 -Code Validation*Will perform criticality code validation in accordancewithNUREG/CR-6698accordance with NUREG/CR-6698-Data carefully considered to identify trends consistentwithNUREG1475consistent with NUREG-1475-HTC experiments will be included*Fission products will be explicitly accounted for-No lumped fission products will be used25 Palo Verde Arrays*6 arrays will be analyzed*Palo Verde expects to submit between 3 and6ofthefollowingarraysforapprovaland 6 of the following arrays for approvalFildiifltid*Final designs specify location and orientation of borated aluminum inserts26 Palo Verde Arrays*Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr)withtwoblockedlocationsandno(Fr) with two blocked locations and no inserts27 Palo Verde Arrays*Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr)withtwotrashcans(TC)andtwo(Fr) with two trash cans (TC) and two inserts28 Palo Verde Arrays*Infinite array of 3 low reactivity fuel assemblies(Lo)and1high(Hi)reactivityassemblies (Lo) and 1 high (Hi) reactivity fuel assembly with 2 inserts29 Palo Verde Arrays*Infinite array of 2 high reactivity fuel assemblies(Hi)andonelowreactivityfuelassemblies (Hi) and one low reactivity fuel assembly (Lo) with one blocked cell and oneinsertone insert30 Palo Verde Arrays*Infinite array of 4 low reactivity fuel assemblies(Lo)withoneinsertassemblies (Lo) with one insert31 Palo Verde Arrays*Infinite array of 4 depleted fuel assemblies (De)withnoinserts(De) with no inserts32 Margin Maintenance*Palo Verde will monitor the margin identifiedintheanalysisidentified in the analysis*CyclespecificchecksofkeyinputCycle specific checks of key input parameters*0.005 k additional margin reserved by    Palo VerdeBurnupandenrichmentcurveswillbefor-Burnup and enrichment curves will be for      keff= 0.9933 Conclusion*Palo Verde is proposing an acceptable methodology for performing SFP criticality gypgyanalysisllldbdl*Permanently installed borated aluminum inserts will be credited in the analysis*Submit LAR by Nov 2015*Request NRC approval in 18 -24 months34}}
{{#Wiki_filter:Pre-Submittal Meeting for Palo Verde Unit 1, 2, and 3 Updated Spent Fuel Pool Criticality AnalysisMay 11, 2015 Purpose*Present and discuss planned licensing changeschanges-Update spent fuel pool (SFP) criticality analysis
-Add neutron absorbing inserts to SFP racks 2
Objectives
*Updated criticality analysis will
-Provide basis for replacing non-conservative Technical Specification (TS) caused by missed poweruprateimpact power uprate impact-Include Next Generation Fuel (NGF)  
*Account for reactivity effects of integral fuel burnable absorber (IFBA)Maintainfullcoreoffloadcapability
-Maintain full core offload capability 3
Borated Aluminum Inserts
*Additional reactivity hold down is planned tomeet10CFR5068andmaintainfull to meet 10 CFR 50.68 and maintain full core offload capabilityThlhdliiittld
-Thermal hydraulic, seismic, structural, and pool cooling calculations will be updated as  
 
needed-Add a coupon surveillance program to monitor material performance 4
TS Changes
*TS 3.7.17 -Spent Fuel Assembly Storage  
-Incorporate new burnup and enrichment curves-Display information with the polynomial explicitly stated
-Include diagrams of approved arrays 5
TS Changes
*TS 3.7.15 -Fuel Storage Pool Boron
-Currently 2150 ppm
-May increase in response to accident conditions analysis 6
TS Changes
*TS 4.3 -Fuel Storage
-Incorporate new arrays
-Update boron concentration
-Reduce radially averaged enrichment from  4.8 wt% to 4.65 wt%
7 New TS*5.5.21 -Spent Fuel Storage Rack Neutron AbsorberMonitoringprogram Absorber Monitoring program -Will consider upcoming NRC Generic Letter "MonitoringofNeutronAbsorbingMaterialsin Monitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools" RecentDresdenOE
-Recent Dresden OE-License extension
-Plant decommissioning 8
Implementation  
*Prior to NGF implementation in each unit
*Considering installing inserts under            10CFR5059 10 CFR 50.59Cidiliditif
*Considering a license con dition for a specified period of time to transition betweenTS between TS9 Methodology
*Based onISG201001"StaffGuidanceRegardingthe
-ISG-2010-01, "Staff Guidance Regarding the Nuclear Criticality Safety Analysis for Spent Fuel Pools"
-NEI 12-16, "Guidance for Performing Criticality Analyses of Fuel Storage at Light-Water ReactorPowerPlants "Revision1Reactor Power Plants, Revision 1-EPRI Depletion Benchmark Reports
-Multiple NUREGs p10 Recent Licensing Actions
*Methodology similar to:
-ComanchePeak
-Comanche Peak-Prairie Island
-Turkey Point
*Insert material similar to:
-LaSallePhBtt-Peach Bottom-Quad Cities
*Criticalitycode usagesimilarto:
Criticality code usage similar to:-Millstone 2 11 ISG Item 1 -Fuel Assembly Selection
*Palo Verde will demonstrate that variations indesignareadequatelyaccountedforin in design are adequately accounted for in a single, limiting, fuel assembly designCEStddFl-CE Standard Fuel-CE Value Added Pellet
-Westinghouse NGF (8 LUAs)
-AREVAAdvancedCE
-16HTP(8LTAs)AREVA Advanced CE16 HTP (8 LTAs)12 ISG Item 2 -Depletion Analysis  
*Depletion parameters will impact the isotopicinventoryofburnedfuel isotopic inventory of burned fuel*Major depletion inputs
-Fuel type
-Axial burnup  
-Moderator temperature
-Reactor powerSolubleboron
-Soluble boron-Burnable absorbers 13 ISG Item 2.a -Depletion Uncertainty
*The EPRI methodology will be used to demonstratethe5%depletionuncertaintydemonstrate the 5% depletion uncertainty is conservative for Palo Verde
*Fission product uncertainty explicitly considered 14 ISG Item 2.b -Reactor Parameters
*Limiting axial moderator temperature profiles derivedpastpresentandanticipatedprofilesderived past, present, and anticipated profiles-Same methodolo gy employed at Comanche Peakgypy*Analysis performed at 4070 MWth
*Licensee controls include verification of radial diibidTldpower distribution and T-cold15 ISG Item 2.c -Burnable Absorbers
*Palo Verde has used the following integral burnable absorbers
-B4C rods in CE STD Fuel
-Erbia in CE STD Fuel and Value Added Pellet
-IntegralFuelBurnableAbsorber(IFBA)inNGFIntegral Fuel Burnable Absorber (IFBA) in NGF -Gadolinia in AREVA Fuel  
*AnalysiswillnotcreditErbiaBCorGadolinia
*Analysis will not credit Erbia, B4C, or Gadolinia
*NGF fuel modeled with IFBA in all 236 pins for depletion anal ysis onlypyy-Pool model assumes no burnable absorbers 16 ISG Item 2.d -Rodded Operation
*Palo Verde does not operate with control rodsinsertedrods inserted-Guide tube wear program
*End of cycle check will ensure that fuel assembliesexperiencedaninsignificant assemblies experienced an insignificant amount of rodded operation at hot full powerp17 ISG Item 3 -Criticality Analysis
*SCALE 6.1.2 will be used in the analysis
-KENO V.a solves the eigenvalue (k eff) problem in 3D using the Monte Carlo method
-238 Group ENDF/B-VII will be used as the library-Millstone LAR used SCALE 6.0 with the KENO V.a module and 238 Group ENDF/B-VII library 18 ISG Item 3.a -Axial Burnup Profile
*Bounding axial burnup profiles selected frompastpresentandanticipated from past, present, and anticipated profilesClifilitlildhk
-Cycle specific licensee con trols include checks on cutback regions (blanket), fuel design, and moderator temperature
-Same methodology used at Comanche Peak and Prairie Island 19 ISG Item 3.b -Rack Model
*Dimensions and tolerance of racks are traceabletodesigndocumentstraceable to design documentsBoratedaluminuminsertB10areal*Borated aluminum insert B-10 areal density conservatively modeled at quantitylessthanminimumcertifiedareal quantity less than minimum certified areal density20 ISG Item 3.c -Interfaces
*All interfaces are evaluated and all interfacesareanacceptable2x2array interfaces are an acceptable 2x2 array-Palo Verde has only one rack design
-No gaps modeled between rack modules 21 ISG Item 3.d -Normal Conditions
*Analysis demonstrates that k eff 0.95 at lessthantheTSrequiredboron less than the TS required boron concentration for:Fuelmovement
-Fuel movement-Fuel inspection and reconstitutionForeignObjectSearchandRetrieval
-Foreign Object Search and Retrieval
-Limiting normal condition to initiate accident identified identified 22 ISG Item 3.e -Accident Conditions
*Analysis demonstrates that k eff 0.95 at lessthantheTSrequiredboron less than the TS required boron concentration forMisloadedordroppedsinglefreshfuel
-Misloaded or dropped single fresh fuel assembly into, outside of, or on top of spent fuel racks
-Multiple misloaded fuel assemblies
-Loss of SFP cooling
-Seismic events 23 ISG Item 3.e (contd.)
*Limiting dilution event reduces pool boron  from2150ppmto1900ppm from 2150 ppm to 1900 ppm TRMrequiresboronconcentrationtobe
*TRM requires boron concentration to be maintained at 4000 ppm 24 ISG Item 4 -Code Validation
*Will perform criticality code validation in accordancewithNUREG/CR
-6698accordance with NUREG/CR-6698-Data carefully considered to identify trends consistentwithNUREG 1475consistent with NUREG-1475-HTC experiments will be included
*Fission products will be explicitly accounted for
-No lumped fission products will be used 25 Palo Verde Arrays
*6 arrays will be analyzed
*Palo Verde expects to submit between 3 and6ofthefollowingarraysforapproval and 6 of the following arrays for approvalFildiifltid
*Final designs specify location and orientation of borated aluminum inserts 26 Palo Verde Arrays
*Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr)withtwoblockedlocationsandno (Fr) with two blocked locations and no inserts27 Palo Verde Arrays
*Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr)withtwotrashcans(TC)andtwo (Fr) with two trash cans (TC) and two inserts28 Palo Verde Arrays
*Infinite array of 3 low reactivity fuel assemblies(Lo)and1high(Hi)reactivity assemblies (Lo) and 1 high (Hi) reactivity fuel assembly with 2 inserts29 Palo Verde Arrays
*Infinite array of 2 high reactivity fuel assemblies(Hi)andonelowreactivityfuel assemblies (Hi) and one low reactivity fuel assembly (Lo) with one blocked cell and oneinsert one insert30 Palo Verde Arrays
*Infinite array of 4 low reactivity fuel assemblies(Lo)withoneinsert assemblies (Lo) with one insert31 Palo Verde Arrays
*Infinite array of 4 depleted fuel assemblies (De)withnoinserts (De) with no inserts32 Margin Maintenance
*Palo Verde will monitor the margin identifiedintheanalysis identified in the analysis*CyclespecificchecksofkeyinputCycle specific checks of key input parameters
*0.005 k additional margin reserved by    Palo VerdeBurnupandenrichmentcurveswillbefor
-Burnup and enrichment curves will be for      keff= 0.9933 Conclusion
*Palo Verde is proposing an acceptable methodolo gy for performing SFP criticalit y gypgyanalysisllldbdl*Permanent ly installed borated aluminum inserts will be credited in the analysis
*Submit LAR by Nov 2015
*Request NRC approval in 18 -24 months 34}}

Revision as of 01:11, 1 July 2018

5/11/2015, Meeting Slide Regarding Pre-Submittal Meeting for Palo Verde Unit 1, 2, and 3 Updated Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Analysis
ML15134A359
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 05/11/2015
From:
Arizona Public Service Co
To: Regner L M
Plant Licensing Branch IV
Regner L M
References
Download: ML15134A359 (34)


Text

Pre-Submittal Meeting for Palo Verde Unit 1, 2, and 3 Updated Spent Fuel Pool Criticality AnalysisMay 11, 2015 Purpose*Present and discuss planned licensing changeschanges-Update spent fuel pool (SFP) criticality analysis

-Add neutron absorbing inserts to SFP racks 2

Objectives

  • Updated criticality analysis will

-Provide basis for replacing non-conservative Technical Specification (TS) caused by missed poweruprateimpact power uprate impact-Include Next Generation Fuel (NGF)

  • Account for reactivity effects of integral fuel burnable absorber (IFBA)Maintainfullcoreoffloadcapability

-Maintain full core offload capability 3

Borated Aluminum Inserts

  • Additional reactivity hold down is planned tomeet10CFR5068andmaintainfull to meet 10 CFR 50.68 and maintain full core offload capabilityThlhdliiittld

-Thermal hydraulic, seismic, structural, and pool cooling calculations will be updated as

needed-Add a coupon surveillance program to monitor material performance 4

TS Changes

  • TS 3.7.17 -Spent Fuel Assembly Storage

-Incorporate new burnup and enrichment curves-Display information with the polynomial explicitly stated

-Include diagrams of approved arrays 5

TS Changes

  • TS 3.7.15 -Fuel Storage Pool Boron

-Currently 2150 ppm

-May increase in response to accident conditions analysis 6

TS Changes

  • TS 4.3 -Fuel Storage

-Incorporate new arrays

-Update boron concentration

-Reduce radially averaged enrichment from 4.8 wt% to 4.65 wt%

7 New TS*5.5.21 -Spent Fuel Storage Rack Neutron AbsorberMonitoringprogram Absorber Monitoring program -Will consider upcoming NRC Generic Letter "MonitoringofNeutronAbsorbingMaterialsin Monitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools" RecentDresdenOE

-Recent Dresden OE-License extension

-Plant decommissioning 8

Implementation

  • Prior to NGF implementation in each unit
  • Considering installing inserts under 10CFR5059 10 CFR 50.59Cidiliditif
  • Considering a license con dition for a specified period of time to transition betweenTS between TS9 Methodology
  • Based onISG201001"StaffGuidanceRegardingthe

-ISG-2010-01, "Staff Guidance Regarding the Nuclear Criticality Safety Analysis for Spent Fuel Pools"

-NEI 12-16, "Guidance for Performing Criticality Analyses of Fuel Storage at Light-Water ReactorPowerPlants "Revision1Reactor Power Plants, Revision 1-EPRI Depletion Benchmark Reports

-Multiple NUREGs p10 Recent Licensing Actions

  • Methodology similar to:

-ComanchePeak

-Comanche Peak-Prairie Island

-Turkey Point

  • Insert material similar to:

-LaSallePhBtt-Peach Bottom-Quad Cities

  • Criticalitycode usagesimilarto:

Criticality code usage similar to:-Millstone 2 11 ISG Item 1 -Fuel Assembly Selection

  • Palo Verde will demonstrate that variations indesignareadequatelyaccountedforin in design are adequately accounted for in a single, limiting, fuel assembly designCEStddFl-CE Standard Fuel-CE Value Added Pellet

-Westinghouse NGF (8 LUAs)

-AREVAAdvancedCE

-16HTP(8LTAs)AREVA Advanced CE16 HTP (8 LTAs)12 ISG Item 2 -Depletion Analysis

  • Depletion parameters will impact the isotopicinventoryofburnedfuel isotopic inventory of burned fuel*Major depletion inputs

-Fuel type

-Axial burnup

-Moderator temperature

-Reactor powerSolubleboron

-Soluble boron-Burnable absorbers 13 ISG Item 2.a -Depletion Uncertainty

  • The EPRI methodology will be used to demonstratethe5%depletionuncertaintydemonstrate the 5% depletion uncertainty is conservative for Palo Verde
  • Fission product uncertainty explicitly considered 14 ISG Item 2.b -Reactor Parameters
  • Limiting axial moderator temperature profiles derivedpastpresentandanticipatedprofilesderived past, present, and anticipated profiles-Same methodolo gy employed at Comanche Peakgypy*Analysis performed at 4070 MWth
  • Licensee controls include verification of radial diibidTldpower distribution and T-cold15 ISG Item 2.c -Burnable Absorbers
  • Palo Verde has used the following integral burnable absorbers

-B4C rods in CE STD Fuel

-Erbia in CE STD Fuel and Value Added Pellet

-IntegralFuelBurnableAbsorber(IFBA)inNGFIntegral Fuel Burnable Absorber (IFBA) in NGF -Gadolinia in AREVA Fuel

  • AnalysiswillnotcreditErbiaBCorGadolinia
  • Analysis will not credit Erbia, B4C, or Gadolinia
  • NGF fuel modeled with IFBA in all 236 pins for depletion anal ysis onlypyy-Pool model assumes no burnable absorbers 16 ISG Item 2.d -Rodded Operation
  • End of cycle check will ensure that fuel assembliesexperiencedaninsignificant assemblies experienced an insignificant amount of rodded operation at hot full powerp17 ISG Item 3 -Criticality Analysis
  • SCALE 6.1.2 will be used in the analysis

-KENO V.a solves the eigenvalue (k eff) problem in 3D using the Monte Carlo method

-238 Group ENDF/B-VII will be used as the library-Millstone LAR used SCALE 6.0 with the KENO V.a module and 238 Group ENDF/B-VII library 18 ISG Item 3.a -Axial Burnup Profile

  • Bounding axial burnup profiles selected frompastpresentandanticipated from past, present, and anticipated profilesClifilitlildhk

-Cycle specific licensee con trols include checks on cutback regions (blanket), fuel design, and moderator temperature

-Same methodology used at Comanche Peak and Prairie Island 19 ISG Item 3.b -Rack Model

  • Dimensions and tolerance of racks are traceabletodesigndocumentstraceable to design documentsBoratedaluminuminsertB10areal*Borated aluminum insert B-10 areal density conservatively modeled at quantitylessthanminimumcertifiedareal quantity less than minimum certified areal density20 ISG Item 3.c -Interfaces
  • All interfaces are evaluated and all interfacesareanacceptable2x2array interfaces are an acceptable 2x2 array-Palo Verde has only one rack design

-No gaps modeled between rack modules 21 ISG Item 3.d -Normal Conditions

  • Analysis demonstrates that k eff 0.95 at lessthantheTSrequiredboron less than the TS required boron concentration for:Fuelmovement

-Fuel movement-Fuel inspection and reconstitutionForeignObjectSearchandRetrieval

-Foreign Object Search and Retrieval

-Limiting normal condition to initiate accident identified identified 22 ISG Item 3.e -Accident Conditions

  • Analysis demonstrates that k eff 0.95 at lessthantheTSrequiredboron less than the TS required boron concentration forMisloadedordroppedsinglefreshfuel

-Misloaded or dropped single fresh fuel assembly into, outside of, or on top of spent fuel racks

-Multiple misloaded fuel assemblies

-Loss of SFP cooling

-Seismic events 23 ISG Item 3.e (contd.)

  • Limiting dilution event reduces pool boron from2150ppmto1900ppm from 2150 ppm to 1900 ppm TRMrequiresboronconcentrationtobe
  • TRM requires boron concentration to be maintained at 4000 ppm 24 ISG Item 4 -Code Validation
  • Will perform criticality code validation in accordancewithNUREG/CR

-6698accordance with NUREG/CR-6698-Data carefully considered to identify trends consistentwithNUREG 1475consistent with NUREG-1475-HTC experiments will be included

  • Fission products will be explicitly accounted for

-No lumped fission products will be used 25 Palo Verde Arrays

  • 6 arrays will be analyzed
  • Palo Verde expects to submit between 3 and6ofthefollowingarraysforapproval and 6 of the following arrays for approvalFildiifltid
  • Final designs specify location and orientation of borated aluminum inserts 26 Palo Verde Arrays
  • Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr)withtwoblockedlocationsandno (Fr) with two blocked locations and no inserts27 Palo Verde Arrays
  • Infinite array of 2 fresh fuel assemblies (Fr)withtwotrashcans(TC)andtwo (Fr) with two trash cans (TC) and two inserts28 Palo Verde Arrays
  • Infinite array of 3 low reactivity fuel assemblies(Lo)and1high(Hi)reactivity assemblies (Lo) and 1 high (Hi) reactivity fuel assembly with 2 inserts29 Palo Verde Arrays
  • Infinite array of 2 high reactivity fuel assemblies(Hi)andonelowreactivityfuel assemblies (Hi) and one low reactivity fuel assembly (Lo) with one blocked cell and oneinsert one insert30 Palo Verde Arrays
  • Infinite array of 4 low reactivity fuel assemblies(Lo)withoneinsert assemblies (Lo) with one insert31 Palo Verde Arrays
  • Infinite array of 4 depleted fuel assemblies (De)withnoinserts (De) with no inserts32 Margin Maintenance
  • Palo Verde will monitor the margin identifiedintheanalysis identified in the analysis*CyclespecificchecksofkeyinputCycle specific checks of key input parameters
  • 0.005 k additional margin reserved by Palo VerdeBurnupandenrichmentcurveswillbefor

-Burnup and enrichment curves will be for keff= 0.9933 Conclusion

  • Palo Verde is proposing an acceptable methodolo gy for performing SFP criticalit y gypgyanalysisllldbdl*Permanent ly installed borated aluminum inserts will be credited in the analysis
  • Submit LAR by Nov 2015
  • Request NRC approval in 18 -24 months 34