ML17325B183: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:kCCE1KPATEDD1BUI3OYBEM0~ | {{#Wiki_filter:kCCE1KPATEDD1BUI3OYBEM0~STlOYSYSTEMeeREGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM(RIDS)DOCKET0500031505000316RI+RSDD | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
Application.foramendstoLicenses'PR-58&DPR-74, | Application. | ||
foramendstoLicenses'PR-58 | |||
&DPR-74,to clarifyresponsetimetestingrequirements forPRNFRT.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal: | |||
GeneralDistribution NOTES:COPIESLTTRENCL11RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDCOPIESLTTRENCL1155RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LASTANG,J111111111011INTERNAL: | |||
ARM/DAF/LFMB NRR/DEST/CEB 8HNRR/DEST/ICSB NRR/DEST/RSB 8E-ABSTRACT RElFIE'110111.1111111NRR/DEST/ADS 7ENRR/DEST/ESB 8DNRR/DEST/MTB 9HNRR/DOEA/TSB 11OGC/HDS1RES/DSIR/EIB ACCESSION NBR:8904040229 DOC.DATE: | |||
89/03/29NOTARIZED: | |||
NOFACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,Indiana&50-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,Indiana&AUTH.NAME.AUTHORAFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P. | |||
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.RECIP.NAME | |||
'ECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E. | |||
DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)EXTERNAL: | |||
LPDRNSIC1111NRCPDR11NAZEK)ALL"RIDS"RECIPIENIS'LEASE HELPUSK)REDUCEWASTE!COMI'ACZ'IHEDOCUMENTCONIBDLDESK,RDCMPl-37(EXT.20079)KOELIMINATE YOURNMEFRYDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUHENZS YOUDON'TNEED!STOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED: | |||
LTTR22ENCL20 indianaMichiganPowerCompanyP.O.Box16631Coiumbus, OH43216ItlAIEMANA MCHE6'ANPWE5kAEP:NRC:1078 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74CLARIFICATION OFRESPONSETIMETESTINGREQUIREMENTS FORPOWERRANGENEUTRONFLUXREACTORTRIPU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Attn:T.E.Murley1March29,1989 | |||
==DearDr.Murley:== | ==DearDr.Murley:== | ||
Thisletterconstitutes anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/Ss)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.Units1and2.Specifically weareproposing toclarifytheresponsetimetestingrequirements forthepowerrangeneutronfluxreactortrip.Adetaileddescription ofthechange,ourreasonsforrequesting thechange,andouranalysesconcerning significant hazardsarecontained inAttachment 1.Attachment 2includestheproposedrevisedT/Spages.Webelievethattheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountsofanyeffluentthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure. | |||
TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andwillbereviewedbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee attheirnextregularly scheduled meeting.Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(1), | |||
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.R.C.CallenoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andMr.GeorgeBruchmann oftheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.S904040229 S90329PDRADOCK05000315PPDCoor Dr.T.E.Murley-2-AEP'NRC:1078 Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures thatincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoensureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned. | |||
Sincerely, M.P.AlichVicePresident ldpAttachments cc:D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G~Smith,Jr.-BridgmanR.C.CallenG.CharnoffA.B.DavisNRCResidentInspector | |||
-BridgmanG.Bruchmann ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC1078REASONSAND10CFR50.92ANALYSESFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITS1AND2TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:1078 Page1DescritionofChaneThisletterproposestoclarifytherequirements ofTable3.3-2,"ReactorTripSystemInstrumentation ResponseTimes,"byindicating thattherequirements ofFunctional Unit2applytoboththehighandlowpowerrangeneutronflux(PRNF)reactortripsetpoints. | |||
BackroundandReasonsforChaneDuringareviewofourreactortripsysteminstrumentation timeresponsetestingprocedures, itwasobservedthatthetimeresponsetestprocedure forthenuclearinstrumentation systemPRNFreactortriponlyincludedthehighsetpointtrip.SincecreditwastakenforthelowsetpointtripinthesafetyanalysisforbothUnits1and2,thelowsetpointshouldhavebeentimeresponsetested.ItisbelievedthatthelackofspecificdetailintheT/Ssregarding theseparatesetpoints wasacontributing factortothelackoftesting,andwearetherefore submitting theproposedchangesofthislettertoensurethatsufficient detailisincludedintheT/SsforthePRNFreactortrip.Justification forChaneThesechangesareconsidered tobeadministrative innatureandintendedtoclarifytheresponsetimetestingrequirements forthePRNFreactortrip.Nooperability orsurveillance requirements willbereducedasaresultofthischange.AnalsisofSinificantHazardsPer10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment willnotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration iftheproposedamendment doesnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofapreviously evaluated | |||
: accident, (2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously evaluated, or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Criterion 1ThischangeisintendedtoclarifytheexistingT/Srequirements forthePRNFreactortrip,Nooperability orsurveillance requirements havebeenreduced.Wetherefore believethechangedoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously analyzedorasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety. | |||
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:1078 Page2Criterion 2Thechangedoesnotinvolvephysicalmodifications totheplantorchangesinplantoperation. | |||
Thechangetherefore shouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously analyzedorevaluated. | |||
Criterion 3SeeCriterion 1above.Lastly,wenotethattheCommission hasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermination ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration. | |||
Thefirstoftheseexamplesreferstochangeswhicharepurelyadministrative innature:forexample,changestoachieveconsistency throughout theT/Ss,correction oferrors,orchangesinnomenclature. | |||
Theproposedchangeonlyclarifies thepresentT/S.Wearenotproposing toreduceanypresentrequirements. | |||
Forthesereasons,webelievethattheexamplecitedisapplicable andthattheproposedchangeshouldnotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration. | |||
TABLE3.3- | TABLE3.3-2REACTORTRIPSYSTEMINSTRUMENTATION RESPONSETIMESFUNCTIONAL UNIT1.ManualReactorTripRESPONSETIMENOTAPPLICABLE 2.PowerRange,NeutronFlux(HighandLowSetpoint) | ||
Lessthanorequalto0.5seconds3.PowerRange,NeutronFlux,HighPositiveRateNOTAPPLICABLE 4.PowerRange,NeutronFlux,HighNegativeRateLessthanorequalto0.5seconds*5.Intermediate Range,NeutronFluxNOTAPPLICABLE 6.SourceRange,NeutronFlux7.Overtemperature deltaTNOTAPPLICABLE Lessthanorequalto6.0seconds8.Overpower deltaT9.Pressurizer Pressure--Low NOTAPPLICABLE Lessthanorequalto1.0seconds10.Pressurizer Pressure--High Lessthanorequalto1.0seconds11.Pressurizer WaterLevel--High NOTAPPLICABLE | |||
*Neutrondetectors areexemptfromresponsetimetesting.Responsetimeoftheneutronfluxsignalportionofthechannelshallbemeasuredfromdetectoroutputorinputoffirstelectronic component inchannel.COOKNUCLEARPLANT-UNIT23/43-9AMENDMENT NO. | |||
Q~~}} | Q~~}} |
Revision as of 09:17, 29 June 2018
ML17325B183 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook ![]() |
Issue date: | 03/29/1989 |
From: | ALEXICH M P INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
To: | MURLEY T E NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
Shared Package | |
ML17325B184 | List: |
References | |
AEP:NRC:1078, NUDOCS 8904040229 | |
Download: ML17325B183 (9) | |
Text
kCCE1KPATEDD1BUI3OYBEM0~STlOYSYSTEMeeREGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM(RIDS)DOCKET0500031505000316RI+RSDD
SUBJECT:
Application.
foramendstoLicenses'PR-58
&DPR-74,to clarifyresponsetimetestingrequirements forPRNFRT.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:
GeneralDistribution NOTES:COPIESLTTRENCL11RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDCOPIESLTTRENCL1155RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LASTANG,J111111111011INTERNAL:
ARM/DAF/LFMB NRR/DEST/CEB 8HNRR/DEST/ICSB NRR/DEST/RSB 8E-ABSTRACT RElFIE'110111.1111111NRR/DEST/ADS 7ENRR/DEST/ESB 8DNRR/DEST/MTB 9HNRR/DOEA/TSB 11OGC/HDS1RES/DSIR/EIB ACCESSION NBR:8904040229 DOC.DATE:
89/03/29NOTARIZED:
NOFACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,Indiana&50-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,Indiana&AUTH.NAME.AUTHORAFFILIATION ALEXICH,M.P.
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.RECIP.NAME
'ECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.
DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)EXTERNAL:
LPDRNSIC1111NRCPDR11NAZEK)ALL"RIDS"RECIPIENIS'LEASE HELPUSK)REDUCEWASTE!COMI'ACZ'IHEDOCUMENTCONIBDLDESK,RDCMPl-37(EXT.20079)KOELIMINATE YOURNMEFRYDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUHENZS YOUDON'TNEED!STOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR22ENCL20 indianaMichiganPowerCompanyP.O.Box16631Coiumbus, OH43216ItlAIEMANA MCHE6'ANPWE5kAEP:NRC:1078 DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74CLARIFICATION OFRESPONSETIMETESTINGREQUIREMENTS FORPOWERRANGENEUTRONFLUXREACTORTRIPU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Attn:T.E.Murley1March29,1989
DearDr.Murley:
Thisletterconstitutes anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/Ss)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant.Units1and2.Specifically weareproposing toclarifytheresponsetimetestingrequirements forthepowerrangeneutronfluxreactortrip.Adetaileddescription ofthechange,ourreasonsforrequesting thechange,andouranalysesconcerning significant hazardsarecontained inAttachment 1.Attachment 2includestheproposedrevisedT/Spages.Webelievethattheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountsofanyeffluentthatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.
TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andwillbereviewedbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee attheirnextregularly scheduled meeting.Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(1),
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.R.C.CallenoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andMr.GeorgeBruchmann oftheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.S904040229 S90329PDRADOCK05000315PPDCoor Dr.T.E.Murley-2-AEP'NRC:1078 Thisdocumenthasbeenpreparedfollowing Corporate procedures thatincorporate areasonable setofcontrolstoensureitsaccuracyandcompleteness priortosignature bytheundersigned.
Sincerely, M.P.AlichVicePresident ldpAttachments cc:D.H.Williams, Jr.W.G~Smith,Jr.-BridgmanR.C.CallenG.CharnoffA.B.DavisNRCResidentInspector
-BridgmanG.Bruchmann ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC1078REASONSAND10CFR50.92ANALYSESFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITS1AND2TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:1078 Page1DescritionofChaneThisletterproposestoclarifytherequirements ofTable3.3-2,"ReactorTripSystemInstrumentation ResponseTimes,"byindicating thattherequirements ofFunctional Unit2applytoboththehighandlowpowerrangeneutronflux(PRNF)reactortripsetpoints.
BackroundandReasonsforChaneDuringareviewofourreactortripsysteminstrumentation timeresponsetestingprocedures, itwasobservedthatthetimeresponsetestprocedure forthenuclearinstrumentation systemPRNFreactortriponlyincludedthehighsetpointtrip.SincecreditwastakenforthelowsetpointtripinthesafetyanalysisforbothUnits1and2,thelowsetpointshouldhavebeentimeresponsetested.ItisbelievedthatthelackofspecificdetailintheT/Ssregarding theseparatesetpoints wasacontributing factortothelackoftesting,andwearetherefore submitting theproposedchangesofthislettertoensurethatsufficient detailisincludedintheT/SsforthePRNFreactortrip.Justification forChaneThesechangesareconsidered tobeadministrative innatureandintendedtoclarifytheresponsetimetestingrequirements forthePRNFreactortrip.Nooperability orsurveillance requirements willbereducedasaresultofthischange.AnalsisofSinificantHazardsPer10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment willnotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration iftheproposedamendment doesnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofapreviously evaluated
- accident, (2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously evaluated, or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Criterion 1ThischangeisintendedtoclarifytheexistingT/Srequirements forthePRNFreactortrip,Nooperability orsurveillance requirements havebeenreduced.Wetherefore believethechangedoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously analyzedorasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:1078 Page2Criterion 2Thechangedoesnotinvolvephysicalmodifications totheplantorchangesinplantoperation.
Thechangetherefore shouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanypreviously analyzedorevaluated.
Criterion 3SeeCriterion 1above.Lastly,wenotethattheCommission hasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermination ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration.
Thefirstoftheseexamplesreferstochangeswhicharepurelyadministrative innature:forexample,changestoachieveconsistency throughout theT/Ss,correction oferrors,orchangesinnomenclature.
Theproposedchangeonlyclarifies thepresentT/S.Wearenotproposing toreduceanypresentrequirements.
Forthesereasons,webelievethattheexamplecitedisapplicable andthattheproposedchangeshouldnotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration.
TABLE3.3-2REACTORTRIPSYSTEMINSTRUMENTATION RESPONSETIMESFUNCTIONAL UNIT1.ManualReactorTripRESPONSETIMENOTAPPLICABLE 2.PowerRange,NeutronFlux(HighandLowSetpoint)
Lessthanorequalto0.5seconds3.PowerRange,NeutronFlux,HighPositiveRateNOTAPPLICABLE 4.PowerRange,NeutronFlux,HighNegativeRateLessthanorequalto0.5seconds*5.Intermediate Range,NeutronFluxNOTAPPLICABLE 6.SourceRange,NeutronFlux7.Overtemperature deltaTNOTAPPLICABLE Lessthanorequalto6.0seconds8.Overpower deltaT9.Pressurizer Pressure--Low NOTAPPLICABLE Lessthanorequalto1.0seconds10.Pressurizer Pressure--High Lessthanorequalto1.0seconds11.Pressurizer WaterLevel--High NOTAPPLICABLE
- Neutrondetectors areexemptfromresponsetimetesting.Responsetimeoftheneutronfluxsignalportionofthechannelshallbemeasuredfromdetectoroutputorinputoffirstelectronic component inchannel.COOKNUCLEARPLANT-UNIT23/43-9AMENDMENT NO.
Q~~