ML17163A254: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 20: Line 20:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Good morning, Tom Gurdziel <tgurdziel@twcny.rr.com> Sunday, June 11, 2017 3:21 PM CHAIRMAN Resource JNappi@entergy.com; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKl@aol.com [External_Sender] A Serious and Repetitive Matter Back in 2015, Entergy/Indian Point 3 had a refuel outage that lasted about 32 days until they got back to 100% power. (Those days can be checked on the NRC website as being from 3-1-2015 to 4-2-2015.) About 5 Yz months after that refuel outage, they had to shutdown to "Repair RV 0-ring". This took them 13 days until they got back to 100% power. (You can check those days as well. They run from 9-14-2015 to 9-27-2015.) Last night I read that Entergy/Indian Point 3 will be shut down to tonight do the exact same thing. But things are a little different now. This time their most recent refueling outage lasted about 66 days or 73 days to return to full power. Notice that they had twice as long a time to actually work on the 0-ring grooves for the 0-rings, which go between the reactor vessel (below) and the removable reactor vessel (upper) head. And, this time, they didn't get 5 Yz months of use out of the installed 0-ring, no, they are getting less than one month of use. Something is wrong here. How many U.S. plants have to stop a run to fix reactor head 0-rings? How many U.S. plants have to stop to fix their reactor head 0-rings after each refuel outage as is the current Entergy/Indian Point 3 practice? believe the answer is none and none. So let me put it this way. I believe the current condition of the Entergy/Indian Point Unit 3 plant is UNSAFE to return to operation with just the installation of another set of 0-rings. I am requesting that the US NRC keep Entergy/Indian Point 3 shutdown cold until the condition of the upper surface of the reactor vessel, including 0-ring grooves be proved to be identical to the as purchased condition. (In particular, make sure you look for steam cutting.) And, I am requesting that the US NRC keep Entergy/Indian Point 3 shutdown cold until the condition of the lower surface of the upper head is found to be identical to the as purchased condition. This is a 2.206 request. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel I x K, Virus-free. www.avast.com 1}}
 
Good morning, Tom Gurdziel  
<tgurdziel@twcny
.rr.com> Sunday, June 11, 2017 3:21 PM CHAIRMAN Resource JNappi@entergy
.com; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKl@aol.com  
[External_Sender]
A Serious and Repetitive Matter Back in 2015, Entergy/Indian Point 3 had a refuel outage that lasted about 32 days until they got back to 100% power. (Those days can be checked on the NRC website as being from 3-1-2015 to 4-2-2015.)
About 5 Yz months after that refuel outage, they had to shutdown to "Repair RV 0-ring".
This took them 13 days until they got back to 100% power. (You can check those days as well. They run from 9-14-2015 to 9-27-2015.)
Last night I read that Entergy/Indian Point 3 will be shut down to tonight do the exact same thing. But things are a little different now. This time their most recent refueling outage lasted about 66 days or 73 days to return to full power. Notice that they had twice as long a time to actually work on the 0-ring grooves for the 0-rings, which go between the reactor vessel (below) and the removable reactor vessel (upper) head. And, this time, they didn't get 5 Yz months of use out of the installed 0-ring, no, they are getting less than one month of use. Something is wrong here. How many U.S. plants have to stop a run to fix reactor head 0-rings?
How many U.S. plants have to stop to fix their reactor head 0-rings after each refuel outage as is the current Entergy/Indian Point 3 practice?
believe the answer is none and none. So let me put it this way. I believe the current condition of the Entergy/Indian Point Unit 3 plant is UNSAFE to return to operation with just the installation of another set of 0-rings.
I am requesting that the US NRC keep Entergy/Indian Point 3 shutdown cold until the condition of the upper surface of the reactor vessel, including 0-ring grooves be proved to be identical to the as purchased condition
. (In particular, make sure you look for steam cutting.)
And, I am requesting that the US NRC keep Entergy/Indian Point 3 shutdown cold until the condition of the lower surface of the upper head is found to be identical to the as purchased condition
. This is a 2.206 request. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel I x K, Virus-free.
www.avast.com 1}}

Revision as of 19:31, 29 June 2018

LTR-17-0235 Tom Gurdziel, E-mail a Serious and Repetitive Matter
ML17163A254
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/2017
From: Tom Gurdziel
Public Commenter
To: Svinicki K L
NRC/Chairman
Shared Package
ML17163A255 List:
References
LTR-17-0235
Download: ML17163A254 (1)
v • d • e


Text

CHAIRMAN Resource From: Sent: To: Cc:

Subject:

Good morning, Tom Gurdziel

<tgurdziel@twcny

.rr.com> Sunday, June 11, 2017 3:21 PM CHAIRMAN Resource JNappi@entergy

.com; Bridget Frymire; ESTRONSKl@aol.com

[External_Sender]

A Serious and Repetitive Matter Back in 2015, Entergy/Indian Point 3 had a refuel outage that lasted about 32 days until they got back to 100% power. (Those days can be checked on the NRC website as being from 3-1-2015 to 4-2-2015.)

About 5 Yz months after that refuel outage, they had to shutdown to "Repair RV 0-ring".

This took them 13 days until they got back to 100% power. (You can check those days as well. They run from 9-14-2015 to 9-27-2015.)

Last night I read that Entergy/Indian Point 3 will be shut down to tonight do the exact same thing. But things are a little different now. This time their most recent refueling outage lasted about 66 days or 73 days to return to full power. Notice that they had twice as long a time to actually work on the 0-ring grooves for the 0-rings, which go between the reactor vessel (below) and the removable reactor vessel (upper) head. And, this time, they didn't get 5 Yz months of use out of the installed 0-ring, no, they are getting less than one month of use. Something is wrong here. How many U.S. plants have to stop a run to fix reactor head 0-rings?

How many U.S. plants have to stop to fix their reactor head 0-rings after each refuel outage as is the current Entergy/Indian Point 3 practice?

believe the answer is none and none. So let me put it this way. I believe the current condition of the Entergy/Indian Point Unit 3 plant is UNSAFE to return to operation with just the installation of another set of 0-rings.

I am requesting that the US NRC keep Entergy/Indian Point 3 shutdown cold until the condition of the upper surface of the reactor vessel, including 0-ring grooves be proved to be identical to the as purchased condition

. (In particular, make sure you look for steam cutting.)

And, I am requesting that the US NRC keep Entergy/Indian Point 3 shutdown cold until the condition of the lower surface of the upper head is found to be identical to the as purchased condition

. This is a 2.206 request. Thank you, Tom Gurdziel I x K, Virus-free.

www.avast.com 1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17163A254&oldid=751879"