ML12299A089: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Beaver Valley Unit 2 Exam Outline Comments RO 301-1 All four JPMs are the same as the 2010 final outline. Response:
{{#Wiki_filter:Beaver Valley Unit 2 Exam Outline Comments RO 301-1 All four JPMs are the same as the 2010 final outline.
Outline and JPMs were submitted for the 2010 exam but no RO applicants took the exam. Therefore the were not used. However, the outline (and the draft version of the JPMs) were entered into ADAMS and were accessible to the public. Will treat new outline as if 2010 RO admin JPMs exam were administered.
Response: Outline and JPMs were submitted for the 2010 exam but no RO applicants took the exam. Therefore the ~IPMs were not used. However, the outline (and the draft version of the JPMs) were entered into ADAMS and were accessible to the public. Will treat new outline as if 2010 RO admin JPMs exam were administered. Outline will be revised for the 45 day submittal.
Outline will be revised for the 45 day submittal.
Written Exam Outline Comments Same KlAs from last exam: 1,41,53,67,70, 72,91 Same KlAs from 2008 exam: 44, 53, 70, 72, 74, 99 Based up the two comments above, the licensee was directed to re-select KlAs for Q's 53, 70, 72 and any three other questions of their choice.
Written Exam Outline Comments Same KlAs from last exam: 1,41,53,67,70, 72,91 Same KlAs from 2008 exam: 44, 53, 70, 72, 74, 99 Based up the two comments above, the licensee was directed to re-select KlAs for Q's 53, 72 and any three other questions of their Three questions related to natural circulation:
Three questions related to natural circulation: 2, 11, 26 -licensee will review questions for similarity.
2, 11, 26 -licensee will review questions There are three questions related to refueling:
There are three questions related to refueling: 19, 62, 92 - licensee will review questions for similarity.
19, 62, 92 -licensee will review questions Scenario Scenario No Scenario Events 4&5: Should be combined.
Scenario Comments/Questions Scenario 1 No comment.
Response -will Scenario Event 2: What are the RO/BOP actions? Response:
Scenario 2 Events 4&5: Should be combined. Response - will combine.
None. Will change D-1 to reflect Estimated run time? Response:
Scenario 3 Event 2: What are the RO/BOP actions? Response: None. Will change D-1 to reflect change.
Will monitor during Scenario Events 1 &2 are linked therefore 7 vs 8 malfunctions on Form ES 301-4. Response:
Estimated run time? Response: Will monitor during validation.
Agree. change form to reflect Scenario Event 9: May go away if manual SI occurs as a result of Event 6. Response -Possibility but will keep it in the D-1 Beaver Valley 2 Operating Test Admin SRO A.1.2: Replace -too SRO A.4: Replace with post scenario classification and notification form completion proposed EPlan JPM was essentially the same as SRO written Question Simulator S1: Remove erratic MFRV operation from S3: Add note about reactor engineering to use board indications and add cue to inform that source range voltage will be checked by another S5: In Step 7 change note to indicate 15 gallon/% instead of S6: Add cue at Step 9 to reduce EDG load to 100 KW over five S7: Step 7 not critical.
Scenario 4 Events 1&2 are linked therefore 7 vs 8 malfunctions on Form ES 301-4. Response: Agree. Will change form to reflect comment.
Increase initial level of RWST to avoid auto start of S8: Add steps about re-establishing RHR flow depending upon applicant In-plant No Scenario 1 Event 4: Add failure of MOV 113A to automatically Scenario 1 Event 5: Add wording about possible entry into AOP for loss of instrument Scenario 2 Event 3: Add description of emergency boration for down Scenario 3 Event 3: Change so that atmospheric steam dump valve will close in manual. eliminates a real-time Tech Spec call but examiners can ask Tech Spec follow-up post-scenario.
Scenario 5 Event 9: May go away if manual SI occurs as a result of Event 6. Response - Possibility exists but will keep it in the D-1 form.
With this in mind, this scenario may be designated as the Scenario 4: No Scenario 5: No}}
 
Beaver Valley 2 Operating Test Comments Admin JPMs SRO A.1.2: Replace - too simplistic.
SRO A.4: Replace with post scenario classification and notification form completion because proposed EPlan JPM was essentially the same as SRO written Question 77.
Simulator JPMs S1: Remove erratic MFRV operation from IC.
S3: Add note about reactor engineering to use board indications and add cue to inform applicant that source range voltage will be checked by another operator.
S5: In Step 7 change note to indicate 15 gallon/% instead of 14.
S6: Add cue at Step 9 to reduce EDG load to 100 KW over five minutes.
S7: Step 7 not critical. Increase initial level of RWST to avoid auto start of pump.
S8: Add steps about re-establishing RHR flow depending upon applicant action.
In-plant JPMs No comments.
Scenarios Scenario 1 Event 4: Add failure of MOV 113A to automatically open.
Scenario 1 Event 5: Add wording about possible entry into AOP for loss of instrument air.
Scenario 2 Event 3: Add description of emergency boration for down power.
Scenario 3 Event 3: Change so that atmospheric steam dump valve will close in manual. This eliminates a real-time Tech Spec call but examiners can ask Tech Spec follow-up questions post-scenario. With this in mind, this scenario may be designated as the backup.
Scenario 4: No comments.
Scenario 5: No comments.}}

Latest revision as of 21:59, 11 November 2019

NRC Comments on Draft Licensee-Developed Exam (Operating) (Folder 2)
ML12299A089
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 08/31/2012
From: David Silk
Operations Branch I
To: Rudolph W
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
Jackson D
Shared Package
ML12136A033 List:
References
TAC MEU01850
Download: ML12299A089 (2)
v • d • e


Text

Beaver Valley Unit 2 Exam Outline Comments RO 301-1 All four JPMs are the same as the 2010 final outline.

Response: Outline and JPMs were submitted for the 2010 exam but no RO applicants took the exam. Therefore the ~IPMs were not used. However, the outline (and the draft version of the JPMs) were entered into ADAMS and were accessible to the public. Will treat new outline as if 2010 RO admin JPMs exam were administered. Outline will be revised for the 45 day submittal.

Written Exam Outline Comments Same KlAs from last exam: 1,41,53,67,70, 72,91 Same KlAs from 2008 exam: 44, 53, 70, 72, 74, 99 Based up the two comments above, the licensee was directed to re-select KlAs for Q's 53, 70, 72 and any three other questions of their choice.

Three questions related to natural circulation: 2, 11, 26 -licensee will review questions for similarity.

There are three questions related to refueling: 19, 62, 92 - licensee will review questions for similarity.

Scenario Comments/Questions Scenario 1 No comment.

Scenario 2 Events 4&5: Should be combined. Response - will combine.

Scenario 3 Event 2: What are the RO/BOP actions? Response: None. Will change D-1 to reflect change.

Estimated run time? Response: Will monitor during validation.

Scenario 4 Events 1&2 are linked therefore 7 vs 8 malfunctions on Form ES 301-4. Response: Agree. Will change form to reflect comment.

Scenario 5 Event 9: May go away if manual SI occurs as a result of Event 6. Response - Possibility exists but will keep it in the D-1 form.

Beaver Valley 2 Operating Test Comments Admin JPMs SRO A.1.2: Replace - too simplistic.

SRO A.4: Replace with post scenario classification and notification form completion because proposed EPlan JPM was essentially the same as SRO written Question 77.

Simulator JPMs S1: Remove erratic MFRV operation from IC.

S3: Add note about reactor engineering to use board indications and add cue to inform applicant that source range voltage will be checked by another operator.

S5: In Step 7 change note to indicate 15 gallon/% instead of 14.

S6: Add cue at Step 9 to reduce EDG load to 100 KW over five minutes.

S7: Step 7 not critical. Increase initial level of RWST to avoid auto start of pump.

S8: Add steps about re-establishing RHR flow depending upon applicant action.

In-plant JPMs No comments.

Scenarios Scenario 1 Event 4: Add failure of MOV 113A to automatically open.

Scenario 1 Event 5: Add wording about possible entry into AOP for loss of instrument air.

Scenario 2 Event 3: Add description of emergency boration for down power.

Scenario 3 Event 3: Change so that atmospheric steam dump valve will close in manual. This eliminates a real-time Tech Spec call but examiners can ask Tech Spec follow-up questions post-scenario. With this in mind, this scenario may be designated as the backup.

Scenario 4: No comments.

Scenario 5: No comments.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12299A089&oldid=2092897"