ML101720456: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:-1 " ., , _', ;SRep" Reply Forward | {{#Wiki_filter:-1" ., , _', ; | ||
' | Related 0 | ||
SRep" Reply Forward o etýo fD-elete 'reat Other.. | |||
Blair, Ro'; 'D6ug Clappýappro,sena'egov'; | Bock !LD CJeo' POllon Mawas ele Ac eo n-s Up Jo'ea d 'I et From: Powell,'Amy Sent: Tue3i30/2010 6:17 PIl To: PoweU,Amy, Cc: | ||
'Carrie Aostolou'; | ~r.ailhouse~go': | ||
'Spencer, Peter': | *Bcc 'aete.modaff.mailhouse.gov:; | ||
'Haynes, Laura (Carper)'; | 'Caputo, Anne (EPWY; e Cones, | ||
Freedhoff, Michal' 'atthew,'s, Kate'; 'Spring, Andrea', Neumayr, Ma'y; 'Baron, Jeff: 'Cherry, Dai'; 'cDonouqh, Alexander ,e.y: 'Crsinz., Oayle tReioY, 'Story, Tod'; 'grogfacchiaiooinail house gov': JohIn 'ivenoign oe'atego ':'matt.mortisemail ,housegov','Sha',. Andrer(Eosgo)'; | 'aes, Kevin'Approps)'; Blair,Ro'; 'D6ug Clappýappro,sena'egov'; 'Carrie Aostolou'; 'Spencer, Peter': | ||
'Consolvo, B'andon '"nsign)'" 'Shar'on R1abornredlsenateigov': | 'Dedrick,Kathy 'P'P,; 'Biscon, Giulia(Carper)'; 'Haynes, Laura (Carper)'; Freedhoff, Michal''atthew,'s, Kate'; 'Spring,Andrea',Neumayr,Ma'y; 'Baron,Jeff: | ||
'Agostisi, Karen'; 'Fovier, Sam (nerg'iv; vh'valenhire-energysenate.go.'; | 'Cherry, Dai'; 'cDonouqh, Alexander ,e.y: 'Crsinz., Oayle tReioY, 'Story, Tod'; 'grogfacchiaiooinail house gov': JohIn 'ivenoign oe'atego ':'matt.mortisemail,housegov', | ||
+/-1 | 'Sha',. Andrer(Eosgo)'; 'Consolvo,B'andon '"nsign)'" 'Shar'on R1abornredlsenateigov': 'Agostisi,Karen';'Fovier, Sam (nerg'iv; vh'valenhire-energysenate.go.'; | ||
+/-1 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
NRCstaff responses to 3 petitions in Y'i proceeding J ~essaot' -. Sta~tAnswer SouthCarolina Intervention Petition.pdl 133KB,iý~ Staff Answher Washington Intervention Petition.pdf :16 KBI I )Staf Answer Aiken Countylotervention PetitionPdlf 224KB)i "rI' | |||
:16 KBI I )Staf Answer Aiken Countylotervention PetitionPdlf | *.. | ||
The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition In shorto the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State. local governmental body. and affected. | Attached are the three filings from the NRC staff in response to the WA. SC, and Aiken County petitions to intervene. The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition In shorto the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State. local governmental body. and affected. Federally-recognized Indian Tribe" without standing or admissable contention. The presiding officer (inthis case. the lead judge) makes the call to admit interested governmental participants. Here is a link to the full section of regulation on this option: hhttpYwwv, nrc qovireadinI-rm.,'doc.collectionstcfr:part002ipanrtO2.031 5.htmi (c) is the relevant subsection. | ||
Federally-recognized Indian Tribe" without standing or admissable contention. | To wrap up on this three volume set of e-mail. WA. SC. and Aiken County now have 10 days to reply to the parties' responses Parties who have not yet responded to NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community's petitions have until April 9th to do so Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission A Office 6f Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 | ||
The presiding officer ( | |||
Here is a link to the full section of regulation on this option: hhttpYwwv, nrc qovireadinI-rm.,'doc.collectionstcfr:part002ipanrtO2.031 5.htmi (c) is the relevant subsection. | Powell, Amy From: Powell, Amy Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 6:17 PM To: Powell, Amy | ||
To wrap up on this three volume set of e-mail. WA. SC. and Aiken County now have 10 days to reply to the parties' responses Parties who have not yet responded to NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community's petitions have until April 9th to do so | |||
Powell, Amy From: Powell, Amy Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 6:17 PM To: Powell, Amy | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
NRC staff responses to 3 petitions in YM proceeding Attachments: | NRC staff responses to 3 petitions in YM proceeding Attachments: Staff Answer South Carolina Intervention Petition.pdf; Staff Answer Washington Intervention Petition.pdf; Staff Answer Aiken County Intervention Petition.pdf Attached are the three filings from the NRC staff in response to the WA, SC, and Aiken County petitions to intervene. The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition. In short, the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants. This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State, local governmental body, and affected, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe" without standing or admissable contention. The presiding officer (in this case, the lead judge) makes the call to admit interested governmental participants. Here is a link to the full section of regulation on this option: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part002/partOO2-0315.html (c) is the relevant subsection. | ||
Staff Answer South Carolina Intervention Petition.pdf; Staff Answer Washington Intervention Petition.pdf; Staff Answer Aiken County Intervention Petition.pdf Attached are the three filings from the NRC staff in response to the WA, SC, and Aiken County petitions to intervene. | To wrap up on this three volume set of e-mail, WA, SC, and Aiken County now have 10 days to reply to the parties' responses. Parties who have not yet responded to NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community's petitions have until April 9th to do so. | ||
The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition. | Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1}} | ||
In short, the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants. | |||
This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State, local governmental body, and affected, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe" without standing or admissable contention. | |||
The presiding officer (in this case, the lead judge) makes the call to admit interested governmental participants. | |||
Here is a link to the full section of regulation on this option: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part002/partOO2-0315.html (c) is the relevant subsection. | |||
To wrap up on this three volume set of e-mail, WA, SC, and Aiken County now have 10 days to reply to the parties' responses. | |||
Parties who have not yet responded to NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community's petitions have until April 9th to do so.Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1}} | |||
Revision as of 17:53, 13 November 2019
| ML101720456 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island, 06300001  |
| Issue date: | 03/30/2010 |
| From: | Amy Powell Office of Congressional Affairs |
| To: | Amy Powell Office of Congressional Affairs |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2010-0199 | |
| Download: ML101720456 (2) | |
Text
-1" ., , _', ;
Related 0
SRep" Reply Forward o etýo fD-elete 'reat Other..
Bock !LD CJeo' POllon Mawas ele Ac eo n-s Up Jo'ea d 'I et From: Powell,'Amy Sent: Tue3i30/2010 6:17 PIl To: PoweU,Amy, Cc:
~r.ailhouse~go':
- Bcc 'aete.modaff.mailhouse.gov:;
'Caputo, Anne (EPWY; e Cones,
'aes, Kevin'Approps)'; Blair,Ro'; 'D6ug Clappýappro,sena'egov'; 'Carrie Aostolou'; 'Spencer, Peter':
'Dedrick,Kathy 'P'P,; 'Biscon, Giulia(Carper)'; 'Haynes, Laura (Carper)'; Freedhoff, Michalatthew,'s, Kate'; 'Spring,Andrea',Neumayr,Ma'y; 'Baron,Jeff:
'Cherry, Dai'; 'cDonouqh, Alexander ,e.y: 'Crsinz., Oayle tReioY, 'Story, Tod'; 'grogfacchiaiooinail house gov': JohIn 'ivenoign oe'atego ':'matt.mortisemail,housegov',
'Sha',. Andrer(Eosgo)'; 'Consolvo,B'andon '"nsign)'" 'Shar'on R1abornredlsenateigov': 'Agostisi,Karen';'Fovier, Sam (nerg'iv; vh'valenhire-energysenate.go.';
+/-1
Subject:
NRCstaff responses to 3 petitions in Y'i proceeding J ~essaot' -. Sta~tAnswer SouthCarolina Intervention Petition.pdl 133KB,iý~ Staff Answher Washington Intervention Petition.pdf :16 KBI I )Staf Answer Aiken Countylotervention PetitionPdlf 224KB)i "rI'
- ..
Attached are the three filings from the NRC staff in response to the WA. SC, and Aiken County petitions to intervene. The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition In shorto the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State. local governmental body. and affected. Federally-recognized Indian Tribe" without standing or admissable contention. The presiding officer (inthis case. the lead judge) makes the call to admit interested governmental participants. Here is a link to the full section of regulation on this option: hhttpYwwv, nrc qovireadinI-rm.,'doc.collectionstcfr:part002ipanrtO2.031 5.htmi (c) is the relevant subsection.
To wrap up on this three volume set of e-mail. WA. SC. and Aiken County now have 10 days to reply to the parties' responses Parties who have not yet responded to NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community's petitions have until April 9th to do so Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission A Office 6f Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673
Powell, Amy From: Powell, Amy Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 6:17 PM To: Powell, Amy
Subject:
NRC staff responses to 3 petitions in YM proceeding Attachments: Staff Answer South Carolina Intervention Petition.pdf; Staff Answer Washington Intervention Petition.pdf; Staff Answer Aiken County Intervention Petition.pdf Attached are the three filings from the NRC staff in response to the WA, SC, and Aiken County petitions to intervene. The staff did separate responses to each to address specific issues related to standing and contentions discussed in each petition. In short, the NRC staff opposes the petitioners' requests to intervene as a party but would not object to them participating as interested government participants. This option of participation is outlined in 10 CFR Part 2.315(c) and allows "an interested State, local governmental body, and affected, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe" without standing or admissable contention. The presiding officer (in this case, the lead judge) makes the call to admit interested governmental participants. Here is a link to the full section of regulation on this option: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part002/partOO2-0315.html (c) is the relevant subsection.
To wrap up on this three volume set of e-mail, WA, SC, and Aiken County now have 10 days to reply to the parties' responses. Parties who have not yet responded to NARUC and Prairie Island Indian Community's petitions have until April 9th to do so.
Amy Amy Powell Associate Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Congressional Affairs Phone: 301-415-1673 1