ML093410138: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML093410138
| number = ML093410138
| issue date = 12/07/2009
| issue date = 12/07/2009
| title = 2009/12/07 Indian Point Lr Hearing - Confirmation Request
| title = Lr Hearing - Confirmation Request
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 IPRenewal NPEmails From: Stuyvenberg, Andrew Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 11:30 AM To: Gray, Dara F Cc: IPRenewal NPEmails
{{#Wiki_filter:IPRenewal NPEmails From:                     Stuyvenberg, Andrew Sent:                     Monday, December 07, 2009 11:30 AM To:                       Gray, Dara F Cc:                       IPRenewal NPEmails


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Confirmation requestDara - in reviewing the latest aquatic data submission, we've noticed that it appears that you all have not applied any correction factors to the seasonal aquatic data from the annual reports from years 1981 and 1986, while you have done so for the other years. Please confirm that including this data without a correction factor for these two years was intentional, and, if you can, please let me know why (I seem to recall a discussion as to why some data may have been uncorrected, but I don't recall whether that applied to these two years in this data submission). I don't believe it's a problem, but we want to make sure we understand the data you've sent as we move forward.  
Confirmation request Dara - in reviewing the latest aquatic data submission, we've noticed that it appears that you all have not applied any correction factors to the seasonal aquatic data from the annual reports from years 1981 and 1986, while you have done so for the other years. Please confirm that including this data without a correction factor for these two years was intentional, and, if you can, please let me know why (I seem to recall a discussion as to why some data may have been uncorrected, but I don't recall whether that applied to these two years in this data submission). I don't believe it's a problem, but we want to make sure we understand the data you've sent as we move forward.
Please call if any of the explanation above is unclear.
Thanks much, Drew Drew Stuyvenberg U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3014154006 Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov 1


Please call if any of the explanation above is unclear. 
Hearing Identifier:   IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:         1881 Mail Envelope Properties  (AF843158D8D87443918BD3AA953ABF7803FEE82149)
 
Thanks much,  Drew
______________________________DrewStuyvenbergU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission301 4154006Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 1881   Mail Envelope Properties  (AF843158D8D87443918BD3AA953ABF7803FEE82149)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Confirmation request Sent Date:   12/7/2009 11:29:42 AM Received Date: 12/7/2009 11:29:44 AM From:   Stuyvenberg, Andrew Created By:   Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov Recipients:     "IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>
Confirmation request Sent Date:           12/7/2009 11:29:42 AM Received Date:       12/7/2009 11:29:44 AM From:                 Stuyvenberg, Andrew Created By:           Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracking Status: None "Gray, Dara F" <DGray@entergy.com>
"IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:   HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov
Tracking Status: None "Gray, Dara F" <DGray@entergy.com>
 
Tracking Status: None Post Office:         HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files                       Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                     929                     12/7/2009 11:29:44 AM Options Priority:                   Standard Return Notification:         No Reply Requested:             No Sensitivity:                 Normal Expiration Date:
Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   929     12/7/2009 11:29:44 AM
Recipients Received:}}
 
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 06:47, 12 March 2020

Lr Hearing - Confirmation Request
ML093410138
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/07/2009
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML093410138 (2)


Text

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Stuyvenberg, Andrew Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 11:30 AM To: Gray, Dara F Cc: IPRenewal NPEmails

Subject:

Confirmation request Dara - in reviewing the latest aquatic data submission, we've noticed that it appears that you all have not applied any correction factors to the seasonal aquatic data from the annual reports from years 1981 and 1986, while you have done so for the other years. Please confirm that including this data without a correction factor for these two years was intentional, and, if you can, please let me know why (I seem to recall a discussion as to why some data may have been uncorrected, but I don't recall whether that applied to these two years in this data submission). I don't believe it's a problem, but we want to make sure we understand the data you've sent as we move forward.

Please call if any of the explanation above is unclear.

Thanks much, Drew Drew Stuyvenberg U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 3014154006 Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 1881 Mail Envelope Properties (AF843158D8D87443918BD3AA953ABF7803FEE82149)

Subject:

Confirmation request Sent Date: 12/7/2009 11:29:42 AM Received Date: 12/7/2009 11:29:44 AM From: Stuyvenberg, Andrew Created By: Andrew.Stuyvenberg@nrc.gov Recipients:

"IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Gray, Dara F" <DGray@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 929 12/7/2009 11:29:44 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: