ML11259A141: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| author name = Provenzano S | | author name = Provenzano S | ||
| author affiliation = Earth Tech, Inc | | author affiliation = Earth Tech, Inc | ||
| addressee name = Rikhoff | | addressee name = Rikhoff J | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR | ||
| docket = 05000272, 05000311, 05000354 | | docket = 05000272, 05000311, 05000354 | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:I, 'A- | {{#Wiki_filter:I, I' | ||
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 7:02 PM To: vRikWh6ff,-Jeffrey | 'A-Rikhoff, Jeffrey From: ,*Proie-rzano, Susdn [SUSAN. PROVENZANO@a-eo0m.com]' | ||
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 7:02 PM To: vRikWh6ff,-Jeffrey | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: Salem-Hope Creek question on taxes Thanks!Susan Provenzano, AICP Environmental Scientist/Planner AEC-,-OM 'Greenville, SC 864-234-3591 From: Rikhoff, Jeffrey [mailto:Jeffrey.Rikhoff(bnrc.qov1 Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:06 AM To: Provenzano, Susan Cc: Eccleston, Charles; Imboden, Andy; Hurley, Bobbie | RE: Salem-Hope Creek question on taxes Thanks! | ||
Susan Provenzano, AICP Environmental Scientist/Planner AEC-,-OM ' | |||
Greenville, SC 864-234-3591 From: Rikhoff, Jeffrey [mailto:Jeffrey.Rikhoff(bnrc.qov1 Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:06 AM To: Provenzano, Susan Cc: Eccleston, Charles; Imboden, Andy; Hurley, Bobbie | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: Salem-Hope Creek question on taxes Hi Susan, In response to your questions: | RE: Salem-Hope Creek question on taxes Hi Susan, In response to your questions: | ||
: 1. I agree, but we should note that tax payments on the EERC would continue even if the license is not renewed. We've made that statement in previous SEISs in similar situations. | : 1. I agree, but we should note that tax payments on the EERC would continue even if the license is not renewed. We've made that statement in previous SEISs in similar situations. | ||
: 2. Since NJ deregulated in 1999, any changes to the tax assessment would have already occurred and should be reflected in the tax payment information provided in the ER and the revised tax information table in the RAI.Let me know if you have any questions. | : 2. Since NJ deregulated in 1999, any changes to the tax assessment would have already occurred and should be reflected in the tax payment information provided in the ER and the revised tax information table in the RAI. | ||
Thanks, Jeff Jeffrey Rikhoff Senior Environmental Scientist Environmental Review Branch Division of License Renewal, NRR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301/415-1090 Jeffrey. Rikhoff(,nrc..qov From: Provenzano, Susan rmailto: SUSAN.PROVENZANOaaecom.com1 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:53 AM To: Rikhoff, Jeffrey | Let me know if you have any questions. | ||
Thanks, Jeff Jeffrey Rikhoff Senior Environmental Scientist Environmental Review Branch Division of License Renewal, NRR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301/415-1090 Jeffrey. Rikhoff(,nrc..qov From: Provenzano, Susan rmailto: SUSAN.PROVENZANOaaecom.com1 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:53 AM To: Rikhoff, Jeffrey | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Salem-Hope Creek question on taxes Jeff, There are a couple of issues that I'd like your advice on. They concern the discussion of taxes in Section 2.2.8.6, Economy, of the SEIS.1) Property taxes paid for the Energy and Environmental Resources Center -I think these taxes should not be addressed in the SEIS because the Center would not be affected by the license renewal decision. | Salem-Hope Creek question on taxes Jeff, | ||
Do you agree?2) Deregulation of the electric power industry -New Jersey deregulated its utility industry in 1999. In my research on this topic, I found no mention of changes in property tax assessment methodologies for utilities or changes in how commercial facilities are depreciated. | |||
This topic was not addressed in the applicant's ERs. What (or who) do you think is the best source of information on how deregulation may affect property taxes paid on Salem and HCGS?We expect to receive the information requested in the RAIs tomorrow (as per Charles). | There are a couple of issues that I'd like your advice on. They concern the discussion of taxes in Section 2.2.8.6, Economy, of the SEIS. | ||
It should include a revised tax information table, and that data will be incorporated into Section 2.2.8.6.Thanks, Susan Susan Provenzano, AICP Environmental Scientist/Planner Environment D 864.234.3591 susan.provenzanoaaecom. | : 1) Property taxes paid for the Energy and Environmental Resources Center - I think these taxes should not be addressed in the SEIS because the Center would not be affected by the license renewal decision. Do you agree? | ||
: 2) Deregulation of the electric power industry - New Jersey deregulated its utility industry in 1999. In my research on this topic, I found no mention of changes in property tax assessment methodologies for utilities or changes in how commercial facilities are depreciated. This topic was not addressed in the applicant's ERs. What (or who) do you think is the best source of information on how deregulation may affect property taxes paid on Salem and HCGS? | |||
We expect to receive the information requested in the RAIs tomorrow (as per Charles). It should include a revised tax information table, and that data will be incorporated into Section 2.2.8.6. | |||
Thanks, Susan Susan Provenzano, AICP Environmental Scientist/Planner Environment D 864.234.3591 susan.provenzanoaaecom.com | |||
,*AECOM 10 Patewood Drive, Bldg VI, Suite 500 Greenville, SC 29615 T 864.234.3000 F 864-234-3069 www.aecom.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. | |||
2}} |
Latest revision as of 14:34, 12 November 2019
ML11259A141 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem, Hope Creek |
Issue date: | 05/03/2010 |
From: | Provenzano S Earth Tech |
To: | Jeffrey Rikhoff Division of License Renewal |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2011-0113 | |
Download: ML11259A141 (2) | |
Text
I, I'
'A-Rikhoff, Jeffrey From: ,*Proie-rzano, Susdn [SUSAN. PROVENZANO@a-eo0m.com]'
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 7:02 PM To: vRikWh6ff,-Jeffrey
Subject:
RE: Salem-Hope Creek question on taxes Thanks!
Susan Provenzano, AICP Environmental Scientist/Planner AEC-,-OM '
Greenville, SC 864-234-3591 From: Rikhoff, Jeffrey [mailto:Jeffrey.Rikhoff(bnrc.qov1 Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:06 AM To: Provenzano, Susan Cc: Eccleston, Charles; Imboden, Andy; Hurley, Bobbie
Subject:
RE: Salem-Hope Creek question on taxes Hi Susan, In response to your questions:
- 1. I agree, but we should note that tax payments on the EERC would continue even if the license is not renewed. We've made that statement in previous SEISs in similar situations.
- 2. Since NJ deregulated in 1999, any changes to the tax assessment would have already occurred and should be reflected in the tax payment information provided in the ER and the revised tax information table in the RAI.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks, Jeff Jeffrey Rikhoff Senior Environmental Scientist Environmental Review Branch Division of License Renewal, NRR U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301/415-1090 Jeffrey. Rikhoff(,nrc..qov From: Provenzano, Susan rmailto: SUSAN.PROVENZANOaaecom.com1 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:53 AM To: Rikhoff, Jeffrey
Subject:
Salem-Hope Creek question on taxes Jeff,
There are a couple of issues that I'd like your advice on. They concern the discussion of taxes in Section 2.2.8.6, Economy, of the SEIS.
- 1) Property taxes paid for the Energy and Environmental Resources Center - I think these taxes should not be addressed in the SEIS because the Center would not be affected by the license renewal decision. Do you agree?
- 2) Deregulation of the electric power industry - New Jersey deregulated its utility industry in 1999. In my research on this topic, I found no mention of changes in property tax assessment methodologies for utilities or changes in how commercial facilities are depreciated. This topic was not addressed in the applicant's ERs. What (or who) do you think is the best source of information on how deregulation may affect property taxes paid on Salem and HCGS?
We expect to receive the information requested in the RAIs tomorrow (as per Charles). It should include a revised tax information table, and that data will be incorporated into Section 2.2.8.6.
Thanks, Susan Susan Provenzano, AICP Environmental Scientist/Planner Environment D 864.234.3591 susan.provenzanoaaecom.com
,*AECOM 10 Patewood Drive, Bldg VI, Suite 500 Greenville, SC 29615 T 864.234.3000 F 864-234-3069 www.aecom.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
2