ML12226A474: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/13/2012
| issue date = 08/13/2012
| title = LIC-109 Acceptance of Palisades LAR Support Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change - ME8944
| title = LIC-109 Acceptance of Palisades LAR Support Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change - ME8944
| author name = Chawla M L
| author name = Chawla M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII-1
| addressee name = Erickson J S, Gustafson O W, Kuemin J L
| addressee name = Erickson J, Gustafson O, Kuemin J
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC
| docket = 05000255
| docket = 05000255
| license number = DPR-020
| license number = DPR-020
| contact person = Chawla M L
| contact person = Chawla M
| case reference number = TAC ME8944
| case reference number = TAC ME8944
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:file:///Cl/
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Chawla, Mahesh Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 11:20 AM To: KUEMIN, JAMES L; ERICKSON, JEFFREY S; GUSTAFSON, OTTO W Cc: Wengert, Thomas
...R%20support%20Cyber%20Security%20Plan%20Implementation%20Schedule%20Change%20-%20ME8944.htm
[8/13/2012 1:29:23 PM]
From:
Chawla, Mahesh Sent:
Monday, August 13, 2012 11:20 AM To:
KUEMIN, JAMES L; ERICKSON, JEFFREY S; GUSTAFSON, OTTO W Cc:
Wengert, Thomas


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
 
LIC-109 Acceptance of Palisades LAR support Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change
LIC-109 Acceptance of Palisades LAR support Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change- ME8944 By letter dated June 20, 2012, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO)(the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Palisades Nuclear Plant (PNP) (ADAMS Accession No. ML121770439).
                                                      - ME8944 By letter dated June 20, 2012, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO)(the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Palisades Nuclear Plant (PNP) (ADAMS Accession No. ML121770439). The proposed LAR would implement the requirements of Implementation Schedule Milestone 6 in a slightly different manner that described in the approved Implementation Schedule. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The proposed LAR would implement the requirements of Implementation Schedule Milestone 6 in a slightly different manner that described in the approved Implementation Schedule.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the resultsof the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff=s detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
=s acceptance review of this LAR.
If you have any questions, please contact the me, at (301) 415 8371 or Mahesh.chawla@nrc.gov.
The acceptance reviewwas performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.
Mac Chawla Project Manager file:///Cl/...R%20support%20Cyber%20Security%20Plan%20Implementation%20Schedule%20Change%20-%20ME8944.htm[8/13/2012 1:29:23 PM]}}
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the applicationhas any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to thelicense (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications.
Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content oftechnical information required.
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operatingcharacteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review ascompared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance
 
review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff
=s detailed technical reviewby separate correspondence.
 
If you have any questions, please contact the me, at (301) 4158371 or Mahesh.chawla@nrc.gov
.  
 
Mac Chawla Project Manager}}

Latest revision as of 00:47, 12 November 2019

LIC-109 Acceptance of Palisades LAR Support Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change - ME8944
ML12226A474
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/13/2012
From: Mahesh Chawla
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Erickson J, Gustafson O, Kuemin J
Entergy Nuclear Palisades
Chawla M
References
TAC ME8944
Download: ML12226A474 (1)


Text

From: Chawla, Mahesh Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 11:20 AM To: KUEMIN, JAMES L; ERICKSON, JEFFREY S; GUSTAFSON, OTTO W Cc: Wengert, Thomas

Subject:

LIC-109 Acceptance of Palisades LAR support Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change

- ME8944 By letter dated June 20, 2012, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO)(the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Palisades Nuclear Plant (PNP) (ADAMS Accession No. ML121770439). The proposed LAR would implement the requirements of Implementation Schedule Milestone 6 in a slightly different manner that described in the approved Implementation Schedule. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff=s detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact the me, at (301) 415 8371 or Mahesh.chawla@nrc.gov.

Mac Chawla Project Manager file:///Cl/...R%20support%20Cyber%20Security%20Plan%20Implementation%20Schedule%20Change%20-%20ME8944.htm[8/13/2012 1:29:23 PM]