ML17331B061: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 11/12/1993
| issue date = 11/12/1993
| title = Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,deleting TS 5.9.1 & Table 5.9-1,Unit 1 & TS 5.7.1 & Table 5.7-1,Unit 2 of TS Entitled, Component Cyclic or Transient Limits, Per New STS Published by NRC as NUREG-1431,dtd 920928
| title = Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,deleting TS 5.9.1 & Table 5.9-1,Unit 1 & TS 5.7.1 & Table 5.7-1,Unit 2 of TS Entitled, Component Cyclic or Transient Limits, Per New STS Published by NRC as NUREG-1431,dtd 920928
| author name = FITZPATRICK E
| author name = Fitzpatrick E
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| author affiliation = INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
| addressee name = MURLEY T E
| addressee name = Murley T
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
| docket = 05000315, 05000316
| docket = 05000315, 05000316
Line 15: Line 15:
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| page count = 11
| page count = 11
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-,'CCELERA.
{{#Wiki_filter:,'CCELERA. 0                        DOCUMENT MST                  IUTION SYSTEM
0DOCUMENTMSTIUTIONSYSTEM~.~REGUL.RYINFORMATION DISTRIBUT SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9311190273 DOC!DATE:
        ~
93/11/12NOTARIZED:
          .     ~     REGUL.     RY INFORMATION      DISTRIBUT     SYSTEM (RIDS)
YESDOCKET¹FACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit1,IndianaM0500031550-316DonaldC.CookNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2,IndianaM05000316AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION FIYZPATRICK,E.
ACCESSION NBR:9311190273                 DOC!DATE: 93/11/12      NOTARIZED: YES            DOCKET  ¹ FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana                      M  05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana                      M  05000316 AUTH. NAME                AUTHOR  AFFILIATION FIYZPATRICK,E.             Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana            S Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME                 RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.                 Document Control Branch (Document           Control Desk)
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.(formerly IndianaSMichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.
DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Application foramendstolicensesDPR-58SDPR-74,deleting TS5.9.16Table5.9-1,Unit 16TS5.7.1&Table5.7-1,Unit 2ofTSentitled, "Component CyclicorTransient Limits,"pernewSTSpublished byNRCasNUREG-1431,dtd 920928.DISTRIBUTION CODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR JENCL/SIZE:0+TITLE:ORSubmittal:
Application for amends to licenses DPR-58 S DPR-74,deleting TS 5.9.1 6 Table 5.9-1,Unit 1 6 TS 5.7.1 & Table 5.7-1,Unit                           D 2 of TS entitled, "Component Cyclic or Transient Limits,"
GeneralDistribution NOTES:DRECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LAWETZEL,BINTERNAL:
per new STS published by NRC as NUREG-1431,dtd 920928.
NRR/DE/EELB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB 0&/BBBGB.EGFLE01EXTERNAL:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOOID TITLE:    OR COPIES RECEIVED:LTR Submittal: General Distribution                  J  ENCL  /   SIZE:   0 +
NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL1122111111101111RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DORS/OTSB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2NSICCOPIESLTTRENCL111111111011DDDDNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
NOTES:
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE}CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMPl-31(EXT.504-2065)
RECIPIENT              COPIES              RECIPIENT          COPIES ID CODE/NAME              LTTR ENCL        ID  CODE/NAME       LTTR ENCL              D PD3-1 LA                      1      1      PD3-1 PD              1    1 WETZEL,B                      2      2                                                  D INTERNAL: NRR/DE/EELB                       1      1      NRR/DORS/OTSB          1    1 NRR/DRCH/HICB                 1      1      NRR/DSSA/SPLB          1    1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB                1      1      NUDOCS-ABSTRACT       1    1 0&/BBBGB    .                1      0      OGC/HDS2              1    0 EG F  LE        01        1      1 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR                          1      1      NSIC                  1    1 D
TOELIMINATE YOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSFORDOCUMENTS YOUDON'TNEED1DTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
D D
LTTR15ENCL13 IndianaMichiga~~
NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PowerCompan~P.O.Box16631Columbus, OH43216AEP:NRC:0980U DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2DocketNos.50-315and50-316LicenseNos.DPR-58andDPR-74TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGEREQUESTrDELETIONOFCOMPONENT CYCLICORTRANSIENT LIMITTABLEU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Attn:T.E.MurleyNovember12,1993
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE} CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-31 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR                    15  ENCL    13


==DearDr.Murley:==
Indiana Michiga~~
Thisletteranditsattachments constitute anapplication foramendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/S)fortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnits1and2inaccordance with10CFR50.90.TheproposedchangedeletesT/S5.9.1andTable5.9-1(Unit1)andT/S5.7.1andTable5.7-1(Unit2)oftheT/S,entitled"Component CyclicorTransient Limits."Thischangeisconsistent withthenewStandardTechnical Specifications forWestinghouse Plants,published bytheNRCasNUREG1431,datedSeptember 28,1992.Attachment 1providesadetaileddescription oftheproposedchange,thejustification forthechange,andourproposeddetermination ofnosignificant hazardsconsideration performed pursuantto10CFR50.92.Attachment 2containstheexistingT/Spagesmarkedtoreflecttheproposedchange.Attachment 3containstheproposed, revisedT/Spages.Webelievethattheproposedchangewillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.
Power Compan~
TheproposedchangehasbeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andbytheNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee.
P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 AEP:NRC:0980U Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units        1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUESTr DELETION OF COMPONENT CYCLIC OR TRANSIENT LIMIT TABLE U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Attn: T.           E. Murley November 12, 1993
Incompliance withtherequirements of10CFR50.91(b)(l),
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.J.R.PadgettoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andtotheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.93i1190273 931112PDR'ADOCK05000315PPDR
''h4 Dr.T.E.MurleyAEP:NRCt0980U Thisletterissubmitted pursuantto10CFR50.30(b)and,assuch,anoathstatement isattached.
Sincerely, E.E.Fitz.trickVicePresident drAttachments cc:A.A.Blind-BridgmanG.CharnoffJ.B.Martin>>RegionIIINFEMSectionChiefNRCResidentInspector
-BridgmanJ.R.Padgett STATEOFOHIO)COUNTYOFFRANKLIN)
E.E.Fitzpatrick, beingdulysworn,deposesandsaysthatheistheVicePresident oflicenseeIndianaMichiganPowerCompany,thathehasreadtheforegoing Technical Specification ChangeRequest:DeletionofComponent CyclicorTransient LimitTableandknowsthecontentsthereof;andthatsaidcontentsaretruetothebestofhisknowledge andbelief.Subscribed andsworntomebeforethisdayofNOTARYUBLIC~anAo.Htlt.~NOTARYPUBLIC.STATOFOHIOAYCOhihIISSION EXPIRE ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:0980U 10CFR50.92ANALYSZSFORCHANGESTOTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTUNZTS1AND2TECHNZCAL SPECZFZCATZONS Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0980U Page1DESCRIPTION OFCHANGESWeproposetodeletefromthetechnical specifications (T/S)T/S5.9.1/Table 5.9-1(Unit1)andT/S5.7.1/Table 5.7-1(Unit2),entitled"Component CyclicorTransient Limits."ThelimitsoftheseT/Swouldberelocated totheUFSAR,andwouldbeadministratively controlled.
Additionally, theIndexSectionisrevisedaccordingly.
REASONFORTHECHANGEThechangeachievesconsistency withthenewStandardT/SforWestinghouse Plants,published bytheNRCasNUREG1431onSeptember 28,1992.Thetablecontainscyclicandtransient limitsforthereactorcoolantandsecondary systems.Forexample,thetableliststhenumberofheatupandcooldowncyclesthereactorcoolantsystemmayundergo,aswellasthenumberofhydrostatic pressureteststhereactorcoolantsystemandsecondary systemmayundergo.Althoughlimitsareprovidedinthetable,therearenospecificlimitingconditions foroperation oractionstatements provided.
NUREG1431wastheresultofatechnical specification improvement programundertaken bytheNRCandthenuclearindustry.
Oneoftheresultsoftheprogramwasthestreamlining oftheT/Sbyremovalofrequirements thatwerebetterlocatedelsewhere.
ThechangesallowedthenewT/Stobemoreclearlyfocusedonthoserequirements necessary tosupportthesafetyanalyses, versusrequirements invogueatthetimeofplantlicensing.
Fourgeneralcriterion wereusedtodetermine ifarecpirement fromtheformerStandardT/SwouldremaininthenewStandardT/S.Thesecriterion involve:1~Installed instrumentation thatisusedtodetect,andindicateinthecontrolroom,asignificant abnormaldegradation ofthereactorcoolantpressureboundary.
2~Aprocessvariablethatisaninitialcondition ofadesignbasisaccidentortransient analysisthateither'assumesthefailureoforpresentsachallenge totheintegrity ofafissionproductbarrier.3~Astructure, system,orcomponent thatispartoftheprimarysuccesspathandwhichfunctions oractuatestomitigateadesignbasis'accident ortransient thateitherassumesthefailureoforpresentsachallenge totheintegrity ofafissionproductbarrier.4.Equipment thatprobabilistic riskassessment oroperating experience hasshowntobeimportant topublichealthandsafety.
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0980U Page2TheT/Sandtableweareproposing toremovecontainscomponent cyclicandtransient limits.Thetableisessentially arequirement forrecordkeeping regarding thenumberofcyclesortransients thathavebeenexperienced bythereactorcoolantorsecondary systems.Znthissense,therequirements areadministrative innature,andclearlydidnotmeetanyofthecriterialistedabove.Thus,thetablewasnotincludedinthenewStandardT/S.RemovalofthetablefromtheT/Swillstreamline thedocument, andwillhelptoachievetheappropriate focusofthedocument.
3~JUSTIFICATION FORTHECHANGEThechangeisconsistent withthenewStandardT/Sgaspublished inNUREG1431.Znthissense,thechangehasalreadybeenreviewedandfoundacceptable bytheNRC.TherearenoCookNuclearPlantspecificfeaturesthatwouldmakethechangenotapplicable.
Thereisalreadyaplantprocedure thatverifiesthattherequirements oftheT/Stableareimplemented.
Thetablecurrently intheT/Swillberelocated totheUFSAR.Anotewillbeaddedtotheprocedure toensurethatanychangestothecomponent cyclicortransient limitsundergoanunreviewed safetycpxestlon determination pertheretirements of10CFR50.59.Per10CFR50.59,thechangecanonlybemadeifthechangedoesnot:increasetheprobability ofoccurrence orconsequences ofanaccidentormalfunction ofequipment important tosafetypreviously evaluated inthesafetyanalysisreport,2.createthepossibility foranaccidentormalfunction ofadifferent typethananyevaluated previously inthesafetyanalysisreport,or3~reducethemarginofsafetyasdefinedinthebasisforanyT/S.Anychangestotherequirements ofthepresenttablewouldhavetopassthestringent criteriaof10CFR50.59inordertobeimplemented.


Attachment 1toAEP:NRC:0980U Page34~10CFR50.92CRITERIAPer10CFR50.92,aproposedamendment doesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration ifthechangedoesnot:involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, 2~createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated, or3~involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Criterion 1Theproposedchangeisadministrative innatureinthatitsimplyrelocates atablecontaining component cyclicandtransient limitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Anychangetotherequirements ofthetablewouldhavetobereviewedagainstthecriteriaof10CFR50.59toensurethechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewed safetyquestion.
==Dear Dr. Murley:==
Additionally, itisnotedthatthechangeisconsistent withthenewStandardT/S,recentlyissuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Basedontheseconsiderations, theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
 
Criterion 2Thechangeonlyinvolvesrelocation ofatablecontaining component cyclicandtransient limitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Nospecificphysicalchangestotheplantorchangesinplantoperation willresultdirectlyfromthischange.Anychangeinthelimitscontained inthecurrenttablewillundergoareviewagainsttherequirements of10CFR50.59toensurethatthechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewed safetyquestion.
This      letter and      its  attachments constitute an application for amendment to the Technical Specifications (T/S) for the Donald C.
Thus,thechangewillnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90.
Criterion 3Theproposedchangeisadministrative innatureinthatitsimplyrelocates atablecontaining component cyclicandtransient limitsfromtheT/StotheUFSAR.Anychangetotherequirements ofthetablewouldhavetobereviewedagainstthecriteriaof10CFR50.59toensurethechangedoesnotcreateanunreviewed safetyquestion.
The proposed change deletes T/S 5.9.1 and Table 5.9-1 (Unit 1) and T/S 5.7.1 and Table 5.7-1 (Unit 2) of the T/S, entitled "Component Cyclic or Transient Limits." This change is consistent with the new Standard Technical Specifications for Westinghouse Plants, published by the NRC as NUREG 1431, dated September 28, 1992.
Additionally, itisnotedthatthechangeisconsistent withthenewStandardT/S,recentlyissuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Basedontheseconsiderations, theproposedchangedoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.
Attachment          1 provides a detailed description of the proposed change,        the justification for the change, and our proposed determination of no significant hazards consideration performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92. Attachment 2 contains the existing T/S pages marked to reflect the proposed change. Attachment 3 contains the proposed, revised T/S pages.
Attachment 1toAEP:NRC!0980UPage4Lastly,wenotethattheNRChasprovidedguidanceconcerning thedetermination ofsignificant hazardsbyproviding certainexamples(48FR14870)ofamendments considered notlikelytoinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration.
We    believe that the proposed change will not result in (1) a significant change in the types of effluents or a significant increase in the amount of any effluents that may be released offsite, or (2) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
Thesixthoftheseexamplesreferstochangeswhichmayresultinsomeincreasetotheprobability orconsecpences ofapreviously evaluated
The proposed change has been reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and by the Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee.
: accident, buttheresultsofwhicharewithinacceptable limits.Asdiscussed above,theremovalofthecyclicandtransient limittablefromtheT/Sisconsistent withthenewStandardT/S,issuedbytheNRCasNUREG1431.Sincethechangehasalreadybeenfoundacceptable bytheNRC,weconcludethattheexamplecitedisapplicable andthatthechangeshouldnotinvolvesignificant hazardsconsideration.}}
In compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.91(b)(l), copies of this letter and its attachments have been transmitted to Mr. J. R. Padgett of the Michigan Public Service Commission and to the Michigan Department of Public Health.
93i1190273 931112 PDR  'ADOCK 05000315 P                  PDR
 
h 4
 
Dr. T. E. Murley                                          AEP:NRCt0980U This letter is submitted pursuant to  10 CFR 50.30(b) and, as such, an oath statement is attached.
Sincerely, E. E. Fitz trick Vice President dr Attachments cc:  A. A. Blind  Bridgman G. Charnoff J. B. Martin >> Region  III NFEM Section Chief NRC Resident Inspector  Bridgman J. R. Padgett
 
STATE OF OHIO)
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN)
E. E. Fitzpatrick, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the Vice President of licensee Indiana Michigan Power Company,  that he has read the foregoing Technical Specification Change Request: Deletion of Component Cyclic or Transient Limit Table and knows the contents thereof; and that said contents are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn to  me before this day of NOTARY      UBLIC
                                              ~ anA o.      Htlt.
                                        ~  NOTARY PUBLIC. STAT OF OHIO AY COhihIISSION EXPIRE
 
ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0980U 10 CFR 50.92 ANALYSZS FOR CHANGES TO THE DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNZTS 1 AND 2 TECHNZCAL SPECZFZCATZONS to  AEP:NRC:0980U                                  Page 1 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES We  propose to delete from the technical specifications (T/S) T/S 5.9.1/Table 5.9-1 (Unit 1) and T/S 5.7.1/Table 5.7-1 (Unit 2),
entitled "Component Cyclic or Transient Limits." The limits of these T/S would be relocated to the UFSAR, and would be administratively controlled. Additionally, the Index Section is revised accordingly.
REASON FOR THE CHANGE The change achieves consistency with the new Standard T/S for Westinghouse Plants, published by the NRC as NUREG 1431 on September 28, 1992. The table contains cyclic and transient limits for the reactor coolant and secondary systems. For example, the table lists the number of heatup and cooldown cycles the reactor coolant system may undergo, as well as the number of hydrostatic pressure tests the reactor coolant system and secondary system may undergo. Although limits are provided in the table, there are no specific limiting conditions for operation or action statements provided.
NUREG  1431 was the result of a technical specification improvement program undertaken by the NRC and the nuclear industry. One of the results of the program was the streamlining of the T/S by removal of requirements that were better located elsewhere. The changes allowed the new T/S to be more clearly focused on those requirements necessary to support the safety analyses, versus requirements in vogue at the time of plant licensing. Four general criterion were used to determine    if a recpirement from the former Standard T/S  would  remain in the new Standard T/S. These criterion involve:
1~    Installed instrumentation that is used to detect, and indicate in the control room, a significant abnormal degradation of the reactor coolant pressure boundary.
2~    A process variable that is an initial condition of a design basis accident or transient analysis that either
            'assumes the failure of or presents a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier.
3~    A  structure, system, or  component that  is part of the primary success path and which functions    or actuates to mitigate a design basis 'accident or transient that either assumes the failure of or presents a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier.
: 4. Equipment    that  probabilistic  risk    assessment  or operating experience has    shown  to  be  important to public health and safety.
 
Attachment  1  to  AEP:NRC:0980U                                  Page 2 The T/S and    table we are proposing to remove contains component cyclic and      transient limits.      The table is essentially        a requirement for recordkeeping regarding        the  number  of cycles  or transients that have been experienced by the reactor coolant or secondary    systems.      Zn this    sense,    the requirements are administrative in nature, and clearly did not meet any of the criteria listed above. Thus, the table was not included in the new Standard T/S. Removal of the table from the T/S will streamline the document, and will help to achieve the appropriate focus of the document.
3~ JUSTIFICATION    FOR THE CHANGE The change  is consistent with the new Standard T/Sg as published in NUREG 1431.      Zn this sense, the change has already been reviewed and found acceptable by the NRC. There are no Cook Nuclear Plant specific features that would make the change not applicable.
There is already a plant procedure that verifies that the requirements of the T/S table are implemented. The table currently in the T/S will be relocated to the UFSAR. A note will be added to the procedure to ensure that any changes to the component cyclic or transient limits undergo an unreviewed safety cpxestlon determination per the retirements of 10 CFR 50.59. Per 10 CFR 50.59, the change can only be    made  if the  change does  not:
increase the probability of occurrence or consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated in the safety analysis report,
: 2. create the  possibility for an accident or malfunction of  a different type than any evaluated previously in the safety analysis report, or 3~    reduce the margin of safety as defined      in the basis for any T/S.
Any changes to the requirements    of the present table would have to pass the stringent criteria      of 10 CFR 50.59 in order to be implemented.
 
Attachment   1  to  AEP:NRC:0980U                                   Page 3 4~ 10 CFR 50.92 CRITERIA Per  10  CFR    50.92, a proposed amendment does not involve a significant    hazards consideration    if the change does not:
involve  a  significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, 2~       create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, or 3~       involve  a significant reduction in    a margin  of safety.
Criterion   1 The proposed change is administrative in nature in that          it simply relocates a table containing component cyclic and transient limits from the T/S to the UFSAR. Any change to the requirements of the table would have to be reviewed against the criteria of 10 CFR 50.59 to ensure the change does not create an unreviewed safety question. Additionally,       it is noted that the change is consistent with the new Standard T/S, recently issued by the NRC as NUREG 1431. Based on these considerations, the proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
Criterion   2 The change    only involves relocation of a table containing component cyclic and    transient limits from the T/S to the UFSAR. No specific physical changes to the plant or changes in plant operation will result directly from this change.             Any change in the limits contained in the current table will undergo a review against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59 to ensure that the change does not create an unreviewed safety question. Thus, the change will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
Criterion   3 The proposed change is administrative in nature in that          it transient simply limits relocates a table containing      component cyclic  and from  the  T/S  to  the UFSAR. Any change  to the  requirements  of  the table would have to be reviewed against the criteria of 10 CFR 50.59 to ensure the change does not create an unreviewed safety question. Additionally,   it is noted  that the  change  is consistent with the    new Standard T/S, recently issued by the NRC as NUREG 1431. Based on these considerations, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
to AEP:NRC! 0980U                              Page 4 Lastly, we note that the NRC has provided guidance concerning the determination of significant hazards by providing certain examples (48 FR 14870) of amendments considered not likely to involve significant hazards consideration. The sixth of these examples refers to changes which may result in some increase to the probability or consecpences of a previously evaluated accident, but the results of which are within acceptable limits. As discussed above, the removal of the cyclic and transient limit table from the T/S is consistent with the new Standard T/S, issued by the NRC as NUREG 1431. Since the change has already been found acceptable by the NRC, we conclude that the example cited is applicable and that the change should not involve significant hazards consideration.}}

Latest revision as of 01:29, 4 February 2020

Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,deleting TS 5.9.1 & Table 5.9-1,Unit 1 & TS 5.7.1 & Table 5.7-1,Unit 2 of TS Entitled, Component Cyclic or Transient Limits, Per New STS Published by NRC as NUREG-1431,dtd 920928
ML17331B061
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 11/12/1993
From: Fitzpatrick E
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17331B062 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-1431 AEP:NRC:098OU, AEP:NRC:98OU, NUDOCS 9311190273
Download: ML17331B061 (11)


Text

,'CCELERA. 0 DOCUMENT MST IUTION SYSTEM

~

. ~ REGUL. RY INFORMATION DISTRIBUT SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9311190273 DOC!DATE: 93/11/12 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKET ¹ FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION FIYZPATRICK,E. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana S Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E. Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Application for amends to licenses DPR-58 S DPR-74,deleting TS 5.9.1 6 Table 5.9-1,Unit 1 6 TS 5.7.1 & Table 5.7-1,Unit D 2 of TS entitled, "Component Cyclic or Transient Limits,"

per new STS published by NRC as NUREG-1431,dtd 920928.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOOID TITLE: OR COPIES RECEIVED:LTR Submittal: General Distribution J ENCL / SIZE: 0 +

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL D PD3-1 LA 1 1 PD3-1 PD 1 1 WETZEL,B 2 2 D INTERNAL: NRR/DE/EELB 1 1 NRR/DORS/OTSB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 0&/BBBGB . 1 0 OGC/HDS2 1 0 EG F LE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 D

D D

NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE} CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-31 (EXT. 504-2065) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 15 ENCL 13

Indiana Michiga~~

Power Compan~

P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 AEP:NRC:0980U Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUESTr DELETION OF COMPONENT CYCLIC OR TRANSIENT LIMIT TABLE U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Attn: T. E. Murley November 12, 1993

Dear Dr. Murley:

This letter and its attachments constitute an application for amendment to the Technical Specifications (T/S) for the Donald C.

Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90.

The proposed change deletes T/S 5.9.1 and Table 5.9-1 (Unit 1) and T/S 5.7.1 and Table 5.7-1 (Unit 2) of the T/S, entitled "Component Cyclic or Transient Limits." This change is consistent with the new Standard Technical Specifications for Westinghouse Plants, published by the NRC as NUREG 1431, dated September 28, 1992.

Attachment 1 provides a detailed description of the proposed change, the justification for the change, and our proposed determination of no significant hazards consideration performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92. Attachment 2 contains the existing T/S pages marked to reflect the proposed change. Attachment 3 contains the proposed, revised T/S pages.

We believe that the proposed change will not result in (1) a significant change in the types of effluents or a significant increase in the amount of any effluents that may be released offsite, or (2) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

The proposed change has been reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and by the Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee.

In compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.91(b)(l), copies of this letter and its attachments have been transmitted to Mr. J. R. Padgett of the Michigan Public Service Commission and to the Michigan Department of Public Health.

93i1190273 931112 PDR 'ADOCK 05000315 P PDR

h 4

Dr. T. E. Murley AEP:NRCt0980U This letter is submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.30(b) and, as such, an oath statement is attached.

Sincerely, E. E. Fitz trick Vice President dr Attachments cc: A. A. Blind Bridgman G. Charnoff J. B. Martin >> Region III NFEM Section Chief NRC Resident Inspector Bridgman J. R. Padgett

STATE OF OHIO)

COUNTY OF FRANKLIN)

E. E. Fitzpatrick, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the Vice President of licensee Indiana Michigan Power Company, that he has read the foregoing Technical Specification Change Request: Deletion of Component Cyclic or Transient Limit Table and knows the contents thereof; and that said contents are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

Subscribed and sworn to me before this day of NOTARY UBLIC

~ anA o. Htlt.

~ NOTARY PUBLIC. STAT OF OHIO AY COhihIISSION EXPIRE

ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:0980U 10 CFR 50.92 ANALYSZS FOR CHANGES TO THE DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNZTS 1 AND 2 TECHNZCAL SPECZFZCATZONS to AEP:NRC:0980U Page 1 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES We propose to delete from the technical specifications (T/S) T/S 5.9.1/Table 5.9-1 (Unit 1) and T/S 5.7.1/Table 5.7-1 (Unit 2),

entitled "Component Cyclic or Transient Limits." The limits of these T/S would be relocated to the UFSAR, and would be administratively controlled. Additionally, the Index Section is revised accordingly.

REASON FOR THE CHANGE The change achieves consistency with the new Standard T/S for Westinghouse Plants, published by the NRC as NUREG 1431 on September 28, 1992. The table contains cyclic and transient limits for the reactor coolant and secondary systems. For example, the table lists the number of heatup and cooldown cycles the reactor coolant system may undergo, as well as the number of hydrostatic pressure tests the reactor coolant system and secondary system may undergo. Although limits are provided in the table, there are no specific limiting conditions for operation or action statements provided.

NUREG 1431 was the result of a technical specification improvement program undertaken by the NRC and the nuclear industry. One of the results of the program was the streamlining of the T/S by removal of requirements that were better located elsewhere. The changes allowed the new T/S to be more clearly focused on those requirements necessary to support the safety analyses, versus requirements in vogue at the time of plant licensing. Four general criterion were used to determine if a recpirement from the former Standard T/S would remain in the new Standard T/S. These criterion involve:

1~ Installed instrumentation that is used to detect, and indicate in the control room, a significant abnormal degradation of the reactor coolant pressure boundary.

2~ A process variable that is an initial condition of a design basis accident or transient analysis that either

'assumes the failure of or presents a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier.

3~ A structure, system, or component that is part of the primary success path and which functions or actuates to mitigate a design basis 'accident or transient that either assumes the failure of or presents a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier.

4. Equipment that probabilistic risk assessment or operating experience has shown to be important to public health and safety.

Attachment 1 to AEP:NRC:0980U Page 2 The T/S and table we are proposing to remove contains component cyclic and transient limits. The table is essentially a requirement for recordkeeping regarding the number of cycles or transients that have been experienced by the reactor coolant or secondary systems. Zn this sense, the requirements are administrative in nature, and clearly did not meet any of the criteria listed above. Thus, the table was not included in the new Standard T/S. Removal of the table from the T/S will streamline the document, and will help to achieve the appropriate focus of the document.

3~ JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CHANGE The change is consistent with the new Standard T/Sg as published in NUREG 1431. Zn this sense, the change has already been reviewed and found acceptable by the NRC. There are no Cook Nuclear Plant specific features that would make the change not applicable.

There is already a plant procedure that verifies that the requirements of the T/S table are implemented. The table currently in the T/S will be relocated to the UFSAR. A note will be added to the procedure to ensure that any changes to the component cyclic or transient limits undergo an unreviewed safety cpxestlon determination per the retirements of 10 CFR 50.59. Per 10 CFR 50.59, the change can only be made if the change does not:

increase the probability of occurrence or consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated in the safety analysis report,

2. create the possibility for an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated previously in the safety analysis report, or 3~ reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any T/S.

Any changes to the requirements of the present table would have to pass the stringent criteria of 10 CFR 50.59 in order to be implemented.

Attachment 1 to AEP:NRC:0980U Page 3 4~ 10 CFR 50.92 CRITERIA Per 10 CFR 50.92, a proposed amendment does not involve a significant hazards consideration if the change does not:

involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, 2~ create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated, or 3~ involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

Criterion 1 The proposed change is administrative in nature in that it simply relocates a table containing component cyclic and transient limits from the T/S to the UFSAR. Any change to the requirements of the table would have to be reviewed against the criteria of 10 CFR 50.59 to ensure the change does not create an unreviewed safety question. Additionally, it is noted that the change is consistent with the new Standard T/S, recently issued by the NRC as NUREG 1431. Based on these considerations, the proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

Criterion 2 The change only involves relocation of a table containing component cyclic and transient limits from the T/S to the UFSAR. No specific physical changes to the plant or changes in plant operation will result directly from this change. Any change in the limits contained in the current table will undergo a review against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59 to ensure that the change does not create an unreviewed safety question. Thus, the change will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.

Criterion 3 The proposed change is administrative in nature in that it transient simply limits relocates a table containing component cyclic and from the T/S to the UFSAR. Any change to the requirements of the table would have to be reviewed against the criteria of 10 CFR 50.59 to ensure the change does not create an unreviewed safety question. Additionally, it is noted that the change is consistent with the new Standard T/S, recently issued by the NRC as NUREG 1431. Based on these considerations, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

to AEP:NRC! 0980U Page 4 Lastly, we note that the NRC has provided guidance concerning the determination of significant hazards by providing certain examples (48 FR 14870) of amendments considered not likely to involve significant hazards consideration. The sixth of these examples refers to changes which may result in some increase to the probability or consecpences of a previously evaluated accident, but the results of which are within acceptable limits. As discussed above, the removal of the cyclic and transient limit table from the T/S is consistent with the new Standard T/S, issued by the NRC as NUREG 1431. Since the change has already been found acceptable by the NRC, we conclude that the example cited is applicable and that the change should not involve significant hazards consideration.