ML15131A398: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML15131A398 | | number = ML15131A398 | ||
| issue date = 05/11/2015 | | issue date = 05/11/2015 | ||
| title = NRC Staff'S Answer | | title = NRC Staff'S Answer to Vermont'S Notice of Supplemental Authority | ||
| author name = Wachutka J | | author name = Wachutka J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/OGC | | author affiliation = NRC/OGC | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 4 | | page count = 4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:May 11, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ) | |||
) | |||
ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLC ) | |||
AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket No. 50-271-LA-2 | |||
) | |||
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) ) | |||
NRC STAFFS ANSWER TO VERMONTS NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (Staff) files this answer to the State of Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by the State of Vermont, through the Vermont Department of Public Service (Vermont) on May 4, 2015.1 While the Staff does not object to Vermont providing notice to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) and the participants of potentially relevant documents in the above-captioned proceeding, such notice should not serve as an opportunity for Vermont to make new arguments or submit without leave of the Board a sur-reply regarding the substance or merits of its pending petition for leave to intervene before the Board.2 Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority informs the Board and the participants of the availability of a draft environmental assessment (EA) and a draft finding of no significant impact (FONSI)3 related to an exemption request regarding emergency planning (EP)4 at the 1 | |||
State of Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority (May 4, 2015) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15124A845) (Notice). | |||
2 See State of Vermonts Petition for Leave to Intervene, and Hearing Request (Feb. 9, 2015) | |||
(ADAMS Accession No. ML15040A726); The State of Vermonts Reply to NRC Staff and Entergy Answers to Petition for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request (Mar. 17, 2015) (ADAMS Accession No. ML15076A546). | |||
3 See Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, 80 Fed. Reg. | |||
24,291 (Apr. 30, 2015). | |||
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VY). However, Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority then goes on to argue that the publication of this draft EA and FONSI supports the admissibility of Vermonts contentions submitted earlier in this proceeding.5 Specifically, from pages 3 to 4 of its Notice, Vermont attempts to add to its arguments in support of its previously-filed proposed Contentions 1 and 2. | |||
The Staff objects to the filing of these additional substantive arguments or the filing of a sur-reply outside of the Commissions procedures. In order to amend its contentions based on allegedly new and materially different information, Vermont would have had to have filed a motion under 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(c), which, in turn, would have had to have demonstrated good cause and satisfied the contention admissibility requirements of 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(f).6 Additionally, a sur-reply regarding a petition to intervene is not permitted by the Commissions regulations.7 Therefore, at the very least, a participant would have to first request leave of the presiding officer in order to file such a sur-reply. Since Vermont has not satisfied these requirements, the Board should disregard the new arguments that Vermont makes in its Notice. | |||
Vermonts new arguments or sur-reply also appear to be based on a misunderstanding of the NRCs exemption process and the roles of the Commission and the Staff under that process. For the purpose of attempting to clarify this misunderstanding, the following is provided. On November 14, 2014, the Staff sent SECY-14-0125 to the Commission stating that it had reviewed the technical basis for the VY EP Exemption Request and that it was requesting 4 | |||
See Letter from Christopher J. Wamser, Site Vice President, Entergy, to the NRC, Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Docket No. 50-271, License No. DPR-28 (Mar. 14, 2014) (ADAMS Accession No. ML14080A141) | |||
(VY EP Exemption Request). | |||
5 Notice at 3 (The NRC Staffs issuance of the Draft EA and FONSI impacts this Boards review in this proceeding in two ways . . . .). | |||
6 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(c)(1), (4). | |||
7 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(i)(3). | |||
the Commissions approval to process and grant, as appropriate the request.8 On March 2, 2015, the Commission approved the Staffs recommendation to grant the VY EP Exemption Request and stated that [t]he Commission continues to support the current practice of approving appropriately justified exemptions from certain emergency planning requirements while plants are transitioning to decommissioning based on site-specific evaluations.9 As the Board noted, the exemptions havent technically issued yet, but [the] Commission has approved them conceptually . . . .10 Accordingly, the Board should disregard the new arguments or sur-reply presented in Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority. | |||
Respectfully submitted, | |||
/Signed (electronically) by/ | |||
Jeremy L. Wachutka Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-1571 E-mail: Jeremy.Wachutka@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 11th day of May, 2015 8 | |||
SECY-14-0125, Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements, at 1-2, 4 (Nov. 14, 2014) (ADAMS Accession No. ML14227A711). | |||
9 SRM-SECY-14-0125, Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements (Mar. 2, 2015) (ADAMS Accession No. ML15061A516). | |||
10 Transcript of Teleconference in the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), at 9:14-15 (Apr. 8, 2015) | |||
(ADAMS Accession No. ML15104A384). | |||
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ) | |||
) | |||
ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLC ) | |||
AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket No. 50-271-LA-2 | |||
) | |||
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) ) | |||
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.305, I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing NRC STAFFS ANSWER TO VERMONTS NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY, dated May 11, 2015, have been filed through the Electronic Information Exchange, the NRCs E-Filing System, in the above-captioned proceeding, this 11th day of May, 2015. | |||
/Signed (electronically) by/ | |||
Jeremy L. Wachutka Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-1571 E-mail: Jeremy.Wachutka@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 11th day of May, 2015}} |
Latest revision as of 12:52, 5 February 2020
ML15131A398 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Vermont Yankee ![]() |
Issue date: | 05/11/2015 |
From: | Jeremy Wachutka NRC/OGC |
To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
SECY RAS | |
References | |
50-271-LA-2, ASLBP 15-937-02-LA-BD01, RAS 27788 | |
Download: ML15131A398 (4) | |
Text
May 11, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLC )
AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket No. 50-271-LA-2
)
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) )
NRC STAFFS ANSWER TO VERMONTS NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff (Staff) files this answer to the State of Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by the State of Vermont, through the Vermont Department of Public Service (Vermont) on May 4, 2015.1 While the Staff does not object to Vermont providing notice to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) and the participants of potentially relevant documents in the above-captioned proceeding, such notice should not serve as an opportunity for Vermont to make new arguments or submit without leave of the Board a sur-reply regarding the substance or merits of its pending petition for leave to intervene before the Board.2 Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority informs the Board and the participants of the availability of a draft environmental assessment (EA) and a draft finding of no significant impact (FONSI)3 related to an exemption request regarding emergency planning (EP)4 at the 1
State of Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority (May 4, 2015) (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15124A845) (Notice).
2 See State of Vermonts Petition for Leave to Intervene, and Hearing Request (Feb. 9, 2015)
(ADAMS Accession No. ML15040A726); The State of Vermonts Reply to NRC Staff and Entergy Answers to Petition for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request (Mar. 17, 2015) (ADAMS Accession No. ML15076A546).
3 See Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, 80 Fed. Reg.
24,291 (Apr. 30, 2015).
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (VY). However, Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority then goes on to argue that the publication of this draft EA and FONSI supports the admissibility of Vermonts contentions submitted earlier in this proceeding.5 Specifically, from pages 3 to 4 of its Notice, Vermont attempts to add to its arguments in support of its previously-filed proposed Contentions 1 and 2.
The Staff objects to the filing of these additional substantive arguments or the filing of a sur-reply outside of the Commissions procedures. In order to amend its contentions based on allegedly new and materially different information, Vermont would have had to have filed a motion under 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(c), which, in turn, would have had to have demonstrated good cause and satisfied the contention admissibility requirements of 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(f).6 Additionally, a sur-reply regarding a petition to intervene is not permitted by the Commissions regulations.7 Therefore, at the very least, a participant would have to first request leave of the presiding officer in order to file such a sur-reply. Since Vermont has not satisfied these requirements, the Board should disregard the new arguments that Vermont makes in its Notice.
Vermonts new arguments or sur-reply also appear to be based on a misunderstanding of the NRCs exemption process and the roles of the Commission and the Staff under that process. For the purpose of attempting to clarify this misunderstanding, the following is provided. On November 14, 2014, the Staff sent SECY-14-0125 to the Commission stating that it had reviewed the technical basis for the VY EP Exemption Request and that it was requesting 4
See Letter from Christopher J. Wamser, Site Vice President, Entergy, to the NRC, Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Docket No. 50-271, License No. DPR-28 (Mar. 14, 2014) (ADAMS Accession No. ML14080A141)
5 Notice at 3 (The NRC Staffs issuance of the Draft EA and FONSI impacts this Boards review in this proceeding in two ways . . . .).
6 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(c)(1), (4).
7 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(i)(3).
the Commissions approval to process and grant, as appropriate the request.8 On March 2, 2015, the Commission approved the Staffs recommendation to grant the VY EP Exemption Request and stated that [t]he Commission continues to support the current practice of approving appropriately justified exemptions from certain emergency planning requirements while plants are transitioning to decommissioning based on site-specific evaluations.9 As the Board noted, the exemptions havent technically issued yet, but [the] Commission has approved them conceptually . . . .10 Accordingly, the Board should disregard the new arguments or sur-reply presented in Vermonts Notice of Supplemental Authority.
Respectfully submitted,
/Signed (electronically) by/
Jeremy L. Wachutka Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-1571 E-mail: Jeremy.Wachutka@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 11th day of May, 2015 8
SECY-14-0125, Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements, at 1-2, 4 (Nov. 14, 2014) (ADAMS Accession No. ML14227A711).
9 SRM-SECY-14-0125, Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements (Mar. 2, 2015) (ADAMS Accession No. ML15061A516).
10 Transcript of Teleconference in the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), at 9:14-15 (Apr. 8, 2015)
(ADAMS Accession No. ML15104A384).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE, LLC )
AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket No. 50-271-LA-2
)
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.305, I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing NRC STAFFS ANSWER TO VERMONTS NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY, dated May 11, 2015, have been filed through the Electronic Information Exchange, the NRCs E-Filing System, in the above-captioned proceeding, this 11th day of May, 2015.
/Signed (electronically) by/
Jeremy L. Wachutka Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15-D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-1571 E-mail: Jeremy.Wachutka@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 11th day of May, 2015